Conference PaperPDF Available

A Smart Home Energy Management Strategy Based on Demand Side Management

Authors:

Abstract

In this paper we propose an ECG optimization model for a smart home based on DSM.The proposed model is an efficient SHEM strategy. The model is proposed keeping in view the minimization of energy consumption,energy consumption cost and energy generation cost.The model is based on efficient scheduling of appliances and an ECG optimization algorithm is proposed.We are using and optimizing energy from two energy sources namely lceg and lcd which are also known as macrogrid and microgrid respectively.The problem is solved as cost optimization problem using genetic algorithm and mathematically formulated using binary MNKP. The simulation results show that our ECG model efficiently reduces the cost of energy consumption, energy generation and energy consumption utilization.
A Smart Home Energy Management Strategy
based on Demand Side Management
Zafar Iqbal1, Nadeem Javaid2,, Mobushir Riaz Khan1,
Farman Ali Khan3, Zahoor Ali Khan4,5, Umar Qasim6
1Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpind 46000, Pakistan
2COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
3COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Attock 43600, Pakistan
4Faculty of Engineering, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, B3J 4R2 Canada
5Higher Colleges of Technology, Fujairah 4114, United Arab Emirates
6University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2J8, Canada
Corresponding author: nadeemjavaidqau@gmail.com, www.njavaid.com
Abstract—In this paper we propose an ECG optimization
model for a smart home based on DSM.The proposed model
is an efficient SHEM strategy. The model is proposed keeping
in view the minimization of energy consumption,energy con-
sumption cost and energy generation cost.The model is based
on efficient scheduling of appliances and an ECG optimization
algorithm is proposed.We are using and optimizing energy
from two energy sources namely lceg and lcd which are also
known as macrogrid and microgrid respectively.The problem is
solved as cost optimization problem using genetic algorithm and
mathematically formulated using binary MNKP. The simulation
results show that our ECG model efficiently reduces the cost of
energy consumption, energy generation and energy consumption
utilization.
Keywords:-Demand Side M anagement,
Microgrid,Distributed Energy Resources,
Smartgrid,Appliance scheduling.
I. INTRODUCTION
Demand side management and demand response program
are the area of smart grid research which encourage the utility
consumer to shift their high peak load to to low peak hours
to reduce their electricity bill,avail user comfort and ensure
balanced use of energy.In recent days the smart grid and
microgrid is replacing the traditional electricity grid due to the
increasing demand of the energy for industrial and residential
area,this increasing demand of energy leads to more genera-
tion of energy and exploring new ways to fulfill increasing
energy demand which leads to more air pollution and carbon
emission.Smart grid means traditional electricity grid plus IT
which can also be named as macrogrid while microgrid is
a local energy generation set up for homes,residential area
and buildings on a small scale which is related to distributed
energy resources(DER) e.g. local diesel or gas generator,solar
power,wind power,vehicle-to-grid,waste-to-energy etc.
In this work we proposed an optimization model known as
ECG.The model aim to minimize energy consumption,balance
use of energy,energy consumption cost and energy generation
cost.We have proposed a set of appliances S(sh)in a smart
home which in our model is using energy from two main
sources that is lceg and lcd which is further divided into
load categories as discussed,and each one is mathematically
formulated for one time slot and 24 hour time horizon.The
subcategories of load is not given here in this work due to
space limitation.The energy generation model is using local
generator and solar energy to generate power for running
regular load in a smart home.
A similar work is done by [1].In which the authors proposes
a distributed optimization framework for demand response
based on cost optimization and each user in this model
is receiving information in response to varying electricity
prices.For scheduling of appliances they use approximate
greedy iterative algorithm to minimize the cost.In [2]the
authors proposes a new demand side management technique
and a new energy efficient scheduling algorithm to operate the
appliances in such a way to reduce monetary expense of the
consumers based on varying price model taking into account
the uncertainties in appliances operation time and renewable
energy generation. [3] Proposes a communication based load
scheduling protocol for the smart home appliances.They use
two types of appliances one which have delay flexibility
and second which consume power as they desire.They use
energy management controller to decide variation in electricity
prices and formulate the optimization problem as cost saving
problem.
The rest of the paper is organized as follows.In section two
we discuss the related work,and section three present a com-
prehensive system model consisting of energy consumption
model,energy consumption cost model and energy generation
model,while section four discusses the mathematical model of
the problem including problem discussion,objective function
and proposed algorithm.Section five are conclusion and future
work and finally references in section sex.
II. RELATED WORK
In this section we discuss the similar work done by re-
search community on appliances scheduling and optimization
of cost and energy consumption.In [4] the author consider
the minimum electricity cost scheduling and optimization
problem for smart home appliances and solve the problem
using mixed integer linear programing.They consider several
realistic scenarios based on real time price and optimal power
profile signal to minimize cost.
In [5] the authors discusses consumer demand response
signal so that consumers can control their electricity price
and carbon footprints.The consumers use this information as
an incentive to minimize peak load demand by balancing
consumption of load.In work [6] a new user aware demand
side management technique is proposed for handling resi-
dential load while keeping in view the appliance waiting
time.Knapsack technique is used to keep trade off between
energy consumption and appliance waiting time while for
electricity cost and peak load demand reduction K-Wind
Driven Optimization technique is used.
In [7] the authors propose a user comfort aware effi-
cient residential management strategy and considering the
minimization of user frustration model,peak-to-average ratio
and electricity cost and solve the optimization problem by
proposing EREM algorithm.
