Content uploaded by Erik Peper
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Erik Peper on Apr 24, 2016
Content may be subject to copyright.
Biofeedback ÓAssociation for Applied Psychophysiology & Biofeedback
Volume 44, Issue 1, pp. 42–49 www.aapb.org
DOI: 10.5298/1081-5937-44.1.03
FEATURESFEATURES
Abdominal SEMG Feedback for Diaphragmatic
Breathing: A Methodological Note
Erik Peper, PhD, BCB,
1
Annette Booiman, MSCT, BCB,
2
I-Mei Lin, PhD, BCB,
3
Richard Harvey,
PhD,
1
and Jasmine Mitose
1
1
Institute for Holistic Health Studies, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA;
2
Biofeedback in Beweging, Wormer, the Netherlands;
3
Department of
Psychology, Kaohsiung Medical University, Taiwan
Keywords: surface electromyography, respiration, diaphragmatic breathing, pelvic floor pain
Diaphragmatic breathing from a developmental perspective
is a whole-body process. During exhalation, the abdominal
wall contracts, and during inhalation, the abdominal wall
relaxes. This pattern is often absent in many clients who tend
to lift their chest when they inhale and do not expand their
abdomen. Even if their breathing includes some abdominal
movement, in many cases only the upper abdomen above the
belly button moves while the lower abdomen shows limited
or no movement. This article describes factors that contribute
to the lack of abdominal movement during breathing, as well
as a methodology to record the surface electromyography
(SEMG) activity from the lower abdominal muscles (exter-
nal/internal abdominal oblique and transverse abdominis).
Strategies are presented to teach clients how to engage the
lower abdominal muscles to facilitate effortless breathing.
For example, when the person exhales, the lower abdominal
muscles contract to flatten the abdomen and push the
diaphragm upward, and these muscle relax during inhalation
to allow the diaphragm to descend. Lower abdominal SEMG
recording can also be used as a surrogate indicator for SEMG
activity from the pelvic floor. To enhance activation of the
lower abdominal muscles during a breathing cycle, specific
exercises are described. In summary, lower abdominal SEMG
feedback is a useful strategy to facilitate complete abdominal
involvement during breathing.
Background
When asking clients to demonstrate inhaling diaphragmat-
ically, many lift their chest and do not expand their
abdomen, even though they think their stomach/abdomen
expanded. In other cases, during exhalation, their chest goes
down and their abdomen goes out, a pattern known as
paradoxical breathing. Even if their breathing includes
abdominal movement, in many cases only the upper
abdomen above the belly button moves while the lower
abdomen shows limited or no movement.
Factors that contribute to the lack of abdominal
movement during breathing include:
1. ‘‘Designer jean syndrome’’ (the modern girdle): The
abdomen is constricted by a waist belt, tight pants, or
slimming underwear (Peper & Tibbitts, 1994).
2. Self-image: The person tends to pull his or her abdomen
inward in an attempt to look slim and attractive.
3. Defense reaction: The person unknowingly tenses the
abdominal wall—a flexor response—in response to
perceived threats (e.g., worry, external threat, loud
noises, feeling unsafe). Defense reactions are commonly
seen in clients with anxiety, panic, or phobias.
4. Learned disuse (Peper et al., 2015): The person covertly
learned to inhibit any movement in the abdominal wall
to protect themselves from experiencing pain because of
a. Prior abdominal injury/surgery (e.g., hernia surgery,
appendectomy, cesarean operation)
b. Abdominal pain (e.g., irritable bowel syndrome,
recurrent abdominal pain, ulcers, acid reflux)
c. Pelvic floor pain (e.g., pelvic floor pain, pelvic girdle
pain, vulvodynia, sexual abuse)
d. Low back pain
5. Inability to engage abdominal muscles because of the
lack of muscle tone.
a. The abdominal wall relaxes as a biological signal of
defenselessness. This is sometimes observed in
clients who feel defeated, depressed, or hopeless.
The person will predominantly breathe shallowly in
their chest with episodic sighs.
b. Age or a sedentary life. The person has limited
abdominal muscle strength and has reduced activa-
tion of muscles around the trunk during movement.
Whether the lower abdominal muscles are engaged or not
(either by chronic tightening or lack of muscle activation),
AdaptedfromPeper,E.,Booiman,A.C.,Lin,I-M.,Harvey,R.,Mitose,
J. (2015) Abdominal SEMG feedback for diaphragmatic breathing: A
methodological note. Poster presented at the 46th Annual Meeting of
the Association for Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, Austin,
Texas, March 11–14, 2015.
