BookPDF Available

African perspectives on tradition and justice

Authors:

Abstract

This volume aims to produce a better understanding of the relationship between tradition and justice in Africa. It presents contributions of six African scholars related to current international discourses on access to justice and human rights and on the localisation of transitional justice. The contributions suggest that access to justice and appropriate, context-specific transitional justice strategies need to consider diversity and legal pluralism. In this sense, they all stress that dialogical approaches are the way forward. Whether it is in the context of legal reforms, transitional processes in post-war societies or the promotion of human rights in general, all contributors accentuate that it is by means of cooperation, conversation and cross-fertilization between different legal realities that positive achievements can be realized. The contributions in this book illustrate the perspectives on this dialectal process from those operating on the ground, and more specifically form Sierra Leone, Mozambique, Malawi, South-Africa, Uganda and Rwanda,. Obviously, the contributions in this volume do not provide the final outcome of the debate. Rather, they are part of it.
AFRICAN PERSPECTIVES ON
TRADITION AND JUSTICE
Edited by
Tom B
Eva B
Giselle C
Lia N
Martien S
Cambridge – Antwerp – Portland
African Perspectives on Tradition and Justice
Tom Bennett, Eva Brems, Giselle Corradi, Lia Nijzink and Martien Schotsmans
(ed s.)
© 2012 Intersentia
Cambridge – Antwerp – Portland
www.intersentia.com | ww w.intersentia.co.uk
Cover photo: People gossip and smoke waiting for the sun to come out, Chencha
Village, Southern Ethiopia (© Marcin Bartosz Czarnoleski/Dreamstime.com)
ISBN 978-1-78068-059-0
NUR 828
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data. A catalogue record for this book is
available from the British Library.
No part of this book may be reproduced in any form, by print, photoprint, micro lm or any
other means, without written permission from the publisher.
Distribution for the UK:
Hart Publishing Ltd.
16C Worcester Place
Oxford OX1 2JW
UK
Tel.: +44 1865 517 530
Email: mail@hartpub.co.uk
Distribution for Austria:
Neuer Wissenscha licher Verlag
Argentinierstraße 42/6
1040 Wien
Austria
Tel.: +43 1 535 61 03 24
Email: o ce@nwv.at
Distribution for the USA and Canada:
International Specialized Book Services
920 NE 58th Ave. Suite 300
Portland, OR 97213
USA
Tel.: +1 800 944 6190 (toll free)
Email: info@isbs.com
Distribution for other countries:
Intersentia Publishing nv
Groenstraat 31
2640 Mortsel
Belgium
Tel.: +32 3 680 15 50
Email: mail@intersentia.be
Intersentia Publishing Ltd.
Trinity House | Cambridge Business Park | Cowley Road
Cambridge | CB4 0WZ | United Kingdom
Tel.: +44 1223 393 753 | Email: mail@intersentia.co.uk
Intersentia v
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
is publication was completed in the framework of the research project
Addressing Traditional Law in Post-Con ict Legal and Judicial Development
Aid in sub-Saharan Africa’, with the  nancial support of the Belgian Ministry of
Science Policy within its programme ‘Society and Future’ 2007 [TA/00/17
AFTRALAW].  e editors wish to express their gratitude to the programme
administrators, Mrs. Margarida Freire, and her predecessor, Mrs. Zakia Khattabi,
for their enthusiastic support to the project.  ey also wish to thank Dr. Marleen
Renders for her role in designing the research project and the members of the
Scienti c Support Committee for their valuable inputs and critical comments as
the project moved on: Mrs. Lara Deramaix, Prof. Marie-Claire Foblets, Mr.
Renaud Galand, Prof. Em. Luc Huyse, Mr. Robert Olbrechts, Prof. Barbara
Oomen, Mr. Dick Oosting, Prof. Stephan Parmentier, Prof. Filip Reyntjens, Mrs.
Heidy Rombouts, Dr. Stef Vandeginste, Mr. Marc Van Wymeersch and Mr.
Pierre Vincke.  e authors of the chapters especially deserve our thanks for
accepting our invitation to contribute to the volume and for addressing our
comments and adjusting their chapters accordingly. Finally, our thanks are due
to the University of Cape Town for the organization of the international forum
‘Traditional Justice and the Role of External Actors in sub-Saharan Africa’ in
March 2010, which planted the seeds out of which this publication grew.
