Content uploaded by Sílvia Caldeira
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Sílvia Caldeira on Jan 21, 2016
Content may be subject to copyright.
religions
Review
The Effect of Prayer on Patients’ Health: Systematic
Literature Review
Talita Prado Simão 1, *, Sílvia Caldeira 2, † and Emilia Campos de Carvalho 1, †
Received: 1 December 2015; Accepted: 12 January 2016; Published: 21 January 2016
Academic Editors: Fiona Timmins and Wilf McSherry
1Ribeirão Preto College of Nursing—EERP-USP, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil;
ecdcava@eerp.usp.br
2School of Nursing, Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Health, Institute of Health Sciences,
Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Palma de Cima, 1649-023 Lisboa, Portugal; scaldeira@ics.lisboa.ucp.pt
*Correspondence: tapsimao@usp.br; Tel.: +55-163-315-3475; Fax: +55-163-315-0518
† These authors contributed equally to this work.
Abstract:
There is increasing interest regarding prayer in healthcare. Prayer is an activity related to
spirituality and religion. Positive outcomes have been identified regarding spirituality in health. This
study aims to investigate the effects on patients’ health of using prayer. A systematic literature review
was conducted in May 2015 and updated in November 2015. Electronic and international databases
were searched and the inclusion criteria were based on PICOS: (Population) patients of any age and
any clinical situation, (Intervention) all types of prayer, (Comparison) ordinary care, (Outcomes) any
health change, (Study type) randomized clinical trials. Neither timeframe nor limitation in language
were considered. A total of 92 papers were identified and 12 were included in the review. Prayer was
considered a positive factor in seven studies, and several positive effects of prayer on health were
identified: reducing the anxiety of mothers of children with cancer; reducing the level of concern of
the participants who believe in a solution to their problem; and providing for the improved physical
functioning of patients who believe in prayer. Prayer is a non-pharmacological intervention and
resource, and should be included in the nursing holistic care aimed at patients’ well-being.
Keywords: faith healing; religion; health; clinical trial; randomized controlled trial
1. Introduction
Health is deemed valuable to human life. The WHO [
1
] definition of health comprises physical,
psychological, and spiritual factors as well as social well-being, and is based on the harmony between
several factors, such as values, culture, age, social background, and the philosophical and religious
beliefs of each person [2].
Religion is defined as a system of symbolic elements and rituals through which people can connect
with the divine or the sacred [
3
,
4
]. Spirituality is a dimension related to finding meaning in life and
answers to fundamental aspects of life through sacred and transcendent experiences [
5
], which are
able to provide health benefits.
Spirituality and religion are positively associated with physical health [
6
]. The literature suggests
beliefs and religious practices are associated with: improved physical and mental health outcomes;
having a beneficial effect on immune function; welfare; higher levels of satisfaction with life; hope;
optimism; lower rates of anxiety and depression [7].
Each person uses cognitive and behavioural strategies, in accordance with their religious beliefs
and how they view the meaning of their life, to overcome adverse situations in life, especially those
involving health. We highlight prayer, among these. The word “prayer“ has two different meanings,
based on the Latin origin prex,precis. It means supplication, the vows and wishes of a superior being
Religions 2016,7, 11; doi:10.3390/rel7010011 www.mdpi.com/journal/religions
Religions 2016,7, 11 2 of 11
that transcends the material space [
8
]. Prayer is considered a particularly important intervention in
spiritual care for those in suffering [
9
]. Several types of prayer are defined in literature. The most used
forms are intercessory prayer and petition prayer. In intercessory prayer, there is no direct contact or
involvement between the individuals who are begging (intercessors) and those who are the target of
the prayer. Petition prayer, on the other hand, is asking for help for oneself [10].
Praying is a spiritual activity often used by patients, which seems to facilitate the health/disease
transition process and promote well-being [
11
]. Prayer is much more than just a resource for promoting
“positive religious/spiritual coping with the situation”. It also promotes hope by providing a connection
with a sacred and self-transcending dimension [
12
]. It is way to connect with self, with others and with
the sacred [
13
]. Although it is common practice in different doctrines, it only began to be studied as
an important tool in health [14] in 1980, as a source of comfort and hope, among other virtues [15].
The scientific community recognises prayer as a complementary therapy and a therapeutic
intervention within holistic assistance and, whether it is intercessory or petition, prayer may be
included in healthcare in several contexts. This is because it helps to solve crises and personal issues
of the elderly, reduces the anxiety of patients undergoing chemotherapy, and improves the spiritual
well-being of cancer patients [
16
–
18
]. However, many questions remain concerning evidence of the
real benefits of prayer on patients’ health.
This study aims to explore the contribution of prayer to the health/disease process and to promote
the integration of prayer in holistic healthcare assistance, by investigating the effects of using prayer
on patients’ health, considering only randomized clinical trials.
