ArticlePDF Available

A new species of Megalocoleus (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Miridae: Phylinae) from Morocco

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Megalocoleus stysi sp. nov. is described from Morocco and its habitus and male and female genitalia are illustrated. An amendment to the key for Megalocoleus Reuter, 1890, is proposed.
Content may be subject to copyright.
ACTA ENTOMOLOGICA MUSEI NATIONALIS PRAGAE
Published 8.xii.2008 Volume 48(2), pp. 419-422 ISSN 0374-1036
A new species of Megalocoleus (Hemiptera: Heteroptera:
Miridae: Phylinae) from Morocco
Armand MATOCQ
Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Département Systématique & Évolution (Entomologie), C.P. 50,
45 rue Buffon, F-75 231 Paris cedex 05, France; e-mail: matocq.armand@wanadoo.fr
Abstract. Megalocoleus stysi sp. nov. is described from Morocco and its habi-
tus and male and female genitalia are illustrated. An amendment to the key for
Megalocoleus Reuter, 1890, is proposed.
Key words. Heteroptera, Miridae, Phylinae, Megalocoleus stysi sp. nov., genitalia,
key, Morocco
Introduction
The important collection of Eckerlein preserved in the Natural History Museum of Gene-
va (MHNG) is essential for the study of numerous Palaearctic mirid species and sometimes
brings surprises. During the study of a large quantity of specimens collectively identi ed
as ‘Amblytylus’, I encountered a small series of a new species of the genus Megalocoleus
Reuter, 1890.
This genus is strictly Palaearctic (SCHUH 1995, KERZHNER & JOSIFOV 1999). The 24 described
species assigned to it were recently re-examined by MATOCQ (2004), and after establishing
seven synonymies, one new combination, and one restoration of species status, the number
of species belonging to Megalocoleus decreased to 14. Most of them are characterised mainly
by the male genitalia.
The new species is described below, including a modi cation to the recently published key
to Megalocoleus species (MATO CQ 2004). The species is warmly dedicated to Pavel Štys.
Results
Megalocoleus stysi sp. nov.
(Figs. 1-10)
Type locality. Morocco, Kenitra, Foręt de Mamora.
Type material. HOLOTYPE: , ‘Morocco / Kenitra / Forêt de Mamora / 5-V-1967 / Eckerlein leg.’ (MHNG). PARATYPES:
2  6 , same data as holotype (MHNG); 1 1 , same data as holotype (coll. Matocq). The 11 specimens of
the type series have lost most of their vestiture; setae can only be observed in places.
MATOCQ: A new species of Megalocoleus from Morocco
420
Description (both sexes). Integument rather mat, body and appendages entirely greyish
yellow except the last segment of rostrum and the last tarsal segments and claws of all legs,
which are black. Dorsal vestiture with two types of setae of unknown distribution (see the
note above), ne and adpressed pale setae and semi-erect dark setae observed along lateral
margin of hemelytra and on cuneus). Length ( and ) = 3.8-4.5 mm.
Head short, not elongated (Fig. 2); length of antennal segments: I – 0.35 mm, II –1.1 mm,
III – 0.9 mm, IV – 0.45 mm (Fig. 3). Rostrum reaching the middle of abdominal sternite
VIII.
Pronotum trapezoidal with slightly carinate lateral margin; xyphus concave and carinate.
Hemelytra slightly translucent with more or less darkend spot in the middle (more pro-
nounced in females); membrane smoky transparent with white veins.
Legs: femora without black spots; tibiae with black spines; tarsi: segments I and II greyish
yellow, segment III and claw black; hind tarsi: segments II and III of hind tarsus subequal in
length (Fig. 4); claws as in Fig. 5.
Fig. 1. Megalocoleus stysi sp. nov. Habitus of male and female.
Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae, 48(2), 2008 421
Genitalia. Male: vesica slender, U-shaped; with a thin, straight and acute apex (Fig. 6);
secondary gonopore removed far from apex of vesica (Fig. 7); left paramere as in Fig. 8.
Female: vagina large and oval (Fig. 9). Ring sclerites subtriangular (Fig. 10).
Differential diagnosis. Megalocoleus stysi sp. nov. shows some similarities with M. lunula
(Fieber, 1861) in the colouration and vestiture but differs from the latter species in the structure
of the vesica. The vesica of M. stysi sp. nov. is thin with a straight apex and the secondary
gonopore is removed far from the apex of the vesica, while the vesica of M. lunula is thicker
with a curved apex and subapically placed secondary gonopore. The vesica of M. stysi sp. nov.
is similar to that of M. krueperi (Reuter, 1879), but the latter species is easily distinguished
by its general shape, short and incrassate antennae, and vestiture (see MATOCQ 2004).
