ArticlePDF Available

Early Intervention in First Episode Psychosis: A Service User's Experience

Authors:
234
Schizophrenia Bulletin vol. 43 no. 2 pp. 234–235, 2017
doi:10.1093/schbul/sbv227
Advance Access publication January 12, 2016
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center.
All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com
FIRST PERSON ACCOUNT
Early Intervention in First Episode Psychosis: AService User’s Experience
StephanieAllan
Institute of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Scotland.
To whom correspondence should be addressed; tel: +44 (0)141 211-0690, e-mail: 2013906a@student.gla.ac.uk
I had my rst severe psychotic episode in early 2010. Two
years prior to this my thoughts had began slowing down.
Normally, thinking about doing an action and then mov-
ing the required body part happened simultaneously.
Now there was a gap. Iwas a radiotherapy student and
since operating X-ray machinery requires a smooth ow
of decision making and intricate movement. These slow
thoughts made me a hazard. Once Igave up my degree,
Ihad no-where to go during the day and would lie in bed.
My general practitioner thought I was depressed and
gave me antidepressants. We know now that Iwasn’t and
Ihad prodromal psychosis. Eventually the slow thoughts
took over my mind and Ibegan hearing voices that were
frightening.
My memories from the rst month of this episode are
fairly hazy. This is a common nding in those who have
schizophrenia and poor memory is probably the most
frustrating ongoing symptom. However, on this occasion
it became possibly adaptive. Iseemed to wake up one
day and be under the care of ESTEEM: a specialist early
intervention team for people ages 16–35 experiencing rst
episode psychosis in Glasgow. I spent 2 years with this
service and treatment was often intense. The success of
early intervention teams in producing better clinical out-
comes is generally well recognized but not without con-
troversy. However, there seems to be a lack of personal
accounts of what such a service is like for those who use
it. Therefore, Iwould like to share my own experience in
thisarea.
Looking back on 2010–2012 Ihave a sense of immense
gratitude. While Iwas with ESTEEM, Ihad taken all of
my treatment for granted and was unaware that the inten-
sity of the support that Iwas given was quite unusual.
My support worker would regularly take me out for a
tea to ensure that Iwas leaving the house. While Iwas
hospitalized, Iwas taken out for the day with other ser-
vice users to the bowling alley and the cinema to make
the stay less tedious. Icould text any time if Iwas strug-
gling which was powerful for someone who was paranoid
about using the phone. It was not always smooth sailing
and since Iwas paranoid it took a while to build up trust
and accept treatment. My support workers wanted to
know what Iwas like before hallucinations made me feel
threatened and act snippy. Islowly realized these ques-
tions were not asked to irritate or shame me for my low
functioning but to help me get back to where Iwanted
tobe.
From their website, ESTEEM describe themselves as
“working within a framework that believes recovery from
psychosis is possible. Clients are encouraged to engage
in a holistic, individualized, recovery-focused approach
to their care needs. This is facilitated through collabora-
tive, therapeutic interventions between the client, their
carers and the multi-professional team.” Speaking to
friends with schizophrenia who have not received early
intervention Ibelieve it is the focus on relationships that
differentiates the treatment I received from standard
care. My family ties were in complete disarray because of
my psychosis. I had distanced myself so much from the
group that no one noticed that Iwas in hospital for well
over a week despite living nearby. Iquite liked it that way.
Upon nding out that Iwas unwell my family were at the
hospital within 1 hour and keen to get involved with my
care. Once ESTEEM realized that Ihad no reason other
than psychosis for shunning my family we were offered
therapy sessions together.
The sessions were once a week and in the evenings so
that my mother could attend around work. My psychia-
trist and support worker delivered all of the therapy.
With retrospect Ican understand myself to be lucky
that Behavioral Family Therapy (BFT) was delivered by
those who knew me best. Iwas already seeing my sup-
port worker a couple of times a week and the psychia-
trist at least once a month so we had already established
trust. Indeed, I felt that I could rely on them being
impartial should the sessions get heated. The Meriden
Family Programme website describes BFT as “essential
in all families where a member experiences serious men-
tal health difculties” due to the potential for relation-
ship dysfunction. We met for around 9 sessions which
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/schizophreniabulletin/article-abstract/43/2/234/2503380 by guest on 28 February 2019
235
Early Intervention in First Episode Psychosis
mostly focused on the development of effective com-
munication skills, educating my mum on psychosis and
developing a “staying well” plan for myself so that my
family could tell if I was becoming unwell again. The
sessions were never overly formal and my psychiatrist
often made everyone a cup of tea to drink during them.
