The Bug At Volkswagen: Lessons in Co-Determination, Ownership, and Board Structure

ArticleinJournal of Applied Corporate Finance 27(4):36-43 · December 2015with 161 Reads
Cite this publication
Abstract
Although the primary cause of the emissions scandal at Volkswagen appears to have been misfeasance and malfeasance on a corporate-wide scale, we argue that such a problematic culture existed at Volkswagen because of the composition of the board itself in combination with the unique governance structure known as “co-determination,” that defines many German companies, including VW. There are three major problems from a corporate governance standpoint with the Volkswagen board. First, is the interest-conflicting nature of the dual-class stock held by the dominant shareholding Porsche and Piech families. Second, is the presence of a government as a major shareholder. And third is the organization of its characteristically German “two-tier” board around the principle of co-determination, which mandated significant labor representation. We argue that each of these elements of the VW ownership and governance structure contributed in varying degrees to the board failure of oversight that led to the management decision to evade emissions regulations.

Do you want to read the rest of this article?

Request Full-text Paper PDF
  • Article
    Full-text available
    Abstrakti Liikeyritys on liberaalissa yhteiskunnassa taloudellinen toimija, jonka yhteiskunnalliset vastuut edistävät yrityksen keskeisten sidosryhmien taloudellista asemaa. Tämän taloudellisen yritysvastuukäsityksen taustalla on liberaali näkemys sopivasta moraalisesta työnjaosta julkisen ja yksityisen vastuun ja vallan välillä demokraattisessa markkinataloudessa. Liberaalissa poliittisessa traditiossa on kuitenkin ainakin kaksi merkittävää tulkintaa tästä työnjaosta, taloudellinen liberalismi ja liberalismin korkea traditio. Vallitseva yritysvastuukeskustelu perustuu vahvasti taloudellisen liberalismin oletuksen varaan. Ehdotamme, että liberalismin korkean tradition näkökulman huomioiminen voisi auttaa yritysvastuukeskustelua eräiden liberalismin nykytaloudessa kohtaamien haasteiden selvittämisessä.
  • Article
    Within the management and organization field, the internal audit function (IAF) plays an important role in enhancing good governance. Given the spate of corporate collapses over the last 20 years, this article draws on a multitheoretical approach to governance and a critical review of the published literature to identify where IAFs have failed, and to provide a new focus to strengthen their role. Common themes regarding monitoring gaps by IAFs were identified as occurring across three governance levels. A contributory cause for these gaps is the poor structural and functional arrangements of the IAF, arising from the considerable flexibility afforded in its setup and delivery of services. A negative consequence of this flexibility is the ability of the board and management to manipulate the role of the IAF to the extent that it is not aligned with the intention of its setup as encapsulated in its definition.
  • Article
    This article examines two transnational agreements signed by the Volkswagen European and Global Works Councils, considering their interlinked implementation within subsidiaries in Britain, Italy, Spain and Germany. We demonstrate differing stances and some uncertainty towards principles of co-management, social dialogue and codetermination. These agreements have improved local industrial relations and strengthened cross-national interaction between employee representatives, despite significant differences in orientation regarding how unions should engage with management. However, the emerging international framework has not led to a clear politics of incorporation, with local trade unions being well aware of the risks of co-management and a more business-oriented relationship.
  • Article
    Full-text available
    Justice is a core fundamental theme for individuals in organizations. This study suggests that believing that the world is just where one gets what one deserves, and deserves what one gets, is an important personal resource that helps maintain wellbeing at work. Further, it suggests that personal belief in a just world, but not general belief in a just world, exerts its influence on wellbeing through increasing overall justice perceptions of the work environment. Using two waves of data drawn from a large random sample of working adults in Switzerland, results showed that personal belief in a just world at time 1 indeed augmented perceptions of overall organizational justice, and this in turn increased job satisfaction and reduced work stress at time 2, i.e., one year later. As expected, this effect was only evident for personal and not general belief in a just world, highlighting personal belief in a just world as an important yet largely overlooked resource for the work context, and suggesting the need to consider individual’s beliefs about justice as drivers of overall organizational justice perceptions.
  • Article
    Justice is a core fundamental theme for individuals in organizations. This study suggests that believing the world is just where one gets what one deserves, and deserves what one gets, is an important personal resource that helps maintain well-being at work. Further, it suggests that personal belief in a just world, but not general belief in a just world, exerts its influence on well-being through increasing overall justice perceptions of the work environment. Using two waves of data drawn from a large random sample of working adults in Switzerland, results showed that personal belief in a just world at time 1 indeed augmented perceptions of overall organizational justice, and this in turn increased job satisfaction at time 2, that is, 1 year later. As expected, this effect was only evident for personal and not general belief in a just world, highlighting personal belief in a just world as an important yet largely overlooked resource for the work context, and suggesting the need to consider individual’s beliefs about justice as drivers of overall organizational justice perceptions.
  • Article
    Zusammenfassung Robert F. Göx gibt einen Überblick über die ökonomische Forschung zum Thema Managementvergütungen und erörtert anhand von Daten des Deutschen Aktienindexes (DAX) die Relevanz der überwiegend auf die Vereinigten Staaten fokussierten Forschung für die Entwicklung der Vorstandsvergütungen in Deutschland seit 1985. Dabei zeigt sich, dass diese im Wesentlichen von denselben Faktoren bestimmt wird wie in Amerika. Hinsichtlich der möglichen Ursachen des Anstiegs der Managementbezüge ergibt sich ein gemischtes Bild. Einerseits legen theoretische Argumente und empirische Befunde nahe, dass die Höhe der Vergütungen wesentlich durch die Unternehmensgröße und den finanziellen Erfolg determiniert ist. Andererseits gibt es aber auch eine Reihe von Anhaltspunkten für Ineffizienzen in der Gestaltung der Vergütung, deren Vermeidung wünschenswert erscheint. Allerdings deutet die jüngere Forschung zu den Konsequenzen einschlägiger staatlicher Maßnahmen darauf hin, dass eine stärkere Regulierung der Managementvergütungen kaum geeignet ist, den Vergütungsprozess zu verbessern oder das Wachstum der Bezüge zu begrenzen.
  • Article
    Full-text available
    El presente artículo presenta la contraposición de la responsabilidad de las empresas en cuanto colectivos (List y Pettit) con la responsabilidad de sus miembros, propuesta por el individualismo metodológico (Velasquez), siguiendo un método argumentativo. Este trabajo toma como referencia para el análisis el caso de la manipulación de informes de emisión de contaminantes por parte de Volkswagen. La intención de este texto es afirmar la responsabilidad de las empresas en cuanto agentes colectivos, que cuentan con la capacidad de responder ante el entorno social en el que se desempeñan y al que impactan a través de sus acciones. Por medio de un análisis de argumentación ética se busca profundizar en la responsabilidad colectiva, cuestión relevante que exige ser abordada tanto por las consecuencias que la actividad empresarial genera en el entorno, como porque las respuestas que demos al respecto nos permitirán determinar qué podemos exigir a las empresas como miembros de la comunidad moral.
  • Article
    A major dilemma in the economics and managerial literatures is whether decentralized structures can overcome the problems of incomplete information and the lack of truthful reporting. These problems intensify when agents distort the measures and data that they report to principals and adopt gaming strategies. This paper addresses these questions from the perspective of performance management in multi-level principal-agent relations. We show that agents are key players, and that monitoring and sanctioning for gaming should be included in the explicit contract between principals and subordinates. We apply the model and its insights to the financial services industry where misconduct flourishes.
This research doesn't cite any other publications.