Technical ReportPDF Available

Do we have privacy in the digital world?

Authors:
  • University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany

Abstract

Not really.
Do we have privacy in the digital world? Kaveh Bakhtiyari Page 1 of 3
Do we have privacy in the digital world?
Kaveh Bakhtiyari
Interactive Systems, Department of Computer & Cognitive Science
Faculty of Engineering, University of Duisburg-Essen
47057 Duisburg, North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW), Germany
Department of Electrical, Electronics and Systems Engineering,
Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment,
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (The National University of Malaysia)
43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia
Published online at www.bakhtiyari.com
Published on December 10, 2014
Last Update: December 10, 2014
Abstract Not really.
When the computer was invented, it was a great idea to calculate and store data. Internet complemented the
greatness of this technology. The hybrid creature of digital gadgets and the Internet is becoming smarter and more
versatile every day in our daily life. Therefore, we are always concerned about our privacy. Personal privacy is a
strong sense of human being. Wearing clothes, erecting walls, fence, partitions, and keeping distance are all the
samples of privacy protection. But how much privacy do we have? Do the technology improvements, privacy
statements and research progress guarantee our privacy? Let’s see whether we have such barriers to protect our
privacy in digital World.
Nowadays, we can find privacy policy statements on every famous or even infamous website which collects the
users’ information. This statement declares clearly the company’s responsibility against the user’s personal
information. Usually, the most important section refers to keeping all the personal information safe and not to
reveal them to any third party. But does it mean privacy to us?
Some computer users are scared of computer webcams (cameras). They even do not feel safe by sitting straight
forward in front of a turned off the camera. Sometimes they cover it to feel more secure. The feeling of being
watched and monitored is an important issue which has been shown in a lot of horror, action movies, and TV
series. Whereas being watched is not only possible by cameras. There are other means of watching the users which
are hidden from user’s vision. Social networks, shopping websites, simple blogging websites, mice, keyboards,
monitors, touch-screens, microphones, all of them can watch us instantly.
If you are an Internet-heavy user, you should be a member of at least one social network. People usually refer to
social networks as a privacy disturbance media. The users set a bunch of settings on their social network profiles
to limit the visibility of contents. By this way, they try to protect their privacy. Even though all those website
settings improve the user’s confidentiality, the user’s posted information should be more concerned. Almost most
of the Internet users are infringing their own privacies implicitly. Much information can be revealed to you which
you may not want to say explicitly, regardless of how strong your privacy settings are. But let’s see HOW?
Social network users reveal their information by posting on their profiles. This information can be personal or
even general knowledge. People comment on posts, show their interest by liking (clicking on Like button) the
items, and interact with their friends online. Over time, all these actions and interactions build a profile of
preferences for each user. Data mining techniques can be employed to build a knowledge on the information on
the user’s profile. Then this profile can obviously say what this person thinks, what he/she likes, what he/she
prefers, what he/she is interested in more and so on [1, 2].
Tag is another useful and privacy threaten invention. They are getting more popular on the social networks,
weblogs, and websites. On textual posts, photos and videos, there is an ability to tag your friends and to be tagged
by friends. Once a person is tagged, his/her profile would be linked to that post and related implicit information
would be mined into the user’s profile. It says where the user was at when, whom the user was with, what was the
user feeling, who else has the same characteristics and preferences as this user [3, 4].
Do we have privacy in the digital world? Kaveh Bakhtiyari Page 2 of 3
Still, there are some users that they do not post anything, they do not hit the LIKE or FOLLOW button, and they
do not leave any comment on any other post. However, they have some friends listed in their friends’ lists, they
have some pages followed and liked to be followed in their accounts. They also have provided some basic
information like education, birthday, languages, family, etc. in their profiles. According to the collaborative
techniques, analyzing of a user’s friends can result in understanding the user’s preferences [5]. The preferences
of the user’s friends can expose the possible characteristics and favorites. The more active your friends are, the
more information can be mined about you.
