ChapterPDF Available

Science Education in Egypt Based on Integrating Ecological Needs and STEAMEducation

Authors:

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to review and highlight some recent efforts to reform science education. The focus is to present science education in ways that are meaningful and reflective of the needs and interests of learners and their societies. Two main initiatives are presented that have picked up momentum and both emphasise interdisciplinary learning and a focus on developing 21st century skills as a global requirement. One of them is Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) while the other is Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) education. The paper illustrates international efforts of these two main initiatives with an aim to precisely review the board spectrum of how science education is interpreted within ESD and STEM practices. Moreover, the paper presents a more recent debate, which focuses on the deliberate shift from STEM to STEAM education. The focus of inquiry of this paper, therefore, is to research the possible models of introducing science education to the educational system in Egypt, within a framework that meets international calls for ESD and STEM/STEAM education. The paper contributes to the literature as it looks at a region at a transformational stage both politically and socially. This calls for a need for education transformation with innovative ideas to meet the requirements of this stage. Infusing ESD/STEM/STEAM education through an innovative model of STE2AM education based on Freire’s Liberatory Education in the educational system is a radical view but could be met with caution, preparation and readiness of all stakeholders in the system. With such view, this calls for political and practical changes in science teaching and learning in a country that is lagging behind in many developmental areas, where education is one of them.
Part 10
Strand 10
Science curriculum and educational policy
Co-editors: Andreas Redfors & Jim Ryder
Strand 10 Science curriculum and educational policy
CONTENTS
Chapter
Title & Authors
Page
174
Introduction to Strand 10
Andreas Redfors & Jim Ryder
1442
175
Science education in Egypt based on integrating ecological needs
and STEAM education
Heba EL-Deghaidy
1445
176
Two teaching styles in a French science partnership
Vincent Voisin, Nathalie Magneron & Maryline Coquidé
1457
177
Scientific school research: in-service teachers assessment of
educational contents and strategies
Teresa Lupión Cobos & Carolina Martín Gámez
1466
178
COTEX: A checklist for competence-oriented textbooks in science
Katrin Bölsterli Bardy, Markus Wilhelm & Markus Rehm
1473
179
Teachers' perceptions of isolation and educational policies. Insights
from a four year empirical study
Francesco Cuomo, Emilio Balzano, Ciro Minichini &
marco Serpico
1482
180
The rationality island as a promising model for theoretical
generalization
Sylvie Barma, Marie-Caroline Vincent & Julie Massé-Morneau
1494
181
Educational policies and science education in Brazil: A case study
Paulo Sérgio Garcia & Nelio Bizzo
1506
182
Implementation of new teaching concepts by teacher training as a
process of recontextualization
Cornelia Stiller, Andreas Stockey & Matthias Wilde
1512
183
Teaching for competence in science education in Denmark
Seth Chaiklin
1523
Strand 10 Science curriculum and educational policy
Chapter
Title & Authors
Page
184
Implementing IBL and WOW in primary science in Norway
Maria Immaculata Maya Febri & Ragnhild Lyngved Staberg
1535
INTRODUCTION TO STRAND 10
SCIENCE CURRICULUM AND EDUCATIONAL POLICY
Policy involves the authoritative identification and practice of values (what counts as
important), attention (what gets noticed), goals (what we are trying to do) and resources
(Colebatch, 2009; Kogan, 1975). Following such a frame, education policy includes the
organisation of schooling institutions, funding models and resource allocation, the
representation of ‘aims’ in policy documents, curriculum requirements at national or regional
level, assessment procedures and the uses of assessment in national contexts. Within this we
can identify strong themes of science education policy, e.g. reforms to the science curriculum
and policies on national assessment practices in science. These education policies have a
huge impact on the experiences of science teachers and science learners. For example,
national high stakes testing of student attainment (Au, 2007), PISA shock in Germany (Ertl,
2006), science curriculum reforms (Tytler, 2007; Dede, 2010).