In [8]the authors proposes a residential demand response
algorithm for the scheduled plan of home appliances.They
used mixed integer linear programming to minimize electricity
cost and peak load demand based on time-varying electricity
price.On the other hand they using solar system and storage
to make the schedule plan more effective.In [9] the authors
presents an optimal residential load commitment framework
to achieve cost saving and PAR reduction.
III. SYSTEM MODEL
Distributed energy resources-DER are power generation
systems or power storage technologies on a local and small
scale consisting of energy generation and energy storage like
co-generation, solar energy generation, wind power genera-
tion,local power generation via diesel or gas generator, hydro
power generation, waste-to-energy generation, vehicle-to-grid
generation, PV storage, flywheels, etc, which is also called
microgrid. The microgrid is a combination of local sources
of energy generation. The microgrids are modern, localized,
decentralized and small scale power generation units (having
capacity of 10 MW or less) contrary to large scale, centralized
and traditional electric grid called macrogrid. Microgrids are
typically low voltage source and generate AC power, and work
independently from electric grid and are usually installed by
the community or homes which serve them locally.In our
system model we take load from two main sources i.e. from
electric grid and microgrid which are known as lceg and lcd
load and divided these two main types of load into further
categories as mentioned below.Our microgrid include local
gas generator and solar energy,the system model consists of
three sub model 1. Energy consumption model 2. Energy con-
sumption cost model 3. Energy generation model to minimize
electricity cost,energy consumption and minimization of DER
cost.
A. Energy Consumption Model.
In this section the energy consumption is discussed.The
energy consumption from energy sources are categorized into
two main types i.e. lceg and lcd which are further divided
into sub categories, and the appliances load is also cate-
gorized according to these types of loads.The total load of
appliances is running on lceg source except regular or base
load which is using lcd for energy consumption.This type of
load includes home lighting,television,laptop,mobile charging
etc.These types of load usually consume very less wattage and
are must run load and users can not compromise on comfort
here,such load are not scheduled and can not be included
in demand side management otherwise user comfort will be
severely compromise and not enough saving in cost.Energy
consumption of such type of load from DER can be calculated
as in equation(1).
E(totalec,rl,α)=
24
X
t=1
nrl
X
α=1
e(α,rl,t)P(pvg)(t)=0 (1)
where
E(totalec,rl,α)is total energy consumption by appliances αfor
base load from microgrid,αis appliance,totalec is total energy
consumed from microgrid,rl is base load,nrl is total no of
appliances consuming base load,P(pvg)(t)is power generated
by local generator and PV.We are assuming a smart home
with a set of αappliances denoted by S(sh).The mathematical
formulation of energy consumption of each type of load
(appliances) is given in following equations.In our scenario
t is a time slot which is one hour and belong to T which
is a total time horizon or total schedulable time which is 24
hours i.e. T=24 ,each appliance is denoted by αwe assume
that appliance αconsume an energy Eα(t) in time slot t and
tT.The energy consume by each appliance αand total
energy consume by all appliances i.e. of a set of all appliances
Ssh, means the overall energy consumption of smart home
is formulated in equation (2) and equation (3)respectively as
below.
Etotalec(S,α)=
24
X
t=1
n
X
α=1
eα(t)(2)
E(totalec,t,S(sh))=
n
X
α=1
nleg
X
lega=1
mder
X
ldera=1
e(legα,lderα,Ssh,t)(3)
tT, α Ssh,lega Segα,lder Ssderα Segα
Ssh, lder Sder,α,i.e.Ssh = (Segα )S(Sder,α)
Where
Etotalec(S,α)is total energy consumption by appliance α
belong to set S, eα(t)is energy of appliance αin time slot t,
totalec is total energy consumption, Ssh is set of appliances
in a smart home, nleg is no of appliances consuming lceg
load, mder is no of appliances consuming lcd load, legα
is an appliance consuming lceg load, lderα is an appliance
consuming Microgrid load,As we already assumed that S is a
set of appliances αin a smart home and αiS i.e.
S={α1, α2, α3, . . . , αn}
The set S comprises of all the appliances belong to different
categories of appliances which are categorized based on
load types.The energy consumption of each appliance α
for one time slot and for 24 hour time horizon as in
equation(2) and equation(3) respectively. The load types
defined are of two categories,load type which are connected
to electric grid and load type which are connected to DER’s-
Distributed Energy Resources,in our case the DER include
PV(Photovoltaic) and local diesel generator,which is also
called microgrid,thus second category of load is connected to
microgrid source.Hence we have two main sources of load
for our smart home appliances of set Ssh i.e. lceg and lcd.The
first category of load lceg-Load connected to electric grid is
further divided into the following load types.1. Deferrable
load-dl:Pool pump,dryer,water heater,washing machine,Air
conditioner,kettle,hob,washer,dishwasher,heating,EV battery
charging,batch printing,photocopying 2. Non deferrable
load-ndl:lights 3. Non deferrable and non interruptible
load-ndnil:refrigerator,lightening and servers 4. Deferrable
and interruptible load-dil:washer,dryer,dishwasher,batch
printing,photocopying 5. Deferrable and non interruptible
load-dnil: 6. Non deferrable and interruptible load-ndil:The
second category of load lcd-load connected to DER is
further divided into the following two types i.e.7. Regular
load-rl:lightening,heating etc. 8. Elastic load-el:washing
machine,dishwasher,
Load of both categories is scheduled except regular load or
base load. Each type of load energy consumption and energy
consumption cost is calculated, energy consumption of the
load connected to electric grid in one hour or one time slot t
and in total time horizon i.e. 24 hours is given in equation(4)
and equation(5) respectively.
