The Middle Jurassic Tuwaiq Mountain Formation (TMF; formed of three members, from bottom to top T1, T2, and T3) represents one of the primary conventional and unconventional reservoirs to be assessed in Saudi Arabia. It is considered as a tight carbonate reservoir in the Jafurah Basin and conventional reservoir in the Ghawar Mega-field. Here, we investigate the depositional, diagenetic, and stratigraphic impact on reservoir quality and porosity evolution of the TMF through an integrated petrographical, geochemical and petrophysical analyses on outcrop samples.
The TMF has a complex-diagenetic-history including micritization, dissolution, recrystallization and neomorphism, meteoric-cementation, evaporite-precipitation, dolomitization, silicification, dolomite-dissolution and calcitization.
Dolomitization occurred via a hypersaline-fluid mechanism, based on texture, association with evaporites, and Sr concentration. X-ray diffraction results support chert-replacing-evaporite as the mechanism of the two chert beds in the T3 due to the presence of anhydrite relics in their samples. This replacement formed the necessary Ca²⁺ rich fluid for dolomite dissolution and calcitization. Therefore, Dolomite calcitization occurs locally and is stratigraphically controlled based on its position relative to chert beds in T3. T3 and upper part of T2 contain calcitized dolomites, while lower part of T2 and T1 contain only dissolved dolomite. As the fluid went deeper in the TMF, it became weaker. Therefore, the fluid was too weak to develop dolomite-calcitization process and instead of that it only affected T1 and lower part of T2 by dolomite dissolution. Overall, dolomite-dissolution and dolomite-calcitization didn't have a high impact on porosity evolution from T1 to T2 and T3 as the TMF isn't a highly dolomitized formation.
The distribution of ø, K, and reservoir-quality-index (RQI) of the TMF are stratigraphically controlled. The TMF represents a regressive system tract of 3rd order depositional sequence, which is composed of seven 4th order cycles (i.e. deep lagoon cycles (DLC) and shallow lagoon cycles (SLC)). RQI, Ø, and K plots showed great fitting with the 4th order depositional-cycles as DLC had very-poor reservoir-properties (average ø = 7.7%, average K = 0.17 mD, average RQI = 0.03), while SLC had fair reservoir-properties (average ø = 15.4%, average K = 2.64 mD, average RQI = 0.11). Reservoir-quality contrast is controlled by two-factors: (1) the reduced mud-content and increased grain-content in SLC compared with DLC are governed by the increase in the depositional-energy which increased the primary-interparticle-porosity, (2) the higher primary-interparticle-porosity in SLCs compared with DLCs preferentially facilitated more infiltration of undersaturated-meteoric-fluids, resulting in enhanced grain dissolution. This is reflected on the higher proportion of moldic and vuggy porosity in SLCs compared with DLCs. The accurate assessment of the TMF micro-scale attributes and controls on an outcrop analogue in a close proximity to the subsurface intervals can provide important input for appraisal and enhanced oil recovery performance.