2. Method
A systematic literature review was conducted in May 2015 and updated in November 2015 [
19
,
20
].
A protocol was defined to plan the systematic review and included the research question, the
inclusion and exclusion criteria, the search strategy and databases, the data collection instruments
and methods and the criteria for the analysis of the results. The review question was: “What are the
effects of prayer on patients’ health?” The PICOS strategy considered was as follows [
21
]: (Population)
patients of any age and any clinical situation, (Intervention) all types of prayer, (Comparison) ordinary
care, (Outcomes) any health change, (Study type) randomized clinical trials (RCT), according to the
outcome included in research question related to the effect of the prayer.
Electronic and international databases were searched: Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied
Health Literature (CINAHL), Academic Search Premier, Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em
Ciências da Saúde [Latin-American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature] (LILACS), Medline,
Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), and The Cochrane Library. The search strategy was
“prayer” AND “clinical trial”. Such a combination was chosen because it is broad, considering the
focus of interest, and was limited to title, considering the specificity of the theme and the type of study
(RCT). Neither timeframe nor limitation to language were considered.
The search and the analysis of the papers identified in the first search was conducted
independently by two researchers. Data were organised in tables containing: year, author, journal,
sample characteristics (experimental group and control group), assessment method, main outcomes,
and the score according to the Jadad criteria. The purpose of this instrument is to verify the quality of
the clinical data reported in papers, such as the blinding characteristics. The score ranges from 0 to 5,
and results equal or higher than three indicate consistent studies [22].
3. Results
A total of 92 papers were identified. Fifteen duplicates were removed, and 65 were excluded
as they did not meet the inclusion criteria. The final sample for analysis was composed of
12 papers (Figure 1).
Religions 2016,7, 11 3 of 11
Religions2016,7,11
3
Figure1.Studyselectionprocess.
SevenstudieshadbeenconductedintheUSA[23–29],oneinSouthKorea[30],oneinIsrael[31],
oneintheUK[32]andtwodidnotidentifytheorigin[33,34].Thepapershadbeenpublishedin
severalhealthjournals,twoofwhichrelatedtocomplementaryandalternativepractices[22,25].Six
articleshadbeenpublishedoverthepastdecade[23–25,27,33,34]andonlytwointhe1990s[28,32].
Withregardtothetypeofprayer,twostudiesmadeuseofpetitionprayer[24,34]and10of
intercessoryprayer[23,25–33].Therewasastudythatassociatedothertherapieswithintercessory
prayer,suchasmusic,imageguidanceandtherapeutictouch[25].
Inrelationtopopulationandoutcomes,twoarticlesanalysedtheanxietyofmothersofchildren
withcancer[34].Anotherstudyinvestigatedanxietyanddepressioninpatientswithpsychological
disorders[24].Fouranalysedadverseeventsinpatientswithcardiacdisorders[25,27–29],twoof
whichincludedpatientsundergoingcardiacsurgery[25,27].Twohadpregnancyastheresearch
focus:oneinvestigatedthesuccessofinvitrofertilization[30]andtheotherwasrelatedtopregnancy
andlabour[33].Anotherstudyevaluatedtheeffectofprayeronthehealthofpeoplewithacquired
immunodeficiencysyndrome[23].Onestudyanalysedtheemotional/spiritualconcernsofadult
patientsregardingtheirillness[26].Onestudyevaluatedpatientswithbloodstreaminfections
regardingthenumberofdeaths,lengthofstayinhospitalanddurationofhyperthermia[31].Onestudy
investigatedtheclinicalstatusandattitudeofpatientswithpsychologicalorrheumaticdisease[32].
Theresultsshowthatprayerwasconsideredapositivefactorinsevenofthe12
studies[24,26,28,30–32,34].Positiveoutcomescomprisedthereductionofanxietyofmothersof
childrenwithcancer,aswellasadecreaseinthelevelofconcernoftheparticipantswhobelieve
thereisasolutiontotheirproblem,andtheimprovedphysicalfunctioningofindividualswhobelieve
inprayer(Table1).
Figure 1. Study selection process.
Seven studies had been conducted in the USA [
23
–
29
], one in South Korea [
30
], one in Israel [
31
],
one in the UK [
32
] and two did not identify the origin [
33
,
34
]. The papers had been published in several
health journals, two of which related to complementary and alternative practices [
22
,
25
]. Six articles
had been published over the past decade [23–25,27,33,34] and only two in the 1990s [28,32].
With regard to the type of prayer, two studies made use of petition prayer [
24
,
34
] and 10 of
intercessory prayer [
23
,
25
–
33
]. There was a study that associated other therapies with intercessory
prayer, such as music, image guidance and therapeutic touch [25].
