ArticlePDF Available

The Right to Remain: Reading and Resisting Dispossession in Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside with Participatory Art-Making

Authors:
  • First Nations Information Governance Centre

Figures

No caption available
… 
No caption available
… 
Content may be subject to copyright.
feral feminisms
Complicities, Connections, & Struggles:
Critical Transnational Feminist Analysis
of Settler Colonialism
issue 4 . summer 2015
The Right to Remain: Reading and Resisting Dispossession in
Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside with Participatory Art-Making
Aaron Franks, Andy Mori, Ali Lohan, Je Masuda, and
the Right to Remain Community Fair Team
All photographs by Trevor Wideman
Powell Street Festival/Oppenheimer Park
Tent City Postcard Project, August 2014
Reection, in response to Nishant
15 November, 2014
Dear Nishant,
Thank you for your interest in the
Right to Remain Community Fair
(the RRCF) currently taking place in
Occupied Coast Salish Territories.
We are glad you enjoyed our work at
the Powell Street Festival in August
(http://www.powellstreetfestival.
com). As neighbourhood
artists with the RRCF we are
contributing to the research project
“Revitalizing Japantown?” (www.
revitalizingjapantown.com) through
a peer-led series of participatory arts
workshops for and by DTES residents
and allies. One element is that
labeling neighbourhoods can be a way
of gentrifying them. Maybe there is a
need for “counterlabels”? Maybe, if
marketable new “lifestyle” names like
“JapaGasRailtown” (http://twitter.
com/cuchilloyvr) are commodifying
Front of Postcards: (1) from Powell Street Festival goers to the
Oppenheimer Park Tent City campers: Asahi Men’s Baseball
Team, Paueru gai, Vancouver; (2) from Oppenheimer Park Tent
City campers to the Powell Street Festival goers: Tent City,
Oppenheimer Park, Vancouver, August, 2014
The Right to Remain Community Fair:
Participatory Art as Research in The
Downtown Eastside
“Revitalizing Japantown?: A
unifying exploration of Human
Rights, Branding and Place in
Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside”
(www.revitalizingjapantown.ca) is
a three-year community research
project funded by the Social Sciences
and Humanities Research Council
of Canada that links the current
rapid gentrication via capitalist
accumulation in the Downtown
Eastside of Vancouver to prior
colonial appropriations from First
Nations, Japanese, other racialized
residents, as well mental-health
system survivors and low-income
people.
From June 2014 through
January 2015, we are working with
Gallery Gachet (http://gachet.org),
the Nikkei National Museum and
Cultural Centre (NNM) (http://
centre.nikkeiplace.org) and six
other partners to engage low-
income residents in a Right to
Remain Community Fair (RRCF) in
43
The Right to Remain Community Fair Team are coordinator Ali Lohan and
community peer arts facilitators Quin Martins, Andy Mori, Herb Varley,
and Karen Ward. The RRCF is the arts phase of the three-year “Revitalizing
Japantown?: A unifying exploration of Human Rights, Branding and
Place in Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside” community research project,
in partnership with Gallery Gachet, the Greater Vancouver Japanese
Canadian Citizen’s Association, the Nikkei National Museum and Cultural
Centre, PACE, the Potluck Café Society, the Powell Street Festival Society,
the Strathcona Business Improvement Association, and the Vancouver
Japanese Language School and Japanese Hall.
feral feminisms
Complicities, Connections, & Struggles:
Critical Transnational Feminist Analysis
of Settler Colonialism
issue 4 . summer 2015
the culture and class of the people
who built the area, we need to counter
with names that represent and
respect the lives of those who have
been and are still being pushed out?
“Japantown” refers to
an old portion of the Vancouver
Downtown Eastside neighbourhood
around Powell Street that was
allocated for Japanese migrants
to Canada (Nikkei) beginning in
1877. Its residents were evacuated
shortly after Pearl Harbor in light
of the wartime paranoia and racism
that became institutionalized at all
levels of government (Adachi, 1976).
