ChapterPDF Available

Japanese, giant and Bohemian knotweed (Fallopia japonica, Fallopia sachalinensis and Fallopia ×bohemica)

  • Savaria Museum, Hungary, Szombathely

Abstract and Figures

Japanese, giant and Bohemian knotweed (Fallopia japonica (Houtt.) Ronse Decr., Fallopia sachalinensis (Frdr. Schmidt) Ronse Decr. and Fallopia ×bohemica (Chrtek et Chrtková) J. P. Bailey) — Taxonomy, Morphology, Origin and distribution, Life cycle, Habitat preference (autecology, phytosociology), Biotic interactions (allelopathy, competition, herbivores, pathogens, symbiosis), Economic importance (benefits, damages), Nature conservation significance, Bibliography
Content may be subject to copyright.
(Fallopia japonica (H.) R D.,
F. sachalinensis (F. S) R D.
and F. ×bohemica (C et C) J. P. B)
L B
Department of Natural History, Savaria Museum,
Pf. 14, Szombathely, H-9701, Hungary;
Tax onomy
A) Scientific name: Fallopia japonica (H) L.P. R D in R D  A-
 1988; synonyms: Reynoutria japonica H 1777; Polygonum cuspidatum S et Z-
 1844; P. sieboldii D V 1849, non M. in DC. 1856; P. sieboldii hort. ex M
(sensu C & F 1994); P. giganteum hort.; P. confertum H fil.; P. r e y n o u tr i a M-
 1901; P. zuccarinii S 1895; Pleuropterus zuccarinii (S) S 1933; Pl. cuspidatus (S.
et Z.) H. G 1913; Tiniaria japonica (H.) H 1946; Common names: UK: Japanese
knotweed, Sally rhubarb, donkey rhubarb, gypsy rhubarb, Hancock’s curse, broad-leaved polygonum;
USA: Mexican bamboo, Japanese bamboo, Japanese fleece-flower, wild rhubarb, crimson beauty, ele-
phant-ear bamboo.
B) Scientific name: Fallopia sachalinensis (F. S P.) L.P. R D in R
D  A 1988; synonyms: Reynoutria sachalinensis (F. S P.) N in
T. M 1922; Polygonum sachalinense F. S P. e x M 1859; Pleuropterus sa-
chalinensis (F. S P.) H. G 1913; Tiniaria sachalinensis (F. S P.)
J 1950; Reynoutria sachalinensis va r. brachyphylla H; R. brachyphylla (H) N 1938;
R. ×vivax S & S 1985 (sensu C & F 1994, et K 1999); Common
names: UK: giant knotweed; USA: Sakhalian knotweed, elephant-ear bamboo, Sacaline, Sakhaline.
C) Scientific name: Fallopia ×bohemica (C  C) J.P. B 1989; synonyms: Reynou-
tria ×bohemica J. C  A. C1983; R. ×vivax J. S  K.J. S 1985; R. ×vivax
auct., non S  S 1985 (sensu C & F 1994); Polygonum ×bohemicum (J.
C  A. C) P.F. Z  A.L. J ; (= F. japonica × F. sachalinensis); Common
names: Bohemian knotweed; hybrid knotweed.
e family of knotweeds (Polygonaceae) belonging to the order of Polygonales comprises about 40 gen-
era. e taxonomy and nomenclature of species dealt with in the present study have changed many times.
Taxa that were earlier classified into the genera Reynoutria, Polygonum, Tiniaria, Pleuropterus and partly
also Bilderdykia – are recently specified, based on chromo some analyses, as belonging to the genus Fallopia
e most important invasive plants in Hungary, pp. 13-33
edited by Zoltán Botta-Dukát and Lajos Balogh
© 2008, Institute of Ecology and Botany, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Vácrátót, Hungary
14 L. B
A., divided into four sections2. e section Fallopia contains annual plants with climbing stems, such
as copse bindweed (F. dumetorum /L./ J. H) and black bindweed (F. c on v ol v u l us /L./ A. L). e
section Parogonum K . H includes perennial creeping plants, with no representative occurring
in Hungary. Perennial or ligneous plants are categorized in the Sarmentosae (I. G.) H. section,
such as Russian vine (F. baldschuanica /R/ J. H) and silver lace vine (F. a ub e r t ii /L. H/ J.
H).3e Reynoutria (H.) L. P. R D section contains Japanese knotweed (F. j a p on i -
ca), giant knotweed (F. sachalinensis), and their hybrid the Bohemian or hybrid knotweed (F. ×bohemica).
Due to their synanthropic expansion, invasive and strong habitat-transforming nature, Japanese, giant and
hybrid knotweeds have been in the focus of intensifying scientific and nature conservation scrutiny in the
past 20-25 years. Because the three species are highly similar and because their distribution data are thus
significantly overlapping and unclarified, it seems reasonable to deal with them together. e reason the
authors introduce the three taxa sometimes at different depths is the limitations caused by different levels
of international research into these taxa.
e three species discussed are robust, herbaceous perennial (geophyte) plants usually taller than a man.
ey have roots penetrating 1-2 m deep down from their base, and far-reaching, laterally spreading rhi-
zomes, bearing buds on them. In the categorization system developed for clonal plants by K et al.
(1997), they belong to the “Aegopodium podagraria”-type. With their dense shoot system budding from
the rhizome, they create connected offshoot colonies (polycormons) which are easily recognized even in
the defoliated stage from the pectinated pattern of erect stems, coloured in dun when dried. eir stems
are upright and thick, hollow at the lower section, and leafless at the bottom. eir leaves are large, broad
or elongated ovate, more or less cuspidate at the apex, with entire margin. Leaf shape and size vary at dif-
ferent life stages and at different locations on the plant. e largest are the ones on the stem, their dispo-
sition being sparse. Ones located on the lateral ramifications are considerably smaller, placed oppositely.
eir flowers are arranged in small glomerules, in multi-axial partial inflorescences with bracts, togeth-
er making up axillary, short-axled complex panicles (pleiothyrsus). In addition to the openly positioned
main inflorescence atop the stem, there are also accessory inflorescences on the leafy paracladia. Func-
tionally, these species are dioecious (sometimes polygamous, with mixed – unisexual and hermaphrodite
– flowers), meaning that there is sexual dimorphism in flower composition and inflorescence structure.
Staminate flowers are 9 mm long, whereas pistillate ones are only 5–6 mm, but the perianth can grow
further on when the fruit is ripened. e five tepals are united at their base, forming a tubelet. e outer
ones have three keels or are winged. e number of stamens is 8, and the stigmae on the 3 free-standing
styles are fimbriated. On functionally male specimens the pistils are reduced, whereas on female plants
stamens are vestigial. F. ×bohemica is an exception, because in this species hermaphrodite flowers (with
fully developed stamens and pistils) can grow on male specimens. No fruit is produced, though, in this
case. However, even fruit can be produced on the staminate (male) specimens of F. sachalinensis, be cause
in this species pistils are only partially reduced. Apart from these exceptions, the enwrapped, three-edged
or three-winged achenes are produced on female (pistil-bearing) flowers only, the fruits measuring about
10 mm. In case of F. japonica, the achene is 2–4 mm long, weighing 1.6 g per 1000 seeds. ese species
bear nectaria as well. eir floral nectaria are of the epithelium-type, whereas extrafloral nectaria located
on the external surface of cicatrices belong to the trichoma and pit types. Further exomorphological fea-
tures used for differentiation between the three species are listed in Table 1. From that it is apparent that
the hybrid F. ×bohemica is located between the parent species (F. japonica and F. sachalinensis) not only
1 B et al. (1995) believe that the Reynoutria sectio of Fallopia genus includes F. japonica together with its varieties, F. ×bo-
hemica and F. sachalinensis, but the category “Japanese knotweeds” describes only F. japonica v ar. japonica and F. ×bohemica.
Later for convenience F. japonica, F. sachalinensis, F. ×bohemica and any backcrosses were referred to collectively as Japanese
knotweed s.l. (cf. B W 2006).
2 is classification was not taken over by Flora Europaea and by the majority of Central-European literature. Instead, these
knotweed species are still dealt with in the genus Reynoutria.
3 e taxonomy (and thus adventive distribution relations) of the two species are not viewed uniformly in international literature.
15Fallopia japonica, F. sachalinensis and F. ×bohemica
in respect of its chromosome number but also in certain morphological features. Phenotypic variability
is mostly characteristic for the highly polymorphic F. japonica, especially in its native range where it re-
mains shorter. However, it is typical of all three species and in all of their habitats that under arid circum-
stances the plants will have shorter stem and smaller leaves. F. sachalinensis is the most similar in size, and
can be clearly confinable species both in its native and adventive range. For quite a long time, infraspecific
taxa have not been described apart form F. japonica, and more recently in F. sachalinensis, from their na-
tive distribution area.4 Besides F. japonica va r. japonica × F. sachalinensis = F. ×bohemica other hybrids are
also known which are considered to be partly intrasectional (belonging to Reynoutria section)5 and part-
ly intersectional taxa (belonging to Reynoutria and Sarmentosae sections)6. e basic chromosome num-
ber typical in species belonging to Reynoutria section is n = 11. e characteristic chromosome number
(2n) of each species are shown on Table 1, but some literature records report different cytotypes (incl.
aneuploids) too, e.g.: F. japonica va r. japonica (2n = 44, ~60**, 66*, 110*),7 F. sachalinensis (2n = 66**, 88**,
102*, 103*, 132*), F. ×bohemica (2n = 88**). e molecular genetic analyses performed in the United King-
dom and in the Czech Republic shows that the order of genotypic variability of these species is the fol-
lowing: F. japonica va r. japonica < F. j . var. compacta < F. sachalinensis < F. ×bohemica, i.e. the hybrid is ge-
netically the most diverse taxon in the study areas (H et al. 1998, M et al. 2005). In
attempts to genetically characterize knotweed species in Britain by molecular markers, including RAPDs
and ISSRs, and to evaluate genotypic diversity in invasive Fallopia germplasm (H  B-
 2000), a single genotype of F. japonica was detected, suggesting all individuals were ramets of a sin-
gle, but exceptionally widespread clone. e octoploid female (male-sterile) individuals of F. japonica v ar.
japonica investigated by Czech authors proved to be genetically uniform and belongs to the same geno-
type that is present probably in the whole Europe (M et al. 2005). On the other hand, the results of
recent investigations carried out in the USA suggests the presence of intercrossing, segregating hybrids,
and likely introgression between F1 hybrids and F. japonica. is study also shows therst evidence of
bidirectional hybridization between parental taxa in the USA, emphasizing the complex structure of
populations in that region (G et al. 2007). Hybridization and backcrossing within the species of
4 Fallopia japonica var. compacta (H. f.) J. P. B 1989 (syn.: Polygonum cuspidatum var. compactum /J. D. H./ L.
H. B; P. cuspidatum va r. compactum hort.; Reynoutria japonica v ar. compacta /H. f./ M 1941, ead. comb.
B 1972; Polygonum compactum H fil.; P. sieboldii va r. nanum hort.; P. cuspidatum ’Reynoutria /sensu N
1978/) is an alpine variety, being smaller and more compact than var. japonica; it is (30–) 50–60 (–100) cm tall, its stem being
less upright; its lateral stems are dark red or reddish maroon; leaves are small (4–7cm), almost round (characteristically as long
as broad), with thick and leathery blade, strongly truncated base, undulate margin, and abruptly cuspidate apex; the flowers in
the compact (–6 cm), non-branching or slightly branching upright panicles are white, carmine or reddish. It is an alpine dwarf
variant native to volcanic ash and scree habitats of Central and North-Japan. One of its forms – f. coloransis a typical pioneer
plant growing in cushions of several meters wide in the 300-500 m surroundings of active volcano craters. In its synanthropic
range, it has been found growing wild very rarely, only in the British Isles and Czech Republic so far. It is usually grown in
botanical gardens, and only rarely as an ornamental. 2n = 44.
Fallopia japonica var. uzenensis (H) K. Y  H O 1997 (syn.: Reynoutria japonica v ar. uzenensis
H) is a variety with hairy leaf underside native to snowy areas of Japan, on the side of the Japanese Sea. It is also a rare
garden plant in Japan and America. 2n = 88.
Fallopia japonica var. hachidyoensis (M) K. Y  H O 1997 (syn.: Polygonum hachidyoense
M; P. cuspidatum var. terminale (H) O; Reynoutria japonica var. terminalis H, R. hachidyoensis v ar. ter-
minalis H) is an isolated endemism native to the Izu Isles located near Honshu, bearing larger leaves with waxy shine. It
grows on windy, bare volcanic ashy terrain or lava fields in open tall herb communities. 2n = 44.
Reynoutria japonica var. spectabilis M (syn.: Polygonum cuspidatum v ar. spectabile D N.) grows somewhat smaller
than var. japonica (–1 m). It is also more sensitive, bearing leaves with white variegation or ruddy, marbly shade. In Japan it is
a rare garden plant too. (No synonymous combination shied to Fallopia is known to exist.)
Reynoutria japonica var. variegata M is a rare garden plant in Japan; it has leaves with white and red striping. (No syn-
onymous combination shied to Fallopia is known to exist.)
Fallopia sachalinensis var. intermedia (T.) K. Y  H O 1997 (syn.: Polygonum sachalinense var.
intermedium T.).
5 E.g. F. japonica va r. japonica × F. j . va r. compacta, intraspecific hybrid, found in the UK and Germany, 2n = 66; F. japonica × F.
×bohemica (6×), backcross, found in Wales, 2n = 76-110; F. ×bohemica (8×) × F. sachalinensis, backcross, found in Wales, 2n
= 66 (cf. B 2003).
6 E.g. Fallopia conollyana J. P. B 2001 (F. japonica × F. baldschuanica) (cf. B  C , B 1992, 2001).
2n = 54.
7 Numbers with a single asterisk refer only to the species’ native distribution area; numbers with two asterisk refer only to the
species’ adventive distribution area.
16 L. B
Fallopia sectio Reynoutria in its adventive range, is clearly a significant and important phenomenon, of-
fering as it does, the possibility of the production of individuals better suited to these non-native regions
(B 2003). is case also render the suggestion by E  S (), hybridiza-
tion may act as a stimulus to invasiveness.
