A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from European Journal of Wildlife Research
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Complementary use of density estimates and hunting statistics:
different sides of the same story?
Eeva M. Soininen
1
&Eva Fuglei
2
&Åshild Ø. Pedersen
2
Received: 29 September 2015 /Revised: 17 December 2015 /Accepted: 3 January 2016 /Published online: 13 January 2016
#Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Abstract The use of hunting statistics for population moni-
toring has often been criticized because such data are affected
by several sources of error. Still, for many harvested popula-
tions, hunting statistics are the only available data source and
cautious use of such data may be valuable for management.
Here we assessed to what extent long-term monitoring of
Svalbard rock ptarmigan spring densities and hunting statis-
tics (bag size and proportion of juveniles in the hunting bag)
reflect similar population fluctuations. We found a decreasing
trend in both bag size and proportion of juveniles in the bag,
but no trend in ptarmigan spring densities. However, annual
fluctuations of ptarmigan spring density and bag size were
correlated. Together, these time series indicate that both pop-
ulation abundance (bag size) and recruitment (proportion of
juveniles inthe bag) are decreasing, but the reproductive com-
ponent fraction (density of territorial males) is not yet com-
promised. This biological interpretation remains, however,
uncertain due to lack of hunting effort data. Monitoring pro-
grams using hunting statistics should therefore critically dis-
cuss and evaluate what the hunting statistics reflect and fine-
tune the hunter data collection to obtain maximum biological
relevance. Still, our results illustrate that the combination of
population estimates and hunting statistics can provide more
nuanced information about the population status than the den-
sity estimates alone.
Keywords Harvest .Lagopus muta .Long-term monitoring .
Point transect sampling .Time series
Introduction
Accurate estimation of population abundance is fundamental
to identify population fluctuation and changes, for manage-
ment and science alike. However, high-quality estimates of
population density (i.e., mark–recapture methods) are time-
consuming and expensive to achieve (Thompson et al.
1998), especially for spatial scales representative for large
hunting management units. Therefore, monitoring of harvest-
ed populations is commonly based on relative abundance in-
dices, i.e., index counts and hunting statistics (Cattadori et al.
2003; Lehikoinen et al. 2014; Pettorelli et al. 2007). Such
indices often include a substantial amount of uncertainty, as
they do not routinely account for imperfect and variable de-
tection (Pettorelli et al. 2007;Rosenstocketal.2002). Even
though many index count methods could easily incorporate
estimates of detection distance in the field protocols, and thus
achieve absolute population density estimates using the dis-
tance sampling framework, this is rarely done (Buckland et al.
2001;Matsuokaetal.2014;Rosenstocketal.2002). Hunting
statistics, on the other hand, are affected by both variable
detection probabilities and variable sampling effort and are
often interpreted without considering the effects of these
sources of error (Imperio et al. 2010;Ristetal.2008). There-
fore, hunting statistics are criticized for not giving meaningful
estimates of population abundance trends (Ranta et al. 2008;
Imperio et al. 2010; Willebrand et al. 2011, but see Cattadori
et al. 2003).
Grouse represent an important ecosystem service in terms
of recreational and subsistence harvest in many countries
(Storch 2007b). Until recently, the population trends of
*Eeva M. Soininen
eeva.soininen@uit.no
1
UiT The Arctic University of Norway, 9037 Tromsø, Norway
2
Norwegian Polar Institute, Fram Centre, 9296 Tromsø, Norway
Eur J Wildl Res (2016) 62:151–160
DOI 10.1007/s10344-016-0987-z
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.