Content uploaded by Shantanu Kundu
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Shantanu Kundu on May 01, 2024
Content may be subject to copyright.
Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at
http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=imdn21
Download by: [New York University] Date: 05 March 2016, At: 11:10
Mitochondrial DNA Part A
DNA Mapping, Sequencing, and Analysis
ISSN: 2470-1394 (Print) 2470-1408 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/imdn21
DNA barcoding of Gobiid fishes (Perciformes:
Gobiidae) from eastern and northeastern India
with new record of a Gobionellinae species for the
region
Boni Amin Laskar, Vikas Kumar, Shantanu Kundu, Kaomud Tyagi, Devkant
Singha, Rajasree Chakraborty, Sumantika Chatterjee & Soumitra Saha
To cite this article: Boni Amin Laskar, Vikas Kumar, Shantanu Kundu, Kaomud Tyagi, Devkant
Singha, Rajasree Chakraborty, Sumantika Chatterjee & Soumitra Saha (2016): DNA barcoding of
Gobiid fishes (Perciformes: Gobiidae) from eastern and northeastern India with new record of
a Gobionellinae species for the region, Mitochondrial DNA Part A
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/24701394.2016.1143470
Published online: 25 Feb 2016.
Submit your article to this journal
Article views: 10
View related articles
View Crossmark data
MITOCHONDRIAL DNA, 2016
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/24701394.2016.1143470
SHORT COMMUNICATION
DNA barcoding of Gobiid fishes (Perciformes: Gobiidae) from eastern and
northeastern India with new record of a Gobionellinae species for the region
Boni Amin Laskar, Vikas Kumar, Shantanu Kundu, Kaomud Tyagi, Devkant Singha, Rajasree Chakraborty,
Sumantika Chatterjee and Soumitra Saha
Centre for DNA Taxonomy, Molecular Systematics Division, Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata, India
ABSTRACT
The study attempted identification of Gobiid fishes from freshwaters in the east and northeast India
on a collection of 20 specimens. The DNA barcode data delineated the collected samples into three
species clades in the neighbor-joining tree. The results confirmed the identification of five sample
sequences belonging to the subfamily Gobionellinae due to cohesive cladding with Awaous
congeners. This is a new subfamily record for the northeastern region. Another 15 sample
sequences showed conspecific cladding with Glossogobius giuris in the database. Among the 15
sample sequences, 14 sequences cladded with G. giuris sequences of Indian specimens while one
sample sequence cladded with G. giuris sequences of South African specimens. This indicated the
presence of either a hidden species or a previously synonymized species in the G. giuris complex.
ARTICLE HISTORY
Received 13 October 2015
Revised 4 January 2016
Accepted 14 January 2016
Published online
15 February 2016
KEYWORDS
Awaous; Chindwin basin;
Glossogobius; Goby fish;
Kaladan basin; mitochondrial
COI
Introduction
The family Gobiidae of the order Perciformes (Class:
Actinopterygii) is the most speciose of marine fishes and is
also well represented in brackish and freshwater habitats
(Mohlmann & Randall 2002) with nearly 2000 extant species
currently recognized (Agorreta et al. 2013; Viswambharan et al.
2015). Gobiid fishes are mainly characterized by having ventral
fins united into one below the pectorals (Hamilton 1822). The
classification of the family gobiidae has been revised from time
to time with the evidence from molecular data. The phylogen-
etic assessment also includes the discovery of many new
species in the family (Agorreta et al. 2013). At the present time,
there are as many as 34 species of gobiid fishes inhabiting in
Indian region including marine, estuaries, deltas, freshwater
and islands (Froese & Pauly 2015).
Hamilton (1822) had classified 12 species of the genus
Gobius from the Ganga drainage in eastern India that are
currently classified into three subfamilies, viz., Oxudercinae
(seven species), Gobiinae (one species) and Gobionellinae
(three species) (Eschmeyer 2015). Hamilton could survey very
limited areas of the northeastern India. As of late, McClelland
(1839) surveyed the northeastern region and followed by other
workers during the last three decades. At the present time,
Glossogobius giuris (Hamilton 1822) belonging to the subfamily
Goniinae is the only freshwater fish species of the family
Gobiidae recorded from the entire northeastern India (Goswami
et al. 2012). This species is primarily freshwater living but often
migrates to sea due to the amphidromous nature. However, in
the taxonomic history, a gobius of Hamilton’s description viz.,
Gobius gutum has been synonymized with Gobius (current
name Glossogobius)giuris (Kottelat 2013). Hamilton recorded
that G. giuris grows to large size and attains a length of almost a
foot while compared to G. gutum. Thus, it appears that the
synonymy of G. gutum and G. giuris is uncertain. The northeast
India represents a vast locality comprising of three principal
river basins, viz., the Brahmaputra, the Barak and the Kaladan.