In relation to population and outcomes, two articles analysed the anxiety of mothers of children
with cancer [
34
]. Another study investigated anxiety and depression in patients with psychological
disorders [
24
]. Four analysed adverse events in patients with cardiac disorders [
25
,
27
–
29
], two of
which included patients undergoing cardiac surgery [
25
,
27
]. Two had pregnancy as the research
focus: one investigated the success of
in vitro
fertilization [
30
] and the other was related to pregnancy
and labour [
33
]. Another study evaluated the effect of prayer on the health of people with acquired
immunodeficiency syndrome [
23
]. One study analysed the emotional/spiritual concerns of adult
patients regarding their illness [
26
]. One study evaluated patients with bloodstream infections
regarding the number of deaths, length of stay in hospital and duration of hyperthermia [
31
]. One study
investigated the clinical status and attitude of patients with psychological or rheumatic disease [32].
The results show that prayer was considered a positive factor in seven of the 12
studies
[24,26,28,30–32,34]
. Positive outcomes comprised the reduction of anxiety of mothers of children
with cancer, as well as a decrease in the level of concern of the participants who believe there is
a solution to their problem, and the improved physical functioning of individuals who believe in
prayer (Table 1).
The majority of the studies focused on one daily prayer or more than one prayer per
day
[23,24,26–28,32,34]
, during a research period equal to or less than one month [
23
,
25
–
28
,
30
,
33
,
34
].
In two studies, the intercessors had different religious backgrounds (Christians, Protestants, Jews,
Buddhists and Muslims) [25,27].
As regards the methodological quality of the trials included in this review, 11 scored higher than
3 in the Jadad criteria. This instrument includes the participant blinding criteria, but in one of the
studies analysed the participants also performed the intervention and so, because of that, this criteria
was not followed in that instance [34].
Religions 2016,7, 11 4 of 11
Table 1. Synthesis of the research papers included in the review.
Paper Sample Assessment (A)/Intervention (I) Outcomes
Paper 1 [22] IG
Acquired immunodeficiency
syndrome patients: 40
Acquired immunodeficiency
syndrome patients: 38
CG
Acquired immunodeficiency
syndrome patients: 39
(A)
-Generic data (number of clinic visits, consultations and hospitalizations);
-Mood (Profile of Mood States);
-Quality of life (Functional Assessment of Human
Immunodeficiency/Virus—FAIN version 4);
-Illness severity;
- CD4 + T lymphocyte count;
-Triglycerides, cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL), alanine
transaminase (ALT), aspartainine transaminase (AST), bilirubin, alkaline
phosphatase, indicators of toxicity antiretroviral therapy.
(I)
-Intercessory prayer was performed for one hour every day during 20
weeks. The intercessor imagined the patient and asked for them to be cured.
-One IG with Intercessor Nurse Healers;
-One IG with Intercessor Professional Healers.
-After 6 months there was a reduction in the absolute count of
CD4 + lymphocyte in the IG (p= 0.02) compared to the CG;
-After 12 months triglyceride levels had a reduction in GI
compared to CG (´82.6 mg/dL vs. 8.6 mg/dL, p= 0.028).
Paper 2 [23] Patients with depressive disorders
and anxiety: 27 Patients with depressive disorders
and anxiety: 36 (A)
-Hamilton Rating Scales for Depression and Anxiety;
-Life Orientation Test;
-Daily Spiritual Experiences Scale;
-Cortisol;
(I)
-Six weeks of prayer;
-First intercessory prayer session lasted 90 minutes; and 60 minutes for the
remaining sessions;
-Intervention by a minister trained in healing prayer through Christian
Healing Ministries. Based on the patient’s history the minister used a
secular prayer (asking for pain relief and blessings);
-The minister was often with the participant during the intervention.
-IG showed significant improvement in anxiety and depression,
as well as more daily spiritual experiences and optimism
compared to CG (p< 0.01);
-Patients kept these results during one month after receiving
the intervention (p< 0.01).
Paper 3 [24] 371 Patients undergoing
percutaneous coronary intervention
or elective catheterisation
189 received prayer, music, image
guidance and healing touch;
182 only received prayer.
377 did not receive prayer; 185 had
the music, image and touch
intervention, and 192 received only
regular care
(A)
-Presence of adverse cardiovascular events readmission and/or death, at
hospital discharge and six months afterwards;
-Critical cardiovascular events such as a new myocardial infarction assessed
by electrocardiogram or increased creatine phosphokinase.
(I)
-The 12 prayer groups involving Christians, Muslims, Jews and Buddhists
were informed of the patients’ name, age and health condition.
-Each group was responsible for the content, schedule and duration of
prayers (ranging from 5 to 30 days).
