ArticlePublisher preview available
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract and Figures

While prior ecolabel research suggests that consumers’ trust of ecolabel sponsors is associated with their purchase of ecolabeled products, we know little about how third-party certification might relate to consumer purchases when trust varies. Drawing on cognitive theory, and a stratified random sample of more than 1,200 consumers, we assess how third-party certification relates to consumers’ use of ecolabels across different program sponsors. We find that consumers’ trust of government and environmental NGOs to provide credible environmental information encourages consumers’ use of ecolabels sponsored by these entities, and consumers do not differentiate between certified vs. uncertified ecolabels in the presence of trust. By contrast, consumers’ distrust of private business to provide credible environmental information discourages their use of business association sponsored ecolabels. However, these ecolabels may be able to overcome consumer distrust if their sponsors certify the ecolabels using third-party auditors. These findings are important to sponsors who wish develop ecolabels that are more credible to consumers, and thus encourage more widespread ecolabel use.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Third-Party Certification, Sponsorship, and Consumers’ Ecolabel
Use
Nicole Darnall
1
Hyunjung Ji
2
Diego A. Va
´zquez-Brust
3
Received: 12 September 2015 / Accepted: 23 March 2016 / Published online: 8 April 2016
Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016
Abstract While prior ecolabel research suggests that
consumers’ trust of ecolabel sponsors is associated with
their purchase of ecolabeled products, we know little about
how third-party certification might relate to consumer
purchases when trust varies. Drawing on cognitive theory
and a stratified random sample of more than 1200 con-
sumers, we assess how third-party certification relates to
consumers’ use of ecolabels across different program
sponsors. We find that consumers’ trust of government and
environmental NGOs to provide credible environmental
information encourages consumers’ use of ecolabels
sponsored by these entities, and consumers do not differ-
entiate between certified versus uncertified ecolabels in the
presence of trust. By contrast, consumers’ distrust of pri-
vate business to provide credible environmental informa-
tion discourages their use of business association-
sponsored ecolabels. However, these ecolabels may be able
to overcome consumer distrust if their sponsors certify the
ecolabels using third-party auditors. These findings are
important to sponsors who wish develop ecolabels that are
more credible to consumers, and thus encourage more
widespread ecolabel use.
Keywords Ecolabel Environmental label Ecolabel
sponsor Consumer perceptions Ecolabel credibility
Third-party certification Verification
Introduction
Increased global interest in environmental issues (Euro-
barometer 2014) has caused consumers to increasingly
consider the environment in their purchasing decisions.
Markets have responded by producing more than 450
ecolabels worldwide that are sponsored and administered
by government, environmental non-government organiza-
tions (NGOs), or business associations (Ecolabel Index
2016). Ecolabels are symbols or seals that are designed to
help consumers identify environmentally superior products
and services and increase their confidence in making pro-
environmental purchases (Tarkiainen and Sundqvist 2005;
Nuttavuthisit and Thøgersen 2015).
Despite their increased prevalence, only one in five eco-
minded consumers report acting on their environmental
preferences by purchasing ecolabeled products (Euro-
barometer 2014). One explanation for consumers’ lack of
ecolabel use is their skepticism that an ecolabel is a cred-
ible signal of a product’s superior environmental charac-
teristics (Atkinson and Rosenthal 2014; Dendler 2014;
Nuttavuthisit and Thøgersen 2015). Additionally, con-
sumers appear to be more distrustful of ecolabels sponsored
by business associations and therefore are less likely to use
them in their purchasing decisions (Darnall et al. 2012).
Rather, consumers tend to prefer ecolabels that are devel-
oped by sponsors they believe to be more trustworthy, such
&Nicole Darnall
ndarnall@asu.edu
Hyunjung Ji
mmang37@gmail.com
Diego A. Va
´zquez-Brust
d.a.vazquez@rhul.ac.uk
1
School of Public Affairs, School of Sustainability, Arizona
State University, 411 N. Central Ave., Suite 400, MC 3720,
Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA
2
Department of Political Science, University of Alabama,
303 ten Hoor Bldg, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA
3
School of Management, Centre for Research Sustainability,
Royal Holloway University of London, Egham,
Surrey TW20 0EX, UK
123
J Bus Ethics (2018) 150:953–969
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3138-2
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
... Consumers' trust in ecolabels has proved to depend on their confidence in the issuing institution and their awareness of the certifications (Gorton et al. 2021). Therefore, ecolabels issued by institutional bodies, policymakers or independent auditors prevent opportunistic behavior and information asymmetries to the detriment of consumers (Darnall et al. 2018;Watanabe et al. 2021). As a result, we acknowledge that a third-party certified source of information would further reduce the indecisions that hinder purchasing and improve WTP (Boyer et al. 2021;Gorton et al. 2021;Pretner et al. 2021;van Weelden et al. 2016). ...