Intersentia vii
CONTENTS
Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v
About the authors and editors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xi
Chapter I. Introduction
Giselle C and Martien S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1. Background to the Volume . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
2. Historical context and current approaches . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2.1. Traditional justice and development in Africa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2.2.  e localisation of transitional justice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.  e contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
4. Common themes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Bibliography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Chapter II. Access to justice and human rights in the traditional courts of
sub-Saharan Africa
Tom B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
2.  e traditional African style of justice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
3. Due process of law . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
4. Equal treatment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
5. Rights in criminal proceedings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
5.1.  e civil/criminal distinction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
5.2. Due process in criminal proceedings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
5.3.  e presumption of innocence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
5.4. Legal representation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
6. Access to justice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
7. Conclusion – And the right to culture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
Bibliography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
Chapter III. Courts and the application of customary law in Malawi:
Towards the reintroduction of local courts
Kenan Tilombe M . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
2. Historical background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
Contents
viii Intersentia
3.  e structure of the Malawi court system since 1994 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
4.  e application of customary law . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
4.1. Problems in the magistrate courts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
4.2. Developing customary law jurisprudence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
5.  e recommendations of the Malawi Law Commission . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
5.1.  e structure and positioning of the new local courts . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
5.2. Presiding o cers and assessors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
5.3. Jurisdiction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
6. Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
Bibliography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
Chapter IV. Powers, rights and citizenship:  e ‘return’ of the traditional
authorities in Mozambique
Maria Paula G. M . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
2. Tradition, between the past and the future . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68
3. Civilization, culture and citizenship in the colonial context . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
3.1. Nationality and citizenship: toughening the abyssal line . . . . . . . . . . 72
3.2. Highlights of colonial administrative reforms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
4. Old and new actors in the political fabric of independent Mozambique . . 78
4.1. Amplifying the plural network of justices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79
4.2.  e return of ‘old’ actors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
5. Contemporary political implications of legal pluralism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87
Bibliography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
Chapter V. Traditional justice and human rights in post-war African
countries: Prospects and challenges
Joe A.D. A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95
2. Confronting the justice challenge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96
3. Is traditional justice the answer? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98
4. Characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101
5.  e human rights question . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106
6.  e Sierra Leone con ict . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109
7. Justice and reconciliation from below . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111
7.1. Reintegration and reconciliation of ex-combatants . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112
7.2. Community reconciliation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113
7.3. Philosophical expressions that are germane to the reconciliation
process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115
Contents
Intersentia ix
8. Conclusion: e future of traditional justice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116
Bibliography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117
Chapter VI. Reinventing and validating the cosmology and ontology of
restorative justice: Hermeneutics of the traditional Acholi justice system in
Northern Uganda
Daniel K . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121
1. Rationale of the study: Contextualizing the assumptions and traits
of justice in transitional justice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121
1.1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121
1.2.  e thesis and outline of the chapter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122
1.3. Central argument . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122
1.4. Methodology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123
2. Live and let live: A critique of dominant modernist justice in
transitional justice discourse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124
2.1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124
2.2.  e modernist critique of tradition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124
2.3.  e modernist epistemology and retributive justice . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126
2.4.  e ICC and retributive justice in the Northern Uganda armed