42
Spring 2016 |Biofeedback
the resultant breathing pattern tends to be shallow, rapid,
irregular, and punctuated with sighs in their chest. Over
time, participants may not able to activate or relax the lower
abdominal muscles during the respiratory cycle.
Breathing from a developmental perspective is a whole-
body process, and whole-body involvement in respiration
can usually be observed in infants and young children. When
a person feels safe, optimum breathing should be effortless
(van Dixhoorn, 1998, 2007). During inhalation, the abdom-
inal wall expands and the lower abdominal muscles—
transverse abdominis and abdominal oblique—relax, which
allows the diaphragm to move caudally to increase lung
volume in the thorax. During exhalation, the transverse
abdominis and abdominal oblique muscles tighten to pull the
abdomen inward, flattening the abdomen so that the
abdominal circumference decreases, which pushes the
diaphragm cranially upward to reduce lung volume in the
thorax (Booiman & Peper, 2013; Peper et al., 2015; Talasz,
Kalchschmid, Kofler, & Lechleitner, 2012; Talasz, Kofler,
Kalchschmid, Pretterklieber, & Lechleitner, 2010).
Diaphragmatic breathing is the intrinsic respiratory
pattern of mammals, as illustrated by a dog standing on
all fours. During exhalation, the abdomen wall contracts
upward against gravity, and during inhalation, the abdom-
inal wall relaxes, allowing the abdomen to drop down.
Moreover, during early embryological development, the
respiratory tract and the urinary system develop from the
same tissue. This connection is still present during
breathing. For example, when a person with normal
functional breathing exhales through pursed lips while
making a hissing sound (psssssss), the muscles of the pelvic
floor and lower abdomen will slightly tighten (Hodges,
Sapsford, & Pengel, 2007; Sapsford et al., 2001; van
Dixhoorn, 2007).
1
When people improve their breathing
patterns, numerous disorders are ameliorated, such as
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (Cahalin, Braga,
Matsuo, & Hernandez, 2002; Gosselink, Wagenaar, Rijs-
wijk, Sargeant, & Decramer, 1995), asthma (Thomas et al.,
2003), and pelvic floor disorders (Zivkovic et al., 2012).
Conventional recording of respiration with strain gauges
placed around the waist records the expansion of the abdomen
during inhalation or constriction during exhalation; however,
it usually records the upper abdomen, and in many people, it
does not reflect the movement of the lower abdominal wall.
Purpose
The purpose of this methodological note is to describe a
methodology to record the surface electromyography
(SEMG) activity from the lower abdominal muscles (exter-
nal/internal abdominal oblique and transverse abdominis) to
monitor and to teach engagement of these lower abdominal
muscles to facilitate effortless, whole-body breathing. Using
this methodology, the participants can once again learn how
to activate the lower abdominal muscles to flatten the
abdominal wall during exhalation, thereby pushing the
diaphragm upward, and then, during inhalation, relax the
muscles of the abdominal wall to expand the abdomen to
allow the diaphragm to descend. The location of the muscles
and electrode location are illustrated in Figure 1.
Lower Abdominal SEMG Electrode
Placement
Electrode Placement Options
Narrow electrodes placement. The Triode electrode is
placed about 1 cm to the midline from the spina iliaca
anterior superior (SIAS), as shown in Figure 1. The
participant is asked to loosen material around the waist
(e.g., beltline) and fold the clothing down on the side where
the electrode is placed, as shown in Figure 2. This works
well with people who are slim and do not have much
adipose tissue or tissue folds. The band-pass filter is usually
set between 20 and 500 Hz as the electrocardiogram (EKG)
artifact is minimal; however, if the EKG artifact is large, the
band-pass filter is set between 100 and 200 Hz (Peper,
Gibney, Tylova, Harvey, & Combatalade, 2008).
Wide electrodes placement. One single active electrode is
placed 1 cm from the right SIAS, and the other active
electrode is placed on the other side 1 cm inward from the
left SIAS, as shown in Figure 1. The reference electrode is
placed midway between the two active electrodes. The
band-pass filter is set between 100 and 200 Hz to reduce the
EKG artifact. This electrode placement works well with
people having significant adipose tissue or tissue folds
(Peper et al., 2008).
Observations
For healthy participants who breathe diaphragmatically,
there was a close correspondence between breathing activity
measured by respiratory strain gauges and the SEMG
sensor placed on the lower abdominal wall during slow,
effortless breathing.
2
The SEMG activity increases during
1
For additional information about effortless breathing, see the
comprehensive work on whole-body breathing by van Dixhoorn
(1998, 2007).