Article
Full-text available
Circular products are among the most promising options for sustainable consumption. However, it is not always foolproof that diverse stakeholders would be inclined to choose them. While researchers have lately increased their focus on determining which factors affect circular product purchases, which drivers differ between corporate buyers and final consumers remains unclear. Drawing on the subjective norms construct, rooted in the theory of planned behavior, this study identifies elements that influence final consumer and corporate buyers' circular product buying behavior. First, we advance the mediating role of subjective norms and product information seeking in conditioning their circular products' purchasing behavior. Corporate buyers proved to be more exposed to subjective norms, preferring to seek more information on circular products and proving more trust towards brands' communication about circular products. Secondly, we tested the moderating role of introducing an ecolabel that showcases a circularity score. We conducted four studies, three in the paper and one in the appendix, relying on CB‐SEM from surveys and experimental designs. As a result, this study delivers insightful implications for academics, practitioners and policymakers by shedding light on the different demeanors of corporate buyers compared to final consumers regarding circular product purchases.
... This risks undermining sustainability initiatives, as professionals may struggle to differentiate between legitimate environmental efforts and marketing-driven green claims. Strengthening trust in eco-labeling requires enhanced transparency, independent verification, and harmonization of certification standards to reduce ambiguity and improve decision-making reliability 16,42 . ...
Article
Full-text available
Greenwashing—the deliberate exaggeration or fabrication of environmental claims—undermines trust, disrupts transparency, and poses a significant barrier to genuine progress toward sustainability. This scenario-based experimental study examines whether purchasing managers, key stakeholders in organizational procurement, can reliably differentiate between greenwashed and certified sustainable products. Using three carefully designed purchasing scenarios—laptops, safety gloves, and copy paper—responses were collected from 465 purchasing managers across the EU, a region notable for its regulatory emphasis on eco-certifications. The findings reveal no statistically significant differences in willingness to pay (WTP) for products with greenwashed claims versus those backed by stringent certifications, with average WTP values varying only slightly between groups. These findings highlight a critical vulnerability to greenwashing, even among experienced professionals, raising concerns about the credibility of sustainability claims in influencing procurement decisions. The study underscores the need for systemic reforms, including the standardization of certification systems and enhanced decision-making tools, to mitigate greenwashing’s pervasive impact and foster authentic corporate sustainability.
... Research on eco-labels can be helpful in terms of showing environmental considerations. Eco-labels, which are symbols or seals, assist consumers in identifying products and services that are environmentally superior, thereby boosting their confidence in making eco-friendly purchases (Darnall et al., 2018). Studies on eco-labeling in relation to tourism have shown that four conditions are necessary: (1) broad coverage and penetration, (2) well-defined and transparent entry criteria, (3) independent audits, and (4) penalties for non-compliance (Buckley, 2002). ...
Article
Although the goal of ecotourism is to balance tourism with environmental conservation, there are concerns regarding the excessive promotion of tourism. One measure to prevent excessive use is to certify tourism operators. However, certification is inconsistent with regional autonomy, and because it is a voluntary initiative, there may be limitations in its scope. Accordingly, we conducted a case study of a certified eco-tour guide system for Amami-Oshima Island in Japan to determine whether a certification system for eco-tour guides would promote the appropriate use of the environment. This study included interviews with stakeholders and a questionnaire survey administered to certified guides. To obtain certification, guides must complete a training course and possess guide experience. In addition to securing work, the guides also obtained certifications to improve their quality. Guides work at a higher frequency than in other areas. However, concerns arose because of the lack of penalties for self-regulation agreed upon by the Council and the presence of unqualified guides. We conclude that penalties and legal systems should be introduced for malicious cases. In addition, discussions of use regulations should involve both guides and residents in the negotiation process, and a third-party organization should be engaged to provide accreditation, ensuring that the impact of regulations is properly assessed.
... Aligned with cognitive theory, consumers tend to form purchasing decisions using a passive evaluation process when faced with a trustworthy information provider [33], whereas they are more likely to employ an evaluative approach when the source is perceived as less credible [10]. In this context, individual trust relates to organic food producers who may, due to their own interests, provide less trustworthy details, leading consumers to look for more credible sources of information [34]. ...
Article
Full-text available
The role of blockchain technology in the organic food supply chain remains largely unexplored. This study leverages insights from the stimulus-organism-response theory to examine how blockchain-driven traceability and transparency affect consumer trust and organic food purchasing behavior. Moreover, it also explores how personal trust and system trust mediate and interact harmoniously and disparately with each other to result in consumers’ purchase decisions. Utilizing a purposive sample of 5,326 consumers in Vietnam, the recent study adopts multiple linear regression and polynomial regression with response surface analysis to assess the hypothesized model. The results reveal that both blockchain-driven traceability and transparency significantly enhance personal trust and system trust, which in turn positively influence organic food purchase behavior. The study also finds that a balance between personal and system trust is crucial for maximizing purchase behavior, while an imbalance in either direction leads to a decrease in purchase behavior. Personal and system trust is also found to significantly mediate the effects of blockchain features on purchase behavior. Based on the findings, several key recommendations have been provided for producers, regulatory bodies, and policymakers.
