ArticlePDF Available

Gender, Identity, and Place: Understanding Feminist Geographies - by Linda McDowell, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999, 284 pp.

Gender, Identity, and Place:
Understanding Feminist Geographies,
by Linda McDowell, Minneapolis: University of
Minnesota Press, 1999, 284 pp.
Lorna Q. Israel
Asian Center
University of the Philippines, Philippines
To speak about woman or man is already to place themon the outside
that is also the public built by men, and into the privacy of the inside that
is also the home built for women. Linda McDowell makes geography
unmistakable for feminists, and gender palpable for geographers. For
those new to gender and geography, Gender, Identity, and Place is where
to start. For McDowell, the book is her attempt to answer the question
what has gender got to do with geography? She happily notes that the
offensive undertone in the question is gone, but not the question itself
McDowell surveys the historical, intellectual, and political settings of
feminist geography, which aims to show the mutuality of gender and
geography in place-making. Places are not just physical or spatial surfaces;
they are also about the boundaries that codify women’s and men’s “proper
place.” Additionally, sexuality, ethnicity, nationality or class may
disqualify a man or a woman from a certain place. Thus, one could
become “out of place” (4).
McDowell looks reassuringly at globalising forces, which have raised
Localities, Vol. 5, 2015, pp. 181-186
Lorna Q. Israel
anxiety that they might pave the way for a placeless and meaningless
world. On the contrary, however, globalising phenomena have
repositioned our understanding of where we are. From there, globalisation
can be approached as a “condition” for building or reviving places and
localities, imparting, vice versa, the global with a local sense (3).
Globalisation creates new places and new meanings, including the
meaning of geography itself. From defining place as a fixed cartographic
coordinates, geography now looks at it as “contested, fluid, and uncertain
(4), and not necessarily “stable and rooted (5).
McDowell relocates gender in the same coordinates of contestation,
fluidity and uncertainty.” In a didactic style, she reviews major thinking
and thinkers that contributed to a nuanced and discerning awareness of
gender and geography. One meets the likes of Simone de Beauvoir,
Chandra Talpade Mohanty, Gayatri Spivak, Judith Butler, Michel
Foucault, Neil Smith, Pierre Bourdieu, Doreen Massey and Gillian Rose.
Teasing out the blank from each and filling it up from another, McDowell
assembles a collection of texts without the tone of a moralising rhetorical
authority apparent in politicised analyses. Her exposition is clear, bracing
and amicably provocative. Readers are, therefore, allowed to witness the
changes and changing definition and politics of feminism and geography
from middle to the end of the 20th century.
Gender, Identity, and Place: Understanding Feminist Geographies is
organised in an “ascending spatial scale.” It begins with the ubiquitous yet
overlooked “place,” the Body (Ch. 2). This proceeds to the common but
“very loaded” term, the Home (Ch. 3), then to Community, City and
Locality, where class and ethnicity add another boundary between women
and men (Ch. 4). There is a place outside the home, the “inside” of the
Workplace (Ch. 5), whose “outside” is the streets and other open spaces
for pleasure or pain (Ch. 6). The next two chapters focus on the nation-
state with its power to include and exclude certain women and men (Ch.
7), and how certain groups of women and men are in “transit,” and
Gender, Identity, and Place
therefore “displaced” (Ch. 8).
From class inequality between women and men, gender has shifted to a
“new convergence of interest on language, symbolism, representations
and meanings (7) of exclusion and discrimination, transgression and
ambiguity, consolidation and fragmentation. Feminist theorising moved
gender from biology to culture to discourse to the “performative,” as well
as from sex to sexuality and from a singular focus on women to how men
are also gendered. Upon the collapse of the imagined international
sisterhood,” it became “impossible to cover one whole womankind” (26);
hence, the imperative of feminist geographies. After all, women are
actually separated and differentiated by places and locations.
McDowell reframes the body as a site geographically inscribed. She
makes us aware that a geography book with hills or valleys as cover is an
ingenuous portrayal of a naked woman’s body” traceable to women-
nature conflation (45). As a parallel, home is where men are hidden from
the public eye. Home is equally a man’s place; they return there for rest
and recreation (74).
Cities, cosmopolitan and inclusive though they might be, have a narrow
approach to where women should be. Their built environment is typically
marked by women’s absence in structures erected for male power, which
are also closed for lower-class men and those with outlawed sexualities.
The pub, the public house, is not really public while the maternity ward
wards off paternity (96). Public was supposed to be an encompassing
concept, along with citizenship and human rights. In practice, it becomes
expedient and unquestioned grounds for exclusion.
“Multiple users” in the public implies publics, and this demands a
multiple definition of the term itself (125), which McDowell derives from
literary and cultural studies. Baudelaire’s flâneur, the detached male
observer of the city, was challenged by Elizabeth Wilson’s flâneuse.
