Content uploaded by Mohammad Ibrahim Khalil Ph.D.
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Mohammad Ibrahim Khalil Ph.D. on Jan 29, 2016
Content may be subject to copyright.
International Journal of Geosciences, 2016, 7, 47-52
Published Online January 2016 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/ijg
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2016.71005
How to cite this paper: Khalil, Md.I., Khan, Md.N.I., Kabir, Md.Z., Majumder, R.K., Ali, Md.I., Paul, D. and Islam, S.M.A.
(2016) Heavy Minerals in Sands along Brahmaputra (Jamuna) River of Bangladesh. International Journal of Geosciences, 7,
47-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2016.71005
Heavy Minerals in Sands along
Brahmaputra (Jamuna) River
of Bangladesh
Md. Ibrahim Khalil1*, Md. Nazrul Islam Khan2, Md. Zafrul Kabir1, Ratan Kumar Majumder1,
Md. Idris Ali3, Debasish Paul3, Syed Mohammad Azharul Islam4
1Nuclear Minerals Unit, Atomic Energy Research Establishment, Dhaka, Bangladesh
2Material Science Division, Atomic Energy Center, Bangladesh Atomic Energy Commission, Dhaka, Bangladesh
3Health Physics and Radioactive Waste Management Unit, Atomic Energy Research Establishment, Dhaka,
Bangladesh
4Department of Physics, Jahangirnagar University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
Received 25 December 2015; accepted 25 January 2016; published 28 January 2016
Copyright © 2016 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Abstract
Sands along Brahmaputra River of Bangladesh have long been considered to be a source of
heavy minerals (HMs) since it traversed a long way through various terrains. An attempt has
been made under this research work to determine the kinds and amounts of heavy minerals in
the sands sourced from the river system. Samples from 14 locations along Brahmaputra River
covering 30 km distance from upstream to downstream of the river are found to contain dif-
ferent heavy minerals concentration with a range of 7.92 - 25.16 weight% with the remaining
of the sample comprising silicate and aluminosilicates. Mineral characterization from peak po-
sitions in diffractogram of X-ray Diffraction (XRD) evaluate quartz, feldspar and mica are major
categories light mineral while rutile, magnetite, illmenite, zircon, monazite, garnet, uranium
arsenide and uranium fluoride are the major types heavy minerals. Ilmenite and rutile are
main contributors of total heavy mineral (THM). Titanium bearing minerals ilmenite and rutile
contributes 26.22% - 31.01% and 14.57% - 23.50% of THM. In the present study area, most of
the sands are found to be fine and medium grained as obtained from the particle sizes analysis
using 18- to 230-mesh.
Keywords
Heavy Minerals, River, Sand, Bangladesh
*Corresponding author.
Md. I. Khalil et al.
48
1. Introduction
Minerals are the composite of different elements and occur naturally as crystalline inorganic substances in sedi-
ments. Mineral sediments, sands and mud are weathered from mountain belts, transported by rivers, glaciers or
wind and deposited. Minerals are classified into two types on the basis of its density such as light minerals (spe-
cific density less than 2.9/103 kg·m−3) and heavy minerals (specific density greater than 2.9/103 kg·m−3) [1]. The
erosion of weathered rocks and minerals results in the concentration of the more resistant and higher specific
gravity (density) minerals (2.9/103 kg·m−3).
The Brahmaputra River originating in Tibet and flowing through Tibet and the north-eastern part of India en-
ters Bangladesh in Kurigram District. The immense amount of sediment carried by the Brahmaputra River, de-
rived from intense erosion of the Himalayas (in the north), is delivered to the Bay of Bengal. During transporta-
tion sandy materials laid down on the bed of the river, forming sand bars. The thickness of sand deposits up to
gravel bed is 44 m [2]. For economic exploitation of mineral sands, it is necessary to identify the minerals
present, quantify total reserves of sand deposits, determine the contents and quality of economic minerals, and
find the market demands in the country and abroad. Non-marine alluvial sand placer deposits are also known to
be sources of heavy minerals (HMs), e.g. Gbangbama deposit in Sierra Leone [4], central Kalimantan, Borneo,
Indonesia [3]. Compared to HM sand accumulations in beach sand deposits, the concentration of HMs in river
sands is generally lower, with as little as 5% - 10% total HMs [4]. Heavy mineral river deposits may be promi-
nent in Bangladesh as the river and drainage systems within Bangladesh are extensive, carrying large quantities
of sandy sediments to the coastal regions, e.g. the Brahmaputra River carries an estimated (7.35 - 8.00) × 108
tone of sediment per year [5] [6]. The alluvial sediments contain both light and HMs with the HMs generally
deposited on the bed of the river systems forming HM-rich sand bars.