So in my mind the revitalization of
“Japantown” could only really mean
a reinstatement of its residents and
heritage there, but the issue is more
complicated than that. Is it in the
interest of some to gloss over history?
The Nikkei obviously weren’t the rst
to be violently displaced out of the
area. The DTES was one the earliest
places of Indigenous settlement in
what became Vancouver.
An Indigenous RRCF
community artist has said that
through his time dealing with the
development of the area he came
to realize that there had been a
whole series of displacements from
this patch of land. The rst one
chronologically was the regional
Indigenous peoples, then the
internment of Japanese immigrants,
then the black residents displaced
by freeway viaducts around
Hogan’s Alley (see http://www.
blackstrathcona.com), and presently
those of low income and marginalized
residents who have no property
ownership (Blomley, 2004). Each
time this has happened it has violated
residents’ “Right to Remain” in what
one local “Revitalizing Japantown?”
participant says “has always been a
Postcards from Powell Street Festival to the
Oppenheimer Park Camp:
Top to Bottom: postcard from Paola; postcard from Lane;
postcard from David.
Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside. The
Fair features monthly Human Rights
Arts Workshops and presentations
at valued DTES spaces like the
Vancouver Area Network of Drug
Users (VANDU), Aboriginal Front
Door (AFD), the Interurban Gallery,
and the Carnegie Community Centre.
In March-April 2015 and October
2015-January 2016, Gachet and the
NNM will host separate exhibits
inspired by these workshops, their
participants, and their arts process.
Art can celebrate and
gather people (and gather people in
celebration); it can also accuse and
scream. Both and all variations in
between are possible. In this spirit the
Fair hasn’t looked to make “good,”
celebratory, or educational art about
Human Rights. We have worked with
partners and residents to develop the
Fair because the ethic of relationship-
building behind participatory art
as research stands in opposition
to the current development model
in the area, which has roots in the
neighbourhood’s colonial history.
This is a development model in
which:
[T]he Low Income community
in particular, which is
overrepresented by its
racialized communities,
indigenous, and particular
migrant communities, is at
a disadvantage as the area
becomes reconceptualized as
an “artist district” without an
analysis of class. (Gachet sta
member, interview, 2014)
Art is an exchange of experience, not just
economy.
It’s often said that the DTES has
the highest concentration of artists
in Vancouver, and quite possibly
Canada. The observation can serve
44
The Right to Remain
Aaron Franks, Andy Mori, Ali Lohan, Je Masuda,
and the Right to Remain Community Fair Team
feral feminisms
Complicities, Connections, & Struggles:
Critical Transnational Feminist Analysis
of Settler Colonialism
issue 4 . summer 2015
poor person’s neighbourhood.”
The links between this
series of displacements struck us
again during the RRCF when the
Oppenheimer Park Tent City sprung
up to highlight both the plight of the
homeless and the Supreme Court
decision on native land rights. This
coincided with the Powell Street
Festival, an annual street festival that
reclaims for the August long weekend
this area of Japantown to celebrate its
culture and Nikkei culture generally.
The festival organizers showed
respect for the occupation of the park
that they would normally use for the
event by relocating to nearby streets
and sidewalks, showing solidarity in
the struggle for the Right to Remain.
In a “Revitalizing
Japantown?” arts team brainstorming
session for the Powell Street
Festival we hit upon an idea. Why
not have the festival participants
write postcards of encouragement
to the Oppenheimer Park Tent City
and vice versa? This would bridge
communities across the divides of
history by showing common concern
for the Right to Remain. Human
Rights should not be abstract gifts
from the powerful—the Right to
Remain is the right to self-identied
homes, identities, ways of making
a living, and tools for resisting
colonialism and gentrication linked
by racist economic exploitation.
I did the graphic design of
the postcards, choosing images from
the men’s Asahi Baseball team, a
legendary local Japanese Canadian
baseball program before the war. A
second set of postcards designed with
a photo of the Tent City occupying
the very area of the baseball diamond
where the men once stood was also
made, to lend a bridge across time in
the same location.
