ArticlePDF Available

Abstract

To promote optimal health and well-being, adults aged 18-60 years are recommended to sleep at least 7 hours each night (1). Sleeping <7 hours per night is associated with increased risk for obesity, diabetes, high blood pressure, coronary heart disease, stroke, frequent mental distress, and all-cause mortality (2-4). Insufficient sleep impairs cognitive performance, which can increase the likelihood of motor vehicle and other transportation accidents, industrial accidents, medical errors, and loss of work productivity that could affect the wider community (5). CDC analyzed data from the 2014 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) to determine the prevalence of a healthy sleep duration (≥7 hours) among 444,306 adult respondents in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. A total of 65.2% of respondents reported a healthy sleep duration; the age-adjusted prevalence of healthy sleep was lower among non-Hispanic blacks, American Indians/Alaska Natives, Native Hawaiians/Pacific Islanders, and multiracial respondents, compared with non-Hispanic whites, Hispanics, and Asians. State-based estimates of healthy sleep duration prevalence ranged from 56.1% in Hawaii to 71.6% in South Dakota. Geographic clustering of the lowest prevalence of healthy sleep duration was observed in the southeastern United States and in states along the Appalachian Mountains, and the highest prevalence was observed in the Great Plains states. More than one third of U.S. respondents reported typically sleeping <7 hours in a 24-hour period, suggesting an ongoing need for public awareness and public education about sleep health; worksite shift policies that ensure healthy sleep duration for shift workers, particularly medical professionals, emergency response personnel, and transportation industry personnel; and opportunities for health care providers to discuss the importance of healthy sleep duration with patients and address reasons for poor sleep health.
Continuing Education examination available at
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/cme/conted_info.html#weekly.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
Weekly / Vol. 65 / No. 6 February 19, 2016
INSIDE
142 Cluster of HIV Infections Attributed to Unsafe
Injection Practices — Cambodia,
December 1, 2014–February 28, 2015
146 Update: Influenza Activity — United States,
October 4, 2015–February 6, 2016
154 Local Transmission of Zika Virus — Puerto Rico,
November 23, 2015–January 28, 2016
159 Notes from the Field: Evidence of Zika Virus
Infection in Brain and Placental Tissues from Two
Congenitally Infected Newborns and Two Fetal
Losses — Brazil, 2015
161 Notes from the Field: Administration Error Involving
a Meningococcal Conjugate Vaccine — United
States, March 1, 2010–September 22, 2015
163 Notes from the Field: Nosocomial Outbreak of
Middle East Respiratory Syndrome in a Large
Tertiary Care Hospital — Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 2015
165 QuickStats
To promote optimal health and well-being, adults aged
18–60 years are recommended to sleep at least 7 hours each night
(1). Sleeping <7 hours per night is associated with increased risk
for obesity, diabetes, high blood pressure, coronary heart disease,
stroke, frequent mental distress, and all-cause mortality (24).
Insufficient sleep impairs cognitive performance, which can
increase the likelihood of motor vehicle and other transportation
accidents, industrial accidents, medical errors, and loss of work
productivity that could affect the wider community (5). CDC
analyzed data from the 2014 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance
System (BRFSS) to determine the prevalence of a healthy sleep
duration (≥7 hours) among 444,306 adult respondents in all
50 states and the District of Columbia. A total of 65.2% of
respondents reported a healthy sleep duration; the age-adjusted
prevalence of healthy sleep was lower among non-Hispanic blacks,
American Indians/Alaska Natives, Native Hawaiians/Pacific
Islanders, and multiracial respondents, compared with non-
Hispanic whites, Hispanics, and Asians. State-based estimates of
healthy sleep duration prevalence ranged from 56.1% in Hawaii
to 71.6% in South Dakota. Geographic clustering of the lowest
prevalence of healthy sleep duration was observed in the southeast-
ern United States and in states along the Appalachian Mountains,
and the highest prevalence was observed in the Great Plains states.
More than one third of U.S. respondents reported typically sleep-
ing <7 hours in a 24-hour period, suggesting an ongoing need for
public awareness and public education about sleep health; worksite
shift policies that ensure healthy sleep duration for shift workers,
particularly medical professionals, emergency response personnel,
and transportation industry personnel; and opportunities for
health care providers to discuss the importance of healthy sleep
duration with patients and address reasons for poor sleep health.
BRFSS* is a state-based, random-digit–dialed telephone survey
of the noninstitutionalized U.S. population aged ≥18 years. BRFSS
is conducted collaboratively by state health departments and CDC
(6) among both landline and cell phone respondents, and data are
weighted to state population estimates. Response rates for BRFSS
are calculated using standards set by the American Association
of Public Opinion Research Response Rate Formula #4. The
response rate is defined as the number of respondents who com-
pleted the survey as a proportion of all eligible and likely eligible
persons. The median response rate for all states and territories in
2014 was 47.0% and ranged from 25.1% to 60.1%.
