ArticlePDF Available

Laminaria species and usefulness in obstetrics and gynecology

Authors:

Abstract

Laminaria species is a group of marine algae that is generally known as sea brown algae. It can be seen around the world and the coastal people have known it for years. The use of Laminaria spp. in medicine is very interesting. In this short article, the authors summarized and discussed on Laminaria spp. and usefulness in obstetrics and gynecology.
244
Short communication doi: 10.12980/jclm.4.2016j5-193 ©2016 by the Journal of Coastal Life Medicine. All rights reserved.
Laminaria species and usefulness in obstetrics and gynecology
Beuy Joob1*, Viroj Wiwanitkti2,3,4,5
1Sanitation 1 Medical Academic Center, Bangkok, Thailand
2Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China
3Faculty of Medicine, University of Niš, Niš, Serbia
4Joseph Ayobabalola University, Nigeria
5Dr DY Patil Medical University, India
Journal of Coastal Life Medicine 2016; 4(3): 244-245
Journal of Coastal Life Medicine
*Corresponding author: Beuy Joob, Sanitation 1 Medical Academic Center,
Bangkok, Thailand.
Tel: +6624658292
E-mail: beuyjoob@hotmail.com
The journal implements double-blind peer review practiced by specially invited
international editorial board members.
1. Introduction
There are many kinds of marine algae. Several medical advantages
of algae is confirmed[1-11]. Of several species, Laminaria species is
a group of marine algae that is generally known as sea brown algae.
It can be seen around the world and the coastal people have known
it for years. Generally, the algae can be seen at 25 to 100 feet depth
level. This algae has been used as food source for a long time[12].
It is also mentioned as nutraceutical that can be useful against
obesity and diabetes[13]. The use of Laminaria spp. in medicine
is very interesting. In this short article, the authors summarized
and discussed on Laminaria spp. and usefulness in obstetrics and
gynecology.
2.
Laminaria
spp. in obstetrics
Using Laminaria spp. in obstetrics is very interesting[14]. For
a few years, the algae has been used for vaginal preparation[14].
It is indicated for help induce abortion[15-17]. In fact, the vaginal
preparation is a very important medical procedures in obstetrics[18-27].
Herczeg et al. concluded that the dilatatory effect of laminaria was
an obvious help in termination of both first and second trimester
pregnancies[16]. The vaginal dilation effect is considered safe and
produced less side effect comparing to other methods[28-30]. Hence,
the use of this algae should be considered in clinical practice[28].
3.
Laminaria
spp. in gynecology
Using Laminaria spp. in gynecology is very interesting[14]. The
use of the algae in gynecology is just developed (after using it in
obstetrics for a long time). Using of Laminaria spp. in vaginal
preparation for obstetric surgery can be seen at present. Using
for hysteroscopy, Darwish et al. noted that both misoprostol and
laminaria were equally effective in inducing proper cervical priming
prior to operative hysteroscopy with minimal time of cervical
dilatation[31]. Al-Fozan et al. concluded that laminaria may be more
effective than misoprostol, with uncertain effects for complication
rates[32] and also noted that the possible benefits of laminaria
need to be weighed against the inconvenience of its insertion and
retention for one to two days[32].
Apart from vaginal preparation, Laminaria spp. is also applied
for management of colpitis. Shabrin and Shapiro recently reported
success in the treatment of trichomonal colpitis with preparations
of laminaria[33]. The application on management of uterine myoma
ARTICLE INFO ABSTRAC T
Laminaria species is a group of marine algae that is generally known as sea brown algae. It can
be seen around the world and the coastal people have known it for years. The use of Laminaria
spp. in medicine is very interesting. In this short article, the authors summarized and discussed
on Laminaria spp. and usefulness in obstetrics and gynecology.
Article history:
Received 30 Sep 2015
Received in revised form 16 Oct 2015
Accepted 20 Nov 2015
Available online 2 Mar 2016
Keywords:
Laminaria
Obstetrics
Gynecology
journal homepage: www.jclmm.com
Beuy Joob and Viroj Wiwanitkti/Journal of Coastal Life Medicine 2016; 4(3): 244-245 245
and uterine cervix cancer is also reported. For example, Kumar and
Good reported using hygroscopic laminaria tent for gradual cervical
dilatation in place of manual cervical dilatation[34]. Another report
by Goldrath used the algae to help dilate vagina in vaginal removal
of the pedunculated submucous myoma[35].