EL(lceg ,t,ec)=
24
X
t=1
nlceg
X
α=1
EG(t,lceg )(4)
EL(lceg ,ec,t)EL(lceg,ec,t)(4a)
EL(lceg ,ec,t)< EL(lceg,ec,t)< Q(t)(4b)
where
lceg means load connected to electric grid, nlceg is no of
appliances consuming lceg load,t is time slot such that t
T, EG is electric grid,lceg includes {dl,ndl,ndnil, dil,dnil,ndil}
types of load, ec means energy consumption,Q(t)is the total
quantity of energy in time slot t.The energy consumption of
second category of load lcd for one time slot and for 24 hour
time horizon is given in equation (5) and equation (6) as
follow.
EL(lcd,t,ec)=
n
X
α=1
eα(lcd,α,t)(5)
EL(lcd,t,ec)=
24
X
t=1
nlcd
X
lcdα=1
eα(lcd,α,t)(6)
tT, α Sα
where
nlcd is no of appliances consuming lcd load, lcdα is an
appliance consuming lcd load,lcd means load connected to
microgrid. In the above section the total energy consumption
load is calculated,energy consumption of grid-connected and
DER-connected and for each appliance for one time slot and
for 24 hour time slot is separately calculated and mathemati-
cally formulated.
B. Energy Consumption Cost Model
In this section we discuss the energy consumption cost cal-
culation and formulation.The energy consumption cost model
of the set Sαof appliances αis as follow.Now we have to
calculate energy consumption cost for lceg load, lcd load
and its sub types deferrable load,non deferrable load,non de-
ferrable and non interruptible load,deferrable and interruptible
load,deferrable and non interruptible load,deferrable and non
interruptible load,non deferrable and interruptible load,regular
load,elastic load.The energy consumption cost of each type
of load is calculated by using the following equations.First
we calculate the total energy consumption cost of overall
load including grid-connected and DER-connected is given in
equation (7) and equation (8) below.
E(totalecc,Ssh,t,α)=
24
X
t=1
mlceg
X
lcegα=1
olcder
X
lcderα=1
e(totalecc,Ssh,lceg α,lcderα,t)EP (t)(7)
tT, α SA
Total daily energy consumption cost is calculated by consid-
ering the energy generation cost as well.So,daily energy con-
sumption cost is calculated by using the following equations.
E(totalecc,S(sh),t)=
24
X
t=1
E(lceg,ecc,t)
+E(lcd,ecc,t)+P(pvg)(t)(8)
tT, α SA
where, E(totalecc,S(sh),t)is the total daily energy consumption
cost of the user including energy generation cost and energy
consumption cost,E(lceg,ecc,t)is the energy consumption cost
of lceg power source, E(lcd,ecc,t)is the energy consumption
cost of lcd power source, P(pvg)(t)is the energy consumption
cost of power generated by local generator, totalecc is total
energy consumption cost, lceg is load connected to electric
grid, lcd is load connected to der, pvg is der sources i.e. solar
and generator energy, mlceg is no of appliances consuming
lceg load, olcder is no of appliances connected to microgrid,
lcegα is an appliance consuming lceg load, lcderαis an
appliance consuming lcd load.
The above energy consumption cost model include the total
consumption cost of a set S of appliances αin a smart home
also the set can be denoted by Ssh i.e. a set of all appliances
in a smart home.As the appliances load is divided into two
categories of which cost of each one is separately calculated
and of each load types inside these two categories.
Now the energy consumption cost of load connected to electric
grid for each appliance αfor one time slot and for 24 hour
time slot is given in equation (9) and equation (10) below.
E(lceg,ecc,t,α)=
nlceg
X
α=1
e(α,lceg,t)E P (t)(9)
E(lceg,ecc,t,α)=
24
X
t=1
nlceg
X
α=1
e(α,lceg,ecc,t)E P (t)(10)
tT, α S
where
lceg is load connected to electric grid, nlceg is no of ap-
pliances consuming lceg load, ecc is energy consumption
cost,where lceg includes {dl,ndl,ndnil,dil,dnil,ndil} types of
loads.The energy consumption cost of lcd-connected load for
one time slot and for 24 hour time slot is given in equation
(11) and equation(12) as below.
E(lcd,ecc,t,α)=
n
X
α=1
e(α,lcd,ecc,t)EP (t)(11)
E(lcd,ecc,t,α)=
24
X
t=1
nlcd
X
lcdα=1
e(α,lcd,ecc,t)EP (t)(12)
C. Energy Generation Model.
As our second category of appliances are running on der
or microgrid which include in our case, photovoltaic(PV)
generation and local diesel generator generation and the der-
connected load is using it.Therefore the energy generation
model is formulated as total expense minimization cost of der
as given in equation (13) below, the total expense include gen-
eration fuel cost GFEp(g),cost due to losses C(lo)negligible in
this case ,fixed cost F(ct)i.e. startup cost ST(ct),depreciation
cost DP(ct),maintenance cost M(ct).
Minimize
n
X
g=1
λ(g)P2g
+GFEp(g)Pg+F(ct)+M(ct)(13)
subject to
P(g,mn)PgP(g,mx)(13a)
24
X
t=1
n
X
g=1
Pg(t) = E(t,der)(t)(13b)
n
X
g=1
Pg(t) = E(t,der)(t)(13c)
where t is number of time slots, g number of generators, λ(g)is
cost due to losses, negligible in this case, GFEp(g)is total fuel
expense of g units, F(ct)is fixed cost Fct =ST(ct)+DP(ct),
ST(ct)is start up cost, DP(ct)is depreciation cost, M(ct)
is maintenance cost, P(g)is power produced by generator
g, P(g,mx)is maximum power generation limit, P(g,mn)is
minimum power generation limit, E(t,der)is total energy
consumed by der-connected load.