Megalocoleus stysi sp. nov. runs to couplet 12 in the key presented by MATOCQ (2004). A
third choice can be added at that point to accommodate M. stysi sp. nov. in the key. Asterisk
(*) means that an examination of the male genitalia is necessary to identify the species with
certainty.
Figs. 2-10. Megalocoleus stysi sp. nov. (male holotype: 2 to 8). 2 – head, lateral view; 3 – antenna; 4 – hind tarsus;
5 – claw; 6 – vesica, lateral view; 7 – apex of vesica, different angle; 8 – left paramere; 9 – vagina, dorsal view; 10
– detail of left ring sclerite of vagina.
MATOCQ: A new species of Megalocoleus from Morocco
422
12. Second segment of antenna slender, at least 1.5 mm long. Female: pubescence generally
pale dense and ne, dark hairs sparse. Male: pubescence brownish, exible, not dense.
Rostrum in both sexes very long, reaching or even surpassing posterior end of abdomen.
Large species. ................................................................ *M. longirostris (Fieber, 1861)
Second segment of antenna much shorter, 1.1 mm long; apex of rostrum reaching middle
of abdominal segment VIII. ............................................................... *M. stysi sp. nov.
Second segment of antenna shorter, 1.25 mm long. .................................................... 13
13. Brown pubescence dense, hairs thick; pale pubescence sparse and ne. Apex of rostrum
surpassing abdominal segment VIII (male) or reaching its basal quarter (female). Corium
sometimes with a round, more or less pronounced mark. ..... *M. lunula (Fieber, 1861)
Brown and pale pubescence ne and rather dense, evenly distributed. Apex of rostrum
surpassing abdominal segment VIII (male) or reaching its middle (female). Cuneus
sometimes orange. ................................................................... *M. naso (Reuter, 1879)
Etymology. The species is dedicated to Prof. Pavel Štys on the occasion of his 75th birthday
and in recognition of his important contribution to our knowledge of the Heteroptera.
Distribution. Northwestern Morocco.
Discussion
Specimens of Megalocoleus are commonly mixed in collections with specimens belonging
to other similar genera, in particular with Amblytylus Fieber, 1858 (and vice versa). I have
already mentioned the dif culties of separating these two and other genera such as Tinice-
phalus Fieber, 1858 (MATOCQ 2004), which are due to the insuf cient de nition of generic
characters. Megalocoleus stysi sp. nov. exhibits all the external characters previously listed
for the genus in a provisional diagnosis (MATO CQ 2004: 71): the general colouration, shape
of the head, comparative length of the tarsal segments, and morphology of the claws. Only
one character (lateral margin of the pronotum slightly carinate) does not t well with the
de nition of the genus. However, the most important diagnostic character is the form of the
vesica (Figs. 6 and 7).
Acknowledgments
I am very grateful to P. Schwendinger, C. Lienhard and J. Hollier (all MHNG) for the loan
of mirid specimens and kind support during my different stays at MHNG. I would also like
to thank J. Hollier for checking the English text, G. Hodebert (Paris) for the drawing of Fig.
1, and F. V. Konstantinov (St. Petersburg, Russia) and S. Pagola-Carte (Donostia, Spain) for
valuable comments on the manuscript.
References
KERZHNER I. M. & JOSIFOV M. 1999: Miridae Hahn, 1933. Pp. 1-577. In: AUKEMA B. & RIEGER Ch. (eds):
Catalogue of the Heteroptera of the Palaearctic Region. Volume 3. Cimicomorpha II. The Netherlands Entomo-
logical Society, Amsterdam, xiv + 577 pp.
MATOCQ A. 2004: Revue des espèces attribuées au genre Megalocoleus Reuter, 1890 (Heteroptera: Miridae). An-
nales de la Société Entomologique de France (N. S.) 40: 69-101.
SCHUH R. T. 1995: Plant bugs of the world (Insecta: Heteroptera: Miridae): Systematic catalog, distributions, host
list, and bibliography. The New York Entomological Society, New York, xii + 1329 pp.
... L'examen des genitalia mâles est indispensable pour identifi er correctement les espèces dont l'habitus est très semblable ; c'est le cas pour longirostris, lunula, naso, stysi et surtout pour molliculus et mellae, deux espèces quasi indiscernables. Dans cette clé, nous renvoyons aux fi gures données par Matocq (2004bMatocq ( , 2008) de la façon suivante : (M. 2004b, fi g. 00 ; M. 2008 : fi g. 00) et aux fi gures du présent travail par : (fi g. 00). 1. Face inférieure des procoxae pourvue de fortes soies noires érigées, plus ou moins alignées, sans soies claires notables. ...