-The unique use of prayer had no significant outcome on the
clinical evolution of the groups, and the Odd Ratio was 0.97
(0.77–1.24) p= 0.8351, at confidence interval of 95%;
-After six months, death and readmission was 0.93 (0.72–1.19)
p= 0.5220, major cardiovascular event 0.85 (0.63 – 1.14) 0.2785
and death 1.13 (0.53 – 2.4) p= 0.7531.
Religions 2016,7, 11 5 of 11
Table 1. Cont.
Paper Sample Assessment (A)/Intervention (I) Outcomes
Paper 4 [25] Men and women aged 18-88 years
who attended the Presbyterian
Church: 45
Men and women aged 18-88 years
who attended the Presbyterian
Church: 41
(A)
-Rating scales to assess prayers outcomes (1–4 and 1–5);
-Medical Outcomes Study SF-20 (components: physical functioning, pain
and mental health).
-All data were collected before and after the intervention.
(I)
-12 intercessor volunteers, who received the patient’s first name and a
written summary of their concerns and problems. They recorded how often
and how long they prayed, and whether they were or not using a script
about what was asked in prayer. Each group was asked to pray once a day
for a month, targeting at least one or two participants. The average was
twice a day and a duration of 3 minutes.
-Prayer decreases the level of concern of the participants who
believe in a solution to their problem;
-Prayer was related to better physical functioning (p< 0.002) for
participants who believe in prayer.
Paper 5 [26] Patients undergoing coronary
artery bypass
601 were aware they were receiving
the intervention
604 did not know if they were or
were not receiving the intervention
Patients undergoing coronary
artery bypass
597 did not know if they were or
were not receiving the intervention
-Postoperative complication among 30 (Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult
Cardiac Surgery Database);
-Any major event (defined by the New York State Cardiac Surgery
Reporting System);
-30-day mortality.
(I)
-Three groups (two Catholic and one Protestant) which had access to a list
of patients;
-The prayer was said at 0:00 pm the day before the surgery, and lasted for 14
consecutive days.
-52% of patients of IG who were not aware if they were
receiving prayers (315/604) had complications compared to
51% (304/597) of patients of CG (relative risk 1.02,
95% CI 0.92–1.15);
-59% of patients of IG who knew they were receiving prayer
had complications (352/601) compared to patients of IG who
did not know if they were receiving intercessory prayer
(relative risk 1.14, 95% CI 1.02–1.28);
-30-day mortality after surgery was similar for the three groups.
Paper 6 [27] Patients admitted to the CCU: 484 Patients admitted to the CCU: 529 (A)
-Collected information;
-Comorbidities;
-Length of stay in CCU;
-Clinical outcomes.
(I)
- 15 teams with five intercessors who were given the participants’ first name;
- Daily intercessory prayer over a four-week period.
-Patients of IG had lower weighted average when compared to
CG (6.35 ˘7.13 vs. 0.26 ˘0.27; p= 0.04) and unweighted
average (2.7 ˘0.1 vs. 3.0 ˘0.1; p= 0.04) considering the days
patients were in Coronary Care Unit;
-The length of stay in CCU was similar.
Religions 2016,7, 11 6 of 11
Table 1. Cont.
Paper Sample Assessment (A)/Intervention (I) Outcomes
Paper 7 [28]
Patients with cardiovascular disease
after hospital discharge: 400
Patients with cardiovascular disease
after hospital discharge: 349 (A)
-Death, heart failure, readmission or emergency department attendance, and
coronary revascularization.
-Three groups of patients were clustered according to risk: high risk (age =
70 years, diabetes mellitus, previous myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular
disease or peripheral vascular disease), and low risk (no risk factors).
(I)
-Intercessory prayer was held once a week for 26 weeks;
-215 intercessors were divided into five groups ranging from 1 to 65;
-Intercessor groups prayed for 1-100 patients who were randomly
distributed;
-Intercessors were provided with the name, age, gender, diagnosis, and
patients’ health status.
-There was at least one event in the IG and CG (25.6%) and the
control group (29.3%) (odds ratio [OR], 0.83 [95% confidence
interval (CI) 0.60–1.14]; p= 0:25);
-31.0% of patients of the IG had primary outcomes vs. 33.33% of
CG (OR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.60–1.34] p= 0.60);
-The incidence of primary outcomes in low risk patients of IG
was 17.0% vs. 24.1% in the CG (OR, 0.65 [95% CI, 0:20 to 1:36];
p= 0:12).
Paper 8 [29] IVF Women: 88 IVF Women: 81 (A)
-Pregnancy rate;
-Implantation rate;
-Number of babies.
(I)
-Intercessory prayer five days after treatment beginning and lasted for three
weeks;
-Each prayer group consisted of 3 to 13 intercessors that prayed for five
patients asking for an increased pregnancy rate.
-IG had a higher pregnancy rate compared to CG (46.6% vs.
22.2%, p< 0.001);
-IG had a higher implantation rate (16.3% vs. 8%, p= 0.0005)
and multiple babies (17% vs. 4.9%, p= 0.0126).