Postcard from Pia.
Postcards from the Oppenheimer Park Camp to the
Powell Street Festival:
Top to Bottom: postcard from Anthony; postcard from AJ.
many agendas and has been repeated
so often that it might be cliché. It’s
not a precise equivalent, but “highest
concentration of artists in Vancouver”
can have the same lazy eect as
“poorest postal code in Canada,” as
generic celebrations of “concentrated
artists” (just add water…) smother
the neighbourhood with prot-ready
notions of “edgy” and “vibrant.”
The City of Vancouver’s
recent Local Area Planning Process
(LAPP) report (City of Vancouver,
2014) devotes a Chapter (14) to Arts
and Culture. The Chapter opens
by presenting “art and culture” in
the DTES as a thing that comes
into being through three areas of
increased investment and capacity:
Improved Arts and Culture Facilities;
Art in Public Places; and Increased
Opportunities for the Creative
Economy (p.143). In a planning
document it’s not surprising that
art is (re)placed into the community
in this way, as Facility, Place, and
(Creative) Economy. Even though it
may not be a building or coordinate
on a map as in a “Facility” or “Public
Place,” the “Creative Economy” is no
less specic in how it locates art in the
DTES.
While it shouldn’t surprise
us, it’s nevertheless important
to remember that handling art
this way mediates our encounters
with the artist’s aective labour
and, more importantly for the
political economy of the DTES,
mediates artists’ relationship with
the place they call home. Rather
than more opportunities for art-
making for artists who live in the
DTES, the “spatial x” creates more
opportunities for investment in art
as an engine for gentrication in
the DTES. All artists have a right
to be paid for their craft and to sell
45
The Right to Remain
Aaron Franks, Andy Mori, Ali Lohan, Je Masuda,
and the Right to Remain Community Fair Team
feral feminisms
Complicities, Connections, & Struggles:
Critical Transnational Feminist Analysis
of Settler Colonialism
issue 4 . summer 2015
Once implemented at the
Festival, over 30 postcards were
written and signed by festivalgoers,
assisted and encouraged by myself
and RRCF arts team members Ali
Lohan and Quin Martins. Using a
rapidly obsolete medium reinforced
the performative aspect of replicating
historic communication practices.
Arts team members Herb Varley and
Karen Ward had the task of taking the
Tent City postcards to Oppenheimer
Park for its occupants to sign and
send back to the festival. There were
formalities, obstacles and issues of
trust in order to get those postcards
signed and sent back, but it was still
being carried on well after the PSF
ended.
I feel the postcard project
to be a great success as a living
history “lesson” in the personal craft
of handwritten cards of solidarity
turned into group petitioning and
in the acknowledgement of Human
Rights, all touched on at once. It also
reminded us all of how the Powell
Street Festival was originally born
of a call for activism and Japanese
Canadian redress, and that historic
apologies still hang in the air waiting
to be said, with their attendant
responsibilities.
- Andy Mori, artist
Works Cited
Adachi, K. The Enemy That Never
Was. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart
Limited, 1976.
Blomley, N. Unsettling the City: Urban
Land and the Politics of Property. New
York: Routledge, 2004.
Top to Bottom: postcard from Janet; postcard from Janet.
their work and skills if they choose.
When it comes to clichés the stale
romance of the starving artist has
had a longer shelf life than most. But
it is very doubtful that “increasing
opportunities for the Creative
Economy” means improved resources
(never mind sales) for the many
practicing artists of long standing
who live in the DTES yet reap no
benets from gentrication.
Art to repossess the DTES (and its
image)
Elsewhere in the LAPP document, the
city refers to strategies to “accelerate
vibrancy” (see the section on “Built
Form,” p.70). But people and places
aren’t simple particles that on e can
slow down and speed up. A strategy
of “accelerating vibrancy” to “increase
opportunities for the Creative
Economy” (p.143) plays out as an
accumulation strategy that rubs out
the concrete complexity of life—the
complexity of meeting needs, of what
change is—through the abstract space
of development. Living, changing, and
meeting needs while under the threat
of dispossession and marginalization
demands an art that exchanges more
than just money.
