ArticlePDF Available

The effect of humour on learning in an educational setting

Authors:

Abstract

Humour is seen to have largely positive effects on learning, but these effects are not left uncontested. Furthermore, the fact that humour is culture specific can limit the generalizability of studies. The current paper, thus, attempts to determine if humour can have an important role in the cultural context of India. The current study investigated the effect of humour on learning in a real-world educational setting. 56 participants from the 8th grade of the same high school were enlisted for the study, and divided into two groups in a classroom setting- one group receiving humorous material and the other group receiving non-humorous material. All content was displayed via slideshows spanning 5 subtopics of the school subject of ‘English’. All content was equated in terms of visual imagery and amount of information displayed. An intervening task of solving math problems was introduced between viewing the content and answering the post-test. Results were obtained using a pre-post design. Data was analysed via 2 sample independent t-tests and bivariate correlations. Results showed that the material presented in a humorous manner is remembered better than other equivalent visual non- humorous material. Secondly, exposure to humorous material is also correlated with better engagement with the material, and positive affect. These results draw attention to the need for further, culture-specific research investigations in the field of humour, as it can prove to be a very effective learning tool.
The Effect of Humour on Learning in an Educational Setting
[1]
Tanvi Sambrani
[2]
Sneha Mani
[3]
Prof. Maureen Almeida
[4]
Ewgeni Jakubovski, MA
[1] St. Xavier’s College, Autonomous, Mumbai., E-mail: tsambrani@gmail.com
[2] University of York, E-mail: snehamani@gmail.com
[3] St. Xavier’s College, Autonomous, Mumbai, E-mail: maureenalmeida@gmail.com
[4] Yale University, E-mail: ewgeni.jakubovski@yale.edu
International Journal of Education and Psychological Research (IJEPR) Volume 3, Issue 3, September 2014
52
I. INTRODUCTION
According to Chiasson (2002), humour is as human and as
authentic as the need to communicate [1]. The many positive
effects of humour - which is essentially a form of social play -
on individuals are widely known. These advantageous
functions can be broadly categorised into psychological,
physiological and social benefits. For instance, the use of
humour is known to reduce pain as humorous material
induces laughter, which in turn results in the release of
endorphins [2]. It is also known to improve blood circulation
and respiration [3]. As cited in Berk (2001), the psychological
benefits of humour include anxiety reduction, tension
reduction and stress reduction, as laughter causes a decrease
in stress hormones like serum cortisol, DOPAC (a metabolite
of dopamine) and epinephrine (Berk et al. 1988; Berk, Tan,
Fry et al. 1989; Berk, Tan, Napier. and Eby 1989; Fry 1971,
1984, 1992)[4].
Due to its numerous benefits, research on humour has been
varied. The effect of humour on learning and memory has
been of specific interest to psychologists.
Humorous content was found to have better results than non-
humorous content in a learning paradigm. Schmidt (1994)
found that humorous sentences were recalled better than non-
humorous sentences in lists containing both sentence types.
In a later study, the same group found a similar effect of
humour in cartoons (as cited in Schmidt, 2001) [5].
Subjects had a greater memory of humorous cartoons when
compared to weird and literal cartoons [6].
There are several ways in which the positive effect of humour
on memory can be understood. Humour can act as a strong
retrieval cue, because (a) humorous information is
remembered better, thus becoming an efficient cue and
because (b) it activates deeper processing which leads to a
stronger association between the humorous content and the
material that has to be remembered [7]. When used in a
classroom setting, humour can have additional beneficial
effects on learning, such as creation of a favourable
atmosphere in the classroom, which is related to better
retention of content [8], creation of a more pleasant social
climate, hence altering and negating the various barriers
present in the traditional classroom setting[9], and increased
interest in subject matter for the students, as well as the
teachers.[10]
However, the positive effects of humour on learning are not
uncontested. It has been reported that for some individuals,
humour present in the material to be remembered may
increase tension and thus result in already tense individuals
performing worse [11]. On the other hand, Terry and Woods
have obtained contrary resultsshowing that humour might
only have an indirect effect on learning by relieving anxiety
faced by learners [12]. The relationship between tension and
humour is therefore quite complex.
Abstract: Humour is seen to have largely positive effects on learning, but these effects are not left uncontested. Furthermore, the
fact that humour is culture specific can limit the generalizability of studies. The current paper, thus, attempts to determine if
humour can have an important role in the cultural context of India.
The current study investigated the effect of humour on learning in a real-world educational setting. 56 participants from the 8th
grade of the same high school were enlisted for the study, and divided into two groups in a classroom setting- one group receiving
humorous material and the other group receiving non-humorous material.