4. Conclusions
As a marine product, the Laminaria spp. preparation can be
safely used in management of several problems in obstetrics and
gynecology.
Conflict of interest statement
We declare that we have no conflict of interest.
References
[1] Abdul QA, Choi RJ, Jung HA, Choi JS. Health benefit of fucosterol
from marine algae-a review. J Sci Food Agric 2015; doi: 10.1002/
jsfa.7489.
[2] Sharifuddin Y, Chin YX, Lim PE, Phang SM. Potential bioactive
compounds from seaweed for diabetes management. Mar Drugs 2015;
13(8): 5447-91.
[3] Maeda H. Nutraceutical effects of fucoxanthin for obesity and diabetes
therapy: a review. J Oleo Sci 2015; 64(2): 125-32.
[4] Murugan AC, Karim MR, Yusoff MB, Tan SH, Asras MF, Rashid SS.
New insights into seaweed polyphenols on glucose homeostasis. Pharm
Biol 2015; 53(8): 1087-97.
[5] Wang HM, Chen CC, Huynh P, Chang JS. Exploring the potential of
using algae in cosmetics. Bioresour Technol 2015; 184: 355-62.
[6] Madrigal-Santillán E, Madrigal-Bujaidar E, Álvarez-González I,
Sumaya-Martínez MT, Gutiérrez-Salinas J, Bautista M, et al. Review of
natural products with hepatoprotective effects. World J Gastroenterol
2014; 20(40): 14787-804.
[7] Fan X, Bai L, Zhu L, Yang L, Zhang X. Marine algae-derived bioactive
peptides for human nutrition andhealth. J Agric Food Chem 2014;
62(38): 9211-22.
[8] de Jesus Raposo MF, de Morais RM, de Morais AM. Health applications
of bioactive compounds from marine microalgae. Life Sci 2013; 93(15):
479-86.
[9] Silva TH, Alves A, Popa EG, Reys LL, Gomes ME, Sousa RA, et al.
Marine algae sulfated polysaccharides for tissue engineering and drug
delivery approaches. Biomatter 2012; 2(4): 278-89.
[10] Ku CS, Yang Y, Park Y, Lee J. Health benefits of blue-green algae:
prevention of cardiovascular disease and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.
J Med Food 2013; 16(2): 103-11.
[11] Mišurcová L, Škrovánková S, Samek D, Ambrožová J, Machů L. Health
benefits of algal polysaccharides in human nutrition. Adv Food Nutr Res
2012; 66: 75-145.
[12] Vadalà M, Palmieri B. [From algae to “functional foods”]. Clin Ter
2015; 166(4): e281-300. Italian.
[13] Shirosaki M, Koyama T. Laminaria japonica as a food for the prevention
of obesity and diabetes. Adv Food Nutr Res 2011; 64: 199-212.
[14] Abramchenko VV, Gorgidzhanian RS, Novikov EI. [Laminaria in
obstetrical and gynecological practice]. Akush Ginekol (Mosk) 1989;
(10): 12-4. Russian.
[15] Gorgidzhanian RS, Abramchenko VV. [Termination of pregnancy in the
first and second trimester using natural and synthetic laminaria tents].
Sov Med 1989; (1): 44-7. Russian.
[16] Herczeg J, Sas M, Szabó J, Vajda G. Pre-evacuation dilatation of the
pregnant uterine cervix by Laminaria japonica. Acta Med Hung 1986;
43(2): 145-54.
[17] Fuchi I, Noda K. Midtrimester artificial abortion using 16, 16-dimethyl-
trans-delta 2-PGE1 methyl ester (Preglandin), laminaria tents and
continuous epidural anesthesia. Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol 1985;
11(3): 377-85.
[18] Haas DM, Morgan S, Contreras K. Vaginal preparation with antiseptic
solution before cesarean section for preventing postoperative infections.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007892.
pub5.
[19] Haas DM, Morgan S, Contreras K. Vaginal preparation with antiseptic
solution before cesarean section for preventing postoperative infections.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007892.
pub3.
[20] Haas DM, Morgan S, Contreras K. Vaginal preparation with antiseptic
solution before cesarean section for preventing postoperative infections.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007892.
pub4.
[21] Gilstrop M, Sciscione A. Induction of labor-pharmacology methods.
