ArticlePDF Available

Replacement of whole milk by milk replacer in the ration of Holstein-Friesian calves raised in Eastern Turkey

Authors:
... A typical MR comprises of skim milk powder, whey powder and vegetable oils. Crude protein content is usually 20%, and the fat content typically ranges from 15 to 22% (DM basis) (Mete et al., 2000). ...
... Such practice is not feasible in a developing country like Nigeria where the demand for milk and milk products in human nutrition is constantly increasing as a result of the rapid increase in human population (ATA, 2013). The aim of using milk replacer is to cut down the cost of whole milk in calf rearing programme and to improve their performance (Mete et al., 2000). There are many types of low cost, high quality plant protein viz, soyflour, soymilk, soy protein concentrate and wheat protein which could be used in the formulation of milk replacers (Ghorbani et al., 2007). ...
... And the reports of Rahman et al. (1988) and Mete et al. (2000) who found that feeding soymilk based milk replacer to calves did not have any significant influence on wither height. However, the height at withers for calves in this study were within the range reported by Azevedo et al. (2016) for Holstein x Gyr crossbred calves fed increasing amounts of milk replacer powder in whole milk. ...
Thesis
Full-text available
An experiment was conducted in two stages. The first stage was to investigate the effect of soaking duration on the proximate composition and anti-nutritional factors (ANFs) of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merril), while the second stage was to evaluate the performance of Friesian x Bunaji calves fed different ratios of soy:cow milk. In stage one of the experiment, soybean was sourced, cleaned and divided into five groups (intended for the experimental treatments). The first group was the control (unsoaked soybean), while the other groups were soaked in clean water for 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours, respectively. The water was changed twice after every 24 hours of soaking. Thereafter, the soybean was rinsed, sun-dried for 8 days, milled, sieved and then taken to the laboratory for analyses. Results of the proximate composition showed that unsoaked soybean (control) had 40.28% crude protein, 14.11% fat and metabolizable energy of 3459.50 kcal/kg DM. While soybean soaked for 72 hours had 44.37% CP, 29.55% fat and ME value 5514.57 kcal/kg DM. Soaking improved the chemical composition as well as reduced the levels of anti-nutritional factors in the soybean especially at 72 hours duration. The crude protein content of the different ratios of soy:cow milk diets increased with increase levels of soymilk and varies from 3.29% in 0:100 to 5.23% in the diet containing 75:25 ratio of soy:cow milk. The total solid, fat, solid-not-fat and ash contents also followed similar pattern. In the second experiment, a growth trial was carried out to evaluate the feeding value of the best soaking duration (72hrs) in combination with cow milk at a ratio of 0:100 (control), 25:75, 50:50 and 75:25 soy:cow milk, respectively in the diets of Friesian x Bunaji calves. Sixteen calves with average body weight of 34.8±0.7kg were randomly assigned to four dietary treatments with 4 calves per treatment in a Completely Randomized Design. Results from the growth trial showed that there was no significant difference (P>0.05) in average total feed intake among calves fed the different ratios of soy:cow milk. Calves fed diet containing 25:75 ratio of soy:cow milk had the lowest total feed intake (409.64 kg), average daily feed intake (4.18 kg/day) and better total weight gain (74.25 kg), average daily weight gain (0.76 kg/day) and feed conversion ratio (5.52) as against (416.29 kg), (4.25 kg/day), (66.00 kg), (0.67 kg/day) and (6.31), respectively in calves fed cow milk alone (control). Inclusion of soymilk at different ratios had positive influence on some linear body measurements (body length, height at withers and heart girth) of calves. The blood parameters measured were within the normal range for healthy calves, indicating that soaking of soybean in water for 72 hours had significantly reduced the levels of ANFs in the soymilk fed to calves. White blood cells and glucose were within the normal range (4 – 12x109/l) and (40 – 100mg/dl), respectively. Feeding different ratios of soy:cow milk had positive influence on rumen metabolites (rumen fluid temperature, pH, NH3-N and