2
The detailed methodology for monitoring muscle activity with SEMG
and respiration with strain gauges are described in the book Biofeedback
Mastery (Peper et al., 2008). The physiological recordings for this
methodological note were done with a Procomp Plus Infiniti system
with Biograph Infinity 6.1 software (Thought Technology, Ltd) using
MyoScan-Pro
TM
sensors to record the SEMG.
43
Biofeedback |Spring 2016
Peper et al.
exhalation and decreases during inhalation, as shown in
Figure 3.
The abdominal breathing pattern is often affected by the
posture of the trunk. When the person sits collapsed with a
posterior tilt of the pelvis, the lower abdomen muscles are
more difficult to activate during exhalation as shown in
Figure 4.
Challenges in Recording SEMG from the Lower
Abdomen
The participant has excessive adipose tissue under the
abdominal wall, which reduces the SEMG signal recorded
with narrow placement electrode. Solution: Explore the
use of wide placement electrodes.
Slouching posture of the client may increase tissue folds
in that area and push the triode away from the muscle,
thereby decreasing the signal amplitude. Solution: Have
the person sit erect.
Clients with little abdominal fat who have experienced
weight fluctuations (e.g., significant weight loss or
pregnancy) may have loose skin that moves away from
the muscles, especially with a slouching posture, which will
reduce the signal. Solution: Use wide placement electrodes
or let the person lie down on his or her back on a couch/
floor.
Clothing may interfere with sensor placement and shift
during position changes. Solution: Have person wear
clothing that allows electrodes to be discretely placed on
the abdominal wall and discuss how clothing may
restrict abdominal movement during breathing.
The absence of lower abdominal muscle tension has been
associated with a history of abdominal pain and pelvic floor
Figure 1. Approximate transverse and external abdominal oblique placement of surface electromyography (SEMG) sensors for detecting lower SEMG activity. From
http://www.muscledudelife.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/abdominal-muscles-anatomy.jpg.
Figure 2. Placement of a triode electrode on the lower abdomen.
44
Spring 2016 |Biofeedback
Abdominal SEMG Feedback for Diaphragmatic Breathing
Figure 3. Correspondence between respiratory strain gauge changes and surface electromyography (SEMG) activity during breathing. When the person exhales,
the lower abdominal SEMG activity increases, and when the person inhales, the SEMG decreases.
Figure 4. Effect of posture on abdominal surface electromyography recording.
45
Biofeedback |Spring 2016
Peper et al.
discomfort in which the muscle activity is inhibited because
of learned disuse (Gilbert & Chaitow, 2012; Haugstad et al.,
2008; Haugstad, Kirste, Leganger, Haakonsen, & Haugstad,
2011). Low chronic abdominal muscle tension has been
associated with the chronic triggering of the defense
reaction (Haugstad et al., 2008). For many clients with this
chronic low-tension pattern, especially those who are
fearful and guarding, learning to relax the lower abdominal
wall during inhalation as well as learning to increase
slightly the tension of the abdominal wall muscles during
exhalation is challenging. After mastering the skill, these
individuals often report feeling more relaxed and safe.
The abdominal SEMG placement measures the low
abdominal muscle function and may also be used as a
surrogate indicator for SEMG activity from the pelvic floor,
as measured by an internal probe shown in Figure 5.
For clients with pelvic floor pain such as vulvodynia or
those with sexual abuse history, using lower abdominal
SEMG recording may be a noninvasive and less threatening
approach to teaching lower abdomen and pelvic floor
relaxation (Peper et al., 2015). It may avoid retraumatizing
that could occur when placing sensors in the vagina or anus.
The benefits of learning slower lower abdominal breathing
include facilitating circulation and lymph fluid and venous
blood return in the abdomen. At the same time, the slower
resonant frequency breathing would enhance the sympa-
thetic-parasympathetic balance and reduce sympathetic
arousal and trigger-point activity (Lehrer, Vaschillo, &
Vaschillo, 2000).
Self-Practices to Increase Lower Abdominal Movement
During Slower Breathing
The following practices can be used by the client to facilitate
lower abdominal breathing (Klemmetsen, 2005; Jonker-
Kaars Sijpensteijn, 1996):
1. Holding the hands against the lower abdomen
Clients place their hands below their belly button with
the outer edge of hands resting on the groin. During
inhalation, they practice bringing their lower abdomen/
belly into their hands so that the person can feel the lower
abdomen expanding. During exhalation, they pull their
lower abdomen inward and away from their palms, as
shown in Figure 6.
