Introduction: Transurethral needle ablation of the prostate (TUNA) is used to deliver low-level radiofrequency through a catheter device equipped with adjustable needles placed in selected prostatic tissue areas. TUNA ablation produces necrosis by heating tissue to 110 °C. The objectives of this study were to determine the clinical efficacy of TUNA for the treatment of symptomatic BPH and to compare it with TURP. Patients and methods: From April 1994 to May 1996, 51 patients (mean age 66.2 years, range 58-71; mean prostatic weight 53.3 g. range 25-85) were treated using TUNA; 51 patients of similar age and prostatic weight underwent TURP. The assessment variables were the IPSS, quality-of-life, uroflow, post-void residual volume (PVR), TRUS, urine culture and measurements of PSA and creatinine. Results: The values at various times after treatment were as given in the table. TUNA [mean (SD)] TURP [mean (SD)] Follow-up 0 6 12 24 0 6 12 24 (months) IPSS 20.3 11.7 12.0 5.4 32.0 5.2 7.3 3.8 (7) (8) (8) (4) (4) (4) (3) (1) QOL 4.6 2.6 2.8 1.8 5.1 2.3 1.6 1.5 (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) Qmax (mL/s) 7.8 13.6 13.8 14.4 7.0 23.6 28.1 27.1 (3) (5) (4) (4) (3) (5) (4) (4) PVR (mL) 166 92 80 32 130 30 35 40 (105) (149) (99) (15) (90) (45) (40) (10) PSA(ng/mL) 5.1 4.7 4.7 4.2 5.6 1.2 1.2 1.3 No ejaculatory dysfunction was reported after TUNA, compared with 68% after TURP, and no blood transfusion was required after TUNA, compared with 24% after TURP. The mean hospital stay was 1.2 days after TUNA and 3.5 days after TURP. Short-term failure occurred in 2% after TUNA. Conclusions: In our experience, TUNA produced minimal morbidity with no serious complications. At 24 months, patient satisfaction was comparable in both groups.