By not even interacting with social networks, still, it is easy to identify which posts and items the user is interested
in. Users interaction with the website shows the feelings. There have been quite a long literature on human
feelings recognition in human-computer interaction. Have you ever noticed why the social network feeds are
usually shown on a vertical basis? This is not happening by chance. The pause time that you make in scrolling
shows that you are more interested in that particular post or that specific person who has posted. Not only pauses,
but also your mouse movements can disclose how you feel and think if you are tempted to comment or like a post,
even though you do not touch any item [1, 2]. Now you may think that you have not joined any social network,
so you are safe. Lets say you are a medium Internet user, thus you should probably communicate with other
Internet users. You may use text, voice, and video in chats, online conference sessions and emails. These features
are usually provided by a company for free or on a monthly payment basis. The law has allowed some governments
(e.g. United Kingdom) to monitor these communication channels. Assuming the old eavesdropping method of
having people sat and listen to the conversations is far beyond the imagination that everybody can believe it today.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is now in charge. Natural Language Processing (NLP) can analyze the user’s text and
extract the required information. Sound Signal Processing can analyze the human voice. Image Processing (IP)
techniques can extract the features and interpret the information from the images and videos. This information
can say how the user is feeling, how important or suspicious a conversation might be, and what the key points are
in their conversations [6, 7].
Well, what if you have a limited use of the Internet? You may only use the Internet to read the news, pay the bills
and do some daily shopping. Have you ever noticed that some famous shopping websites recommend you the
items, as they may know who you are and what you may like? Recommender Systems are widely used in shopping
websites. When a user buys a single item, the system would automatically evaluate multiple criteria such as similar
users’ behavior, the bought item features, geographical and personal features to come up with new
recommendations. It means that the shopping websites do not need us to buy tons of items to learn our preferences
[5]. There is some literature on recommender systems to predict the relevant items to the first-time users.
Besides that, website cookies have a history of discussion on privacy. Cookies are tiny files which a website stores
on our computer. Each time we return, the stored information can be read. The cookies are very important in
tracking our browsing, signing in, remembering the password, etc. Cookies can also be transferred from one
website to another, therefore we can be tracked from one website to another website. When we return to a website
or browse a website for the first time, the website may greet us. That shows we have been tracked. Deleting and
wiping the computer from cookies is not even a good solution to avoid from being tracked. The network IP address
is also used for tracking the geographical location. Although IP address is not usually fixed all the time, they can
reveal information on where the person is located now.
Internet browsing basically includes user’s interaction, mouse movements, keyboard keystrokes, and cookie
tracking. This information is usually gathered and analyzed by corporations to improve their production. For
example, the heat map is a sample which can be used to interpret the user’s interactions. These interpretations can
say what you feel, what you like, and what you are looking for [1, 2].
I believe the big eyes surrounding us as smartphones, tablets, and PDAs are becoming more popular and more
users are joining the club of gadget lovers every day. All these gadgets connect to the Internet, they sync the
information with the Internet servers. They have all users’ main profiles connected together. Smart gadgets
(including computers) which have processors and memory are really smart. They are alive. They know about your
Facebook account, your twitter, your emails, your photos, your cloud files & documents, your current position
(GPS, A-GPS), your contacts, the people you contact with more by different means and applications, and they
know a lot more than we imagine. The smarter the gadget is, the more information and data can be revealed about
a user. There have been some reports that even the mobile phones can be used to eavesdrop the user’s environment
by the governments even when the phone is switched off.
Do we have privacy in the digital world? Kaveh Bakhtiyari Page 3 of 3
People sometimes ask: Why do they need this information? They think that only famous people are tracked and
watched. Maybe the personal information of a single person is not very important except for marketing purposes.
However, according to the prediction and classification methods of data mining, prediction of the future is possible
by analyzing the data. With the amount of data which already exists in social networks (such as Facebook), it is
nearly possible to predict the near future of every single person by considering his/her timeline and classifying
the similar users through collaborative and content-based techniques. This achievement is more incredibly
powerful than we can imagine. Two years ago, Onion News Network announced a fake news that CIA has more
funding for the Facebook program as an information gathering system. Also, Onion News Network announced
that Christopher Sartinsky (a cinematographer, director, and editor), deputy CIA director (a fake position), said
about Facebook: “It is a dream come true for the CIA.
1
Even though it was a fake news on YouTube, but it is
true that the data on Facebook or any other social networks and/or email providers are extremely useful and
valuable for intelligence agencies. As mentioned, it is not all about Facebook or social networks only, but it is all
about the Internet and our digital life.
Being connected to the Internet and having a smartphone in your pocket is equal to being watched with no privacy
regardless of what the privacy statements say. Maybe using the stupid phones (old fashioned phones) and
computers off the Internet would be a better option for those who concern more about privacy. In addition, for
those people who are very strict in their own privacy, being away from all digital gadgets and keeping distance
with all people who use these devices are the only possible solutions to protect their privacy.
However, a question remains. Should we accept the digital life with no or less privacy? Alternatively, should we
keep our privacy by being off the technology?