All content was displayed via slideshows spanning 5 subtopics of the school subject of ‘English’. All content was equated in
terms of visual imagery and amount of information displayed. An intervening task of solving math problems was introduced
between viewing the content and answering the post-test.
Results were obtained using a pre-post design. Data was analysed via 2 sample independent t-tests and bivariate correlations.
Results showed that the material presented in a humorous manner is remembered better than other equivalent visual non-
humorous material. Secondly, exposure to humorous material is also correlated with better engagement with the material, and
positive affect. These results draw attention to the need for further, culture-specific research investigations in the field of humour,
as it can prove to be a very effective learning tool.
Keywords: Humour, Learning, Education
International Journal of Education and Psychological Research (IJEPR) Volume 3, Issue 3, September 2014
53
Furthermore, the fact that humour can be very culture-
specific limits the generalizability of its effects. Morain
(1991) specifies culture as the biggest challenge in
understanding humour (as cited in Bell, 2009) [13].
Jiang et al illustrates differential attitudes between American
and Chinese students towards the use of humour. Within the
study, the Chinese participants rated their humour
appreciation almost the same as the American participants
did, but the implicit association tests showed that they
devalued the use of humour- often by associating it with
unpleasant words. [14].
This, in turn, might affect the use of humour in a learning
situation differently when used with different populations.
Thus, studies pertaining to participants from a Western
culture might not hold true for participants in Eastern
cultures. Nevertheless, studies reporting positive effects of
humour are not limited to the western culture. Takashi and
Inoue found a clear better recall of doodles with humorous
content with Japanese undergraduate students [15]. These
results are comparable to an earlier study on American
students (of Schmidt [16]), which used a humorous cartoon
learning paradigm. The similarity between the two studies
and their findings point towards humour being a similar
phenomenon across different cultures. Given the scarcity of
research on humour in eastern cultures, more studies are
clearly needed.
The inconclusiveness regarding this domain as seen in
previous research, coupled with the need for a culture-
specific understanding of the effects of humour resulted in the
current paper.
Our study is designed to explore the impact of humour on
learning when it is presented in a classroom setting. High
school students were presented with school material in a
humorous or non-humorous manner. Students were
randomly assigned to 2 groups. In the experimental group the
learning material was presented in a humorous way, whereas
in the control group the same learning material was presented
in a casual way. The design used was a pre-test post-test one.
We expect (1) that educational content, when presented in a
humorous manner will result in better learning and memory
than when it is presented in a non-humorous manner; (2)
higher engagement with the learning material in the
experimental group.
II. METHODOLOGY
Participants
Fifty-six participants were students studying in the 8th grade
of Surajba Vidya Mandir High School. The school was
chosen randomly among schools suitable by convenience of
location and class strength. All students were assessed in their
regular school classes. All participants were enlisted in the
study in return for 2 educational and humorous sessions that
would be conducted later. There were 41 male participants
and 15 female participants.The students were chosen from
the 8th grade, as their school syllabus content at this stage
matched the kind of content the testing situation needed.
Materials and Procedure
The students were assessed in their regular school classes.
One classroom was assigned to be the experimental group
while the other was the control group. Students were told that
they would have 2 hours’ worth of activities. Each classroom
had 3 investigators. At first, a pre-test was handed out to all
students together with verbal instructions. The students were
given 10 minutes to complete a 25 items questionnaire, which
tested English grammar - consisting of 13 multiple-choice
questions, 4 fill-in-the-blank, and 8 open-ended questions.
Students were ensured that test performance would not affect
their school grades in any manner.
The pre-test was followed by a teaching intervention in the
form of a PowerPoint presentation on English grammar. They
were instructed not to disrupt the presentation, and were
requested to pay attention to the slideshow. The written
content on each slide was read out by the experimenter in a
clear and audible voice. All slides were exposed for time
enough for the experimenter to read out the contents on the
slide and pause for 5 seconds. The content on the slides
differed across the 2 groups. The experimental group was
shown a presentation with the learning material presented
and explained in a humorous way, such as using wordplay
and the creation of alternate realities and narratives. The
control group was presented with the identical learning
material presented in a regular, non-humorous way. The
slides were identical in additional variables like the size of
font, colours used, number of characters present etc.
After the presentation, the participants were given the
numerical task sheet, and were asked to answer them. The
numerical task sheet consisted of 15 multiple choice
questions involving algebra and simple calculus. The
questions matched the kind of math questions the students
solved in school. 10 minutes after the distribution, they were
stopped, and the sheets were collected. The participants were
then administered the post-test sheet, which was a parallel
version of the pre-test. Instructions were identical to the pre-
test.