Semin Perinatol 2015; 39(6): 463-5.
[22] Amorosa JM, Stone JL. Outpatient cervical ripening. Semin Perinatol
2015; 39(6): 488-94.
[23] Ezebialu IU, Eke AC, Eleje GU, Nwachukwu CE. Methods for assessing
pre-induction cervical ripening. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; doi:
10.1002/14651858.CD010762.pub2.
[24] Madan A, Tracy S, Reid R, Henry A. Recruitment difficulties in obstetric
trials: a case study and review. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2014; 54(6):
546-52.
[25] Goetzl L. Methods of cervical ripening and labor induction:
pharmacologic. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2014; 57(2): 377-90.
[26] Głuszak M, Fracki S, Wielgoś M, Wegrzyn P. [Methods of evaluating
labor progress in contemporary obstetrics]. Ginekol Pol 2013; 84(8):
709-13. Polish.
[27] Swamy GK. Current methods of labor induction. Semin Perinatol 2012;
36(5): 348-52.
[28] Jonasson A. [Laminaria--a modern cervix dilatation method with more
than a 100-year history]. Jordemodern 1984; 97(6): 187-95. Swedish.
[29] Stornes I, Rasmussen KL. A comparison of lamicel tents and gemeprost
(cervagem) pessaries prior to first trimester abortion. Arch Gynecol
Obstet 1991; 249(2): 67-72.
[30] Helm CW, Davies N, Beard RJ. A comparison of gemeprost (cervagem)
pessaries and lamicel tents for cervical preparation for abortion by
dilatation and suction. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1988; 95(9): 911-5.
[31] Darwish AM, Ahmad AM, Mohammad AM. Cervical priming prior to
operative hysteroscopy: a randomized comparison of laminaria versus
misoprostol. Hum Reprod 2004; 19(10): 2391-4.
[32] Al-Fozan H, Firwana B, Al Kadri H, Hassan S, Tulandi T. Preoperative
ripening of the cervix before operative hysteroscopy. Cochrane Database
Syst Rev 2015; doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005998.pub2.
[33] Shabrin MG, Shapiro SN. [Treatment of trichomonal colpitis with
preparations of Laminaria]. Akush Ginekol (Mosk) 1954; 2: 81-3.
Russian.
[34] Kumar PP, Good RR. Accurate and economical intracavitary
endocurietherapy in the treatment of uterine cervix cancer. Strahlenther
Onkol 1986; 162(1): 8-12.
[35] Goldrath MH. Vaginal removal of the pedunculated submucous myoma:
the use of laminaria. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 70(4): 670-2.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Diabetes mellitus is a group of metabolic disorders of the endocrine system characterised by hyperglycaemia. Type II diabetes mellitus (T2DM) constitutes the majority of diabetes cases around the world and are due to unhealthy diet, sedentary lifestyle, as well as rise of obesity in the population, which warrants the search for new preventive and treatment strategies. Improved comprehension of T2DM pathophysiology provided various new agents and approaches against T2DM including via nutritional and lifestyle interventions. Seaweeds are rich in dietary fibres, unsaturated fatty acids, and polyphenolic compounds. Many of these seaweed compositions have been reported to be beneficial to human health including in managing diabetes. In this review, we discussed the diversity of seaweed composition and bioactive compounds which are potentially useful in preventing or managing T2DM by targeting various pharmacologically relevant routes including inhibition of enzymes such as α-glucosidase, α-amylase, lipase, aldose reductase, protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP1B) and dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 (DPP-4). Other mechanisms of action identified, such as anti-inflammatory, induction of hepatic antioxidant enzymes' activities, stimulation of glucose transport and incretin hormones release, as well as β-cell cytoprotection, were also discussed by taking into consideration numerous in vitro, in vivo, and human studies involving seaweed and seaweed-derived agents.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Induction of labour is the artificial initiation of labour in a pregnant woman after the age of fetal viability but without any objective evidence of active phase labour and with intact fetal membranes. The need for induction of labour may arise due to a problem in the mother, her fetus or both, and the procedure may be carried out at or before term. Obstetricians have long known that for this to be successful, it is important that the uterine cervix (the neck of the womb) has favourable characteristics in terms of readiness to go into the labour state. Objectives: To compare Bishop score with any other method for assessing pre-induction cervical ripening in women admitted for induction of labour. Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (31 March 2015) and reference lists of retrieved studies to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Selection criteria: All RCTs comparing Bishop score with any other methods of pre-induction cervical assessment in women admitted for induction of labour. Cluster-RCTs were eligible for inclusion but none were identified. Quasi-RCTs and studies using a cross-over design were not eligible for inclusion. Studies published in abstract form were eligible for inclusion if they provided sufficient information.Comparisons could include the following.1. Bishop score versus transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS).2. Bishop score versus Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1).3. Bishop score versus vaginal fetal fibronectin (fFN).However, we only identified data for a comparison of Bishop score versus TVUS. Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently assessed the trials for inclusion, extracted the data and assessed trial quality. Data were checked for accuracy. Main results: We included two trials that recruited a total of 234 women. The overall risk of bias was low for the two studies. Both studies compared Bishop score withTVUS.The two included studies did not show any clear difference between the Bishop score and TVUS groups for the following main outcomes: vaginal birth (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.25, moderate quality evidence), caesarean delivery (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.34, moderate quality evidence), neonatal admission into neonatal intensive care unit (RR 1.67, 95% CI 0.41 to 6.71, moderate quality evidence). Both studies only provided median data in relation to induction-delivery interval and reported no clear difference between the Bishop and TVUS groups. Perinatal mortality was not reported in the included studies.For the review's secondary outcomes, the need for misoprostol for cervical ripening was more frequent in the TVUS group compared to the Bishop score group (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.66, two studies, 234 women, moderate quality evidence). In contrast, there were no clear differences between the Bishop scope and TVUS groups in terms of meconium staining of the amniotic fluid, fetal heart rate abnormality in labour, and Apgar score less than seven. Only one trial reported median data on the induction-delivery interval and induction to active phase interval, the trialist reported no difference between the Bishop group and the TVUS group for this outcome. Neither of the included studies reported on uterine rupture. Authors' conclusions: Moderate quality evidence from two small RCTs involving 234 women that compared two different methods for assessing pre-induction cervical ripening (Bishop score and TVUS) did not demonstrate superiority of one method over the other in terms of the main outcomes assessed in this review. We did not identify any data relating to perinatal mortality. Whilst use of TVUS was associated with an increased need for misoprostol for cervical ripening, both methods could be complementary.The choice of a particular method of assessing pre-induction cervical ripening may differ depending on the environment and need where one is practicing since some methods (i.e. TVUS) may not be readily available and affordable in resource-poor settings where the sequelae of labour and its management is prevalent.The evidence in this review is based on two studies that enrolled a small number of women and there is insufficient evidence to support the use of TVUS over the standard digital vaginal assessment in pre-induction cervical ripening. Further adequately powered RCTs involving TVUS and the Bishop score and including other methods of pre-induction cervical ripening assessment are warranted. Such studies need to address uterine rupture, perinatal mortality, optimal cut-off value of the cervical length and Bishop score to classify women as having favourable or unfavourable cervices and cost should be included as an outcome.
Article
Full-text available
Obesity, which results from an imbalance between energy intake and energy expenditure, has become a major health risk factor worldwide, causing numerous and various diseases such as diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular diseases. Fucoxanthin, a specific carotenoid in brown algae, has garnered much attention for its anti-obesity and anti-diabetic effects attributable to a unique mechanism. Fucoxanthin induces uncoupling protein 1 (UCP1) expression in white adipose tissue (WAT). That inner membrane mitochondrial protein, UCP1, can dissipate energy through oxidation of fatty acids and heat production. Furthermore, fucoxanthin improves insulin resistance and ameliorates blood glucose levels through down-regulation of adipocytokines related to insulin resistance in WAT and up-regulation of glucose transporter 4 (GLUT4) in skeletal muscle. Algae fucoxanthin is a beneficial compound for the prevention of the metabolic syndrome.