The individual and
collaborative artworks emergent out
of the RRCF embody this, as does
Andy’s personal description of the
creative postcard exchange between
homeless campers “occupying”
Oppenheimer Park (unceded
Aboriginal territory) with their tents
and longhouse and members of the
Nikkei diaspora attending the Powell
Street Festival. And while many of the
works created during the RRCF (e.g.,
the dioramas below) contain direct
messages of resistance, there is more
to their aesthetic than polemic, or
‘giving voice’:
46
The Right to Remain
Aaron Franks, Andy Mori, Ali Lohan, Je Masuda,
and the Right to Remain Community Fair Team
feral feminisms
Complicities, Connections, & Struggles:
Critical Transnational Feminist Analysis
of Settler Colonialism
issue 4 . summer 2015
Dioramas – (workshop at VANDU, facilitated by Karen Ward and the RRCF Team):
[I]n terms of the trauma and
suering which is part of—in
especially the low-income
communities, marginalized,
displaced communities—
everyday experience…one of
the dierences…is thinking
through these elements as
an element of quality, not an
element of marginalization.
(Gachet sta member,
interview 2014)
The motto of Gallery Gachet, a
Community Partner for the Fair, is
“Art is a Means for Survival.” The
Right to Remain Community Fair
approaches art as a means for shared
debate, healing, pleasure and pain,
and an understanding of what it has
meant and means to survive in the
DTES in the past, present, and future,
using the tools of Human Rights
and art-making. The “Revitalizing
Japantown?” team of researchers,
students, residents, and community
organizations are privileged to work
in a community where art, creativity,
and the complexity of living are
considered basic parts of knowing,
history, and politics, rather than frills
and add-ons.
- Aaron Franks, “Revitalizing
Japantown?” research team member
Works Cited
City of Vancouver. Downtown Eastside
Plan. 2015. URL http://vancouver.ca/
les/cov/downtown-eastside-plan.pdf
(last accessed 27 April, 2015).
47
"Homeland Security" – Herb Varley
The Right to Remain
Aaron Franks, Andy Mori, Ali Lohan, Je Masuda,
and the Right to Remain Community Fair Team
feral feminisms
Complicities, Connections, & Struggles:
Critical Transnational Feminist Analysis
of Settler Colonialism
issue 4 . summer 2015
48
Top: “Homes Now” – DJ Joe
Bottom: No Title - Doronn Dalzell
The Right to Remain
Aaron Franks, Andy Mori, Ali Lohan, Je Masuda,
and the Right to Remain Community Fair Team
feral feminisms
Complicities, Connections, & Struggles:
Critical Transnational Feminist Analysis
of Settler Colonialism
issue 4 . summer 2015
49
”Aboriginal Healing and Wellness Centre” - Tracey Morrison
The Right to Remain
Aaron Franks, Andy Mori, Ali Lohan, Je Masuda,
and the Right to Remain Community Fair Team
feral feminisms
Complicities, Connections, & Struggles:
Critical Transnational Feminist Analysis
of Settler Colonialism
issue 4 . summer 2015
THE RIGHT TO REMAIN COMMUNITY FAIR (RRCF) was a year long community art-as-research component of the SSHRC-funded
community research partnership “Revitalizing ‘Japantown’?: a unifying exploration of Human Rights, branding and place in
Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside”. The RRCF Team is Ali Lohan, Quin Martins, Andy Mori, Herb Varley, Karen Ward and Trevor
Wideman. Aaron Franks was RJ-RRCF project Coordinator and is a postdoctoral researcher in Cultural Studies at Queen’s
University, Canada; Jeff Masuda is project Director and Canada Research Chair (Tier II) in Environmental Health Equity in the
School of Kinesiology and Health Studies (Queen’s).