Survey respondents in 2014 were asked, “On average, how
many hours of sleep do you get in a 24-hour period?” Hours of
Prevalence of Healthy Sleep Duration among Adults — United States, 2014
Yong Liu, MD1; Anne G. Wheaton, PhD1; Daniel P. Chapman, PhD1; Timothy J. Cunningham, ScD1; Hua Lu, MS1; Janet B. Croft, PhD1
* 2014 BRFSS Summary Data Quality Report (http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/
annual_data/2014/pdf/2014_DQR.pdf).
http://www.aapor.org/Standards-Ethics/Standard-Definitions-(1).aspx.
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
138 MMWR / February 19, 2016 / Vol. 65 / No. 6 US Department of Health and Human Services/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
The MMWR series of publications is published by the Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC),
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA 30329-4027.
Suggested citation: [Author names; first three, then et al., if more than six.] [Report title]. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2016;65:[inclusive page numbers].
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Thomas R. Frieden, MD, MPH, Director
Harold W. Jaffe, MD, MA, Associate Director for Science
Joanne Cono, MD, ScM, Director, Office of Science Quality
Chesley L. Richards, MD, MPH, Deputy Director for Public Health Scientific Services
Michael F. Iademarco, MD, MPH, Director, Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services
MMWR Editorial and Production Staff (Weekly)
Sonja A. Rasmussen, MD, MS, Editor-in-Chief
Charlotte K. Kent, PhD, MPH, Executive Editor
Jacqueline Gindler, MD, Editor
Teresa F. Rutledge, Managing Editor
Douglas W. Weatherwax, Lead Technical Writer-Editor
Soumya Dunworth, PhD, Teresa M. Hood, MS,
Technical Writer-Editors
Martha F. Boyd, Lead Visual Information Specialist
Maureen A. Leahy, Julia C. Martinroe,
Stephen R. Spriggs, Moua Yang, Tong Yang,
Visual Information Specialists
Quang M. Doan, MBA, Phyllis H. King,
Teresa C. Moreland, Terraye M. Starr,
Information Technology Specialists
MMWR Editorial Board
Timothy F. Jones, MD, Chairman
Matthew L. Boulton, MD, MPH
Virginia A. Caine, MD
Katherine Lyon Daniel, PhD
Jonathan E. Fielding, MD, MPH, MBA
David W. Fleming, MD
William E. Halperin, MD, DrPH, MPH
King K. Holmes, MD, PhD
Robin Ikeda, MD, MPH
Rima F. Khabbaz, MD
Phyllis Meadows, PhD, MSN, RN
Jewel Mullen, MD, MPH, MPA
Jeff Niederdeppe, PhD
Patricia Quinlisk, MD, MPH
Patrick L. Remington, MD, MPH
Carlos Roig, MS, MA
William L. Roper, MD, MPH
William Schaffner, MD
sleep were recorded in whole numbers by rounding 30 minutes
or more up to the next whole hour and dropping 29 or fewer
minutes. The age-adjusted prevalence and 95% confidence
interval (CI) of the recommended healthy sleep duration
(≥7 hours) was calculated by state and selected characteristics,
and adjusted to the 2000 projected U.S. population aged
≥18 years. For comparisons of prevalence between subgroups,
statistical significance (p<0.05) was determined by t-tests. All
indicated differences between subgroups are statistically signifi-
cant. Statistical software programs that account for the complex
sampling design of the BRFSS were used for the analysis.
Among 444,306 respondents, 11.8% reported a sleep duration
≤5 hours, 23.0% reported 6 hours, 29.5% reported 7 hours, 27.7%
reported 8 hours, 4.4% reported 9 hours, and 3.6% reported
≥10 hours. Overall, 65.2% reported the recommended healthy
sleep duration (age-adjusted prevalence=64.9%) (Table 1). The
age-specific prevalence of sleeping ≥7 hours was highest among
respondents aged ≥65 years (73.7%) compared with other age
groups. The age-adjusted prevalence of healthy sleep duration was
lower among Native Hawaiians/Pacific Islanders (53.7%), non-
Hispanic blacks (54.2%), multiracial non-Hispanics (53.6%),
and American Indians/Alaska Natives (59.6%) compared with
non-Hispanic whites (66.8%), Hispanics (65.5%), and Asians
(62.5%). Respondents who indicated they were unable to work
or unemployed had lower age-adjusted healthy sleep duration
prevalences (51.0% and 60.2%, respectively) than did employed
respondents (64.9%). The prevalence of healthy sleep duration
was highest among respondents with a college degree or higher
(71.5%). The prevalence was higher among married respondents
(67.4%) compared with those who were divorced, widowed, or
separated (55.7%), or never married (62.3%).