Finally, all subjects were individually interviewed by the
experimenter. Funniness ratings, affect, interest in the task,
and their overall reaction to the tasks were assessed in a semi-
structured way. The interviewer converted the responses of
the subjects into a rating scale. Funniness ratings ranged from
‘Not at all funny’=0 to ‘Very funny’=4 in a 5-point rating
scale. Engagement was seen as being classified into one of 3
groups- ‘highly engaged with positive affective’=2,
‘undecided/no visible affect’=1, ‘disinterested and bored
with negative affect’=0. Subjects were then debriefed
regarding the purpose and intent of the experiment. They
were also asked for their consent to use the data collected for
research purposes.
Statistical analysis
Data preparation was conducted with Microsoft Excel
(Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA), and on statistical
analyses were carried out in SAS 9.3 (SAS Institute Inc.,
Cary, NC, USA).
At first the effectiveness of the humorous intervention in
conveying humour (manipulation check) was tested
International Journal of Education and Psychological Research (IJEPR) Volume 3, Issue 3, September 2014
54
by comparing humour rating between the 2 experimental
groups via 2-sample independent t-test. To test the between
group differences in learning, we first created difference
score by subtracting the pre- from the post-test ratings, and
then tested those in a 2-sample independent t-test. A further t-
test was conducted to assess the effects of the humorous
intervention on task engagement.
Finally, to test for dependencies among the variables
involved, we computed bivariate correlations among
learning success, task engagement, humour perception and
baseline performance.
III. RESULTS
The pre-test was completed with a success rate of 38.3%
correct answers, with a rate of 37.6% in the EG and a rate of
39.0% in the CG. The post-test was completed with a success
rate of 55.8% correct answers, with a rate of 60.1% in the EG
and a rate of 51.2% in the CG. The two groups also differed in
their perception of humour, with mean funniness ratings
judged to be 2.69 in the EG as against a 0.88 in the CG. This
difference was significant at an alpha level of 0.001, thus
demonstrating the effectiveness of our intervention to
produce humour.
As far as learning was concerned, subjects exposed to the
humorous content had a mean score increase of 5.66 points
from pre-test to post-test, while subjects exposed to the
equivalent visual non-humorous content had a mean score
increase of only 3.04. Thus, better learning is seen to have
taken place in the experimental group, and this difference of
scores between both the groups was significant (t=3.02,
p<0.01). Additionally, subjects in the experimental group
also reported more engagement with the task, and less
boredom as compared to the control group (EG=1.8, CG=1.5,
t=2.05, p<.05). The perception of humour correlated
positively with task engagement (r=0.3, p<.05).
IV. DISCUSSION
The current study investigated the effect of humour on
learning in a real-world educational setting. One group of 8th
graders received humorous content while the other group
received non-humorous content. Results were obtained using
a pre-post test. The major findings of this research can be
summarized as follows. Firstly, material presented in a
humorous manner is remembered better than other equivalent
visual non-humorous material. Secondly, exposure to
humorous material is also correlated with a higher perception
of humour, and with a higher degree of engagement with the
material, and positive affect. These findings could not be
better explained by previous knowledge as measured by
baseline performance.
The humorous intervention in the experimental group was
clearly successful, which was shown in the significantly
higher humour ratings in this group as compared to the
control group. Better learning was seen to have taken place in
the experimental group who were exposed to the humorous
content. This difference can be attributed mainly to the effect
of humour as both groups were equated on visual imagery and
content. These results are similar to Schmidt et al’s 1994
study, which reported that humorous sentences were better
remembered than non-humorous sentences.
Besides the positive effect on learning, our humorous
intervention was also associated with engagement with the
task. Participants in the experimental group described the
content to be more interesting and less boring, and also
reported an overall positive affect as compared to the control
group. This is in accord with previous work by Casper, who
found that humours major role was the creation of a pleasant
classroom atmosphere, which lead to better retention of
content [17]. Additionally, the relation between humour,
memory and affect is also explained by Ziv, who points out
that since emotions are processed within the same system as
memories and there is a discernible link between the two,
humour that is integrated into content that needs to be
remembered leads to better memory due to the positive
emotions it creates [18]. Engagement was also found to be
significantly correlated with humour, which suggests a
relationship between the 2 factors. Since our intervention was
designed to induce humour, it is likely that engagement with
the task resulted as a consequence of humour. However, a
correlative result cannot be interpreted as any type of
causation. Further study is needed to elucidate the
relationship between these two variables.
