Access to this full-text is provided by MDPI.
Content available from Molecules
This content is subject to copyright.
molecules
Article
Volatile Organic Compounds Emissions from
Luculia pinceana Flower and Its Changes at Different
Stages of Flower Development
Yuying Li 1,† , Hong Ma 1, †, Youming Wan 1, Taiqiang Li 1, Xiuxian Liu 1, Zhenghai Sun 2and
Zhenghong Li 1, *
1Research Institute of Resource Insects, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Kunming 650224, China;
liyuy_ing@163.com (Y.L.); hortscience@163.com (H.M.); wanyouming@126.com (Y.W.);
li_taiqiang@163.com (T.L.); lxx205@126.com (X.L.)
2School of Gardening, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China; sunzhenghai1978@163.com
*Correspondence: lzh4949@163.com; Tel.: +86-871-386-0032; Fax: +86-871-386-0027
† These authors contributed equally to this work.
Academic Editor: Derek J. McPhee
Received: 22 February 2016; Accepted: 18 April 2016; Published: 22 April 2016
Abstract:
Luculia plants are famed ornamental plants with sweetly fragrant flowers, of which
L. pinceana Hooker, found primarily in Yunnan Province, China, has the widest distribution. Solid
phase microextraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (SPME-GC-MS) was employed to
identify the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emitted from different flower development stages
of L. pinceana for the evaluation of floral volatile polymorphism. Peak areas were normalized as
percentages and used to determine the relative amounts of the volatiles. The results showed that
a total of 39 compounds were identified at four different stages of L. pinceana flower development,
including 26 at the bud stage, 26 at the initial-flowering stage, 32 at the full-flowering stage, and
32 at the end-flowering stage. The most abundant compound was paeonol (51%–83%) followed by
(E,E)-
α
-farnesene, cyclosativene, and
δ
-cadinene. All these volatile compounds create the unique
fragrance of L. pinceana flower. Floral scent emission offered tendency of ascending first and
descending in succession, meeting its peak level at the initial-flowering stage. The richest diversity
of floral volatile was detected at the third and later periods of flower development. Principal
component analysis (PCA) indicated that the composition and its relative content of floral scent
differed throughout the whole flower development. The result has important implications for future
floral fragrance breeding of Luculia.L. pinceana would be adequate for a beneficial houseplant and
has a promising prospect for development as essential oil besides for a fragrant ornamental owing to
the main compounds of floral scent with many medicinal properties.
Keywords:
Luculia; volatile organic compound; flower development; SPME-GC-MS; houseplant;
floral scent
1. Introduction
Luculia Sweet is a small genus of the family Rubiaceae, consisting of about five types of
small trees or shrubs. Three species occur in China, amongst which
Luculia pinceana Hooker,
found
primarily in Yunnan Province at altitudes between 600 and 3000 m has the widest distribution in
Nature [
1
–
3
]. Luculia can be easily recognized by its compact and long-term blooming (usually April
to November) inflorescences with white to pink, sweetly fragrant flowers with extremely long corolla
tubes.
On account
of the above-mentioned advantages, Luculia plants have been widely introduced
around the world. Studies in the past are often concentrated on its reproductive system, distyly,
Molecules 2016,21, 531; doi:10.3390/molecules21040531 www.mdpi.com/journal/molecules
Molecules 2016,21, 531 2 of 10
molecular biology and gametophyte development [
1
–
7
]. In addition, as a traditional medicinal and
ornamental plant, research work is underway concerning its cultivation and breeding.
Floral fragrance is one of the most important characteristics of ornamental plants or cut flowers,
because it may affect people’s health and mood [
8
]. Thus, the study of the composition of floral
scent and the breeding of new ornamental plant cultivars with sweet-smelling or pleasant fragrance
have become new trends of the development of plant breeding nowadays [
9
]. Although L. pinceana
possess the features of long-term blooming, sweet fragrance and has great potential in serving as an
indoor plant, research on its floral scent has not been carried out. In this work, the volatile component
emissions from different flower development stages of L. pinceana were analyzed by solid phase
microextraction coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry in order to build a foundation
for future work on Luculia floral fragrance breeding programs. Furthermore, the results could provide
a reference for determining whether Luculia species are suitable for indoor cultivation and extraction
of essential oil.
2. Results and Discussion
2.1. Identification of Scent Components
Thirty-nine VOCs were identified, representing more than 99% of the total emission of the
flowers. These volatiles grouped by their biochemical synthesis pathways [
10
] were described in
Table 1. A total of 18 same volatile compounds were shared at four different stages of flower
development of L. pinceana. Within these compounds, the main aroma-active one was paeonol
followed by (E,E)-
α
-farnesene, cyclosativene, and
δ
-cadinene. These compounds might dominate the
flavor for L. pinceana.
For instance,
paeonol has a specific odour; (E,E)-
α
-farnesene has a woody and
sweet odour;
δ
-Cadinene gives thyme, medicine and wood odour [
11
]. As one of these components,
γ
-muurolene has a smell of herb, wood and spice; methyl salicylate has a flavor with peppermint
aroma. The two compounds ranked second in relative content of VOCs at the full-flowering stage and
the end-flowering stage separately, so they could also influence the floral aroma.