Prevalence of healthy sleep duration varied among states
and ranged from 56.1% in Hawaii to 71.6% in South Dakota
(Table 2). Most of the Great Plains states were in the upper
quintile for healthy sleep duration; states in the southeastern
United States and along the Appalachian Mountains tended
to be in the lower quintiles (Figure).
Discussion
This is the first published report to document state-based
estimates of self-reported healthy sleep duration for all 50
states and the District of Columbia. On average, 65.2% of
adult respondents reported a healthy sleep duration. The
geographic distribution pattern of low healthy sleep duration
prevalence is consistent with 2008 state prevalence patterns of
perceived insufficient rest or sleep among U.S. adults (7). The
lower healthy sleep duration prevalence in the BRFSS among
non-Hispanic black adults relative to non-Hispanic whites is
consistent with a previous nationwide 2007–2010 comparison
from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
(NHANES) (8). The results also suggest that employment
and higher education might be determinants of healthy sleep.
A lower prevalence of healthy sleep duration was observed in
the southeastern United States and in states along the Appalachian
Mountains. This distribution is similar to geographic variations in
prevalence estimates for obesity (9) and diabetes (9) and death rates
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
MMWR / February 19, 2016 / Vol. 65 / No. 6 139
US Department of Health and Human Services/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
from heart disease§ and stroke. Short sleep duration (<7 hours per
night) and other indicators of poor sleep health are associated with
greater insulin resistance, metabolic abnormalities, and weight gain
(5), which might then result in diabetes and adverse cardiovascular
outcomes. A sleep duration of ≥7 hours is associated with lower
prevalence estimates of cigarette smoking, leisure-time physical
inactivity, and obesity compared with a short sleep duration.**
Although unhealthy adults with chronic conditions might sleep
longer (2,3), little empirical evidence exists to indicate that long
sleep duration (≥9 hour per night) causes adverse conditions among
healthy adults exists (1).
TABLE 1. Age-specific and age-adjusted* percentage of adults who
reported ≥7 hours sleep per 24-hour period, by selected characteristics
— Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2014
Characteristic No.% (95% CI)§
Total 444,306 NA
Unadjusted NA 65.2 (64.9–65.5)
Age-adjusted NA 64.9 (64.6–65.2)
Age group (yrs)
18–24 23,234 67.8 (66.8–68.7)
25–34 42,084 62.1 (61.3–62.9)
35–44 52,385 61.7 (60.9–62.5)
45–64 173,357 62.7 (62.2–63.1)
≥65 153,246 73.7 (73.2–74.2)
Sex*
Male 185,796 64.6 (64.2–65.0)
Female 258,510 65.2 (64.8–65.7)
Race/Ethnicity*
White, non-Hispanic 348,988 66.8 (66.4–67.1)
Black, non-Hispanic 33,535 54.2 (53.3–55.2)
Hispanic 29,044 65.5 (64.5–66.4)
American Indian/Alaska Native 6,862 59.6 (57.1–62.1)
Asian 8,313 62.5 (60.2–64.7)
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 797 53.7 (47.2–60.0)
Multiracial, non-Hispanic 8,241 53.6 (51.5–55.7)
Other, non-Hispanic 1,943 62.0 (58.1–65.8)
Employment status*
Employed 220,751 64.9 (64.4–65.3)
Unemployed 19,300 60.2 (58.8–61.6)
Retired 130,478 60.9 (54.4–67.1)
Unable to work 31,953 51.0 (49.4–52.5)
Homemaker/student 37,393 69.5 (68.5–70.5)
Education level*
Less than high school diploma 33,833 62.5 (61.5–63.5)
High school diploma 125,462 62.4 (61.8–63.0)
Some college 120,814 62.4 (61.8–62.9)
College graduate or higher 161,088 71.5 (71.0–71.9)
Marital status*
Married 238,262 67.4 (66.9–67.9)
Divorced, widowed, separated 126,519 55.7 (54.5–56.9)
Never married 65,232 62.3 (61.5–63.2)
Member of unmarried couple 11,152 65.2 (63.3–67.1)
Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; NA = not applicable.
* Age-adjusted to the 2000 projected U.S. population aged ≥18 years, except
for age groups.
Unweighted sample of respondents. Categories might not sum to sample total
because of missing responses.
§ Weighted percentage and 95% CI.
