ArticlePDF Available

Cannabinoid Receptor Gene Variations in Drug Addiction and Neuropsychiatric Disorders

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Cannabinoid receptors (CBRs) are involved in neuropsy- chiatric disturbances including drug addiction. Studies show that single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of CNR1 and FAAH may contribute to drug addiction and other neuropsychiatric disorders. However, cannabinoid type-2 receptors (CB2Rs) in the CNS and their role in drug addiction and neuropsychiatric disorders have been much less well characterized. Features of CBR gene structures and their variants in drug abuse and neuropsychiatric disorders and in rodent models were studied. Association studies were performed between polymorphisms in CNR2 gene and neuropsychiatric disorders in two independent case-control populations. We identified novel human and rodent CB2R isoforms with differential tissue expression patterns and regulation by CBR ligands. There is association between polymor- phisms of CB2R gene and neuropsychiatric disorders investigated with increased risk of schizophrenia, depression, drug abuse, and eating and autism spectrum disorders in low CB2R function. CBR variants may provide a deeper insight and novel targets for the effects of cannabinoids in drug addiction and other neuropsychiatric disorders.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Ashdin Publishing
Journal of Drug and Alcohol Research
Vol. 2 (2013), Article ID 235714, 11 pages
doi:10.4303/jdar/235714
ASHDIN
publishing
Review Article
Cannabinoid Receptor Gene Variations in Drug Addiction and
Neuropsychiatric Disorders
E. S. Onaivi,1,3 H. Ishiguro,2S. Sgro,1and C. M. Leonard1
1Department of Biology, College of Science and Health, William Paterson University, 300 Pompton Road, Wayne, NJ 07470, USA
2Department of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Ethics, Graduate School of Medical Science, University of Yamanashi, Ch¯
u¯
o-shi,
Yamanashi 409-3898, Japan
3National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), National Institutes of Health (NIH), 251 Bayview Blvd., Baltimore, MD 21224, USA
Address correspondence to E. S. Onaivi, onaivie@wpunj.edu
Received 5 March 2013; Revised 10 August 2013; Accepted 12 August 2013
Copyright © 2013 E. S. Onaivi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which
permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract Cannabinoid receptors (CBRs) are involved in neuropsy-
chiatric disturbances including drug addiction. Studies show that
single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of CNR1 and FAAH may
contribute to drug addiction and other neuropsychiatric disorders.
However, cannabinoid type-2 receptors (CB2Rs) in the CNS and their
role in drug addiction and neuropsychiatric disorders have been much
less well characterized. Features of CBR gene structures and their
variants in drug abuse and neuropsychiatric disorders and in rodent
models were studied. Association studies were performed between
polymorphisms in CNR2 gene and neuropsychiatric disorders in two
independent case-control populations. We identified novel human and
rodent CB2R isoforms with differential tissue expression patterns and
regulation by CBR ligands. There is association between polymor-
phisms of CB2R gene and neuropsychiatric disorders investigated with
increased risk of schizophrenia, depression, drug abuse, and eating
and autism spectrum disorders in low CB2R function. CBR variants
may provide a deeper insight and novel targets for the effects of
cannabinoids in drug addiction and other neuropsychiatric disorders.
Keywords cannabinoid; CNR2 gene; variants; drug addiction; neuro-
psychiatry
1. Introduction
The ubiquitous cannabinoid receptors (CBRs)—probably
the most abundant binding sites in the CNS—are known to
be involved in a number of neuropsychiatric disturbances
including drug addiction. CBRs are coded in human
chromosomes 1 and 6 and activated by endocannabinoids,
phytocannabinoids and marijuana use (medical/recreational
use). The components of the endocannabinoid system
(ECS) include CNR1 and CNR2 genes encoding these
CBRs (CB1Rs and CB2Rs), endocannabinoids (eCBs),
and their synthesizing and degradation enzymes (Table 1)
which are major targets of investigation for their impact in
neuropsychiatry. The discovery that specific genes, codes
for CBRs are activated by marijuana use and that the
human body makes its own marijuana-like substances—
endocannabinoids [67,74], that also activate CBRs have
provided surprising new knowledge about endocannabinoid
system. Our remarkable new understanding indicates that
the cellular, biochemical, and behavioral responses to
marijuana, which remains one of the most widely used
and abused drugs in the world, are coded in our genes
and chromosomes. With increasing new information from
the decoding of the human genome, many aspects of
genetic risk factors in marijuana use including age of
initiation, continuation, and problem use undoubtedly will
interact with environmental factors such as availability
of marijuana along with the individual’s genotype and
phenotype. These remarkable advances in understanding
the biological actions of marijuana, cannabinoids, and
endocannabinoids are unraveling the genetic basis of
marijuana use with implication in human health and disease.
