Available via license: CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Content may be subject to copyright.
Eects of forward head posture on forced vital
capacity and respiratory muscles activity
Jintae Han, PT, PhD
1)
, SooJin Park, PT, PhD
1)*
, YoungJu kim
2)
, YeonSung CHoi
1)
,
HYeon nam LYu
1)
1)
Department of Physical Therapy, College of Science, Kyungsung University: 309 Suyeong-ro,
Nam-gu, Busan 608-736, Republic of Korea
2)
Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School of Clinical Pharmacy and Health, Kyungsung
University, Republic of Korea
Abstract. [Purpose] This study investigated the effects of forward head posture on forced vital capacity and deep
breathing. [Subjects] Twenty-six subjects, divided into the two groups (normal and forward head posture groups),
participated in this study. [Methods] Forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in 1 second were measured
using respiratory function instrumentation that met the American Thoracic Society’s recommendation for diagnos-
tic spirometry. Accessory respiratory muscle activity during deep breathing was measured by electromyography.
A Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the measure variables between the normal and forward head posture
group. [Results] Forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in 1 second were signicantly lower in the
forward head posture group than in the normal group. Accessory respiratory muscle activity was also lower in the
forward head posture group than in the normal group. In particular, the sternocleidomastoid and pectoralis major
activity of the forward head posture group was signicantly lower than that of normal group. Activities of the other
muscles were generally decreased with forward head posture, but were not signicantly different between the two
groups. [Conclusion] These results indicate that forward head posture could reduce vital capacity, possibly because
of weakness or disharmony of the accessory respiratory muscles.
Key words: Forward head posture, Forced vital capacity, Breathing muscle activity
(This article was submitted Aug. 28, 2015, and was accepted Oct. 14, 2015)
INTRODUCTION
In recent times in some occupations work in static sedentary postures for long hours in order to perform the tasks required
of them. This can cause continuous muscle contraction in the neck and shoulders, which subsequently leads most people to
adopt a forward head posture (FHP) in which their chins stick out
1)
.
When FHP is maintained for prolonged periods the neck exors and the erector spinae (ES) muscles in the upper thoracic
region are weakened due to their lengthening, and the scapula is elevated due to tension in the levator scapula, sternocleido-
mastoid (SCM), splenius muscles, and the suboccipitalis, which also causes tension in the upper trapezius (UT)
2)
. Therefore,
because of an imbalance in the muscles, such as the shortening or lengthening, or straining or loosening of the muscles
around the neck, a rounded shoulder posture is exhibited, in which the upper thoracic region is slightly bent while in a sitting
posture
3)
, and chronic neck pain results due to mechanical stress
1)
. These changes in muscle activity result from changes in
motor strategies to minimize the activities of muscles that are sensing pain and to compensate for these suppressed muscles
4)
.
In addition, FHP is known to have a large inuence on respiratory function by weakening the respiratory muscles
5, 6)
.
The SCM, scalene muscles, UT, pectoralis major (PM), and thoracolumbar ES muscles are important accessory respiratory
muscles involved in inspiration
7, 8)
and prolonged FHP weakens these muscles, thereby decreasing their respiratory function
7)
.
J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 28: 128–131, 2016
*Corresponding author. Soojin Park (E-mail: rememversj@hanmail.net)
©2016 The Society of Physical Therapy Science. Published by IPEC Inc.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd)
License <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/>.
Original Article
The Journal of Physical Therapy Science The Journal of Physical Therapy Science
129
Because of this, patients with FHP accompanied by chronic neck pain have been shown to have less respiratory muscle
strength than normal individuals
9)
and their accessory respiratory muscles are shortened, which largely affects their respira-
tory function
10)
. In addition, a study reported that FHP changes the alignment of the thoracic spine and rib cage due to a
slightly bent posture, thereby causing respiratory dysfunction
5)
.
However, most previous studies on this topic were conducted on patients with neck pain or on patients with neck pain
accompanied by FHP, whereas the number of studies that have identied the specic effects of just FHP on respiration is
limited. Therefore, this study measured the forced vital capacity (FVC) and the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)
in healthy normal adults and healthy adults with FHP to determine the effects of FHP on respiratory dysfunction. In addition,
the present study attempted to determine the relationship between FHP and accessory respiratory muscle activity by measur-
ing the activity of the SCM, UT, PM, and thoracolumbar ES muscles during deep breathing.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
Twenty-six subjects (14 males, 12 females) participated in this study. They were divided into the two groups: normal group
and FHP group. Because lung capacity and muscle activity differ between the genders
11)
, results between the normal and FHP
groups were compared separately for males and females. Before participation in this study, all subjects signed an informed
consent document that was approved by the Institute Research Board of Kyungsung University. FVC, FEV1, and accessory
respiratory muscle activity during deep breathing were measured for each group. To measure FVC and FEV1, the subjects are
asked to perform a rapid full inspiration through the mouthpiece and then, without hesitation, perform a full expiration with
maximum force, followed by another rapid maximum inspiration. FVC and FEV1 were measured using pulmonary function
equipment (Spiropalm, Cosmed, Italy) that met the American Thoracic Society’s recommendation for diagnostic spirometry.