Wilson suggested that such a female figure was also present in modern
(Western) cities. The flâneuse had walked visibly and anonymously on
Lorna Q. Israel
city streets on the way to work. She shopped and gazed at consumables
just like the male flâneur” (154-155). Thus, the flâneur was reconfigured
into a feminized male” (156). In Liz Heron’s edited collection of 20th
century fiction, the independent and hardworking women workers
emerged as “masculinised female,” or androgynous figures (155).
McDowell leaves the readers wondering about an androgynous place.
Perhaps commercial spaces purvey androgyneity. Here, the spectacle of
desiring, fluid and ambiguously gendered subjects” (163) embody the
spirit of consumption.
In rural settings, gender and class ambiguity is also apparentin
bodies stripped of clothes that usually mark gender and social ranking.
Arguably, McDowell sees place as emanating from bodies that occupy it,
and without bodies, a place is meaningless. Moreover, the body operates
architecturally: it conquers space with gender-bending techniques as its
building principle.
The nation-state, which Anderson argued arose from a community of
readers of literary fiction and newspapers (198), is the prevailing master
plan for one’s racial or ethnic identity. It is heavily drawn from and
bordered by gender norms; the nation is the female to be protected and
defended by a strong and commanding male state. In the family of nations,
the nation-state is a heterosexual couple. As with the others, McDowell
imagines Anderson’s Imagined Communities with gender variables.
We await Anderson’s revision as he did for the second edition, where
he admits overlooking spaces as “necessary coordinates in thinking about
nationalism.” By that time, he might be imagining several places and
spaces--and genders--brought about by an escalating movement of people
across the globe in recent times. Many of these people “have been forced
to move,” so that their “normal” life is the opposite of settled, fixed and
permanent. Among them are the migrants whose movements are
extensively documented, except for “the journey itself” (203).
Uncovered by feminist historians is the multitude of unknown women
Gender, Identity, and Place
travelers and explorers who reached a “foreign land” as wives, tourists,
paid workers or pilgrims (206). If one accounts for the history of women’s
travels, one might see them outside the home, which is really very public,
for it serves as the “local ground of collective life” (208). This is the
implication of McDowell’s enthusiasm for looking at travel as the locus
of analysis. Travel opens more spaces and locations, but they are
unreachable if one departs from a static and fixed sense of place. Travel
foregrounds a locality that is not strictly local; outside boundaries
constitute it, hence the idea of the local with a global sense. A geographer
with such a sense will see the local as also the “articulation of global
processes” (209). In other words, the global localises as much as the local
From a feminist geographical perspective, the local with a sense of the
global creates not an “international sisterhood,” but a “cartography of
struggle” that maps the uneven situation of women around the world, as
well as alliances and linkages (214). This is particularly relevant to third-
world feminists, who are already in the first world where they continue
the politics of equality and identity.
McDowell’s position on travel and all the “fluidity” it implies is
upsetting to those with “fixed and static” predispositions. Calmly and
patiently, she points to its continuing relevance as well as limitations.
Attuned to disparities and inequalities of women and men across and
within places, gender nonetheless constructed a world in binary
opposition. Therefore, she posits a rethinking: that a static analysis
militates against understanding, and that the postmodern vocabularies that
inspired her discussions attempt for the opposite. Postmodernism became
fashionable for its “defiance” of modernity’s mind-set on singularity,
linearity and stability of a subject. McDowell uses it for what it does:
showing the limits of one’s analysis and politics.
The political project of a feminist geographer is not to look for a woman,
or a man, but to discover a plurality of genders in a place multiplied or re-
Lorna Q. Israel
placed by contestation, fluidity and uncertainty. In other words, s/he draws
not one world map, but maps of the world’s genders.
... In critical geography literature, several interpretations of space have often been debated. Feminist geographers have claimed that space is differently gendered, while others have highlighted the unequal character of space based on who uses it and when (Massey, 1994); (McDowell, 1999). In these instances, identity categories represent the many functions and meanings of a particular location. ...
Full-text available
Since the start of 2020, people all around the globe have been subject to life-limiting limitations duw to Covid-19 that is unprecedented. The world’s population has been dealing with previously unheard-of restrictions on their way of life since the start of 2020. The proper urban planning is essential because it relates to land management to create a healthy environment free from epidemics. It analyses the planning effectiveness on space as defended space using GIS tools. This research has used five criteria such as walkability, sidewalk comfortability (obstacles on the sidewalk), sidewalk safety (sidewalk width and covid-19 area rate), building design, and open space. This study concentrated on the Bukit Bintang neighborhood. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, a new zone with fortified boundaries was established to offer open space. Finally, the study’s goals and objectives have been achieved using AHP method. Additionally, several suggestions were made for future action so that the Bukit Bintang region’s red zone area design is being enhanced to minimize or lessen the effects of catastrophic epidemics, just like the case with the Corona outbreak.