T  Features of the three member of the species group
Japanese knotweed
(Fallopia japonica
var. japonica)
Bohemian or
hybrid knotweed
(Fallopia ×bohemica)
Sakhalian or
giant knotweed
(Fallopia sachalinensis)
Height (1.0–) 1.5–2.0 (–3.0) m;
in its native range around
1.5 m (2.0–) 2.5–3.5 (–4.5) m (2.0–) 2.5–3.5 (–4.5) m
Shape of leafs on
middle of stem broadly-ovate, triangular broadly-ovate elongated-ovate
Shape of leaf base truncate or cuneate upper leaves: mostly trun-
cate or cuneate; lower leaves:
slightly cordate
upper leaves slightly cordate,
lower ones definitely cordate
Leaf tip cuspidate, oen curved acuminate, oen curved acuminate or obtuse,
not curved
Leaf size length 5–15 (–18) cm
width 4–10 (–13) cm length 10–23 (–30) cm
width 9–20 (–22) cm length 15–35 (–43) cm
width 10–20 (–27) cm
Leaf texture leathery–stiff intermediate so
Hairiness of leaf
underside appears glabrous,
but with a hand lens, unicel-
lular papillae are slightly vis-
ible sitting on primary veins,
on a swollen base; intervenal
spaces are glabrous
if the underside is bent and
held towards the light, a
hand lens reveals 0,5 mm
long, 1-4-cell stout hairs
(trichomes) sitting on a swol-
len base, mostly on veins;
intervenal spaces are almost
the 1 mm long, 4-12-cell flex-
ous hairs (trichomes) sitting
on a non-swollen base, scat-
tered mostly on the veins but
also in intervenal spaces, are
visible to even the naked eye
Position of pistillate
the lateral axles of individual
panicles lack further rami-
fications, and are arranged
loosely, sticking out straight
in all directions
the lateral axles of individual
panicles lack further ramifica-
tions, and are arranged more
densely, sticking out straight,
slightly bent or sometimes
arching downwards
the lateral axles of individual
panicles lack further rami-
fications, and are arranged
more densely, uniformly pen-
Position of
the lateral axles of individu-
al panicles may have further
ramifications, and are ar-
ranged loosely and more or
less pointing upwards
the lateral axles of individu-
al panicles may have further
ramifications, and are ar-
ranged densely, forming an
acute angle with the axis of
the main inflorescence, and
pointing up towards the light
in bundles
the lateral axles of individu-
al panicles may have further
ramifications, and are ar-
ranged densely and mostly
Flower biology,
sexual expression
only pistillate (female) speci-
mens are fertile (fruit may be
produced); male specimens
(bearing staminate flowers)
are sterile (no fruit is pro-
only pistillate (female) speci-
mens are fertile (fruit may be
produced); male specimens
(bearing either staminate or
hermaphrodite flowers) are
sterile (no fruit is produced)
both pistillate (female) and
staminate (male) specimens
may be fertile (fruit may be
produced in both cases)
Number of flowers
in one cluster 2–4 3–5 (–6) 4–7
Position of anthers
in male flowers not exserted from the peri-
anth considerably exserted from
the perianths somewhat exserted from the
17Fallopia japonica, F. sachalinensis and F. ×bohemica
Japanese knotweed
(Fallopia japonica
var. japonica)
Bohemian or
hybrid knotweed
(Fallopia ×bohemica)
Sakhalian or
giant knotweed
(Fallopia sachalinensis)
Flowering period July – September July – October July – September
Shape of fruiting
perianth (achene
enclosed in the
persistent perianth)
obcordate, broadly winged
and abruptly narrowed into
the pedicel
elongated-obcordate, broadly
winged and first abruptly,
then run almost parallel
into the pedicel
elongated, narrowly winged
and gradually narrowed into
the pedicel
Width of fruit
(including wings) 3–6 mm 2–4 mm 1.5–3.5 mm
Colour of achene black, shiny bronze, shiny dark purple, shiny
Grown in Hungary ornamental ornamental botanical garden plant
Degree of naturali-
sation in Hungary naturalized, invasive naturalized, invasive, trans-
former casual
Most typical
in Hungary
survives firstly in areas it was
formerly grown, mostly in
ruderal synanthropic envi-
ronments, or less frequent-
ly in degraded near-natural
found firstly in degraded
near-natural habitats (pre-
dominantly along rivers and
streams, and in floodlands),
and secondly in ruderal
synanthropic environments
practically absent from ar-
eas outside the places it was
in Hungary country-wide, but sporadic found country-wide, being
most common in hilly re-
practically in botanical gar-
dens only
2n = 88 (F. j. var. japonica)
[2n = 44 (F. j. var. compacta)]
2n = 66 (F. j. var. japonica /2n
= 88/ × F. s. /2n = 44/)
2n = 44 (F. j. var. compacta
/2n = 44/ × F. s. /2n = 44/)
2n = 44
Identification key for species of the Reynoutria sectio of the genus Fallopia, growing in Hungary
1. a. Leaf blades are stiff leathery, only seldom longer than 15 cm (not longer than 18 cm and not
broader than 13 cm), broadly-ovate, cuspidate at the apex, truncate or cuneate at the base , making leaf
shape appear to be triangular, most strikingly on the lower and middle section of stem. Leaves are near-
ly glabrous, apart from unicellular papillae on primary veins of leaf underside, visible only with a hand
lens. e number of flowers in one cluster is 2–4. Anthers do not exsert from the perianth. e plant
seldom grows taller than 2 m. It is native to Japan, South Sakhalin, Korea, Central Eastern China and
Taiwan; in Hungary it was originally planted as an ornamental and then naturalized. It occurs mostly in
areas it was originally grown, primarily in synanthropic ruderal environments or degraded near-natu-
ral habitats, sporadically country-wide. (Data collected so far usually regards F. ×bohemica.) It is found
in roadside weed communities and ruderal margin vegetation of shaded moist habitats. It is flowering
from July to September.
Fallopia japonica (H.) R D. Japanese knotweed
b. Leaf blades are soer, their length oen exceeding 15 cm (can be longer than 18 cm and broader
than 13 cm); at least the ones on the lower and middle sections of the stem have cordate leaf base; they
are more or less hairy on the underside. e anthers exsert from the perianth. 2–4.5 m tall, more ro-
bust plant
2. a. Leaf blades have so texture, their length can be greater than 30 cm (–43 cm), width can ex-
ceed 22 cm (–27 cm); they are elongated-ovate, acuminate or obtuse, with cordate base. e underside
is hairy – especially on the veins but also in intervenal sections –, well visible to even the naked eye.
Trichomes are 4–12-cellular, approximately 1 mm long. e number of flowers in one cluster is 4–7.
18 L. B
Anthers slightly exsert from the perianth. It is native to South Sakhalin, North and Central Japan; in
Hungary it is almost restricted to botanical gardens (e.g. Vácrátót). (Reports from its growing wild are
mostly about F. ×bohemica.) It is flowering from July to September.
Fallopia sachalinensis (S.) R D. Giant or Sakhalian knotweed
b. is plant is characterized with transitional features of the parent species. e leaves have inter-
mediate texture, they are not longer than 30 cm and not broader than 22 cm, broadly-ovate, acumi-
nate. e base of the upper ones is truncate or cuneate, and the lower ones most strikingly on the
lower and middle sections of the stem – are slightly cordate. Leaf underside appears to be glabrous to
the naked eye, but, if examined with a hand lens, it has short, sparse hairs mostly on the veins, while
the intervenal spaces are almost hairless. Trichomes are 1–4-cellular, approximately 0.5 mm long. e
number of flowers in one cluster is 3–5(–6). Anthers exsert considerably from the perianth. is plant
is a hybrid of F. japonica and F. sachalinensis, probably having been created in Europe. In Hungary, it
might have been an ornamental some time ago which then escaped and naturalized. e majority of
its populations in Hungary are male-fertile, do not produce seed and are reproducing vegetatively. It
is found country-wide mostly in degraded near-natural areas or, more rarely, in synanthropic ruderal
habitats, especially in hilly regions. It is a spreading, dangerously invasive species, which is apparent-
ly almost ineradicable. It is found in ruderal margin vegetation of shaded moist habitats and roadside
weed communities. It is flowering from July to October.
Fallopia ×bohemica (C & C) J. P. B Hybrid or Bohemian knotweed
origin, disTribuTion
A) e native range of F. japonica is in East-Asia, (from north to south) in Russia (South-Sakhalin,
southern Kuril Isles), in Japan (Honshu, Shikoku and Kyushu; 0-2800m), Korea, Central-Eastern China
(50-2500m) and Taiwan (2400-3800m).8 It is very common in Japan – the most precise data are from
there –, occurring mostly in hilly and montane areas.
Its adventive range extends onto several continents. It was first introduced to Europe in 1823 to a Dutch
botanical garden. Shortly aerwards, it was planted not only as an impressive ornamental, but in some
places it was grown as a productive farmland green forage or in well-lit forests and forest edges it was
grown as forage for game animals. It oen escaped, and then naturalized in several places. By today it has
spread into a significant proportion of Europe, including West,9 Central10 and partly in Southeast Europe.
It is thought to have become naturalized in 99% of the British Isles, and 41% of European areas. It has in-
sular occurrence in Scandinavia (up to 70° northern latitude), in the Baltic states, Ukraine and Russia11. In
South Europe it is practically absent from the Iberian, the Apennine and the Greek peninsulas.12 Besides
Europe, it has naturalized throughout North-America,13 from Alaska to Georgia, and it still continues to
expand. ere have been reports on its occurrence in Australia and New Zealand as well.14 As regards its
altitude tolerance, in Europe it is considered to be a plant of colline or lower mountain regions not ex-
panding to higher elevations: Scandinavian mountains (–480 m), South Wales (–320 m), Swiss Alps (–800
m, sometimes 1460–1650 m), Baden-Württemberg (90–1000 m), Erzgebirge (–900 m), Krkonose (Giant
Mountains) (–750 m), Tatra (–860 m). North America: California (–1000 m), Utah (1220–1830 m). Only
va r. japonica has become naturalized. From Britain and the Czech Republic only a single female clone has
been known. Currently, F. japonica is widespread in all countries of the Carpathian Basin, although no
data are known from Serbia. e first information about its wild occurrence in the region (1923; cf. P-
8 Altitude limits of distribution are given in parentheses.
9 It was introduced into the United Kingdom in 1825, and it was first recorded as having escaped in 1886.
10 It was introduced into Germany in 1825, and it was first recorded as having escaped in 1884. It was brought into what is now
the Czech Republic in 1892.
11 In Moscow’s wider surroundings, in the Caucasus region, and in Vladivostok in the Far East.
12 But it occurs in the Mediterranean region of France.
13 USA and Canada; it first naturalized in the 1880s in the northeast states of the US.
14 First in 1935.
19Fallopia japonica, F. sachalinensis and F. ×bohemica
 1957) was reported in general by J (1924), and its subspontaneous occurrence was first record-
ed by K F. along Tisza river at Óbecse (S 1927). About a quarter of a century later, already 18 Hun-
garian settlements were listed (P and S in S 1952). Its occurrence data have increased since
then, especially in the most recent decade. According to U (1973) – although it has sporadically
established in the Great Hungarian Plain region –, it has become frequent in the middle-altitude mountain
range and in Transdanubia, expanding most strongly in the latter regions (S 1980). P (1985)
considers it to have become completely naturalized, found almost everywhere throughout the country.
However, the author of the current study believes, based on observations having been made for more than
one and a half decade that this plant is much less frequent as reported in literature, because many of these
reports probably relate to the hybrid species (B 1998).
B) e native range of F. sachalinensis is also East Asia: it is native to Russia (South Sakhalin, south-
ern Kuril Islands), northern (Hokkaido) and central (northern sections and central part of the western
side of Honshu; 0–1050 m) areas of Japan, being a relatively frequent plant there. (Occurrence and dis-
tribution data of infraspecific taxa of the above two species are listed in the section of morphology.)
Its adventive range is narrower than that of the congener species, but it also extends onto several of
the continents. It was introduced into Europe in 1863: first into the Royal Botanical Garden in Lon-
don, and into the Moscow Zoo. Like in the case of the former species, this one, too – although more
rarely – was planted as an ornamental and as forage. It has naturalized in several parts of Europe, but
has remained much more sporadic. e focus of its distribution is Northeast Europe15 and the north-
ern part of Central Europe16. South of 45° northern latitude there are only Bulgarian occurrence data.
It has other insular occurrence patches in the south of Scandinavia (up to 65° northern latitude), in the
Baltic countries, in Ukraine and in Russia17. Shortly aer its introduction to Europe it was imported to
North America too, and from the middle of the 20th century it has had subspontaneous occurrence data
(California, eastern-central parts of the USA). It was first reported from New Zealand in 1936, from
Australia (Victoria) in 1954, from South Africa (Natal) in 1987 and from India in 2000. As regards its
altitude preference, in Europe it is thought to be a species of colline and submontane regions: Scandi-
navian mountains (–250 m), Baden-Württemberg (90–710 m), Giant Mountains (Krkonose) (–750 m,
on Polica: –895 m); in North America: California (–500 m). From the Carpathian Basin there are only
some sporadic occurrences in Austria, Slovakia and Romania. ere are only few reports on its wild
occurrence in Hungary (the first one: Vácrátót 1949 in P 1957; P 1985). It is probably
that these data concern about hybrid species that were still not described at that time but were similar
in many respects. Until today, its occurrence has been proved only as a planted, botanical garden pant
(e.g. Vácrátót)18, and only in the most recent times was founded its small stand in the Gerecse hills (Vé-
rtestolna, B 2006).
C) Surprisingly the hybrid between F. japonica and F. sachalinensis was not mentioned from Japan
until 1997, when Reynoutria ×mizushimae Yokouchi ex T. Shimizu was described. Its possible reason is
that F. japonica and F. sachalinensis are either not sympatric or if and where they are, any hybrid proge-
ny is poorly adapted. B (2003) found several examples of F. ×bohemica growing in ruderal habitats
in NW Honshu in 1999 and 2000 (all were hexaploid, indicating a cross between octoploid F. japonica
and tetraploid F. sachalinensis). Apparently these hybridizations were a result of the practice of planting
F. japonica along new roadside embankments and cuttings for soil-stabilization purposes. In Europe F.
×bohemica was created probably spontaneously as a hybrid between the above two species. It was dis-
covered in 1982 in Northern Bohemia and described in 1983 by C and C. Its distribu-
tion was studied in only few of the countries. According to such research, it has naturalized in Belgium,
15 It was introduced into the United Kingdom in 1860, and it was first recorded as having escaped in 1896.
16 It was introduced into Germany in 1863 and into what is now the Czech Republic in 1869.
17 In Moscow’s wider surroundings. First date of its introduction: 1864.
18 Botanical Garden of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences: Developmental History and Phytotaxonomy Garden, Polygonaceae
plot. However, escaped populations along the stream Sződ-Rákos flowing in the Botanical Garden are not F. sachalinensis.
