ArticlePDF Available

Developing Effective TEFL Course with WebCT

Authors:

Abstract

One of the commonly used learning management systems that can facilitate the teaching­learning process is the WebCT (Web Course Tool). The WebCT has several tools (such as email, discussion board and links). This paper discusses how different WebCT tools can be used to develop an effective TEFL (Teaching English as a Foreign Language) course for fourth­level students specialized in English. A questionnaire was used to explore the participants' interest in using WebCT; to identify the main technical difficulties facing participants using WebCT and to investigate how WebCT can influence affective and pedagogical factors that play a key role in learning efficiently and effectively.
4/19/2016 CALLEJOnline
file:///E:/Associate%20Prof%20Oct%202011/CALLEJ%20Online.html 1/19
ISSN1442438X
CALLEJOnline
Vol.7,No.1,June2005
DevelopingEffectiveTEFLCourse
withWebCT
NazmiAbdulSalamAlMasri
nmasri@mail.iugaza.edu
TheIslamicUniversityofGhasa,Palestine
Abstract
Oneofthecommonlyusedlearningmanagementsystemsthatcanfacilitatethe
teachinglearningprocessistheWebCT(WebCourseTool).TheWebCThas
severaltools(suchasemail,discussionboardandlinks).Thispaperdiscusses
howdifferentWebCTtoolscanbeusedtodevelopaneffectiveTEFL(Teaching
EnglishasaForeignLanguage)courseforfourthlevelstudentsspecializedin
English.Aquestionnairewasusedtoexploretheparticipants’interestinusing
WebCT;toidentifythemaintechnicaldifficultiesfacingparticipantsusing
WebCTandtoinvestigatehowWebCTcaninfluenceaffectiveandpedagogical
factorsthatplayakeyroleinlearningefficientlyandeffectively.
Introduction
Inrecentyears,hundredsofuniversitieshavedevelopedInternetbasedcourses
usingonelearningmanagementsystemoranotherforeitherdeliveringdistance
learningcoursesorsupplementingteachingclassesoncampus.Asanyother
teachingtoolsormethods,usingInternetbasedlearninghasseveraladvantages
anddisadvantagesthatcanbesummarizedasfollows.
AdvantagesofInternetbasedlearning
1.Itsupportsthedeliveryanduseofmultimediaelements,suchassound,
video,andinteractivehypermedia(McNeil,Robin&Miller,2000citedin
Burgess,2003).
2.Itcanprovideflexibleandconvenientlearningschedulesthatcanovercome
sometraditionalbarrierssuchastimeandplace.
3.Astudentcanstudyindependentlyonlineortakeaninstructorledonline
class,whichcombinesthebenefitsofselfstudywiththoseofmore
4/19/2016 CALLEJOnline
file:///E:/Associate%20Prof%20Oct%202011/CALLEJ%20Online.html 2/19
traditionalclassroombasedlearning(Ryan,2001citedinBurgess2003).
4.Itallowsaccesstoglobalresourcesandexperts.
DisadvantagesofInternetbasedlearning
1.Thereislittleornodirectcontactwiththefacultymember.
2.Itmaydevelopfeelingsofisolation.
3.Ithasadifficultlearningcurveinhowtonavigatewithinthesystem.
4.Itmayleadproblemswiththetechnology.
5.Itincreasesleadtimerequiredforfeedbackregardingassignments
(SmallwoodandZargari,2001inBurgess,2003).
6.ItneedstheuseofhardwareandsoftwarenecessaryforInternetbased
learningwhichmightnotbeavailable.(Burgess,2003).
Theeffectoftheseadvantagesanddisadvantagesmaydifferfromoneteaching
contexttoanother,dependingonvariousfactorssuchasthelearningmanagement
systems(software)adopted,studentnumber,coursecontentandpurpose.Oneof
thesecommonlyusedandpromisinglearningmanagementsystemsisWebCT
(WebCourseTools)whichhasrecentlybeguntocatchtheattentionofmore
studies(e.g.AlAyyat,2003;Burgess,2003;MurphyandLindner,200?;Pauley,
2000;&TittenbergerandNazarko,2003).Mostofthesestudiesexploretwomain
issues:technicaldifficultiesfacingWebCTusersandstudents’perceptionsto
WebCT.Oneoftheareasthatsuchstudieshavenotinvestigatedishowcertain
WebCTtoolscanbeusedtosupplementEnglishlanguagecoursestaughton
campus.AnotherareaofconcernishowWebCTcaninfluencetheaffectiveand
pedagogicalfactorsneededforlearningthelanguageefficientlyandeffectively.
IntegratingWebCTtoolsintotheTEFLcourse
WebCThasmorethantwentytoolsthatcanallbeusedtoenhancecampus
learningandfacilitatefulldistancelearningcourses.Appendix(A)outlinesthe
mainWebCTtoolsandtheirfunctions.Whichtoolstochooseforteachinga
particularcoursedependsonthecontent,requirementsandcomponentsofthe
coursetobetaughtaswellastechnicalfactorsrelatedtoaccessibility.Inthe
contextofthisstudy,tensuitableWebCTtools(listedinAppendixB)are
activatedtoenhancethequalityoftheTEFLcoursewhichwasgivento
undergraduateEnglishlanguagestudentsstudyingattheIslamicUniversityof
Gaza,Palestine.TheTEFLcoursecoversseveraltopicsrelatedtopreparing
studentstoteachEnglishasaforeignlanguage.Appendix(C)liststhesetopicsas
wellastheaims,outcomesofthecourse.
StudyPurposes
Thisstudyintendstoachievethefollowingpurposes:
1.Todescribeandexplorestudents’interestinandfamiliaritywithusing
4/19/2016 CALLEJOnline
file:///E:/Associate%20Prof%20Oct%202011/CALLEJ%20Online.html 3/19
WebCTasasupportivetooltooncampusclasses.
2.ToidentifythemaindifficultiesrelatedtousingWebCTinacourseentitled
TEFL(TeachingEnglishasaForeignLanguage).
3.ToexploretowhatextentWebCTcanaffectseveralaffectiveand
pedagogicalfactorsthatplayakeyroletoinacquiringessentialskillsof
learningandteachingEnglish.