Article
Full-text available
Les vingt-deux espèces actuellement répertoriées dans le genre paléarctique Amblytylus Fieber ont été examinées. Le genre est redéfini principalement d’après les caractères des genitalia mâles. Dix espèces sont maintenues dans le genre: A. albidus (Hahn 1834), A. amoenus Wagner 1958, A. arnoldiorum Kerzhner 1977, A. brevicollis Fieber 1858, A. concolor Jakovlev 1877, A. crassicornis Wagner 1964, A. jani Fieber 1858, A. montanus Wagner 1974, A. nasutus (Kirschbaum 1856), A. peitho Linnavuori 1997; toutefois, A. amoenus est considérée comme incertae sedis et A. jani comme nomen dubium. Deux espèces sont transférées dans le genre Megalocoleus Reuter: Megalocoleus delicatus (Perris 1857) n. comb., Megalocoleus tarsalis (Reuter 1894) n. comb. Dix espèces sont mises en synonymie; soit avec une espèce d’Amblytylus: A. similis Wagner 1971 n. syn. de A. albidus (Hahn 1834); A. gregarius Linnavuori 1961 n. syn. de A. brevicollis Fieber 1868; A. vittiger Reuter 1899 n. syn., A. longicornis Wagner 1953 n. syn. et A. eckerleini Wagner 1964 n. syn. de A. concolor Jakovlev 1877; soit avec une espèce de Megalocoleus: A. erectus Wagner 1971 n. syn. de M. longirostris (Fieber 1861); A. glaucicollis Kerzhner 1977 n. syn. de M. exanguis (Herrich-Schaeffer 1835); A. macedonicus Wagner 1956 n. syn. de M. naso (Reuter 1879) n. comb.; A. luridus Hoberlandt 1961 n. syn. et A. scutellaris Horvath 1905 n. syn. de M. delicatus (Perris 1857) n. comb. Un lectotype est désigné pour quatre espèces (Lopus nasutus Kirshbaum, Amblytylus vanduzeei Blatchey, Amblytylus scutellaris Horváth, Capsus delicatus Perris). Une clé d’identification pratique bilingue (français et anglais) basée surtout sur des caractères externes tente de séparer les espèces d’Amblytylus. Une clé révisée des espèces de Megalocoleus est également fournie. Les deux genres Amblytylus et Megalocoleus, très semblables par l’habitus, restent difficiles à définir. Seules les plantes-hôtes - des Poaceae chez les Amblytylus, des Asteraceae chez les Megalocoleus - et dans une moindre mesure la vesica pourvue de deux processus apicaux (Amblytylus) ou d’un seul (Megalocoleus) semble indiquer l’existence de deux groupes d’espèces distincts.
Article
Full-text available
The roof (dorsal wall) of the female genital chamber (bursa copulatrix) was compared in 31 species representing six subgenera of the taxonomically difficult genus Psallus Fieber, 1858. This investigation tested the potential value of different elements of the dorsal wall (dorsal sac, sclerotized rings, spermathecal gland, lateral oviducts, and infolding of the lateral margins), anticipating diagnostic characters and phylogenetic information for a genus in need of revision. The dorsal sac, a very variable membranous pouch differentiated from the vaginal wall, appears highly informative in providing reliable diagnostic characters at species level; to some extent it may also reveal related species. At subgenus or genus level, the dorsal sac must be examined with other equally informative structures of the roof. In some cases, strong evidence is provided by these structures aiding the recognition of related and unrelated species. The subgenus Pityopsallus Wagner forms a homogenous species-group which does not seems closely related to Psallus s.l. and should be raised to generic status as already proposed by several authors. The subgenus Hylopsallus Wagner appears to gather several species united by at least one synapomorphy after removing unrelated species such as P. (Hylopsallus) callunae Reuter. Also, it is clear that Psallus pardalis Seidenstücker and Psallus jungaricus Vinokurov &Luo should be excluded from Psallus. One or several characters in the roof of some phyline species (Atractotomus Fieber, Campylomma Reuter, Europiella Reuter, Phoenicocoris Reuter, Plagiognathus Fieber, Phylus Hahn, Sthenarus Fieber) appear to be distinct from those of Psallus species.