20 L. B
British Isles, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France,19 Germany, Hungary, Italy, Nether-
lands, Norway, Poland, Romania, Serbia,20 Slovakia, Switzerland and Ukraine, but most likely in other
countries as well.21 Available records range from 67° in the North to 43° (latitude) in the South and from
10° in the West to 25° in the East (longitude). Outside Europe it has been reported to occur in the USA,
Australia and New Zealand also. It is probably cultivated and probably also escaped in China. As to the
latitudes, European data are available from Norway only: Scandinavian mountains (–250 m). In Hunga-
ry it is mostly the functionally male specimens or populations of the hybrid knotweed, usually not pro-
ducing fruit that are seen. In Hungary, where it is the most frequent among the three species it has con-
tinued to expand considerably in recent times too. To conclude, the synanthropic range of these three
species, including their Hungarian distribution, is most probably expanding and becoming denser.
life cycle
e life cycles and life histories of the three knotweed species – due to their high similarity – can be dealt
with together, with the important differences being specified. ey are probably the tallest polycarpic
(flowering several times) perennial herbaceous plants of the Hungarian flora (apart from liana species).
Being geophytes, it is their extensive, lignescent rhizomes that over-winter. In the native ranges of the
parent species – especially as pioneer species of volcanic terrain – an effective generative way of repro-
duction has vital importance.22 However, this is not true in their synanthropic ranges and in the case of
the hybrid species. As experience shows, the adventive “career” of these species is most likely to be rely-
ing primarily on their effective vegetative reproduction ability. e efficiency is so high that these plants
were studied in the 1980s as the general empirical model of vegetative plant growth.23 During the au-
tumn and winter period, over-wintering buds are generated on the base of the stem and on the lignify-
ing rhizome, to produce new shoots in spring, among which the strongest are the ones emerging on the
crown of the stem base. Rapid shoot development starts at around late March – early April, depending
on the weather. Young shoots might suffer damage from late spring frosts. According to French data, F.
sachalinensis grows in the first three weeks at a rate of 3 cm/day; this rate increases to 5 cm/day by the
third week of May. As the season proceeds, the densely positioned stems with lignified base, developing
from the robust rhizomes, will become suberous on their lower sections. Later on, lateral ramifications
will also develop, thus multiplying total leaf surface of the plant. By that time, however, leaves of the main
stem become yellow, and then fall. Inflorescences start to develop as early as in June. e formation of
functionally dioecious flowers is accompanied by the less intense development and retardation of the ad-
equate parts of the hermaphrodite archaic flowers. Flowering normally starts in the second half of July,
reaching its maximum in August when the plants are the tallest, and lasts until September–October, al-
though plants that are injured can produce flowers and continue flowering until the first frosts. Flowers
are predominantly insect-pollinated (entomogamous). e most frequent visitors of flowers, floral and
extrafloral nectaria are dipterans (Diptera), especially syrphid flies (Syrphidae) and muscid flies (Musci-
dae). Also common are hymenopterans (Hymenoptera), beetles (Coleoptera), Rhynchota and moths and
butterflies (Lepidoptera). If fruits are produced, they will ripen by around September–October, and are
dropped in October–November. Earlier frosts can damage the abscission mechanism in the appropriate
zone of the fruit pedicel, with the result that the fruits stay on the plant way into the winter season, un-
til weather or the birds remove them. eir winged achene fruits are wind-dispersed (anemochorous).
19 In the Mediterranean region too.
20 Data from K. S (pers. comm.)
21 Investigations to clarify actual occurrence data of the parent species and their hybrids in various areas are currently under
22 Germination happens above ground (epigeic), meaning that it is the stem section below the cotyledons (hypocotyl) that ex-
tends, rising up the cotyledons. When F. japonica seeds were investigated, dormancy was broken even at room temperature,
but germination rate was then very low.
23 Recently published a correlated random model for the spatial spread of a rhizome network in F. japonica, which is able to the
practical application in forecasting future disposal costs of existing stands (S et al. 2008).
21Fallopia japonica, F. sachalinensis and F. ×bohemica
In Europe, however, instead of generative reproduction, they spread almost entirely vegetatively.24 ere
are very few evidential data on generative reproduction (i.e. on plant specimens germinating and grow-
ing up under natural conditions). ere are data of seedlings from Germany on the F. ×bohemica hybrid
between F. japonica and F. sachalinensis (A 1998), and from the British Isles on the F. × co n ol -
lyana hybrid between F. japonica and F. baldschuanica.25 Studies in the USA were proved, while clonal
growth is apparent, there is more evidence for sexual reproduction (F  K 2003, G
et al. 2007). Germination experiments conducted in Belgium (T et al. 2007) were showed that F.
japonica produced large quantities of seeds that had germination capacity, but in contrast to the Ameri-
can studies, they did not observed any seedlings in the field. e high occurrence of adult hybrids in the
study area and the observation that there is high genotypic diversity in these hybrids (T et al. 2007),
similar to that observed in Britain (H et al. 1998), indicated that seedling establishment
does occur in the field, albeit probably at a low percentage in comparison to the total seed rain. Further
experiments are needed to assess the best conditions for hybrid seedling establishment. e major dis-
persers of the reproductive parts (rhizome or sometimes stem sections) suitable for the development of
a new individual are humans and water. ese parts are usually transported away from their growing lo-
cations by human mediation (anthropochory), e.g. with garden waste, etc. If it getting to edaphically arid
or ruderal habitats their populations usually become stable and gradually expand. From moist, waterside
habitats, their – mostly vegetative – propagules are transported further by flowing waters (hydrochory).
In addition to the fact that the size of the ligneous stem base (serving as a regenerative complex) grows
with time, laterally expanding rhizomes with regenerative buds also develop even in the first year. ese
can cover a distance of as far as 15–20 m from the plant (of course, depending on soil compactness). e
three knotweed species discussed are sensitive to prolonged dry spells during summer. Leaves fall from
late October, or aer the first frosts at latest (they are sensitive to frost early in the autumn), causing the
stem to die off too. Regeneration ability is the most important characteristic for spreading in the species
of Fallopia sectio Reynoutria. e regeneration rate and shoot mass were significantly affected by geno-
type in F. ×bohemica but not in F. sachalinensis (P et al. 2003). Some phenotypes of F. ×bohemica
exhibit high regeneration potential and the hybrid can be considered as the most successful representa-
tive of the genus Fallopia sectio Reynoutria in terms of regeneration and establishment of new shoots. F.
sachalinensis shows the lowest regeneration ability. e regeneration from stems is less efficient than that
from rhizomes except F. sachalinensis. It could be concluded that rhizomes are more crucial than stems
for the spread of knotweeds through fragmentation and clonal growth, suggesting the importance of soil
disturbance (B  et al. 2003). e examination for a variety of ecological and genetic parameters of
some F. ×bohemica populations in north-eastern France (S et al. 2008) indicates that some
clones are more aggressive than others with a similar chromosome composition. Aggressiveness can be
linked to the absence of seed production and possession of large leaves, which might allow higher stor-
age of nutrients and greater volume of rhizome in the soil. It is illustrative to the differences in the viabil-
ity of these species that during the last century in the Czech Republic F. japonica v ar. japonica has been
spreading significantly faster than F. sachalinensis and the hybrid exhibits twice the rate of invasion of its
parents (M et al. 2004).
habiTaT preference
e distribution area of the parent species, including their Hungarian and synanthropic ranges, is limited
to areas characterized with the following climatic features. Relatively wet summers, regular frost (F. sacha-
linensis: 120 days below 0 °C mean temperature; F. japonica: at least one shorter period below 0 °C mean
temperature), long and mild vegetation period (about 210 days above 5 °C mean temperature), except for
F. japonica occurrence in Northeast Utah (USA) where the summer is too dry. While the entire distribu-
24 e role of F. japonica and F. sachalinensis fruits in the expansion of these species needs to be clarified in further studies.
25 Cf. the footnote in the part of morphology referring the hybrids.
22 L. B
tion range of F. sachalinensis is limited to the temperate phytogeographic zone and sub-oceanic regions,
that of F. japonica includes the sub-meridional–temperate zone and a wider area of oceanic regions: from
oceanic to subcontinental. For this reason , no significant expansion of distributions is expe cted in t heir an-
thropogenic range – unless in the case of climate change –, although it is likely that occurrence frequencies
will increase. It is remarkable the progressive spread of F. ×bohemica (and the absence of F. japonica) in the
mesomediterranean zone of southern France. F. ×bohemica seems to exhibit an ecological ability that is –
contrary to its morphology and physiology – not intermediate between its parents, but reveals new quali-
ties of independent niche adaptation and range widening (B  W 2006).
A) F. japonica has wide ecological amplitude. In its native range it is usually found in higher altitudes
than its congener species. For example, its dwarf variety (F. japonica var. compacta) is one of the most typ-
ical plant species of open, sunny spots of new ash or lava surfaces in volcanic mountains (e.g. Fuji). is
variety produce large amounts of seed, which regularly germinate, and the plants appear to grow as dis-
crete circular stands with little evidence of lateral spread. e rhizomes grow straight down rather than
laterally (B 2003). However the most typical habitat for the tall F. japonica v ar. japonica in Japan
are edge of the forests or riversides in forests, on poor, fast-drying, gravely soils with bad water balance.
Secondary it is frequent along roads, managed pastures too, especially where high nitrogen-level fertil-
izers are used. It oen occurs not in compact stands, but as single well-separated stems, which had long
rhizomes relatively close to the surface (B 2003). It can tolerate extraordinarily harsh environmen-
tal conditions (e.g. its rhizomes withstand months of frozen soil, and survives on extremely acid volcanic
soils (< pH 4). With low absorption values, it also tolerates high sulphur-dioxide pollution present near
active volcanic fumaroles. Its extensive rhizome system stabilizes moving stone debris. Being a plant that
stores nitrogen and other important nutrients, it assists the development of soil, the establishment of oth-
er species, and increases the chances for the development of a more highly organized ecosystem.
In its adventive range, F. japonica occurs in various, relatively productive, usually man-made habitats
with oen disadvantageous features, which can be divided into three groups based on their edaphic char-
acteristics. e first group contains more typically man-made, relatively dry areas or those with ill water-
balance, which are partly pioneer habitats: railway embankments, waste heaps, empty yards, neglected or
abandoned gardens, hedges, ruderal areas, roadsides, etc. e second group, on the contrary, comprises
more near-natural, moister areas: areas along regulated (sometimes unregulated) streams and rivers, em-
bankments and dykes, roadside ditches, forest edges, clear-cut sites, etc. e third main habitat type of its
occurrence is sea coasts (e.g. Norway, Denmark) and salt marshes. All this indicates that indirect and di-
rect disturbance can assist its expansion. e fact that its populations belonging to the first type group are
concentrated in the close surroundings of human settlements is most probably related with its ornamen-
tal uses, with the effects of human soil disturbance, and with the rarer late autumn frosts and summer
droughts. is species has wide pH-tolerance (3.0–8.5), but normally prefers limy soils. It is not choosy as
regards soil type, and tolerates high levels of heavy metal and salt pollution. In North American investi-
gations on F. japonica and F. ×bohemica were proved that plasticity in salt tolerance traits may allow these
taxa to live in saline habitats without specific adaptation to tolerate salt (R et al. 2008). Some-
what contradictorily with its Hungarian name (“floodplain Japanese knotweed”), this plant in Hungary
is found primarily (as observed by the author) in places where it escaped from its former planting sites,
mostly in settlements’ ruderal habitats, or sometimes in degraded near-natural habitat types. us, in
Hungary it is rather urbanophilous species. According to G et al. (1988) it has competitor strategy.
B) In its original distribution F. sachalinensis lives in forest edges, along forest trails, on scree habi-
tats of montane areas, on seaside rocks, riversides, abandoned lands and along public roads. Generally,
it prefers alluvial lowlands with higher temperature, lower elevation and constant water supply in the
vegetative season. However, sometimes – similarly to the other species – it does occur as a pioneer colo-
nizer of recently formed bare volcanic surfaces, or along alpine gullies and flowing waters.
In its adventive range F. sachalinensis is present in the first two major habitat groups mentioned
above for the congener species. However, the occupancy rates of warmer and dryer ruderal habitats
23Fallopia japonica, F. sachalinensis and F. ×bohemica
in urban areas vs. wetter and colder habitats of mountainous areas vary highly and characteristically
among areas within Europe. For example, in Poland it is known from forests mostly, whereas in France
it is typically found on vast alluvial lowlands and islands of alpine rivers.
C) e habitats of F. ×bohemica, known so far from Europe, belong to three groups on the basis of
edaphic features, similarly to the case of F. japonica.26 e author has found it to be an urbano-neutral
species in Hungary, although it is present primarily in degraded moist, near-natural areas (along rivers,
streams of hills and mountains, floodplains, sometimes along intensively used forest trails, and only sec-
ondly in more strongly anthropogenic, ruderal habitats. It favors highly exposed situations with no cov-
erage, but can appear in shaded forest areas too in which case its stands appear to be less dense.
A) In its native range F. japonica is a pioneer species of riversides and shallows: the Polygonum cuspida-
tum association (Penniseto-Artemision principis, Artemisietea principis) is a 40-100 cm high, relatively
species-poor one, characterized with the dominance of the name-giving species. It is found in other –
mostly tall herb – associations too, where vegetation is somewhat higher (50–150 cm). It plays an im-
portant role in the succession of volcanic surfaces where it is a constituent of natural pioneer plant as-
sociations. During succession it is normally grass patches of Miscanthus sinensis that accompany this
knotweed species, then, aer about 50 years, this grass will become dominant with other grass species,
to be followed by woody vegetation in the habitat.
In its adventive range, F. japonica (just like the two other species) has very low sociability. In the ma-
jority of cases it forms more or less continuous, homogeneous stands. For this reason, phytosociological
literature treats these as associations signified by the name of the species only, or just as stands (F. j a po n -
ica association, F. japonica stands). However, it can be additionally specified what types of associations
these stands co-occur with. According to more recent Central-European literature (N et al. 1993,
O  M 1994) these are: willow and alder bushes, montane alder galleries along streams
(Stellario-Alnetum, S.-Petasitetum), garlic mustard (Alliarion), burdock (Arction lappae) and sweet clover
associations (Dauco-Melilotion). Applying the derived association concept which was first used about 25
years ago – and which focuses on the dominating species – Japanese knotweed tall herb associations are
also differentiated (Fallopia japonica-Senecion fluviatilis) (M et al. 1993), comprising the F. j a po n i -
ca extreme facies of the Impatienti-Solidaginetum association and the Polygonetum cuspidati association.