The idea that L. pinceana has medicinal properties goes back hundreds of years in China [
12
].
Some of volatile compounds from flowers are pharmacologically active compounds. For example,
paeonol has several interesting biological activities, and it has been used as an anti-inflammatory,
analgesic, antioxidant, antidiabetic, and acaricidal agent [
13
,
14
]; cyclosativene demonstrates strong
anti-inflammatory, expectorant, antifungal effect [
15
];
γ
-muurolene and
δ
-cadinene have antifungal
properties. Despite the fact that essential oils are seldom encountered in the Rubiaceae [
16
], L. pinceana
would have a lot of potential for essential oil extraction according to the L. pinceana solid phase
microextraction results. Not only that, the essential oil of L. pinceana flowers might have special
therapeutic qualities in view of the above active ingredients among the volatile compounds.
Benzenoids were the most abundant amongst floral scent compounds, which content reached
at least 51%. The same scenario was noted in the floral essential oil of Randia matudae [
17
] compared
to other species of different genera in the family Rubiaceae. In contrast, the quantity and amount
of predominant compounds in the floral scent of Posoqueria latifolia [
18
], the leaf essential oil of
Rustia formosa and the essential oil from aerial parts of Anthospermum emirnense and A. perrieri were
sesquiterpenes [
16
,
19
]; the floral scent of Cephalanthus occidentalis,Warszewiczia coccinea and Gardenia
jasminoides were monoterpenes [
20
,
21
]; the floral scent of Coffea Arabica were aliphatics [
22
]. It has
been reported that the floral scent composition probably significantly varied amongst closely related
species, and our results partly support this view [10].
Molecules 2016,21, 531 3 of 10
Table 1. Volatile compounds identified in four different stages of L. pinceana flower development using SPME-GC-MS. (I) bud stage; (II) initial-flowering stage; (III)
full-flowering stage; and (IV) end-flowering stage.
Peak RT LRI Compounds CAS # Relative Content(%) ˘SD
I II III IV
Monoterpenes 1.48 ˘0.69b 0.15 ˘0.02b 1.63 ˘0.83b 7.91 ˘1.15a
1 8.37 904 (1S)-2,6,6-Trimethylbicyclo[3.1.1]hept-2-ene 7785-26-4 0b 0b 0b 0.45 ˘0.08a
2 8.75 918 Santolina triene 2153-66-4 0a 0a 0.32 ˘0.24a 0.34 ˘0.04a
3 9.46 943 α-Pinene 80-56-8 0b 0.05 ˘0.01b 0.26 ˘0.15b 2.11 ˘0.24a
4 10.84 994 Limonene 138-86-3 0a 0a 0.60 ˘0.43a 0.22 ˘0.03a
5 11.33 1012 3-Carene 13466-78-9 0.47 ˘0.48b 0.02 ˘0.00b 0.18 ˘0.12b 3.73 ˘0.61a
6 11.94 1034 (Z)-Verbenol 1845-30-3 0.05 ˘0.03a 0a 0.04 ˘0.02a 0a
7 12.37 1049 γ-Terpiene 99-85-4 0.03 ˘0.02a 0b 0b 0.03 ˘0.00a
8 12.64 1059 (E)-β-Ocimene 3779-61-1 0.87 ˘0.43a 0.02 ˘0.00b 0.09 ˘0.07b 0.61 ˘0.07ab
10 13.83 1102 α-Campholenal 91819-58-8 0b 0.02 ˘0.00b 0.07 ˘0.03a 0.08 ˘0.01a
11 14.36 1123 α-Santoline alcohol 90823-36-2 0.02 ˘0.01b 0.02 ˘0.00b 0.04 ˘0.03b 0.32 ˘0.06a
15 18.31 1295 Perilla alcohol 536-59-4 0.04 ˘0.02a 0.03 ˘0.00a 0.05 ˘0.02a 0.02 ˘0.00a
Aliphatics 2.46 ˘1.31a 0.53 ˘0.08a 1.46 ˘0.48a 2.81 ˘0.33a
12 14.84 1142 (3 E,5Z)-1,3,5-Undecatriene 51447-08-6 0.04 ˘0.02a 0a 0.06 ˘0.04a 0.03 ˘0.00a
14 17.39 1251 Nonanoic acid,ethyl ester 123-29-5 0c 0.01 ˘0.00b 0c 0.02 ˘0.00a
17 18.98 1318 Megastigma-4,6(E),8(E)-triene 51468-86-1 2.13 ˘1.28a 0.48 ˘0.07a 1.18 ˘0.53a 2.49 ˘0.31a
33 25.40 1577 Hexyl caprylate 1117-55-1 0.08 ˘0.05ab 0b 0.08 ˘0.02ab 0.10 ˘0.01a
34 25.62 1592 Pentanoic acid, 2,2,4-trimethyl-
3-carboxyisopropyl, isobutyl ester 959016-51-4 0.22 ˘0.13a 0.04 ˘0.00a 0.14 ˘0.02a 0.17 ˘0.02a