An electromyography unit (Telemyo direct transmission system, Noraxon, USA) was used to measure the activity of
the following accessory respiratory muscles during deep breathing: SCM, UT, PM, and ES muscles. Data are expressed
as percentages of the reference voluntary contraction (% RVC). Muscle activity was measured during the inspiration and
expiration phases.
A Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the FVC, FEV1, and breathing muscle activity between the normal and FHP
group. SPSS software (version 21.0; SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) was used to generate the statistics, and p-values less than 0.05
were considered statistically signicant.
RESULTS
The characteristics of the subjects are shown in Table 1. The craniovertebral angle was signicantly different between
normal and FHP subjects in both males and females (p < 0.05 for both genders). FVC and FEV1 of the FHP group were
both signicantly lower than they were in the normal group, in both males and females (p < 0.05 for both genders) (Table 2).
Activity of the SCM and PM in the FHP group was signicantly lower than that of the normal group in males (p < 0.05).
Table 1. Subject characteristics (mean±SD)
Var iable
Group
Male (n=14) Female (n=12)
Normal (n=7) FHP (n=7) Normal (n=5) FHP (n=7)
Age (years) 23.3±2.2 24.2±3.6 22.8±0.3 23.2±2.8
Height (cm) 174.6±8.5 176.7±8.9 161.4±4.2 162.9±5.4
Weight (kg) 70.1±8.2 72.6±5.5 54.3±5.6 53.9±4.6
CVA (°) 53.1±2.3 40.9±4.0 55.4±2.1 43.1±2.5
SD: standard deviation, FHP: forward head posture, CVA: craniovertebral angle
Table 2. Comparisons of FVC and FEV1 between normal and FHP subjects (mean ± SD)
Var iable
Group
Male (n=14) Female (n=12)
Normal (n=7) FHP (n=7) Normal (n=5) FHP (n=7)
FVC 4.6±0.4 3.9±0.3* 3.2±0.2 2.7±0.4*
FEV1 4.5±0.4 3.6±0.4* 3.2±0.4 2.5±0.4*
*p < 0.05. SD: standard deviation, FHP: forward head posture, FVC: forced vital capacity, FEV1: forced expiratory
volume at 1 second
J. Phys. Ther. Sci. Vol. 28, No. 1, 2016
130
Activity of the UT and ES in the FHP group was generally lower than that of the normal group in men but the difference was
not signicant (p > 0.05) (Table 3). Activity of the SCM, PM, and UT in the FHP group was signicantly lower than that of
the normal group in women (p < 0.05). The activity of the ES in FHP group was generally lower than that of the normal group
in women but the difference was not signicant (p > 0.05) (Table 3).
DISCUSSION
The present study measured FVC and FEV1, as well as the muscular activity in the SCM, UT, PM, and ES muscles during
inspiration to identify the effects of FHP on vital capacity and the activity of the accessory respiratory muscles. The FHP
group showed statistically signicantly lower FVC and FEV1 levels than the normal group. In terms of the activity of the
accessory respiratory muscles, the FHP group also exhibited statistically signicant decreases in the activation of the SCM,
UT, and PM relative to muscle activation in the normal group. While the FHP group did not show a signicant decrease in
the ES muscle’s activity, its activity in this group was generally lower than in the normal group.
FHP causes shortening and weakening of the accessory respiratory muscles, thereby decreasing the ratio of FEV1 to
FVC
10)
. Kapreli et al. reported that an increase in FHP resulted in a corresponding increase in respiratory dysfunction
6)
.
In addition, even among the subjects without neck pain, an increase in FHP led to a corresponding statistically signicant
decrease in vital capacity
3)
.
Dimitriadis et al. reported that maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressure showed statistically signicant decreases
for complex reasons, such as weaknesses of the SCM, scalene muscles, and the trapezius, which are accessory respiratory
muscles, and a reduction in kinetic control of the cervical area
9)
. In addition, Wirth et al. reported that weaknesses of the
neck muscles and accessory respiratory muscles in patients with neck pain resulted in a decline in thoracic mobility, thereby
decreasing maximal voluntary ventilation, maximal inspiratory pressure, and maximal expiratory pressure, and that these
effects were closely related to FHP
12)
. However, some studies reported that an increase in FHP resulted in a corresponding
increase in maximal expiratory pressure
6, 9)
. This result may be explained as follows: while FHP represents an abnormal
posture, this posture can increase the trunk’s internal pressure during expiration and therefore may increase dynamic mecha-
nisms. In the present study, the observed decrease in FEV1 may have been due to increased kyphosis in the upper thoracic
region, which is characterized by FHP, causing a reduction in the volume of the thoracic cage. This would not only reduce
the expiratory reserve volume, but also create resistance to the exhalation.