In the diagnostic species combination with dominant and constant accompanying species, the dominant
species is F. japonica, whereas stinging nettle (Urtica dioica), bishop’s goatweed (Aegopodium podagrar-
ia) and stickywilly (Galium aparine) are subdominant species. e latter are tolerant of shading; Urtica
and Aegopodium are tough clonal plants. Coenosystematically, F. japonica has been classified in various
association units, for example in Germany S (1962): Senecion fluviatilis, O & M
(1983): Galio-Urticenea; in the Czech Republic H & S (1990): Convolvuletalia sepium and La-
mio albi-Chenopodietalia boni-henrici. According to S (1970), Japanese knotweed in Hungary is typi-
cally found in gallery forests, oak woods (Quercetum petraeae-cerris), floodplain weed associations (Cus-
cuto-Calystegietum), forest edges and gardens; and is considered to be a Calystegion sepium species and
a character species of alluvial weed associations (Senecion fluviatilis) . B (1995), too, classifies it as
a Calystegion sepium species, but according to S (2000) it is a Calystegietalia-type species, which is
validly called today (B  S 1999) Convolvuletalia sepium (moist, edge vegetation). e lat-
ter authors categorize all three species as new, floristically incomplete and unbalanced neophyte associa-
tion elements of semi-arid and moist forest weed vegetation types. All these categorizations mentioned
above provide a view of the phytosociological character of F. japonica.
B) In its original distribution, F. sachalinensis can be characterized with the following major veg-
etation-typical features. Firstly, it is a member of the so-called giant herb communities, that forms of
26 Cf. also with the establishment respecting the salt tolerance of F. japonica.
24 L. B
1.5-3 m height and nearly 100% coverage (Angelico-Polygonetum sachalinensis, Cirsio kamtschatici-
Polygonetum sachalinensis) occurring in forest edges, mountain terrain covered with rocky debris, sea-
side rocks and riversides. Secondly – similarly to the congener species –, it is one of the first colonizer
species of newly formed volcanic terrain surfaces, establishing themselves in such areas within the ini-
tial couple of years.27 Later on, trees that gradually settle in depending on knotweed density will shade
out knotweed populations from such habitats within a few decades. Its almost homogeneous stands are
found making up the pioneer vegetation of newly formed barren surfaces in human settlements.
In its adventive range the phytosociological characteristics of F. sachalinensis – just like its habitats –
are similar to those of F. japonica, although exact phytosociological data are deficient. O &
M (1983) regard it as a Galio-Urticenea species, H  S (1990) as Convolvuletalia sepium
and Lamio albi-Chenopodietalia boni-henrici species, whereas L  S (1992) relate it with
associations of moist forest weed associations along streams (Aegopodion), and, as an epecophyte, with
associations of ruderal habitats. B  S (1999) treat it together with the other two knot-
weed species, although valuable data are not available from Hungary.
C) e phytosociological relations of F. ×bohemica have been less studied in Europe. However, a con-
siderable proportion of such data on F. japonica are probably about the hybrid species. Nevertheless, the
occurrence preferences of the hybrid in Hungary (described earlier in the section on habitats) seem to be
valid in this respect, too, and are thought by the author to be unlike those typical of F. japonica. According-
ly, it is most frequent in ruderal margin associations of rather near-natural, shaded and moist habitats (Ga-
lio-Urticetea), more specifically, in vegetation types characterized with alluvial weed associations (Senecion
fluviatilis).28 If all Hungarian populations are regarded, its proportions in highly anthropogenic roadside
weed vegetation (Artemisietea vulgaris) have only secondary importance. It can be noted that already some
populations growing in beech forests are known to exist. Communities dominated by F. ×bohemica re-
corded in the Mediterranean Sea (France) characterized by thermophilic species, which composition typi-
cal of the (meso-) Mediterranean region, especially at riparian sites (B  W 2006).
bioTic inTeracTions
Japanese knotweed species show a typical example of allelopathic mechanisms which are among the
most effective means of competition between plants. Reynoutriin was separated from F. japonica leaves
(Q-3-xyloside), whereas terpenoid: triterpene (sterol), phenoloid: tannin, flavonoid (quercetin glc), and
anthrachinone (emodin) compounds were found in F. sachalinensis. e results of American experi-
ments suggest that allelopathic interference or interaction with microbial soil organisms may contribute
to the lack of native species in populations of F. ×bohemica (S  B 2007).
Although in the adventive range, knotweeds have little in the way of competition from plants other than
trees, in their native range (Japan) they must additionally cope with climbers, twiners and other mem-
bers of the native giant herb communities. Even the commonly found grass, Miscanthus sinensis grows up
to 2 m in height, parasitic Cuscuta taxa are strong enough to bring down the plants and Pueraria lobata
with its vigorous smothering growth and Wisteria with its dense tangling growth provide worthy com-
petition (B 2003). In the same time an interesting indicator of Japanese knotweed toughness and
vitality is the fact that among species of species poor communities of areas depleted by the falling guano
of cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo) nesting colonies in Japan, the highest surviving coverage is made up
by F. japonica (I 1996).
27 Owing to its strong ability to produce offshoots, it is capable of emerging from below 0.5-1.0 m thick volcanic sediment, rap-
idly creating dense stands, and regenerating older colonies buried under the sediment.
28 Here it oen co-occurs with other alien, invasive tall herbs or lianas, such as adventive Aster species, Echinocystis lobata, Helianth us
tuberosus s.l., Humulus japonicus, Impatiens glandulifera, Parthenocissus inserta, Rudbeckia laciniata or Solidago gigantea.
25Fallopia japonica, F. sachalinensis and F. ×bohemica
In their adventive range, in addition to allelopathic effects, the success of these three knotweed spe-
cies is ensured by other important features such as shading and subterraneous nutrient depletion. With
their early-starting and rapidly proceeding growth they occupy the air space before other species could
develop, by shading them off gradually with their dense stems and foliage mass, eventually taking away
almost all the available light. In addition, their rhizome system grows rampantly, and the plants inten-
sively remove the nutrients from the soil, thus taking over the ground, too, from their competitors. All
these together, result in an almost 100% inhibition of germination and growth in co-occurring species.
ere are only few exceptions from this, mostly plants growing and producing fruit in the early spring
period (e.g. Ficaria verna, Veronica hederifolia). It is only a few liana species that sometimes are able to
overcome its aggressive, monodominant stands, such as Clematis vitalba, Humulus lupulus, Echinocystis
lobata or Calystegia sepium. Investigating the stands of the three Fallopia species along a north Bohe-
mian river the authors concluded that the species richness of communities has no influence on the suc-
cess of Fallopia invasion; the combination of environmental conditions and propagule spread is more
important to the invasion success than the number of species in the host community. Fallopia inva-
sion greatly reduces species diversity.29 F. japonica invaded more habitat types than F. sachalinensis and
F. ×bohemica. e hybrid F. ×bohemica out-competes the parental taxa at sites where both taxa occur
(Bet al. 2004). American researchers used a factorial transplant experiment to assess whether
light limitation, nutrient limitation, or allelopathic interference by Fallopia ×bohemica reduces growth
or survival of two native species. e results in combination with the outcome of a cutting experiment
suggest that F. ×bohemica achieves competitive superiority primarily by limiting access to light. Species-
specific effects and significant interaction effects particularly of light and activated carbon suggest ad-
ditional mechanisms (S  B 2007).
A) e highest amount of data is available on F. japonica. In Japan its leaves were consumed by chry-
somelid beetles which could reduce them to a delicate tracery of veins as well as various lepidopteran
and sawfly larvae. Upper stems frequently bore the exit holes of stem boring larvae. Below ground, the
large larvae of the Japanese swi moth (Endoclita excrescens) bored cylindrical holes through the thick
rhizomes, and their damage and old exit holes were a common feature of knotweed rhizomes in Japan.
Another herbivore the Asian longhorn beetle (Anoplophora glabripennis). Beyond these the aphid in-
festations and various rust infections decrease the leaf area (B 2003). Its herbivores known from
Europe are the followings: mammals: in the British Isles, the epigeous shoots were grazed by sheep,
cattle, goats, horses and donkeys. Rhizomes however are toxic to some farm animals. Grazing by sheep
and cattle early in the summer had a signicant negative eect on shoot density. Birds: house spar-
rows (Passer domesticus) were observed to feed on seeds. Acarids: Tetranychus urticae (Tetranychi-
dae). Insects: only very few insect herbivores were identified on Japanese knotweeds; this may be one
of the reasons for the success of knotweeds discussed; Butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera): Spilarctia
lutea, Spilosoma lubricipeda (Arctiidae), Apatele megacephala (Caradrinidae), Phlogophora meticulosa
(Noctuidae), Taeniocampa gothica, Orthosia circellaris (Orthosiidae), Inachis io (Nymphalidae), and
other larvae belonging to the families Noctuidae and Geometridae, not having been identified so far;
Beetles (Coleoptera): Phyllobius pyri, Otiorhynchus sulcatus (Curculionidae), Gastroidea (Gastrophy-
za) viridula, Chrysolina fastuosa (Chrysomelidae). Neither endoparasitic nor ectoparasitic nematodes
have been found.
B) Data are deficient in the case of F. sachalinensis. One polyphagous moth (Spilarctia lutea, Arc-
tiidae) and one aphid was found on this knotweed species in Europe (Germany). Spilarctia lutea was
equally successful on this knotweed and on its original native host plant Rumex obtusifolius. It is an in-
teresting aspect to this topic that this knotweed species (and maybe the other two as well) attract ants
with their extrafloral nectaria, possibly increasing protection against insect herbivores.
29 Similar results have been found by Hungarian authors too (B & B-D 2007).
26 L. B
C) Data on herbivores feeding on F. ×bohemica are available from Germany only. Moths (Lepi-
doptera): Spilarctia lutea (Arctiidae). Beetles (Coleoptera): Gastroidea (Gastrophyza) viridula (Chry-
somelidae). Dipterans (Diptera): Pegomya nigritarsis (Anthomyidae). Undetermined acarid species are
also observed. Gastroidea (Gastrophyza) viridula had only 15% growth compared with its individuals
feeding on their native host plant Rumex obtusifolius.
A) In case of F. japonica, no parasitic fungi have been found. Among pathogenic saprophytic fungi, the
following have been identified. Ascomycotina: Amphorula sachalinensis (Great Britain), Ceriospora po-
lygonacearum (Great Britain), Chaetoconis polygonii (Great Britain), Cytospora polygoni-seiboldi (Great
Britain), Glomerella cingulata (Japan), Myxosporium polygoni (Great Britain), Pezizella effugiens. Basidi-
omycotina: Puccinia phragmitis (Japan), Puccinia polygoni-amphibii (Japan), Puccinia polygoni-weyrichii
(Japan). Deuteromycotina: Alternaria sp. (Germany), Cladosporium sp. (Japan), Colletotrichum gloeo-
sporioides (Great Britain), Endophragmia cesatii (Germany), Epicoccum sp. (Germany.), Fusarium sp.
(Japan), Helminthosporium sp. (Japan), Phoma spp. (Great Britain, Japan, Germany) incl. Phoma anceps
va r. polygoni and Ph. polygonorum, Phomopsis polygonorum. Further sixteen plurivorous microfungi
have been reported from growing and dead stems.
B) In F. sachalinensis the following saprophytic fungi have been identified: Ascomycotina: Ceriospora
polygonacearum, Myxosporium polygoni; Deuteromycotina: Phomopsis polygonorum, Phoma polygono-
C) No data are available for F. ×bohemica.
No mycorrhiza was found when samples from F. japonica in the British Isles and F. sachalinensis in Po-
land were investigated.
economic imporTance
Due to their rapid growth resembling that of bamboo species, F. japonica and F. sachalinensis have been
planted as ornamentals for quite long, especially in the lawn of gardens and parks, and on watersides.
Because of the high protein content of their leaves, experiments were made for their cultivation as for-
age for domestic and game animals.
A) Several medicinal uses of F. japonica are known to exist.30 In addition to that, there are also some
ethnobotanical uses as well: for example World War II troops used its leaves as tobacco. Young shoots are
said to have been used for salads, because their taste resembles that of almonds. If cooked, it is suitable
for dishes prepared similarly to asparagus or as puree. It can also be used as a substitute for rhubarb, to be
accompanied by a specially prepared sour sauce. Recently, its utilization for purifying soils contaminated
by heavy metals was also suggested, because it can accumulate those metals in its leaves and stem.
B) F. sachalinensis used to be popular among German hunters because it was hypothesized that it is
tastier for game animals than F. japonica, and it also seemed suitable for lurking during hunting. In Rus-
30 In traditional Japanese and Chinese medicine, its dried rhizomes are recommended for curing the following diseases: pu-
rulent dermatitis, gonorrhoea, favus, Dermatophyton mycosis and hyperlipemia. Some probable agents have been shown by
K et al. (1983). One of the acting agents (resveratrol) is thought to have bactericidal and fungicidal impact, which had a
reducing effect of cholesterol level in rats. e extracted drug called emodin had an inhibiting effect on the intestinal parasitic
trematode Schistosoma japonicum. e active drug content of this species used in Chinese medicine also for healing burns was
analyzed by M (1991) (partly supported by S L. Gy.).
27Fallopia japonica, F. sachalinensis and F. ×bohemica
sia, it was used as silage too.31 In its native range, sometimes there are so many larvae living in the inter-
nodal sections of the stem that they are oen used by anglers as a source of bait. Its rhizome is thought
to be suitable for curing a number of diseases; the active drugs are anthrachinone-derivatives. In some
places of Japan its young and tender shoots are eaten. In Europe, recently it has been discovered that it
is effective against fungal plant diseases. e extract made from its leaves proved to be suitable against
mildew on apple, begonia, cucumber, wheat, and the botrytis of sweet pepper. In hot climates, its huge
leaves are used for shading fruits in the market.
C) By taking advantage (not actively growing!) of the functionally male, non-fruiting F. ×bohemica
stands, utilization ways similar to those of the parent species could be revealed: food, medicine, pesti-
cides, purification of heavy metal contaminated soils, stabilization of waste heaps, etc.