Article
Full-text available
In Miridae, the roof (dorsal wall) of the female genital chamber (bursa copulatrix) is often neglected in taxonomic studies, rarely represented in its entirety and its importance is usually underestimated. It contains several organs that are relevant for taxonomy and phylogeny, namely the ringed glands (parieto-vaginal glands) encircled by the widely used sclerotized rings, the spermathecal gland (vermiform gland), and the lateral oviducts; it may also display various “dorsal sacs” or pouches and other poorly known structures. The comparison of 24 species belonging to seven mirid subfamilies, and various additional literature data, suggest that the general architecture of the roof and the topographic relations of its different organs may be used to ascertain relationships of higher taxa. Information is mainly provided on the “dorsal sac”, i.e. a very variable pouch-like structure usually medially located in the vicinity of the lateral oviducts and the spermathecal gland. The dorsal sac is derived from the roof of the genital chamber, i.e. is a differentiation of the vaginal wall, and cannot be derived from the common oviduct as claimed by several authors. Apparently, the common oviduct does not exist in Miridae. A dorsal sac, variously shaped, occurs within most subfamilies examined (Cylapinae, Orthotylinae, Phylinae, Bryocorinae, Deraeocorinae, Mirinae). Some representatives of the tribe Mirini and Stenodemini (Mirinae) exhibit two types of dorsal sac. The subfamily Isometopinae as well as some species in each of the other subfamilies examined seem to be devoid of dorsal sac. Apparently, dorsal sacs are adaptive pouches which receive and lodge some parts of the phallus during copulation. At species level, the dorsal sac is informative in providing diagnostic characters. At supraspecific levels (genus, tribe, subfamily) the dorsal sac must be examined jointly with other equally informative structures of the roof: architecture of the sclerotized rings; location of the spermathecal gland; location, length and aspect of the lateral oviducts; aspect and size of the infoldings of the lateral margins of the genital chamber (mainly in Phylinae and Orthotylinae); shape of the genital chamber in dorsal view; and the presence, aspect and size of the paired lateral apodemes of the genital chamber.
Article
Full-text available
The twenty-two species currently placed in the Palaearctic genus Amblytylus Fieber are revised. The genus is redefined principally with reference to characters of the male genitalia. Ten species are retained in this genus: A. albidus (Hahn 1834), A. amoenus Wagner 1958, A. arnoldiorum Kerzhner 1977, A. brevicollis Fieber 1858, A. concolor Jakovlev 1877, A. crassicornis Wagner 1964, A. jani Fieber 1858, A. montanus Wagner 1974, A. nasutus (Kirschbaum 1856), and A. peitho Linnavuori 1997. In this revision, however, we regard A. amoenus as incertae sedis and A. jani as a nomen dubium. Two species are transferred to the genus Megalocoleus Reuter: Megalocoleus delicatus (Perris 1857) n. comb., Megalocoleus tarsalis (Reuter 1894) n. comb. Ten species are placed in synonymy; either with species of Amblytylus: A. similis Wagner 1971 n. syn. of A. albidus (Hahn 1834); A. gregarius Linnavuori 1961 n. syn. of A. brevicollis Fieber 1868; A. vittiger Reuter 1899 n. syn., A. longicornis Wagner 1953 n. syn., A. eckerleini Wagner 1964 n. syn. of A. concolor Jakovlev 1877; or with a species of Megalocoleus: A. erectus Wagner 1971 n. syn. of M. longirostris (Fieber 1861); A. glaucicollis Kerzhner 1977 n. syn. of M. exanguis (Herrich-Schaeffer 1835); A. macedonicus Wagner 1956 n. syn. of M. naso (Reuter 1879) n. comb.; A. luridus Hoberlandt 1961 n. syn. and A. scutellaris Horváth 1905 n. syn. of M. delicatus (Perris 1857) n. comb. Lectotypes are designated for four species (Lopus nasutus Kirshbaum, Amblytylus vanduzeei Blatchey, Amblytylus scutellaris Horváth, Capsus delicatus Perris 1857). A bilingual (French and English) identification key to the species of Amblytylus, based mainly on external characters, is presented. A revised key to the species of Megalocoleus is also given. The two genera Amblytylus and Megalocoleus are very similar in general appearance and remain difficult to define. The existence of two distinct groups of species seems to be indicated only by their host plants (the Poaceae in the case of Amblytylus, and Asteraceae in the case of Megalocoleus), and to a lesser extent by the vesica, with either two apical processes (Amblytylus) or only one (Megalocoleus).