Despite my initial cynicism the benets of better com-
munication soon became apparent and Ibegan to enjoy
being around my family again and felt attached to them
once more.
Once family relationships improved I was given indi-
vidual sessions with a clinical psychologist to improve my
relationship with myself. Iwas ashamed at having devel-
oped psychosis and having delusions that stopped me
from using certain public transport. Iwas given a mixture
of cognitive behavioural therapy and “third wave” thera-
pies such as mindfulness in addition to being allowed to
vent! My resilience increased throughout the sessions and
by the time they nished Ihad a better opinion of myself
and was able to understand that psychosis was an illness
that could be treated and not some kind of supernatural
punishment. In addition to medication and supportive
therapies I was also given practical support in access-
ing sickness benets. Eventually, as discharge from my
2years of treatment drew close Iwas asked the big ques-
tions. What did Iwant to do now? Icould not go back to
my radiotherapy degree due to the medication Iwas on.
My support worker was very encouraging in my decision
to apply to study psychology inspired by my new experi-
ences. Ihope to work within psychosis research with a
special interest in applying community psychology meth-
odologies and utilizing my experiences. I am currently
being kindly supported in achieving this goal by support-
ive academics at my university.
I am now doing well in a way that is meaningful to
me. Iwork, study and have recently gotten engaged to
someone Imet during recovery. I still take medication
every day but Ihope to not have to do this forever. Five
years ago Iwanted to die and never left the house. This
is quite a turnaround and Iam grateful to early inter-
vention for aiding in my recovery. What about other
users of ESTEEM in Glasgow? Iwould like to share
the following quote from a Scottish Government report
regarding psychiatric hospital stays for rst episode psy-
chosis across all Scottish Health Boards. “There is clear
evidence that the prevalence of psychosis has a positive
correlation with levels of deprivation. Therefore, the
fact that NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde has the low-
est number of bed days used and the shortest average
length of stay is of particular interest. Glasgow has a
specialist team for rst onset psychosis in place which
covers individuals from 16 to 35. This aligns with the
evidence base that such services result in a reduced use
of inpatient beds over the medium to longer time.”
While it is (of course) crucial to never overstate the
importance of research ndings, Ibelieve that my own
hospital stays were kept short due to the extraordi-
nary support Iwas given and early intervention has the
potential to shorten the distress felt by those who expe-
rience psychosis.
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/schizophreniabulletin/article-abstract/43/2/234/2503380 by guest on 28 February 2019
... In recent years, different types of video games, including computer games [16,17], mobile games [18], serious games [19][20][21][22][23], and virtual reality [24][25][26], have been created as adjunctive treatments for various illnesses and they have resulted in desirable outcomes. Scholars suggest that video gaming is a novel intervention for social reconstruction and skills training in people with mental illness [16,19,21,27]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Information technology and video gaming have potential advantages in the treatment of schizophrenia. However, the amount of information regarding the habits and attitudes related to internet use and video gaming among the population has been limited. Objective: This study aims to explore the habits and attitudes regarding video gaming and information technology, and their associated factors, among people with schizophrenia in Hong Kong. Methods: In this cross-sectional survey, service users with schizophrenia were recruited from six halfway hostels and seven integrated centers for mental wellness in Hong Kong. A 79-item self-report questionnaire was utilized to explore the habits on internet use and video gaming. The attitudes towards video gaming was assessed by the Gaming Attitudes, Motivations, and Experiences Scales (GAMES). A total of 110 participants were recruited using a convenience sample (a response rate of 74%). The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, an independent t-test, Pearson correlation, and principal analysis with three methods of rotations (varimax, equamax and promax). Results: Most participants (90.9%) had access to the internet and half of them (49.1%) used the internet daily, mostly to watch videos (60.0%) or read news or books, etc. (38.2%). One-third (32.7%) used the internet to play online games, and most of them (80.0%) had played a video game within the past year. The most favorable gaming platforms were cellular phones (47.7%) followed by computers (21.6%) and arcade cabinets (6.8%). The most favorable game genre was action games (23.4%). Those who had a bachelor's degree