Hitherto, no specific survey targeting the gobiid fishes inhabit-
ing in the freshwater ecosystems in northeast India is available.
We investigated the freshwater gobiid fishes inhabiting across
the major river systems in the eastern and northeastern India to
understand the diversity of gobiids as well as the genetic
variations among the population in distant river basins
extending from Chindwin to Ganga. We employed the widely
used DNA barcoding technique for species level identification
that has emerged as a powerful tool in the inventorying of
earth’s biota (Hebert et al. 2003). The technique complements
the traditional taxonomy in identifying taxa by quickly
comparing with the global database. Thereby, the technique
allows easy and fastest insight in differentiating taxa bearing
indiscernible morphological differences. We utilized the agreed
upon barcode segment of cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1
mitochondrial region (mtCOI) to assess the species composition
and genetic diversity within the family Gobiidae from the east
and northeast India.
Materials and methods
Fish specimens were collected from rivers flowing into the
Indian territory of the Chindwin basin, the Ganga basin and the
Kaladan basin and were identified following the recognized
morphological descriptions (Talwar & Jhingran 1991).
CONTACT Vikas Kumar vikaszsi77@gmail.com Centre for DNA Taxonomy, Molecular Systematics Division, Zoological Survey of India (ZSI), Kolkata 700053, India
ß2016 Taylor & Francis
Downloaded by [New York University] at 11:10 05 March 2016
The sampling was done from outside of any protected area
jurisdiction, hence no sampling regulation exists. Fishes were
tagged with sampling ID to preserve in 70% ethyl alcohol for
downstream morphological and molecular studies. DNA extrac-
tion, PCR amplification and purification of PCR products were
performed as per our previous studies (Laskar et al. 2013).
Sequencing was performed bi-directionally at Zoological
Survey of India’s in-house sequencing facility (Kundu et al.
2015).
The homology search was done using Basic Local Alignment
Search Tool search in GenBank database. Some of the
congeneric and conspecific sequences of the same or related
taxa were retrieved from NCBI database and aligned theme
with the sample sequences by using the Clustal X program
(Thompson et al. 1997). The mean genetic divergences were
calculated using Kimura 2 parameter (K2P) in MEGA6.0 (Tamura
et al. 2013). Cladistic analysis was performed on K2P parameter
under the optimality criteria of neighbor-joining (NJ) by using
MEGA6.0 with 1000 bootstrap support. Accession numbers, as
well as the respective voucher numbers of the sequences used
in the dataset, are available in the phylogenetic tree where the
sample sequences are marked.
Results and discussion
Based on the DNA barcode data, our sample sequences
showed the closest similarity with the database sequences of
the species within the family Gobiidae. It is important to note
here that the northeast India is reported to be inhabited by
only single species (G. giuris) within the family Gobiidae
(Goswami et al. 2012). However, our sample sequences
formed three distinct species clades due to 18.7–26.3% K2P
genetic distance among them (Table 1). A clade of five sample
sequences (accession number KT364554–KT364558) having
0.02% within group K2P distance showed highest similarity
(93%) with Awaous congeners. The K2P distance of these five
sample sequences with the Awaous congeners were from 9.9%
to 12% (Table 1). The genus Awaous belongs to the subfamily
Gobionellinae of the family Gobiidae. Thus, the identification of
these five sample sequences was confirmative up to sub
familial level only. Phylogenetic tree constructed by Barcode of
Life Database (BOLD) workbench revealed cladding of these
five sample sequences within the congeneric clade of Awaous
while the genus Stiphodon positioned as the out-group. The
genus Stiphodon also belongs to the order Perciformes of
family Gobiidae and subfamily Gobionellinae. The partial mtCOI
data of sample sequences (n¼5) from Kaladan river basin
showed congeneric cladding with Awaous aneofuscus and
Awaous ocellaris in NJ tree (Figure 1). At the stage, in the
absence of DNA barcode data on all the extant species of the
subfamily Gobionellinae, the identification of our sample
sequences was inconclusive beyond subfamily level. The
study evidenced the existence of a Gobionellinae species in
the freshwater in northeast India which is a new record of the
subfamily for the region. The Gobionellinae fish specimens
were collected from the Kaladan drainage in south Mizoram
that flows into the Bay of Bengal through Myanmar. The
Kaladan basin is less explored for fish species composition as
compared to other drainages in northeast India. Nevertheless,
the identification of the Gobionellinae fish up to species level is
urgent and requires further sampling.