The two well-characterized cannabinoid receptors, CB1Rs
and CB2Rs, are encoded by CNR1 and CNR2 genes
that have been mapped to human chromosomes 6 and 1,
respectively (Figures 1and 2). A number of polymorphisms
in cannabinoid receptor genes have been associated with
human disorders including ADHD and PTSD [56], drug
dependency [71], obesity [17,43], depression [71,85]
and other neuropsychiatric disorders (see Table 2). Thus,
because of the ubiquitous distribution and role of the
endocannabinoid system in the regulation of a variety
of normal human physiology, drugs that are targeted to
different aspects of this system are already benefiting cancer
subjects and those with AIDs and metabolic syndromes [43].
In the coming era of personalized medicine, genetic variants
and haplotypes in CNR1 and CNR2 genes associated with
obesity or addiction phenotypes may help identify specific
targets in conditions of endocannabinoid dysfunction. Our
previous investigations had defined a number of features of
the CNR1 gene’s structure, regulation, and variation [102],
2Journal of Drug and Alcohol Research
Table 1: Subtypes of cannabinoid receptors.
CB1-R CB2-R
Amino acids 472 AA 360 AA
Chromosome location 6q14-q15 1p34-p35
Gene name CNR1 CNR2
Endogenous ligand 2-AG 2-AG
CNS distribution Yes Yes
Peripheral distribution Yes Yes
SubtypesCB1, CB1A-CBin CB2A and CB2B
See text for isoforms and variants of CB1 and CB2 receptors.
CBin and n=A–E variants.
but many features of CNR2 gene structure, regulation,
and variation still remain poorly defined. However, we
and others have now demonstrated and reported that
variants of the CNR1 gene are associated with a number
of disorders and substance abuse vulnerability in diverse
ethnic groups including European-American, African-
American, and Japanese subjects [6,18,32,33,34,35,102].
Most strikingly, variants of CNR genes co-occur with
other genetic variations and share biological susceptibility
that underlies comorbidity in most neuropsychiatric
disturbances [8]. Thus, emerging evidence indicates that
the endocannabinoid system exerts a powerful modulatory
action on retrograde signaling associated with inhibition of
synaptic transmission [75]. Interestingly a role for variations
in CNR1 gene has been associated with striatal responses
to happy but not to disgust faces [11] with implication that
functional variation of CNR1 genotypes may be associated
with disturbances of the brain involving emotional and
social stimuli, such as autism [11] and depression [19,70].
Here we review and present additional data that focuses
on these recent advances in cannabinoid genomics and the
surprising new fundamental roles that the ECS plays in the
genetic basis of marijuana use and cannabinoid pharma-
cogenomics [67], and pharmacotherapeutics. The powerful
influence of cannabinoid-induced retrograde signaling
modulates GABAergic and glutamatergic systems, which
indicates that the main excitatory and inhibitory systems
are in part under the influence of the endocannabinoid
system. Thus, the genetic basis of compulsive marijuana use
may involve an interaction of CNR genes with other genes
and environmental factors. As with other dependences
with genetic risk factors, the risk for marijuana use is
likely to be the result of CNR genes and other genes and
environmental factors, each contributing a small fraction
of the overall risk [94]. Additional evidence is provided
for the complex CNR1 and CNR2 gene structures and their
associated regulatory elements. In our current ongoing
studies, many features of CNR gene structures, single
nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), copy number variations
(CNVs), CPG islands, microRNA regulation, and the impact
of CNR gene variants in neuropsychiatry and where possible
in rodent models are assessed. Although CNR1 gene has
(a)
(b)
Figure 1: Human CB2 (CNR2, 1p36.1) genomic structure
and alternative spliced transcripts: (a) The gene size is
marked in bp; vertical bars represent exons; triangles rep-
resent splicing patterns; arrows represent nonsynonymous
SNPs. (b) CB2R subtypes, hCB2A and hCB2B, alterna-
tively spliced variants are shown under the gene structure.
more CPG islands than CNR2 gene, both have CPG islands
less than 300 bases, and may also be regulated by DNA
methylation amongst regulatory mechanisms. MicroRNA
binding to the 3untranslated region of the CNR1 gene
with two polyadenylation sites may also potentially regulate
CB1R expression. CNR1 gene has 4 exons and there are 135
SNPs reported in more than 1% of the population with no
common SNP that changes amino acids of CB1R currently
known or reported. A copy number variant (CNV) which
is 19.5 kb found in 4 out of 2,026 people covers exons 3
and 4 and codes amino acid that could alter the expression
of CB1Rs. CNR2 has 4 exons with CB2A with 3 exons
and CB2B with 2 exons; and there are about 100 SNPs
found in more than 1% of the population, which include
common cSNPs that change amino acids of the CB2R,
including R63Q, Q66R, and H316Y. CNVs in Asian and
Yoruba population have been reported. Therefore, studying
the CBR genomic structure, its polymorphic nature, subtype
specificity, their variants, and associated regulatory elements
that confer vulnerabilities to a number of neuropsychiatric
disturbances may provide a deeper insight in unraveling
the underlining mechanisms, as discussed below. Thus,
understanding the ECS in the human body and brain will
contribute to elucidating this natural regulatory mechanism
in health and disease.