TABLE 2. Age-adjusted* percentage of adults who reported ≥7 hours
sleep per 24-hour period, by state — Behavioral Risk Factor
Surveillance System, United States, 2014
State No.% (95% CI)§
Alabama 8,335 61.2 (59.6–62.8)
Alaska 4,286 65.0 (62.9–67.0)
Arizona 14,437 66.7 (65.3–68.0)
Arkansas 5,067 62.6 (60.3–64.9)
California 8,660 66.4 (65.1–67.7)
Colorado 13,043 71.5 (70.5–72.5)
Connecticut 7,707 64.8 (63.2–66.5)
Delaware 4,153 62.4 (60.0–64.6)
District of Columbia 3,866 67.8 (65.4–70.2)
Florida 9,565 64.2 (62.7–65.7)
Georgia 6,164 61.3 (59.5–63.0)
Hawaii 7,110 56.1 (54.3–57.8)
Idaho 5,380 69.4 (67.4–71.2)
Illinois 5,023 65.6 (63.7–67.4)
Indiana 11,239 61.5 (60.2–62.8)
Iowa 7,976 69.0 (67.5–70.4)
Kansas 13,442 69.1 (68.1–70.1)
Kentucky 10,890 60.3 (58.7–61.9)
Louisiana 6,608 63.7 (62.2–65.2)
Maine 8,980 67.1 (65.6–68.6)
Maryland 12,171 61.1 (59.4–62.8)
Massachusetts 15,072 65.5 (64.2–66.8)
Michigan 8,275 61.3 (59.8–62.8)
Minnesota 16,049 70.8 (69.9–71.7)
Mississippi 4,043 63.0 (60.8–65.2)
Missouri 6,888 66.0 (64.2–67.8)
Montana 7,306 69.3 (67.5–71.0)
Nebraska 22,007 69.6 (68.5–70.7)
Nevada 3,649 63.8 (61.3–66.3)
New Hampshire 6,022 67.5 (65.7–69.4)
New Jersey 12,617 62.8 (61.5–64.2)
New Mexico 8,737 68.0 (66.3–69.5)
New York 6,641 61.6 (60.1–63.2)
North Carolina 7,034 67.6 (66.2–68.9)
North Dakota 7,635 68.2 (66.4–70.0)
Ohio 10,712 62.1 (60.5–63.6)
Oklahoma 8,237 64.3 (62.9–65.7)
Oregon 5,099 68.3 (66.4–70.1)
Pennsylvania 10,707 62.5 (61.1–64.0)
Rhode Island 6,243 63.3 (61.4–65.1)
South Carolina 10,636 61.5 (60.2–62.9)
South Dakota 7,270 71.6 (69.6–73.5)
Tennessee 4,966 62.9 (60.7–65.0)
Texas 14,950 67.0 (65.7–68.3)
Utah 14,719 69.2 (68.3–70.1)
Vermont 6,357 69.0 (67.4–70.4)
Virginia 9,225 64.0 (62.6–65.3)
Washington 9,874 68.2 (66.8–69.6)
West Virginia 6,050 61.6 (60.0–63.2)
Wisconsin 6,955 67.8 (66.1–69.5)
Wyoming 6,229 68.7 (66.5–70.8)
Median (50 states and DC) 444,306 64.9 (64.6–65.2)
Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; DC = District of Columbia.
* Age-adjusted to the 2000 projected U.S. population aged ≥18 years.
Unweighted sample of respondents.
§ Weighted percentage and 95% CI.
§ National map of heart disease death rates by county (http://www.cdc.gov/
dhdsp/maps/national_maps/hd_all.htm).
National map of stroke death rates by county (http://www.cdc.gov/dhdsp/
maps/national_maps/stroke_all.htm).
** http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hestat/sleep04-06/sleep04-06.htm.
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
140 MMWR / February 19, 2016 / Vol. 65 / No. 6 US Department of Health and Human Services/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
The findings in this report are subject to at least two limita-
tions. First, sleep duration was obtained by self-report and was
not corroborated by actigraphy (sensor-measurement of motor
activity), polysomnography (sleep study), other objective mea-
sures, or sleep journals. The overall estimate of 65.2% in the
2014 BRFSS adult population is slightly higher than the popula-
tion estimate of 60.1% from the 2007–2008 NHANES (2) and
slightly lower than the prevalence of 71.6% reported from the
2008–2010 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS).†† Some
variation might be a result of the different wording used by the
different surveys. Although BRFSS and NHIS both asked about
typical sleep duration in a 24-hour period, NHANES asked
how much sleep respondents typically get “at night on weekdays
or workdays.” Finally, institutionalized respondents were not
assessed in the present investigation, NHANES, or NHIS; if
institutionalized persons are more likely to have shorter sleep
durations because of chronic physical or mental conditions, then
the prevalence of ≥7 hours might be overestimated in the BRFSS
population. However, the relationships of healthy sleep with
sociodemographic characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes are
consistent with the other studies despite variations in definitions
of healthy or optimal sleep.