Other aspects of humour also merit consideration with regard
to learning. For example, the kind of humorous technique that
is used also plays a role in learning. Humorous narratives that
involve unusual material (such as that seen in this
experiment) lead to more spontaneous elaboration than usual
material [19]. According to Atkinson & Shiffrin (1968),
humour is also seen to play a role by increasing rehearsal of
the to-be-remembered material (as cited in Schmidt, 1994)
[20], but this fact is highly debated in the academic
community. Although the current experiment did not tackle
this aspect by measuring it, it does deserve future
investigation.
The experiment, however, had several limitations. Firstly, the
study utilized a small and homogeneous sample of subjects
consisting of 56 students of the same age, from a single
school, and derived from the same socioeconomic status.
This wouldlead the researchers to be cautious about
generalizing the results to all of India. Nevertheless, despite
the low N a significant relationship between group effects of
humour was found. Secondly, the learning content was
limited to the subject of English. Findings for other different
subjects such as Mathematics and the natural sciences might
therefore differ. Finally, the experiment only dealt with an
immediate recall test. There is the need to test for such effects
using a delayed recall test as well.
However, the experimental scenario can be evaluated
favourably on many different parameters. Since the learning
material of both groups was identical, apart from the
humorous elements, the results can solely be attributed to the
independent variable. The tasks used in the experiment
closely reflect the educational learning system of the country.
The closeness of our design and intervention to a real world
scenario speaks for the practicability and effectiveness of
humorous interventions similar to ours in a class setting.
International Journal of Education and Psychological Research (IJEPR) Volume 3, Issue 3, September 2014
55
V. CONCLUSION
Our study clearly illustrates the positive effects humour has in
an educational learning paradigm. The effect of humour on
learning having being validated in a cultural setting such as
India points towards the generalizability of findings
involving humour and memory. Claims of the universality of
such a phenomenon cannot be made without undertaking
more extensive research studies, involving a greater and more
representative sample as well as including more varied topics
of learning. Such studies have important implications for the
manner in which education is imparted in classroom settings,
and advocate for humorous techniques to be used in
educational settings.
VI. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors express their gratitude towards Laugh Out Loud
Ventures, without which the current study could not have
been completed. The authors are immensely grateful to
Vaibhav Devanathan, Malvika Adukia and Antara Telang for
their constant support at every stage of this study- right from
conception, to execution and submission.The authors also
thank their colleagues Sera Arora, Vinit Mevada, Avee
Purohit for assistance whilst conducting the study, and Ayush
Baheti for hishelp with the treatment and analysis of data.The
authors would also like to thank Prof. Linda Dhakul for her
immeasurable help. The authors also thank Surajba Vidya
Mandir and their staff for assisting us with their time and
resources.
VII. REFERENCES
[1] Paul-Emile Chiasson. (2002). “Using Humour in The
Second Language Classroom”. The Internet TESL
Journal. Vol.8, No.3
[2] Ronald A. Berk, R. A. (2001). “The active ingredients in
humour:Psychophysiological benefits and risks for
older adults.” Educational Gerontology, 27(3-4), 323-
339.
[3] Robbie R. Fitzpatrick. (2010). “The Impact of Integrated
Humor on Memory Retention and Recall Aspects of
Adult Learning” (Doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M
University).
[4] Ronald A. Berk (2000),“Does Humor in Course Tests
Reduce Anxiety and Improve Performance?”, College
T e a c h i n g , 4 8 : 4 , 1 5 1 - 1 5 8 , D O I :
10.1080/87567550009595834.
[5] Stephen R. Schmidt and Alan R. Williams (2001),
“Memory for humorous cartoons”, Memory and
Cognition, 29(2), 305-311.
[6] Stephen R. Schmidt and Alan R. Williams (2001),
“Memory for humorous cartoons”, Memory and
Cognition, 29(2), 305-311.
[7] Stav Atir (2010). “Memory for information paired with
humorous, relevant jokes.” New Haven, CT: Yale.
University Senior thesis.(AQ: Unpublished thesis, Yale
University, New Haven, CT.).
[8] Ruth Casper. (1999). “Laughter and humour in the
classroom: Effects on test performance.”
[9] Donald T. Mogavero. (1979). “It's Confirmed: J-
Students Like Humor in the Classroom.” Journalism
Educator, 34(1).
[10] Nancy D. Bell. (2009). “Learning about and through
humour in the second language classroom.” Language
Teaching Research, 13(3), 241-258.
[11] Jacob Levine & Robert Abelson, R. (1959). “Humor as a
disturbing stimulus.” The Journal of general psychology,
60(2), 191-200.
