Chapter

The lyric poem during and after apartheid

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the author.

Abstract

Poetics and politics of the lyric poem Distinguished by the expression of personal observations and feelings, the lyric poem is an introspective and self-reflexive form that seeks to give direct voice to individual consciousness, articulating its singular patterns of cognitions, desires and doubts. This self-expressive impulse is closely associated with Romanticism, and specifically with the Romantic projection of the internal life of a subject who is estranged from existing political institutions and social structures, turns to nature and natural philosophy for alternative systems of meaning and value, and takes this subjective revolt as the very material of poetry, striving, against the limits of language itself, for spontaneous and sincere utterance. For all their conceptual and stylistic differences, Wordsworth’s ‘Tintern Abbey’ and Shelley’s ‘Adonais’ have in common the self-expressive impulse of a subject who seeks in nature an aesthetic understanding of the mind’s symbolic relation with the real. Whilst Romantic aspiration towards authentic individual expression has been subjected to the dislocations and ironic perspectives of modernism, it has continued to haunt modernism as an elusive possibility, a transitory achievement of consciousness, even where, as in Eliot’s ‘Waste Land’, the myths that inform western culture are invoked in fragmentary form to constitute an aesthetic of loss. A more systematic challenge to Romantic subjectivity was formulated by late twentieth-century literary theory, specifically poststructuralist deconstructions of the expressive self and post-Marxist exposures of the ideological investments of poetic discourse. The latter, in particular, was influential in determining attitudes to the lyric poem in the apartheid period.

No full-text available

Request Full-text Paper PDF

To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the author.

Article
Full-text available
This intervention highlights the question of literary evaluation and aesthetics in contemporary South African poetry in English. It suggests that the antinomy of ‘formal’ versus ‘sociological’ approaches, first criticised by Cronin three decades ago, is still present, and mars any attempt by critics to understand, appreciate and assess the diversity of the output of South African poets more fully. This flaw has become more noticeable and more vexed in the contemporary situation of global flows of information and influence, inter alia via the internet. This is exemplified in a brief analysis of two contemporary South African poets, Khulile Nxumalo and Lesego Rampolokeng. Using the formulations in Jahan Ramazani’s recent A transnational poetics as a starting point, the article suggests ways in which the present critical impasse might be addressed.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.