Figure 5. Comparison between low and normal abdominal breathing while recording surface electromyography (SEMG) from the transverse/obliques and an
internally placed vaginal EMG probe.
Figure 6. Hands placed below the belly button to sense the movement of the
lower abdomen.
Figure 7. Position of fingers to feel the lower abdominal tension during
exhalation and relaxation (expansion) during inhalation.
46
Spring 2016 |Biofeedback
Abdominal SEMG Feedback for Diaphragmatic Breathing
2. Feeling the muscles contracting
Clients place their fingertips just inside the SIAS on the
abdomen with a light pressure, as shown in Figure 7. While
exhaling, they focus on feeling the muscles of the abdomen
slightly tighten and relax/soften during inhalation. Clients
can also practice this covertly during the day by putting
their fingers/hands in the pockets of their pants and feeling
the muscles of their own abdomen; nobody will know that
they are doing their home practice.
3. Cats and dogs
The client is on all fours on the floor on their hands and
knees. The arms and upper thighs are perpendicular from
the trunk and floor. During exhalation, the client tightens
the abdominal muscles upward from the pubic bone to the
ribcage (like pulling up a zipper) while curling the back and
tucking the head down. During inhalation, the client relaxes
and expands the lower abdomen and stomach while arching
the back and lifting the head up, as shown in Figure 8.
4. Pelvic rocking
The client sits erect on a chair on the ‘‘sit’’ bones of the
pelvis. Then the client moves the pelvis slowly backward with
use of the abdominal muscles, so he or she sits behind the sit
bones, and then moves the pelvis in the forward position
while relaxing the abdominal muscles so that at the end of the
movement, the client will sit in front of his or her sit bones.
The client slowly rocks the pelvis forward and backward
several times with the use of the abdominal muscles, as
shown in Figure 9.
This pelvic rocking exercise was so helpful! I am realizing that
my hyperventilation was intertwined with my inability to rock
the pelvis back and forward. Now I am able to move my
pelvis, my breathing problems are becoming better too.
Conclusion
Lower abdominal SEMG feedback is a useful tool to
facilitate complete abdominal involvement during breath-
ing. It is especially useful when teaching clients to breath
slowly at resonant frequency so that sympathetic and
parasympathetic balance can be enhanced. This methodol-
ogy can be used by psychologists, physical therapists, and
biofeedback practitioners who neither want nor are allowed
Figure 8. Illustration of ‘‘cats and dogs’’ practice. During inhalation, the lower abdomen expands while arching the back and lifting the head up; during exhalation,
the lower abdomen is moved upward from the pubic bone to the ribcage while curling the back and tucking the head down.
Figure 9. Illustration of pelvic rocking while sitting on a tool or at the edge of a chair.
47
Biofeedback |Spring 2016
Peper et al.
to directly interact using internal placements of sensors for
pelvic floor problems.
Lower abdominal SEMG feedback is also useful in
retraining breathing for people with depression, rehabilita-
tion after pregnancy, operations in the abdomen or chest
(e.g., cesarean surgery, hernia, or appendectomy opera-
tions), anxiety, hyperventilation, stress-related disorders,
difficulty becoming pregnant or maintaining pregnancy,
pelvic floor problems, headache, low back pain, and lung
diseases.
Biofeedback might be the single thing that helped me the
most. When I began to focus on breathing, I realized that it
was almost impossible for me since my body was so
tightened. However, I am getting much better at breathing
diaphragmatically because I practice every day. This has
helped my body and it relaxes my muscles, which in turn
help reduce the vulvar pain.
References
Booiman, A. P., & Peper, E. (2013). Ademen bezien vanuit de
psychofysiologische benadering. Physios, Praktische Naschol-
ing over Fysiotherapie, 5(3), 4–13.
Cahalin, L. P., Braga, M., Matsuo, Y., & Hernandez, E. D. (2002).
Efficacy of diaphragmatic breathing in persons with chronic
obstructive pulmonary disease: A review of the literature.
Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention,
22, 7–21.
Gilbert, C. & Chaitow, L. (2012). Breathing and chronic pelvic
pain: Connections and rehabilitation features. In L. Chaitow &
R. Lovegrove (Eds.), Chronic pelvic pain and dysfunction (pp.
193–226). New York: Elsevier.
Gosselink, R. A. A. M., Wagenaar, R. C., Rijswijk, H., Sargeant,
A. J., & Decramer, M. L. (1995). Diaphragmatic breathing
reduces efficiency of breathing in patients with chronic
obstructive pulmonary disease. American Journal of Respira-
tory and Critical Care Medicine,151, 1136–1136.