Affectiveandpedagogicalfactors
Althoughthereisnogeneralagreementonspecificdefinitionofaffectivefactors,
manyeducatorsagreeontheimportanceofthesefactorsinlanguagelearning.In
oneofhisPh.D.thesisarticles‘LiteratureReview:AffectinLanguageLearning’,
Finch(2000)reportsthat
“Stern'sclaimthat‘theaffectivecomponentcontributesatleastasmuchand
oftenmoretolanguagelearningthanthecognitiveskills’issupportedbya
largebodyofrecentcrossdisciplinaryresearchshowingthataffective
variableshavesignificantinfluenceonlanguageachievement(e.g.Gardner
1985;Skehan1989;Spolsky1989;Gardner&MacIntyre1992;1993a;)”
AccordingtoFinch(2000),
Arnold&Brown(1999)provideamorecontemporaryperspectivefromthe
viewofthelanguagelearnerasanindividual(anxiety,inhibition,
extroversion/introversion,selfesteem,motivation[extrinsic/intrinsic],
learnerstyles)andasaparticipantinasocioculturalsituation(empathy,
classroomtransactions,crossculturalprocesses).Thesetwoarticleswillbe
usedhereasthebasisfordiscussionandthereaderisreferredtothemfora
moredetailedexaminationoftheissues
Finch(2000)addsthat
Arnold(Ed.1999)definesaffectintermsof‘aspectsofemotion,feeling,
moodorattitudewhichconditionbehaviour’,whileDickinson(1987,p25)
describesitasbeingconcernedwiththelearner'sattitudetowardsthetarget
languageandusersofit,andwithhis/heremotionalresponses”.
Scovel(1978,p31)definesaffectivevariablesas"thosethatdealwiththe
emotionalreactionsandmotivationsofthelearner;theysignalthearousalofthe
4/19/2016 CALLEJOnline
file:///E:/Associate%20Prof%20Oct%202011/CALLEJ%20Online.html 4/19
limbicsystemanditsdirectinterventioninthetaskoflearning".
Inthelightofstudiesdiscussedabove,affectivefactorsareusedheretoreferto
tenpsychologicalandmotivationalfactorsessentialforsuccessfullearning:
interest,selfconfidence,motivation,confidenceinteacher,
autonomy/independence,excitement,attitude,patienceandperseverance,
interpersonalfriendship,andanxietyandtension.
Pedagogicalfactorsarerelatedtodevelopingskillsandabilitiesthatenhance
learningandteachingEnglishasaforeignlanguagethroughusingWebCTtools
tosupplementfacetofacelectures.Theseexperiencebasedfactorsinclude
exposuretoavarietyofpracticalTEFLskills:givingabetterpresentationona
TEFLaspect,gatheringinformationtoeasedoingaresearchpaperonaTEFL
aspect,exposuretoopposingteachingconcepts,increasingcommunicationwith
theteacher,exchangingpedagogicalopinionswithmorefreedom,understanding
contentandachievingcourseaims,varyingcourseactivitiesandassignments,
developingwritingandcommunicationskills,abilitytocopewithchallenging
learningandteachingtechniques.Assuchallthesefactorswouldproduce
languagelearnersandteacherswhocanlearnandteachthelanguageeffectively
andefficientlyandthusachievetheaimsoftheTEFLcoursetakenbyparticipant.
Participants
Thepopulationofthisstudyconsistsofallstudents(N=40)enrolledintheTEFL
courseinthesecondsemester2004.Theyarefourthlevelfemalestudents
specializedinEnglishlanguageandliteratureatIUG.Thecourseispartofafour
yearB.Aprogrammethatpreparesstudentstobeteachers.Becausenotall
participantswerefamiliarwithWebCT,abrieftrainingcoursewasgiventothem.
Therefore,allparticipantswerefamiliarisedwithusingWebCTjustfewdays
beforetheTEFLcoursebegan.Othercolleaguesteachingothercourseswerealso
usingtheWebCTwiththesamegroupofparticipants
Datacollection
Athreepartquestionnaireisusedfordatacollection.Thethreepartsrelateto
technical,affectiveandpedagogicalfactorsthataffectlearning.Inadditionto
including26multiplechoiceitemsinthethreeparts,2openendedquestionsare
usedtogivestudentsopportunitytoexpresstheiropinionopenlybyaddingany
additionalrelevantcomments.Thelistingofallquestionscanbefoundin
Appendix(D).Acopyofthequestionnairewassenttotheparticipantsatthelast
weekofthesemester.Thestudentsweregiventhechoicetosubmititbackeither
byemailorhand.All40participantsrespondedtothequestionnaire.Most
studentsrespondedbyemail.
DataAnalysis
ThemaindataelicitedfromthequestionnairearecollectedfromfivepointLikert
scaleresponses(StronglyAgree;Agree;Neutral;Disagree;StronglyDisagree).
Thedataareanalysedbyusingdescriptivestatisticsoffrequencycountand
4/19/2016 CALLEJOnline
file:///E:/Associate%20Prof%20Oct%202011/CALLEJ%20Online.html 5/19
percentagescores.
Results
Thestudyresultscanbeoutlinedinthefollowingtablesandfigures.
1.WebCTAccessLocation
Table(1)showsthatthemajorityofstudents(60%)accessedWebCTfrom
university(publiccomputerlabsandlibrarycomputers)whichexplainsthe
technicalproblemstheyfaceaswillbeshownlater.
Table(1)WebCTAccessLocations:
FrequencyAnalysis
Studentsanswer Frequency Percentage
Universitypubliclabs 31 42%
Homecomputer 24 32%
Librarycomputers 13 18%
Internetcafé 6 8%
Total 74 100%
2.ReasonsfornotfeelingcomfortablewithWebCT:FrequencyAnalysis
Figure(1)showsthepercentagesofthefivetechnicaldifficultiesstudents
facewhentheyuseWebCT.Themostcommondifficultyistheslow
connectiontotheInternet.Only13%respondedwithfacingnotechnical
difference.
Figure(1)ReasonsfornotfeelingcomfortablewithWebCT
Belowisatechnicalrelatedsampleofcommonlyrepeatednegative
commentsaswrittenbystudentsinthequestionnaire.Theyareorderedin
accordancewithfrequency.
Ittakestimetodownload&typeassignments;notimetouseWebCT
atuniversity
NocomputerorInternetlineathome
Needpropertrainingandpreparation
Needmorepracticetotype
Noeasyaccesstouniversitylabs
UsingWebCTputgreatpressureandstressonstudents
4/19/2016 CALLEJOnline
file:///E:/Associate%20Prof%20Oct%202011/CALLEJ%20Online.html 6/19
ToomuchinformonWebCT
3.MostpreferredWebCTtools
WhenthestudentswereaskedaboutthemostpreferredWebCTtools,they
gaveveryclosescorestomosttools.Table(2)showsthatallparticipantslike
alltoolsalmostequallyasthedifferenceinfrequencyissoslight.Thetable
alsoshowstheresultsinadescendingorderwherethreetools(Linksand
References,Email,andDiscussion)comefirstintermsofrecordingthe
highestfrequencyscore(38?11.2%)andthusthemostliked.Theleastliked
tools,however,areboth“Content”and“GettingExamResults”online.Itcan
beassumedthatstudentsdonotlike“Content”toolasmuchastheother
toolsbecausetheyprefertousetextbookinprint.Butwhatinterestingisthe
students’preferencenottoreceiveresultsbyemail.Thiscouldbeexplained
bytheeffectofaffectivefactorsassociatedwithmarks
Table(2)PreferredWebCTtools
Rank Tools Frequency Percentage
1.
