Article

"In the war front we never think that we are women": Women, gender, and the Liberation Tamil Tigers of Eelam

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the author.

Abstract

Since Sri Lankan independence in 1948, conflict between the majority Sinhalese and the minority Tamil population has been largely continuous, leading to armed struggle from the 1970s on and civil war from 1983 on, with manyTamils desiring the establishment of an independent Tamil state or some form of federal or autonomous region political structure. While there are many distinct dimensions of this ethnic/nationalist conflict, this chapter focuses on the kinds of roles considered appropriate held by the major separatist group the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) for women in nationalist struggles and in society more generally. The LTTE included women in their military and political struggles, a very unusual practice at the time that remains a standout in nationalist struggles. Despite the 2009 defeat of the LTTE and the apparent end of the Sri Lankan civil war, LTTE ideas about women and gender have been influential in Sri Lankan Tamil society for decades and arguably remain so.This chapter, then, looks at women and gender in the LTTE militant movement. © 2011 by the University of Georgia Press. All rights reserved.

No full-text available

Request Full-text Paper PDF

To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the author.

... Although the participation of women in the FARC-EP, particularly at command level, falls short of the experience of other insurgent groups (Alison, 2003(Alison, , 2011Boutron, 2013Boutron, , 2015Knapp et al., 2016;Szekely, 2020;White, 2015), it was still very significant. Among guerrilla ranks, 33% of combatants were women (UNAL, 2017). 1 Although some accounts mention women constituted 40% of mid-level commanders (Gibbs, 2010), they were probably less. ...
Article
Full-text available
Academic perspectives on women in conflict have been consistently moving away from the reductionist narrative of victimhood or deviation from gender norms. Yet, this narrative is still predominant in humanitarian discourses, while it is assumed that women's participation in peacebuilding derives from their natural proclivities. These narratives, we argue, reinforce the gendered patriarchal post-conflict order as ex-combatant women are pushed into traditional roles through reintegration processes without addressing gendered structural and systemic violence. This article is based on the Colombian case, where a peace agreement in 2016 marked the official end to decades of conflict between FARC-EP rebels and the government. While deep changes were promised, the reality for women ex-combatants has been-despite unprecedented levels of women's participation-a reordering into traditional roles and a reinforcement of conjugal order rather than a transformative progression towards peacetime emancipation. We argue that, while the government claimed that the economic and political systems were non-negotiable red-lines, there was also another unspoken red-line: that of gender roles. This article argues that addressing the gendered structural roots of conflicts in order to build sustainable peace requires a decisive participation of women, including former rebel combatants whose potential contribution to transformative peacebuilding are often ignored.
... Women militants in the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) in Sri Lanka formed the all-female unit-"The Birds of Freedom"-fought in the frontlines, underwent rigorous military training and featured prominently in the LTTE's suicide bombing squad, "The Black Tigers" (Alison 2011, 134: Bloom 2005. LTTE combatants, both men and women, were popularly known as "tigers", an association perhaps made on the basis of the organization's reference to the tiger as its symbol. ...
Article
Full-text available
In the war front we never think that we are women and we are soft by nature. These disappear from our minds. In the war front we have only our aim in our mind, our aim to get an independent nation (in Alison 2011, 141). The above words from a Sri Lankan woman combatant in the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), Miranda Alison points out, illustrate how equality between men and women in the militant organization was understood in relation to women adopting a more " masculine " role (2011, 141). Alison's position echoes feminist engagements with LTTE women combatants that have maintained that women's assimilation into the militant Tamil organization involved a process of either " abandoning " or " suspending " their femininity (Coomaraswamy 1996, 9; Eager 2008, 138). As women militants were required to cut their hair short or pin it up, dress in " manly " military fatigues instead of the traditional colourful dresses which were markers of normative Tamil femininity (Coomaraswamy 1996, 9), they were also given intense military training similar to the male cadres, and expected to perform equally with men in the battle fronts, as well as execute suicide attacks. Indeed feminist analyses which explore women's involvement in political conflicts in Sri Lanka and elsewhere make significant observations and contribute to interventions in how women in violence are perceived. My focus in this paper, while acknowledging the importance of such contributions, seeks to engage with women's bodily experiences of becoming militant. I contend that we need to ask, particularly in the case of the LTTE but possibly in relation to other militant groups as well, whether becoming militant for women, is merely synonymous with adopting a more masculine or androgynous identity? What are the implications of becoming militant for women's material, bodily experiences? In this paper I explore the literary representations of LTTE's women suicide bombers and their gendered, bodily transformations, by