[12] Roger L. Terry & Margaret E. Woods, (1975), “Effects of
Humour on the Test Performance of Elementary School
Children”, Psychology in the Schools, Vol.12, Issue. 2,
pp.182-185.
[13] Nancy D. Bell. (2009). “Learning about and through
humour in the second language classroom.” Language
Teaching Research, 13(3), 241-258.
[14] Feng Jiang & Xiao Dong Yue, (2011), “Different
attitudes towards humour between Chinese and
American students: Evidence from the Implicit
Association Test”, Psychological Reports, 109,1, 99-107
[15] Masanobu Takashi & Tomoyoshi Inoue, (2009), “The
effects of humour on memory for non-sensical pictures”,
Acta Psychologica, 132, 80-84
[16] Stephen R. Schmidt & Alan R. Williams (2001),
“Memory for humorous cartoons”, Memory and
Cognition, 29(2), 305-311.
[17] Ruth Casper. (1999). “Laughter and humour in the
classroom: Effects on test performance.”
[18] Avner .Ziv. (1988). “Teaching and learning with
humour: Experiment and replication.” The Journal of
Experimental Education, 57(1), 4-15.
[19] John R. Anderson., & Lynne R. Reder. (1979). “An
elaborative processing explanation of depth of
processing.” L.; S. Cermak and FIM Craik, Eds., Levels
of Processing in Human Memory (Erlbam, 1979), 385-
404.
[20] Stephen R. Schmidt. (1994). “Effects of humour on
se nte nce mem ory. Jo urn al o f Exp erime nta l
Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(4),
953.
... Banas et al. (2011) argue that the vast majority of research on the use of humour in education has focused on its positive consequences in the classroom, particularly in terms of how it increases motivation and learning. Thus, humour has psychological and physiological benefits, promotes memory and comprehension and can increase students' emotional engagement with the task or subject at hand, as well as making it more interesting and less boring (Sambrani et al., 2014). In addition, it helps to deal with stressful situations that also occur in the teaching-learning process, especially when working on controversial topics . ...
... It also allows for closer cultural and emotional ties between students and teachers, reflecting the educators' ability to bring the topics closer to the students, and can serve to remove social barriers and generate a sense of group feeling (Booth-Butterfield et al., 2007;Hoad et al., 2018). In short, humorous content achieves better results in a learning paradigm than non-humorous material (Garner, 2006;Sambrani et al., 2014). ...
... In this regard, several studies consider that the educational use of humour, understood in its diverse typology, from the most innocent to the most satirical or sarcastic (Anderson & Becker, 2018;Jones & McGloin, 2016;Skurka et al, 2019), favours engagement (Sambrani et al., 2014) and critical awareness (Mora, Weaver & Lindo 2015), and promotes action (Verlie, 2018). Regarding the future use of irony as an educational tool, Bengtsson and Lysgaard (2023) suggest refraining from sarcasm, and to engage with irony that comes close to what one appreciates, rather than resorting to a group or social beliefs with which one and others might not identify, which can easily lead to resentment. ...
Article
Full-text available
This article is an exploratory analysis of the use of humour in Environmental Education, from the perspective of 10 Spanish specialists and educators. Research is carried out using a qualitative methodology through semistructured interviews and a focus group of specialists. The results point to a positive perception of the use of humour and the need for flexibility on the part of the educator to adapt to the particularities of the group and the topics addressed. The differences of opinion lie in the limitations in the use of humour as well as in the recommendations made by the specialists participating in the study, which, given their background, can be considered relevant to the use of humour for environmental education in the Spanish context.
... Actually, multiple aspects of learning could be achieved through giving students the opportunity to laugh during the classroom activities (Moran, & Hughes, 2006). In fact, students can remember things well while offered in a humorous manner instead of non-humorous method (Sambrani et al., 2014). The audience of every lecture needs to be persuaded and influenced by the use of humor so that they can enjoy and feel good about it (Reece, 2014). ...
... The findings of this research revealed that humor is stimulus in awaking learners to be actively engaged during the classroom. Sambrani et al., (2014) also found that the exposure of humorous materials is correlated with active engagement which shows positive effects in learning. Adding humor to our lesson plans is an essential tool which should be highly focused in all educational institutions. ...
Book
Full-text available
2022 International Conference on Multidisciplinary Research (MyRes) 8-9 December 2022, The Ravenala Attitude Hotel, Balaclava, Mauritius
... Actually, multiple aspects of learning could be achieved through giving students the opportunity to laugh during the classroom activities (Moran, & Hughes, 2006). In fact, students can remember things well while offered in a humorous manner instead of non-humorous method (Sambrani et al., 2014). The audience of every lecture needs to be persuaded and influenced by the use of humor so that they can enjoy and feel good about it (Reece, 2014). ...