TVFA) with 75:25 ratio of soy:cow milk raton having the highest concentration of RAN (13.84 mg/100ml). Sampling time significantly (P<0.05) influenced rumen temperature, pH, NH3-N and TVFA concentrations. Digestibility of DM, OM, CP, NDF and ADF were significantly (P<0.05) influenced by the inclusion of soymilk at different ratios. However, calves fed 25:75 and 75:25 ratios of soy:cow milk had better nutrient digestibility and nitrogen balance, respectively. The cost of cow milk per litre (N98.00) was about 3 times higher than soymilk (N33). Calves fed 25 and 50% soymilk had better feed cost per kg weight gain N496.10 and N469.67, respectively. Calves fed 75:25 ratio of soy:cow milk had the least total cost of feed consumed (N 30489.00). Indicating that feeding cow milk alone to calves was very expensive compared with feeding soy:cow milk at 75:25 ratio. It was concluded that soaking of soybean in water for 72 hours reduced the levels of ANFs and improved the nutritive value. Feeding 25:75 soy:cow milk improved live weight gain by 0.76 kg/day as against 0.67kg/day in calves fed cow milk alone. From an economic standpoint, feeding soy:cow milk at a ratio of 75:25 reduced the cost of feeding by (24.16%) as compared with feeding cow milk alone. Therefore, soaking of soybean in water for 72 hours was recommended for good result. And feeding calves with 25:75 ratio of soy:cow milk is recommended for better performance and feed conversion than feeding cow milk alone.
... Under these circumstances, we have to pay great attention on economic calf feeding programme. In a calf feeding programme, milk replacer and calf starter have been developed in many countries to reduce the amount of whole milk used in calf raising (Plaza and Fernandez, 1994;Sajko et al., 1998 andMete et al., 2000). In some countries, soymilk is being used as a novel milk replacer in calf raising facilities (Ghorbani et al., 2007). ...
... Statistically no significant differences were seen for total and daily height gain of three groups of calves. Similar results were also reported by Rahman et al. (1988) and Mete et al. (2000) who did not find any changes in wither height. ...
... Statistical analysis showed that no significant differences were seen for total and daily increment in length for all groups of calves. Wadud and Rahman (1978), Rahman et al. (1988) and Mete et al. (2000) also observed similar results among the groups of calves when calves were fed milk and milk replacer. ...
Article
Full-text available
An experiment was conducted to study the utilization of soymilk as milk replacer for raising calves. Nine crossbred calves were selected and divided into three groups on the basis of their body weight and genotype. The calves of group A were reared by cow milk, group B reared by strained soymilk and group C reared by unstrained soymilk. It was found that, total body weight gain of group A, B and C were 13.933 ± 1.222, 13.800 ± 0.917 and 13.233 ± 1.537 Kg, respectively. There was no significant difference among the three groups of calves. Non-significant differences were also seen for increment in wither height (5.588 ± 0.508, 5.419 ± 0.529 and 5.080 ± 0.440 cm, respectively), length (6.096 ± 0.440, 5.927 ± 0.388 and 5.503 ± 0.388 cm, respectively) and heart-girth (5.842 ± 0.440, 5.588 ± 0.916 and 5.419 ± 0.388 cm, respectively) of calves. Economic analysis showed that soymilk was cheaper than cow milk (Tk. 8.0 vs Tk. 44.0). It can be concluded that soymilk as milk replacer could be used successfully for raising dairy calves.
... Such practice is not feasible in the developing countries where milk by-products are scarce and expensive (Khan et al., 2012). Feeding milk replacer to calves is an alternative approach being used in many commercial dairy farms mainly in developed countries to combat this serious problem since long (Mete et al., 2000). The availability of cost effective milk replacer in the market is one of the major hindrance of calves' growth in Bangladesh. ...
... Such practice is not feasible in the developing countries where milk by-products are scarce and expensive (Khan et al., 2012). Feeding milk replacer to calves is an alternative approach being used in many commercial dairy farms mainly in developed countries to combat this serious problem since long (Plaza and Fernandez, 1994;Sajko et al.,1998 andMete et al., 2000). The availability of cost effective milk replacer in the market is one of the major hindrance of calves' growth in Bangladesh. ...