REFERENCES
[1] K. Bakhtiyari, M. Taghavi, and H. Husain, "Implementation of Emotional-Aware Computer Systems
Using Typical Input Devices," in Intelligent Information and Database Systems. vol. 8397, N. T. Nguyen,
B. Attachoo, B. Trawiński, and K. Somboonviwat, Eds., ed Bangkok, Thailand: Springer International
Publishing, 2014, pp. 364-374.
[2] K. Bakhtiyari, M. Taghavi, and H. Husain, "Hybrid affective computingkeyboard, mouse and touch
screen: from review to experiment," Journal of Neural Computing and Applications, vol. 26, pp. 1277-
1296, 2015.
[3] K. Bakhtiyari and H. Husain, "Fuzzy Model on Human Emotions Recognition," 12th International
Conference on Applications of Computer Engineering, pp. 77-82, 2013.
[4] K. Bakhtiyari and H. Husain, "Fuzzy model of dominance emotions in affective computing," Journal of
Neural Computing and Applications, vol. 25, pp. 1467-1477, 2014.
[5] M. Taghavi, K. Bakhtiyari, and E. Scavino, "Agent-based computational investing recommender
system," Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on Recommender systems, pp. 455-458, 2013.
[6] R. Cowie, "Building the databases needed to understand rich, spontaneous human behaviour," in 8th
IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition, Amsterdam, Netherlands,
2008, pp. 1-6.
[7] R. Cowie, E. Douglas-Cowie, N. Tsapatsoulis, G. Votsis, S. Kollias, W. Fellenz, et al., "Emotion
recognition in human-computer interaction," Signal Processing Magazine, IEEE, vol. 18, pp. 32-80,
2001.
1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8G28TTRjQV0
Article
Despite a rich body of literature on politicisation, knowledge of this process and its driving forces remains limited. Specifically, little empirical analysis has been carried out to assess the impact of focusing events on politicisation within global and seemingly technical venues of policy‐making. Building on existing studies, I conceptualise politicisation as a combination of three components: (1) issue salience, (2) actor expansion and (3) actor diversity. I test the impact of focusing events on the politicisation of one of the most pressing global policy issues of our age: internet regulation, specifically regarding global data protection and internet privacy rules. I use a systematic analysis of news media coverage over a 20‐year period, resulting in an original dataset of 2,100 news articles. Controlling for different factors, my findings reveal that focusing events do contribute to politicisation in technical venues, in particular regarding the actors involved in debates. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
Article
Full-text available
Emotions play an important role in human interactions. They can be integrated into the computer system to make human-computer interaction more effective. Affective Computing is an innovative computational modelling and detecting user’s emotions to optimize system responses in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI). However, there is a trade-off between recognition accuracy and real-time performance in some of the methods such as processing the facial expressions, human voice and body gestures. Other methods lack efficiency and usability in real world applications such as Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Electroencephalography (EEG) signals. To accomplish a reliable, usable and high performance system, this paper proposes an intelligent hybrid approach to recognize users’ emotions by using easily accessible and low computational cost input devices including keyboard, mouse (touch-pad: single touch) and touch screen display (single touch). Using the proposed approach, the system is developed and trained in a supervised mode by Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) techniques. The result shows an increase of accuracy of 6% (93.20%) by SVM in comparison to the currently existing methods. It is a significant contribution to show new directions of future research in emotion recognition, user modelling and emotional intelligence.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
This paper discusses a fuzzy model for multi-level human emotions recognition by computer systems through keyboard keystrokes, mouse and touchscreen interactions. This model can also be used to detect the other possible emotions at the time of recognition. Accuracy measurements of human emotions by the fuzzy model are discussed through two methods; the first is accuracy analysis and the second is false positive rate analysis. This fuzzy model detects more emotions, but on the other hand, for some of emotions, a lower accuracy was obtained with the comparison with the non-fuzzy human emotions detection methods. This system was trained and tested by Support Vector Machine (SVM) to recognize the users' emotions. Overall, this model represents a closer similarity between human brain detection of emotions and computer systems.