... The findings of this research revealed that humor is stimulus in awaking learners to be actively engaged during the classroom. Sambrani et al., (2014) also found that the exposure of humorous materials is correlated with active engagement which shows positive effects in learning. Adding humor to our lesson plans is an essential tool which should be highly focused in all educational institutions. ...
Article
Full-text available
A smooth transfer of knowledge from instructor to student is what is desired in any learning context. One of the essential methods in making this happen is the use of humor in teaching. This study sought the influence of humor as a teaching tool on the student's engagement in classroom learning from students’ point of view and to find out the availability and extent of humor used as a teaching tool in the classes of Kandahar University from students’ perspective. The study employed a quantitative research-based survey design and used a questionnaire to collect data from a sample of 370 participants. The findings revealed that humor as a useful teaching tool positively influences students’ classroom learning engagement but it is not utilized by most teachers as a teaching tool.
... Animated television aimed at young audiences indeed has a "marked impact" (Pillar, 2011, p. 70) on developing minds and thus entertainment media can be a means of informal educational learning (Pathmanathan, 2014). Popular animated shows have the ability to be both entertaining and educational, because emotional and/or humorous connections that they often employ to entertain audiences also support learning (Pathmanathan, 2014;Sambrani et al., 2014) and memory reinforcement (Gibb, 2007). Although the evidence of the use of humorous animated television as a pedagogical tool is unclear at present, with studies pointing to risks associated with the use of humors comics and illustrated cartoons in the classroom (Strong, 2013;Sambrani et al., 2014), further research is necessary to understand the impact of entertainment media as a pedagogical tool. ...
... Popular animated shows have the ability to be both entertaining and educational, because emotional and/or humorous connections that they often employ to entertain audiences also support learning (Pathmanathan, 2014;Sambrani et al., 2014) and memory reinforcement (Gibb, 2007). Although the evidence of the use of humorous animated television as a pedagogical tool is unclear at present, with studies pointing to risks associated with the use of humors comics and illustrated cartoons in the classroom (Strong, 2013;Sambrani et al., 2014), further research is necessary to understand the impact of entertainment media as a pedagogical tool. Entertainment media for children has the potential to be an underutilized locus in which subconscious exploratory and educational knowledge transfer occurs-with increased research indicating that children are active "explorers" rather than "passive recipients" (Valkenburg and Janssen, 1999) whilst consuming entertainment programs. ...
Article
Full-text available
Stereotypical representations about what scientists do, look like, and how they behave are cognized in early childhood and refined throughout life, through direct or indirect contact with the STEM communication climate, whether it be direct interactions with scientists, science education, communique, or entertainment. Popular media (TV) plays an important role in influencing our ideas of science by constructing images of social science reality. What has rarely been discussed in these contexts is what kind of scientific stereotypes are reinforced or challenged in popular TV shows for young audiences, particularly regarding female scientists. Using qualitative textual analysis, this paper examines how female scientists are portrayed through humor (and what kind of humor) in two popular animated entertainment series for children— Spongebob Squarepants and Adventure Time —and how their portrayal reinforces or challenges gender stereotypes in cultural representations of science. The analysis revealed that science was portrayed as humorously framed non-science, often represented by exaggerated ever-computing datasets on larger-than-life computer screens that would rival NASA. However, the representation of the female scientists in these animated TV comedies was steeped in archaic stereotypes that, surprisingly, were barely associated with humor: it was the science, not the female scientist per se , that was comic. Interpreting these findings in light of science communication research, gender studies, popular entertainment studies and humor studies, this article adds new perspectives to our understanding of humor in science narratives and the public imagination, and provides new insights for the study of the intangible aspects of science in culture.
... Some research has been conducted to investigate if humour can be used in education cross-culturally (e.g. Sambrani et al. 2014), and indeed suggested that it can be. However, further research should be done to explore cultural differences in this area, and also to examine the differences across cultures in other notable areas, such as trust in science. ...
... Data about the humor quality during instructional and non-instructional presentation as well as about the distribution of humoristic aspects during presentations and the language engaged in order to express humor are other important aspects to be discussed and to be taken into consideration (Shoda & Yamanaka, 2021). Sambrani et al. (2014) conducted a study where 56 8 th grade Indian students were involved. Using a material presented in a humorous manner has a positive effect. ...