Based on recent recommendations for healthy sleep duration
(1), these findings suggest that, although almost two thirds of
U.S. adults sleep ≥7 hours in a 24-hour period, an estimated
83.6 million U.S. adults sleep <7 hours. Therefore, clinicians
might find routine discussion of sleep health with their patients as
well as pursuit of explanations for poor sleep health an important
component of providing health care. Healthy sleep duration in
adults can be promoted by sleep health education and behavior
changes, such as setting a pattern of going to bed at the same time
each night and rising at the same time each morning; making
sure that the bedroom environment is quiet, dark, relaxing, and
neither too hot nor too cold; turning off or removing televisions,
computers, mobile devices, and distracting or light-emitting
electronic devices from the bedroom; and avoiding large meals,
nicotine, alcohol, and caffeine before bedtime.§§ Insomnia
symptoms, such as trouble falling or staying asleep can usually be
resolved with improved sleep habits or psychological or behavioral
therapies (10). At present, no professional sleep organizations
have issued consensus statements or recommendations about the
efficacy or safety of either over-the-counter or prescription sleep
aids for improving sleep duration in the general adult population.
In addition, strategies to reduce risks associated with shift work
and long work hours include designing better work schedules.§§
Evaluation and monitoring of sleep might also be an important
function of health care professionals, including sleep specialists
(5). Keeping a 10-day sleep journal or diary about sleep times,
napping, and behaviors that affect sleep, such as exercise, alcohol
use, and caffeine consumption, might be helpful before discussing
sleep problems with a physician.¶¶
FIGURE. Age-adjusted percentage of adults who reported ≥7 hours
of sleep per 24-hour period, by state — Behavioral Risk Factor
Surveillance System, United States, 2014
68.8–71.6
67.1–68.7
64.1–67.0
62.2–64.0
56.1–62.1
DC
Summary
What is already known about this topic?
Short sleep duration (<7 hours per night) is associated with greater
likelihoods of obesity, high blood pressure, diabetes, coronary
heart disease, stroke, frequent mental distress, and death.
What is added by this report?
The first state-specific estimates of the prevalence of a ≥7 hour
sleep duration in a 24-hour period show geographic clustering of
lower prevalence estimates for this duration of sleep in the
southeastern United States and in states along the Appalachian
Mountains, which are regions with the highest burdens of obesity
and other chronic conditions. Non-Hispanic black, American
Indian/Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, and
multiracial populations report a lower prevalence of ≥7 hours
sleep compared with the rest of the U.S. adult population.
What are the implications for public health practice?
The determination that more than a third of U.S. adults report
sleeping <7 hours and findings of geographic and sociodemo-
graphic variations in low prevalence of healthy sleep duration
suggest opportunities for promoting sleep health. These
opportunities include sleep health education, reducing racial/
ethnic and economic disparities, changes in work shift policies,
and routine medical assessment of patients’ sleep concerns in
health care systems.
§§ National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health: review of the evidence
about risks associated with shift work and long workhours and strategies to
reduce these risks, including suggestions for designing better work schedules
(http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2015-115).
¶¶ http://www.cdc.gov/sleep.
†† http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_10/sr10_257.pdf.
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
MMWR / February 19, 2016 / Vol. 65 / No. 6 141
US Department of Health and Human Services/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
1Division of Population Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention
and Health Promotion, CDC.
Corresponding author: Anne G. Wheaton, AWheaton@cdc.gov, 770-488-5362.
References
1. Watson NF, Badr MS, Belenky G, et al.; Consensus Conference Panel.
Joint consensus statement of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine
and Sleep Research Society on the recommended amount of sleep for a
healthy adult: methodology and discussion. Sleep 2015;38:1161–83.
2. Grandner MA, Chakravorty S, Perlis ML, Oliver L, Gurubhagavatula I.
Habitual sleep duration associated with self-reported and objectively
determined cardiometabolic risk factors. Sleep Med 2014;15:42–50.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2013.09.012.
3. Liu Y, Wheaton AG, Chapman DP, Croft JB. Sleep duration and chronic
diseases among US adults age 45 years and older: evidence from the 2010
Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Sleep 2013;36:1421–7.
4. Gallicchio L, Kalesan B. Sleep duration and mortality: a systematic review
and meta-analysis. J Sleep Res 2009;18:148–58. http://dx.doi.
org/10.1111/j.1365-2869.2008.00732.x.
5. Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. Sleep disorders and
sleep deprivation: an unmet public health problem. Washington, DC:
The National Academies Press; 2006. http://iom.nationalacademies.org/
Reports/2006/Sleep-Disorders-and-Sleep-Deprivation-An-Unmet-
Public-Health-Problem.aspx.
6. Mokdad AH, Stroup DF, Giles WH; Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance
Team. Public health surveillance for behavioral risk factors in a changing
environment. Recommendations from the Behavioral Risk Factor
Surveillance Team. MMWR Recomm Rep 2003;52(No. RR-9).