Benzenoids 51.61 ˘22.32a 85.88 ˘2.45a 80.05 ˘6.24a 75.38 ˘3.47a
13 15.08 1151 Methyl salicylate 119-36-8 0c 2.85 ˘0.45b 0c 4.81 ˘0.46a
23 22.43 1433 Paeonol 552-41-0 51.58 ˘22.36a 83.03 ˘2.91a 79.72 ˘6.14a 69.75 ˘4.00a
37 26.18 1639 Phenol,
2,6-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)-4-(1-methylpropyl)
14035-34-8 0a 0a 0.30 ˘0.36a 0.04 ˘0.00a
39 27.75 1791 Benzyl benzoate 120-51-4 0.03 ˘0.04b 0b 0.03 ˘0.01b 0.78 ˘0.07a
Sesquiterpenes 44.41 ˘21.11a 13.37 ˘2.34a 16.79 ˘5.16a 13.91 ˘1.99a
18 19.87 1346 α-Cubebene 17699-14-8 2.21 ˘1.42a 0.32 ˘0.06a 0.28 ˘0.26a 0.52 ˘0.07a
19 20.35 1362 Cyclosativene 22469-52-9 4.96 ˘2.66a 1.04 ˘0.15a 2.07 ˘1.17a 1.87 ˘0.16a
20 21.12 1386 Isoledene 95910-36-4 5.45 ˘3.16a 0.96 ˘0.20a 0.57 ˘0.73a 1.06 ˘0.12a
21 21.53 1399 Caryophyllene 87-44-5 1.34 ˘0.76a 0.17 ˘0.03a 0.15 ˘0.08a 0.23 ˘0.01a
22 21.89 1413 β-Ylangene 20479-06-5 0b 0.02 ˘0.00b 0.09 ˘0.03a 0b
Molecules 2016,21, 531 4 of 10
Table 1. Cont.
Peak RT LRI Compounds CAS # Relative Content(%) ˘SD
I II III IV
24 23.37 1467 (-)-β-Cadinene 523-47-7 2.34 ˘1.35a 0.38 ˘0.06ab 0.58 ˘0.20ab 0.12 ˘0.01b
26 23.59 1476 γ-Muurolene 30021-74-0 0b 1.35 ˘0.22b 5.86 ˘1.95a 1.46 ˘0.14b
27 23.85 1485 Cubebol 23445-02-5 5.48 ˘3.14a 0.77 ˘0.11a 0.56 ˘0.63a 0.46 ˘0.08a
28 24.06 1493 (E,E)-α-Farnesene 502-61-4 2.46 ˘1.47a 3.89 ˘1.10a 4.90 ˘4.38a 4.75 ˘0.98a
29 24.30 1503 4- epi-Cubebol 23445-02-5 4.76 ˘2.65a 0.91 ˘0.15a 0.73 ˘0.82a 2.29 ˘0.30a
30 24.45 1513 δ-Cadinene 483-76-1 10.98 ˘6.25a 2.61 ˘0.10ab 0.64 ˘0.75b 0.60 ˘0.08b
31 24.62 1525 Cadine-1,4-diene 16728-99-7 3.19 ˘1.84a 0.77 ˘0.11a 0.25 ˘0.31a 0.42 ˘0.03a
35 25.69 1597 Cedrol 77-53-2 0.11 ˘0.06a 0a 0.05 ˘0.03a 0a
36 25.81 1606 α-Acorenol 28296-85-7 0.12 ˘0.07a 0a 0.07 ˘0.03a 0.05 ˘0.01a
38 26.33 1652 Cubenol 21284-22-0 1.02 ˘0.58a 0.18 ˘0.04ab 0b 0.07 ˘0.01b
Unknowns 0.03 ˘0.02ab 0.07 ˘0.01a 0.08 ˘0.03a 0b
9 12.95 1070 Unknown-1 - 0b 0b 0.02 ˘0.01a 0b
16 18.60 1306 Unknown-2 - 0b 0b 0.05 ˘0.02a 0b
25 23.44 1470 Unknown-3 - 0b 0.07 ˘0.01a 0b 0b
32 25.27 1568 Unknown-4 - 0.03 ˘0.02a 0b 0b 0b
Values, expressed as mean
˘
SD of triplicate measurements, with different letters (a–c) in the same raw were significantly different according to Tukey’s test (p< 0.05). RT: retention
time; LRI: linear retention index; CAS #: Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Number.
Molecules 2016,21, 531 5 of 10
2.2. Dynamic Changes of Scent Emission in Different Development Floral Stages
L. pinceana flowers were selected on the basis of their botanical characteristics to evaluate the
dynamic changes and diversity of floral volatiles according to different development stages: bud
stage, initial-flowering stage, full-flowering stage, and end-flowering stage (Figure 1). Table 1and
Figure 2show the distinct changes in scent composition and concentration across flowering stages.
Scent components were drastically emitted at the initial-flowering stage, and then declined gradually
at the full-flowering stage. The amount of VOCs at the bud stage and the end-flowering stage was
obviously lower than that at the initial-flowering stage. The emission pattern of L. pinceana flowering
stages was different from Cananga odorata [
23
], Vanda Mimi Palmer [
24
], and Hosta flowers [
25
] of which
the fragrance ingredients were drastically emitted at the full-flowering stage and decreased greatly
afterwards. These results showed that the emissions at different flower stages evidently differed.