What is the role of ESERA within this education policy world? ESERA is an organisation of
researchers, with an international perspective. Thus, we would argue that within the
membership of ESERA there should be an explicit research focus on science education
policy. In our view this is not the same as saying that researchers within ESERA should seek
to influence science education policy. Arguably all, or at least most, researchers should seek
to engage policy makers with the findings of their research. Rather, we are highlighting here
a need for researchers to develop a better understanding of the processes and outcomes of
science education policy through empirical and theoretical studies. This section of the
ESERA eProceedings represents some of the work addressing the above goals within the
ESERA community.
Several of the contributions take a broad focus on national education policy within specific
country settings. El-Deghaidy explores two themes often represented within education policy:
education for sustainable development, and ‘STEM’ education policy. These policies are then
‘localised’ or ‘customised’ to the national context of Egypt. An explicitly historical analysis
is taken by Chaiklin who explores the development of ‘competence goals’ as a policy theme
in Denmark. He identifies the different meanings of competence within policy texts,
suggesting that this makes it difficult for teachers to work with competence goals in their
school settings. Garcia and Bizzo provide a distinctive study that explores science education
policy and its relation to education policies in Portuguese and mathematics within Brazil.
Their study includes a large-scale survey of students’ perspectives on the relevance of these
different subjects, identifying links between the framing of these three subjects in national
assessment policies and students’ perceptions of relevance. This latter study usefully
highlights the ways in which policies interact, with multiple policies being experienced all at
once by teachers and students.
Other contributions present empirical studies of ‘what happens’ when policies are enacted in
specific education contexts. Here we draw attention to the distinction between the terms
policy ‘implementation’ and ‘enactment’. Many scholars prefer the term ‘enactment’ since
this emphasises a process over time, working with a policy within specific education settings,
and an ongoing activity to ‘shape’ policy in relation to the detail of the setting. By contrast,
the term ‘implementation’ can suggest that a policy can be delivered ‘as is’, with minimal
adaptation, in different settings (an extreme case of this would be ‘teacher proof’ curriculum
Strand 10
Science curriculum and educational policy
1 442
materials). Although these terms are not used in all contributions in this section, or
consistently in this way, the overall framing of the studies is an enactment model of policy.
Thus, Cobos and Gamez provide an analysis of teachers’ perspectives on the teaching of
science research processes in the province of Malaga, Spain. The relevant policy theme here
is that of ‘scientific literacy’. Barma et al. provide case studies of how two teachers in
Quebec, Canada, enact an open-ended learning task (the rationality island) that encourages
students to work together on exploring specific science themes (e.g. climate change). The
authors see this as a ‘formative intervention’; an intervention that is open to adapt to input
given by students and teacher during enactment. They locate the intervention as coherent with
prescriptions within the Quebec science curriculum. In a similar style Voisin et al. provide
two case studies of the enactment of partnerships between high schools and science research
centres. The focus is on the detail of tutoring as high school students work with doctoral
students within science research settings, highlighting two different tutoring styles.
Bardy et al. focus on school textbooks as ‘tools for implementing new curricula’. This is
consistent with other policy researchers who identify textbooks as a key lever, or mediator, of
policy; as a ‘policy technology’ (Ball, 2003). This distinctive study uses practitioner
responses to develop a set of standards that can be used to ‘conceptualise or assess
competence-oriented textbooks’.