Links&references 38 11.2%
Email 38 11.2%
Discussion 38 11.2%
2. previousexams 37 10.9%
3. Lecturenotes&summaries 36 10.6%
Assignments 36 10.6%
4. Announcements(studenttips) 34 10%
5. Extramaterials 30 9%
6. Content 27 8%
7. Gettingexamresultsonline 25 7.3%
8. Total 339 100%
4.StudentsencourageusingWebCT
Thereisanoverallstudents’supporttoencourageusingWebCTbythe
university.Themajorityofparticipants(30?75%)stronglyagreeto
encourageusingtheWebCTbytheuniversityandsome(9?22.5%)agreed
onsuchsupportbutonlyonestudentwhoexpressedherdisagreementon
promotingtheuseofWebCT.Suchhighratio(97.5%)ofsupporttousing
theWebCTatlargerlevelattheuniversitycouldbeduetothedifferent
affectiveandlinguisticbenefitstheparticipantsgainedfromusingWebCT.
Belowisasampleofpositivecommentsaswrittenbystudentsinthe
questionnaire:
WebCTisverygreatforallstudentsandmustbeinallcourses.
4/19/2016 CALLEJOnline
file:///E:/Associate%20Prof%20Oct%202011/CALLEJ%20Online.html 7/19
TheTEFLcoursewasthemostinterestinginthissemester.
IlikedeverythingputonWebCT
UsingWebCTmakesmemoreactiveandresponsible
IlikeWebCTverymuchbecauseitgivesmeachancetoexpressmy
thoughtsandexchangeideaswiththeteacherandcolleaguesfreely.
WebCTisveryusefulandmustbeencouragedtobeusedbyall
students.
5.HowWebCTinfluencesaffectivefactors
TheresultsinTable(3)showageneralagreementamongstudentsonthe
positiveeffectsofWebCTonaffectivefactorsneededforsuccessfullearning
butwithlittledifferenceinthedegreeofsucheffect.Themostcommon
positiveeffectisonenhancingselfconfidenceandlearningindependence,
followedbydevelopingafeelingofpatience&perseveranceneededtobea
successfullanguagelearner&teacher.Howevertheleasteffectison
motivatingstudentstoparticipateinclass.Onepossiblereasonforthiscould
beusingtheWebCTcommunicationtools(emailanddiscussion).
Table(3)HowWebCTinfluencesaffectivefactors
AffectiveeffectsofWebCT
Strongly
agree&
agree
Neutral>
Agree&
strongly
disagree
No. % No. % No. %
1. Increasedmyinterestin
TEFL 32 80% 8 20% 
2. Enhancedselfconfidence 35 87.5% 3 7.5% 2 2.5%
3. Motivatedmetoparticipate
moreinclassroom 25 62.5% 10 25% 5 12.5%
4. Strengthenedconfidencein
thecourseinstructor 29 72.5% 5 12.5% 6 15%
5. Helpedmetobemore
independentlearner 35 87.5% 2 5% 3 7.5%
6.
Increasedmyexcitement
aboutlanguagelearning&
teaching
32 80% 6 15% 2 5%
7.
Developedamorepositive
attitudetowardsthe
instructor
32 80% 6 15% 2 5%
8.
Developedafeelingof
patience&perseverance
neededtobeasuccessful
languagelearner&teacher
33 82.5% 7 17.5% 
Developedbetter
interpersonalfriendshipwith
4/19/2016 CALLEJOnline
file:///E:/Associate%20Prof%20Oct%202011/CALLEJ%20Online.html 8/19
9. theinstructor&other
colleagues
31 77.5% 7 17.5% 2 5%
10.
(PreviousExamTool)
reducedanxiety&tension
aboutexams
27 67.5% 7 17.5% 6 15%
6.HowWebCTtoolsinfluencepedagogicalfactors
Again,Table(4)showsageneralagreementonthepositivepedagogical
effectsofusingWebCTontheparticipantswherethevastmajority(97.5%)
approvedtheusefulnessofWebCTinprovidingthestudentswithavariety
ofpracticalTEFLskills.Anotheradvantageinratio(95%)isdeveloping
writingandcommunicationskillsneededtocontactwithcolleaguesandthe
teacher.
Table(4):HowWebCTtoolsinfluencepedagogicalfactors
Pedagogicaleffectsof
WebCTTools
Strongly
agree&
agree
Neutral
Agree&
strongly
disagree
No. % No. % No. %
1. WebCTenhancedfaceto
facelectures 33 82.5% 5 12.5% 2 5%
2.
"References&Links"and
"ExtraMaterial"provided
mewithavarietyofpractical
TEFLskills
39 97.5% 1 2.5%
3.
"Reference&Links"and
"ExtraMaterial"helpedme
togiveabetterpresentation
onaTEFLaspect
32 80% 8 20% 
4.
"Reference&Links"and
"ExtraMaterials"provided
richresourcesforgathering
informationthatmadeit
easiertodoaresearchpaper
onaTEFLaspect
35 87.5% 5 17.5% 
5.
"Reference&Links"and
"ExtraMaterial"exposedme
toavarietyofopposing
teachingconcepts&
techniques
36 90% 4 10% 
6.
"Discussions"and"Mail"
encouragedmeto
communicatefrequentlywith
theinstructor
37 92.5% 1 2.5% 1 2.5%
7.
"Discussions"and"Mail"
encouragedmetoexchange 33 82.5% 6 15% 1 2.5%
4/19/2016 CALLEJOnline
file:///E:/Associate%20Prof%20Oct%202011/CALLEJ%20Online.html 9/19
pedagogicalopinionswith
morefreedom
8.
"PreviousExams"enabled
metobetterunderstandthe
coursecontent&achieveits
aimssuccessfully
35 87.5% 3 7.5% 2 5%
9.
"LectureNotes&
summaries"developedmy
writing&communication
skills
38 95% 2 5%  
10.
WebCTenhancedthe
opportunityofvarying
courseactivities:
assignments,research
papers,quizzes,exams,etc.
35 87.5% 5 12.5% 
11.
WebCTenabledmetocope
withchallenginglearning&
teachingsituations
37 92.5% 3 7.5%
Discussion
Fourmajorfindingsemergedfromthisstudy:
1.ParticipantstudentssupportpromotingtheuseofWebCT
Thestudyshowsfavourableresultsconcerningthestudents’perceptionto
thepositiveeffectivenessofWebCT.TheparticipantshavetakentheTEFL
courseenthusiasticallyandenjoyedthebenefitstheygainedduetousing
WebCT.Resultshaveindicatedthatstudentswouldliketocontinuethis
projectnextyear,andthattheyintendtomakeusingWebCTarequired
elementintheircourses.Theseresultsresemblethefindingsofseveral
relatedstudies(AlAyyatetal,2003;Burgess,2003;MurphyandLindner,n.
d.;Pauley,2000;&TittenbergerandNazarko,2003)conductedindifferent
contexts.ForinstanceMurphy&Lindner(n.d.)concludethatsuchpositive
responsesare
“goodnewsforteacherswhoareincorporatingorwishtoincorporate
technologyintotheirteachingasameansforimprovingteaching....Itis
hopedthatasWebCTandotheronlinecoursetoolsbecomemore
commonplace,andasstudentsbecomemorefamiliarwiththetechnology,
studentlearning,teachereffectiveness,andcourseefficiencieswillimprove.”