Investigation of the spatial and temporal patterns of gene expression has provided new information
on the factors regulating the emission of plant volatile compounds [26].
Molecules 2016, 21, 531 5 of 10
2.2. Dynamic Changes of Scent Emission in Different Development Floral Stages
L. pinceana flowers were selected on the basis of their botanical characteristics to evaluate the
dynamic changes and diversity of floral volatiles according to different development stages: bud
stage, initial-flowering stage, full-flowering stage, and end-flowering stage (Figure 1). Table 1 and
Figure 2 show the distinct changes in scent composition and concentration across flowering stages.
Scent components were drastically emitted at the initial-flowering stage, and then declined gradually
at the full-flowering stage. The amount of VOCs at the bud stage and the end-flowering stage was
obviously lower than that at the initial-flowering stage. The emission pattern of L. pinceana flowering
stages was different from Cananga odorata [23], Vanda Mimi Palmer [24], and Hosta flowers [25] of
which the fragrance ingredients were drastically emitted at the full-flowering stage and decreased
greatly afterwards. These results showed that the emissions at different flower stages evidently
differed. Investigation of the spatial and temporal patterns of gene expression has provided new
information on the factors regulating the emission of plant volatile compounds [26].
Figure 1. The morphological characteristics of L. pinceana flower in four different stages. (I) bud
stage; (II) initial-flowering stage; (III) full-flowering stage; and (IV) end-flowering stage.
Figure 2. Total ionic chromatogram of volatile components emitted from flowers of L. pinceana in
different stages. (I) bud stage; (II) initial-flowering stage; (III) full-flowering stage; and (IV)
end-flowering stage.
As for the bud stage, 26 volatile compounds belonging to different chemical classes were identified:
benzenoids (51.61%), sesquiterpenes (44.41%), aliphatics (2.46%), and monoterpenes (1.48%). The most
abundant compound was paeonol, accounting for about 52% of the total GC peak area, followed by
δ-cadinene (10.98%), cubebol (5.48%), isoledene (5.45%), and cyclosativene (4.96%). By contrast,
Figure 1.
The morphological characteristics of L. pinceana flower in four different stages. (
I
) bud stage;
(II) initial-flowering stage; (III) full-flowering stage; and (IV) end-flowering stage.
Molecules 2016, 21, 531 5 of 10
2.2. Dynamic Changes of Scent Emission in Different Development Floral Stages
L. pinceana flowers were selected on the basis of their botanical characteristics to evaluate the
dynamic changes and diversity of floral volatiles according to different development stages: bud
stage, initial-flowering stage, full-flowering stage, and end-flowering stage (Figure 1). Table 1 and
Figure 2 show the distinct changes in scent composition and concentration across flowering stages.
Scent components were drastically emitted at the initial-flowering stage, and then declined gradually
at the full-flowering stage. The amount of VOCs at the bud stage and the end-flowering stage was
obviously lower than that at the initial-flowering stage. The emission pattern of L. pinceana flowering
stages was different from Cananga odorata [23], Vanda Mimi Palmer [24], and Hosta flowers [25] of
which the fragrance ingredients were drastically emitted at the full-flowering stage and decreased
greatly afterwards. These results showed that the emissions at different flower stages evidently
differed. Investigation of the spatial and temporal patterns of gene expression has provided new
information on the factors regulating the emission of plant volatile compounds [26].
Figure 1. The morphological characteristics of L. pinceana flower in four different stages. (I) bud
stage; (II) initial-flowering stage; (III) full-flowering stage; and (IV) end-flowering stage.
Figure 2. Total ionic chromatogram of volatile components emitted from flowers of L. pinceana in
different stages. (I) bud stage; (II) initial-flowering stage; (III) full-flowering stage; and (IV)
end-flowering stage.
As for the bud stage, 26 volatile compounds belonging to different chemical classes were identified:
benzenoids (51.61%), sesquiterpenes (44.41%), aliphatics (2.46%), and monoterpenes (1.48%). The most
abundant compound was paeonol, accounting for about 52% of the total GC peak area, followed by
δ-cadinene (10.98%), cubebol (5.48%), isoledene (5.45%), and cyclosativene (4.96%). By contrast,
Figure 2.
Total ionic chromatogram of volatile components emitted from flowers of L. pinceana
in different stages. (
I
) bud stage; (
II
) initial-flowering stage; (
III
) full-flowering stage;
and (IV) end-flowering stage.
As for the bud stage, 26 volatile compounds belonging to different chemical classes were identified:
benzenoids (51.61%), sesquiterpenes (44.41%), aliphatics (2.46%), and monoterpenes (1.48%). The
Molecules 2016,21, 531 6 of 10
most abundant compound was paeonol, accounting for about 52% of the total GC peak area, followed
by
δ
-cadinene (10.98%), cubebol (5.48%), isoledene (5.45%), and cyclosativene (4.96%). By contrast,
relative content of (E)-
β
-ocimene (0.87%), (
´
)-
β
-cadinene (2.34%), cubebol (5.48%), and cubenol (1.02%)
at the bud stage were higher than that at the other stages of flower development.
