Article

A comparative study of architectural discourse in Western and Arab-Islamic thought

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the author.

Abstract

This paper aims at comparing the essence of architectural discourse in Western and Arab-Islamic thought. It starts by arguing the problematic challenges that have faced intellectuals when defining architecture from the viewpoints of theory and practice. This leads to a discussion of the current contemporary Western architectural discourse which is found to be of a dual nature: the prescriptive and the operational. This is followed by a parallel analysis of contemporary Arab-Islamic architectural discourse which is also found to take two strands: a contemplative and a productive one. Western and Arab-Islamic values of aesthetics are also briefly compared and are found to conform to the argument put forth in the paper. Finally, the paper concludes that contemporary Arab-Islamic architecture discourse is found to lack a comprehensive theory of architecture that is capable of implementation. Its problematics resemble to a great extent those of Western architectural discourse, but its nature is different due to its specific Islamic communal framework.

No full-text available

Request Full-text Paper PDF

To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the author.

ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.