50
The Right to Remain
Aaron Franks, Andy Mori, Ali Lohan, Je Masuda,
and the Right to Remain Community Fair Team
... They reemerge through memories (real and contrived), and they facilitate the manufacturing of place. The reassembling of such toponymies can shape oppressive processes of marginalization and banishment at the same time as they might encourage social justice and a "right to remain" (see Franks, Mori, Lohan, & Masuda, 2015). ...
Article
Geographic scholarship in critical toponymy has highlighted the importance of place naming as a form of discursive power within processes of urbanization. This paper builds on such literature and advances a novel theory of toponymic assemblage to interpret findings from a participatory research project in the Downtown Eastside of Vancouver, Canada. We foreground neighborhood history in the form of a Japanese Canadian enclave and its wartime uprooting and dispossession, and trace the historical antecedents of a resurrected toponymy of “Japantown” that has appropriated and renarrated Japanese Canadian history to facilitate further rounds of dispossession. Using a genealogical method, we highlight three “moments” of Japanese Canadian uprooting, return, presence, and activism, demonstrating how toponymies are assembled in place in heterogeneous and historically contiguous ways. This approach expands on current research in critical toponymy, offering a novel methodology for exploring the enrolment of toponymy, discourse, and materiality in the formation of place.
Chapter
Full-text available
In this chapter, we address what is currently thought to be the environmental origins (and consequences) of COVID-19, from the “wet markets” of Wuhan, China, to the clearing skies over major cities around the world, from the vastly unequal realities of urban (and rural) spread and containment to the reconfiguration of urban space, climate justice, and energy futures amid efforts to “save” or “reconfigure” the economy. In addition to telling the “front story” of the pandemic’s emergence and impact as it pertains to what is commonly referred to as “the environment,” we draw on several key lenses for understanding the “backstory.” We close with reflections on what many are calling a “fork in the road”—contested decisions being taken about how far to “bounce back” to “normal” versus “bouncing forward” to a more socially and ecologically sustainable future.
Chapter
In light of the rapidly unfolding consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic among the precariously housed community of the Downtown Eastside in Vancouver, we offer some reflections drawn from an ongoing activist research project the Right to Remain that has supported the life-saving frontline organizing response for tenants living under adverse housing circumstances in single room occupancy (SRO) buildings. With the public health system predictably overwhelmed at the onset of the pandemic, the gap was quickly filled by grassroots tenant organizers, whose capacity and credibility grew quickly as a result of their intimate knowledge of SROs and level of trust with tenants. From our experiences in chronicling their efforts between March and December, we describe how activist participatory research has important roles to play ‘beyond’ the project. With a vaccine just arriving, we are only half way through the crisis, and the ability to sustain basic supports, let alone continue on a pathway of transformative critical research, is in peril as burnout grows and tenants’ lives, including among our own collective, continue to be placed in jeopardy.
Chapter
Covid-19 has fundamentally changed the way individuals and groups interact in their everyday lives and, thus, key constructs within social capital research. These social changes, to be explored in this chapter, are (1) trust, (2) group membership (for good or bad), and (3) social isolation. The chapter highlights novel research opportunities including well-being benefits of non-human communities, an unprecedented “natural experiment,” and the longer-term impacts of social change on both health and social capital itself. Through its re-shaping of social capital, COVID-19 offers changes which may have meaningful influence on health and well-being, beyond its direct deleterious effects. It is vital that we reflect on previous social structures and new possibilities afforded by the disruption of systems and hegemonic structures which are only now possible and could make for a healthier, equitable future.
Chapter
The economic and social consequences of the COVID-19 global pandemic are both immediate and pervasive, and potentially profound. In this chapter, I take a social geographical perspective on both acute and chronic consequences, centering around the idea of the social, the hard edge of inequality, and social justice. These three components help to frame two key relationships that arguably emerge as socioeconomic consequences of the global pandemic: (1) the contradictory relationship between social distancing and social infrastructure and (2) the compounding relationship between economic hardship and so-called deaths of despair. In effect, social distancing undermines the density of social bonds and closeness so essential to social infrastructure such as libraries, markets, and care homes. Conversely, the sudden rise in mass unemployment may have long-term socioeconomic consequences for already increasing rates of suicide and drug/alcohol overdose in nations such as the US and the UK.
