This article considers the intoxication doctrine, including whether it is evidential or substantive in nature, and what work is done by the basic-versus specific intent distinction. Most importantly, the article analyses the structure of the doctrine itself. Sometimes thought of as a defence, the article argues that it is an entirely different kind of doctrine, one that imposes constructive
... [Show full abstract] liability uponoffenders. Once this is seen, we can better assess its rightful place in the law.