Article
Full-text available
Humor, as part of our lives, is also extremely important in different professional settings. Speech and language therapy (SLT) sector is addressing both children and adults with specific language disorders or with non-specific language disorders, secondary to different syndromes or disabilities. In the SLT area, humor is a way through which therapy sessions can be easily introduced, it being an intrinsic modality of approaching children and adults. This article illustrates the data collected in the first Romanian study regarding humor use in the SLT sector, focusing on the way humor is perceived by specialists, but at the same time on the participants’ needs regarding the enriching of the SLT field with more materials both digitally born and/or printed. This study presents extended descriptive data that help us consider humor as a vital element during speech therapy sessions, independently of the professionals’ age, gender, experience and to create a collection of data regarding humor use in speech therapy for future therapeutic effective interventions. Thus, the most relevant collected data are as follows: of the 210 participants in this research just 12 (5.7%) responded that they do not use humor in their professional sector; 94.3% use humor in language disorder therapy activities; 39% use humor in every therapeutic session; more than 68% of participants use verbal humor during their sessions; 199 (94.8%) say that therapeutic materials with humorous content are mainly presented in traditional format (physical material resources); 129 responded they use humor (61.4%) in virtual format too - (digital resources); 68 % of the participants strongly agree/agree that a humor assessment tool is necessary for the effective use of humor in language disorder therapy.
Article
Full-text available
A key component of good teaching and learning is the influence of secondary school teachers' sense of humor and emotional maturity, which affects the classroom environment, teacher-student relationships, and teaching efficacy. According to research, teachers who have a good sense of humor tend to get along better with their students and foster a more positive and welcoming classroom environment, which can boost academic achievement and student motivation. The ability to control one's emotions, relate to one's students, and act professionally even in trying circumstances is a sign of emotional maturity, which can lower stress, increase job satisfaction, and improve general wellbeing. Research indicates that teachers who exhibit high emotional maturity are generally more effective in their teaching practices. There are notable differences in the effectiveness of instruction between male and female teachers who exhibit extreme emotional maturity and immaturity. In addition, studies have shown how important a sense of humor is in relation to emotional maturity, and the results indicate that male teachers typically have a more developed sense of humor than female teachers. Overall, humor and emotional maturity have a variety of effects on secondary school teachers, and knowing how these elements interact can help with professional development, teacher preparation, and school leadership.
Article
People with visual imparments (PWVI) encounter challenges in accessing cultural, historical, and practical information in a predominantly visual world, limiting their participation in various activities, including visits to museums.Museums, as important centers for exploration and learning, often overlook these accessibility issues.This abstract presents the iMuse Model, an innovative approach to create accessible and inclusive museum environments for them.The iMuse Model centers around the co-design of a prototype voice assistant integrated into Google Home, aimed at enabling remote navigation for PWVI within the Basilica Cistern museum in Turkey.This model consists of a two-layer study.The first layer involves collaboration with PWVI and their sight loss instructors to develop a five level framework tailored to their unique needs and challenges.The second layer focuses on testing this design with 30 people with visual impairments, employing various methodologies, including the Wizard of Oz technique.Our prototype provides inclusive audio descriptions that encompass sensory, emotional, historical, and structural elements, along with spatialized sounds from the museum environment, improving spatial understanding and cognitive map development.Notably, we have developed two versions of the voice assistant: one with a humorous interaction and one with a non-humorous approach. Users expressed a preference for the humorous version, leading to increased interaction, enjoyment, and social learning, as supported by both qualitative and quantitative results.In conclusion, the iMuse Model highlights the potential of co-designed, humor-infused, and culturally sensitive voice assistants.Our model not only aid PWVI in navigating unfamiliar spaces but also enhance their social learning, engagement, and appreciation of cultural heritage within museum environments.