con ict . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128
3.  e resurgence of the traditional justice system in Northern Uganda . . . 130
3.1.  e notion of tradition in the Acholi community . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130
3.2. Reconstructing and validating tradition: A hermeneutics . . . . . . . . 131
3.3. Acholi cosmology and ontology: Tempels’ framework . . . . . . . . . . . 132
3.4. Cosmology and ontology among the Acholi of Uganda . . . . . . . . . . 133
3.5.  e ontological hierarchy – Reconciliation and restoration in
Acholi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135
4. Acholi traditional justice and human rights . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137
4.1. Acholi understanding of human rights . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137
4.1.1.  e Acholi concept of rights being natural and
communal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138
4.1.2. Duty and responsibility in human rights . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139
5. Reliving Acholi traditional justice mechanisms: Plant Acholi in
an Acholi garden . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140
5.1.  e Acholi concept of dano as a framework for reconciliation . . . . 140
5.2. Justice and systemic thinking: Returning the ICC to the
classroom . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142
6. Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144
Bibliography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145
Contents
x Intersentia
Chapter VII. Revisiting the legal and socio-political foundations and (Western)
criticisms of gacaca courts
Felix Mukwiza N and Alphonse M . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149
2. Legal and socio-political underpinnings of gacaca courts
2.1. Prosecuting genocide cases in post-genocide Rwanda . . . . . . . . . . . 152
2.2. Motivations for the establishment of the gacaca courts . . . . . . . . . . 154
2.2.1. Socio-legal dimensions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155
2.2.2. Socio-political considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156
2.2.3. Socio-cultural motivations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159
3. (Western) criticisms of gacaca courts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160
3.1. Non-inclusion of RPF/A crimes in the gacaca process . . . . . . . . . . . 161
3.2. Non-compliance with due process guarantees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 165
3.3. Lack of judicial independence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 166
4. Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 168
Bibliography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 168
... Многие коренные культуры во всем мире имели правовые системы, основанные на медиации, реституции и восстановлении, например, китайское племя и-цзин [66, с. 61], маори [67], африканские племена [68,69], североамериканские индейцы [70][71][72]. При этом имеются и те, что основаны на возмездии; самой известной из них является группа племен Яномамо, исследованная Н. Шаньоном [73]. ...
... В такой системе потерпевшие, в первую очередь дети, остаются безгласными. Потенциальная возможность реабилитации потерпевших определила использование восстановительных подходов в комиссиях по примирению сторон [69]. Расширение взглядов западной культуры в сторону принципов восстановительного правосудия делает эти подходы более гибкими, готовыми к переменам, а значит, и более сильными. ...
Article
Full-text available
Objective to analyze the history formation and development of restorative justice mediation. Methods the dialectic approach to the cognition of social phenomena which allows to analyze them in their historical development and functioning in the context of the unity of objective and subjective factors determined the choice of research methods formallogical comparativelegal and sociological. Results this article provides an overview of the main themes and controversies in the restorative justice discussions in Europe and the US with special attention to the role of victims and mediators. This discussion is contextualized through a short description of the history of both statecentered and communityoriented restorative systems in response to law violation. Indigenous and prestate formation responses to crime have predominantly been of a restorative nature with the interest in healing the harm experienced by all participants with the aim of addressing social problems and strengthening the community as a whole. nbsp Scientific novelty for the first time the article proves that at the outset mediation was established to help victims it was intended to offer them a possibility for some resolution after experiences of victimization and opportunities for restitution of the damages. The meanwhile broad research results show clearly that this aim can be reached if this measure is practised professionally. Most victims find that they benefit from participation in mediation they have a better chance to overcome the emotional and material damage caused by the crime than in traditional penal procedures. Practical significance the main provisions and conclusions of the article can be used in scientific andnbsp educational activity when considering the issues of the essence content and functioning of restorative justice mediation.
... Human rights violations against indigenous populations, in other cases, have been the product of the systematic inequality, oppression, and discriminatory policies that the ethnic communities endure in the continent (inter alia, lack of access to health services, denial of justice). Examples of this are cases from Ecuador, Paraguay, and México (Beristain, 2010; Valencia, 2011). ...
... This is where legal scholars often fail. The few existing non-legal studies (Beristain, 2010; Donoso, 2009; Guillis, 2005) have already revealed that reparation processes often do not include victims' psychosocial and cultural values in the design and execution of reparative measures, or do not consistently evaluate the impact of reparative measures (Beristain, 2006; Hamber, 2008) Psychosocial intervention should have a main role, it is the appropriate instrument, along with other dynamic restoration processes of the social fabric, which allows opening a space to know the truth, build group solidarity and options to improve a social environment often deteriorated. The main intervention from the first moment must be the psychosocial. ...
