Content uploaded by Owais Wani
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Owais Wani on Feb 10, 2016
Content may be subject to copyright.
Vol. 7(3), pp. 126-129, March, 2015
DOI: 10.5897/IJBC2014.0800
Article Number: 97242D651810
ISSN 2141-243X
Copyright © 2015
Author(s) retain the copyright of this article
http://www.academicjournals.org/IJBC
International Journal of Biodiversity
and Conservation
Full Length Research Paper
A study on Ichthyofaunal diversity of Sagar lake,
Madhya Pradesh, India
Owais Ahmad Wani* and Uma Shankar Gupta
Department of Zoology, Dr. Harisingh Gour University Sagar, M.P. India.
Received 04 December, 2014; Accepted 24 February, 2015
The objective of the present study was to report the ichthyofaunal diversity of Sagar lake Madhya
Pradesh, central India. During the study, a total of 21 species of freshwater fishes belonging to 6 orders,
11 families and 17 genera were recorded from the study sites of the lake. Family Cyprinidae,
contributing about 48% of the fish diversity of the lake, was found to be the most abundant family of the
fishes. According to Conservation Assessment and Management Plan (CAMP) Conservation status
among 21 species, 2 are endangered, 5 are vulnerable, 10 are at lower risk- near threatened status, 1
lower risk least concern and 3 non evaluated. The study also shows a tremendous decrease in the
ichthyofaunal diversity of the lake during the last decade.
Key words: Fish diversity, conservation status, Sagar lake.
INTRODUCTION
Fish constitute more than a half of the total number of all
other vertebrates in the world. Out of 64,000 vertebrates,
32,900 species of fish had been described by November
2014 (Froese and Pauly, 2014). India has offered a large
variety of water bodies and habitats to aquatic life. Its
coastal marine waters, river systems, streams, different
wetlands, lakes and ponds of different water quality, at
different altitudes have favoured the development of a
species-rich fish fauna with a large variety of adaptations.
Therefore, India is today a megadiverse in fish fauna and
occupies 9th position in terms of fresh water biodiversity.
There are about 2,546 species of fishes (about 11% of
the world species) found in Indian waters. Central India
harbor a wide variety of freshwater fishes in its diverse
water resources such as streams, rivers, reservoirs, sub-
terrain aquatic ecosystems, traditional lakes and
domestic ponds. Study of fish fauna in Madhya Pradesh
started with the work of D' Abrue (1925). Later several
workers studied the fish fauna of Madhya Pradesh which
include Hora (1938, 1940), Hora and Nair (1941), Dubey
and Mehra (1959), Mathur and Mishra (1976), Karmakar
and Datta (1988), Desai (1994), Desai et al. (1997),
Sharma (2007, 2008, 2009), Thilak (2009, 2011), Vyas et
al. (2012), Dongre et al. (2012), Paunikar et al. (2012),
and Uchchariya et al. (2012). The suggestions for fish
conservation are sure to come out only after the depth
study of their biodiversity. The objective of the present
study was to document the fish fauna of Sagar lake
located almost at the centre of India.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Sagar lake is situated in the heart of Sagar city (23°50'N 78°45'E
517m) with an area of 82 hectares (Figure 1). The entire lake can
be divided into two parts; the main lake occupying an area 68
*Corresponding author. E-mail: owaiswm@gmail.com.
Author(s) agree that this article remain permanently open access under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
International License
Wani and Gupta 127
Figure 1. Sattelite image of Sagar lake showing three sampling stations. A: chakra ghat area, B: Sanjay
drive area, C: Fisheries department area.
hectares and a small wetland of 14 hectares.
The present study was carried out from March 2012 to April
2014. The fish were collected monthly from three sampling sites of
the lake (Sanjay drive area, Chakraghat area and Fishery department
area) as shown in Figure 1, with the help of local fishermen using
cast nets during days and gill nets installed over nights applying the
fish collection methods of Arunachalam (2000). The fish samples
were then preserved in 4% formalin and brought to laboratory for
identification. Systematic identification of the fish species were
carried out by using the standard keys of Talwar and Jhingran
(1991) and Jayaram (1999). Threat status of each fish was made
according to the report on Conservation Assessment and
Management Plan (CAMP) for freshwater fishes of India (Molur and
Walker, 1998) and Red List of Threatened Species by (IUCN,
2014). The relative abundance of the fish was classified into three
categories: Abundant (+++) constitute 71-100% of total catch,
Moderate (++) constitute 36-70% of the total catch and Rare (+)
constitute 1-35% of the total catch, assuming the fishing efforts
constant for each catch.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
During the two years of an extensive study, a total of 21
species of freshwater fishes belonging to 6 orders, 11
families and 17 genera were recorded from the study
sites of the lake. The species found in the lake, their
taxonomic distribution, threat status and relative
abundance is given in Table 1. The most abundant family
of the fishes, Cyprinidae was represented by 10 species
contributing about 48% of the fish diversity in the lake.
