Formula One offers an interesting terrain to explore the gendered tensions that play out in a mega event/motorsport space. Indeed, despite some recent progressive transformations, Formula One’s long-standing intertwining of ‘glamour’ and hi-tech racing has arguably reflected and projected a set of ‘traditional’ gendered dynamics seemingly more aligned with stereotypical 1960s James Bond filmic gender representations, rather than a contemporary mega sporting event.
Formula One focuses on, emphasises and embellishes masculine attributes, with these ‘macho racers’ understood and reified through their bravado, technical mastery and risk-taking endeavours. Nevertheless, the ‘real’ presence of risk, bravado or mastery is debatable in contemporary times, with Formula One the safest it has ever been. Originating in 1950, Formula One’s too frequent driver fatalities ushered in a raft of safety features since the mid-1960s that have been incrementally updated over time. Thus, while the spectre of death may loom due to wheel-to-wheel racing at speeds in excess of 200mph, the reality is a safe and largely sanitised sport, with only four fatalities occurring since 1982.
Similarly, elements of driver skill, mastery and risk-taking have also been reduced. Due to the current regulations and restrictions, drivers often conserve their cars, tyres, engines and fuel-usage rather than ‘race’ one another during a Grand Prix. As such, five-time world champion Lewis Hamilton has bemoaned the lack of effort, risk or fear for drivers and asserts that contemporary Formula One has become ‘too easy’. Further encroaching into Formula One’s space is the appeal of Esports and sim-racing which, through its rapid progression, development and commercialisation, is offering an alternative ‘virtual’ motorsport avenue replete with championships and ratification by official organisations. Hence, the once sacred space for displays of masculine bravado, mastery and risk-taking is being negated in contemporary Formula One.
Meanwhile, marginalisation, trivialisation and sexualisation persists for women. Traditionally Formula One (and most other categories), relied upon ‘grid girls’ to allegedly add ‘glamour’ to motorsport through their appearance and ornamental roles as sexy props/trophies for the ‘masculine’ drivers. In 2018, Formula One removed ‘grid girls’, proclaiming it to be an allegedly outdated practice, while reducing the overt emphasis on sexualised female ‘eye-candy’ roles. However, while arguably a positive progressive step, the lack of female driving opportunities remains a barrier. Only five female drivers have ever raced in Formula One, the last in 1992, while test driver roles have limited and curtailed, rather than offered pathways, to securing a drive in Formula One. Hence, test drivers such as Susie Wolff and Simona de Silvestro left Formula One disillusioned by the lack of future opportunities, while Carmen Jorda had a seemingly ornamental ‘development driver’ role with Lotus F1 and Renault geared towards a media emphasis on her appearance rather than driving ability. In an interrelated development, Formula W was created in 2019 as a female-only series to enhance female driving prospects, but has been met with a polarised reception to date. It is these gendered dynamics, tensions and representations surrounding Formula One that will be the focus of this chapter.