Paper 9 [30] Patients with bloodstream
infection:1961 Patients with bloodstream
infection: 1702 (A)
-Number of deaths;
-Length of stay in hospital from day one of a positive blood-culture;
-Length of hyperthermia (temperature > 37.5 ˝C).
(I)
-Intercessors had a list with the first names of the patients of the IG. They
asked for their well-being and full recovery.
-IG had lower number of deaths [28.1% (475/1691)] compared
to the CG [30.2% (514/1702) (p= 0.4);
-Regarding the length of stay in hospital and duration of fever,
IG had significantly fewer events than the CG (p= 0.01 and
p= 0.04, respectively).
Religions 2016,7, 11 7 of 11
Table 1. Cont.
Paper Sample Assessment (A)/Intervention (I) Outcomes
Paper 10 [31] Patients with rheumatic or
psychological disease: 24 Patients with rheumatic or
psychological disease: 24 (A)
-Clinical State Scale;
-Attitude State Scale;
(Two times in consultation and after about 6 to 8 months).
(I)
-Six groups with 19 intercessors who were given participants’ first name;
-Participation of all the 19 people involved in prayer, two as lone
individuals and the rest were divided into 4 groups:
-The group prayers were held once every two weeks, for one hour;
-Individual prayer was conducted every day for 15 minutes;
-Each patient received an average of 15 hours of prayer for a minimum
period of 6 months.
The prayer method used was silent meditation in which the intercessor
focused all his attention on a short phrase that expresses some positive
affirmation about God, which is most often obtained from the Bible.
Both instruments had similar results, but patients in IG had
better results compared to the CG.
Paper 11 [32] Pregnant women with gestational
age of 37 weeks: 281 Pregnant women with gestational
age of 37 weeks: 285 (A)
-Type of delivery;
-Apgar score;
-Birth weight and macrossomy.
-Age;
-Gestational age;
-Associated diseases;
-Belief in God and religion.
(All variables were dichotomized).
(I)
-The intercessors group was composed of six women, coordinated by a
theologian. They asked for good delivery and health of the newborn, over
nine consecutive days.
-Both IG and CG had a similar number of serious adverse
events: spontaneous abortion (p= 0.53), intrauterine foetal
death and (p= 0.30), low Apgar score (p= 0.34), preterm birth
(p= 0.33), small size for gestational age (p= 0.62), macrossomy
(p= 0.09), caesarean delivery (p= 0.68) and malformation
(p= 0.99).
Paper 12 [33] Mothers of children hospitalized
with cancer: 30 Mothers of children hospitalized
with cancer: 30 (A)
-Inventory of Spielberger’s State Anxiety.
(Data were collected at three times: before, after the intervention and
21 days after prayers had ended).
(I)
-The petition prayer was said three times a day for three weeks by the
participants, who were instructed to go to the religious temple/space in the
hospital to connect with God through prayer.
-After the intervention the difference between the anxiety
averages in both groups was significant (p= 0.001);
-IG had significant reduction in anxiety (CG: 58.93
˘
9.8 and IG:
40.96 ˘12.4).
-No difference between the pre and post intervention groups
(p= 0.001).
Religions 2016,7, 11 8 of 11
4. Discussion
The concepts of religion and spirituality comprise different dimensions (affective, cognitive and
behavioural), and prayer is considered an expression of the behavioural dimension [35].
Adults who are dealing with negative life issues and stressful situations often use prayer.
Intercessory prayer was used more in this study than petition prayer, which is in harmony with
previous research [
28
,
36
]. Using intercessory prayer in research could provide the researchers better
conditions to control bias, as this type of research involving such subjective variables could be quite
challenging. On the other hand, asking patients to pray, in case of using petition prayer, depends on
patients’ health conditions and this may arise ethical questions regarding the guarantee of the principle
of justice. These may constitute important aspects to take into consideration when planning RCTSs
using prayer, as there should be always the guarantee of respecting patients’ beliefs and wishes.
The interest in research about prayer is recent, although it has been used in healing processes since
ancient times. The literature highlights that in both the twentieth century and the twenty-first century
there has been growing interest in examining the effect of prayer on diseases or health disturbances
such as anxiety, depression, stress and heart disease [24,28,37,38].