2.WebCTpositiveeffectsonaffectivefactors
Oneofthecentralissuesthathasstrongagreementamongtheparticipantsis
theimportanceofWebCTinimprovingthelevelofaffectiveand
4/19/2016 CALLEJOnline
file:///E:/Associate%20Prof%20Oct%202011/CALLEJ%20Online.html 10/19
motivationalfactorsvitalforsuccessfullanguagelearning.Resultsindicate
thatWebCThaspositivelyaffectedthetenpsychologicalfactorsincludedin
thequestionnaireandmentionedabove.Theaffectivedomainandthe
emotionalfactorswhichinfluencelanguagelearninghavebeenofinterestin
thefieldoflanguageteachingforanumberofyears.Manyeducatorssupport
thebeliefthateffectiveandsuccessfullanguagelearningcannottakeplace
withoutthepresenceofthesefactors.Manygrowingstudieshavealsoshown
thatusingusefultechnologybasedapproachestolanguagelearning,
includingWebCT,wouldenhancethesefactorsindifferentways.Inthis
context,Benson(2001,p140)andToyoda(2001,p9)statethatusing
technologybasedapproachestolanguagelearningsupportsstudentsfeeling
ofautonomy.
Emphasizingtheimportanceofmotivation,VanLier(1996,p98)arguesthat
motivation"isaveryimportant,ifnotthemostimportantfactorinlanguage
learning",withoutwhicheven'gifted'individualscannotaccomplishlong
termgoals,whateverthecurriculaandwhoevertheteacher.MantleBromley
(1995,p383)presumethat"Ifweattendtotheaffectiveandcognitive
componentsofstudentsattitudes,aswellasdevelopdefendablepedagogical
techniques,wemaybeabletoincreasethelengthoftimestudentscommitto
languagestudyandtheirchancesofsuccessinit."
3.WebCTpositiveeffectsonpedagogicalfactors
Again,thefindingsofthisstudyreportthatthetools“Links&References,
Email,andDiscussion”haveallequallyoccupiedthehighestrankamongall
othertoolsintermsofofferingpedagogicalbenefits.Theyarefollowedby
thetoolsof“Previousexams”,LectureNotesandSummaries”.Combining
thequestionnaireresponseswiththeresearcher’sclassroomobservationsand
oralcommentsexpressedbystudentsduringthesixteenweekcourse,
possiblejustificationscanbeoutlinedasfollows.
a.ThetoolofLinks&Referencesworksasapersonalminielibrary
thatprovidesstudentswithclassifiedweblinkstoavarietyofTEFL
sourcesrangingfromeencyclopediasandfreeejournalstoarticles
relatedtodifferenttopicsandskillscoveredinthecourse.For
instance,websitesrelatedtoteachingvocabularyweregroupedunder
asubheadingcalled“TeachingVocabulary”.Similargroupedlinks
wereofferedforteaching,grammar,writing,pronunciation,etc.Such
categorisedlinksfacilitategatheringinformationrelevanttotheoral
presentationandtermpapereachstudentwasrequiredtodotopassthe
course.Additionally,thisclassificationsavesstudentsalotof
searchingtimethroughhelpingthemreachneededmaterialsquickly.
Furthermore,classifyingsuchwebsiteshasprovedtobestrongly
encouragingtothelearnersespeciallyinanenvironmentwherethe
universitylibraryispooratbooksandreferences.
b.Emailisusedtofacilitatecommunicationbetweenstudentsand
4/19/2016 CALLEJOnline
file:///E:/Associate%20Prof%20Oct%202011/CALLEJ%20Online.html 11/19
instructor.Studentscancontacttheinstructoratanytimewherethey
canposequestions,givecommentsandexpressopinions.Suchfacility
canencourageshyfemalestudentstoparticipateandbemoreactivein
theprocessoflearning.Also,havingprivatemailinsideWebCThelps
toorganizeandstoremailspecifictothecourseinsteadofgetting
mixedupinalltheotheremailthatflowsintoafaculty'ssystem.”
c.Discussionisusedtodiscussandexchangeinformationabout
particularcontroversialteachinglearningissues,e.g.usingL1in
teachingEnglish,teachingdeductivelyorinductively,objectiveand
subjectivetests,etc.Everystudent(individually,inpairsorgroups)is
expectedtoparticipateinthediscussionofarelevanttopicagreed
uponeverytwoweeks.
d.Previousexamfamiliarisestudentswithexamsformatgivenbythe
sameinstructororotherteachersinpreviousyears.Thistoolguides
students’focus,reducesanxietyandtensioncausedbyexamsand
providesmorepracticeactivitiesthatenhanceacademicachievement.
e.Lecturenotesandsummarieswhichrequiretwostudentsto
separatelysummariseeverylecturegivenbytheteacherandevery
presentationgivenbystudentsononeofthecoursetopicsandthen
postthenotestotheinstructorwhointurnputsthemonthistool.This
tooleasedthepressureonstudentsduringlecturessothatinsteadof
concentratingalltheireffortsontakingnotes,theycanconcentrate
moreonunderstandingthelecture.
4.OvercomingWebCTtechnicaldifficulties
Thenegativeresponsesandcommentsexpressedbytheparticipantsover
accessingtheirWebCTandthelongtimeneededfordownloadingrequire
morefocusedattentionandimprovementsonthepartofcoursedesignersand
ITspecialiststokeepthestudents'enthusiasmaboutWebCT.Thechallenge
ofmakingfastaccessing,fastdisplaying,andfastloadinginternetbased
softwarehasbeenstressedbyseveralrecentstudies(AlAyyatetal,2003;
Everheart,1996;Kelly,2000&MurphyandLindnern.d.)asabasiccriterion
forkeepingthevisitor’senthusiasm.Apossiblesuggestiontokeepstudents’
positiveattitudetowardsWebCTistoincreasestudents’awarenessabout
thistechnicalproblemandtoofferhighlyvaluableanduniquecontentthat
meetstudents’needsandmakethemfeelthatthecontentqualityisworththe
timespent.Inthisregard,AlAyyatetal(2003)assertthat“Accessibility
problemscanbereducediffacultyadheretocertainguidelineswithrespect
tothematerialstheypost,andtakeintoconsiderationthatfilesizeincreases
downloadtimeforstudents.Additionally,toreduceincompatibilities,
materialsshouldbemadeavailableinaglobalfileformatsuchasPDF...”.
Anothersuggestionistokeep“theconsistencyinpagelayoutsandpage
elementsandmenusasthiswillnotonlyhelptomakeawebsiteattractive
butalsoaidwebvisitorstofindtheirwayaroundthesiteanddonotgetlost
inthecyberspace(Tittel&James,1995inEmbi2004).