Three of the contributions focus on the detail of teachers’ experiences as they enact education
policies. Stiller et al. examine the enactment of a teacher education course on scientific
literacy. Their analysis is sensitive to interactions of the designed course with local teacher
contexts. They suggest that such courses are best seen as supporting ‘a guided re-invention of
a developed concept under local conditions. Febri and Staberg examine the enactment of
‘inquiry-based learning linked to the world of work’ in Norway at primary school level. Their
analysis identifies specific supporting and challenging factors as reported by teachers,
focusing very strongly on the significance for the teachers of students’ responses in the
classroom. Cuomo et al. report on a four-year mixed methods study of teachers’ reflections
on their professional lives. One focus of their analysis is on teachers’ interactions with
education research; a theme of clear significance within ESERA. They report that ‘interaction
[with research and researchers] should be contextual to teachers’ work reality, relevant, long-
term and consistent’. Their study also reports that teachers can often feel constrained by
systemic curriculum policies and would welcome ‘broader’ curriculum prescription, which
then invites local adaptation. These three contributions explore in detail the factors
underpinning teachers’ responses and in some cases how these change over time. They also
examine the characteristics of policy that support, or constrain, teachers’ responses. An
implication across these three studies is that designing flexibility within a policy can support
and encourage teachers to adapt policies to suit local contexts (Ryder, 2015).
The meanings of ‘policy’, as represented across the contributions in this section, are varied.
At one level studies explore national, systemic education reforms. In other contributions such
systemic policies are more in the background, and the research focus is more on the
enactment of specific interventions on a very local scale. This suggests that there is an
important debate to be had within, and likely beyond, ESERA on the meaning of ‘policy’ and
its relation to our work. We hope that this section of the ESERA eProceedings will encourage
and enrich such debates.
Andreas Redfors1 and Jim Ryder2
1Kristianstad University, Sweden
2University of Leeds, UK
Strand 10
Science curriculum and educational policy
1 443
REFERENCES
Au, W. (2007). High-Stakes Testing and Curricular Control: A Qualitative Metasynthesis.
Educational Researcher, 36(5), 258-267.
Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher's soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education
Policy, 18(2), 215-228
Colebatch, H. K. (2009). Policy (3rd ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Dede, C. (2010). Comparing frameworks for 21st century skills. In J. Bellanca & R. Brandt
(Eds.), 21st century skills: Rethinking how students learn (pp. 51-76). Bloomington, IN:
Solution Tree Press.
Ertl, H. (2006). Educational Standards and the Changing Discourse on Education: The
Reception and Consequences of the PISA Study in Germany. Oxford Review of
Education 32(5), 619-634.
Kogan, M. (1975). Educational policy-making: A study of interest groups and parliament.
London: George Allen and Unwin.
Ryder, J. (2015). Being professional: accountability and authority in teachers’ responses to
science curriculum reform. Studies in Science Education 51(1), 87-120.
Tytler, R. (2007). Re-imagining Science Education. Engaging students in science for
Australia’s future. Australian Education Review, 51. ACER Press
https://www.acer.edu.au/aer
Strand 10
Science curriculum and educational policy
1 444
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
This article’s primary objective is to unfold how teachers translate education for sustainable development (ESD) in a school context. The article argues that exploring tensions, ruptures and openings apparent in this meeting is crucial for the development of existing teaching practices in relation to ESD. The article draws on doctoral research involving interviews with researchers and teachers who have collaborated in ESD research and development projects at primary and secondary schools in two different countries, Denmark and Ireland. It is the teachers’ perspectives on the projects which form the analytical foundation; thus, it is the practices as seen from the ‘inside’. Furthermore, ESD practices are considered in a broader societal perspective, pointing to the critical power of the practice lens.