Article
Full-text available
Journal of Democracy 13.1 (2002) 84-98 "History," wrote Hegel, "teaches that history teaches men nothing." Despite 19 years of ethnic conflict, Sri Lanka's political, civic, and religious leaders have failed -- or refused -- to see that their actions have poisoned interethnic relations and engendered a stubborn and cruel civil war. The cancer that eats at Sri Lanka's political life is "ethnic outbidding": the auction-like process whereby Sinhalese politicians strive to outdo one another by playing on their majority community's fears and ambitions. This "outbidding" has plunged the Sinhalese government in Colombo and the Tamil rebels who control parts of the northeast into a protracted conflict. There is no peace, and democracy has been reduced to a hollow shell. Democratic forms and institutions have been preserved for appearance's sake, while the essentials of true constitutional liberalism -- the rule of law; limited government; free and fair elections; and the freedoms of assembly, speech, and religion -- have been perverted, crippled, or destroyed in an atmosphere of ethnic hatred. Under normal circumstances, universal-suffrage elections, party politics, and elite competition are crucial for democracy. In Sri Lanka, however, misguided or malicious leaders have used these democratic mainstays to perpetrate ethnic conflict and gain politically. While in formal terms Sri Lanka may be a consolidated democracy, having managed the requisite two peaceful turnovers of power more than four decades ago, the actuality is sadly different. For if we ask whether the rules governing formal democratic processes are consistently observed by all parties, we can see just how badly ethnic particularism and outbidding have dominated the country's politics since the mid-1950s and undercut democratic consolidation. Sri Lanka (called Ceylon until 1972) is slightly smaller than the Republic of Ireland but contains nearly 19 million people. British authorities granted universal suffrage in 1931; independence came in 1948 as the British withdrew from the subcontinent. In 1981, the last all-island census put the island's ethnic breakdown at 74 percent Sinhalese, 12.7 percent Sri Lankan Tamil, 5.5 percent Indian Tamil (descendants of indentured laborers who came to work on the central-highlands tea plantations under the British), and 7 percent "Moor" or Muslim. Sinhalese and Tamils are distinguished by ethnicity, language, and religion -- the former are mostly Buddhist while the latter are predominantly Hindu. In the main, the two groups coexisted peacefully for nearly two millennia. Ethnic tensions date from the 1920s, when Tamil politicians first began to fear what universal-suffrage elections might mean in a society where Sinhalese outnumbered them six to one. Yet despite Tamil misgivings, the interethnic comity between the elites from each group allowed them to work together for independence. Tragically, soon after independence was won, Sinhalese leaders began to justify Tamil fears by taking advantage of their community's overwhelming numbers, the first-past-the-post electoral system, and a unitary state structure with no substantive minority guarantees. The first step -- and here the Sinhalese had the able assitance of certain Sri Lankan Tamil politicians -- was to disenfranchise the country's Indian Tamils. This maneuver meant that the Sinhalese composed more than four-fifths of the electorate. Each Sinhalese political party began seeking victory in the island's hypercompetitive political arena by trying to take the most truculently pro-Sinhalese, anti-Tamil stance. Spurring the whole thing on was the Sinhalese swabasha (self-language) movement, which used its influence in civil society to condemn linguistic parity and successfully demand a Sinhala-only policy. As suggested above, Sri Lanka's constitutional structure lent itself to ethnic outbidding. What the island needed was a setup that encouraged consensus politics and polyethnic coexistence. What it got was the opposite. As Arend Lijphart has noted, in most deeply divided polyethnic societies, "majority rule spells majority dictatorship and civil strife rather than democracy." Consequently, "what such societies need is a democratic regime that emphasizes consensus instead of opposition, that includes rather than excludes." A structure that allows an in-group to govern with little or no input from out-groups may eventually entice "communally based political entrepreneurs [to] seek to increase the salience...
Article
This article examines how and why the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) integrated women, highlighting themes common to women's participation in militant groups such as women's unique propaganda value and cultural limits on recruiting women and employing them in political violence.