4/19/2016 CALLEJOnline
file:///E:/Associate%20Prof%20Oct%202011/CALLEJ%20Online.html 12/19
Conclusion
ThissudyinvestigatedfouraspectsrelatedtoWebCT:theparticipants’levelof
interestandattitudetowardsWebCT,theaffectivefactorsinfluencedbyWebCT,
thepedagogicalfactorsinfluencedbyWebCTandtechnicalproblemsfacing
WebCTusers.Theparticipanats’responsestothefirstaspectswerepositiveand
encouraging.Thestudyalsoidentifiedsomekeytechnicalchallengesthatneedto
beovercome.
AlthoughthestudyislimitedtofortyfemalestudentsspecializedinEnglish,its
findingsmayofferaglimpseofhowaparticularsetofstudentsviewsanddeals
withtechnologyinlanguageteachinglearningcontext.Thestudymayalsoaddto
ourunderstandingofhowseveralWebCTtoolscaninfluencekeyfactorsfor
efficientandeffectivelanguageteachingandlearning.Furthermore,thestudy
indicateshowusefulWebCTcanbetosupplementoncampuslectures,especially
ifusedwithstudentswhoarecomfortablewithusingtechnologyanddonot
encounterserioustechnicalproblems.However,tomaximizethedifferent
benefitsofWebCT,furtherresearchneedstobeconductedtakinganothergroup
ofparticipants:largerinsize,mixedingenderandatdifferentstudyleveland
courses.
References
AlAyyat,S.;Bali,M.;Ellozy,A.;ElKoshairy,M.;Mansour,M.&Pappas,W.
(2003)TwoyearsintoWebCT:PerceptionsofAUCstudents.RetrievedJune10,
2004,fromhttp://www.aucegypt.edu/acs/Presentations/studsurvey.pdf
Benson,P.(2001).Teachingandresearchingautonomyinlanguagelearning.
Harlow:PearsonEducationLtd.
Bordonaro,K.(2003)Perceptionsoftechnologyandmanifestationsoflanguage
learnerautonomy.CALLEJonline,5(1).RetrievedJuly5,2004,
fromhttp://www.clec.ritsumei.ac.jp/english/callejonline/81/bordonaro.html
Burgess,LA.(2003)WebCTasanelearningtool:Astudyoftechnology
students’perceptions.Journaloftechnologyeducation.15/1.RetrievedJune26,
2004,fromhttp://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JTE/v15n1/pdf/burgess.pdf
Embi,M.A.(2004)DevelopmentandevaluationofanESLwebsiteonlearning
tolearnEnglish.CALLEJonline,6(1).RetrievedJune15,2004,
fromhttp://www.clec.ritsumei.ac.jp/english/callejonline/91/contents61.html
Everheart,J.(1996).Webpageevaluationworksheet.RetrievedJune10,2004,
fromhttp://www.duke.edu/~de1/evaluate.html.
Finch,A.E.(2000).AformativeevaluationofataskbasedEFLprogrammefor
Koreanuniversitystudents.UnpublishedPh.D.Thesis.ManchesterUniversity,
U.K.RetrievedJune10,2004,fromhttp://www.finchpark.com/afe/.
4/19/2016 CALLEJOnline
file:///E:/Associate%20Prof%20Oct%202011/CALLEJ%20Online.html 13/19
Hussein,SusanB.(2003)Fuelingtheengineoflearning:Usingassessmenttools
onaCMS,WebCT,toimprovestudentoutcomes.RetrievedJune3,2004,
fromhttp://www.montclair.edu/Pages/edtexpo/2003/papers/hussein.pdf
Kelly.C.(2000).GuidelinesfordesigningagoodESLwebsiteforESL
students.TheInternetTESLjournal,4(3).RetrievedJuly5,2004,
fromhttp://iteslj.org/Articles/KellyGuidelines.html
MantleBromley,C..(1995)Positiveattitudesandrealisticbeliefs:linksto
proficiency.Themodernlanguagejournal,79(3),372386.
Murphy,T.H.andLindner,JR.(n.d.)Buildingandsupportingonlinelearning
environmentsthroughWebcoursetools:Itiswhippy,butdoesitwork?Retrieved
June15,2004,fromhttp://agnews.tamu.edu/saas/Murphy.htm.
Naidu,S.(2003)Trendsinfacultyuseandperceptionsofelearning.learningand
teachinginaction2(3).RetrievedJuly2,2004,
fromhttp://www.ltu.mmu.ac.uk/ltia/issue6/naidu.pdf
Pauley,R.(2000)WhousesWebCT?RetrievedJune5,2004,
fromhttp://www.WebCT.com/quickstart/viewpage?
name=quickstart_case_study_rp
Savery,J.R.(2002)Facultyandstudentperceptionsoftechnologyintegrationin
teaching.Journalofinteractiveonlinelearning,1(2).RetrievedJuly5,2004,
fromhttp://www.ncolr.org/jiol/ARCHIVES/2002/2/05/index.html
Scovel,T.(1978).Theeffectofaffectonforeignlanguagelearning:Areviewof
theanxietyresearch.Languagelearning,28,129142.
Tittenberger,P.&Nazarko,O.(2003)Shouldweupgrade?WebCTatthe
UniversityofManitoba.RetrievedJune5,2004,
fromhttp://www.umanitoba.ca/uts/publications/research/shouldweupgrade.pdf
Toyoda,E.(2001).Exerciseoflearnerautonomyinprojectoriented.CALLEJ
online,(2)2.RetrievedJune3,2004,
fromhttp://www.clec.ritsumei.ac.jp/english/callejonline/52/toyoda.html
VanLier,L.(1996).Interactioninthelanguagecurriculum:Awareness,
autonomy,andauthenticity.London:Longman.
Appendix(A):MainWebCTTools
Tools Briefdescription
1. AddPageorTool
Toaddpagesofcoursecontent,WebCTtools,orlinks
towebsitesandexternalapplicationstothecourse,
e.g.ExtraMaterialPage,PreviousExamsPage,
LectureNotesPage,etc.
Tocreateanddistributecourseassignmentsto
4/19/2016 CALLEJOnline
file:///E:/Associate%20Prof%20Oct%202011/CALLEJ%20Online.html 14/19
2. Assignments students,anddownload,evaluate,andassignagrade
tothecompletedwork.
3. Bookmarks Tocreatetheirowncustomshortcutstokeypages.
4. CDROM Toprovidestudentsaccesstomultimediafilesinstead
ofuploadingthefilestocoursecontent.
5. Chat Topromotedirectcommunication.
6. ContentModule Todevelopthelearningmaterialsinvariousways.
7. Discussions Todiscussandexchangeinformationaboutparticular
topic.
8. Glossary Tolistdefinitionofrelevantterms.
9. Index Tocrossreferencekeytermsandconceptswithinthe
coursecontent.
10. Link ToconnectstudentstositesontheInternetrelevantto
thecoursetopics.