As for the initial-flowering stage, 26 volatile compounds belonging to different chemical classes
were identified: benzenoids (85.88%), sesquiterpenes (13.37%), aliphatics (0.53%), and monoterpenes
(0.15%). The most abundant compound was paeonol, accounting for about 83% of the total GC
peak area, followed by (E,E)-
α
-farnesene (3.89%), methyl salicylate (2.85%), and
δ
-cadinene (2.61%).
On the other hand,
relative content of nonanoic acid, ethyl ester (0.01%) and methyl salicylate (2.85%)
in the initial-flowering stage were significantly lower than that in the end-flowering stage, but was
higher than that in the bud stage and the full-flowering stage. Relative content of hexyl caprylate was
significantly lower than that in the other flower development stages.
As for the full-flowering stage, 32 volatile compounds belonging to different chemical classes were
identified: benzenoids (80.05%), sesquiterpenes (16.79%), monoterpenes (1.63%), and aliphatics (1.46%).
The most abundant compound was paeonol, accounting for about 80% of the total GC peak area,
followed by
γ
-muurolene (5.86%), (E,E)-
α
-farnesene (4.90%), and cyclosativene (2.07%). In addition,
relative content of
β
-ylangene (0.09%) and
γ
-muurolene (5.86%) in the full-flowering stage were higher
than that in the other stages of flower development.
As for the end-flowering stage, 32 volatile compounds belonging to different chemical classes were
identified: benzenoids (75.38%), sesquiterpenes (13.91%), monoterpenes (7.91%), and aliphatics (2.81%).
The most abundant compound was paeonol, accounting for about 70% of the total GC peak area,
followed by methyl salicylate (4.81%), (E,E)-
α
-farnesene (4.75%), and 3-carene (3.73%). By contrast,
relative content of monoterpenes in the end-flowering stage were significantly higher than that in the
other stages of flower development, including (1S)-2,6,6-trimethylbicyclo[3.1.1]hept-2-ene (0.45%),
α
-pinene (2.11%), 3-carene (3.73%), and
α
-santoline alcohol (0.32%). Relative content of nonanoic acid,
ethyl ester (0.02%) and benzyl benzoate (0.78%) in the end-flowering stage were significantly higher
than that in the other stages of flower development.
The Bray-Curtis similarity index is a statistic used for comparing the similarity of two samples [
27
].
The mean Bray-Curtis similarity index was 74.57%
˘
11.53% (range: 61.81%~90.23%, n= 12, Table 2).
The initial-flowering stage was more similar to the full-flowering stage (BCS = 90.23%) than to the
end-flowering stage (BCS = 83.59%), and was largely dissimilar to the bud stage (BCS = 62.77%).
Across all the flower-life stages, the bud stage was distinctly dissimilar to the full-flowering stage
(BCS = 61.81%).
Variations of the volatile compositions were apparently involved in the maturity
stages of flower. The same phenomena are also observed in other plants, such as the flowers of Ocimum
citriodorum [
28
], Penstemon digitalis [
29
], and Cananga odorata [
23
]. In this study, the highest diversity of
floral volatiles was detected at the third and later periods of the flower development. Meanwhile, the
richness of volatile compounds showed an unimodal pattern between the number of VOCs and times
of flower development.
Table 2.
The Bray-Curtis similarity index (%) among different stages of L. pinceana flower development.
(I) bud stage; (II) initial-flowering stage; (III) full-flowering stage; and (IV) end-flowering stage.
I II III IV
I100
II 62.77 100
III 61.81 90.23 100
IV 65.32 83.59 83.71 100
To identify which volatiles contributed the most to the differences among the four flower stages
and to display the differences in a more visually appealing manner, the data on 39 volatile compounds
identified in L. pinceana at a full life-flower scale were analyzed by using principal component
Molecules 2016,21, 531 7 of 10
analysis (PCA). The first three components of PCA explained 37.43%, 26.34%, and 23.15% of the
variation, explaining ~87% of combined variance (Figure 3). Hereinto, volatiles that had high
positive scores on PC 1 included (
´
)-
β
-cadinene,
δ
-cadinene, cadine-1,4-diene, cubenol, cubebol,
isoledene, caryophyllene and
α
-cubebene, which were highly positively related to the bud stage
and the initial-flowering stage. Volatiles with high positive scores on PC 2 comprised
β
-ylangene,
γ-muurolene, unknown-1, unknown-2 and perilla alcohol, which were positively correlated with the
full-flowering stage and initial-flowering stage. Volatiles with high positive scores on PC 3 included
cis-verbenol,
α
-acorenol, (3E,5Z)-1,3,5-undecatriene and cedrol, which were negatively correlated
with the full-flowering stage. The remaining 22 volatiles were composed of common components,
megastigma-4,6(E),8(E)-triene, cyclosativene and 4-epi-cubebol. The principal component plots did not
overlap amongst the four flower developmental stages indicated that the composition and its relative
content of floral scent differed throughout the whole floral development, and the initial-flowering
stage was recommended the best harvesting time when the high level of VOCs and essential oil are
a concern.