F. sachalinensis was recommended in the USA for stabilizing embankments on riversides, but this later
proved to be unwise, because wherever it was used for such purpose, its spreading went uncontrolla-
ble. It is also possible, although actually no such information have arisen yet, that F. japonica was also
planted in Europe some time for the same purpose. ese three knotweeds (incl. F. ×bohemica) are
less recommended today for being used even as garden ornamental plants. High standard gardening
books ornamental plant and botanical garden catalogues (index seminum) nowadays particularly call
the attention to the difficulties and threat meant by the escaping and control of this (and similar inva-
sive) species. Knotweed stands, spreading along flowing water bodies, cause problems in accessibility,
flow rate, and increase the maintenance costs of regulated river sections, by damaging flood preven-
tion engineering objects. In settlement environment they can damage traffic infrastructure: crack side-
walk surfaces, or can even penetrate through weaker paved roads. ey can suppress plants and hedges
planted in parks, along roads and watersides. Fortunately, they only very seldom appear as weeds in
agricultural areas. In California, for example, both species are considered as harmful weeds, F. sacha-
linensis “forming densely infested areas (H 1993). However, it is not specified in the literature
source mentioned whether these plants cause only” nature conservation problems or they are also an
agricultural weed.
naTure conservaTion significance
Although such problems caused by these knotweed species are not new ones, the attention of nature
conservation organizations has turned towards them only recently.32 With their expanding polycor-
mons they form almost entirely homogeneous stands in which only few species appear occasionally,
but even so the majority of these species are unable to reach generative stage. rough direct or indi-
rect human mediation, they can establish well in natural or near-natural habitats as well or even spread
there, depending on the vegetation type affected there. In the invaded areas they strongly inhibit natu-
ral succession and regeneration processes and spontaneous reforestation, but also drastically reduce the
survival chances of herbaceous associations. By excluding members of the original flora and vegetation
in the habitat, they reduce the biodiversity of plants, and through that, of animals too, and thus are det-
rimental to biodiversity in general. eir control is very difficult, and any intervention with chemicals
brings about nature conservation concerns. For these reasons – although these knotweed species occur
in a variety of habitats – the most problematic from the aspect of nature conservation is their expansion
in near-natural, waterside habitats.
31 e first piece of such data is from 1864.
32 Occasionally, warnings have been released, for example the United States Department of Agriculture called the attention to
the rampant, aggressive spreading ability of F. sachalinensis as early as in the late 19th century.
28 L. B
Monographs: G et al. 1988, B et al. 1, S  K , A , S  M ,
C  W , B 2003, W 2003, B , W et al. 2005. Taxonomy: S , O , H-
 , H , C , L  K , C  C , B  C ,
S  S , a, R D  A , B , , , H et al. 1998, E-
  S 2000, M et al. 2003, 2005, P et al. 2003, Z et al. 2003, B & W 2006, G-
 et al. 2007, G et al. 2007, S et al. 2008. Morphology: O 1965, H 1978, L  K 1981,
C & C 1983, B & C 1985, S  S 1985, 1986a, M  D , H 1991,
S  S 1991, 1992, 1993, B & S 1992, W 1993, B et al. 1995, 1996, A et al. 1995a, 1995b,
F  E 1997, K et al. 1997, B 1998, FT-G 2000, Z et al. 2003, B & W-
 2006. Origin, distribution: S 1927, 1970, 1980, P 1997, G  W 1965, O 1965, C 1977, C
& C 1983, S  S 1985, 1986a, JS 1988, S  S 1988, M  D ,
B , , L. L. U. , N et al. , P 1994, P  P 1994, S 1994, A
et al. 1995a, B et al. 1995, 1996, J 1995, S  S 1995, F  E 1997, S 1997, W 1997,
W et al. 1997, B 1998, 2001, F 1998, M  O 1998, FT-G 2000, Y  M-
 (2001), P et al. 2003, M et al. 2004, B & W 2006, B 2006, K 2006, B et al. 2008.
Life cycle: V , F 1957, M  1976, K  et al. 1988, N  T 1988, B & W 1992, B
, , M et al. 1993, B 1994, P  P , B , B et al. , H  P 1995, A
et al. 1996, N & M     1996, H 1997, S 1997, S  M 1997, M  P 1998, H
 Ð 1999, H  B 2000,  W 2001, P et al. 2001, S , B et al. 2003, F
K 2003, P et al. 2003, G et al. 2007, S  B 2007, T et al. 2007, S et al. 2008, S et
al. 2008. Habitat preference: M 1958, S 1962, O 1965, S 1970, 1980, D et al. 1983, O & M-
 1983, H  T 1984, S  S 1986b, S 1987, M  B 1988, S  S 1988,
M 1989, B 1990, 1993, 1994, K  G 1991, L  S 1992, A 1993, M 1993, N et
al. , P  P , B et al. 1994, B  P 1994, P 1994, P 1994,  W et al. 1995, P
1995, S  S 1995, A et al. 1996, F  E 1997, S 1997, W et al. 1997, H  Ð
1999, B 2000, 2001, BP 2000, B  et al. 2004, B & W 2006, R et al. 2008. Biotic in-
teractio ns: H  H , Z  T 1991a, 1991b, B  D , F  H 1994, D
 H 1995, M 1996, S 1997, S 2001, B  et al. 2004, B & B-D 2007. Economic i mpor-
tance: B 1932, H 1974, H 1981, M  D , C et al. 1983, H et al. 988, S  K
1991, S R 1992, P 1994, K  S 1998, H et al. 2000. Nature conser vation signifi-
cance: S  K 1991, P 1994, S 1997, W 1997, K  S 1998, B .
A, N., T, I.  T, M. (1996): Nitrogen translocation via rhizome systems in monoclonal stands of Rey-
noutria japonica in an oligothropic desert on Mt Fuji: field experiments. Ecological Research 11: 175–186.
A, C. (1993): Zur Strategie und Vergesellschaung des Neophyten Polygonum cuspidatum unter besonderer Berücksichti-
gung der Mahd. Tüxenia 13: 373–397.
A, B. (1998): Biologie, Ökologie, Verbreitung und Kontrolle von Reynoutria-Sippen in Baden-Württemberg. Culterra
(Freiburg) 23: 1–198, I–LIV.
A, B., B, M., B, R.  K, W. (1995): Reynoutria-Arten in Baden-Württemberg – Schlüssel zur
Bestimmung und ihre Verbreitung entlang von Fließgewässern. Floristische Rundbriefe (Bochum) 29(2): 113–124.
A, B., K, W.  B, R. (1995): Genetische und morphologische Unterscheide bei der Gattung Reynoutria.
In: B, R., G, H., K, W.  S. S-F (Hrsg.), Gebietsfremde Pflanzenarten. Auswirkungen auf
einheimische Arten, Lebensgemeinschaen und Biotope. Kontrollmöglichkeiten und Managment, Ecomed Verlagsgesellscha
AG & Co. K. G., Landsberg, pp. 113–124.
B, J. P. (1990): Breeding behavior and seed production in alien giant knotweed in the British Isles. e biology of invasive
plants; a BES industrial Ecology Group, R. Mooreheads  Laing, Ruthin, pp. 110–120.
B, J. P. (1992): e Haringey Knotweed. Urban Nature Magazin 1(3): 50–51.
B, J. P. (1994): Reproductive biology and fertility of Fallopia japonica (Japanese knotweed) and its hybrids in the British Isles.
In:  W, L. C., C, L. E., W, M.  B, J. H. (eds.), Ecology and management of invasive riverside plants, John
Wiley and Sons, Chichester, pp. 141–158.
B, J. P. (2001): Fallopia ×conollyana, the Railway-yard Knotweed. Watsonia 23: 539–541.
B, J. P. (2003): Japanese knotweed s.l. at home and abroad. In: C, L., B, J., B, G., P, K., P, P., W,
P. M .  W, M. (eds.), Plant invasions: Species ecology and ecosystem management, Backhuys Publishers, Leiden,
pp. 183–196.
B, J. P.  C, P. (1984): A putative Reynoutria × Fallopia hybrid from Wales. Watsonia 15: 162–163.
B, J. P.  C, P. (1985): Chromosome numbers of some alien Reynoutria species in the British Isles. Watsonia 15:
B, J. P.  S, C. A. (1992): Chromosome number, morphology, pairing, and DNA values of species and hybrids in the ge-
nus Fallopia (Polygonaceae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 180: 29–52.
B, J. P., C, L. E.  C, P. (1996): A survey of the distribution of Fallopia ×bohemica (Chrtek & Chrtková) J. Bailey
(Polygonaceae) in the British Isles. Watsonia 21: 187–198.
B, J. P., C, L. E.  W, M. (1995): Assessment of the genetic variation and spread of British populations of Fallopia
japonica and its hybrid Fallopia ×bohemica. In: P, P., P, K., R, M.  W, M. (eds.), Plant invasions. Gen-
eral aspects and special problems, SPB Academic Publishing, Amsterdam, pp. 141–150.
29Fallopia japonica, F. sachalinensis and F. ×bohemica
B, J. & W, R. (2006): e distribution and origins of Fallopia ×bohemica (Polygonaceae) in Europe. Nordic Jour-
nal of Botany 24(2): 173–200.
B L. (1998): Külső alaktani megfigyelések a Fallopia ×bohemica (Chrtek & Chrtková) J. Bailey (F. japonica × F. sachalinen-
sis) hibridfaj magyarországi jelenlétének alátámasztásához. (Exomorphological observations in support of the presence of the
hybrid species Fallopia ×bohemica in Hungary.) Kitaibelia (): –. (in Hungarian with English summary)
B L. (2000): Japánkeserűfű-állományok társulástani vizsgálatának egy módszere és tapasztalatai. (Experiences on a method
used for coenological investigations of Fallopia ×bohemica stands in Western Hungary.) Kitaibelia (): –. (in Hungarian
with English summary)
B, L. (): Invasive alien plants threatening the natural vegetation of Őrség Landscape Protection Area (Hungary). In:
B, G., B, J., C, I., C, L.  W, M. (eds.), Plant invasions: Species ecology and ecosystem manage-
ment, Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp. 185–197.
B, L. (): Japánkeserűfű-fajok (Fallopia sectio Reynoutria). In: M, B.  B-D, Z. (eds.), Biológiai inváz-
iók Magyarországon – Özönnövények. [Biological invasions in Hungary – Invasive plants.], A KvVM Természetvédelmi Hi-
vatalának tanulmánykötetei 9, TermészetBÚVÁR Alapítvány Kiadó, Budapest, pp. 207–253. (in Hungarian)
B, L. & B-D, Z. (2007): Impact of Fallopia ×bohemica and Helianthus tuberosus on the richness and composition
of plant communities in Western Hungary. In: 9th International Conference on the Ecology and Management of Alien Plant In-
vasions (EMAPi9), 17–21 Sept. 2007, Hyatt Regency, Perth. Program & Abstract Book, p. 175.
B L., D I. & K G. (2008): Preliminary report on the grid-based mapping of invasive plants in Hungary. In:
R W. , E F., K F. (eds.), Biological invasions – from ecology to conservation. NEOBIOTA (Berlin)
7: 105–114.
B L., T B. & S T. A. (1994): Patakkísérő invazív gyomok (Helianthus, Humulus, Impatiens, Reynoutria,
Rubus, Sambucus, Solidago és Urtica) állományainak számítógépes elemzése Szombathely térségében. (Computer analysis of
invasive weed communities (Helianthus, Humulus, Impatiens, Reynoutria, Rubus, Sambucus, Solidago and Urtica) along the
Perint brook, Szombathely, W-Hungary.) Proceedings of Berzsenyi College (Szombathely) IX. Natural sciences 4: 73–99. (in
Hungarian with English summary)
B, Z. (2006): A Gerecse hegység flórájának katalógusa. (Flora of the Gerecse Mountains.) Magyar Természettudományi
Múzeum és a Duna–Ipoly Nemzeti Park Igazgatóság, Budapest. (in Hungarian with English summary)
B, D. J. (1990): e ecology and control of Japanese knotweed (Reynoutria japonica Houtt.) and Himalayan balsam (Im-
patiens glandulifera) on river banks in South Wales. PhD thesis, University of Wales, Cardiff.
B, D. J. (1993): e impact of temperature on the northern distribution limits of the introduced species Fallopia japonica
and Impatiens glandulifera in north-west Europe. Journal of Biogeography 20: 45–53.
B, D. J. (1994): Predicting the response of the introduced species Fallopia japonica and Impatiens glandulifera to global
climatic change. In:  W, L. C., C, L. E., W, M.  B, J. H. (eds.), Ecology and management of invasive river-
side plants, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, pp. 135–139.
B, D. J., B, J. P.  C, A. P. (1994): Fallopia japonica (Houtt.) Ronse Decr. (Reynoutria japonica Houtt.; Polygo-
num cuspidatum Sieb. & Zucc.). Journal of Ecology 82: 959–979.
B, D. J.  D, H. A. (1993): Abundance and diversity of invertebrates associated with Fallopia japonica (Houtt.)
Ronse Decraene and Impatiens glandulifera Royle: two alien plant sepcies in the British Isles. Entomologist 12: 127–139.
B, D. J.  P, J. P. 1994. Status of Fallopia japonica (Japanese knotweed) in Wales. In:  W, L. C., C, L. E., W,
M.  B, J. H. (eds.) Ecology and management of invasive riverside plants, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, pp. 199–211.
B, K., M, B.  K, I. (2004): How does Reynoutria invasion fit the various theories of invasibility? Journal
of Vegetation Science 15: 495–504.
B, K., M, B.  P, P. (2003): Experimental study of vegetative regeneration in four invasive Reynoutria taxa (Po-
lygonaceae). Plant Ecology 166: 1–11.
B, J. (1982): Fruchtbildung und Verbreitung des Japanischen Staudenknöterichs. Natura 79(9): 223–225.
B, C. (1932): Polygonum L., Knöterich. In: Parey’s Blumengärtnerei. Erster Band. Parey, Berlin, pp. 511–514.
B, J.  P, P. (2000): Establishment and survival of three invasive taxa of the genus Reynoutria (Polygonaceae) in mesic
mown meadows: a field experimental study. Folia Geobotanica 35: 27–42.
B, J. (1995): Technical note: Standing crop of Reynoutria japonica in the autumn of 1991 in the United Kingdom. Preslia
(Praha) 66(1994): 337–343.
B, J., C, L. E.,  W, L. C.  W, M. (1995): e invasive nature of Fallopia japonica is enhanced by vegetative re-
generation from stem tissues. In: P, P., P, K., R, M.  W, M. (eds.), Plant invasions. General aspects and
special problems, SPB Academic Publishing, Amsterdam, pp. 131–139.
B, J.  W, M. (1992): Regeneration of Japanese knotweed (Fallopia japonica) from rhizome and stems: observations from
greenhouse trials. IXème Colloque International sur la Biologie des Mauvaises Herbes, Dijon, France, pp. 85–94.
C, H-J, M, H-S  L, Y-J (1983): Anthraquinones from the rhizome of Polygonum sachalinense.
Yakhak Hoeji 27: 37–43.
C, L.  W, M. (2000): e Japanese knotweed manual. e management and control of an invasive alien weed. Packard
Publishing Limited, Chichester.