Article
Full-text available
Reparations for victims and survivors of severe human rights violations are a challenging field. It is during this process that victims often place their hopes of finding justice and redress. However, victims’ voices are frequently unheard and secondary victimization during proceedings is recurrent. In general, legal and social institutions are limited to a repair the irreparable. In Latin-America, but in many other places, this complexity has been even more intricate when the ethnic component is part of the scenario. Cultural differences are usually unidentified or overlooked. Psychosocial interventions and mental health care in cross-cultural reparation processes for human rights violations may contribute to redress victims and communities comprehensively. However, they face a number of epistemological and practical shortcomings (e.g. lack of interdisciplinary policies) that will be explored along the document. For this purpose, paradigmatic indigenous cases from the Inter-American Court of Human Rights are examined. Finally, I will argue that a more interdisciplinary research and practice combining law with social psychology and anthropology can innovatively advise policy makers in the global human rights area. Effective and adequate cross-cultural psychosocial processes, although they cannot ensure successful trial outcomes for victims, may still contribute to the victims’ recovery by promoting self-agency and sensitiveness.
... The research focuses on 'international development actors', i.e. multilateral and bilateral assistance agencies, development banks, United Nations agencies, international nongovernmental organizations, international consultancy firms and international foundations in their roles as donors, implementers, technical advisors and stakeholders in policy dialogue. The focus on international actors is justified by the fact that in recent years these actors seem to have shifted their position towards local legal orders, i.e. from ignoring and condemning them as part of the problem of underdevelopment in the justice sector to embracing them as part of the solution for improving access to justice for the poor (Corradi and Schotsmans 2012). But human rights assistance, and aid to the justice sector in general, entail a chain involving multiple links between international and domestic development actors (ICHRP 2000). ...
Article
Full-text available
This dissertation examines the role of justice sector aid in sub-Saharan Africa regarding the relationship between human rights and local legal orders from a normative and empirical point of view. At the normative level, it explores how socio-legal theory on legal pluralism and human rights’ cross-contextual implementation may inform the practice of development actors in the justice sector. Based on case studies in Sierra Leone and Mozambique, the research applies this body of knowledge to the analysis of empirical data on development actors’ policies and interventions. The conclusion argues that the following issues deserve particular attention: the adoption of a users’ perspective regarding which local justice providers are targeted by policies and interventions, consideration of how different modes of dispute processing relate to the implementation of human rights, engagement with local knowledge and a critical approach to human rights cross- contextual application. Key words: Justice sector aid, human rights, access to justice, legal pluralism, customary legal orders, Sierra Leone, Mozambique
Chapter
This chapter develops the central argument of the book. It proposes an African legal philosophy from a relational community ideal as a plausible and attractive way of defining disability justice. It argues that, although Africa’s rich customary and pluralist legal and intellectual heritage provides the most obvious foundation on which to define African legal philosophy, they are too heterogeneous and inherently descriptive to ground disability justice in necessary, sufficient, normative, general and universal terms. After demonstrating the difficulty with defining disability justice through Africa’s customary and pluralist heritage, the chapter outlines and defends a relational community conception of the ideal. Conceived as an African legal philosophy of disability justice, the proposal is offered as an alternative criterion for evaluating, criticising and modifying existing legal and political institutions, as well as for creating new ones to include and respond to the needs and dependencies of people with disabilities within the diverse communities across Africa.
Chapter
Since the early 1990s, Africa has served as a vast testing ground for new policies to address impunity, seek truth and justice, and enable reconciliation in fractured societies. Although the results of these accountability efforts have been mixed and uneven, African experiences have contributed to advancing a plethora of domestic and international transitional justice initiatives. Africa’s response to justice mirrors the upheavals of Latin America, which also suffered from false starts and political manipulation before building innovative and dynamic accountability mechanisms. Approaches have ranged from judicial mechanisms, such as international tribunals, hybrid courts, and domestic trials, to non-judicial mechanisms like truth commissions, reparations, and traditional or community-based processes.