The literature suggests that prayer is recognised as a complementary intervention or alternative
therapy identified by healthcare professionals as adequate treatment for religious/spiritual
disturbances or concerns, because patients considered it significant when it was used [
39
]. In a
holistic paradigm and patient centered care all patients’ dimensions should be considered and all
needs should be addressed, and this is often included in professional ethical codes and main health
policies. Even when physicians or nurses (as those that are more in contact with the patients) feel they
are unprepared to pray with patients, the presence of religious leaders or chaplains should be requested
as they are member of the multidisciplinary healthcare team. The results of this review show that
the use of prayer, whether petition or intercessory, in clinical practice may promote different positive
effects such as the reduction of anxiety and depression; a higher implantation rate for successful and
multiple pregnancies; better physical functioning; fewer deaths in patients with bloodstream infections;
fewer days in the Coronary Care Unit for patients with cardiac problems. Considering that prayer is
a non-pharmacological intervention, these results arise questions regarding health economy, and thus
more research is needed in order to identify the economic outcomes when implementing this kind
of interventions in regard of the sustainability of the healthcare systems. But the implementation of
prayer as an intervention should be based in training, as this includes dealing with patients’ intimacy,
values and beliefs.
It should be noted with regard to the practice of prayer, particularly intercessory prayer, that
each study used a different frequency, duration and assessment method. Most of the 10 studies
applied prayer over a period of time of less than one month [
23
,
25
–
28
,
30
,
33
,
34
] and on a daily
basis
[23,24,26–28,32,34]
. Most studies used assessment tools [
24
,
26
,
32
,
34
]. These differences may
reinforce the argument that positive findings and more accurate studies and evidence are jeopardized.
This means there is a need to standardise interventions to minimise methodological limitations in
future studies about prayer [40].
According to the Jadad criteria used to assess the methodological accuracy of clinical trials, the
studies that scored three or higher in this review were considered to show positive results in terms of
the effect of prayer on health, and so they could be considered reliable and having methodological
consistency. This is an important aspect because clinical trials determine and evaluate the effectiveness
of new therapies and interventions [
41
] and seems to be an adequate method to further research
looking for the effect of prayer.
5. Conclusions
Different therapies and interventions have been developed to help patients to cope when dealing
with health problems. Prayer is an activity that is widely used and investigated as a therapeutic and
adequate intervention in healthcare. However, more evidence is needed regarding positive health
Religions 2016,7, 11 9 of 11
outcomes for it to be effectively implemented as such, through studies that have good methodological
accuracy. This review only included RCTs and did not include grey literature, and this may constitute
a publication bias that should be considered when analysing the results, as the search that was limited
to the title as well.
Consistency in the results was found and prayer, whether petition or intercessory, seems to
help patients to cope in times of illness and crisis. This conclusion underlines the need to conduct
research that seeks to further evaluate the benefits of prayer on patients’ health. It also emphasizes the
importance of the integration of prayer in clinical practice, according to the patients and professionals’
boundaries and competencies, aiming for effective holistic care. Healthcare professionals should
consider patients’ spirituality and religious needs and need to be prepared to provide that support. This
highlight the need for education and training based on an ethical background that is paramount when
dealing with religiosity or spirituality. Healthcare teams should consider prayer as an intervention, as
this is an example of the holistic paradigm in health and the effects of such an intervention should be
considered in a multidisciplinary and patient-centered approach.
Author Contributions:
Talita Prado Simão, Sílvia Caldeira, and Emilia Campos de Carvalho conceived and
designed the review, analysed the data, and wrote the paper.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Abbreviations
The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
IG
Intervention Group
IVF
In vitro Fertilisation
CG
Control Group
CCU
Coronary Care Unit
RCT
Randomized Clinical Trials
WHO
World Health Organization
References
1.
World Health Organization. WHOQOL and Spirituality, Religiousness and Personal Beliefs (SRPB). Geneva:
World Health Organization, 1998.
2. Moacyr Scliar. “História do Conceito de saúde.” Revista Saúde Coletiva 17 (2007): 29–41. [CrossRef]
3.
Ramon Moraes Penha, and Maria Júlia Paes da Silva. “Meaning of spirituality for critical care nursing.”
Texto Contexto Enfermagem 21 (2012): 260–68. [CrossRef]
4.
Rogério Rodrigues da Silva, and Deis Siqueira. “Spirituality, religion and work in the organizational context.”
Psicologia em Estudo 14 (2009): 557–64. [CrossRef]
5.
Nilvete Soares Gomes, Marianne Farina, and Cristiano Dal Forno. “Espiritualidade, Religiosidade e Religião:
Reflexão de Conceitos em Artigos Psicológicos.” Revista de Psicologia da IMED 6 (2014): 107–12. [CrossRef]
6.
Heather S. L. Jim, James E. Pustejovsky, Crystal L. Park, Suzanne C. Danhauer, Allen C. Sherman,
George Fitchett, Thomas V. Merluzzi, Alexis R. Munoz, Login George, Mallory A. Snyder, and et al. “Religion,
Spirituality, and Physical Health in Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis.” Cancer 121 (2015): 3760–68. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
7.
Raquel G. Panzini, and Denise R. Bandeira. “Spiritual/religious coping.” Revista Psiquiatria Clínica 34 (2007):
126–35. [CrossRef]
8.