Molecules 2016, 21, x 7 of 10
initial-flowering stage. Volatiles with high positive scores on PC 2 comprised β-ylangene,
γ-muurolene, unknown-1, unknown-2 and perilla alcohol, which were positively correlated with the
full-flowering stage and initial-flowering stage. Volatiles with high positive scores on PC 3 included
cis-verbenol, α-acorenol, (3E,5Z)-1,3,5-undecatriene and cedrol, which were negatively correlated
with the full-flowering stage. The remaining 22 volatiles were composed of common components,
megastigma-4,6(E),8(E)-triene, cyclosativene and 4-epi-cubebol. The principal component plots
did not overlap amongst the four flower developmental stages indicated that the composition and
its relative content of floral scent differed throughout the whole floral development, and the
initial-flowering stage was recommended the best harvesting time when the high level of VOCs and
essential oil are a concern.
(a) (b)
Figure 3. Principal component plot (PC1 vs. PC2 plots (a) and PC1 vs. PC3 plots (b)) for L. pinceana at
different stages of growth, showing correlations with volatiles (numbers correspond to those in Table 1).
(I) bud stage; (II) initial-flowering stage; (III) full-flowering stage; and (IV) end-flowering stage.
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Plant Materials
Fifteen fresh early flowering inflorescences from three L. pinceana plants (separation between plants
more than 100 m, five inflorescences per plant) were collected from the Nujiang Lisu Autonomous
Prefecture, Yunnan Province (25°58′N; 98°48′E) during their flourishing florescence on 10 November
2014, and inserted into deionized water before transported to the Research Institute of Resources
Insects, Chinese Academy of Forestry (RIRICAF) in Kunming. Subsequently, the inflorescences were
preserved at room temperature (25 ± 1 °C). The flowers were classified into four groups [23] according
to their botanical characteristics (Figure 1): (I) bud stage: buds complete closed, two or three days
before full bloom; (II) initial-flowering stage: semi-open petal, one day before full bloom; (III)
full-flowering stage: completely open petals, observable pistils and stamens; and (IV) end-flowering
stage: petals and calyxes withered, five or six day after full bloom.
3.2. Method
Volatile compounds of a complete flower was trapped immediately into a 20 mL capped
solid-phase microextraction vial at 8:00–11:00 a.m. Three replicate experiments (five flowers from
five inflorescences per replicate) were conducted using different plants randomly and the results
were means of three tests (fifteen flowers).
SPME analysis was performed by 100 μm polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) SPME fiber which was
highly sensitive in the analysis of scent components equipped with a manual SPME holder. After the
equilibration time, the fiber was exposed to the headspace of the capped vial to absorb volatile
compounds for 40 min at room temperature (25 ± 1 °C). The fiber was conditioned in the GC
injection port for 1 h at 250 °C before it was used for the first time. In addition, the empty capped vial
Figure 3. Principal component plot (PC1 vs. PC2 plots (a) and PC1 vs. PC3 plots (b)) for L. pinceana at
different stages of growth, showing correlations with volatiles (numbers correspond to those in Table 1).
(I) bud stage; (II) initial-flowering stage; (III) full-flowering stage; and (IV) end-flowering stage.
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Plant Materials
Fifteen fresh early flowering inflorescences from three L. pinceana plants (separation between
plants more than 100 m, five inflorescences per plant) were collected from the Nujiang Lisu
Autonomous Prefecture, Yunnan Province (25
˝
58
1
N; 98
˝
48
1
E) during their flourishing florescence
on 10 November 2014, and inserted into deionized water before transported to the Research Institute
of Resources Insects, Chinese Academy of Forestry (RIRICAF) in Kunming. Subsequently, the
inflorescences were preserved at room temperature (25
˘
1
˝
C). The flowers were classified into
four groups [
23
] according to their botanical characteristics (Figure 1): (I) bud stage: buds complete
closed, two or three days before full bloom; (II) initial-flowering stage: semi-open petal, one day before
full bloom; (III) full-flowering stage: completely open petals, observable pistils and stamens; and (IV)
end-flowering stage: petals and calyxes withered, five or six day after full bloom.
3.2. Method
Volatile compounds of a complete flower were trapped immediately into a 20 mL capped
solid-phase microextraction vial at 8:00–11:00 a.m. Three replicate experiments (five flowers from five
inflorescences per replicate) were conducted using different plants randomly and the results were
means of three tests (fifteen flowers).
Molecules 2016,21, 531 8 of 10
SPME analysis was performed by 100
µ
m polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) SPME fiber which
was highly sensitive in the analysis of scent components equipped with a manual SPME holder.
After the
equilibration time, the fiber was exposed to the headspace of the capped vial to absorb
volatile compounds for 40 min at room temperature (25
˘
1
˝
C). The fiber was conditioned in the GC
injection port for 1 h at 250
˝
C before it was used for the first time. In addition, the empty capped vial
was used as the blank control. A gas chromatograph-mass spectrometer (TRACE GC Ultra/ITQ900,
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) coupled with a DB-5MS capillary column (5% diphenyl
cross-linked 95% dimethylpolysiloxane, 30 m
ˆ
0.25 mm i.d., 0.25
µ
m film thickness. Agilent J & W
Scientific, Folsom, CA, USA) were used for the GC-MS analysis. Follow the SPME analysis, the fiber
with volatile compounds was exposed in the GC injector port for desorption at 260
˝
C for 1 min in
the splitless mode. Helium was used as a carrier gas at a constant flow-rate of 1 mL/min. The oven
temperature was programmed at 40 ˝C for 2 min, increasing 6 ˝C/min to 130 ˝C and then increasing
15
˝
C/min to 280
˝
C for 5 min. The split and splitless injection port were held at 260
˝
C and 200
˝
C in
split mode at a split ratio of 1:10. The temperature of the transfer line and the ion source were 200 ˝C
and 250
˝
C. The ionization potential of mass selective detector was 70 eV and the scan range was
50–650 amu.