C, J.  C, A. (1983): Reynoutria ×bohemica, nový køiženec z èeledi rdesnovitých. (Reynoutria ×bohemica, eine
neue Hybride aus der Familie Polygonaceae.) Casopis narodniho muzea v Praze, r. prir. 152(2): 120.
C, A. P. (1977): e distribution and history in the British Isles of some alien species of Polygonum and Reynoutria. Wa t -
sonia 11: 291–311.
C, A. (1981): An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
 W, L. C. (2001): A viability study of Fallopia japonica stem issue. Weed Research 41: 447–460.
 W, L. C., C, L. E.  W, M. (1995): e management of three alien invasive riparian plants: Impatiens glandulifera
(Himalayan balsam), Heracleum mantegazzianum (giant hogweed) and Fallopia japonica (Japanese knotweed). In: H,
D. M.  F, A. J. D. (eds.), e ecological basis of river management. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, pp. 315–321.
30 L. B
D, M.  H, K. (1995): Am Japanknöterich vorkommende Pathogene: Ansatz zu einer biologischen Regulierung. In:
B, R., G, H., K, W.  S. S-F (Hrsg.), Gebietsfremde Pflanzenarten. Auswirkungen auf
einheimische Arten, Lebensgemeinschaen und Biotope. Kontrollmöglichkeiten und Managment, Ecomed Verlagsgesellscha
AG & Co. K. G., Landsberg, pp. 173–178.
D, H., O, A.  N, H. (1983): Die Ufervegetation der Fließgewässer des Westharzes und seines Vorlandes.
Naturschutz und Landschaspflege in Niedersachsen, Beihe, He 4.
E, N. C.  S, K. A. (2000): Hybridization as a stimulus for the evolution of invasiveness in plants? Pro-
ceedings of the National Academy of Science 97: 7043–7050.
F, A. (1998): Spreading reconstruction of invasive species of Fallopia genus in Pozitavská Pahorkatina region in Slovakia. In:
Invasions and invasive organisms. 2nd scientific conference. Nitra, Nov. 18–20. 1998, p. 29.
F, B.  T-G, B. (2000): Reynoutria ×bohemica (Polygonaceae) – nowy takson we florze Polski. Fragmenta Flo-
ristica et Geobotanica Polonica 7: 63–71.
F, J.  K, R. (2003): Sexual reproduction in the invasive species Fallopia japonica (Polygonaceae). American Journal
of Botany 90: 586–592.
F, S. V.  H, A. N. G. (1994): Classical biological control for exotic invasive weeds in riparian and aquatic habitats –
practice and prospects. In:  W, L. C., C, L. E., W, M.  B, J. H. (eds.), Ecology and management of invasive
riverside plants, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, pp. 173–182.
F, E.  E, R. (1997): Fremmede planter i Norge. De store Fallopia-artene (Alien plants in Norway. e large Fallo-
pia species). Blyttia 55(1): 3–14.
F, C. (1957): Sur le developpement des structures de l’appereil souterrain du Polygonum cuspidatum Sieb. et Zucc. Bulletin
de la Societe Botanique de France 104: 141–147.
G, M. A., G, J. L., T, D.  K, R. (2007): Molecular and morphological evidence reveals introgres-
sion in swarms of the invasive taxa Fallopia japonica, F. sachalinensis, and F. ×bohemica (Polygonaceae) in the United States.
American Journal of Botany 94(6): 948–956.
G, S. A.  W, C. (1965): e genera of Polygonaceae in the southeastern United States. J. Arnold Arb. 46: 91–121.
G, J. P., H, J. G.  H, R. 1988. Reynoutria japonica Houtt. Japanese Knotweed (Data refer to var. japonica). In:
Comparative plant ecology. Unwin Hyman, London, pp. 488–489.
G, J. L., T, D., G, M. A.  K, R. (2007): Genetic diversity and clonal vs. sexual reproduction in Fal-
lopia spp. (Polygonaceae). American Journal of Botany 94(6): 957–964.
H, S. (1991): Nokre store artar av slirekne, Polygonum L. s.l., i Noreg. Blyttia 91(4): 183–190.
H, K. (1978): Anatomy and taxonomy in Polygonaceae subfam. Polygonoideae Meisn. emend. Jaretzky. Symbolae Bo-
tanicae Upsalienses 22(2): 1–95.
H, J. L.  H, E. L. (1987): A check-list of mycorrhiza in the British flora. New Phytologist, Supplement 105: 1–102.
H, B. (1995): Populationsökologische Untersuchungen an Reynoutria japonica. In: B, R., G, H., K, W.
 S. S-F (Hrsg.), Gebietsfremde Pflanzenarten. Auswirkungen auf einheimische Arten, Lebensgemeinschaen
und Biotope. Kontrollmöglichkeiten und Managment, Ecomed Verlagsgesellscha AG & Co. K. G., Landsberg, pp. 125–140.
H, G. (1981): Polygonum L. In: Illustrierte Flora von Mitteleuropa. Band III. Teil 1. Parey, Berlin - Hamburg, pp. 430–432, 486.
H, R. (1969) Chemotaxonomie der Pflanzen. Band 5. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel und Stuttgart.
H, G., K, F., M, D., P, E.-H.  S, M. (988): Die Wirkung von Auszügen aus dem Sachal-
in-Staudenknöterich, Reynoutria sachalinensis (F. Schmidt) Nakai, gegen Pilzkrankheiten, inbesondere Echte Mehltau-Pilze.
Nachrichtenbl. Deutsch. Pflanzenschutzd. Braunschweig 40: 56–60.
H, T.  T, T. (1984): Soil nitrogen patterns induced by colonisation of Polygonum cuspidatum on Mount Fuji, Japan.
Oecologia 61: 218–223.
H, M. L.  B, J. P. (2000): Evidence for massive clonal growth in the invasive weed Fallopia japonica ( Japa-
nese knotweed). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 133: 463–472.
H, M. L., H, P.M., J, G. I., B, J. P.  F, C. (1998): e use of molecular markers to
study patterns of genotypic diversity in some invasive alien Fallopia spp. (Polygonaceae). Mol. Ecol. 7: 1681–1691.
H, P. (1997): Seasonal dynamics of aerial biomass of Fallopia japonica. In: B, J. H., W, M., P, P.  G, D.
(eds.), Plant invasions: studies from North America and Europe, Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp. 203–206.
H, P.  P, K. (1995): Aerial biomass of Reynoutria japonica and its comparison with that of native species. Preslia (Pra-
ha) 66: 345–348.
H, N.  Ð, L. (1999): Ability of Reynoutria japonica Houtt. (Polygonaceae) accumulate heavy metals. Periodicum Bi-
ologorum 101(3): 233–235.
H K., B I.  K G. (szerk.) (2000): Gyomnövények, gyomirtás, gyombiológia. [Weeds, weed control, weed bi-
ology.] Mezőgazda Kiadó, Budapest. (in Hungarian)
J, E. J. (1995): Die Gesamtareale von Reynoutria japonica Houtt. und R. sachalinensis (F. Schmidt) Nakai, ihre klimatische
Interpretation und Daten zur Ausbreitungsgesichte. Schr.-R. f. Vegetationskde., Sukopp-Festschri, He 27.
J, J.  S, J. (1988): Atlas Florae Europaeae. II. 4. Polygonaceae. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
K, L., K, J., H, R.   G, J. (1997): Clonal plant architectures: a comparative analysis of
form and function. In:  K, H.   G, J. (eds.), e ecology and evolution of clonal plants. Backhuys
Publishers, Leiden, pp. 1–29.
K, S.  G, P. (1991): Zur Soziologie einiger urbaner Neophyten. 2. Beitr. Hercynia (Leipzig) N. F. 28(1): 45–61.
K J. A. (2006): Distribution of invasive alien species stands in Eastern Transylvania. Kanitzia, 14: 109–136.
K, I.  S, H. (1998) Plants invasions in Northern Germany: human perception and response. In: S,
U., E, K., K, I.  W, M. (eds.), Plant invasions: Ecological mechanisms and human responses, Back-
huys Publishers, Leiden, pp. 109–120.
K, K., N, H., S, S.  I, F. (1988): A copper-binding protein in root cytoplasm of Polygonum cuspidatum
growing in a metalliferous habitat. Plant and Cell Physiology 29(6): 1029–1033.
31Fallopia japonica, F. sachalinensis and F. ×bohemica
L  L U (1993): Japanese Knotweed joint research project – hybrid survey. B. S. B. I. news
63: 51–52.
L, W.  S, H. (1992): Agriophyten in der Vegetation Mitteleuropas. Schr.-R. für Vegetationskunde 25: 1–185.
L, J. E.  K, D. H. (1981): Docks and knotweeds of the British Isles. BSBI Handbook No. 3. Botanical Society of the
British Isles, London.
M, B., B, K., P, P., Š, J.  P, I. (2005): Isoenzyme diversity in Reynoutria (Polygonaceae) taxa:
escape from sterility by hybridization. Pl. Syst. Evol. 253: 219–230.
M, B., P, P.  B, K. (2004): History of the invasion and distribution of Reynoutria taxa in the Czech Republic: a
hybrid spreading faster than its parents. Preslia, Praha, 76: 15–64.
M, B., P, P., L, M., S, J., K, A.  B, K. (2003): Variation in DNA-ploidy levels of Reynoutria
taxa in the Czech Republic. Annals of Botany 92: 265–272.
M, G.  P, G. (1998): Phenology, growth and ecophysiological characteristics of Fallopia sachalinensis. Journal of
Vegetation Science 9: 379–386.
M, S., K, H., S, J.  F, A. (1993): Altitudinal variations in germination and growth responses of Rey-
noutria japonica populations on Mt Fuji to a controlled thermal environment. Ecological Research 8: 27–34.
M, B. P. (1989): e Japanese knotweed (Reynoutria japonica Houtt.), ecology and control. Ecological Research 4(3): 81–85.
M, E. (1976): Seedling establishment of Polygonum cuspidatum on Mount Fuji. Japanese Journal of Ecology 26: 101–105.
M, R. S.  D, J. K. s.a., (1978): Polygonaceae (buckwheat family) of New York State. In: M, R. S. (ed.), Con-
tributions to a flora of New York State I. New York State Mus. Bull. No. 431.
M, J. (1996):. Plant ecochemicals which may play important roles in complex interactions between higher plants. FWCA
Book Abstr. p. 161.
M, M. (1958): Pflanzengesellschaen schweizerischen Flußauen. Mitt. schweiz. Anst. forstl. Versuchsw. 34(4): 221–360, (mit
Abbildungen und Tabellen).
M, V. L.B, G. A. (1988): Ecologiya dalnevostochnogo krupnotravya. (Ecology of the Far East tall-herb commu-
nities.) Moscow. (in Russian)
M, L. (1993): Galio-Urticetea. In: M, L., G, G.  E, T. (Hrsg.), Die Pflanzengesellschaen Österre-
ichs. Teil I. Anthropogene Vegetation. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena, pp. 203–251.
M, N.  O, S. (1998): Invasion of alien plants in floodplains – a comparison of Europe and Japan. In: S, U.,
E, K., K, I.  W, M. (eds.), Plant invasions: ecological mechanisms and human responses, Backhuys
Publishers, Leiden, pp. 321–332.
N, T.  T, T. (1988): Responses of dry weight growth under SO2-tolerant plant, Polygonum cuspidatum. Ecological
Research 3: 1–8.
N, M., P, G., Q, B., R, M., S, J., S, O., S, S.  V, M. (1993): Die Farn-
und Blütenpflanzen Baden-Württembergs. Band 1. Hrsg.: S, O., S, S.  P, G. Verlag Eugen Ulmer, Stut-
tgart, pp. 537–540.
N, S.  M, T. (1996): Germination characteristics of two species of Polygonum in relation to their altitudinal
distribution on Mt. Fuji, Japan. Arctic and Alpine Research 28(1): 104–110.
O, T. (1975): Über die Polygonum cuspidatum va r. terminaleCarex doenitzii va r. okuboi-Ass. ass. nov. mit einer Bemerkung
über den Ursprung der speziellen Flora der Izu-Inseln Japans. Bull. Kanagawa Pref. Mus. 8: 91–106.
O, J. (1965): Polygonum L. Tade Zoku. In: Flora of Japan (in English). Smithsonian Institution, Washington, pp. 405–413.
O, E. M, T. (1983): Süddeutsche Pflanzengesellschaen. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart - New York, pp.
P, J. (1994): Jätteörtsamhällena i Nordostasien. (e tall-herb communities in the Far East.) Svensk Bot. Tidskr. (Lund) 88:
P, J. P. (1994): Fallopia japonica (Japanese knotweed) in Wales. In:  W, L. C., C, L. E., W, M.  B, J. H.
(eds.), Ecology and management of invasive riverside plants, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, pp. 159–171.
P, C. H., B, J. P.  F, C. (2003): Further evidence of the role of Dolgellau, Wales, in the production and dispersal
of Japanese knotweed s.l. In: C, L., B, J., B, G., P, K., P, P., W, P. M.  W, M. (eds.),
Plant invasions: Species ecology and ecosystem management, Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp. 197–211.
P, R. (1995): Die Pflanzengesellschaen Deutschlands. II. Auflage. Verlag Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart.
P, E. A. C., G, R., W, G. G.  M, C. (2001): Seasonal patterns of partitioning and remobilization of
14C in the invasive rhizomatous perennial Japanese knotweed (Fallopia japonica /Houtt./ Ronse Decraene). Evolutionary Ecol-
ogy 15(4–6): 347–362.
P S. (): A magyar adventívflóra kutatása. (e research of the Hungarian adventive flora.) Botanikai Közlemények,
84: 25–32. (in Hungarian with English summary)
P, P., B, J. H., B, K., M, B., J, V., K, I., P, J.  Š, J. (2003): Vegetative re-
generation in invasive Reynoutria (Polygonaceae) taxa: the determinant of invasibility at the genotype level. American Journal
of Botany 90(10): 1487–1495.
P, P.  P, K. (1993): Plant invasions and the role of riparian habitats – a comparison of four species alien to central Eu-
rope. Journal of Biogeography 20: 413–420.
P, P.  P, K. 1994. How important are rivers for supporting plant invasions? In:  W, L. C., C, L. E., W, P.
M.  B, J. H. (eds.), Ecology and management of invasive riverside plants, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp. 19–26.
R, C. L., W, R. L., B, J. P., P, R., G, T.M. P (2008): Plasticity in salt tolerance
traits allows for invasion of novel habitat by Japanese knotweed s. l. (Fallopia japonica and F. ×bohemica, Polygonaceae). Ameri-
can Journal of Botany 95(8): 931–942.
R D, L. P.  A, J. R. (1988): Generic limits in Polygonum and related genera (Polygonaceae) on the basis of
floral characters. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 98: 321–371.