Article
Full-text available
The study was conducted to assess performance of Calf starter on buffalo calf rearing.The study was conducted at Monpura of BholaDistrict and Baufol of Patuakhali, Bangladesh during January, 2020 to June, 2020. A total of 30 buffalo calves of about 6-10 days of agewere selected randomly from study area and divided in two groups; having fifteen (15) calves in each .Calves were maintained underuniform managemental condition except milk feeding. The calves were weighed initially just after birth and 15days apart thereafter by aplatform digital balance. Each calf was weighed in the morningbefore feeding. Analysis of variance revealed that FCR of the values ofcontrol group (5.37) was significantly higher (P<0.05) than that of treatment group (4.09).Variable costs to raise buffalo calves during 75days of experiment were higher in treatmentgroup (Tk. 10089±2840 than control group (Tk. 8830±401). Results considering for dailyweight gain and FCR, it indicates that overall performance, calf starter group was found better than the conventional ration. (PDF) Comparative Performance of Buffalo Calves Fed on Whole Milk and Calf Starter. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355873393_Comparative_Performance_of_Buffalo_Calves_Fed_on_Whole_Milk_and_Calf_Starter [accessed Nov 14 2021].
... A typical MR comprises of skim milk powder, whey powder and vegetable oils. Crude protein content is usually 20%, and the fat content typically ranges from 15 to 22% (DM basis) (Mete et al., 2000). In developed countries, alternatives to whole milk feeding to pre-ruminants are formulated using by-products of milk processing industry (Oliveira et al., 2015). ...
... Such practice is not feasible in a developing country like Nigeria where the demand for milk and milk products in human nutrition is constantly increasing as a result of the rapid increase in human population (ATA, 2013). The aim of using milk replacer is to cut down the cost of whole milk in calf rearing programme and to improve their performance (Mete et al., 2000). There are many types of low cost, high quality plant protein viz, soyflour, soymilk, soy protein concentrate and wheat protein which could be used in the formulation of milk replacers (Ghorbani et al., 2007). ...
Article
Full-text available
The study was carried out to evaluate the growth performance and nutrient utilization of Friesian x Bunaji calves fed different ratios of soy:cow milk. Soybean was sourced, cleaned and soaked in clean water for 72 hours. The water was changed twice after every 24 hours of soaking. Thereafter, the soybean was rinsed, sun-dried for 8 days, milled, sieved and then taken to the laboratory for chemical analyses. Results showed that soymilk produced from the 72 hours soaked soybean contained 87.11% moisture, 12.89% total solid (TS), 3.30% fat, 9.59% solid-non-fat (SNF), 5.55% protein and 0.82% ash. While the milk obtained from Friesian x Bunaji cows had moisture, TS, fat, SNF, protein and ash content of 88.30%, 11.70%, 2.69%, 9.01%, 3.29% and 0.67%, respectively. The protein content of the different ratios of soy:cow milk diets increased with increase levels of soymilk and varies from 3.29% in 0:100 to 5.23% in 75:25 ratio of soy:cow milk. The TS, fat, SNF and ash contents also followed similar pattern. Sixteen Friesian x Bunaji dairy calves with body weight of 34.8±0.7kg were randomly assigned to four dietary treatments (which consisted of 0:100, 25:75, 50:50 and 75:25 ratios of soy:cow milk) with four calves per treatment in a Completely Randomized Design (CRD). Each calf received two litres of the mixture of soy:cow milk daily. Results from the growth trial showed significant (P>0.05) difference in total feed intake among calves fed the different ratios of soy:cow milk. Calves fed diet containing 25:75 ratio of soy:cow milk had the lowest total feed intake (409.64 kg), average daily feed intake (4.18 kg/day) and better (P<0.05) total weight gain (74.25 kg), average daily weight gain (0.76 kg/day) and feed conversion ratio (5.52) as against (416.29 kg), (4.25 kg/day), (66.00 kg), (0.67 kg/day) and (6.31), respectively in calves fed cow milk alone (control). Digestibility of dry matter, organic matter, crude protein, neutral detergent fibre and acid detergent fibre were significantly (P<0.05) influenced by the inclusion of soymilk at different ratios. Nitrogen retained were similar (P>0.05) in calves fed 75:25, 50:50 and 25:75 ratios of soy:cow milk. However, calves fed 25:75 and 75:25 ratios of soy:cow milk had better nutrient digestibility and nitrogen balance, respectively. It was concluded that feeding 25:75 soy:cow milk gave higher live weight gain of 0.76 kg/day as against 0.67kg/day in calves fed cow milk alone. Therefore, feeding calves with 25:75 ratio of soy:cow milk is recommended for better growth performance and feed conversion than feeding cow milk alone.