7. CDC. Perceived insufficient rest or sleep among adults—United States,
2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2009;58:1175–9.
8. CDC. QuickStats: Sleep duration among adults aged ≥20 years, by race/
ethnicity—National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, United
States, 2007–2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2013;62:755.
9 . CDC. Estimated county-level prevalence of diabetes and obesity—United
States, 2007. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2009;58:1259–63.
10. Schutte-Rodin S, Broch L, Buysse D, Dorsey C, Sateia M. Clinical
guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic insomnia in
adults. J Clin Sleep Med 2008;4:487–504.
... Early identification of COPD may have an impact on the way the disease progresses and develops. A respiratory disorder like COPD, can affect regular activities like physical movements and hence their social life [2], [3] and cause loss of Memory [4], [5] Patients with COPD may also have other chronic conditions such as arthritis, coronary heart disease, congestive heart failure, stroke, diabetes or asthma [6], [7]. It affects their mental state as well and pushes them into depression or other mental or emotional conditions. ...
Article
Full-text available
Digital Stethoscopes over recent years have gained acceptance among pulmonologists to perform auscultations due to their advantages over traditional stethoscopes. During the previous decade, researchers have prominently contributed to the development of algorithms aimed at enabling objective diagnosis of respiratory sounds and conditions, thereby affording individuals lacking medical expertise the capability to auscultate themselves. However, auscultation requires the personnel to be aware of the optimal chest position to place the device for a reliable diagnosis as well. This study aims to identify the optimal chest position to place a digital stethoscope's diaphragm to objectively diagnose Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Lung sound recordings from seven chest positions with data available in the ICBHI 2017 database namely, Anterior left (Al), Anterior right (Ar), Lateral left (Ll), Lateral right (Lr), Posterior left (Pl), Posterior right (Pr) and Trachea (Tc), were analyzed in this study. COPD+ and COPD- at diagnosis, each chest position was done objectively using Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCC) features and machine learning models namely Support Vector Machine and Decision Tree. The results indicate that the Posterior right (Pr) chest position offers superior precision, recall, and F1 score, with a recognition accuracy of 99.7% in COPD screening.
... Sleep deprivation is common, with 11.8% of respondents reporting less than 5 h sleep on average in a large US survey [25]. Deficits in motor performance due to sleep deprivation are equivalent to blood alcohol content of 0.05-0.1%, ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose of Review To review the literature examining the relationship between sleep and cognition, specifically examining the sub-domain of executive function. We explore the impact of sleep deprivation and the important question of how much sleep is required for optimal cognitive performance. We consider how other sleep metrics, such as sleep quality, may be a more meaningful measure of sleep. We then discuss the putative mechanisms between sleep and cognition followed by their contribution to developing dementia. Recent Findings Sleep duration and executive function display a quadratic relationship. This suggests an optimal amount of sleep is required for daily cognitive processes. Poor sleep efficiency and sleep fragmentation are linked with poorer executive function and increased risk of dementia during follow-up. Sleep quality may therefore be more important than absolute duration. Biological mechanisms which may underpin the relationship between sleep and cognition include brain structural and functional changes as well as disruption of the glymphatic system. Summary Sleep is an important modifiable lifestyle factor to improve daily cognition and, possibly, reduce the risk of developing dementia. The impact of optimal sleep duration and sleep quality may have important implications for every ageing individual.
... 76 In the United States, over one-third of adults sleep for less than 7 hours per night. 77 It's estimated that approximately 50 to 70 million Americans suffer from sleep disorders. 78 Sleep quality among the Chinese population is also a concern, with 25.9% of residents sleeping less than 7 hours per night, and 10.04% of respondents rating their sleep quality as very poor. ...
Article
Full-text available
Occupational stress and sleep quality are prevalent issues that can impact the physical and mental well-being of adults. An association between occupational stress and sleep quality has been found. However, this association is not entirely the same across different occupational groups. Additionally, variations are present in the research design and instruments employed.This systematic review aims to investigate the association between these two factors and identify gaps and limitations in current research. Articles published between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2022, were retrieved from the WOS, Scopus, and PubMed databases. Out of 1225 articles, 38 studies met the predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria and were included in the review. In the study, research designs, samples, instruments, and associations between occupational stress and sleep quality were statistically analyzed.These studies encompassed a diverse range of occupations, including both blue-collar and white-collar workers. Cross-sectional study is the most common research method. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) was the most frequently utilized tool for assessing sleep quality, while there was a wide variety of measurement tools employed to assess occupational stress. The association between occupational stress and sleep quality consistently demonstrated a negative association, although the specific dimensions varied among studies. Moreover, several other factors were identified to have direct or indirect effects on occupational stress and sleep quality. For future research in this field, we propose four recommendations: (1) Consider utilizing objective measures to assess occupational stress and sleep quality. (2) Employ controlled experiments to further validate the causal relationship between occupational stress and sleep quality. (3) Investigate occupational groups that have received less attention. (4) Take into account the potential influence of other factors on occupational stress and sleep quality.