11. Mail Forcommunicationbetweenstudentsandinstructor
andstudents.
12. MyGrades Toreleasegradestostudents.
13. MyNotes
(Annotations)
Tohavestudentscreatetheirownannotationsof
varioustextdocumentsthenhavethestudents
compiletheirnotesandsharethemwiththewhole
class.
14. Quizzes Topractisequizzes.
15. Resumesession Topickupatthelastplacestudentswereinthecourse
pathpages.
16. Search Tolocatetopicsinthecourse.
17. SelfTest Topracticeselfansweredtests.
18. Student
Presentations
Tocreategroupsofstudentstodoajointproject
relevanttothecoursetheystudy.
19. Studenttips Tosendannouncementsthatappearsonthescreenas
soonthestudentslogontoWebCT.
20. Syllabus Topresentinformationaboutcourseandinstructor.
21. Whiteboard
Toallowdesigners,students,andteacherstoenter
text,drawobjects,insertgraphics,andmake
modificationinordertohaveonlinediscussion.
Appendix(B):WebCTToolsUsedforteachingTEFLCourse
Tools Function
Links&References
Providequicklinkstorelevantresources(articles,
journals,etc)availableontheInternetthatmaypromote
teachingEnglishasaforeignlanguage.Theselinksare
classifiedaccordingtothetopicsincludedinthecourse.
Forinstance,somelinksgroupedtogetheronhowto
teachpronunciation,reading,writing,etc.
4/19/2016 CALLEJOnline
file:///E:/Associate%20Prof%20Oct%202011/CALLEJ%20Online.html 15/19
Email Facilitatescommunicationamongallstudentstakingthe
courseandbetweenstudentsandteacher.
Discussion
Provideaplatformfordiscussingcontroversialissues
relatedtoteachingEnglishwhereallstudentsare
encouragedtoparticipateinthediscussion.Forinstance,
studentswereencouragedtodebatethisquestion:towhat
extentdoyouagreeonbanningtheuseoflearners’
mothertongueinEnglishlanguageclasses?
Previousexams Itisalinkthatprovidesstudentswithallpreviousexams
onTEFL.
Lecturenotes&
summaries Atoolthatprovidesnotesandsummariestolectures
Assignments Describewrittenassignments,suchaspapersandessays.
Announcements
(studenttips)
Studentscangetannouncementsaboutexams,
assignments,etcassoonastheylogontotheWebCT.
Extramaterials
Thistoolprovidesstudentswithextrasupplementary
articles,essaysandinformationrelevanttothecourse
topics.
Content Thistoollinksstudentstothemainecontentofthe
course.
Gettingexamresults
online
Throughthistool,studentscangetaccesstoviewthe
resultsoftheirexamsandquizzes.
Appendix(C):TopicsCoveredinTEFLCourse
CourseDescription
ThiscourseisanintroductiontoTeachingEnglishasaForeignLanguage
(TEFL).Itdevelopsthestudents’pedagogicalknowledgeandthebasicskills
neededtoteachEnglishefficiently.Thecourseisdividedinto3mainareas:
Basicteachingcomponents:language,teacher,student,syllabusand
context.
EFLMethodology
Avarietyofteachingtechniques
Aims
Toincreasestudents’awarenessoftheteachinglearningprocessin
Palestine.
Toprovidestudentswithabrief,criticalsurveyofthemainmethods
andapproachestoteachingEnglishasaforeignlanguage.
Toexposestudentstoasmanydifferentteachingtechniquesas
4/19/2016 CALLEJOnline
file:///E:/Associate%20Prof%20Oct%202011/CALLEJ%20Online.html 16/19
possible.
Intendedlearningoutcomes
1.improvingpresentationandinterpersonalskills
2.thoroughpreparationforteachingexperience
3.copingwithchallenginglearningandteachingsituations
4.developingteamworkspirit
Coursetopics
Week1&2:
IntroductiontoTEFL
1.ELTTerminology
2.ReasonswhyPalestinianschoosetolearnEnglish
Week3:
GrammarTranslationMethod&DirectMethod
Week4:
Audiolingualapproach&CognitiveCodeApproach
Week5:
TPR,CommunityLanguage&Learning,SilentWay,&Suggestopedia
Week6:
TheCommunicativeApproach
Week7:
Differencesbetweenteachingyoungchildren&adults
Week8:
Techniquesforpresenting&practicingvocabulary
Week9:
Techniquesforteachinggrammar&functions
Week10:
Techniquesforteachingreadingskills
Week11:
Techniquesforteachingwritingskills
Week12:
Techniquesforteachinglistening&speakingskills
Week13:
Techniquesforusinggames&songs
Week14:
Lessonplanning
Week15:
Revision
Week16:
FinalExam
4/19/2016 CALLEJOnline
file:///E:/Associate%20Prof%20Oct%202011/CALLEJ%20Online.html 17/19
Appendix(D):Questionnaire
A.Technicalfactors
Couldyoupleaseput(X)nexttowhatyouthinktheappropriate
answers?
Inthissemester,IhaveusedWebCTin...
a.TEFLcourseonly
b.TEFLandothercourses
IaccessWebCTfromthefollowinglocation(s)(youcanchoosemore
thanone)
UniversityPublicAccessLabs
HomeComputer
UniversityLibrary
InternetCafé
Istilldon’tfeelcomfortablewithusingWebCTbecause:(youcan
choosemorethanone)
IneedmoreassistanceonWebCT
Icannotaccessuniversitylabseasily
IforgetWebCTinternetaddress
slowconnectionspeciallyfromhomecomputers
Downloading/uploadingfiledifficulty
UsingWebCTshouldbeencouraged
Stronglyagree
Agree
Noopinion
Disagree
Stronglydisagree
Writeliked(L)ordisliked(D)nexttothefollowingWebCTtools
Announcements(Tips)
Syllabus(content)
emailtheinstructorandotherstudentsintheclass
Discussions
lecturenotesandsummaries
Assignments
GettingGradesonline
PreviousExams
Links&References
4/19/2016 CALLEJOnline
file:///E:/Associate%20Prof%20Oct%202011/CALLEJ%20Online.html 18/19
Extramaterials
Addanyothercommentsrelatedtotechnicaldifficultiesyoufaced
duringthecourse.
B.AffectiveFactors
Couldyoupleaseput(X)inwhatyouthinktheappropriateanswer?
1=Stronglyagree
2=Agree
3=Neutral
4=disagree
5=stronglydisagree
Questions 1 2 3 4 5
1. DuetotheuseofWebCT,myinterestinthe
TEFLcourseincreased
2. UsingWebCTmademoreselfconfidentlearner
3. BecauseofWebCT,mymotivationtoparticipate
inclassroomwasimproved
4. UsingWebCTstrengthenedmyconfidencein
thecourseinstructor
5. UsingWebCTmadememoreindependent
learner
6. UsingWebCTmademoreexcitedabout
languagelearningandteaching
7. BecauseofusingWebCT,Idevelopedamore
positiveattitudetowardstheinstructor
8.