3.3. Data Analysis
Identification of the volatile compounds was based on comparison of their mass spectra with
NIST08 database through Software TF Xcalibur 2.1.0 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Volatile compounds
were identified on the basis of their linear retention index (LRI) and by comparing their mass
spectra with a computerized MS-database using NIST 2008 library and published data (Pherobase,
http://www.pherobase.com/; NIST, http://webbook.nist.gov/chemistry/; The LRI and Odour
Database, http://www.odour.org.uk).
LRI were calculated by the use of a series of n-alkane standards (C6–C19) (Accu Standard, New
Haven, CT, USA). It is defined as Equation (1):
LRI “100 ˆn`100 ˆ ptx´tnq
tn`1´tn(1)
Peak areas were normalized as percentage and used to determine the relative amounts of the
volatiles. The normalization method from the Equation (2):
Relative content p%q “ area under peak
total peak area ˆ100 (2)
The data were expressed as mean
˘
standard deviation (SD) of triplicate measurements. One-way
analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s test in SPSS software was used to assess differences in
aroma compounds among four different stages of L. pinceana flower development. Volatile compounds
identified at a full life-flower scale were analyzed by using principal component analysis (PCA) and
Bray-Curtis similarity (BCS). PCA and BCS were carried out using PC-ORD for Windows (Version 5.0;
MjM Software, Gleneden Beach, OR, USA).
4. Conclusions
The present investigation showed that 39 VOCs were identified in all flower-life stages of
L. pinceana, amongst them, 26 at bud stage, 26 at initial-flowering stage, 32 at full-flowering stage,
and 32 at end-flowering stage. Benzenoids were the most abundant amongst floral scent compounds.
The amount of floral scent emission offered tendency of ascending first and descending in succession,
reaching peak level at initial-flowering stage. The highest diversity of floral volatile was detected at
the third and later periods of flower developmental stage. The odour evidently differed in composition
and its relative content in the four flower developmental stages. The second flower developmental
Molecules 2016,21, 531 9 of 10
stage was recommended as the best harvesting time if a high level of VOCs and essential oil are of
interest. L. pinceana could serve as beneficial houseplant in the future, besides as fragrant ornamental
according to the VOCs emitted from the flowers. Furthermore, L. pinceana has a promising prospects for
development as an essential oil source owing to the many medicinal properties of the main compounds
of the floral scent.
Acknowledgments:
We thank Wenwen Zhang, Yanlong Yang and Shuaifeng Li for assistance in data analysis. This
work was financially supported by Special Fund for Forest Scientific Research in the Public Welfare (201404705),
Technology Innovation Talent Project of Yunnan Province and Applied Basic Research Project of Yunnan Province
(2010ZC089).
Author Contributions:
Y.-Y.L., H.M., and Z.-H.L. conceived and designed the experiments; Y.-Y.L. and T.-Q.L.
performed the experiment; Y.-Y.L. and Y.-M.W. analyzed the data; X.-X.L. and Z.-H.S. contributed materials and
performed research; Y.-Y.L. and H.M. wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1.
Zhou, W.; Barrett, S.C.H.; Wang, H.; Li, D.-Z. Reciprocal herkogamy promotes disassortative mating in a
distylous species with intramorph compatibility. New Phytol. 2015,206, 1503–1512. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
2.
Ma, H.; Wang, Y.; Li, Z.H.; Wan, Y.M.; Liu, X.X.; Liang, N. A study on the breeding system of Luculia pinceana.
Forest Res. 2009,22, 373–378.
3.
Zhou, W.; Wang, H.; Li, D.Z.; Yang, J.B.; Zhou, W. Isolation and characterization of 13 microsatellite loci from
Luculia pinceana (Rubiaceae), a typical distylous species. Hortscience 2010,45, 840–841.
4.
Zhou, W.; Barrett, S.C.H.; Wang, H.; Li, D.Z. Loss of floral polymorphism in heterostylous Luculia pinceana
(Rubiaceae): A molecular phylogeographic perspective. Mol. Ecol.
2012
,21, 4631–4645. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
5.
Wan, Y.M.; Li, Z.H.; Ma, H.; Liu, X.X. Microsporogenesis and male gametophyte development of long-style
flower of Luculia pinciana (Rubiaceae). Acta Bot. Boreal-Occident. Sin. 2014,34, 1570–1575.
6.
Murray, B.G. Heterostyly and pollen-tube interactions in Luculia gratissima (Rubiaceae). Ann. Bot.
1990
,65,
691–698.
7.
Kang, W.Y.; Du, Z.Z.; Yang, X.S.; Hao, X.J. A new triterpene from Luculia pinciana Hook. J. Asian Nat. Prod. Res.
2005,7, 91–94. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
8.
