DataPDF Available

JMP Pro 12 Charts-LaoStudy

Data

JMP Pro 12 Charts-LaoStudy

Predicting effects of water pH and TDS on electrical conductivity (dS/m).
Test: Standard Least Square Regression Model (SLSRM)
Response EC (dS/m)
Effect Summary
Source LogWorth PValue
pH 2.187 0.00649
TDS (ppm) 1.353 0.04441
Actual by Predicted Plot
Summary of Fit
RSquare 0.182876
RSquare Adj 0.156936
Root Mean Square Error 0.004177
Mean of Response 0.018879
Observations (or Sum Wgts) 66
Analysis of Variance
Source DF Sum of
Squares
Mean Square F Ratio
Model 2 0.00024597 0.000123 7.0499
Error 63 0.00109906 0.000017 Prob > F
C. Total 65 0.00134503 0.0017*
Parameter Estimates
Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>|t|
Intercept -0.00126 0.005904 -0.21 0.8317
pH 0.002775 0.000986 2.82 0.0065*
TDS (ppm) 0.0003162 0.000154 2.05 0.0444*
Residual by Predicted Plot
Sorted Parameter Estimates
Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>|t|
pH 0.002775 0.000986 2.82 0.0065*
TDS (ppm) 0.0003162 0.000154 2.05 0.0444*
Prediction Expression
Prediction Profiler
Contour Profiler
Predicting effects of water EC (dS/m) and TDS (ppm).
Test: Standard Least Square Regression Model (SLSRM)
Response TDS (ppm)
Effect Summary
Source LogWorth PValue
EC (dS/m) 1.671 0.02133
Regression Plot
Actual by Predicted Plot
Summary of Fit
RSquare 0.080066
RSquare Adj 0.065692
Root Mean Square Error 3.282833
Mean of Response 11.39394
Observations (or Sum Wgts) 66
Analysis of Variance
Source DF Sum of
Squares
Mean Square F Ratio
Model 1 60.02994 60.0299 5.5702
Error 64 689.72764 10.7770 Prob > F
C. Total 65 749.75758 0.0213*
Parameter Estimates
Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>|t|
Intercept 7.4056009 1.737526 4.26 <.0001*
EC (dS/m) 211.26031 89.51232 2.36 0.0213*
Residual by Predicted Plot
Sorted Parameter Estimates
Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>|t|
EC (dS/m) 211.26031 89.51232 2.36 0.0213*
Prediction Expression
Prediction Profiler
Box-Cox Transformations
Predicting effects of temperature (F) and EC (dS/m) on water pH.
Test: Standard Least Square Regression Model (SLSRM)
Response pH
Whole Model
Effect Summary
Source LogWorth PValue
Temp (F) 5.951 0.00000
EC (dS/m) 2.970 0.00107
Actual by Predicted Plot
Summary of Fit
RSquare 0.403444
RSquare Adj 0.384506
Root Mean Square Error 0.416745
Mean of Response 5.958788
Observations (or Sum Wgts) 66
Analysis of Variance
Source DF Sum of
Squares
Mean Square F Ratio
Model 2 7.399697 3.69985 21.3031
Error 63 10.941606 0.17368 Prob > F
C. Total 65 18.341303 <.0001*
Parameter Estimates
Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>|t|
Intercept -0.724998 1.115471 -0.65 0.5181
Temp (F) 0.0693052 0.012857 5.39 <.0001*
EC (dS/m) 39.008074 11.37533 3.43 0.0011*
Residual by Predicted Plot
Prediction Expression
EC (dS/m) Leverage Plot Temp (F) Leverage Plot
Prediction Profiler
Contour Profiler
Response Evapotranspiration (mm/d)
Regression Plot
Actual by Predicted Plot
Summary of Fit
RSquare 0.999999
RSquare Adj 0.999999
Root Mean Square Error 0.003003
Mean of Response 9.050143
Observations (or Sum Wgts) 70
Analysis of Variance
Source DF Sum of
Squares
Mean Square F Ratio
Model 1 1041.5223 1041.52 1.155e+8
Error 68 0.00061342 9.021e-6 Prob > F
C. Total 69 1041.5229 <.0001*
Lack Of Fit
Source DF Sum of
Squares
Mean Square F Ratio
Lack Of Fit 6 0.00061342 0.000102 .
Pure Error 62 0.00000000 0.000000 Prob > F
Total Error 68 0.00061342 .
Max RSq
1.0000
Parameter Estimates
Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>|t|
Intercept 0.0013483 0.000915 1.47 0.1454
Evaporation (mm/d) 0.9500047 8.841e-5 10745 <.0001*
Residual by Predicted Plot
Sorted Parameter Estimates
Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>|t|
Evaporation (mm/d) 0.9500047 8.841e-5 10745 <.0001*
Prediction Expression
Prediction Profiler

File (1)

Content uploaded by Jenkins Macedo
Author content
Office Document
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.