UsingWebCTdevelopedthefeelingofpatience
&perseveranceneededtobeasuccessfulELT
teacher
9.
UsingWebCTtools(email&discussion)to
communicatedevelopedinterpersonalfriendship
withtheothercolleaguesandtheinstructor
10.
LookingatWebCTtool"Previous
Exams"decreasedanxiety&tensionabout
exams
C.PedagogicalFactors
Couldyoupleaseput(X)inwhatyouthinktheappropriate
answer?
1=Stronglyagree
2=Agree
3=Neutral
4=disagree
5=stronglydisagree
Questions 1 2 3 4 5
4/19/2016 CALLEJOnline
file:///E:/Associate%20Prof%20Oct%202011/CALLEJ%20Online.html 19/19
1. WebCTisausefultechnologicalsystemthat
enhancesfacetofacelectures
2.
WebCTtools"References&Links"and
"ExtraMaterial"providedmewithavariety
ofpracticalTEFLskills
3.
WebCTtools"Reference&Links"and
"ExtraMaterial"helpedmetogiveabetter
presentationonaTEFLaspect
4.
WebCTtools"Reference&Links"and
"ExtraMaterials"providedrichresourcesfor
gatheringinformationthatmadeiteasierto
doaresearchpaperonaTEFLaspect
5.
WebCTtools"Reference&Links"and
"ExtraMaterial"exposedmetoavarietyof
opposingteachingconcepts&techniques
6.
WebCTtools"Discussions"and"Mail"
encouragedmetocommunicatefrequently
withtheinstructor
7.
WebCTtools"Discussions"and"Mail"
encouragedmetoexchangepedagogical
opinionswithmorefreedom
8.
WebCTtool"PreviousExams"enabledme
tobetterunderstandthecoursecontent&
achieveitsaimssuccessfully
9.
UsingWebCTenhancedtheopportunityof
varyingcourseactivities:assignments,
researchpapers,quizzes,etc.
10.
WebCTtool"LectureNotes&Summaries"
developedmywriting&communication
skills
11. UsingWebCTenabledmetocopewith
challenginglearning&teachingsituations
Biography
NazmiAlMasrihasaPh.DinTEFLandCurriculumDevelopmentfromtheUniversityof
Manchester,UK.Hisresearchinterestsareteachertrainining,academicwriting,andusing
technologyinTEFL.HeteachesattheIslamicUniversityofGaza,Palestine.
Copyright(c)2005NazmiAlMasri&CALLEJOnline(ISSN1442438X).Allrightsreserved.
... Most institutions concentrate on skill building at student level without paying adequate attention to the training of the educational staff. Such training should concentrate at the technical and conceptual levels [2]. ...
... Managing and administering online courses staff had brought with it a need for differing levels of expertise, but they expressed concern over losing control of what they perceived to be their roles and even their rights. Email, discussion, chat and the like are crucial element of e-learning [2]. This interactive capability is viewed as a powerful tool, but staff had not yet come to terms with the demands that were being placed on them through the 24 hour a day x 7 day a week capabilities of e-learning. ...
... Some training courses/workshops were conducted to introduce WebCT capabilities to IUG staff and senior administration as well. As a result of these orientation steps, e-learning project begum to catch the interest of administration and donors; thus , IUG got a limited license for WebCT application with 400 students [2]. ...
Conference Paper
Full-text available
E-learning is a new form of education and is a tool to reach students everywhere. In Gaza Strip it was used to solve the difficulty in movement problem. It was used as an enhancement tool in the educational process. IUG started experimenting with e-learning since 1999. IUG started a systematic approach in developing it e-learning teams. Joint partnership with Middlesex University help set up a system. Couple of courses were available to all university students and limited success was enjoyed
... While, Al-Jarf (2006) revealed the effect of using online learning in EFL vocabulary instruction from home as a supplement tool to classroom instruction. Al-Masri (2005) also indicated how various WebCT tools develop an effective TEFL course for fourth-level learners specialized in English at IUG. Within the same context, Rajaretnam (2004) study was based on using online grammar quizzes as a tool in teaching grammar and EFL learners' skills to use of the computer to access information and as a tool to facilitate English language practice activities. ...
... These different types are suitable with the different TEFL course objectives which vary among listening, speaking, reading and writing skills. Within the same context, some previous studies such as Rajaretnam (2004) and Al-Masri (2005) tested the role of different eLearning tools in helping TEFL learners in achieving course objectives. ...
Article
Full-text available
p>This study aimed at revealing teaching English as a foreign language (TEFL) professors' eLearning experiences during the Covid 19 pandemic in the Gaza Strip higher education institutions. For this end, the researcher designed a (20) open-ended questions questionnaires to be completed by (32) TEFL professors in (8) Palestinian higher education institutions. Results showed that TEFL professors need training to develop their skills in designing, developing and drawing action plan for TEFL e-courses that achieve the objectives of foreign language teaching\ learning. Palestinian TEFL professors spent (4- 7) hours daily preparing, meeting, guiding, helping and facilitating learning by using different eLearning programs and network social media such as Moodle, Google classroom, Zoom, WhatsApp and Facebook. They adopted different teaching methods as well as different types of evaluation and following up in order to measure the objectives achievement; however, they neglected developing thinking and real life skills. The most challenges for both TEFL professors and learners were insufficient knowledge about eLearning and technical problems. TEFL professors action plan was focused on reducing the number of activities and drawing clear procedures with all the needed tools and activities for each objective in the course. Based on the findings, the researcher recommends that higher education institutions should provide training courses in the field of eLearning for both learners and professors, prepare a guide for designing and developing e-courses and provide professional technicians for maintenance of equipment and should regularly fix various technical malfunctions. Article visualizations: </p
Chapter
This study aimed at revealing the effect of some Moodle activities that are used in TEFL courses to develop EFL student-teachers pedagogical knowledge and teaching practices. The sample of this study consisted of (53) third-level student-teachers who were enrolled in the TEFL course during the academic year (2020/2021). The participants studied the TEFL course via Moodle platform during the COVID-19 outbreak. Five different types of Moodle activities were presented to the student-teachers: instructor’s presentations, reading articles and websites, scenario-based tasks and practical studies, practice teaching videos for complete/part lessons and reflection videos from classroom teachers. The participants of the study completed a survey which consisted of (42) items divided into two domains; (16) items for the pedagogical knowledge and (26) items for the teaching practices. The results of the study concluded that the instructor’s presentation activities and scenario-based tasks and practical studies and practice teaching videos had a high effect on developing EFL student-teacher’s teaching practices. The results also revealed that there were no statistically significant differences attributed to gender, however, there were statistically significant differences attributed to the accumulative average among EFL student-teachers’ responses. Based on these results, a set of recommendations were given. KeywordsEFL student-teachersActivitiesPedagogical knowledgeTeaching practicesMoodle platformAnd TEFL course
Article
Full-text available
This research aimed at evaluating the use of WebCT in teaching at the Islamic University of Gaza (IUG) by revealing its advantages and difficulties from the perspectives of: professors, students, and technicians. To fulfill the aim of the research, the researcher followed the descriptive analytical method. They prepared three questionnaires which distributed to the participants. Each one consists of two domains: advantages and difficulties of using WebCT in teaching. Three groups: professors, students and technicians at IUG; were participated to complete the research questionnaires. Frequency, percentage and relative mean were used to analysis the data statistically. The results showed that: -Professors' responses on the advantages of using WebCT in university teaching were scored high ratio for strongly agree and agree, which means that professors got a lot of advantages out of using WebCT in teaching, such as: motivating them to use recent technology and developing their computer skills. -There were some difficulties in using WebCT according to Professors' responses, such as: needing effort and time to design effective WebCT course and difficulties in tracking huge number of students in many courses. -There was a general agreement among students on the advantages of using WebCT in teaching, such as: decreasing the opportunity for practicing book-based learning model and developing students' computer skills. -There were no serious difficulties facing IUG students in using WebCT, except: needing internet access to skim electronic resources and lacking of well-equipment laboratories parallel with students' huge numbers. -Technicians' responses on the advantages of using WebCT in teaching were scored high ratio for strongly agree and agree choices, for example: giving opportunity to store/retrieve a lot of questions and providing ability to reveal and hide course contents. -There were some serious difficulties in using WebCT according to technicians' responses, which are: no support for Arabic language in Glossary tool, absence of voice chat between professor and his students, weakness of users' (professors and students) computer skills, and negative attitude toward employing e-learning from the perspectives of some professors and students. KEYWORDS Evaluation means revealing the advantages and difficulties of using WebCT as instructional enhancement tool from the perspectives of professors, students, and technicians at the Islamic University of Gaza. WebCT (Web Course Tools) is a Web-based course management system that allows faculty to create web sites for courses that enhance or deliver course instruction. Students enrolled in courses supported with WebCT have access to support materials posted by the instructor.
