ArticlePDF Available

International Appeal: Scientists call for protection from non-ionizing electromagnetic field exposure



We are scientists engaged in the study of biological and health effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields (EMF). Based upon peer-reviewed, published research, we have serious concerns regarding the ubiquitous and increasing exposure to EMF generated by electric and wireless devices. These include–but are not limited to–radiofrequency radiation (RFR) emitting devices, such as cellular and cordless phones and their base stations, Wi-Fi, broadcast antennas, smart meters, and baby monitors as well as electric devices and infra-structures used in the delivery of electricity that generate extremely-low frequency electromagnetic field (ELF EMF).
International Appeal: Scientists call for protection from
non-ionizing electromagnetic field exposure
To: His Excellency Ban Ki-moon, Secretary-General of the United Nations;
Honorable Dr. Margaret Chan, Director-General of the World Health Organization; Honorable Achim
Steiner, Executive Director of the U.N. Environmental Programme; U.N. Member Nations
Summary. We are scientists engaged in the study of biological and health effects of non-ionizing electro-
magnetic fields (EMF). Based upon peer-reviewed, published research, we have serious concerns regarding
the ubiquitous and increasing exposure to EMF generated by electric and wireless devices. ese include–but
are not limited to–radiofrequency radiation (RFR) emitting devices, such as cellular and cordless phones and
their base stations, Wi-Fi, broadcast antennas, smart meters, and baby monitors as well as electric devices
and infra-structures used in the delivery of electricity that generate extremely-low frequency electromagnetic
field (ELF EMF).
EUR. J. ONCOL.; Vol. 20, n. 3/4, pp. 180-182, 2015 © Mattioli 1885
Specific topics
Scientific basis for our common concerns
Numerous recent scientific publications have
shown that EMF affects living organisms at levels
well below most international and national guidelines.
Effects include increased cancer risk, cellular stress,
increase in harmful free radicals, genetic damages,
structural and functional changes of the reproductive
system, learning and memory deficits, neurological
disorders, and negative impacts on general well-being
An introduction to the International EMF Scientist Appeal
e current issue of the European Journal of Oncology contains a document the “International
EMF Scientist Appeal” ( that addresses the concerns of 215 scientists from 40 nations
about the adverse health effects on the human population exposed to non-ionizing electromagnetic fields
(EMF) from extremely-low frequency to radiofrequency. e Appeal has been submitted to the United
Nations, to two of its sub-agencies, the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations
Environmental Programme (UNEP), and to all UN Member Nations.
We note that the overall weight of evidence reported in peer-reviewed, scientific studies strongly
supports greater precautionary measures be taken to reduce or eliminate EMF exposure.
Coordinating and Advisory Committee for the “International EMF Scientist Appeal” (Martin
Blank, Magda Havas, Elizabeth Kelley, Henry Lai, and Joel Moskowitz). We can be reached through
Elizabeth Kelley at
10-internationa appeal 180 16/12/15 13:56
International appeal 181
in humans. Damage goes well beyond the human race,
as there is growing evidence of harmful effects to both
plant and animal life.
ese findings justify our appeal to the United
Nations (UN) and, all member States in the world, to
encourage the World Health Organization (WHO) to
exert strong leadership in fostering the development
of more protective EMF guidelines, encouraging pre-
cautionary measures, and educating the public about
health risks, particularly risk to children and fetal de-
velopment. By not taking action, the WHO is failing
to fulfill its role as the preeminent international public
health agency.
Inadequate non-ionizing EMF international
e various agencies setting safety standards have
failed to impose sufficient guidelines to protect the
general public, particularly children who are more vul-
nerable to the effects of EMF.
e International Commission on Non-Ion-
izing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) established
in 1998 the “Guidelines For Limiting Exposure To
Time-Varying Electric, Magnetic, and Electromag-
netic Fields (up to 300 GHz)” (1). ese guidelines
are accepted by the WHO and numerous countries
around the world. e WHO is calling for all na-
tions to adopt the ICNIRP guidelines to encourage
international harmonization of standards. In 2009,
the ICNIRP released a statement saying that it was
reaffirming its 1998 guidelines, as in their opinion,
the scientific literature published since that time
“has provided no evidence of any adverse effects be-
low the basic restrictions and does not necessitate an
immediate revision of its guidance on limiting ex-
posure to high frequency electromagnetic fields (2).