Article
Full-text available
Although weekend recovery sleep is common, the physiological responses to weekend recovery sleep are not fully elucidated. Identifying molecular biomarkers that represent adequate versus insufficient sleep could help advance our understanding of weekend recovery sleep. Here, we identified potential molecular biomarkers of insufficient sleep and defined the impact of weekend recovery sleep on these biomarkers using metabolomics in a randomized controlled trial. Healthy adults (n = 34) were randomized into three groups: control (CON: 9-h sleep opportunities); sleep restriction (SR: 5-h sleep opportunities); or weekend recovery (WR: simulated workweek of 5-h sleep opportunities followed by ad libitum weekend recovery sleep and then 2 days with 5-h sleep opportunities). Blood for metabolomics was collected on the simulated Monday immediately following the weekend. Nine machine learning models, including a machine learning ensemble, were built to classify samples from SR versus CON. Notably, SR showed decreased glycerophospholipids and sphingolipids versus CON. The machine learning ensemble showed the highest G-mean performance and classified 50% of the WR samples as insufficient sleep. Our findings show insufficient sleep and recovery sleep influence the plasma metabolome and suggest more than one weekend of recovery sleep may be necessary for the identified biomarkers to return to healthy adequate sleep levels.
Article
Previous studies of natural variants in Drosophila melanogaster implicated the Wnt signaling receptor frizzled in sleep. Given that the Wnt signaling pathway is highly conserved across species, we hypothesized that frizzled class receptor 1 (Fzd1), the murine homolog of frizzled, would also have a role in sleep. Using a CRISPR transgenic approach, we removed most of the Fzd1 coding region from C57BL/6N mice. We used a video assay to measure sleep characteristics in Fzd1-deficient mice. As Wnt signaling is known to affect visuospatial memory, we also examined the impact of the deletion on learning and memory using the novel object recognition (NOR) paradigm. Fzd1-deficient mice had altered sleep compared to littermate controls. The mice did not respond differently to the NOR paradigm compared to controls but did display anxiety-like behavior. Our strategy demonstrates that the study of natural variation in Drosophila sleep translates into candidate genes for sleep in vertebrate species such as the mouse.
Article
Full-text available
Cardiovascular diseases remain the leading cause of death in the United States. Several studies have shown racial disparities in the cardiovascular outcomes. When compared to their Non-Hispanic White (NHW) counterparts, non-Hispanic Black (NHB) individuals have higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors and thus, increased mortality from atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases. This is evidenced by lower scoring in the indices of the American Heart Association's Life Essential 8 among NHB individuals. NHB individuals score lower in blood pressure, blood lipids, nicotine exposure, sleep, physical activity level, glycemic control, weight, and diet when compared to NHW individuals. Measures to improve these indices at the primary care level may potentially hold the key in mitigating the health care disparities in cardiovascular health experienced by NHB individuals.
Chapter
Full-text available
The Vinci Power Nap® system is a cutting-edge tool for reducing stress and jet lag effects associated with air travel, allowing for quick body–mind regeneration and improving well-being and the quality of night’s sleep. Power naps in a specially designed environment based on interdisciplinary science, can restore homeostasis and work–life balance, release stress and tensions, strengthens focus and efficiency, and recover energy for life to many overtired leaders, employees, and people with sleep disorders. Helpful in the therapy for hypersensitive people, after trauma, in depression, with oncological experiences, and many other diseases. The research made in UN projects at COP24 on leaders, travelers, and UNICEF Ukraine’s refugees show extraordinary relaxing properties, harmonizing sleep patterns and internal vital parameters (breath, heartbeat, and brain waves) thanks to zero gravity position, pulsating touch, frequency swinging, calming all senses and neuroarchitectural external conditions. Sleep is the basis of our psychophysical and immune regeneration and preventing errors resulting from stress and fatigue. The Vinci Power Nap® system is crucial for hotels and airports due to its ability to reduce discomfort associated with jet lag, providing great help to travelers such as business leaders, pilots, doctors, drivers, athletes, workers, soldiers, astronauts, tourists, etc.
Article
Full-text available
ABSTRACT: The American Academy of Sleep Medicine and Sleep Research Society recently released a Consensus Statement regarding the recommended amount of sleep to promote optimal health in adults. This paper describes the methodology, background literature, voting process, and voting results for the consensus statement. In addition, we address important assumptions and challenges encountered during the consensus process. Finally, we outline future directions that will advance our understanding of sleep need and place sleep duration in the broader context of sleep health.
