Few, if any, rulers in twelfth-century Christendom attracted the amount of
attention devoted to the Byzantine Emperor Andronikos I. Although
Andronikos ruled for less than three years, his rise to power, reign and downfall
made a vivid impression on contemporaries. In contrast to medieval chroniclers,
modern historians have taken little interest in this emperor. Indeed, the
relatively large
... [Show full abstract] number of Latin and Old French accounts of his reign have been
completely disregarded or dismissed by scholars as being of limited value for
the reconstruction of historical events. All these narratives, however, are
important. They not only provide significant insight into how a harsh and
oppressive rule was viewed in the Latin world in the late twelfth and early
thirteenth centuries, but also reveal what information about the Byzantine
Empire was transmitted from the East to the West at the time, and how it
travelled. Moreover, the striking similarities between them raise important
questions about historical memory in twelfth- and thirteenth-century
Christendom. This article illustrates the richness of the Latin and Old French
accounts of Andronikos’s rise to power, reign and death, while also tracing the
shaping of the Byzantine ruler’s image and the growth of his legend over time.