... Therefore, it is necessary to address these issues of whole milk feeding and its effects on farmers' economy. Today, several countries have created milk substitutes as an alternative to whole milk feeding thus, reducing the expense of calf rearing and freeing up milk for human use (Mete et al., 2000). Besides being an economical alternative to whole milk, milk replacer feeding have other advantages viz. ...
Article
Full-text available
Present study was conducted to compare the effect of whole milk and milk replacer feeding on health parameters in Murrah buffalo calves. 5-day old eighteen Murrah buffalo calves were divided into three treatment groups viz. C (control), T (treatment 1) and T (treatment 2). The calves of C 1 2 group received whole milk, T group received commercial milk replacer (CMR) and T group received formulated milk replacer (FMR) as per the 1 2 feeding schedule of the farm. All calves received calf starter starting from 10 days of age. Health parameters (temperature, pulse rate, respiration rate, fecal consistency score (FCS) and diarrhoea days) were recorded once daily in the morning throughout the trial period. The results revealed a non-significant difference in the rectal temperature between the treatment groups; overall pulse rate differed significantly (p 0.05) between T and C and 1 T and T group; overall respiration rate varied significantly (P 0.05) between T and C and T and T group. A non-significant difference was 1 2 2 2 1 observed in the overall FCS between the treatment groups. However, mean diarrhoea days was more in milk replacer fed group. It is concluded that milk replacer feeding does not have adverse health effects in calves in comparison to whole milk feeding except more diarrhoea days.
... In feeding milk replacers with 25% and 50% soymilk Ghorbani et al. (2007) reported that the live weight gain of the calves did not show any significant difference. Similarly, Masum et al. (2009) and Mete et al. (2000) did not find significant differences in pre-slaughter body measurements between milk replacer and whole milk fed calves. Lanza et al. (2006) reported that whole milk fed kids grew faster resulting a higher carcass weight as compared to the milk replacer fed group. ...
... Shortage of milk especially during the early stage of life results in starvation with a consequence of stunted growth and mortality in calves which also affects their productive and reproductive performance. Feeding milk replacer to calves is an alternative approach being used in many commercial dairy farms mainly in developed countries to combat this serious problem (Mete et al., 2000). There are many types or forms of low cost, high quality plant protein viz, soyflour, soymilk, soy protein concentrate and wheat protein which could be used in the formulation of milk replacers. ...
Conference Paper
Full-text available
The study was carried out to evaluate the effect of feeding different ratios of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merril) milk and Friesian x Bunaji cow milk on pre-weaning growth rate, weaning weight and thermoregulatory parameters of Friesian x Bunaji calves. Sixteen (16) calves with average body weight of 34.8±0.7 kg were randomly assigned to four dietary treatments with 4 calves per treatment in a Completely Randomized Design. Results showed that calves had significantly (p<0.05) different weights at birth. There was also significant (p<0.05) difference in pre-weaning growth rate (PWGR), pre-weaning average daily weight gain (PWADWG) and weaning weights (WW) of calves across the treatments. Calves fed diet containing 25:75 ratio of soy:cow milk had higher PWGR (108.75 g), PWADWG (109.41 g) and WW (109.75 kg) followed by those on treatment containing 50:50 ratio of soy:cow milk (105.00 g, 105.73 g and 106.00 kg), respectively. There was no significant (p>0.05) difference in rectal temperature (RT) of calves across the treatments, but heart rate (HR) and respiratory rate (RR) differed significantly (p<0.05) as the level of soymilk increased in the diet. The highest and lowest HR (97.43 bpm) and (90.00 bpm) were observed in calves fed diets containing 75:25 and 25:75 ratios of soy:cow milk, respectively. While the highest (43.43 brpm) and lowest (40.86 brpm) respiratory rates were recorded in calves fed diets containing 75:25 and 50:50 ratios of soy:cow milk, respectively. All the thermoregulatory parameters measured were within the normal range for healthy calves. Therefore, feeding calves with 25:75 ratio of soy:cow milk is recommended for better weaning weight than feeding cow milk alone.