Article
Full-text available
Les vingt-quatre espèces actuellement attribuées au genre Megalocoleus sont réexaminées après étude de tous les types disponibles. Les genitalia mâles et femelles apportent des caractères discriminants beaucoup plus fiables que les caractères externes et sont souvent indispensables pour séparer les espèces. Quelques caractères externes se révèlent néanmoins utiles mais ces derniers sont particulièrement difficiles à apprécier sur les spécimens qui ne sont pas en parfait état. Au terme de cette revue, il apparaît que le genre ne pourra être correctement défini qu’après étude de toutes les espèces décrites dans le genre voisin Amblytylus. Les modifications suivantes peuvent être néanmoins proposées dès à présent:– Réhabilitation d’une espèce, Megalocoleus krueperi (Reuter, 1879) bona species; en conséquence, M. satrapes Horváth, 1907 et M. binotatus (Wagner, 1953), auparavant synonymes de M. lunula, deviennent synonymes de M. krueperi (Reuter, 1879). – Mise en synonymie de 8 espèces: M. hungaricus Wagner, 1944 n. syn. de M. naso (Reuter, 1879); M. ocrensis Wagner, 1972 n. syn. de M. exsanguis (Herrich-Schaeffer, 1835); M. bifidus Wagner, 1973 n. syn. et M. fasciatus Wagner, 1969 n. syn. de M. lunula (Fieber, 1861); M. hirsutus Drapolyuk, 1991 n. syn. de M. signoreti (Reuter, 1879); M. confusus Wagner, 1958 n. syn. et M. pericarti Linnavuori, 1970 n. syn. de M. molliculus (Fallén, 1807). – Exclusion du genre Megalocoleus de quatre espèces; trois sont mises en synonymie: M. femoralis (Reuter, 1879), n. syn. de Tinicephalus hortulanus (Meyer-Dür, 1843), M. fumanae Wagner, 1974 n. syn. de Tinicephalus croceus Wagner 1969, M. servadeii Wagner, 1954 n. syn. d’Amblytylus tarsalis Reuter, 1894; une espèce, M. atricornis devient Tinicephalus atricornis (Wagner, 1965) n. comb. Une clé d’identification pratique (en français et en anglais), basée sur des caractères externes, tente de séparer les 14 espèces de Megalocoleus que le genre compte après cette étude.
Article
The 24 species assigned to the genus Megalocoleus are re-examined after study of all available types. The male and female genitalia provide much more reliable diagnostic characters than do external characters and are often essential for distinguishing species. Nevertheless some external characters are useful but particularly difficult to apply to specimens not in perfect condition. At the time of this review, it seems that the genus cannot be properly defined without study of the species in the closely related genus Amblytylus. The following changes can nevertheless be proposed at present : - Restoration of one species, Megalocoleus krueperi (Reuter, 1879) bona species ; consequently M. satrapes Horváth, 1907 and M. binotatus (Wagner, 1953), previously synonyms of M. lunula, must be synonyms of M. krueperi Reuter, 1879. - Placing eight species into synonymy : M. hungaricus Wagner, 1944 n. syn. of M. naso (Reuter, 1879) ; M. ocrensis Wagner, 1972 n. syn. of M. exsanguis (Herrich-Schaeffer, 1835) ; M. bifidus Wagner, 1973 n. syn. and M. fascia tus Wagner, 1969 n. syn. of M. lunula (Fieber, 1861) ; M. hirsutus Drapolyuk, 1991 n. syn. of M. signoreti (Reuter, 1879) ; M. confusus Wagner, 1958 n. syn. and M. pericarti Linnavuori, 1970 n. syn. of M. molliculus (Fallén, 1807). - Exclusion from the genus Megalocoleus of four species ; three species are new synonyms : M. femoralis (Reuter, 1879) n. syn. de Tinicephalus hortulanus (Meyer-Dür, 1843), M. fumanae Wagner, 1974 n. syn. of Tinicephalus croceus Wagner 1969 ; M. servadeii Wagner, 1954 n. syn. of Amblytylus tarsalis Reuter, 1894 ; one species, M. atricornis becomes Tinicephalus atricornis (Wagner, 1965) n. comb. A practical key (in French and in English) for identification, based on external characters, offers separation of the 14 species of Megalocoleus forming the genus after the present study.
Catalogue of the Heteroptera of the Palaearctic Region
  • M Kerzhner I
  • Josifov M
KERZHNER I. M. & JOSIFOV M. 1999: Miridae Hahn, 1933. Pp. 1-577. In: AUKEMA B. & RIEGER Ch. (eds): Catalogue of the Heteroptera of the Palaearctic Region. Volume 3. Cimicomorpha II. The Netherlands Entomological Society, Amsterdam, xiv + 577 pp.