ICNIRP continues to the present day to make these
assertions, in spite of growing scientific evidence to
the contrary. It is our opinion that, because the IC-
NIRP guidelines do not cover long-term exposure
and low-intensity effects, they are insufficient to
protect public health.
e WHO adopted the International Agency for
Research on Cancer (IARC) classification of extreme-
ly low frequency electromagnetic field (ELF EMF)
in 2002 (3) and radiofrequency radiation (RFR) in
2011 (4). is classification states that EMF is a pos-
sible human carcinogen (Group 2B). Despite both IARC
findings, the WHO continues to maintain that there
is insufficient evidence to justify lowering these quan-
titative exposure limits.
Since there is controversy about a rationale for
setting standards to avoid adverse health effects, we
recommend that the United Nations Environmental
Programme (UNEP) convene and fund an indepen-
dent multidisciplinary committee to explore the pros
and cons of alternatives to current practices that could
substantially lower human exposures to RF and ELF
fields. e deliberations of this group should be con-
ducted in a transparent and impartial way. Although
it is essential that industry be involved and cooperate
in this process, industry should not be allowed to bias
its processes or conclusions. is group should provide
their analysis to the UN and the WHO to guide pre-
cautionary action.
Collectively we also request that:
1. children and pregnant women be protected;
2. guidelines and regulatory standards be strength-
3. manufacturers be encouraged to develop safer
4. utilities responsible for the generation, trans-
mission, distribution, and monitoring of elec-
tricity maintain adequate power quality and
ensure proper electrical wiring to minimize
harmful ground current;
5. the public be fully informed about the potential
health risks from electromagnetic energy and
taught harm reduction strategies;
6. medical professionals be educated about the
biological effects of electromagnetic energy and
be provided training on treatment of patients
with electromagnetic sensitivity;
7. governments fund training and research on
electromagnetic fields and health that is inde-
pendent of industry and mandate industry co-
operation with researchers;
10-internationa appeal 181 16/12/15 13:56
International appeal
8. media disclose experts’ financial relationships
with industry when citing their opinions re-
garding health and safety aspects of EMF-
emitting technologies; and
9. white-zones (radiation-free areas) be estab-
e list of signatories and their affiliations is
available at
10-internationa appeal 182 16/12/15 13:56
... They believe that NIR causes cancer, reproductive problems, and a range of symptoms that have been classified as electrohypersensitivity (EHS) or idiopathic environmental intolerance according to the WHO; that children and pregnant women are particularly vulnerable; and that many of the chronic illnesses common in our society are due, in part, to electromagnetic pollution or electrosmog 3 exposure. They base this belief on the numerous studies documenting adverse biological and health effects of low-level NIR (Lee et al., 1996;Havas, 2000Havas, , 2013Carpenter andSage, 2007, 2012;Levitt and Lai, 2010;Blank et al., 2015). ...
... Steps that need to be taken by individuals as well as by governing bodies and industry are provided in the EMF Scientist Appeal (Blank et al., 2015). We know enough to act and we need to take steps to reduce public exposure if we are to minimize an emerging health crisis. ...
Full-text available
This paper attempts to resolve the debate about whether non-ionizing radiation (NIR) can cause cancer–a debate that has been ongoing for decades. The rationale, put forward mostly by physicists and accepted by many health agencies, is that, “since NIR does not have enough energy to dislodge electrons, it is unable to cause cancer.” This argument is based on a flawed assumption and uses the model of ionizing radiation (IR) to explain NIR, which is inappropriate. Evidence of free-radical damage has been repeatedly documented among humans, animals, plants and microorganisms for both extremely low frequency (ELF) electromagnetic fields (EMF) and for radio frequency (RF) radiation, neither of which is ionizing. While IR directly damages DNA, NIR interferes with the oxidative repair mechanisms resulting in oxidative stress, damage to cellular components including DNA, and damage to cellular processes leading to cancer. Furthermore, free-radical damage explains the increased cancer risks associated with mobile phone use, occupational exposure to NIR (ELF EMF and RFR), and residential exposure to power lines and RF transmitters including mobile phones, cell phone base stations, broadcast antennas, and radar installations.
... Although ionizing radiations, e.g., X-rays, are prime examples of electromagnetic waves interacting with living matter [20,21], a staggering amount of evidence has consistently shown over the years that non-ionizing radiations, i.e., radiations incapable of ionizing matter, can actually affect cells and tissues [22,23]. After realizing that the EMFs generated by peculiar electrical wiring or high-power radars could be associated with neoplastic disease [24,25], increasing efforts have been progressively devoted to both reduce the risks associated with the overwhelming EMF pollution that permeates our society [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41], and use EMFs to benefit patients' health. ...