Article
Extant theory in corporate sustainability highlights challenges in coordinating organizational action to “fit” the complex functioning of ecological systems. Our qualitative study shows how a certification organization in the U.S. wine industry developed and enacted a “bridging capacity,” through which it tailored program standards to cultivate members’ attention to ecological issues within and across spatial and temporal scales. Drawing on data covering a 25-year period, we uncover three mechanisms associated with this bridging capacity: sourcing, decoding , and converting . We develop a theoretical model showing how a bridging capacity enables a certification organization to develop standards that reflect and respond to the complexity of the ecological systems in which its members operate. While certification programs have been important for signaling a commitment to sustainability to stakeholders, our work adds that by developing a bridging capacity, such programs can add further value by supporting coordinated, system approaches to corporate sustainability.
Article
The exponential growth of the market for convenience foods has added facilitation to many people’s lives; however, consumers continue to hold mixed views regarding the quality and safety of such foods. Marketers should explore persuasive strategies to counter these negative perceptions and encourage the consumption of convenience foods. This study conducted two online experiments from the perspective of visual persuasion and design to examine the effects of typeface and the inclusion of brand certification in label designs on consumers’ purchase intentions, guided by the dual processing model. The findings indicate that handwritten labels are more effective than machine-written labels are in enhancing consumers’ purchase intentions of convenience foods. These enhanced purchase intentions are related to stronger perceptions of a human presence and confidence in the product when handwritten typeface is used. In addition, a moderated serial mediation analysis revealed that brand certification labels, which serve as a traceable source of product quality and credibility, positively influence consumers’ perceptions of human presence, further boosting consumers’ confidence in a product and their purchase intention. The positive effect of handwritten typeface is particularly pronounced when a label does not include a brand certification, and the presence of such a certification tends to weaken the effect of typeface. These findings clarify the application of the dual processing model and offer theoretical insights and practical guidance for packaging design and marketing strategies for convenience foods.
Chapter
This chapter evaluates consumer preferences for agricultural products with eco-label schemes and discusses effective agricultural policies for increasing the consumption of environmentally friendly agricultural products. Various eco-label schemes have been practiced in Japan to support eco-friendly agriculture. This chapter compares two third-party certified eco-labels and a self-declaration scheme. An online questionnaire and choice experiment are conducted, and mixed logit and latent class logit models are used to consider the heterogeneity of consumer preferences. The interesting results are as follows. First, consumer preferences for eco-labeled agricultural products are heterogeneous. Approximately 61% of consumers highly evaluate third-party certified eco-labels and the self-declaration scheme. Second, the characteristics of consumers with heterogeneous preferences are identified. The consumer group that highly evaluates eco-labels will likely include females, older people, high-income individuals, and those with knowledge about environmentally friendly agriculture and experience purchasing environmentally friendly agricultural products. Third, consumers highly value third-party certified eco-labels compared to the self-declaration scheme. The WTP values for third-party certified eco-labels are about 1.4 to 3.5 times that for self-declarations. Based on the results, the effectiveness of third-party certification eco-labels is emphasized to expand the consumption of environmentally friendly agricultural products, and the potential effectiveness of self-declaration schemes is discussed.
Chapter
This chapter examines eco-labels as key tools for green communication, helping consumers align purchasing decisions with sustainability. It provides an overview of eco-label types and the regulations ensuring their credibility, while analyzing the roles of key stakeholders—consumers, producers, and third-party organizations. Through case studies, the chapter highlights the successful brand adoption of eco-labels, showcasing their integration into marketing strategies to promote sustainability and build trust. Moreover, it addresses the barriers to broader adoption, focusing on challenges such as low consumer awareness and limited understanding of the sustainability messages eco-labels convey.
Chapter
Full-text available
Increasingly, consumers are becoming more knowledgeable about the environment and reflecting this knowledge in their decisions to buy green products. While previous research on the topic has generally examined green consumption related to a single product label, numerous questions exist about why consumers choose various green products and services. We address these concerns by examining individuals' actual green consumption as it relates to their trust of various sources to provide them with environmental information, environmental knowledge, and personal affect towards the environment. These relationships are studied for a sample of more than 1,200 UK residents using multiple regression techniques. We show that individuals' total green consumption is related to their trust of various sources to provide them with environmental information, environmental knowledge, and personal affect towards the environment. These findings have important implications to policy-makers and businesses alike as greater efforts are made to encourage more widespread green consumption.
Article
Full-text available
Two meta-analyses were conducted to Investigate the effectiveness of the Fishbein and Ajzen model in research to date. Strong overall evidence for the predictive utility of the model was found. Although numerous instances were identified in which researchers overstepped the boundary conditions initially proposed for the model, the predictive utility remained strong across conditions. However, three variables were proposed and found to moderate the effectiveness of the model. Suggested extensions to the model are discussed and general directions for future research are given.
Article
This article synthesizes the large but diverse literature on organizational legitimacy, highlighting similarities and disparities among the leading strategic and institutional approaches. The analysis identifies three primary forms of legitimacy: pragmatic, based on audience self-interest; moral, based on normative approval: and cognitive, based on comprehensibility and taken-for-grantedness. The article then examines strategies for gaining, maintaining, and repairing legitimacy of each type, suggesting both the promises and the pitfalls of such instrumental manipulations.