IV. MATHEMATICAL MODEL OF THE PROB LEM
A. Problem Discussion.
In this section we discuss and formulate the mathemat-
ical model of our problem.Our problem is to reduce total
energy consumption,minimize total energy cost and also to
reduce the expenses incur by der energy source.To solve
this optimization problem we propose an optimization model
discussed in system model.Our optimization model includes
energy consumption minimization,energy cost minimization
and energy generation.We have a set of appliances in a smart
home which will consume energy from two main sources i.e.
lceg and lcd which are discussed and formulated in previous
section.These two types of energy source is divided into
further load types which are discussed in start.The regular load
is running on lcd load which is also known as microgrid or
der.After modeling the parameters of our optimization problem
and and its constraints,the model is formulated using binary
MNK P (multiple knapsack problem).The problem is solved
using Genetic Algorithm.Fitness function of genetic algorithm
can be written as below in equation(14).
F F =
24
X
t=1
n
X
α=1
BV(αt)EL(lceg,t,ec)EP (t)
+
24
X
t=1
n
X
α=1
BV(αt)EL(lcd,t,ec)EP (t)(14)
where FF is fitness function.
B. Objective Function.
The objective function can be written as follow.
Minimize
24
X
t=1
n
X
α=1
BV(αt)EL(lceg,t,ec)
+
24
X
t=1
n
X
α=1
BV(αt)EL(lcd,t,ec)(15)
subject to the following constraints
24
X
t=1
n
X
α=1
BV(αt)=LOTα(15a)
24
X
t=1
EαBV(αt)ψ(t)(15b)
24
X
t=1
EαBV(αt)ψ(t)(15c)
δαTLOTαlceg (15d)
tst
αδαtst
α+LOTαlcd (15e)
δα=tst
αlcd, tst
αTst
lcd (15f)
BV(αt)∈ {0,1}(15g)
where
Tst
lcd time in which the appliance αis ON,ψ(t)is energy
consumption limit or total quantity of energy, δαis scheduled
time of appliance α,tst
αis starting time of appliance
α,BV(αt)is a binary variable which shows that appliance
is on or off,LOTαis appliance αtotal time in which it operate.
ECH Algorithm
1: Required pattern of appliances before scheduling,tbs
α,ps,
mxgeneration,αn.
2: Start random population representing the pattern of
appliances.
3: for t=1:24 do
4: d=0
5: for α=1:ps do
6: Execute fitness function equation (14)
7: FF=fitness
8: if (F(α)< F (α1)&&(ET(t)) < CP (t)) then
9: F(α) = F(α)
10: if lcegα(t1) == 1 then
11: tst
α=t
12: dα=tbs
α-tst
α
13: if (dα3)&&(δαLOTα)
14: lceg(t)=1 end if end if
15: if lcdα(t)==1 then
16: tst
(α)=t
17: dα=tbs
α-tst
α
18: if (dα3)&&(δαLOTα)
19: lcd(t)=1 end if end if else
20: F(α) = F(α1) end if end for
21: ap(1,:)=pn(1,:)
22: if apα==1 then
23: LOTα=LOTα1end if
24: d=lcd(t)
25: solve optimization problem equation(13).
Generation of new population.Selection of crossover pair x,y
26: if Pc> rand then
27: crossover (x,y) end if
28: if Pm> rand then
29: crossover (x,y) end if
30: pn(ps,αn) end for
where αnis no of appliances,ap is appliances pattern,CP(t)
is total energy capacity or limit in time slot t,ps is popsize and
pn is popnew.
V. CONCLUSION
In this research work we proposed an efficient ECG op-
timization model including energy consumption minimiza-
tion,energy consumption cost minimization and energy gen-
eration cost optimization for smart home energy management
based on DSM. An ECG algorithm is proposed for balancing
total energy consumption load, cost of energy consumption
and energy generation cost for efficient scheduling of appli-
ances.We are using two main types of energy sources i.e. lceg
and lcd can also be named as macrogrid and microgrid for our
smart home appliances.The lcd energy source act as microgrid
or DER are used to reduce burden of load consumption and
run regular load on it.The simulation results show that our
proposed model and ECG algorithm balencing the energy
consumption and reduces both types of cost as compared to
the results without ECG model.In future we intend to further
elaborate this work by including PAR model,user discomfort
model and implementation of appliances specific constraints.
REFERENCES
[1] Phani Chavali, Student Member, IEEE, Peng Yang, Student Mem-
ber, IEEE, and Arye Nehorai, Fellow, IEEE, “A Distributed Al-
gorithm of Appliance Scheduling for Home Energy Management
System”, IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID, VOL. 5,
NO. 1, JANUARY 2014.
[2] Xiaodao Chen, Tongquan Wei, Member, IEEE, and Shiyan Hu,
Senior Member, IEEE, “Uncertainty-Aware Household Appliance
Scheduling Considering Dynamic Electricity Pricing in Smart
Home”,IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID, VOL. 4,
NO. 2, JUNE 2013.
[3] Kin Cheong Sou, James Weimer, Henrik Sandberg, and Karl
Henrik Johansson, “Scheduling Smart Home Appliances Using
Mixed Integer Linear Programming”,2011 50th IEEE Conference
on Decision and Control and European Control Conference
(CDC-ECC) Orlando, FL, USA, December 12-15, 2011.