or higher, when compared to those with a lower education level, scored lower in social interaction, P = .03. Those who played video games daily scored higher in the category of Story than those who played less than daily, t(86) = 2.03, P = .05). The most popular gaming category was autonomy and the least popular categories were Violent Catharsis and Violent Reward. Two motives, "social playing" and "evasive playing," were formed to describe the characteristics of video game playing. Conclusions: In our data, there was a high internet utilization rate among people with schizophrenia in Hong Kong. Only a few of them had used the internet to search for health-related information. Our study also exemplified the unique habits of gaming among the participants. Healthcare professionals might utilize video games to engage and promote coping with stress and to provide social skills training. The identification of gaming attitudes can contribute to the development of serious games for the population. Further investigation is vital for the promotion of mental health through online platforms. Clinicaltrial:
... The extant qualitative research on the experiences of service users prior to entering treatment is promising but sparse. Previous qualitative studies and first-person accounts of first episode psychosis have indicated that fear of stigma, lack of knowledge about services and symptom normalization are barriers to treatment seeking (Allan, 2017;Cabassa et al., 2018;Ferrari et al., 2015;Jansen, Pedersen, Hastrup, Haahr, & Simonsen, 2015a;Jansen, Wøldike, Haahr, & Simonsen, 2015b;Tanskanen et al., 2011). Schalkwyk, Davidson, and Srihari (2015) found that FEP service users experienced a disconnect between their everyday concerns and initial treatment. ...
Article
Mounting evidence has indicated that early intervention leads to improved clinical and functional outcomes for young persons experiencing recent onset psychosis. As part of a large early detection campaign, the present study aimed to investigate subjective experiences during the duration of untreated psychosis (DUP), or time between psychosis onset and treatment contact. Participants were 10 young adults participating in early intervention services for psychosis. After DUP was estimated during standardized baseline assessment, participants engaged in qualitative interviews focused on their life experiences prior to treatment and leading up to the present. Mixed methods data analyses compared standardized DUP estimates with participants’ subjective narratives. Findings revealed that participants experienced and conceptualized a longer trajectory of subjective difficulties (TSD) beginning before and extending beyond standardized DUP estimates. Participants emphasized striving for independence and social belonging. The majority of participants reported benefiting from their current services and believed that earlier support of some kind would have been beneficial. These findings support previous research on subjective barriers to early detection and treatment seeking in young adults experiencing psychosis. Implications and future research directions include further efforts to differentiate the struggles unique to early psychosis from psychosocial risk factors and other challenges of young adulthood.
... Rather, we should be open to exploring new territory both theoretically and methodologically, allowing individuals to take us onto their home turf rather than insisting they always meet us on ours. Creative methodologies like photoelicitation [119], artistic and musical expression [120,121], and participant-observation out in the community [16]-not to mention engaging service-users in articulating, researching, interpreting, and analyzing the many meanings of recovery [63,[122][123][124][125]-are necessary if we truly want to learn what recovery looks like. New methodologies and new interlocutors may demonstrate that recovery looks not at all like what clinic-based research has led us to believe. ...
Article
Full-text available
Growing research has highlighted that the first few years of psychotic illnesses constitute a “critical period” in which (i) the majority of the functional deterioration that accompanies these illnesses occurs, and (ii) individuals are most responsive to both pharmacological and psychosocial treatments for psychosis and its deleterious sequelae. Clinical interest in intervening earlier in psychotic episodes, and what early intervention might mean for a person’s symptom reduction and social functioning, has emerged within a decades-long history of social science research on the concept of recovery. In this article, we describe the intersection between that longstanding interest in recovery and more recent attention to first-episode psychosis to explore conundrums that may arise as clinicians engage with their clients following a first episode of psychosis. We suggest ways of addressing these situations by highlighting several complementary or alternative approaches to traditional psychiatric treatment and conclude with a call to rethink ways of doing research on recovery in first-episode psychosis.