Full-text available
As gender relations have spatial implications, girls’ and women’s daily activities are overshadowed by social, economic, and physical risks that limit their access to the public sphere and hence to opportunities. However, the lack of comparable and representative data still restricts the analysis of women’s and girls’ lived realities. This study utilizes a two-pronged qualitative methodological approach: 48 in-depth-interviews to understand how spaces become gendered, how they shape social norms, and what impact this process has on the mobility of different youth segments by sex, education, age, and employment status, and 12 participatory community mapping exercises to understand how young women and men use and perceive public space differently. The study demonstrates how sexual and gender-based violence render public spaces, in two slum areas of Greater Cairo, inaccessible to women and girls. Significantly different patterns of access to public spaces among males and females are recorded. Males cover far more ground than females in both areas of study and have access to more destinations, such as entertainment and sports facilities, whereas women constantly needed to legitimize their occupation of public spaces based on traditional gender roles. Additionally, the coping mechanisms that girls and women adopt to mitigate the constant threat of sexual violence further gender the public space by mainstreaming the notion that sexual violence is a normal part of any girl or woman’s experience of public space—forcing women to retreat further.
Urban spaces are recognized as contested spaces where the ‘right to the city’ itself is contingent upon a number of social variables which includes gender. The United Nations agenda for sustainable development includes 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) of which Gender Equality (SDG 5), Reduced Inequalities (SDG 10), Sustainable Cities and Communities (SDG 11) could be used to address the issue of women in urban spaces more directly. While these UN Development goals focus quite explicitly on material infrastructure and measurable indicators, it is argued here that the idea of a sustainable city is simply untenable unless such cities are free of fear of violence for women. The objectives of this chapter are manifold. Firstly, drawing upon literature it builds on the idea of a gender equal and fear free city as an inclusive urban space. Secondly, it seeks to provide a theoretical framework for mapping gendered resistances in urban spaces as a means to achieve such inclusive, fear free and sustainable city spaces. Finally, contemporary urban movements are examined as gendered resistances to reclaim space and inclusivity at different scales. The study is theoretical in its approach and eschews the data driven positivist perspective in favour of feminist readings of urban spaces, and gendered resistances.
More than a quarter century after the Beijing Platform for Action solidified the importance of gender equality in international development, it is timely to review the conceptual approaches used to assess the gendered impacts of interventions. This paper presents a systematic review of recent investigations of gender equality from development-related academic literature (2009–2019) using two analytical approaches. First, we visualise trends based on bibliographic, methodological, contextual and conceptual aspects (n = 150). Second, we explore the theoretical approaches used to conceptualise gendered change through co-citation analysis (n = 61). Our trend analysis shows a breadth of relevant disciplinary perspectives but limited geographic and content foci. Additionally, very few studies explore gender equality dynamics that involve men and boys. Our exploration of theoretical foundations identifies four conceptualisations of gendered change, each reflecting the divergent disciplines, actors and interests that operate in the gender and development space. These conceptualisations each rely on and expand the concept of empowerment. By critically reflecting on feminist principles, future studies can transcend narrower empowerment framings and contribute more meaningfully to the aim of gender transformative development. Supplemental data for this article is available online at .
Difficulties in balancing work and non-work roles have a negative impact on an individual’s life satisfaction. This study investigates the relationship between work-life balance and life satisfaction across the United Kingdom and Spain. It also explores the moderating effects of individual orientations of collectivism and gender identity. The used scales measured Work-life Balance (WLB), Life Satisfaction (LS), Collectivism vs. Individualism orientations, and Gender identity. Collectivism/Individualism was measured and analysed at individual-level rather than at cultural-level. Data was collected from 52 British and 69 Spanish full-time employed women through an online survey. Correlational analyses and hierarchical multiple regression were conducted. Findings indicated that work-life balance had positive effects on life satisfaction across two different cultures. Those effects were stronger for British than Spanish women. Moderating effects were not found. Although, work-life balance, collectivism individual-orientation, and feminine identity predicted life satisfaction in the UK and only work-life balance predicted life satisfaction in Spain. This study extends the literature on work-life balance and life satisfaction relationship and the influence of culture, whilst also contributing to the under-researched area of the influence of gender identity on that relationship. The results might contribute to developing better strategies for promoting work-life balance
There are four periods in the development of gender geography since its inception in the 1970s in the Anglo-American school of human geography to nowdays. It’s periods were changing with the development of the methodology of feminist and gender studies. Contemporary gender geography has moved beyond the Anglo-American school, because it has become an international subdiscipline, and beyond analyses of gender differences because in the direction of intersectionality it began to focus on intersection of gender with other differences (racial, ethnic, class, etc.). Russia has not yet formed its own school of gender geography, but this area is receiving increasing attention as well as by Russian geographers, as by anthropologists, sociologists and economists. Classical gender geography is based on gender and feminist theories and human geography. Gender, like place, is a social construction. At different scales of space, there are different mechanisms for constructing gender differences. The scales and objects of research in classical gender geography can be divided into traditional and specifi (new) ones for Russian socio-economic geography. Traditional scales include local, regional, and national scales, while objects include mobility and migration. Specifi (new) scales are the micro-levels of home, work, and public urban space, and the object is the human body. The article illustrates that gender geography occupies an important place in foreign socio-economic geography, and gender processes – in regional development, which, in turn, emphasizes the need to develop gender geography in Russia.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.