[4] Kin Cheong Sou, Mikael K´
lordel, Jonas Wu, Henrik Sand-
berg and Karl Henrik Johansson,“Energy and CO2 Efficient
Scheduling of Smart Home Appliances”,2013 European Control
Conference (ECC)July 17-19, 2013, Zurich, Switzerland.
[5] M. B. Rasheed, M. Awais, N. Javaid,Z. Iqbal, A. Khur-
shid, F. A. Chaudhry, F. Ilahi,“An Energy Efficient Residen-
tial Load Management System for Multi-Class Appliances in
Smart Homes”,Conference:18th IEEE International Conference
on Network-Based Information Systems (NBiS-2015), Taipei,
Taiwan.
[6] M. Awais, N. Javaid,N. Shaheen,Z. Iqbal,G. Rehman,K. Muham-
mad,I. Ahmad,“An Efficient Genetic Algorithm Based Demand
Side Management Scheme for Smart Grid”,Conference:18th IEEE
International Conference on Network-Based Information Systems
(NBiS-2015), Taipei, Taiwan.
[7] Chen Chen, K.G. Nagananda, Gang Xiong, Shalinee Kishore,
Member, IEEE and Lawrence V.Snyder, Member, IEEE,“A
Communication-Based Appliance Scheduling Scheme for
Consumer-Premise Energy Management Systems”,International
Journal of Smart Home Vol. 7, No. 4, July, 2013.
[8] Taeyoon Yu,Dong Sik Kim and Sung-Yong Son,“Optimization of
Scheduling for Home Appliances in Conjunction with Renewable
and Energy Storage Resources”,IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON
SMART GRID, VOL. 4, NO. 1, MARCH 2013.
[9] Mohammad Rastegar,Mahmud Fotuhi-Firuzabad,Farrokh Amini-
far,“Load commitment in a smart home”,Applied Energy 96
(2012) 45 54.
... According to consumer type this algorithm is used in a distributed fashion in the network. Each customers optimizes the trading and energy 27 consumption for profit and discomfort. The proposed model gave better user satisfaction, higher cost savings and reduced PAR demand on the utility. ...
... 27 shows the AWT of appliances by scheduling the appliances with the proposed algorithms, i.e., WDGA, WDGWO and WBPSO. The AWT using GWO, ...
Thesis
Full-text available
The smart grid plays a vital role in decreasing electricity cost via Demand Side Management (DSM). Smart homes, being a part of the smart grid, contribute greatly for minimizing electricity consumption cost via scheduling home appliances. However, user waiting time increases due to the scheduling of home appliances. This scheduling problem is the motivation to find an optimal solution that could minimize the Peak to Average Ratio (PAR) and electricity cost with minimum user waiting time. There are many studies on Home Energy Management (HEM) for cost minimization and peak load reduction. However, none of the systems gave sufficient attention to tackle multiple parameters (i.e., electricity cost and peak load reduction) at the same time where user waiting time is considered to be minimum for residential consumers with multiple homes. Hence, in contribution 1, we propose an efficient HEM scheme using the well-known meta-heuristic Genetic Algorithm (GA), the recently developed Cuckoo Search Optimization Algorithm (CSOA) and the Crow Search Algorithm which can be used for electricity cost and peak load alleviation with minimum user waiting time. The integration of a smart electricity storage system is also taken into account for more efficient operation of the HEM System. Furthermore, we took the real-time electricity consumption pattern for every residence, i.e., every home has its own living pattern. The proposed scheme is instigated in a smart building which is comprised of thirty smart homes (apartments). Critical Peak Pricing (CPP) and Real-Time Pricing (RTP) signals are examined in terms of electricity cost assessment for both a single smart home and a smart building. In addition, feasible regions are presented for multiple and single smart homes, which show the relationship among the electricity cost, electricity consumption and user waiting time. Experimental results prove the effectiveness of our proposed scheme for multiple and single smart homes concerning electricity cost and PAR minimization. Moreover, there subsists a tradeoff between electricity cost and user waiting. With the emergence of automated environments, energy demand by consumers is increasing rapidly. More than 80% of total electricity is being consumed in the residential sector. This brings a challenging task of maintaining the balance between demand and generation of electric power. In order to meet such challenges, a traditional grid is renovated by integrating two-way communication between the consumer and generation unit. To reduce electricity cost and peak load demand, DSM is modeled as an optimization problem and the solution is obtained by applying metaheuristic techniques with different pricing schemes. In contribution 2, an optimization technique, the Hybrid Gray Wolf Differential Evolution (HGWDE) is proposed by merging the Enhanced Differential Evolution (EDE) and Gray Wolf Optimization (GWO) schemes using the same RTP and CPP tariffs. Load shifting is performed from on-peak hours to off-peak hours depending on the electricity cost defined by the utility. However, there is a trade-off between User Comfort (UC) and cost. To validate the performance of the proposed algorithm, simulations have been carried out in MATLAB. Results illustrate that using RTP, the PAR is reduced up to 53.02%, 29.02% and 26.55%, while the electricity bill is reduced up to 12.81%, 12.012% and 12.95%, respectively, for 15-min, 30-min and 60-min operational time intervals (OTI). On the other hand, the PAR and electricity bill are reduced up to 47.27%, 22.91%, 22% and 13.04%, 12%, 11.11% using the CPP tariff. Microgrid is a community-based power generation and distribution system that interconnects smart homes with renewable energy sources. Microgrid generates power for electricity consumers and operates in both islanded and grid-connected modes more efficiently and economically. In contribution 3, we propose optimization schemes for reducing electricity cost and minimizing PAR with maximum UC in a smart home. We consider a grid-connected microgrid for electricity generation which consists of wind turbine and photovoltaic (PV) panel. First, the problem was mathematically formulated through Multiple Knapsack (MKP) then it is solved by existing heuristic techniques: GWO, binary particle