Heavy minerals, having higher specific gravity, occur in all sands. Some sands contain large enough concen-
trations of valuable heavy minerals to serve as commercial sources of these minerals. The kinds and amounts of
heavy minerals occurring in Brahmaputra River are of great interest to warrant commercial exploitation. An at-
tempt has been made through this study to know the heavy minerals concentration together with individual
heavy mineral quantification along Brahmaputra River in Bangladesh.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
The present study area covers Kurigram sadar, Ulipur and Chilmari Upazila of Kurigram district which is tra-
versed by Brahmaputra (Jamuna) river (25˚48'26"; 89˚45'09" - 25˚33'32"; 89˚41'01"). The study area covers sta-
ble sand bars in an area of 30 km × 4 km from upstream to downstreamof the Brahmaputra River in the Kuri-
gram district, north-eastern Bangladesh (Figure 1).
2.2. Sample Collection and Analysis
The present study covers about 30 km × 4 km area from which 14 successive locations were selected and num-
bered as DK1-DK14. From each location two samples were collected from sand bar (“chars”) and river bed found
in the study area. The sample locations were recorded in terms of degree-minute-second (latitudinal and longitu-
dinal position) using a hand-held global positioning system (GPS) (Model: Magellan-Map-410) unit. Each loca-
tion is separated by a distance of approximately 2 km (approximately 1 minute in co-ordinate system). The sam-
ples were collected at the depth of 0 - 5 cm by plastic spade during summer period of 2014 and collected sam-
ples were packed in polyethylene bags. Each sample has the weight of about 2 kg. The collected samples were
air dried at room temperature in open air.
Preparation and preliminary analysis of sediment samples were carried out as per the procedure given in
Carver [7] and Solai et al. [8]. Heavy mineral separation was carried out using heavy liquid bromoform of 2.89
specific gravity as per the standard procedures outlined by Milner [9]. The total heavy mineral percentages
(THM) were calculated. Using a hand magnet, magnetic minerals (magnetite) were separated from the heavy
mineral fractions and the weight percentage was estimated. The samples were also examined to measure their
granulometric fractions such as contents of sand, silt and clay. Using an ASTM sieve, about 100 g of sediment
was taken for separation of sand, silt and clay fractions by sieving.
Md. I. Khalil et al.
49
Figure 1. Location map of the study area.
For mechanical separation 10 kg raw sand samples were dried in the sun to remove moisture. Separation of
heavy and light minerals was carried out depending on specific gravity/density of the minerals using labora-
tory shaking table. For each sample, heavy minerals fraction obtained after density separation dried in burner.
Magnetite, ilmenite, rutile and zircon mixed with others were separated using Induced Roll Magnetic Separa-
tor (IRMS) applying fixed magnetic intensity at 0.5 amp, 2.5 amp, 5.5 amp, and 7.5 amp condition, respec-
tively.
Powder X-ray Diffraction (XRD) is a versatile technique that can be used to identify any crystalline sub-
stances, such as most minerals. It can also be used to quantify the proportions of different minerals or indeed
many other substances when they are present in a mixture. Powder X-ray diffraction analysis is seemingly the
perfect technique for crystalline-mixture analysis, since each component of the mixture produces its characteris-
tic pattern independently of the others, making it possible to identify the various components by unscrambling
their superposed patterns. An X-ray beam of known wavelength is focused on a powdered sample and X-ray
diffraction peaks are measured using a detector. In the present study X-ray diffraction technique has been uti-
lized to discern these properties. The phase identification was performed using Philips X’Pert Pro multipurpose
X-ray diffractometer which uses copper Kα radiation. X-ray generator operated at 40 kV and 30 mA, and all
scans were run at a speed of 2˚ per minute, from 10˚ to 70˚, with a continuous step size of 0.02.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Heavy Mineral Separation Analysis
The heavy mineral separation analysis has been carried out to know the total heavy mineral (THM) weight per-
centage in the present samples. Weight percentage of separated heavy minerals in most of the samples varied
from 8% to 15%, while in one sample it reaches to 25%; similar THM value is reported for Brahmaputra river
sand [10]. The THM percentage is varied greatly from site to site. It is minimum in DK13 and it is maximum in
DK4 (Figure 2). Other sites are having intermediate values.