In general, respiration is an activity inuenced by complex biomechanical factors and the stability of the cervical and
thoracic regions of the spine is of great importance to smooth respiratory function
5)
. However, FHP causes the shortening and
weakening of the SCM, scalene muscles, trapezius, and ES muscles
7)
, and therefore, reduces the endurance and propriocep-
tion of these muscles
5)
. In addition, FHP increases muscle tension around the thoracic spine, thereby restricting the range of
motion in the upper thoracic spine
3)
.
The present study compared normal adults without neck pain based on the presence or absence of FHP. The results were
similar to those of a number of previous studies on patients with FHP and neck pain, as well as those of the previous studies
on normal adults with FHP but without neck pain
3)
. The results presented here may be important in conrming that FHP
without neck pain can still inuence respiration. Therefore, when treating patients with FHP or lung dysfunction, improve-
ments in respiratory function through the correction of posture and the strengthening of weakened accessory respiratory
muscles may be clinically important.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This work was supported by the Brain Busan 21 Project in 2015.
Table 3. Comparisons of respiratory muscle activity between normal and FHP subjects (mean ± SD)
Var iable
Group
Male (n=14) Female (n=12)
Normal (n=7) FHP (n=7) Normal (n=5) FHP (n=7)
SCM 816.6±350.0 353.3±192.0* 1,243.6±762.2 514.2±123.0*
UT 273.2 ±114.3 177.5±39.7 596.6±350.6 244.8±103.0*
PM 274.8±95.7 183.6±39.4* 290.8±68.2 200.3±67.9*
ES 197.1±71.3 184.2±37.4 229.0±82.5 171.1±53.9
*p < 0.05. SD: standard deviation, FHP: forward head posture, SCM: sternocleidomastoid, UT: upper trapezius, PM:
pectoralis major, ES: erector spinae
131
REFERENCES
1) Chiu TT, Ku WY, Lee MH, et al.: A study on the prevalence of and risk factors for neck pain among university aca-
demic staff in Hong Kong. J Occup Rehabil, 2002, 12: 77–91. [Medline] [CrossRef]
2) Cagnie B, Cools A, De Loose V, et al.: Differences in isometric neck muscle strength between healthy controls and
women with chronic neck pain: the use of a reliable measurement. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2007, 88: 1441–1445. [Med-
line] [CrossRef]
3) Lee YM, Gong WT, Kim BK: Correlation between cervical lordosis, vital capacity, T-spine ROM and equilibrium. J
Phys Ther Sci, 2011, 23: 103–105. [CrossRef]
4) Falla D: Unravelling the complexity of muscle impairment in chronic neck pain. Man Ther, 2004, 9: 125–133. [Med-
line] [CrossRef]
5) Kapreli E, Vourazanis E, Strimpakos N: Neck pain causes respiratory dysfunction. Med Hypotheses, 2008, 70: 1009–
1013. [Medline] [CrossRef]
6) Kapreli E, Vourazanis E, Billis E, et al.: Respiratory dysfunction in chronic neck pain patients. A pilot study. Cepha-
lalgia, 2009, 29: 701–710. [Medline] [CrossRef]
7) Lee MH, Chu M: Correlation between craniovertebral angle (CVA) and cardiorespiratory function in young adults. J
Korean Soc Phys Med, 2014, 9: 107–113. [CrossRef]
8) Legrand A, Schneider E, Gevenois PA, et al.: Respiratory effects of the scalene and sternomastoid muscles in humans.
J Appl Physiol 1985, 2003, 94: 1467–1472. [Medline] [CrossRef]
9) Dimitriadis Z, Kapreli E, Strimpakos N, et al.: Respiratory weakness in patients with chronic neck pain. Man Ther,
2013, 18: 248–253. [Medline] [CrossRef]
10) Almeida VP, Guimarães FS, Moço VJ, et al.: [Correlation between pulmonary function, posture, and body composition
in patients with asthma]. Rev Port Pneumol, 2013, 19: 204–210. [Medline] [CrossRef]
11) Kim YM, Han JT, Park SH, et al.: The physical factors affecting on FVC, ERV, and MVV of Korean adults in their 20s.
J Phys Ther Sci, 2013, 25: 367–369. [CrossRef]
12) Wirth B, Amstalden M, Perk M, et al.: Respiratory dysfunction in patients with chronic neck pain—inuence of tho-
racic spine and chest mobility. Man Ther, 2014, 19: 440–444. [Medline] [CrossRef]