Article
Full-text available
This study reports on Egyptian science teachers’ experiences in collective action research projects with a focus on education for sustainable development (ESD). Science teachers were enrolled in a study course “Teaching Strategies” that had been revised with a focus on sustainability. The course was introduced in the spring semester of the academic year 2011/2012. Throughout the course, 29 teachers worked in groups to develop projects that promote sustainable development through classroom teaching practices that encourage involvement with local communities around school premises. The framework that guided the study was based on experiential, constructivist and transformative learning theories known collectively as ‘ExConTra’. A mixed methods methodology was used where teachers’ responses to three open-ended reflective questions produced qualitative data that were analysed by identifying themes and patterns. The author developed two quantitative instruments: a Concept Mapping Rubric and a Sustainable Development Questionnaire. The former was to probe the cognitive organisation participants had in relation to the concept of sustainable development before and after developing the action research projects. The latter instrument was used to identify participants’ attitudes towards teaching for ESD and their knowledge of classroom pedagogical practices. Statistical data analysis using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences indicates that teachers in their post-tests had developed: better cognitive organisation for the concept of sustainable development; positive attitudes towards teaching for sustainable development and ESD classroom teaching practices. Involvement in the action research projects where teachers were experiencing, reflecting, conceptualising, constructing, acting and transforming within the context of ESD may be responsible for these results where there are promises to help achieve successful implementation to include ESD in science education.
Article
Full-text available
The population growth together with the unsustainable consumption pattern is putting increasing stress on the planet’s natural resources. The increasing realisation that humans are harming the environment is taking the form of a global movement intended to change behaviour towards sustainability, now recognised as a framework that links humans to nature. Continuous exploitation of natural systems in the Arab region leads to environmental damages that negatively affect human well-being. This article presents a case study from the Reorient University Curricula to Address Sustainability (RUCAS) Tempus project funded by the European Commission. It highlights the results of an empirical study in the Faculty of Business Administration and Economics (FBAE) at Notre Dame University -Louaize (NDU) in Lebanon. The main objective is to assess the need for education for sustainable development (ESD) through an examination of students’ attitudes and competences with the aim of reorienting university curricula to address sustainability. A framework based on the pillars of learning set by UNESCO was developed to measure ESD attitudes and competences. The main findings reveal the need to reorient university courses to address sustainability issues. Attitudes questions suggest that relatively high numbers of students are not aware of their responsibilities for environmental problems, which imply the necessity for a revised curriculum where courses are restructured to inform students of their responsibility for their environment and the quality of life. The results show that the disciplinary competences are significantly lower than the five pillars of learning (general competences) which indicate that the FBAE needs to reorient its curricula to infuse ESD into its programmes through the development of effective pedagogical approaches, teaching methodologies as well as learning materials.
Article
Students are making choices in middle school that will impact their desire and ability to pursue STEM careers. Providing middle school students with accurate information about STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics) careers enables them to make more knowledgeable choices about courses of study and career paths. Practical ways of helping students understand the nature of science careers are limited. This study investigates using video interviews of STEM professionals as a method for better informing students about STEM career possibilities. ANCOVA analysis was used to compare treatment and comparison student interest in pursuing STEM careers before and after viewing video interviews with STEM professionals. Evidence for implementing video interviews as a way to interest middle school students in pursuing STEM careers exists. No gender differential in interest in STEM was detected.
Article
The science curriculum is a focus of repeated reform in many countries. However, the enactment of such reforms within schools rarely reflects the intended outcomes of curriculum designers. This review considers what we know about the experiences and reflections of teachers in the enactment of externally driven school science curriculum reform. 'Externally driven' signals a focus on studies of teachers who did not make a proactive choice to adopt a particular curriculum reform initiative. This is a very common experience for teachers in many school systems, and one likely to highlight issues of professionalism and authority that are central to the work of teachers. The review analyses 34 relevant studies. These include studies of teachers' experiences of national curriculum reform, and also studies focusing on more regional or local curriculum reform activities. The studies examine individual teachers' beliefs, practices and reflections associated with curriculum reform, the response of teacher communities to reform (e.g. within school departments), and teachers' (and other stakeholders') experiences across school systems. A wide range of factors influencing teachers' responses are identified. These are characterised in terms of personal, internal and external contexts of teachers' work. The review also highlights issues of authority, professionalism and the process of meaning-making in response to external curriculum reform. The discussion section identifies important areas for future research and gives recommendations for the design of curriculum policies that recognise and support the professionalism of science teachers.