Article
Full-text available
Background and Objective: One of the most sensitive parts of the education system in every person's life is elementary school. A period that plays a very important role in the life of each person; and the success or failure in this period will have very serious effects on the future of the individual. Meanwhile, the role and importance of mathematics is felt more than other subject matters as many students are weak in this course. For this reason, the teaching of this course should be changed from a strict and inflexible subject matter that is limited to lecturing to various approaches in accordance with mathematics education and active teaching methods along with new educational technologies. Educational technology and e-learning are some of the concepts that were introduced and attracted a lot of attention in the field of education with the growth and development of information and communication technologies (ICTs). Recently, Wanser proposed a theory of educational humor processing, a theory that has evolved from the basic models of persuasion and incompatibility theories to explain the role of educational humor in facilitating learning. This research conducted with the aim of evaluating the effectiveness of the electronic humorous content on the learning and retention of students' mathematics. Methods: The present study was a semi-experimental research using pre-test-post-test design with experimental and control groups. The population consisted of all 5th grade students (N=2200) in elementary schools at Birjand in 2018. The statistical population of the study consisted of 58 people who were selected with convenience sampling. The study sample included a class as the experimental group and another class as the control group selected out of four classes, each consisting of 29 people. For data collection, Teacher-made test used in pre-test and post-test. In addition to, descriptive analysis, covariance test used to analyze the data. Findings: There is a significant difference between the mean scores of the experimental and control groups' mathematical learning variable. Regarding ETA, we can say that using humorous content, explains 15.4% of the variance of post-test scores (ƞ 2 = 15.4%،p< .05). There was no significant difference between the mean scores of pre-test and post-test of retention in the experimental group compared to the control group. The findings of this study showed that the effect of humorous electronic mathematical content on learning was significant (15%), but the effect of humorous electronic content on retention was not significant. Conclusion: The use of e-content is a step forward toward the effectiveness of the teaching and learning process. The application of this research results for pedagogues is that in order to improve mathematics learning, we should pay attention to the role and function of humorous education and electronic content; and by combining these two direct mathematical teaching methods to create interest in this subject matter. Combining the process of teaching mathematics with humorous e-content will increase students' attention and motivation, improve their mathematical learning, and foster their creative power. The findings of several studies suggest that providing opportunities for collaborative, moderated, and competitive learning in schools can help reduce anxiety and improve students' math performance. This requires a systematic and purposeful effort on the part of the education system to bring about a change in math textbooks and teaching methods. For this reason, it is necessary to take essential measures to make the e-content as effective as possible. This requires that professionals, teachers, and all educators collaborate effectively and efficiently to successfully design and produce e-content.
Article
Full-text available
Although cross-cultural research indicates that Chinese people demonstrate less humor than do Americans, little research addresses the reasons. This cross-cultural difference may be largely due to different implicit attitudes toward humor held by Chinese and Americans, deeply rooted in the two cultural traditions. Both self-report evaluation and the Implicit Association Test (IAT) were used to compare Chinese and American attitudes toward humor. Although 60 Chinese undergraduate students showed no significant difference from 33 American exchange students in explicit attitudes toward humor, the former associated humor more frequently with unpleasant adjectives and seriousness with pleasant adjectives on the IAT; the opposite pattern was found for the American group. This indicated a negative implicit attitude toward humor among the Chinese students.
Article
Full-text available
Memory for humorous and nonhumorous versions of sentences was compared. Humorous sentences were better remembered than the nonhumorous sentences on both free- and cued-recall tests and on measures of sentence recall and word recall. These effects persisted when subjects were warned that they were about to read a humorous sentence but were attenuated in incidental learning and limited to within-subjects manipulations. In incidental learning, recall was also scored as a function of subjective ratings of humor. Subjective humor affected memory in both within- and between-subjects designs. Attention, arousal, rehearsal, retrieval, and surprise explanations were explored. Results suggest that humorous material receives both increased attention and rehearsal relative to nonhumorous material.
Article
Full-text available
Incidental memory for three types of cartoons was compared: original cartoons, literal translations of the originals, and weird cartoons created by inserting incongruous material into the literal translations. In Experiment 1, the three types of cartoons were mixed together in lists. In Experiment 2, each list contained only two cartoon types. In both experiments, original cartoons were remembered better than the literal and the weird cartoons, whereas the literal and the weird cartoons were equally well remembered. The detection of incongruities, or attempts to resolve those incongruities, cannot adequately explain the observed humor effects. The results were also inconsistent with both rehearsal and distinctiveness interpretations. Rather, humor per se appears to support good memory performance. Perhaps participants elaborated or gave sustained attention to humorous material at the expense of less humorous material.
Article
Humor produces psychological and physiological effects on our body that are similar to the health benefits of aerobic exercise. These benefits are some of the best kept secrets from those persons who probably have the most to gain from that information - older adults. Many of them who must live with chronic pain, arthritis, rheumatism, emphysema, memory loss, depression, and stress may be able to cope better with their conditions or find temporary relief by using humor. This article presents an up-to-date, comprehensive synthesis of 30 years of research evidence on 15 psychophysiological benefits of humor and laughter with their implications for older adults. The specific risks for this growing segment of the population also are identified. Strategies for communicating this information through publications and formal presentations by health educators working in gerontology are suggested. A curriculum outline is provided for use in developing short, feature presentations or integrating the content into existing exercise and health-related courses and programs. If these efforts are effective, eventually the health benefits of humor and laughter will be as familiar to our senior citizens as the risk factors associated with heart disease and smoking.