swarm optimization (BPSO), GA and Wind Driven Optimization (WDO). Furthermore, we also propose three hybrid schemes for electricity cost and PAR reduction: (1) hybrid of GA and WDO named as WDGA; (2) hybrid of WDO and GWO named as WDGWO; and (3) WBPSO, which is the hybrid of BPSO and WDO. In addition, a battery bank system has also integrated to make our proposed schemes more cost-efficient and reliable to ensure stable grid operations. Finally, simulations have been performed to verify our proposed schemes. Results show that our proposed schemes efficiently minimize the electricity cost and PAR. Moreover, our proposed techniques: WDGA, WDGWO and WBPSO outperform the existing heuristic techniques. The advancements in smart grid, both consumers and electricity providing companies can benefit from real-time interaction and pricing methods. In contribution 4, a smart power system is considered, where consumers share a common energy source. Each consumer is equipped with a Home Energy Management Controller (HEMC) as scheduler and a smart meter. The HEMC keeps updating the electricity proving utility with the load profile of the home. The smart meter is connected to power grid having an advanced metering infrastructure which is responsible for two way communication. Genetic teaching-learning based optimization, flower pollination teaching learning based optimization, flower pollination BAT and flower pollination genetic algorithm based energy consumption scheduling algorithms are proposed. These algorithms schedule the loads in order to shave the peak formation without compromising UC. The proposed algorithms achieve optimal energy consumption profile for the home appliances equipped with sensors to maximize the consumer benefits in a fair and efficient manner by exchanging control messages. Control messages contain energy consumption of consumer and RTP information. Simulation results show that proposed algorithms reduce the PAR by 34.56% and help the users to reduce their energy expenses by 42.41% without compromising the comfort. The daily discomfort is reduced by 28.18%.
... This system uses artificial neural network (ANN) algorithms to predict the supply of energy to enable better management of appliances and energy consumption, such as by turning off an appliance during the peak time and leaving its activity for off-peak time, which is the same concept as DR in which the load-shifting and rescheduling operations are conducted using fuzzy logic (Tascikaraoglu et al. 2014). DSM has been the focus of other studies, such as that proposed by Iqbal et al. (2016) regarding an electrocardiogram (ECG) optimization method used for managing energy consumption and costs. In such an optimization process, for both appliances and microgrid sources including PV panels and local diesel generators, the optimization focuses on minimizing the costs, such as fuel cost, startup cost, and maintenance (Iqbal et al. 2016). ...
... DSM has been the focus of other studies, such as that proposed by Iqbal et al. (2016) regarding an electrocardiogram (ECG) optimization method used for managing energy consumption and costs. In such an optimization process, for both appliances and microgrid sources including PV panels and local diesel generators, the optimization focuses on minimizing the costs, such as fuel cost, startup cost, and maintenance (Iqbal et al. 2016). Basu et al. (2013) also studied the effectiveness and accuracy of using a prediction system for home appliances. ...
Article
With advancement in sensor, control, and communication technologies, homes can now be equipped with more intelligent lighting, HVAC, entertainment, and safety/security systems, as well as appliances with many advanced features, including high energy efficiency. In particular, with computers becoming an integrated part of homes and smart phones offering remote communication with home systems, we are entering a new era in the home industry, an era of smart homes. This paper presents a categorization of smart homes based on their area of focus, such as energy, information and communication, security, health, environmental, home entertainment, and domestic appliances. However, the main objective of this paper is to review different types of energy smart homes in more detail under three major groups, including homes with energy-monitoring systems, systems with control capabilities, and systems with advanced data-processing capabilities. Smart homes with energy-monitoring systems merely provide the total or granular energy-consumption data of the house by using equipment such as in-home displays, whereas systems with control capabilities also include a control unit that can send proper signals for either passive or active measures, such as appliance on/off commands. In contrast, systems with advanced data-processing capabilities include an advanced central processing unit that can provide more complicated analysis results, such as systems that are equipped with an optimization algorithm to optimize the temperature or appliance schedules based on the residents’ comfort level and energy cost. Communication networks in smart homes and associated challenges for their design are also discussed in this paper.
... As real-time pricing methods have spread due to new advancement in technology, reducing energy cost has become an important subject in recent researches. For instance, in [8] the authors present a method to reduce expenses using demand side controlling methods. Researches of this field of study is still on going to find a fast, robust and effective algorithm with the purpose of diminishing electricity cost (such as [9]). ...
... Choose an initial population Run GWO for IGWO iteration with NAGWO subtasks to find 5 the fittest combination of subtask time intervals in term of energy Cost. 6 End for 7 End foreach 8 Find the best number of subtasks 9 Return the best combination of subtasks 10 ...
... We also proposed three hybrid optimization algorithms: wind-driven GA (WDGA), wind-driven GWO (WDGWO) and wind-driven BPSO (WBPSO). Part of this work was already published in [15]. The main contributions of this work are as follows: • We proposed three hybrid schemes: WDGA, WDGWO and WBPSO. ...
