Introduction:
Double poling is one of the main sub-techniques in classical cross-country skiing and has gained increased scientific interest over the last two decades. In modern skiing competitions, double poling is more frequently used than previously and events such as sprint and mass start races are often decided while double poling in the final sprint (Sandbakk & Holmberg, 2014). The propulsion during double poling depends highly on the upper body, with the generated force being transferred through the ski poles. Hereby, the involved muscles are working in sequential order, with the trunk and hip flexors being activated first, followed by shoulder and elbow extensors (Holmberg, Lindinger, Stöggl, Eitzlmair, & Müller, 2005). The trunk segment of the body as part of this chain plays a crucial role in the power production during double poling (Hegge et al., 2015) and increased lean and muscle mass located in the trunk appears to be advantageous for reaching a high maximal speed in this technique (Stöggl, Enqvist, Müller, & Holmberg, 2010). In addition, hip flexion velocity is associated with double poling performance (Holmberg et al., 2005) and locomotor and respiratory movements in the corresponding trunk musculature are also closely linked in double poling (Lindinger & Holmberg, 2011). Exercise induced fatigue is a complex phenomenon, encompassing physiological, biomechanical and psychological elements (Seghers & Spaepen, 2004), being particularly important in the technical endurance sport of cross-country skiing (Stöggl, Lindinger, & Muller, 2007). Zory, Vuillerme, Pellegrini, Schena, & Rouard (2009) demonstrated lower peak speed as well as reduced hip flexion and hip flexion velocity during double poling in skiers, after the completion of several sprint races in the classical technique. Such intense whole body exercise is expected to fatigue many inter-related aspects influencing performance. The isolated effects of each component is less understood. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the acute effects of fatigued trunk musculature on trunk strength and double poling performance in competitive cross-country skiers.
Methods:
16 male junior cross-country skiers (mean ± SD; age = 19.1 ± 2.6 years, body height = 177 ± 6 cm, body mass = 69 ± 7 kg, running VO2max = 62.2 ± 6.9 ml/kg/min) of regional to national level completed two identical pre- and post-tests on separate days in a randomized, controlled cross-over design. The pre- and post-test were separated by either a 25-min fatiguing exercise sequence targeting the ventral and dorsal core musculature, or a control condition consisting of 25 min rest. After a 10-min unspecific and a 5-min specific warm-up, the pre-test consisted of a maximal isometric trunk flexion and extension strength test on the IsoMed 2000 Back Module (D&R Ferstl GmbH) and a 3-min self-paced double poling performance test on a Concept2 Skierg (Concept2, Morrisville, VT, USA). The post-test procedure was identical except for a repeated warm-up, which was missing in the fatigue condition. Subjects were familiarized with the testing equipment and exercise protocols on a separate day prior to the experimental test days. For the 3-min test, power output and cycle rate were continuously recorded using a Microsoft ActiveX software component to extract data live into a spreadsheet (Excel, Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA). Heart rate and respiratory variables were continuously measured during the test and blood lactate concentration was assessed prior and 1 min after the test. All data were checked for normality using a Shapiro-Wilk test and are presented as mean ± SD. A two-way repeated measures ANOVA was performed. Potential interaction effects between fatigue condition and time were identified using a Bonferroni post-hoc test.
Results:
Isometric peak torque during trunk flexion decreased considerably from 141 ± 41 to 56 ± 20 Nm pre to post fatigue (mean difference: -85 Nm; 95% CI -104 to -66 Nm; p < 0.001) and remained nearly unchanged in the control condition (mean difference: 3.6 Nm; 95% CI -1.0 to -8.1 Nm; p = 0.12). Corresponding peak torque in extension decreased from 288 ± 78 to 256 ± 80 Nm (mean difference: -32 Nm; 95% CI -49 to -15 Nm; p < 0.001) and also did not relevantly change in the control condition (mean difference: -6.9 Nm; 95% CI -25 to 11 Nm; p = 0.42). Main outcomes for the 3-min double poling tests are shown in Table 1. Mean power output (p < 0.001), cycle rate (p < 0.001), peak oxygen uptake (p = 0.004) and peak ventilation (p < 0.001) decreased considerably from pre to post fatigue.
Discussion:
The acute fatiguing of the core musculature in junior cross-country skiers resulted in a substantial decrease in peak trunk flexion and extension torque (60 and 11%, respectively). This was accompanied by a 13% decrease in power production and reduced average cycle rate (10%), average work per cycle (4%), peak oxygen uptake (4%) and peak ventilation (7%) in the double poling test. Since the trunk plays an essential role in both the poling and repositioning phase, fatigued trunk muscles have potentially slowed down the cycle rate and decreased the work done in the poling phase. In addition, fatigued trunk musculature not only influenced performance characteristics in double poling, but had also an impact on physiological processes. For example, the relatively large decrease in peak oxygen uptake and peak ventilation caused by trunk fatigue in the current study may originate from weaker contractions in respiratory muscles during trunk flexion (poling phase) and the corresponding extension (recovery phase). This highlights the close tie between breathing and the execution of the movement in cross-country skiing, with potential implications for other whole-body endurance exercises as well. Further biomechanical analyses of muscle fatigue using surface electromyography in core muscles, could reveal changes in activation patterns during complex movements such as double poling.