Article
Full-text available
ABSTRACT: The American Academy of Sleep Medicine and Sleep Research Society recently released a Consensus Statement regarding the recommended amount of sleep to promote optimal health in adults. This paper describes the methodology, background literature, voting process, and voting results for the consensus statement. In addition, we address important assumptions and challenges encountered during the consensus process. Finally, we outline future directions that will advance our understanding of sleep need and place sleep duration in the broader context of sleep health.
Article
Full-text available
Insomnia is the most prevalent sleep disorder in the general population, and is commonly encountered in medical practices. Insomnia is defined as the subjective perception of difficulty with sleep initiation, duration, consolidation, or quality that occurs despite adequate opportunity for sleep, and that results in some form of daytime impairment.1 Insomnia may present with a variety of specific complaints and etiologies, making the evaluation and management of chronic insomnia demanding on a clinician's time. The purpose of this clinical guideline is to provide clinicians with a practical framework for the assessment and disease management of chronic adult insomnia, using existing evidence-based insomnia practice parameters where available, and consensus-based recommendations to bridge areas where such parameters do not exist. Unless otherwise stated, "insomnia" refers to chronic insomnia, which is present for at least a month, as opposed to acute or transient insomnia, which may last days to weeks.
Article
To examine the effects of obesity and frequent mental distress (FMD) on the relationship of sleep duration with coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke, and diabetes. Cross-sectional study. Population-based surveillance. There were 54,269 adults age 45 y or older who completed the 2010 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System survey in 14 states. Nearly one third (31.1% or an estimated 11.1 million) of respondents age 45 y and older reported being short sleepers (≤ 6 h), 64.8% being optimal sleepers (7-9 h), and 4.1% being long sleepers (≥ 10 h) in a 24-h period. Compared with the optimal sleep duration, both short and long sleep durations were significantly associated with obesity, FMD (mental health was not good ≥ 14 days during the past 30 days), CHD, stroke, and diabetes after controlling for sex, age, race/ethnicity, and education. The U-shaped relationships of sleep duration with CHD, stroke, and diabetes were moderately attenuated by FMD. The relationship between sleep duration and diabetes was slightly attenuated by obesity. Sleep duration had U-shaped relationships with leading chronic diseases. Further prospective studies are needed to determine how mental health and maintenance of a normal weight may interact with sleep duration to prevent chronic diseases. Liu Y; Wheaton AG; Chapman DP; Croft JB. Sleep duration and chronic diseases among US adults age 45 years and older: evidence from the 2010 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. SLEEP 2013;36(10):1421-1427.
Article
Epidemiologic studies have shown that sleep duration is associated with overall mortality. We conducted a systematic review of the associations between sleep duration and all-cause and cause-specific mortality. PubMed was systematically searched up to January, 2008 to identify studies examining the association between sleep duration and mortality (both all-cause and cause-specific) among adults. Data were abstracted serially in a standardized manner by two reviewers and analyzed using random-effects meta-analysis. Twenty-three studies assessing the associations between sleep duration and mortality were identified. All examined sleep duration measured using participant self-report. Among the 16 studies which had similar reference categories and reported sufficient data on short sleep and mortality for meta-analyses, the pooled relative risk (RR) for all-cause mortality for short sleep duration was 1.10 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.06, 1.15]. For cardiovascular-related and cancer-related mortality, the RRs associated with short sleep were 1.06 (95% CI: 0.94, 1.18) and 0.99 (95% CI: 0.88, 1.13), respectively. Similarly, among the 17 studies reporting data on long sleep duration and mortality, the pooled RRs comparing the long sleepers with medium sleepers were 1.23 (95% CI: 1.17, 1.30) for all-cause mortality, 1.38 (95% CI: 1.13, 1.69) for cardiovascular-related mortality, and 1.21 (95% CI: 1.11, 1.32) for cancer-related mortality. Our findings indicate that both short sleepers and long sleepers are at increased risk of all-cause mortality. Further research using objective measures of sleep duration is needed to fully characterize these associations.
Article
The Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) is a state-based system of health surveys. Information regarding health risk behaviors, clinical preventive health practices, and health-care access, primarily related to chronic disease and injury is obtained from a representative sample of adults in each state. Approximately 200,000 adult interviews are completed each year in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, and Guam. The challenge for BRFSS is how to effectively manage an increasingly complex surveillance system that serves the needs of numerous programs while facing changing telecommunication technology and the greater demand for more local-level data. To determine options and recommendations for how best to meet BRFSS future challenges, CDCs Behavioral Surveillance Branch conducted a 2-day strategy workshop, attended by survey-research specialists. The workshop featured presentations on the current system; emerging technologic challenges; telephone-surveying techniques; program perspectives of CDC, partner organizations, and states; and recommendations for change. This report summarizes the recommendations resulting from that workshop.