Another 15 sample sequences showed highest similarity
(99%) with G. giuris in the database. In the database, there are,
however, two sets of sequences being tagged by the same
name (G. giuris). A set of G. giuris from India and another set of
G. giuris from South Africa. Among the sample sequences of G.
giuris, one sequence (voucher no. ZSI G189, accession number
KT364543) collected from river Ganges showed only 1.4%
genetic divergence with the South African sequences of G.
giuris. The South African clade of G. giuris showed 0.02%
intraspecific genetic divergence. The sequences of Indian clade
of G. giuris in the database along with the 14 sample sequences
(accession number KT364539–KT364542, KT364544–KT364553)
from Chindwin and Ganga basin were conspecific due to low
nucleotide divergence of maximum 0.08% within group K2P
distance while they were distinct from the South African clade
of G. giuris by 12.3–13.1% K2P genetic distance (Table 1). The
interspecific genetic distance between Glossogobius congeners
showed that the Indian G. giuris is close to the G. ankaranensis
due to 11.1% K2P distance than to the South African G. giuris by
12.3–13.1% K2P distance. The six studied Glossogobius con-
geners showed 11.1–25% genetic divergence among each
other. The particular sample specimen (ZSI G189) that cladded
with the South African G. giuris sequences was morphologically
also different from the other 14 sample specimens with regard
to the height of ventral fin and height of caudal fin. The height
of ventral fin was 73.65% in ZSI G189 specimen while it was
65.69–66.4% in other G. giuris specimens. The height of caudal
Table 1. K2P genetic distance of Glossogobius and Awaous species in studied dataset to reflect high genetic divergence between sample sequences of G. giuris as well
as database sequences.
Taxa K2P distance
G. giuris_Indian clade & sample
G. ankaranensis 0.111
G. giuris_South African clade 0.123 0.148
G. giuris_sample (ZSI G189) 0.131 0.152 0.014
G. aureus 0.153 0.143 0.140 0.137
G. callidus 0.183 0.199 0.171 0.177 0.168
G. circumpectus 0.184 0.189 0.210 0.212 0.201 0.219
G. olivaceus 0.206 0.206 0.228 0.230 0.222 0.240 0.025
Awaous_sp. database 0.231 0.245 0.215 0.220 0.237 0.250 0.186 0.201
Awaous sp. sample (Kaladan River) 0.241 0.228 0.191 0.192 0.211 0.237 0.205 0.228 0.101
A. aeneofuscus 0.247 0.263 0.207 0.213 0.230 0.241 0.205 0.230 0.094 0.099
A. ocellaris 0.257 0.260 0.213 0.213 0.233 0.255 0.208 0.226 0.101 0.120 0.105
Further, sample sequences of Awaous sp. from Kaladan River showed high divergence from available sequences of Awaous congeners in the database.
2B. A. LASKAR ET AL.
Downloaded by [New York University] at 11:10 05 March 2016
fin was 90.05% in ZSI G189 specimen while it was 78.79–79.16%
in other G. giuris specimens (cladded with Indian G. giuris). The
ventral fin and caudal fin height were greatly higher in percent
of head length in the particular sample specimen that cladded
with the South African G. giuris. This indicated that the two
clades of G. giuris are actually different species (Figure 1).
Although, most of the morphology are alike in the studied
specimens of both the clades, but the differences in fin height
appeared to be significant enough to consider them different
species. In the taxonomic history, G. gutum has been con-
sidered as a synonym of G. giuris (Kottelat 2013). We assumed
that G. gutum may be a distinct species from G. giuris that
JX983307
JX260874
ZSI G27_KT364541_Chindwin River
ZSI G202_KT364552_Gangetic River
ZSI G196_KT364547_Gangetic River
JX983309
JX983304
ZSI G25_KT364539_Chindwin River
ZSI G26_KT364540_Chindwin River
ZSI G28_KT364542_Chindwin River
ZSI G203_KT364553_Gangetic River
ZSI G198_KT364548_Gangetic River
ZSI G199_KT364549_Gangetic River
ZSI G201_KT364551_Gangetic River
JX260876
ZSI G192_KT364545_Gangetic River
ZSI G194_KT364546_Gangetic River
ZSI G200_KT364550_Gangetic River
JX260875
KF646581
KF646580
KF646579
KF646578
KF646577
KF646576
ZSI G190_KT364544_Gangetic River
G. giuris_India
G. ankaranensis
JQ619668
G. giuris_Gangetic River
ZSI G189_KT364543
JF493543
JF493540
JF493542
JF493539
G. giuris_South Africa
KC789534
EF609360
KC789535
KJ202163
KJ202164
EF607394
KJ669470
G. aureus
JF493534
JF493533
JF493535
JQ619669
HQ945956
JF493536
JF493538
JF493537
G. callidus
NC 018824
JX536695 G. circumpectus
NC 016664
JQ001860 G. olivaceus
ZSI G73_KT364554
ZSI G77_KT364558
ZSI G74_KT364555
ZSI G76_KT364557
ZSI G75_KT364556
Awaous sp._Kaladan River
Awaous sp.