... Farmers need a cheap alternative for fresh milk. Milk replacer and calf starter have been developed in many countries with an aim to cut down the cost of whole milk in calf rearing programme (Mete et al. 2000). The main objectives of the calf management are to maintain excellent health condition, good progress on growth to achieve the target body weight, and developing the rumen and thus, the calf can easily adapt to the feedstuffs in the ration after weaning. ...
... Such practice is not feasible in the developing countries where milk by-products are scarce and expensive (Khan et al., 2012). Feeding milk replacer to calves is an alternative approach being used in many commercial dairy farms mainly in developed countries to combat this serious problem since long (Plaza and Fernandez, 1994;Sajko et al.,1998 andMete et al., 2000). The availability of cost effective milk replacer in the market is one of the major hindrance of calves' growth in Bangladesh. ...
Article
Full-text available
A study was conducted with objectives to determine the comparative growth performance of calves fed shoti, wheat and soybean based milk replacers and their economics. To achieve the objectives, a total of 24 local calves of about 6-10 days of age were selected and divided in four groups; having six (6) calves in each. A limited suckling with feeding whole milk considered as control (To), suckling along with feeding of wheat, shoti and soybean based milk replacer considered as treatments and denoted as T1, T2 and T3, respectively. Results obtained in the present study revealed that, the total DM, OM and CP intake did not differ significantly (p>0.05) among the treatment groups. However, calves in T2 group sucked significantly (p<0.01) higher milk or milk DM compared to milk sucked by calves in T0, T1 and T3, respectively. No significant differences (p>0.05) was observed in average daily weight gain (ADG) of calves among the treatment groups. The feed conversion efficiency (FCR) was relatively better (p>0.05) in calves those fed shoti and soybean based MR compared to calves fed wheat and control diets. The overall levels of both glucose and BUN did not differ significantly (p>0.05) in calves under different treatment groups. The total cost of per kg wheat (T1), shoti (T2) and Soybean (T3) based MR were Tk. 52.69, Tk. 94.45 and Tk. 51.11, respectively. The processing cost per kg MR was increased Tk. 41.00-43.00 in T2 group than that of T1 and T3 groups. The feeding cost per calf per day was reduced Tk. 88.93.00 Tk. 57.87 and Tk. 82.55 in T1, T2 and T3, respectively than that of T0 group. Results considering for both FCR and per day feeding cost, it indicates that T2 and T3 diets i.e, shoti and soybean based MR maintained growth of calves compared to wheat based MR and milk fed calves.Bangladesh J. of Livestock Res. 19(1-2): 33-43, Jan-Dec 2012
Article
Full-text available
Bu çalışmada Konya ili Ereğli ilçesinde hastalıklardan ari, modern bir süt sığırı işletmesindeki 536 baş Siyah Alaca dişi buzağı kullanılmıştır. Araştırmada doğum ağırlığı, 60. gün ağırlığı, 120. gün ağırlığı, doğum-60. gün arası dönemde günlük canlı ağırlık artışı, 60-120. gün arası GCAA ve doğum-120. gün arası GCAA değerlerine ait genel ortalamalar sırasıyla 37.94±4.38 kg, 77.34±5.71 kg, 123.58±9.92 kg, 0.622±0.044 kg, 0.768±0.179 kg ve 0.687±0.031 kg olarak tespit edilmiştir. Doğum ağırlığına doğum ayı ve ana durumunun etkisi P<0.01 seviyesinde; 60. gün ağırlığına doğum ayının P<0.05 düzeyinde; 120. gün ağırlığına ana durumunun P<0.05 düzeyinde; doğum-60. gün arası dönemde günlük canlı ağırlık artışına doğum yılının P<0.01 düzeyinde; 60-120. gün arası dönemde günlük canlı ağırlık artışına doğum ayının P<0.05 düzeyinde; doğum-120. gün arası günlük canlı ağırlık artışına doğum ayı ve doğum yılının P<0.01 düzeyinde önemli etkisi bulunmuştur.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.