João P. Cabral. “A prece revisitada: Comemorando a obra inacabada de Marcel Mauss.” Religião e Sociedade
29 (2009): 13–28.
9.
Jaqueline Lopes, Mônica R. Lira, Gina A. Abdala, and Alberto M. S. Oliveira. “O impacto da reabilitação
aquática associada à oração no desempenho funcional de pacientes pós-acidente vascular encefálico.”
Saúde Coletiva 37 (2010): 9–14.
10.
Silvia Caldeira. “Cuidado espiritual–rezar como intervenção de enfermagem.” CuidArteEnfermagem 3 (2009):
157–64.
Religions 2016,7, 11 10 of 11
11.
Mary Rute G. Esperandio, and Kevin L. Ladd. “I Heard the Voice. I Felt the Presence: Prayer, Health and
Implications for Clinical Practice.” Religions 6 (2015): 670–85. [CrossRef]
12. Tosta Carlos Eduardo. “Does prayer heal? ” Brasília Médica 34 (2004): 38–45.
13.
Kevin L. Ladd, and Bernard Spilka. “Prayer: A Review of the empirical literature.” In APA Handbook
of Psychology, Religion, and Spirituality. Washington: American Psychological Association, 2013, vol. 1,
pp. 293–307.
14.
Hélio P. Guimarães, and Álvaro Avezum. “O impacto da espiritualidade na saúde física.”
Revista Psiquiatria Clínica 34 (2007): 88–94. [CrossRef]
15.
Judith M. Wilkinson, and Karen van Leuven. “Fundamentos de Enfermagem: Teoria, Conceitos e
Aplicações.” Avaiable online: http://www.livronauta.com.br/ livro-Judith_M_Wilkinson_Karen_Van
_Leuven-Fundamentos_de_Enfermagem_Teoria_Conceitos_e_Aplicacoes_2_Volumes-Roca-Sebo_Releitur
as_Portao-Curitiba-22954770 (accessed on 18 January 2016).
16.
Camila C. Carvalho, Erika C. L. Chaves, Denise H. Iunes, Talita P. Simão, Cristiane S. M. Grasselli, and
Cristiane G. Braga. “The effectiveness of prayer in reducing anxiety in cancer patients.” Revista da Escola de
Enfermagem da USP 48 (2014): 683–89. [CrossRef]
17.
Leoni Zenevicz, Yukio Moriguchi, and Valéria S. Faganello Madureira. “The religiosity in the process of
living getting old.” Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP 47 (2013): 433–39. [CrossRef]
18.
Ian N. Olver, and Andrew Dutney. “A Randomized, Blinded Study of the Impact of Intercessory Prayer on
Spiritual Well-being in Patients With Cancer.” Alternative Therapies 18 (2012): 18–27.
19.
David Evans. “Systematic reviews of nursing research.” Intensive and Critical Care Nursing 17 (2001): 51–57.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
20. Joanna Briggs Institute. Reviewers’ Manual. Adelaide: Joanna Briggs Institute, 2014.
21.
Cristina M. C. Santos, Cibele A. M. Pimenta, and Moacyr R. C. Nobre. “The pico strategy for the research
question construction and evidence search.” Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem 15 (2007): 508–11.
[CrossRef]
22.
Alejandro R. Jadad, Andrew R. Moore, Dawn Carroll, Crispin Jenkinson, John D. Reynolds, David
J. Gavaghan, and Henry J. McQuayj. “Assesing the Quality of Reports of randomized Clinical Trials:
Is Blinding Necessary? ” Controlled Clinical Trials 17 (1996): 1–12. [CrossRef]
23.
John A. Astin, Jerome Stone, Donald I. Abrams, Dan H. Moore, Paul Couey, Raymond Buscemi, and
Elisabeth Targ. “The efficacy of distant healing for human immunodeficiency virus—Results of a randomized
trial.” Alternative Therapies 12 (2006): 36–42.
24.
Peter A. Boelens, Roy R. Reeves, William H. Replogle, and Harold G. Koenig. “A randomized trial of the
effect of prayer on depression and anxiety.” The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine 39 (2009):
377–92. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
25.
Mitchell W Krucoff, Suzanne W Crater, Dianne Gallup, James C Blankenship, Michael Cuffe, Mimi Guarneri,
Richard A Krieger, Vib R Kshettry, Kenneth Morris, Mehmet Oz, and et al. “Music, imagery, touch, and
prayer as adjuncts to interventional cardiac care: The Monitoring and Actualisation of Noetic Trainings
(MANTRA) II randomised study.” Lancet 36 (2005): 211–17.
26.
Raymond F. Palmer, David Katerndahl, and Jayne Morgan-Kidd. “A Randomized Trial of the Effects of
Remote Intercessory Prayer: Interactions with Personal Beliefs on Problem-Specific Outcomes and Functional
Status.” The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine 10 (2004): 438–48. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
27.