KF668869
A. ocellaris
JX983227
HQ945921
HQ945950
HQ945930
HQ945923
A. aeneofuscus
97
62
100
72
47
64
100
100
84
100
38
68
100
100
60
54
100
81
100
22
70
100
100
90
100
45
98
71
94 95
100
64
26
64
17
48
44
31
17
17
39
0.02
ZSI G190
ZSI G189
ZSI G74
Figure 1. Neighbor-joining tree delimits two clades of barcode sequences of South African and India specimens tagged by G. giuris in the database. One of the studied
sample sequence marked by black square cladded with South African G. giuris while the rest of 14 sample sequences marked by black dots cladded with Indian
G. giuris. The tree further reflects a distinct clade of five sample sequences marked by black dyes that cladded as a congener of Awaous belonging to the subfamily
Gobionellinae. Illustrated image of the representative sample with voucher number in each clade is provided with the respective clade.
MITOCHONDRIAL DNA 3
Downloaded by [New York University] at 11:10 05 March 2016
warrants further study with more samples. The study thereby
evidenced that either is a hidden or a previously synonymized
species actually contained in the G. giuris complex.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Director, Zoological Survey of India for providing
necessary facilities.
Disclosure statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest in any form related to this work.
Funding information
Funding support for this work was provided by DST-SERB Young Scientist
project (SB/FT/LS-162/2012) to BA, DBT Post-Doctoral Fellowship to SK and
the core funding of Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata. The funders had no
role in study design, data collection and analysis or preparation of the
manuscript.
References
Agorreta A, San Mauro D, Schliewen U, Van Tassell JL, Kovac
ˇic
´M, Zardoya R,
Ru¨ ber L. 2013. Molecular phylogenetics of Gobioidei and phylogenetic
placement of European gobies. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 69:619–633.
Eschmeyer WN. 2015. Catalog of Fishes, California Academy of Sciences;
[cited 2015 Jun 22] Available at: http://research.calacademy.org/
research/ichthyology/catalog/fishcatmain.asp
Froese R, Pauly D. 2015. FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication;
[cited 2015 Aug] Available at: www.fishbase.org
Goswami UC, Basistha SK, Bora D, Shyamkumar K, Saikia B, Changsan K.
2012. Fish diversity of North East India, inclusive of the Himalayan and
Indo Burma biodiversity hotspots zones: a checklist on their taxonomic
status, economic importance, geographical distribution, present status
and prevailing threats. Int J Biodivers Conserv. 4:592–613.
Hamilton F. 1822. An account of the fishes found in the River Ganges and its
branches. Edinburgh: Archibald Constable and Company 405.
Hebert PD, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR. 2003. Biological identifications
through DNA barcodes. Proc Biol Sci. 270:313–322.
Kottelat M. 2013. The fishes of the inland waters of southeast
Asia: a catalogue and core bibliography of the fishes known
to occur in freshwaters, mangroves and estuaries. Raff Bull
Zool. 27:1–663.
Kundu S, Laskar BA, Venkataraman K, Banerjee D, Kumar V. 2015. DNA
barcoding of Nilssonia congeners corroborates existence of wild N.
nigricans in northeast India. Mitochondrial DNA. Informa healthcare,
DOI:10.3109/19401736.2015.1046176.
Laskar BA, Bhattacharjee MJ, Dhar B, Mahadani P, Kundu S, Ghosh SK.
2013. The species dilemma of Northeast Indian Mahseer
(Actinopterygii: Cyprinidae): DNA barcoding in clarifying the riddle.
PLoS One. 8:e53704.
McClelland J. 1839. Indian Cyprinidae. Asiatic Researches. Calcutta: Bishop
College Press.
Mohlmann MS, Randall JE. 2002. Three new species of gobiid fishes of the
genus Amblyeleotris from the central and western pacific. Raff Bull Zool.
50:215–226.
Talwar PK, Jhingran A. 1991. Inland fishes of India and adjacent countries.
New Delhi: Oxford and IBH Publishing.
Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. 2013. MEGA6:
Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol.
30:2725–2729.
Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. 1997. The
CLUSTAL_X windows interface: Flexible strategies for multiple sequence
alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res.
25:4876–4882.
Viswambharan D, Pavan-Kumar A, Singh DP, Jaiswar AK, Chakraborty SK,
Nair JR, Lakra WS. 2015. DNA barcoding of gobiid fishes (Perciformes,
Gobiodei). Mitochondrial DNA. 26:15–9.
4B. A. LASKAR ET AL.
Downloaded by [New York University] at 11:10 05 March 2016