Article
Full-text available
Background The CONSORT statement calls for complete data on flow of participants, including all losses and exclusions. Incomplete reporting of flow into trials versus flow through trials is not uncommon. Where complete data exist in obstetric trials, poor recruitment seems a recurring theme.AimsTo explore difficulties in recruitment and differences between assessed-but-not-recruited and included women to improve future trial participation, using a case study of a recently published randomised trial of outpatient Foley catheter versus inpatient PGE2 gel for cervical ripening.Materials & Methods The assessed-but-not-recruited population of an obstetric trial (ACTRN:12609000420246) was prospectively studied for reasons for noninclusion, demographic data and pregnancy outcome. Women assessed-but-not-recruited due to declined consent or obstetrician declined participation were compared to included women. Main outcome measures included demographic and outcome differences associated with trial participation.ResultsOf 468 assessed participants, 220 (47%) were not eligible by exclusion criteria (potential ‘trial factor’ recruitment difficulties), 147 (31%) declined consent (n = 100, ‘participant factor’) or their obstetrician declined participation (n = 47, ‘clinician factor’) and 101 (22%) were included. Declining women were more likely than participants to be parous (24 vs 10%, P < 0.05), induced for nonmedical reasons (18 vs 4%, P < 0.001), privately admitted (31 vs 3%, P < 0.001) and have longer inpatient stay (4.9 vs 4.2 days, P < 0.05).Conclusion The high assessed-but-not-recruited rate highlights important issues with external validity and feasibility when conducting obstetric trials, including recruitment difficulties related to participant, clinician and trial factors. Assessed: recruited ratios and demographic and outcome differences need consideration in planning and interpretation of randomised trials.
Article
Background: Seaweeds belong to a group of marine plants known as algae which consumed as sea vegetables in several Asian countries. Recent studies have focused on the biological and pharmacological activities of seaweeds and its highly bioactive secondary metabolites due to its possibility in the development of new pharmaceutical agents. Although several varieties of bioactive novel compounds such as phlorotannins, diterpenes, and polysaccharides from seaweeds have been already well scrutinized, fucosterol as phytosterols still need to reinvent itself. Results: Fucosterol (24-ethylidene cholesterol) is a sterol that can be isolated from algae, seaweed, and diatoms. Fucosterol exhibits various biological therapeutics, including anti-cancer, anti-diabetic, anti-oxidant, hepatoprotective, anti-hyperlipidemic, anti-fungal, anti-histaminic, anti-cholinergic, anti-adipogenic, anti-photodamaging, anti-osteoporotic, blood cholesterol reducing, blood vessel thrombosis preventive, and butyrylcholinesterase inhibitory activities. Conclusion: In this review, we address some potential approaches for arbitrating novel fucosterol biologics in the medical field, focusing on the selection of personalized drug candidates and highlighting the challenges and opportunities regarding medical breakthroughs. We also highlight the recent advances made in the design of this novel compound, as the significant health benefits from using these optimized applications apply to the nutraceutical and pharmaceutical fields.
Article
Pharmacologic methods for induction of labor have been used for many decades. Pharmacologic agents have an advantage over mechanical methods in that they can be used during both the initial cervical ripening stage of induction and throughout the second stage of labor. Pharmacologic induction agents such as prostaglandins and oxytocin are commonly used for labor and delivery floors and are well established for use in cervical ripening. Nitric oxide donors and mifepristone are known agents in medicine but are new and actively studied in the area of cervical ripening. These agents are introduced and analyzed in this review.
Article
Induction of labor is one of the most commonly performed obstetric procedures. Many patients undergoing labor induction require cervical ripening. In an era where cost and patient satisfaction have become paramount, the idea of outpatient cervical ripening is appealing; provided it can be performed in a safe and cost effective manner. The ideal agent would induce adequate cervical ripening without causing significant uterine contractions/labor. Various methods have been studied including administration of misoprostol, PGE2, nitric oxide donors, use of Foley balloon catheters and acupuncture. Each method has its strengths and limitations; however, larger studies of outpatient cervical ripening that are specifically powered for rare adverse maternal and fetal outcomes are needed before definitive recommendations can be made.