Average THM value in the sand samples of the study area is 12.40% while low (within10%) THM percentage
is encountered in four locations. These values of THM are higher than the other river of Bangladesh as observed
in someshari river [11]. The actual sorting and concentration of heavy minerals takes place due to the actions of
two principal agents i.e. action of waves/currents and wind. Mechanical separation of raw sand using Induced
Md. I. Khalil et al.
50
Roll Magnetic Separator (IRMS) resulted to separate magnetite, ilmenite, rutile and zircon mixed with other
minerals. Separation of samples DK1, DK8 and DK12 reveals that ilmenite and rutile are main contributors of to-
tal heavy mineral (THM). Titanium bearing minerals ilmenite and rutile contributes 26.22% - 31.01% and 14.57%
- 23.50% of THM.
3.2. Granulometric Analysis
Granulometric analysis has been carried out to know the content of sand, silt and clay (%) in the present sedi-
ments. Percentage of sand, silt and clay (%) content of the samples are presented in Figure 3. Sand is the main
constituent in all the sampling locations, which varied from 91.87% to 99.74%. Silt content is the least constitu-
ent which varied from 0.03% to 7.98%. In the samples studied, the heavy minerals occur predominantly in the
60- to 200-mesh sieve grade (Table 1). 75% - 90% heavy minerals of THM occur in 60- to 120-mesh while
some heavy mineral grains are finer but most of the samples contain negligible amounts of material of this grain
size. In a given sample, the heavy minerals are primarily finer grained than the average grain size of the whole
sample.
Figure 2. Heavy minerals weight% in the sand sample of the study area.
Figure 3. Distribution of sand, silt and clay (%) content in sediment samples of the study area.
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
Heavy Minerals %
Heavy Minerals%
8.37
14.38
12.92
25.16
10.92
12.43
10.33
9.87
10.95
13.01
14.83
11.52
7.92
10.00
DK1
DK2
DK3
DK4
DK5
DK6
DK7
DK8
DK9
DK10
DK11
DK12
DK13
DK14
Md. I. Khalil et al.
51
3.3. X-Ray Diffraction
X-ray diffraction is a unique analytical tool for the analysis of geological samples. It is the most important and
informative technique for identification and characterization of minerals in the sediments. The XRD spectra
were recorded for all the sediment samples to determine the mineralogical composition. A representative dif-
fractogram is shown in Figure 4 along with name of the minerals present.
The XRD pattern (Figure 4) indicates that the compositions are of single-phase structure since no ambiguous
reflections other structure is evidenced. Analyzing the XRD patterns we notice that the position of the peaks
comply with the reported value. All diffraction peaks of the studied samples are compared to the reported struc-
ture for relevant base sand samples. The observed peaks at 2 theta value of 18.37, 21.24, 23.86, 26.97, 29.01,
30.10, 35.42, 36.95, 38.43, 39.62, 40.64, 44.24, 46.10, 47.81, 50.53, 53.43, 55.30, 60.28, 63.68, 68.55 confirmed
that the sand is mainly containing Quartz, Monazite, Feldspar, Uranium Fluoride, Rutile, Zircon, Hematite,
Kayanite, Uranium Arsenide. Observed peak positions were matched against the International Centre for Dif-
fraction Data (ICDD) Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction System (JCPDS) card database.
The Brahmaputra drains the Tibetan Plateau of China and is dominated by upland tributaries originating in the
Himalayas. The Brahmaputra flows through various rock types including Precambrian metamorphics (high-grade
schists, gneisses, quartzites, metamorphosed limestones), felsic intrusives, and Paleozoic-Mesozoic sandstones,
shales and limestones [12]. From the heavy mineral assemblage study of the Brahmaputra-Jamuna River sand, it
can be postulated that there are several types of source rock complexes are exist in the specific source area
Table 1. Grain size distribution and weight% of heavy minerals.
Heavy Mineral Wt%
60-mesh 120-mesh 200-mesh Pan
Ilmenite 8.79 - 25.72 54.76 - 63.27 13.50 - 19.45 5.33 - 8.02
Rutile 11.33 - 55.82 36.03 - 62.42 7.12 - 22.00 1.00 - 4.26
Zircon + others 15.25 - 53.03 42.21 - 73.41 4.51 - 11.00 0.10 - 0.40
10 20 30 40 50 60 70
0
200
400
600
800
1000
R
M
R, Z, M
K
UF
F, UAs
Q, R
Q, F, M
FeO
Q, UAs
R
R, KQ, FeO
Q, UAs, UF
F, Z, K
F, M, FeO
R, M, Z F, Z
Q, F, M
UF
Intensity
2Theta(deg)
DK-11
Figure 4. The representative XRD pattern of the sand sample. M = Monazite, Q = Quartz, F = Feldspar, UF = Uranium Flu-
ride, R = Rutile, Z = Zircon, FeO = Magnetite, K = Kyanite, UAs = Uranium Arsenide.