The percent contribution of other families is shown in
Figure 2. According to CAMP report, among 21 species,
2 are endangered, 5 are vulnerable, 10 are at lower risk-
near threatened status and according to IUCN 2014
report 3 species are near threatened, 16 are at least
concern and 2 are not evaluated.
The previous studies on fish diversity of Sagar lake
have mentioned 41 species belonging to 25 genera and
13 different families (Tiwari, 2006). The present data
when compared with the earlier data on ichthyofaunal
diversity of Sagar lake recorded not more than a decade
ago shows a tremendous decrease in the ichthyofaunal
diversity of this lake. Puntius ticto, Puntius conchonius
and Puntius sophore are the most abundant species
found throughout the lake. All the species were found
equally distributed throughout the lake however P. sophore
was found in abundance in the small wet land portion of
the lake. Some species like Xenentodon cancila, Puntius
sarana, Rasbora daniconius and Mastacembelus armatus
are very rare and are about at the verge of extinction
from the lake. The fish farmers have started to cultivate
some species like Catla catla, Labeo rohita and Cirrhinus
mrigala in the lake for economical purposes.
The introduction of exotic fish Oreochromis niloticus a
decade ago was a great success as it grows widely, but it
may be one of the several causes for dwindling of fish
biodiversity of the lake. The exotic fish pose a threat to
indegenious fish species (Mukherjee et al., 2002). So,
continuous monitoring of non-indigenous species should
be done to avoid their negative impacts (Galib et al.,
2013).
The other reasons for the depletion of the fish species
are pollution and indiscriminate exploitation of fish. The
pollution of the Sagar lake is a matter of concern,
sedimentation and the spread of weeds pose serious
threat to the fish fauna of this lake. Therefore there is a
128 Int. J. Biodivers. Conserv.
Table 1. List of fish species from Sagar lake with their conservation status and abundance in the lake.
Taxonomical rank
Scientific name
Abundance
CAMP status
IUCN status
1. Order: Siluriformes
Family : Siluridae
Ompok bimaculatus
+
EN
NT
Wallago attu
+
LR-nt
NT
Family : Bagriidae
Mystus vittatus
++
VU
LC
Family : Heteropneustidae
Heteropneustes fossilis
++
VU
LC
2. Order: Osteoglossiformes
Family : Notopteridae
Notopterus notopterus
++
EN
LC
3. Order: Synbranchiformes
Family : Mastacembelidae
Mastacembelus armatus
+
VU
LC
4. Order: Cypriniformes
Family : Cyprinidae
Puntius conchonius
+++
LR-nt
LC
Puntius ticto
+++
LR-nt
LC
Puntius sarana
+
VU
LC
Puntius sophore
+++
LR-nt
LC
Catla catla
*
VU
NE
Labeo rohita
*
LR-nt
LC
Cirrhinus mrigala
*
LR-nt
NE
Rasbora rasbora
+++
LR-nt
LC
Rasbora daniconius
+
LR-nt
LC
Chela laubuca
++
LR-lc
LC
Family: Cobitidae
Lepidocephalichthys guntea
+++
NE
LC
5. Order: Beloniformes
Family : Belonidae
Xenentodon cancila
+
LR-nt
LC
6. Order: Perciformes
Family : Gobiidae
Glossogobius giuris
+++
LR-nt
LC
Family : Cichlidae
Oreochromis mossambicus
+++
NE
NT
Family : Ambassidae
Parambassis ranga
++
NE
LC
EN = Endangered; VU = Vulnerable; LR-lc = Lower risk least concern; LR-nt = Lower risk near threatened; NE = Not
evaluate; LC = Least concern; NT = Near Threatened; +++ = Abundant ++ = Moderate; + = Rare; * = cultivated in the lake.
Figure 2. Percent contribution of families towards ichthyofaunal diversity of the lake.
pressing need to give special attention for the conservation
of fish diversity of the lake.
Simmilar studies were also reported from two Lakes of
Kumaon, Uttarakhand (Negi and Rajput, 2012), Changhoz
Dam, Pakistan (Khan and Hassan 2011), Vattakkayal
lake (Seethal et al., 2013). These studies are about
exploring the ichthyofaunal diversity of different water
bodies, present their threat status, abundance and
taxonomic distribution. Such studies provide the first
hand assessment to understand and conserve the fish
diversity of their water bodies.
Conflict of interests
The authors did not declared any conflict of interests.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors are thankful to the local fishermen and
Department of Fisheries, Sagar, MP, India for their
support during the course of study.
REFERENCES
Arunachalam M (2000). Assemblage structure of stream fishes in the
Western Ghats (India). Hydrobiologia 430:1-31.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1004080829388
D' Abrue EA (1925). Zoological Survey of India, Calcutta
Desai VR (1994). Endangered, vulnerable and rare fishes of river
systems (Western and Central) of Madhya Pradesh. Threatened
fishes of India. Nature conservation Publication 4:97-108.