Herbert Benson, Jeffery A. Dusek, Jane B. Sherwood, Peter Lam, Charles F. Bethea, William Carpenter,
Sidney Levitsky, Peter C. Hill, Donald W. Clem Jr., Manoj K. Jain, and et al. “Study of the Therapeutic Effects
of Intercessory Prayer (STEP) in cardiac bypass patients: A multicenter randomized trial of uncertainty and
certainty of receiving intercessory prayer.” American Heart Journal 151 (2006): 934–42. [CrossRef]
28.
William S. Harris, Manohar Gowda, Jerry W. Kolb, Christopher P. Strychacz, James L. Vacek, Philip
G. Jones, Alan Forker, James H. O’Keefe, and Ben D. McCallister. “A randomized controlled trial of
the effects of remote intercessory prayer on outcomes in patients admitted to the coronary care unit.”
Archives International Medicine 159 (1999): 2273–78. [CrossRef]
29.
Jennifer M. Aviles, Ellen Whelan, Debra A. Hernke, Brent A. Williams, Kathleen E. Kenny, Michael O’ Fallon,
and Stephen L. Kopecky. “Intercessory prayer and cardiovascular disease progression in a coronary care unit
population: A randomized controlled trial.” Mayo Clinic Proceedings 76 (2001): 1192–98. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Religions 2016,7, 11 11 of 11
30.
Kwang Y. Cha, Daniel P. Wirth, and Rogerio A. Lobo. “Does Prayer Influence the Success of in Vitro
Fertilization–Embryo Transfer? Report of a Masked, Randomized Trial.” Journal of Reproductive Medicine 46
(2001): 781–87. [PubMed]
31.
Leonard Leibovici. “Effects of remote, retroactive intercessory prayer on outcomes in patients with
bloodstream infection: Randomised controlled trial.” British Medical Journal 323 (2001): 1450–51. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
32.
C. R. Joyce, and R. M. Welldon. “The objective efficacy of prayer: A double-blind clinical trial.” Journal of
Chronic Diseases 18 (1965): 367–77. [CrossRef]
33.
Maria I. Rosa, Fabio R. Silva, Bruno R. Silva, Luciana C. Costa, Angela M. Bergamo, Napoleão C. Silva, Lidia
R. F. Medeiros, Iara D. E. Battisti, and Rafael Azevedo. “A randomized clinical trial on the effects of remote
intercessory prayer in the adverse outcomes of pregnancies.” Ciência & Saúde Coletiva 18 (2013): 2379–84.
[CrossRef]
34.
K. H. Dehghani, A. Zare Rahimabadi, Z. Pourmovahed, H. Dehghani, A. Zarezadeh, and Z. Namjou.
“The Effect of Prayer on Level of Anxiety in Mothers of Children with Cancer.” Iranian Journal of Pediatric
Hematology Oncology 12 (2012): 1–6.
35.
John M. Salsman George Fitchett, Thomas V. Merluzzi, Allen C. Sherman, and Crystal L. Park. “Religion,
spirituality, and health outcomes in cancer: A case for a metaanalytic investigation.” Cancer 121 (2015):
3754–59.
36.
John A. Astin, Elaine Harkness, and Edzar Ernst. “The efficacy of distant healing: A systematic review of
randomized trials.” Annals of Internal Medicine 6 (2000): 903–10. [CrossRef]
37.
David Brain Wolf. “Effects of the Hare Krsna Maha Mantra on Stress, Depression and the Three Gunas.”
Ph.D. Thesis, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA, 1999.
38.
Kuciano Bernardi, Peter Sleight, Gabriele Bandinelli, Simone Cencetti, Lamberto Fattorini,
Johanna Wdowczyc-Szulc, and Afonso Lagi. “Effect of rosary prayer and yoga mantras on autonomic
cardiovascular rhythms: Comparative study.” BMJ 323 (2001): 1446–49.
39.
Suzette Brémault-Phillips, Joanne Olson, Pamela Brett-MacLean, Doreen Oneschuk, Shane Sinclair,
Ralph Magnus, Jeanne Wei, Marjan Abbasi, Jasneet Parmar, and Christina M. Puchalski. “Integrating
Spirituality as a Key Component of Patient Care.” Religions 6 (2015): 476–98. [CrossRef]
40.
Maria Inês Rosa, Fábio R. Silva, and Napoleão C. Silva. “A oração intercessória no alívio de doenças.”
Arquivos Catarinenses de Medicina 36 (2007): 103–8.
41.
Teresa C. Camargo. “The role of the nurse participation in clinical trials: A review of the literature.” Revista
Brasileira de Cancerologia 48 (2002): 569–76.
©
2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons by Attribution
(CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