32 L. B
S, G. (2001): Beurteilungen von Neophytenausbreitungen aus zoologischer Sicht. In: B, D. (Hrsg.), Adventivpflan-
zen. Braunschweiger Geobotanische Arbeiten 8: 269–285.
S, J.  S, K. J. (1985): Die drei Reynoutria-Sippen (Polygonaceae) des Aachener Stadtwaldes. Gött. Flor. Rundbriefe
19(1): 17–25.
S, J.  S, K. J. (1986a): Nachtrag zu “Die drei Reynoutria-Sippen (Polygonaceae) des Aachener Stadtwaldes”. Gött.
Flor. Rundbriefe 20(1): 77.
S, J.  S, K. J. (1986b): Zur Soziologie der Reynoutria-Sippen (Polygonaceae) im Aachener Stadtwald. Decheniana
(Bonn) 139: 141–147.
S, A., B, J.  H, C. N. (2008): Genotypic and phenotypic variation in a Fallopia ×bohemica population in
north-eastern France. In: T-G B., B J. H., B G., C L., D C. C., P P. (eds.), Plant inva-
sions: Human perception, ecological impacts and management, Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp. 133–144.
S, A.  M, S. (1998): Ecologie et biogeographie de plantes hautement invasives en Europe: Les renouees geantes
du Japon (Fallopia japonica et F. sachalinensis). (Ecology and biogeography of plants which invade Europa: e annoying knot-
weed from Japan /Fallopia japonica and F. sachalinensis/). Revue d’ Ecologie La Terre et la Vie 53(1): 3–39.
S, H.  K, R. (1990): Ökologie und Vergesellschaung von Solidago canadensis et gigantea, Reynoutria japonica et
sachalinense, Impatiens glandulifera, Helianthus tuberosus, Heracleum mantegazzianum. Ihre Verbreitung in Baden-Württem-
berg, sowie Notwendigkeit und Möglichkeiten ihrer Bekämpfung. Ministerium für Umwelt, Baden-Wüerttemberg.
S, H.  K, R. (1991): Neophyten als Problempflanzen im Naturschutz. Arbeitsblätter zum Naturschutz (Karlsruhe)
12: 1–16.
S, A. (1987): Fluß- und bachbegleitende Pflanzengesellschaen und Vegetationskomplexe im Schwarzwald. Disserta-
tiones Botanicae 102: 1–368 + Anhang.
S, L. A. (1997): e status of Fallopia japonica (Reynoutria japonica; Polygonum cuspidatum) in North America. In: B,
J. H., W, M., P, P.  G, D. (eds.), Plant invasions: studies from North America and Europe, Backhuys Publishers,
Leiden, pp. 95–102.
S, L. A.  M, H. C. (1997): Mechanical control of Japanese knotweed (Fallopia japonica [Houtt.] Ronse Decraene):
Effects of cutting regime on rhizomatous reserves. Natural Areas Journal 17(4): 341–345.
S, T. J.  B, B. (2007): An evaluation of mechanisms preventing growth and survival of two native species in invasive
Bohemian knotweed (Fallopia ×bohemica, Polygonaceae). American Journal of Botany 94(5): 776–783.
S, J. M. D., W, J. P., C, L. E.  O, M. R. (2008): Modelling the spatial spread of Fallopia japonica on a local scale
in the United Kingdom. In: T-G B., B J. H., B G., C L., D C. C., P P. (eds.), Plant in-
vasions: Human perception, ecological impacts and management, Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp. 145–160.
S R. (1927): Verschiedene Adventivpflanzen in Ungarn. In: Beiträge zu einer kritischen Adventivflora des historischen Un-
garns. Botanisches Archiv, Zeitschri für die gesamte Botanik (Königsberg) 19: 357–359.
S R. (1970, 1980): A magyar flóra és vegetáció rendszertani-növényföldrajzi kézikönyve. (Synopsis systematico-geobotanica
florae vegetationisque Hungariae.) IV, VI. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest. (in Hungarian)
S, A. N. (1930): e Polygonaceae of Eastern Asia. Contrib. Gray Herb. Harvard Univ. 88: 1–129.
S, W. A.  R, T. (1992): Plant virus inhibitors from members of the Polygonaceae. Biomedical Letters 47(187):
S, H. (1962): Neophyten in natürlichen Pflanzengesellschaen Mitteleuropas. Ber. deutsch. bot. Ges. 75: 193–205.
S, H.  S, B. (1991): Zur Biologie neophytischer Reynoutria-Arten in Mitteleuropa. I. Über Floral- und Extrafloral-
nektarien. Verh. Bot. Ver. Berlin Brandenburg (Berlin) 124: 31–42.
S, H.  S, B. (1992): Zur Biologie neophytischer Reynoutria-Arten in Mitteleuropa. III. Morphometrie der Laubblät-
ter. Natur und Landscha 67(10): 503–505.
S, H.  S, B. (1993): Zur Biologie neophytischer Reynoutria-Arten in Mitteleuropa. II. Morphometrie der Sproßsys-
teme. Dissertationes Botanicae, Festschri Zoller 196: 163–174.
S, H.  S, U. (1995): Reynoutria sachalinensis in Europe and in the Far East: a comparison of the species ecol-
ogy inj its native and adventive distribution range. In: P, P., P, K., R, M.  W, M. (eds.), Plant invasions.
General aspects and special problems, SPB Academic Publishing, Amsterdam, pp. 151–159.
S, H.  S, U. (1988): Reynoutria japonica Houtt. in Japan und in Europa. Veröff. Geobot. Inst. ETH, Stiung Rübel
(Zürich) 98: 354–372.
S, J. (1994): Growth dynamics of shoot height and foliage structure of a rhizomatous perennial herb, Polygonum cuspida-
tum. Annals of Botany 73: 629–638.
S, L. Gy. (1997): Allelopathy – phytochemical potential – life strategy. JPTE, Pécs.
T, M.-S., V, S., S, L.  M, G. (2007): Hybridization and sexual reproduction in the invasive alien Fal-
lopia (Polygonaceae) complex in Belgium. American Journal of Botany 99(1): 193–203.
V, L. (1919): Polygonum cuspidatum Siebold et Zucc. Ein Studienversuch zur Pflanzenbiologie. Ber. Natw. Verein Augsburg
42: 175–183.
W, P. M. (1997): Predicting plant invasions: making a start. In: B, J. H., W, M., P, P.  G, D. (eds.), Plant
invasions: Studies from North America and Europe, Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp. 1–18.
W, D. A. (1993): Reynoutria Houtt. In: T, T. G., H, V. H., B, N. A., M, D. M., V, D. H., W-
, S. M.  W, D. A. (eds.), Flora Europaea, Volume 1. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, p. 98.
W, E. (2003): Invasive plant species of the world: a reference guide to environmental weeds. CAB International Publishing,
W, L. A., B, J. N.  DT, A. (2005): A review of the biology and ecology of three invasive perennials in New
York State: Japanese knotweed (Polygonum cuspidatum), mugwort (Artemisia vulgaris) and pale swallow-wort (Vincetoxicum
rossicum). Plant and Soil 277: 53–69.
W, S. G., H, P. E.  H, B. (1997): Habitat suitability and the distribution of alien weeds of riparian ecosystems. In:
C, A.  P, J. (eds.), Species dispersal and land use processes. Proc. 6th ann. conf. of IALE (UK), Ulster, pp. 37–44.
33Fallopia japonica, F. sachalinensis and F. ×bohemica
Y, O. G.  M, S. L. / Яворська, О. Г. Мосякін, С. Л. (2001): Aдвентивна фракція синантропної флори
київської агломерації. (e nonnative fraction of the urban flora of the Kiev Region.) Naukovi Zapysky NaUKMA, Biologiya
i Ekologiya 19: 55-68. (in Ukrainian)
Z, P. F.  J, A. F. (2003): An overlooked hybrid Japanese knotweed (Polygonum cuspidatum × sachalinense; Polygo-
naceae) in North America. Rhodora 105: 143–152.
Z, K.  T, W. (1991a): Herbivore Insect Community in a Reynoutria (Polygonaceae) Hybrid Zone in Central Eu-
rope. Proceedings of the 4th ECE/XIII. SIEEC, Gödöllő, pp. 607–609.
Z, K.  T, W. (1991b): Anpassungserscheinungen von Insekten an Neophyten der Gattung Reynoutria (Polygo-
naceae) in Zentraleuropa. Zool. Jb. Syst. 118: 377–390.
Web reference
JKLIST: JAPANESE-KNOTWEED JISCmail list (e Japanese Knotweed Forum).
... Today, they pose a great economic and environmental threat as they cause loss of native biodiversity, affect agriculture and forestry, and they also endanger certain animal species [2,3]. Invasive knotweeds thrive alongside water bodies and their banks, and can raise problems with water quality, accessibility, and flow rate [3,4]. These plants are also found in urban areas, on roads and railways, where they cause significant structural damage to pavements, buildings, and traffic infrastructure [4]. ...
... Invasive knotweeds thrive alongside water bodies and their banks, and can raise problems with water quality, accessibility, and flow rate [3,4]. These plants are also found in urban areas, on roads and railways, where they cause significant structural damage to pavements, buildings, and traffic infrastructure [4]. Bohemian knotweed is known to be more vigorous and persistent than its parents and is one of the most invasive plants in Europe [4]. ...
... These plants are also found in urban areas, on roads and railways, where they cause significant structural damage to pavements, buildings, and traffic infrastructure [4]. Bohemian knotweed is known to be more vigorous and persistent than its parents and is one of the most invasive plants in Europe [4]. ...
Full-text available
Japanese knotweed (Fallopia japonica Houtt.) and Bohemian knotweed (Fallopia x bohemica) are invasive alien plant species, causing great global ecological and economic damage. Mechanical excavation of plant material represents an effective containment method, but it is not economically and environmentally sustainable as it produces an excessive amount of waste. Thus, practical uses of these plants are actively being sought. In this study, we explored the carotenoid profiles and carotenoid content of mature (green) and senescing leaves of both knotweeds. Both plants showed similar pigment profiles. By means of high performance thin-layer chromatography with densitometry and high performance liquid chromatography coupled to photodiode array and mass spectrometric detector, 11 carotenoids (and their derivatives) and 4 chlorophylls were identified in green leaves, whereas 16 distinct carotenoids (free carotenoids and xanthophyll esters) were found in senescing leaves. Total carotenoid content in green leaves of Japanese knotweed and Bohemian knotweed (378 and 260 mg of lutein equivalent (LE)/100 g dry weight (DW), respectively) was comparable to that of spinach (384 mg LE/100 g DW), a well-known rich source of carotenoids. A much lower total carotenoid content was found for senescing leaves of Japanese and Bohemian knotweed (67 and 70 mg LE/100 g DW, respectively). Thus, green leaves of both studied knotweeds represent a rich and sustainable natural source of bioactive carotenoids. Exploitation of these invaders for the production of high value-added products should consequently promote their mechanical control.
... A Kárpát-medencéből először 1923-ban jelezték elvadulását, jelenleg minden országában jelen van. Európán kívül özönnövény Észak-Amerika területén (Mexikóban nem) és Új-Zélandon (Hollingsworth és Bailey 2000, Balogh 2008). A F. japonica magyarországi előfordulásáról az 1920-as évektől vannak adatok, a 20. ...
... A F. sachalinensis hazai jelenlétének ismerete is félreismert példányokon nyugodott, korábbi adatai minden bizonnyal az akkor még le nem írt-számos bélyegében hasonló-hibridfajra vonatkozhattak. Magyarországon a legutóbbi időkig csak botanikus kerti jelenléte volt biztos ( Balogh 2008). Napjainkban három bizonyított előfordulása van, kettő erdei ruderális élőhelyen ( Gerecse 2006, Vendvidék 2010), egy pedig Baranya megyében, patak menti, zavart élőhelyen, amelyet terepi munkánk során fedeztünk fel 2012-ben. ...
... A Fallopia sachalinensis száráról és leveléről jelzett néhány szaprotróf gomba a tömlős-és konídiumos gombák közé tartozik. A Fallopia ×bohemica esetében nincs erre vonatkozó adat ( Beerling et al. 1994, Balogh 2004, 2008). ...
... Fallopia compacta is reported from its whole adventive range (Europe, North America, Australia, New Zealand) as a rare plant, with no or minimal invasiveness (Conolly 2001, Bailey 2003, Desjardins et al. 2022. In Europe, it has thus far been found in several countries, such as the United Kingdom, Ireland, Belgium, Netherlands, Germany, and the Czech Republic (Hlaváček et al. 1996, Bailey et al. 1996, Hollingsworth & Bailey 2000, Tiébré et al. 2007a, Balogh 2008, Galasso et al. 2009, Alberternst & Böhmer 2011, Duistermaat et al. 2012, Stace & Crawley 2015. In contrast, F. sachalinensis is considered a dangerous invasive plant in many European countries (e.g., the United Kingdom, Belgium, Germany, Czech Republic, Poland, Slovakia), even though the number of its stands is significantly lower on the continent than those of F. japonica var. ...
A new knotweed hybrid originating from the crossing of Fallopia compacta and F. sachalinensis is described based on plant material collected in the Moravia region in the Czech Republic as F. ×moravica. In addition to the Czech Republic, the hybrid has also been reported previously from the United Kingdom and New Zealand; however, it was not distinguished from F. ×bohemica, a hybrid between F. japonica and F. sachalinensis, since its one parent (F. compacta) has been generally treated only as a variety of F. japonica. F. ×moravica differs from the morphologically most similar hexaploid (2n = 6x = 66) F. ×bohemica by its tetraploid (2n = 4x = 44) number of chromosomes and by the constant absence of purple spots on stem internodes (which are usually present in F. ×bohemica). The new hybrid also differs from F. ×bohemica as well as other European Fallopia members by its unique relative genome size. Other potential morphological and cytological differences of F. ×moravica from the related F. ×bohemica are discussed.
... Furthermore, Fallopia's rhizome system grows rampantly and the plants remove intensively the nutrients from the soil, thus taking over the ground from their competitors. Taken together, all these factors result in an almost 100 % inhibition of germination and growth of co-occurring species (Balogh 2008 (Petrova & al. 2013b). This is its first report for the Sredna Gora floristic region. ...
Full-text available
New chorological data for Bulgarian flora are presented for Dittrichia graveolens (L.) Greuter (Balkan Range, eastern), Hornungia petraea (L.) Rchb. (West Frontier Mts, Mt Vlahina), Spergula pentandra L. (Northern Black Sea Coast), Euphorbia palustris L. (Northern Black Sea Coast), Onobrychis viciifolia Scop. (Northern Black Sea Coast), Centaurium maritimum (L.) R.M. Fritsch (Eastern Rhodopi Mts) and Kickxia commutata subsp. graeca (Bory & Chaub.) R. Fern. (Eastern Rhodopi Mts).