Article
Full-text available
Microgrid is a community-based power generation and distribution system that interconnects smart homes with renewable energy sources (RESs). Microgrid efficiently and economically generates power for electricity consumers and operates in both islanded and grid-connected modes. In this study, we proposed optimization schemes for reducing electricity cost and minimizing peak to average ratio(PAR) with maximum user comfort (UC) in a smart home. We considered a grid-connected microgrid for electricity generation which consists of wind turbine and photovoltaic (PV) panel. First, the problem was mathematically formulated through multiple knapsack problem (MKP) then solved by existing heuristic techniques: grey wolf optimization (GWO), binary particle swarm optimization (BPSO), genetic algorithm (GA) and wind-driven optimization (WDO). Furthermore, we also proposed three hybrid schemes for electric cost and PAR reduction: (1) hybrid of GA and WDO named WDGA; (2) hybrid ofWDO and GWO named WDGWO; and (3) WBPSO, which is the hybrid of BPSO and WDO. In addition, a battery bank system (BBS) was also integrated to make our proposed schemes more cost-efficient and reliable, and to ensure stable grid operation. Finally, simulations were performed to verify our proposed schemes. Results show that our proposed scheme efficiently minimizes the electricity cost and PAR. Moreover, our proposed techniques, WDGA, WDGWO and WBPSO, outperform the existing heuristic techniques.
... Several researchers tried to tackle the aforementioned challenges, which could be more elaborated through [8]. For the HEMS, different algorithms have been used such as genetic algorithms [9], stochastic optimization [10] or fuzzy-logic [11], yet the control or optimization boundaries have been limited to the household itself. The local energy management on a microgrid level has been also discussed by [12], where users rely on game theory to schedule their loads based on the offered grid incentives. ...
Conference Paper
Full-text available
The ongoing change of energy policies has been paving the path to a more sustainable energy production via the smart grids. The developed legal framework has encouraged the households to install PV systems, batteries and micro combined heat and power plants (micro-CHP) to increase their own economic benefit. A home energy management system (HEMS) has been taking over the responsibility of managing the available in-house energy generation systems, and shiftable loads such as white goods, heat pumps or electrical vehicles. The economic benefit generated by the HEMS is localized and dependent on the in-house energy generation systems’ capabilities. Consequently, a smart community microgrid, in which a local energy management system (LEMS) is integrated, provides not only an optimal planning within the microgrid, but also within the building itself via coordinating with the HEMS. The main challenges facing the LEMS are the data privacy of the households, decision decentralization, and fair division of economic benefit. In this paper, a double-sided auction mechanism is presented for the smart microgrids, where in-house energy supply and demand devices are participating to maximize economic benefit, and microgrid autonomy.
Article
The way to organize the generation, storage, and management of renewable energy and energy consumption features has taken relevance in recent years due to demands that define the social welfare of this century. Like demand increases, other factors require grid infrastructure improvement, updates, and opening to other technologies that assuage the final customer needs. Precisely, the interest in renewable energy sources, the constant evolution of energy storage technologies, the continuous research involving microgrid management systems, and the evolution of cloud computing technologies and machine learning strategies motivate the development of this article. Tasks associated with a microgrid cluster like the integration of a considerable number of heterogeneous devices, real-time support, information processing, massive storage capabilities, security considerations, and advanced optimization techniques usage could take place in an autonomous and scalable energy management system architecture under a machine learning perspective running in real-time and using Cloud resources. This paper focuses on identifying the elements considered by different authors to define a cloud-based architecture and ensure the appropriately supervised learning functionality under a microgrids cluster environment. Namely, it was necessary to revise and run microgrid simulations, real-time simulation platforms usage, connection to a virtual server for microgrid control and set the energy management system using cloud computing and machine learning. Based on the review and considering the scenarios mentioned, this article presents a scalable and autonomous cloud-based architecture that allows power generation forecast, energy consumption prediction, a real-time energy management system using machine learning techniques.
Article
Full-text available
In this paper, for efficient energy consumption through the residential demand response in the smart grid, an optimization algorithm, which can provide a schedule plan for the home appliance usages, is proposed. In order to minimize the average electricity price based on the time-varying electricity price in conjunction with the peak hourly load, which decides the capacity of the electric supply facilities, we establish a mixed integer linear programming problem considering various energy consumption patterns of home appliances. In addition, a photovoltaic system and an energy storage are added to the residential side to achieve further efficient schedule plans. By measuring the power consumptions of the home appliances with respect to the time, we constructed the power consumption patterns of each appliance and numerically analyzed the performance of our algorithm by using a real time-varying electricity price and the solar cell power profile obtained through a mathematical model.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
In this paper, we propose a novel strategy for a Demand Side Management (DSM) in a Smart Grid (SG). In this strategy, three types of loads are considered, i.e., residential load, commercial load and industrial load. The larger number of appliances of different power rating for each type of load is considered in this work. The focus of this work is to minimize the Peak to Average Ratio (PAR) to increase the efficiency of SG, by increasing the utilization of spinning reserves. On the other hand, our aim is to minimize the electricity consumption cost. Tackling the large number of appliances in an SG is a challenging task, because it increases the complexity of the problem. However, in literature the focus is on small number of appliance. In this work, the load scheduling problem is mathematically formulated and solved by using genetic algorithm. The simulation results show that the propose algorithm reduces the cost, while reducing the peak load demand of the SG.