Md. I. Khalil et al.
52
mainly Lesser Himalayan and Indo-Burman Ranges with having little influence of Himalayan tributaries and
north Himalayan [13]. Heavy minerals obtained in the study might have the similar source as described by the
researchers.
4. Conclusion
The heavy fractions of sands along the Brahmaputra River are primarily the source of the iron titanium and iron
oxide minerals magnetite and ilmenite. Most of the heavy minerals are in the 60- to 200-mesh size range. Most
of the samples have between 8 and 15 percent heavy minerals. Ilmenite ranges from about 4 to 9 percent and ru-
tile ranges from about 3 to 5 percent. Such percentages are much higher than those of Someshari river sands of
Bangladesh. Considering the high heavy mineral concentration in river sands, the possibility of commercial uti-
lization of the heavy minerals in sands along the Brahmaputra River is quite a burning issue at the present time.
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to local Administration and people of the study area for their assistance during field
work. The authors are also grateful to laboratory staffs of Nuclear Minerals Unit of Atomic Energy Research
Establishment for their assistance in laboratory analysis. This work is financed by the Ministry of Science and
Technology, Government of The People’s Republic of Bangladesh under the Special Allocation program 2014-
2015.
References
[1] de Meijer, R.J., James, J.R., Jennings, P.J. and Koeyers, J.E. (2001) Cluster Analysis of Radionuclide Concentration in
Beach Sand. Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 54, 535-542. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0969-8043(00)00196-2
[2] Umitsu, M. (2001) Holocene Sea-Level Changes and Coastal Evolution in Japan. The Quaternary Research, 30, 187-
196.
[3] Aral, H., Pownceby, M.I. and Im, J. (2008) Characterisation and Beneficiation of Zircon-Rich Heavy Mineral Concen-
trates from Central Kalimantan (Borneo, Indonesia). Transactions of the Institution of Mining and Metallurgy Section
B—Applied Earth Science, 117, 77-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/174327508X339837
[4] Force, E.R. (1991) Geology of Titanium-Mineral Deposits. Geological Society of America, Special Paper 259.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1130/spe259-p1
[5] Coleman, J.M. (1969) Brahmaputra River: Channel Processes and Sedimentation. Sedimentary Geology, 3, 139-239.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0037-0738(69)90010-4
[6] Rahman, M.A., Biswas, P.K., Zaman, M.N., Miah, M.Y., Hossain, T. and Imamul Huq, S.M. (2012) Characterisation
of the Sand of Brahmaputra River of Bangladesh. Bangladesh Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, 47, 167-
172.
[7] Carver, R.E. (1971) Heavy Mineral Separation. In: Carver, R.E., Ed., Procedures in Sedimentary Petrology, Wiley,
NewYork, 427-452.
[8] Solai, A., Suresh Gandhi, M., Chandrasekaran, K. and Ram Mohan, V. (2009) Distribution of Heavy Mineral Sand
Their Provenance Studies in and around Tamiraparani Estuary and off Tuticorin Tamil Nadu, India. International
Journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering, 2, 527-543.
[9] Milner, I. (1962) Sedimentary Petrology. George Allen and Unwin Ltd., London, 643-715.
[10] Rahman, M.A., Pownceby, M.I., Haque, N., Bruckard, W.J. and Zaman, M.N. (2014) Characterisation of Titanium-
Rich Heavy Mineral Concentrates from the Brahmaputra River Basin, Bangladesh. Applied Earth Science (Transac-
tions of the Institution of Mining and Metallurgy B), 123, 222-233.
[11] Rahman, M.A., Zaman, M.N., Biswas, P.K., Sultana, S. and Nandy, P.K. (2015) Physical Separation for Upgradation
of Valuable Minerals: A Study on Sands of the Someswari River. Bangladesh Journal of Scientific and Industrial Re-
search, 50, 53-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjsir.v50i1.23810
[12] Huizing, H.G.J. (1971) A Reconnaissance Study of the Mineralogy of Sand Fractions from East Pakistan Sediments
and Soils. Geoderma, 6, 109-133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0016-7061(71)90029-2
[13] Jasy, J.B., Rahman, M.J.J. and Yeasmin, R. (2010) Sand Petrology of the Exposed Bar Deposits of the Brahmapu-
tra-Jamuna River, Bangladesh: Implication for Provenance. Bangladesh Geoscience Journal, 16, 1-22.