Article
Drawing from a multi-year research presence in Vancouver, Canada’s Downtown Eastside, we generate insights into the praxis of the historically dispossessed within contemporary processes of subaltern urbanisms. Interviews with past and present Downtown Eastside residents reveal parallel narratives of dispossession and remaining between Japanese Canadians who were expelled during the Second World War and communities in the present-day neighborhood. A common frame of reference, a form of dispossessive collectivism, takes shape in a tenuous Right to Remain premised on material, cultural, existential, and political struggles that have inflected life in the Downtown Eastside for over a century of colonial urbanization. The Right to Remain can provide a situated and integrative vocabulary for consolidating grassroots praxis across diverse social groupings and settings to address urban spatial claims (symbolically and materially) and to confront forces of gentrification driving dispossession processes in Vancouver and beyond.
Article
In this debate, we argue that scholars examining questions of value and exclusion in the planning process would benefit greatly by looking at the legal and spatial processes of land use and property more closely and recognizing the ways that law reflects and shapes social relations of place. We contend that the relationship between planning, property, and land use needs to be taken more seriously in order to challenge the conventional notion of land use as a predetermined, static, and taken for granted aspect of the urban landscape. We aim to open up new avenues for understanding urban processes of valuation and exclusion by examining existing understandings of the relationship between law and land use, and giving evidence for why scholars should pay attention to them. This debate builds on and complements recent debates on property, law, and everyday life in the city, and aims to continue unpacking the black box of land use. It calls for a renewed attention to the socio-legal aspects of the land use/property relationship to better understand urban processes of valorization and exclusion. © 2018
Article
The marginalized and impoverished Downtown Eastside neighbourhood of Vancouver, Canada has long been subjected to planning programs that have aimed to solve area problems through strategic government intervention. The 2011–2014 Local Area Planning Process, led by the City of Vancouver in consultation with local actors, represents the most recent of such programs. Despite the Local Area Planning Process’s stated goal of inclusive participation, the resultant Downtown Eastside plan transformed the political landscape of the neighbourhood and met with derision from stakeholders for its potential to generate dramatic capital-led transformations. In this paper, we critique participatory planning through a case study of the Local Area Planning Process. We utilize a lens of critical toponymy (the investigation of the historical and political implications of place naming) as a methodological tool to examine planning technologies of power and their mobilization through governmental processes. We deploy a novel approach to toponymy, drawing on assemblage theory, that presents toponymy as a radically open and dynamic process mobilized relationally through a multiplicity of discourses and materialities. Our case study demonstrates that processes of toponymic assemblage within the Downtown Eastside Local Area Planning Process worked to (1) generate new territorial conflicts, (2) depoliticize community activism, and (3) co-opt racialized and class-based histories of displacement and dispossession to stimulate “revitalization” (“Japantown”). On the other hand, we found that in unanticipated ways, these processes worked to stimulate anti-gentrification activism, alliances, and resistance. Our analysis of planning highlights how toponymic agency can service oppressive and marginalizing place-framings, but it can also have liberating effects – by inspiring unlikely alliances and counter-framings.
Article
In this article we seek to encourage geographers to consider the discursive dimensions of urbanization as a locus for activist inquiry into the right to the city. Drawing from literatures on urban branding and critical toponymy, we implicate the entrepreneurial phenomenon of neighbourhood branding as a primary enabler of urban gentrification and dispossession. Placing the discursive elision of local history, identity, and aspirations into dialectical relation to material infringements upon inhabitants’ collective rights, we suggest how both branding and activist counter-branding tactics may be fruitful sites for future empirical research on the right to the city.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.