Jo, H.; Rodiek, S.; Fujii, E.; Miyazaki, Y.; Park, B.J.; Ann, S.W. Physiological and psychological response to
floral scent. Hortscience 2013,48, 82–88.
9.
Dudareva, N.; Pichersky, E. Metabolic engineering of plant volatiles. Curr. Opin. Biotech.
2008
,19, 181–189.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
10.
Knudsen, J.T.; Eriksson, R.; Gershenzon, J.; Stahl, B. Diversity and distribution of floral scent. Bot. Rev.
2006
,
72, 1–120. [CrossRef]
11.
Flavornet and Human Odor Space. Available online: http://www.flavornet.org/flavornet.html (accessed on
22 February 2016).
12.
Kang, W.Y.; Wang, J.M.; Ji, Z.Q. Flavonoids in Luculia pinceana.Chem. Nat. Compd.
2008
,44, 644–645.
[CrossRef]
13.
Kim, H.K.; Tak, J.H.; Ahn, Y.J. Acaricidal activity of paeonia suffruticosa root bark-derived compounds
against dermatophagoides farinae and dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (Acari: Pyroglyphidae).
J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005,52, 7857–7861. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
14.
Huang, T.J.; Hong, C.; Liang, Y.C.; Lin, H.H.; Horng, J.C.; Kuo, Y.C.; Chen, C.W.; Tsai, F.Y.; Yen, S.C.; Chou, S.C.
Design, synthesis, and bioevaluation of paeonol derivatives as potential anti-HBV agents.
Eur. J. Med. Chem.
2015,90, 428–435. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
15.
Turkez, H.; Togar, B.; Stefano, A.D.; Taspınar, N.; Sozio, P. Protective effects of cyclosativene on H
2
O
2
-induced
injury in cultured rat primary cerebral cortex cells. Cytotechnology 2014,67, 299–309. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
16.
Rasoarivelo, S.T.R.; Grougnet, R.; Verite, P.; Lecsoe, M.; Butel, M.J.; Tillequin, F.; Guillou, C.R.; Deguin, B.
Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of the essential oils of Anthospermum emirnense and
Anthospermum perrieri (Rubiaceae). Chem. Biodivers. 2011,8, 145–154. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
17.
Setzer, W.N.; Noletto, J.A.; Lawton, R.O. Chemical composition of the floral essential oil of Randia matudae
from Monteverde, Costa Rica. Flavour Frag. J. 2006,21, 244–246. [CrossRef]
Molecules 2016,21, 531 10 of 10
18. Kaiser, R. Scents from rain forests. Chimia 2000,54, 346–363.
19.
Vieira, R.C.; Delprete, P.G.; Leitao, G.G.; Leitao, S.G. Anatomical and chemical analyses of leaf secretory
cavities of Rustia formosa (Rubiaceae). Am. J. Bot. 2001,88, 2151–2156. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
20.
Andersson, S.; Nilsson, L.A.; Groth, I.; Bergstrom, G. Floral scents in butterfly-pollinated plants: Possible
convergence in chemical composition. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2002,140, 129–153. [CrossRef]
21.
Meng, X.; Wang, Z.Y.; Lv, H. Constituents and bacteriostatic activity of volatile matter from four flower plant
species. Indian J. Agric. Res. 2010,44, 157–167.
22.
Stashenko, E.E.; Martinez, J.R.; Cardenas-Vargas, S.; Saavedra-Barrera, R.; Duran, D.C. Gc-ms study of
compounds isolated from Coffea arabica flowers by different extraction techniques. J. Sep. Sci.
2013
,36,
2901–2914. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
23.
Qin, X.W.; Hao, C.Y.; He, S.Z.; Wu, G.; Tan, L.H.; Xu, F.; Hu, R.S. Volatile organic compound emissions from
different stages of Cananga odorata flower development. Molecules
2014
,19, 8965–8980. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
24.
Mohd-Hairul, A.R.; Namasivayam, P.; Lian, G.E.C.; Abdullah, J.O. Terpenoid, benzenoid, and
phenylpropanoid compounds in the floral scent of Vanda Mimi Palmer. J. Plant Biol.
2010
,53, 358–366.
[CrossRef]
25.
Liu, Q.; Sun, G.; Wang, S.; Lin, Q.; Zhang, J.; Li, X. Analysis of the variation in scent components of Hosta
flowers by HS-SPME and GC–MS. Sci. Hortic. 2014,175, 57–67. [CrossRef]
26.
Dudareva, N.; Pichersky, E.; Gershenzon, J. Biochemistry of plant volatiles. Plant Physiol.
2004
,135, 1893–1902.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
27.
Yoshioka, P.M. Misidentification of the bray-curtis similarity index. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.
2008
,368, 309–310.
[CrossRef]
28.
Al-Kateb, H.; Mottram, D.S. The relationship between growth stages and aroma composition of lemon basil
Ocimum citriodorum vis. Food Chem. 2014,152, 440–446. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
29.
Burdon, R.C.F.; Raguso, R.A.; Kessler, A.; Parachnowitsch, A.L. Spatiotemporal floral scent variation of
Penstemon digitalis.J. Chem. Ecol. 2015,41, 641–650. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.
©
2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
(CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Available via license: CC BY
Content may be subject to copyright.