Haugstad, G. K., Haugstad, T. S., Kirste, U. M., Leganger, S.,
Wojniusz, S., Klemmetsen, I., & Malt, U. F. (2008). Continuing
improvement of chronic pelvic pain in women after short-term
Mensendieck somatocognitive therapy: Results of a 1-year
follow-up study. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gyne-
cology,199, 615.e1–e8.
Haugstad, G. K., Kirste, U., Leganger, S., Haakonsen, E., &
Haugstad, T. S. (2011). Somatocognitive therapy in the
management of chronic gynaecological pain. A review of the
historical background and results of a current approach.
Scandinavian Journal of Pain,2, 124–129.
Hodges, P. W., Sapsford, R., & Pengel, L. H. M. (2007). Postural
and respiratory functions of the pelvic floor muscles. Neuro-
urology and Urodynamics,26, 362–371.
Jonker-Kaars Sijpensteijn, M. L. A. (1996). De methode Mensen-
dieck. Utrecht, the Netherlands: Wetenschappelijke uitgeverij
Bunge.
Klemmetsen, I. (2005). The Mensendieck system of functional
movements. Den Haag, the Netherlands: Boom uitgevers.
Lehrer, P. M., Vaschillo, E., & Vaschillo, B. (2000). Resonant
frequency biofeedback training to increase cardiac variability:
Rationale and manual for training. Applied Psychophysiology
and Biofeedback,25, 177–191.
Peper, E., Gibney, K., Tylova, H., Harvey, R. H., & Combatalade,
D. (2008). Biofeedback mastery: An experiential teaching and
self-training manual. Wheat Ridge, CO: Association of
Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback.
Peper, E., Gilbert, C. D., Lin, I. M., & Harvey, R. (2015). Did you
ask about abdominal surgery or injury? A learned disuse risk
factor for breathing dysfunction. Biofeedback, 43, 173–179.
Peper, E., Martinez Aranda, P., & Moss, D. (2015). Vulvodynia
treated successfully with breathing biofeedback and integrated
stress reduction: A case report. Biofeedback, 43, 103–109.
Peper, E., & Tibbetts, V. (1994). Effortless diaphragmatic
breathing. Physical Therapy Products,6(2), 67–71.
Sapsford, R. R., Hodges, P. W., Richardson, C. A., Cooper, D. H.,
Markwell, S. J., & Jull, G. A. (2001). Co-activation of the
abdominal and pelvic floor muscles during voluntary exercises.
Neurourology and Urodynamics,20, 31–42.
Talasz, H., Kalchschmid, E., Kofler, M., Lechleitner, M. (2012).
Effects of multidimensional pelvic floor muscle training in
healthy young women. Archives of Gynecology and Obstet-
rics,285, 709–715. doi:10.1007/s00404-011-2039-y
Talasz, H., Kofler, M., Kalchschmid, E., Pretterklieber, M., &
Lechleitner, M. (2010). Breathing with the pelvic floor?
Correlation of pelvic floor muscle function and expiratory
flows in healthy young nulliparous women. International
Urogynecology Journal,21, 475–481.
Thomas, M., McKinley, R. K., Freeman, E., Foy, C., Prodger, P., &
Price, D. (2003). Breathing retraining for dysfunctional
breathing in asthma: A randomized controlled trial. Thorax,
58, 110–115.
van Dixhoorn, J. (1998). Ontspanningsinstructie. Principes en
oefeningen. Maarssen, the Netherlands: Elsevier/Bunge.
van Dixhoorn, J. (2007). Whole body breathing. In P. M. Lehrer,
R. L. Woolfolk, & W. E. Sime (Eds.), Principles and practices of
stress management (pp. 291–332). New York: Guilford.
Zivkovic, V., Lazovic, M., Vlajkovic, M., Slavkovic, A., Dimi-
trijevic, L., Stankovic, I., & Vacic, N. (2012). Diaphragmatic
breathing exercises and pelvic floor retraining in children with
dysfunctional voiding. European Journal of Physical and
Rehabilitation Medicine,48, 413–421.
48
Spring 2016 |Biofeedback
Abdominal SEMG Feedback for Diaphragmatic Breathing
Eric Peper Annette Booiman I-Mei Lin
Richard Harvey Jasmine Mitose
Correspondence: Erik Peper, PhD, Institute for Holistic Healing Studies/Department of Health Education, San Francisco State University, 1600
Holloway Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94132, email: epeper@sfsu.edu; web: www.biofeedbackhealth.org; blog: www.peperperspective.com.
49
Biofeedback |Spring 2016
Peper et al.