... Furthermore, Fallopia's rhizome system grows rampantly and the plants remove intensively the nutrients from the soil, thus taking over the ground from their competitors. Taken together, all these factors result in an almost 100 % inhibition of germination and growth of co-occurring species (Balogh 2008 (Petrova & al. 2013b). This is its first report for the Sredna Gora floristic region. ...
Full-text available
New records for the vascular flora of Inousse (Oinousses) and Lipsi are provided. These islands belong respectively to the Inousses and Lipsi islets groups. The islets have been studied between 1989 and 1990 for Inousses (Panitsa & al. 1994) and from 1990 to 1995 for Lipsi (Panitsa & Tzanoudakis 2001). Inousses comprises six islets situated east of Chios Island (Nomos and Eparchia Chiou in floristic region East Aegean islands) and 270 taxa have been recorded for this complex: Inousse (the main island with an area of ca. 14 km²), Panaghia, Vatos, Pontikos, Vatopoula and Archontoniso. Lipsi is a group of 25 islets situated between the islands of Samos, Patmos and Leros (Nomos Dodekanisou, Eparchia Kalimnou, East Aegean islands). The largest island is Lipsi with a floristic count of 471 taxa. The first author (CC) visited Inousse between 11‒18 May 2018 (48 new records belonging to 27 families) and the main island of Lipsi between 21‒26 May 2018 (16 new records belonging to 12 families).
... Furthermore, Fallopia's rhizome system grows rampantly and the plants remove intensively the nutrients from the soil, thus taking over the ground from their competitors. Taken together, all these factors result in an almost 100 % inhibition of germination and growth of co-occurring species (Balogh 2008 (Petrova & al. 2013b). This is its first report for the Sredna Gora floristic region. ...
... Furthermore, Fallopia's rhizome system grows rampantly and the plants remove intensively the nutrients from the soil, thus taking over the ground from their competitors. Taken together, all these factors result in an almost 100 % inhibition of germination and growth of co-occurring species (Balogh 2008 (Petrova & al. 2013b). This is its first report for the Sredna Gora floristic region. ...
Full-text available
New records for the vascular flora of Inousse (Oinousses) Lipsi and Ikaria are provided.
... Furthermore, Fallopia's rhizome system grows rampantly and the plants remove intensively the nutrients from the soil, thus taking over the ground from their competitors. Taken together, all these factors result in an almost 100 % inhibition of germination and growth of co-occurring species (Balogh 2008 (Petrova & al. 2013b). This is its first report for the Sredna Gora floristic region. ...
Full-text available
New chorological data are presented for 401 species and subspecies from Bulgaria (15-18, 130-148, 184-205, 390-392, 398-401), Greece (1-3, 19-129, 149-183, 206-389, 393-397), and Turkey-in-Europe (4-14). The taxa belong to the following families: Acanthaceae (149), Aceraceae (55, 242), Aizoaceae (150), Alliaceae (17, 46, 47, 120, 378, 379), Amaranthaceae (56, 61, 62), Amaryllidaceae (180), Anacardiaceae (243), Apiaceae (15, 20, 21, 63-67, 142, 151-153, 187, 206, 244-252, 393), Apocynaceae (253, 254), Araceae (48), Aristolochiaceae (255), Asclepiadaceae (68, 154), Asparagaceae (380), Asphodelaceae (381), Asteraceae (4-8, 22-25, 57, 69-79, 130-132, 155-158, 188, 199, 207-212, 256-277, 394), Balsaminaceae (133, 134, 189), Berberidaceae (190), Boraginaceae (9, 10, 26, 80, 159-161, 278), Brassicaceae (27, 28, 81, 82, 143, 162-164, 200, 279-282), Buddlejaceae (135, 191, 213), Cactaceae (83, 124, 197, 283), Caesalpiniaceae (284), Campanulaceae (29, 30, 285-287), Caprifoliaceae (84, 288, 289), Caryophyllaceae (1, 31, 85, 165, 166, 201, 214-216, 290-294), Ceratophyllaceae (217), Chenopodiaceae (2, 32, 86-88, 136, 167, 168, 218), Colchicaceae (18), Convolvulaceae (11, 16, 33, 34, 89, 219, 295-297), Crassulaceae (125, 298), Cucurbitaceae (35, 90, 299), Cyperaceae (49), Dennstaedtiaceae (241), Dipsacaceae (91, 300-303), Dioscoreaceae (382), Ericaceae (92), Euphorbiaceae (36, 58, 59, 93, 94, 169, 192, 193, 202, 304-306), Fabaceae (95, 96, 137-139, 170, 171, 194, 203, 307-323, 395), Frankeniaceae (97), Gentianaceae (37, 98, 99, 204, 324), Geraniaceae (325), Hyacinthaceae (181), Hydrophyllaceae (100), Hypericaceae (101, 326), Iridaceae (129, 182, 198), Juncaceae (50, 183, 233), Lamiaceae (38, 102, 144, 172, 220-223, 327-334), Liliaceae s.l. (51, 147), Linaceae (103, 104, 145, 335), Lythraceae (39, 105), Malvaceae (106, 107, 224, 225, 336), Moraceae (337-339), Nyctaginaceae (340), Oleaceae (341, 342), Onagraceae (40, 226-228), Orchidaceae (148, 184, 185, 390-392, 398-401), Orobanchaceae (41, 108, 109, 173, 174, 343, 344, 396), Oxalidaceae (42, 345, 346), Papaveraceae (110), Phytolaccaceae (348), Pinaceae (186, 196), Platanaceae (347), Plumbaginaceae (111, 126, 349), Poaceae (52-54, 121-123, 234-240, 383-388), Polygalaceae (350), Polygonaceae (43, 60, 140, 229, 351, 352), Primulaceae (353), Pteridaceae (19), Rafflesiaceae (175), Ranunculaceae (44, 45, 176, 177, 230, 354-356), Resedaceae (357), Rosaceae (127, 358-360), Rubiaceae (146, 231, 361-363, 397), Rutaceae (112), Salicaceae (364), Sapindaceae (141), Saxifragaceae (178), Scrophulariaceae s.l. (12-14, 113, 128, 205, 365, 366), Smilacaceae (389), Solanaceae (3, 114, 179, 367, 368), Tiliaceae (369), Ulmaceae (370), Urticaceae (115, 116, 371), Valerianaceae (372, 373), Verbenaceae (117, 374, 375), Veronicaceae (118, 232, 376, 377), Vitaceae (195), and Zygophyllaceae (119). N ew species for countries are: Bulgaria – Anacamptis coriophora × A. morio (390), Gymnadenia conopsea s.l. × G. rhellicani (391), Neotinea ×dietrichiana (184, 401), Greece – Buddleja davidii (213), Euphorbia humifusa (36). Th e publication includes contributions by: E. Axiotis, M. Axiotis & Kit Tan (1-3), M. Aybeke (4-14), Zh. Barzov & A. Petrova (15-18), B. Biel & Kit Tan (19-54), C. Cattaneo & M. Grano (55-60), C. Cattaneo & M. Panitsa (61-123), K. Giannopolous, Kit Tan & G. Vold (124-129), P. Glogov, M. Georgieva & D. Pavlova (130-141), P. Glogov & D. Pavlova (142-147), I. Hristov, M. Yordanova, A. Petrova & A. Kurteva (148), R. Marchant, Kit Tan & A. Strid (149-183), A. Petrova, R. Bukova & P. Dimitrov (184), A. Petrova, R. Varbanov & A. Shishkova (185), A. Petrova, D. Venkova, I. Gerasimova & R. Vassilev (186-195), Ts. Raycheva & K. Stoyanov (196-198), S. Stoyanov, V. Goranova & Zh. Barzov (199-205), A. Strid (206-240), Kit Tan & G. Vold (241-389), V. Vladimirov, S. Bancheva & M. Delcheva (390-391), V. Vladimirov & Z. Szeląg (392), G. Zarkos, V. Christodoulou, Kit Tan & G. Vold (393-397) , I. Kostadinov, S. Dalakchieva & K. Popov (398-401).
Full-text available
Background: Invasive species are a major threat to biodiversity, human health, and economies worldwide. The cost of the damages and the fight against them exceeds 9.6–12.7 billion euros annually for European Union. The Pannonic open sand grasslands represent important endemic habitats in European Union and are threatened by the spread of several invasive plant species. Among them, the common milkweed Asclepias syriaca L. has already transformed large areas of natural vegetation and endangered the others. The need for management of alien plants is urgent in both agricultural and protected areas. Herbicide treatment may be a cost-effective method for controlling the extended stand of milkweed even in protected areas. Therefore, this study monitored the herbicide treatment effects on A. syriaca before, during, and after treatment in a strictly protected UNESCO biosphere reserve near Fülöpháza from 2011 to 2017. The entire stand was treated with glyphosate in May 2014. We used simple data processing methods to follow the fate of individual shoots. Results: The 7-year data showed that treatment was successful for a short term (the year of treatment and the following year). The number of A. syriaca shoots in the stand decreased following herbicide treatment, with 73% of the shoots dying. In the first year after treatment, the number of shoots decreased continuously as herbicides were translocated by rhizomatic roots, thereby damaging dormant bud banks. Conclusions: The surviving buds adjusted to the number of emerging shoots in the years after treatment, and growth of the milkweed stand appeared to show a slow regeneration for a longer-term period. We concluded that the successful control of A. syriaca after herbicide treatment depends on continuous management (e.g., further point spraying) of treated areas to suppress possible regrowth during subsequent seasons. Therefore, periodic control is highly recommended because one-time treatment is insufficient.
Full-text available
The aim of this work was to determine two types of photosynthetic water-use efficiency in order to examine their utility as selection criteria for tolerance of energy crops to soil water deficit. Furthermore, effects of crop cultivation on soil water content and storage were investigated. Seven energy crops were examined: miscanthus, prairie cordgrass, willow, thornfree rose, Virginia mallow, Bohemian knotweed, and topinambour. The highest values of instantaneous (WUE) and intrinsic (WUEi) water-use efficiencies were found for miscanthus and prairie cordgrass. The reduction of WUE and/or WUEi was caused mainly by a rapid rise in the transpiration rate and a greater stomatal conductance, respectively. Principal component analysis showed that neither WUE nor WUEi could be recommended as universal selection criteria for the drought tolerance in different energy crops. The proper localization of soil with a good supply of water is most the important condition for energy crop plantations.
Full-text available
Stands of Fallopia ×bohemica (an adventive East-Asian element of the Hungarian flora) were investigated from coenological point of view in the south-western part of Vas County. We have those plant associations that were found neighbouring and threatened by the invasive (hybrid) Japanese knotweed stands recorded. The paper also informs about a transect method as well as the experiences derived from its use. The transect included the neighbouring association (“a”), the overlapping zone (“b”) and the Fallopia-stand (“c”). The aim of this method was to prove the extent of overlapping of these vegetation types and of species diversity loss.
Full-text available
During the last decade the author has investigated the spreading populations of invasive plant species threatening the natural vegetation of Western Hungary. Populations of the taxa belonging to the Reynoutria section of the Fallopia genus, play one of the most important role in this process. On the basis of exomorphological observations, the results indicate that – similarly to occurrences reported in other countries of Europe – Fallopia ×bohemica hybrid taxon exists in Hungary. (in Hungarian with English summary)
Full-text available
The distribution of four alien Reynoutria taxa (R. japonica var. japonica, R. japonica var. compacta, R. sachalinensis and R. x bohemica), native to East Asia, and history of their introduction to and spread in the Czech Republic was studied. The most widely distributed representative of the genus, R. japonica var. japonica, was first recorded in 1883 by A. Weidmann in cultivation in S Bohemia. The first record outside cultivation is from N Bohemia in 1902. Up to 2000, it has been recorded in 1335 localities, most frequently in riparian and human-made habitats. The dwarf variety R. japonica var. compacta is of a limited distribution that depends on rare cultivation and subsequent escape. The first herbarium specimen was collected in 1948 and the first record out of cultivation is from 1995. R. sachalinensis was recorded in 261 localities. It was first collected in 1921 in Central Bohemia. A herbarium specimen of a plant cultivated in the Botanical Garden of the Charles University in Prague, collected in 1950, has been re-determined as R. x bohemica, the hybrid between R. japonica var. japonica and R. sachalinensis, and represents the earliest record of the hybrid in the Czech Republic. Since then, this taxon was observed in 381 localities. Herbarium records were used to compare the rate of spread among the three common taxa in 1952-1995, i.e. since when the hybrid started to appear in herbaria. R. japonica var. japonica has been spreading significantly faster than R. sachalinensis and the hybrid exhibits twice the rate of invasion of its parents.
Full-text available
The spatial distribution and abundance of some important invasive plant species have been surveyed in the Őrség Landscape Protection Area (ŐLPA) in Western Hungary, situated in the former “Iron Curtain Zone”. During field studies performed within “The Natural History of Őrség” research program, high values of invasion of the natural or seminatural habitats were found. Despite the fact that the area was ”undisturbed” for decades, these values are similar to other parts of Western Hungary. The main aim was to investigate the role invasive alien plants play in the transformation of the original vegetation. 75 % of the 24 spreading species recorded in the region of the ŐLPA are invasive aliens. 66 % of the latter are of North American origin and 50% of them belong to the family Asteraceae. The invasive alien plants that most endanger the natural habitats of the region are: Solidago gigantea, Fallopia x bohemica, Helianthus tuberosus agg., Impatiens glandulifera, Aster lanceolatus agg. The range of these and other alien invasive taxa were studied in detail on maps with a 2.5 x 2.5 km UTM grid. Plant communities invaded by these plant species were also recorded. In addition, the small-scale and slow expansion of a few native species is also demonstrable (e. g. Calamagrostis epigeios, Sambucus ebulus, Urtica dioica).
Japanese knotweed is an invasive perennial, introduced into the UK in 1850. The plant is now established throughout the waterways and derelict land. This paper looks at its biomass production abilities. Two sites were sampled in the autumn of 1991: Loughborough, horticultural landscape scheme (A); and River Tawe floodplain (B). The following procedure was followed: three randomly located 1.0 m² quadrats were sampled; the number of stems and overall height were recorded; standing crop was harvested to a height of 2cm above the ground; root and rhizome biomass was also estimated. Aerial biomass at site A and site B were 6037kg/ha and 12963kg/ha, respectively. Belowground biomass was greatest at 10-25cm depth at both sites, the value being 16 000kg/ha. Combined biomass values were approximately 24 000kg/ha. -S.R.Harris