Article
Full-text available
In this paper, a communication-based load scheduling protocol is proposed for in-home appliances connected over a home area network. Specifically, a joint access and scheduling approach for appliances is developed to enable in-home appliances to coordinate power usage so that the total energy demand for the home is kept below a target value. The proposed protocol considers both “schedulable” appliances which have delay flexibility, and “critical” appliances which consume power as they desire. An optimization problem is formulated for the energy management controller to decide the target values for each time slot, by incorporating the variation of electricity prices and distributed wind power uncertainty. We model the evolution of the protocol as a two-dimensional Markov chain, and derive the steady-state distribution, by which the average delay of an appliance is then obtained. Simulation results verify the analysis and show cost saving to customers using the proposed scheme.
Article
Full-text available
High quality demand side management has become indispensable in the smart grid infrastructure for enhanced energy reduction and system control. In this paper, a new demand side management technique, namely, a new energy efficient scheduling algorithm, is proposed to arrange the household appliances for operation such that the monetary expense of a customer is minimized based on the time-varying pricing model. The proposed algorithm takes into account the uncertainties in household appliance operation time and intermittent renewable generation. Moreover, it considers the variable frequency drive and capacity-limited energy storage. Our technique first uses the linear programming to efficiently compute a deterministic scheduling solution without considering uncertainties. To handle the uncertainties in household appliance operation time and energy consumption, a stochastic scheduling technique, which involves an energy consumption adaptation variable beta, is used to model the stochastic energy consumption patterns for various household appliances. To handle the intermittent behavior of the energy generated from the renewable resources, the offline static operation schedule is adapted to the runtime dynamic scheduling considering variations in renewable energy. The simulation results demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach. Compared to a traditional scheduling scheme which models typical household appliance operations in the traditional home scenario, the proposed deterministic linear programming based scheduling scheme achieves up to 45% monetary expense reduction, and the proposed stochastic design scheme achieves up to 41% monetary expense reduction. Compared to a worst case design where an appliance is assumed to consume the maximum amount of energy, the proposed stochastic design which considers the stochastic energy consumption patterns achieves up to 24% monetary expense reduction without violating the target trip rate of 0.5%. Furthermore, the proposed energy consumption scheduling algorithm can always generate the scheduling solution within 10 seconds, which is fast enough for household appliance applications.
Article
Full-text available
This paper considers the minimum electricity cost scheduling problem of smart home appliances. Operation characteristics, such as expected duration and peak power consumption of the smart appliances, can be adjusted through a power profile signal. The optimal power profile signal minimizes cost, while satisfying technical operation constraints and consumer preferences. Constraints such as enforcing uninterruptible and sequential operations are modeled in the proposed framework using mixed integer linear programming (MILP). Several realistic scenarios based on actual spot price are considered, and the numerical results provide insight into tariff design. Computational issues and extensions of the proposed scheduling framework are also discussed.
Conference Paper
Demand Side Management (DSM) mechanism is used for the implementation of different strategies to encourage residential users to reduce electricity bill as well as energy demand. There is also a close relationship between the consumer and utility for equally benefiting to both in terms of grid stability and bill reduction. Extensive research is undertaken now a days in order to make practical implementation on the possible use of different DSM strategies to regulate the energy demand and carbon emission reduction in the World. The major objective of this work is to study the DSM-based approaches which could be helpful in achieving significant electricity demand reduction at the electricity distribution network which is directly connected to the commercial and residential sector especially. In this work, we use an optimization algorithm to obtain the optimal solution for residential electricity load management in a typical household setting. There are two major tasks of this algorithms; firstly, electricity bill minimization of residential user in time of use pricing models, secondly, peaks reduction of demand curve (peak shaving) which will eventually minimize the investment cost of utility including, peak power plants, and transmission lines. Three types of smart appliances are considered; without delay, delay of one hour, delay of five hours. To validate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm, mathematical models of appliances based on their length of operation time is developed.
Conference Paper
A major goal of smart grid technology (e.g., smart meters) is to provide consumers with demand response signals such as electricity tariff and CO2 footprint so that the consumers can consciously control their electricity consumption patterns. These demand response signals provide incentives for the consumers to help reduce peak energy demand by load balancing, as this is particularly relevant in a situation with high level of renewable energy penetration. However, the volume of information can be overwhelming for the consumers. Further, in some situation minimization of electricity bill and CO2 emission can be conflicting goals and a trade-off analysis is required. To enable the consumers to participate in smart grid effort this paper proposes a decision aiding framework for optimal household appliances scheduling and trade-off analysis through Pareto frontier exploration. To compute the optimal schedules associated with Pareto optimal points, linear optimization problems with SOS2 (special ordered set of type 2) constraints are solved using CPLEX, in the case where the demand response signals are assumed to be piecewise constant. For arbitrary demand response signals, a corresponding dynamic programming solution is proposed. A numerical study demonstrates that in a realistic test case the Pareto frontier analysis can provide valuable information leading to schedules with drastically different electricity and CO2 emission patterns. In addition, the case study verifies that the Pareto frontier can be computed in real-time in a realistic residential computing environment.
Article
Demand side management encourages the users in a smart grid to shift their electricity consumption in response to varying electricity prices. In this paper, we propose a distributed framework for the demand response based on cost minimization. Each user in the system will find an optimal start time and operating mode for the appliances in response to the varying electricity prices. We model the cost function for each user and the constraints for the appliances. We then propose an approximate greedy iterative algorithm that can be employed by each user to schedule appliances. In the proposed algorithm, each user requires only the knowledge of the price of the electricity, which depends on the aggregated load of other users, instead of the load profiles of individual users. In order for the users to coordinate with each other, we introduce a penalty term in the cost function, which penalizes large changes in the scheduling between successive iterations. Numerical simulations show that our optimization method will result in lower cost for the consumers, lower generation costs for the utility companies, lower peak load, and lower load fluctuations.