... Since 1998, there have been more than 25 reviews or special reports published discussing Cordyceps, and 14 of them have focused on C. sinensis. For example, these studies have emphasized: terminology, life strategy, and ecology;[5] traditional uses and medicinal potential in Sikkim;[10] the reliability of fungal materials;[2] ecology, trade, and development in Tibet;[15] production and sustainability on the Tibetan Plateau and in the Himalayas;[16] origin of scientific name, morphological characteristics, micromorphological characteristics of the teleomorph, identification, hosts, and synonymy;[6] ethnomycological use, collection, discovery, protection, and the range of diseases treated in Northern Yunnan Province in China;[9] host spectrum, distribution, artificial rearing host, infection technology, and substitute products;[17] clinical efficacy for chronic kidney diseases;[18] markers and analytical methods for quality control;[19] history, use, and implications;[20] pharmacological functions;[21] safety, effects on the nervous system, glucose metabolism, effects on the respiratory, hepatic, cardiovascular, immune systems, immunological disease, inflammatory conditions, cancer, and diseases of the kidney;[22] and in vitro and in vivo studies, open-label and double-blinded clinical trials on the respiratory, renal, hepatic, cardiovascular, immunological, and nervous systems, and in its effects on cancer, glucose metabolism, inflammatory conditions, and toxicological studies.[23] Two papers have focused on C. militaris, placing emphasis on: biological aspects including the host range, mating system, cytology and genetics, insect- and noninsect nutritional requirements, environmental influence on stroma development, and commercial development;[24] and active principles and culture techniques.[25] ...