Article
Background: Hysteroscopy is an operation in which the gynaecologist examines the uterine cavity using a small telescopic instrument (hysteroscope) inserted via the vagina and the cervix. Almost 50% of hysteroscopic complications are related to difficulty with cervical entry. Potential complications include cervical tears, creation of a false passage, perforation, bleeding, or simply difficulty in entering the internal os (between the cervix and the uterus) with the hysteroscope. These complications may possibly be reduced with adequate preparation of the cervix (cervical ripening) prior to hysteroscopy. Cervical ripening agents include oral or vaginal prostaglandin, which can be synthetic (e.g misoprostol) or natural (e.g. dinoprostone) and vaginal osmotic dilators, which can be naturally occurring (e.g. laminaria) or synthetic. Objectives: To determine whether preoperative cervical preparation facilitates cervical dilatation and reduces the complications of operative hysteroscopy in women undergoing the procedure for any condition. Search methods: In August 2014 we searched sources including the Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group (MDSG) Trials Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov and reference lists of relevant articles. We searched for published and unpublished studies in any language. Selection criteria: Two review authors independently selected randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of cervical ripening agents used before operative hysteroscopy in pre- and postmenopausal women. Cervical ripening agents could be compared to each other, placebo or no treatment. Data collection and analysis: Data extraction and quality assessment were conducted independently by two review authors. The primary review outcomes were effectiveness of cervical dilatation (defined as the proportion of women requiring mechanical cervical dilatation) and intraoperative complications. Secondary outcomes were mean time required to dilate the cervix, preoperative pain, cervical width, abandonment of the procedure, side effects of dilating agents and duration of surgery. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences (MDs) for continuous outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals ( CIs). Data were statistically pooled where appropriate. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I(2) statistic. The overall quality of the evidence was assessed using GRADE methods. Main results: Nineteen RCTs with a total of 1870 participants were included. They compared misoprostol with no treatment or placebo, dinoprostone or osmotic dilators.Misoprostol was more effective for cervical dilatation than placebo or no intervention, with fewer women requiring mechanical dilatation (OR 0.08, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.16, five RCTs, 441 participants, I(2)=0%, moderate quality evidence). This suggests that in a population in which 80% of women undergoing hysteroscopy require mechanical dilatation without use of preoperative ripening agents, use of misoprostol will reduce the need for mechanical dilatation to between 14% and 39%. Misoprostol was associated with fewer intraoperative complications (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.77, 12 RCTs, 901 participants, I(2)=0%, moderate quality evidence). This suggests that in a population in which 3% of women undergoing hysteroscopy experience intraoperative complications without use of preoperative ripening agents, use of misoprostol will reduce the risk of complications to 2% or less.When specific complications were considered, the misoprostol group had a lower rate of cervical laceration or tearing (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.57, nine RCTS, 669 women, I(2)=0%, moderate quality evidence) or false track formation (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.97, seven RCTs, 560 participants, I(2)=0%, moderate quality evidence). There was no evidence of a difference between the groups in rates of uterine perforation (0.42, 95% CI 0.13 to 1.38, seven RCTs, 455 participants, I(2)=0%, low quality evidence) or uterine bleeding (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.10 to 2.49, four RCTs, 340 participants, I(2)=0%, low quality evidence). Some treatment side effects (mild abdominal pain, vaginal bleeding, and increased body temperature) were more common in the misoprostol group.Compared with dinoprostone, misoprostol was associated with more effective cervical dilatation, with fewer women requiring mechanical dilatation (OR 0.58; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.98; one RCT, 310 participants, low quality evidence) and with fewer intraoperative complications (OR 0.32; 95% CI 0.12 to 0.83, one RCT, 310 participants, low quality evidence). However treatment side effects were more common in the misoprostol arm.Compared to osmotic dilatation (laminaria), misoprostol was associated with less effective cervical dilatation, with more women in the misoprostol group requiring mechanical dilatation (OR 5.96, 95% CI 2.61 to 13.59, one RCT, 110 participants, low quality evidence). There was no evidence of a difference between misoprostol and osmotic dilators in intraoperative complication rates (OR 5.14, 95% CI 0.24 to 109.01, three RCTs, 354 participants, low quality evidence), with only two events reported altogether.The overall quality of the evidence ranged from low to moderate. The main limitations in the evidence were imprecision and poor reporting of study methods. Authors' conclusions: There is moderate quality evidence that use of misoprostol for preoperative ripening of the cervix before operative hysteroscopy is more effective than placebo or no treatment and is associated with fewer intraoperative complications such as lacerations and false tracks. However misoprostol is associated with more side effects, including preoperative pain and vaginal bleeding. There is low quality evidence to suggest that misoprostol has fewer intraoperative complications and is more effective than dinoprostone.There is also low quality evidence to suggest that laminaria may be more effective than misoprostol, with uncertain effects for complication rates. However the possible benefits of laminaria need to be weighed against the inconvenience of its insertion and retention for one to two days.