In their commentary on our study of ideology and political intolerance (Crawford & Pilanski, 2013, hereafter CP), Nosek and Lindner (2013) claim that we replicated the findings of Lindner and Nosek (2009, hereafter LN). Specifically, they claim that a) we replicated their main effect of ideology on political intolerance, such that conservatives are more intolerant than liberals, b) we replicated
... [Show full abstract] their interaction effect of ideology and target political objective on political intolerance, such that people are more intolerant of their political opponents, and c) our finding that threat mediates the relationship between ideology and intolerance is similar to their finding that speech agreement mediates the relationship between ideology and speech protection. In fact, none of these claims are true—they are based on misinterpretations of both our data and their own. Rebutting these claims first requires a brief primer on how to interpret main effects and interactions in multiple regression, and then a discussion of how Nosek and Lindner mischaracterize the findings of both LN and CP, claim by claim.