Full-text available
Periodontal regeneration is a complex goal, which is commonly pursued with a combination of surgical techniques, biomaterials, and bioactive compounds. One such compound is enamel matrix derivative (EMD), a medical substance that is extracted from porcine tooth germs and which contains several protein fractions with BMP-and TGF-β-like action. Activation of TGF-β signaling is required for EMD activity on cells and tissues, and a growing body of evidence indicates that EMD largely relies on this pathway. As low frequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) have long been investigated as a tool to promote bone formation and osteoblast activity, and because recent studies have reported that the effects of EMFs on cells require primary cilia, by modulating the presence of membrane-bound receptors (e.g., for BMP) or signal mediators, it can be hypothesized that the application of EMFs may increase cell sensitivity to EMD: as TGFBR receptors have also been identified on primary cilia, EMFs could make cells more responsive to EMD by inducing the display of a higher number of receptors on the cellular membrane.
... As Markov and Grigoriev stated, "Today standards do not take into account the real pollution of the environment with non-ionizing radiation" (Markov and Grigoriev, 2013). Hundreds of researchers, including many scientists supporting to this appeal, have documented that many different types of acute and chronic diseases are induced by RFR levels far below international guidelines non-thermal (Blank, Havas, Kelley, Lai, & Moskowitz, 2015). Biological effects occur even at nearzero power levels. ...
An epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a process that leads an epithelial cell to change by gaining a mesenchymal phenotype. During organogenesis, embryogenesis and metastasis of tumor cells, cells differentiate into epithelial or mesenchymal states via EMT and MET processes. Transforming Growth Factor Beta (TGFβ) and the signaling pathway is the most important EMT stimulator. TGFβ plays a prominent role as a tumor suppressor and a metastatic agent in cancer progression. From embryonic development to homeostasis, TGFβ and its downstream regulators in the signaling pathway are crucial that deficiencies and mutations in the gene or on the pathway cause developmental defects, immunological diseases, and poor prognosis in cancer patients.
... The major Tech companies have championed 5G as the solution to slow bandwidth speed and stated it works up to 10 times faster than 4G. Nevertheless, 5G is gaining some opposition from the medical, environmental and technology sectors (Kelley, 2019). One issue is the possible harm excessive levels of radiation used for 5G output known as, radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation (RF EMR), can exact on all living species (Russell, 2018). ...
Full-text available
The purpose of this article is to present possible psychological consequences of using ICT, especially online communication applications, during the Coronavirus lockdown. With humans already testing their mental fortitude due to the enforced isolation period, the paper proposes that predictors of technology phobia such as computer anxiety may also arise. The root causes of technophobia are centred around computer dependency, data surveillance, information overload, poor user experience and personality type. Furthermore, scenarios such as a complete internet shutdown, the development of social distancing apps and the introduction of 5G are also dissected within the article. Finally, the reader is presented with ideas on feasible solutions and coping mechanisms in dealing with technology-related stress. It seems evident that there exists a need for academia and governmental entities to work in- tandem in order to implement common-sense legislation.
... Later, cancer in childhood who was exposed to 60 Hz magnetic field and biological effects of EMFs were published [3 -5]. Numerous studies have been conducted adverse biological and health effects of low-level non-ionizing radiation [6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. Latest study has been published in 2017 indicating that free radical damage explains the increased cancer risks associated with residential exposure to power lines, occupational exposure to extremely low frequency (ELF) and radio frequency (RF) transmitters [13]. ...
Full-text available
A major factor of anxiety and speculation come from electromagnetic fields which represent one of the most common and fastest increasing environmental issues. The purpose of this work is to examine existing electric and magnetic fields’ levels in a typical house and an office at very low frequency, and comparing the measurement results with the prior studies and also with the ICNIRP standard limits. This study also comprises the three phase conductors’ electromagnetic fields analysis at a point. As a result, it is observed that the measured values are approaching to the calculated ones.
During the recent years the problem about the monitoring of electromagnetic field pollution attracts the increasing attention of both scientists and national authorities. The topic of the problem lies in the increasing interest towards the local, regional, and global aspect study and control of the electromagnetic pollution. The need of receiving regular and accurate information about the changes in environmental electromagnetic radiation appeared. This paper analyzed the cause of natural and man-made electromagnetic environment pollution, pointed out the harm of public health and the city normal production and living order and the city sustainable development. This paper suggested that comprehensive treatment measures should be taken to solve the problem of electromagnetic environment pollution in cities including the reasonable planning and layout, the real powerful supervision, the advertisement and education, and the high level of protection technology. This paper has been written to show analysis of results measured in the urban zone. The measurement is realised by instruments ESM-100 and PCE – EM 29. For this reason, in this study electromagnetic radiation (EMR) measurements were conducted on four different days in Tuzla. Measured EM field levels are compared with the limits that are determined by the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) and World Health Organization WHO.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.