Article
Full-text available
Increasingly, the use of modern technology is coupled with cooperative approaches to learning. The question is how technology affects the exercise of learner autonomy. By presenting evidence of critical incidents and learners' reactions, this article describes how technology-related factors such as computer literacy and beliefs in CALL have affected individual learner's autonomous learning in a Project-Oriented Computer Assisted Language Learning (PrOCALL). The findings suggest that technology can have a positive impact on learner autonomy when learners have extensive experience with technology. However, they also suggest that it can have a beneficial impact on autonomy only when learners perceive technology as a useful tool. The findings indicate that learners' perceptions vary largely according to the level of their computer literacy although the students' perceptions may be modified through positive or negative relationships with other students and the teacher. The article concludes with three conditions necessary for successful autonomous learning: 1) accessible and reliable technology, 2) sufficient computer literacy in students, and 3) good communication with and support from peers.
Article
Full-text available
At the end of the 2003 spring semester, two years after implementing WebCT at AUC, a survey was conducted to get student feedback. An unexpected 1221 students responded. The results showed that a majority of students (68%) would like to see WebCT used in their future courses, and that the most frequently written comment was a call for instructors to use it more often. Seven out of eight advanced features of WebCT were popular with a majority (74-93%) of students when instructors used them, but four of these features, including lecture notes and the discussion tool, were not as widely used as the others. This may partly explain why a majority of students were neutral when asked if WebCT contributed to their learning.
Article
1. The AAA curriculum 2. The curriculum as a theory of practice 3. The growth of proficiency 4. Language awareness and learning to learn 5. Motivation, autonomy, and achievement 6. Authenticity 7. Contingency 8. The curriculum as interaction 9. The profession of teaching development and research References Index
Article
Middle-school-aged students in 12 classes of a 9-week Foreign Language Exploratory (FLEX) program participated in a study attempting to maintain and/or to improve students' attitudes toward French and Spanish speakers, replicating an earlier study (Mantle-Bromley & Miller, 1991) of first-year Spanish students. Students in the treatment group participated in culture-related lessons that used attitude-change theory in their design. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) procedures showed that the experimental group's mean score on a modified version of the Attitudes and Motivation Test Battery (AMTB) (Gardner, Smythe, & Clément, 1974) was significantly greater than that of students in the control group (p < .05). In addition, using the Beliefs about Language Learning Inventory (BALLI) (Horwitz, 1988), the study measured, in an exploratory fashion, students' beliefs about the language learning process. Results demonstrated that many young students enter their first language class with misconceptions about language learning that may hinder their progress and persistence in language study.
Article
This study describes and explores student perceptions regarding the use of WebCT in building and supporting online learning communities (a practical application). Participants were all students enrolled in "AGED 440: Principles of Technological Change," an undergraduate level course at Texas A&M University. Objectives were to describe and explore: (1) how WebCT has or has not contributed to success; whether students used online access to course materials; whether students accessed and tracked their grades and progress online; whether students created an online learning environment between and among themselves and other students in the course; and students' overall perceptions of the use of WebCT. Findings from this study indicate that WebCT contributes to student success. This success, however, is hampered when students do not have easy access to reliable computers with high-speed access to the Internet. Although course materials were available online, students tended to rely on traditional print material over WebCT delivered course materials. WebCT's function for accessing tracking grades and progress online was used more by students than any other function. Students did not or were not able to take advantage of WebCT's function to enhance their learning by creating student centered online learning environments. Students' overall perceptions of WebCT were positive. However, teachers need to recognize and make alternative options for students not willing or unable to use WebCT. (AEF)
Article
Although studies of the relationship between affective factors and language learning proficiency abound in the literature, the evidence to support such a relationship is difficult to interpret. Much of the problem resides in the fact that a wide range of variables are lumped together under the rubric “affect.” An attempt is made to ameliorate this situation by defining affective variables in terms of traditional psychological theory and classifying them as a subset of those variables intrinsic to the learner. The conflicting evidence dealing with one important affective variable, anxiety, is then examined, and it is shown that ambiguous experimental results can be resolved if the distinction between facilitating and debilitating anxiety is drawn. Further classificatory distinctions are discussed from the abundant experimentation undertaken by applied psychologists, and an attempt is made to consider the implications of some of this research for adult language learning–for some of the new methodologies in EFL as well as for future research opportunities.
Article
A preliminary survey of the use of, and perceptions of e-learning by two faculty groups at Manchester Metropolitan University in the United Kingdom found that the practices, concerns, and issues regarding e-learning, and reform in teaching and learning more generally, which confronted these faculties, were not out of the ordinary and were similar to those found in other comparable organizations. Notwithstanding interest among faculty members in e-learning technologies, especially WebCT, and how they might be able to use it to support existing teaching and learning practices, this survey revealed a general lack of engagement in e-learning and revealed a concern among the faculty groups about its potential. The reasons that were proffered for this weak engagement and poor enthusiasm for e-learning included lack in institutional support, time and resources to undertake such activities, as well as a lack of information, knowledge and expertise in such new e-learning technologies.