Chapter
Wie kaum ein anderer Kontinent hat Afrika sich seit 1994 zu einem Labor von Transitional Justice (TJ) entwickelt. Dabei standen unterschiedliche Typen von Konflikt ebenso wie verschiedenartige Kombinationen von TJ-Politiken im Vordergrund. Empirisch konzentrieren sich die Erfahrungen auf Wahrheits- und Versöhnungskommissionen, nationale wie internationale Untersuchungskommissionen sowie internationale Strafgerichtshöfe. Jüngst dominieren einerseits Versuche der AU-Kommission, verbindliche TJ-Standards für die AU-Mitgliedsstaaten zu entwickeln, und andererseits die Politik, eine Strafverfolgung von Amtsinhabern durch den Internationalen Strafgerichtshof (ICC) zu verhindern. Since the early 1990s, Africa has served as a vast testing ground for new policies to address impunity, seek truth and justice, and enable reconciliation in fractured societies. Although the results of these accountability efforts have been mixed and uneven, African experiences have contributed to advancing a plethora of domestic and international transitional justice initiatives. Africa’s response to justice mirrors the upheavals of Latin America, which also suffered from false starts and political manipulation before building innovative and dynamic accountability mechanisms. Approaches have ranged from judicial mechanisms, such as international tribunals, hybrid courts, and domestic trials, to non-judicial mechanisms like truth commissions, reparations, and traditional or community-based processes. (AU Panel of the Wise 2013, S. 27).
Access to justice and human rights in the traditional courts of sub-Saharan
  • Tom Chapter Africa
  • ................................................. Bennett
Chapter II. Access to justice and human rights in the traditional courts of sub-Saharan Africa Tom Bennett................................................... 19
28 5.2. Due process in criminal proceedings
  • Criminal Proceedings......................................................................................................................................... Rights In
Rights in criminal proceedings..................................... 28 5.1. Th e civil/criminal distinction................................. 28 5.2. Due process in criminal proceedings.......................... 31 5.3. Th e presumption of innocence................................ 32 5.4. Legal representation......................................... 33
Courts and the application of customary law in Malawi: Towards the reintroduction of local courts Kenan Tilombe Manda
  • Chapter
Chapter III. Courts and the application of customary law in Malawi: Towards the reintroduction of local courts Kenan Tilombe Manda........................................... 47
51 4.1. Problems in the magistrate courts
  • .................................................................................. Th E Application Of Customary Law
Th e application of customary law................................... 51 4.1. Problems in the magistrate courts............................. 51 4.2. Developing customary law jurisprudence....................... 54
Th e 'return' of the traditional authorities in Mozambique Maria
  • Chapter Paula
  • G Meneses
Chapter IV. Powers, rights and citizenship: Th e 'return' of the traditional authorities in Mozambique Maria Paula G. Meneses.......................................... 67
72 3.1. Nationality and citizenship: toughening the abyssal line 72 3.2. Highlights of colonial administrative reforms
  • ..................................... Civilization
Civilization, culture and citizenship in the colonial context............ 72 3.1. Nationality and citizenship: toughening the abyssal line.......... 72 3.2. Highlights of colonial administrative reforms................... 75
111 7.1. Reintegration and reconciliation of ex-combatants 113 7.3. Philosophical expressions that are germane to the reconciliation process
  • Reconciliation From Below............................................................................................................................ Justice
Justice and reconciliation from below.............................. 111 7.1. Reintegration and reconciliation of ex-combatants............. 112 7.2. Community reconciliation.................................. 113 7.3. Philosophical expressions that are germane to the reconciliation process.................................................... 115
124 2.2. Th e modernist critique of tradition
  • Let Live
  • ........................................................................................................... Live Justice Discourse
Live and let live: A critique of dominant modernist justice in transitional justice discourse...................................... 124 2.1. Introduction............................................... 124 2.2. Th e modernist critique of tradition........................... 124 2.3. Th e modernist epistemology and retributive justice............. 126 2.4. Th e ICC and retributive justice in the Northern Uganda armed confl ict................................................... 128
132 3.4. Cosmology and ontology among the Acholi of 133 3.5. Th e ontological hierarchy – Reconciliation and restoration in
  • Acholi Cosmology
  • .......... Uganda......... Acholi.................................................. Tempels 'framework
Acholi cosmology and ontology: Tempels' framework........... 132 3.4. Cosmology and ontology among the Acholi of Uganda.......... 133 3.5. Th e ontological hierarchy – Reconciliation and restoration in Acholi.................................................... 135
137 4.1. Acholi understanding of human rights 137 4.1.1. Th e Acholi concept of rights being natural and communal
  • Acholi
  • Human Rights....................................................................................... Justice
Acholi traditional justice and human rights......................... 137 4.1. Acholi understanding of human rights........................ 137 4.1.1. Th e Acholi concept of rights being natural and communal.......................................... 138