Desai VR, Kumar D, Shrivastava NP (1997). Fish fauna of Ravishankar
Sagar Reservoir. J. Inland Fisheries Society of India 29(2):53-56.
Dongre SD, Bhavsar C, Verma RG (2012). Fish Diversity of Tribal
District Satpura Valley, Betul of Madhya Pradesh in India. Intl.
Referred Res. J. 3:37.
Dubey GP, Mehra RK (1959). Fish and fisheries of Chambal River.
Proc. First All India Congress in Zoology 647-664.
Froese R, Pauly D (2014). Fish Base. World Wide Web electronic
publication. www.fishbase.org, version (08/2014).
Galib SM, Abu Naser SM, Mohsin ABM, Chaki N and Fahad FH (2013)
Fish diversity of the River Choto Jamuna, Bangladesh: Present status
and conservation needs. Int. J. Biodivers. Conserv. 5(6): 389-395.
Hora SL (1938). Notes on fishes in the Indian Museum. On a collection
of fish Bailadila range, Bastar State, Central Provinces, Record of
Indian Museum 40(3):237-241.
Hora SL (1940). On a collection of fish from the head waters of the
Mahanadi River, Raipur district, C.P. Record of Indian Museum 42(2):
365-375.
Wani and Gupta 129
Hora SL, Nair KK (1941). Record of Indian Museum. 43: 361-373.
IUCN (2014). IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2014.1.
<www.iucnredlist.org>, Downloaded on 19 November 2014.
Jayaram KC (1999). The Fresh Water Fishes of the Indian Region. New
Delhi, Narendra Publishing House.
Karmakar AK, Datta AK (1988). On a collection of fish from Bastar
District, Madhya Pradesh. Record of Zoological Survey of India
Occasional Paper 98:1-50.
Khan MA, Hasan Z (2011). A Preliminary survey of fish fauna of
Changhoz Dam, Karak, K.P.K. Pakistan. World J. fish marine Sci.
3(5):376-378.
Mathur DS, Mishra SK (1976). Addition to the fish fauna of Jabalpur
district (MP). Newsletter of Zoological Survey of India 2(4):156-158.
Molur S, Walker S (1998). Report of the Conservation Assessment and
Management Plan. Workshop on freshwater fishes of India, Zoo
outreach Organization/CBSG, Coimbatore, India: 156.
Mukherjee M, Praharaj A, Das S (2002). Conservation of endangered
fish stocks through artificial propagation and larval rearing technique
in West Bengal, India. Aquaculture Asia 7(2):8-11.
Negi RK, Rajput V (2012). Fish Diversity in Two Lakes of Kumaon
Himalaya Uttarakhand, India. Res. J. Biol. 2(5):157-161.
Paunikar S, Tiple A, Jadhav SS, Talmale SS (2012). Studies on
Ichthyofaunal Diversity of Gour River, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh,
Central India. World J. Fish Marine Sci. 4(4): 356-359.
Seethal LS, Jaya DS, Williams SE (2013). Biodiversity Status of Fishes
from Vattakkayal, A Part of Ashtamudi Lake, Kollam District, Kerala,
South India. Intl. J. Sci. Res. Publications 3(12).
Sharma HS (2007). Freshwater Fishes. In Fauna of Madhya Pradesh
(including Chhattisgarh), State Fauna Series 15(1):147-244.
Sharma HS (2008). Pisces Faunal diversity of Jabalpur district (M.P.).
Zoological Survey of India 225-274.
Sharma HS (2009). "Pisces" Fauna of Pachmarhi Biosphere Reserve
(MP), Conservation Area Series, zoological Survey of India 39:135-
173.
Talwar PK, Jhingran AG (1991). Inland Fishes. vol. 1 & 2, New Delhi,
Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd.
Thilak J (2009). "Pisces" Fauna of Bandavgarh Tiger Reserve,
Conservation Area Series, 40.Zool. Surv. India 147-160.
Thilak J (2011). On a collection of Fishes from Singhori Wildlife
Sanctuary, dist. Raisen, M.P. Bionotes 13(1):21-22.
Tiwari, M.K (2006). Ichthyofauna diversity in the natural water bodies of
Sagar, M.P., Ph.D theisis, Dr. H. S. Gour University Sagar, India.
Uchchariya DK, Saxena M, Saksena DN (2012). Fish biodiversity of
Tighra reservoir of Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India. J. Fisheries
Aquacult. 3(1):37-43.
Vyas V, Damde D, Parashar V (2012). Fish biodiversity of Betwa River
in Madhya Pradesh, India with special reference to a sacred ghat.
Intl. J. Biodiver. Conserv. 4(2):71-77.