Article
Full-text available
Psychosis is the most ineffable experience of mental disorder. We provide here the first co‐written bottom‐up review of the lived experience of psychosis, whereby experts by experience primarily selected the subjective themes, that were subsequently enriched by phenomenologically‐informed perspectives. First‐person accounts within and outside the medical field were screened and discussed in collaborative workshops involving numerous individuals with lived experience of psychosis as well as family members and carers, representing a global network of organizations. The material was complemented by semantic analyses and shared across all collaborators in a cloud‐based system. The early phases of psychosis (i.e., premorbid and prodromal stages) were found to be characterized by core existential themes including loss of common sense, perplexity and lack of immersion in the world with compromised vital contact with reality, heightened salience and a feeling that something important is about to happen, perturbation of the sense of self, and need to hide the tumultuous inner experiences. The first episode stage was found to be denoted by some transitory relief associated with the onset of delusions, intense self‐referentiality and permeated self‐world boundaries, tumultuous internal noise, and dissolution of the sense of self with social withdrawal. Core lived experiences of the later stages (i.e., relapsing and chronic) involved grieving personal losses, feeling split, and struggling to accept the constant inner chaos, the new self, the diagnosis and an uncertain future. The experience of receiving psychiatric treatments, such as inpatient and outpatient care, social interventions, psychological treatments and medications, included both positive and negative aspects, and was determined by the hope of achieving recovery, understood as an enduring journey of reconstructing the sense of personhood and re‐establishing the lost bonds with others towards meaningful goals. These findings can inform clinical practice, research and education. Psychosis is one of the most painful and upsetting existential experiences, so dizzyingly alien to our usual patterns of life and so unspeakably enigmatic and human.
Article
L’auteur décrit la réflexion du groupe pluridisciplinaire sur l’alliance thérapeutique entre équipes soignantes et familles lors d’une première hospitalisation pour un épisode psychotique. Cette alliance thérapeutique émerge et se développe dans le cadre du « système thérapeutique » constitué par la rencontre de deux groupes : le groupe famille et le groupe « équipe thérapeutique » regroupés autour de cette situation singulière et chargée émotionnellement d’une décompensation psychotique et de l’hospitalisation d’un(e) jeune. Dans cette optique, il s’agit donc de passer de la logique individuelle propre à la médecine pour passer à une logique groupale, d’une lecture purement médicale à une lecture plu- riaxiale. Alors, savoir médical et savoir profane de la famille peuvent s’énoncer et s’articuler au lieu de s’opposer. Enfin dans ce processus, la temporalité, les étapes et l’interactivité permet de gérer la part d’incertitude diagnostic et pronostic qui caractérise ces situations. Ce travail d’alliance permet d’éviter les ruptures de soins et optimise les capacités thérapeutiques des équipes et préserve l’avenir.
Book
Despite years of research, debate and changes in mental health policy, there is still a lack of consensus as to what recovery from psychosis actually means, how it should be measured and how it may ultimately be achieved. In Recovering from a First Episode of Psychosis: An Integrated Approach to Early Intervention, it is argued that recovery from a first episode of psychosis (FEP) is comprised of three core elements: symptomatic, social and personal. Moreover, all three types of recovery need to be the target of early intervention for psychosis programmes (EIP) which provide evidence-based, integrated, bio-psychosocial interventions delivered in the context of a value base offering hope, empowerment and a youth-focused approach. Over the 12 chapters in the book, the authors, all experienced clinicians and researchers from multi-professional backgrounds, demonstrate that long-term recovery needs to replace short term remission as the key target of early psychosis services and that, to achieve this, we need a change in the way we deliver EIP: one that takes account of the different stages of psychosis and the ‘bespoke’ targeting of integrated medical, psychological and social treatments during the ‘critical period’. Illustrated with a wealth of clinical examples, this book will be of great interest to clinical psychologists, psychiatrists, psychiatric nurses and other associated mental health professionals. © 2019 Chris Jackson, Eleanor Baggott, Mark Bernard, Ruth Clutterbuck, Diane Ryles and Erin Turner.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.