Article
Full-text available
To date, most of the human emotion recognition systems are intended to sense the emotions and their dominance individually. This paper discusses a fuzzy model for multilevel affective computing based on the dominance dimensional model of emotions. This model can detect any other possible emotions simultaneously at the time of recognition. One hundred and thirty volunteers from various countries with different cultural backgrounds were selected to record their emotional states. These volunteers have been selected from various races and different geographical locations. Twenty-seven different emotions with their strengths in a scale of 5 were questioned through a survey. Recorded emotions were analyzed with the other possible emotions and their levels of dominance to build the fuzzy model. Then this model was integrated into a fuzzy emotion recognition system using three input devices of mouse, keyboard and the touch screen display. Support vector machine classifier detected the other possible emotions of the users along with the directly sensed emotion. The binary system (non-fuzzy) sensed emotions with an incredible accuracy of 93 %. However, it only could sense limited emotions. By integrating this model, the system was able to detect more possible emotions at a time with slightly lower recognition accuracy of 86 %. The recorded false positive rates of this model for four emotions were measured at 16.7 %. The resulted accuracy and its false positive rate are among the top three accurate human emotion recognition (affective computing) systems.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
Emotions play an important role in human interactions. Human Emotions Recognition (HER - Affective Computing) is an innovative method for detecting user’s emotions to determine proper responses and recommendations in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI). This paper discusses an intelligent approach to recognize human emotions by using the usual input devices such as keyboard, mouse and touch screen displays. This research is compared with the other usual methods like processing the facial expressions, human voice, body gestures and digital signal processing in Electroencephalography (EEG) machines for an emotional-aware system. The Emotional Intelligence system is trained in a supervised mode by Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) techniques. The result shows 93.20% in accuracy which is around 5% more than the existing methods. It is a significant contribution to show new directions of future research in this topical area of emotion recognition, which is useful in recommender systems.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
The fast development of computing and communication has reformed the financial markets' dynamics. Nowadays many people are investing and trading stocks through online channels and having access to real-time market information efficiently. There are more opportunities to lose or make money with all the stocks information available throughout the World; however, one should spend a lot of effort and time to follow those stocks and the available instant information. This paper presents a preliminary regarding a multi-agent recommender system for computational investing. This system utilizes a hybrid filtering technique to adaptively recommend the most profitable stocks at the right time according to investor's personal favour. The hybrid technique includes collaborative and content-based filtering. The content-based model uses investor preferences, influencing macro-economic factors, stocks profiles and the predicted trend to tailor to its advices. The collaborative filter assesses the investor pairs' investing behaviours and actions that are proficient in economic market to recommend the similar ones to the target investor.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
One of the motives for studying faces and gestures is the role that they play in spontaneous, socially rich interaction between humans. If computers are to interact with humans in that mode (or to analyse what they are doing in it), methods of interpreting the non-verbal signals that they use are critical. It is becoming clear that developing those methods requires databases whose complexity is of a very different order from those that are standard elsewhere. Samples cannot be generated to order, because acting does not reproduce the way features are distributed in spontaneous action. Data collections need to be very large, because there are extensive situational, individual, and cultural differences. It is a very large task to provide annotations that adequately capture the meaning of facial expressions or gestures. These problems are not insoluble, but sustained and well-directed efforts are needed to solve them.
Article
Full-text available
Two channels have been distinguished in human interaction: one transmits explicit messages, which may be about anything or nothing; the other transmits implicit messages about the speakers themselves. Both linguistics and technology have invested enormous efforts in understanding the first, explicit channel, but the second is not as well understood. Understanding the other party's emotions is one of the key tasks associated with the second, implicit channel. To tackle that task, signal processing and analysis techniques have to be developed, while, at the same time, consolidating psychological and linguistic analyses of emotion. This article examines basic issues in those areas. It is motivated by the PKYSTA project, in which we aim to develop a hybrid system capable of using information from faces and voices to recognize people's emotions
Building the databases needed to understand rich, spontaneous human behaviourEmotion recognition in human-computer interaction
  • R Cowie
  • R Cowie
  • E Douglas-Cowie
  • N Tsapatsoulis
  • G Votsis
  • S Kollias
  • W Fellenz
R. Cowie, "Building the databases needed to understand rich, spontaneous human behaviour," in 8th IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2008, pp. 1- 6. [7] R. Cowie, E. Douglas-Cowie, N. Tsapatsoulis, G. Votsis, S. Kollias, W. Fellenz, et al., "Emotion recognition in human-computer interaction," Signal Processing Magazine, IEEE, vol. 18, pp. 32-80, 2001.
Fuzzy model of dominance emotions in affective computingAgent-based computational investing recommender system
  • K Bakhtiyari
  • H Husain
  • M Taghavi
  • K Bakhtiyari
  • E Scavino
K. Bakhtiyari and H. Husain, "Fuzzy model of dominance emotions in affective computing," Journal of Neural Computing and Applications, vol. 25, pp. 1467-1477, 2014. [5] M. Taghavi, K. Bakhtiyari, and E. Scavino, "Agent-based computational investing recommender system," Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on Recommender systems, pp. 455-458, 2013. [6]