2. Variation in cannabinoid receptor genes in drug
addiction and other neuropsychiatric disorders
While the expression of CBRs in humans varies according
to ethnicity and gender [69], variations in other mam-
malian species are also notable. Therefore, a number of
Journal of the International Drug Abuse Research Society 3
Table 2: Genetic polymorphisms of cannabinoid receptor genes (CNR genes).
CNR genes polymorphism Linkage or association References
CB1, Two allele DNA polymorphism Associated with CNR1 gene [66]
CNR1 rs16880261 Associated with cannabis dependence [6]
CNR1 rs4707436 Associated with endocannabinoid effects [6]
CNR1 rs806377 Associated with endocannabinoid effects [6,33]
CNR1 rs1049353 Associated with addictive disorders [6,9,18]
CNR1 rs2023239 Associated with endocannabinoid effects [6,18,21]
CNR1 rs12720071 Associated with endocannabinoid effects [6,18]
CNR1 rs806375, rs806371, rs806368 Associated with drug addiction [16,103]
1359 G/A CNR1 variant Associated with alcohol dependence [22,84]
1359 G/A CNR1 variant Not associated with Tourette syndrome [23]
1359 G/A CNR1 variant Not associated with alcohol withdrawal tremens [80]
1359 G/A CNR1 variant Associated with weight loss [1,2]
3813 A/G and 4895 A/G variant Associated with obesity in men [83]
CNR1 SNPs Not associated with obesity in German children [59]
CNR1 SNPs Associated with obesity and BMI [10,24,42,77]
CNR1, FAAH, DRD2 gene Associated with comorbidity of alcoholism and antisocial [32]
(AAT)nrepeat of CNR1 gene Conflicting associations with drug dependence [28,43]
CNR1 variants, SNPs, “TAG” haplotype Associated with polysubstance abuse [102]
CNR1 SNPs Not associated with polysubstance abuse [30]
CNR1 SNPs Associated with cannabis dependence [3,4,5]
CBR haplotype Associated with fewer cannabis dependence symptoms [33,34,35]
CNR1 SNPs Associated with alcohol and nicotine dependence [13,37]
CNR1 SNPs No association with anorexia nervosa [59,60]
CNR1 (AAT)nrepeats Associated with restricting and binging/purging anorexia nervosa [86]
CNR1 (AAT)nrepeats Associated with depression in Parkinson’s disease [8]
CNR1 SNPs Associated to striatal responses to facial exp [11]
(AAT)nrepeats Association with ADHD in alcoholics [56,79]
CNR1 SNP haplotype Risk factor for ADHD and PTSD [56]
1359 G/A CNR1 variant Associated with schizophrenia [51]
(AAT)nrepeats Not associated with schizophrenia and mood disorders [52,92,93]
(AAT)nrepeats Associated with schizophrenia [57]
(AAT)nrepeats Associated with hebephrenic schizophrenia [12,95]
CNR1 variants Associated with depression and anxiety [19]
CNR1 variants and (AAT)nrepeats Associated with impulsivity [20]
1359 G/A CNR1 tag SNP Associated with antipsychotic response but not schizophrenia [27]
CNR1 SNPs No association with cognitive impairment in MS [99]
CB2, CNR2 SNPs and haplotypes Associated with human osteoporosis [47]
CNR2 SNPs Not associated with cardiovascular risk factors [82]
CNR2 SNPs Associated with bone mass [100]
CNR2 (Q63R) SNP Risk factor for autoimmune disorders [87]
CNR2 (Q63R) but not (H316Y) Associated with alcoholism and depression [40]
CNR2 (rs41311993) Associated with bipolar disorder [58]
confounding factors and disparities arise in different studies
due to the variations in human CBRs dependent on gender
and ethnicity. A number of variations have been found in
genes associated with the ECS including those encoding
the CBRs, and those involved in the synthesizing enzymes
of endocannabinoids including fatty acid amide hydrolase
(FAAH) and metabolizing enzymes like diacylglycerol
lipase alpha (DAGLA). There are a number of reported
mutations in the genes associated with the ECS that lead
to altered mRNA stability and transcription rate with
modification of the encoded proteins. These functional
variations have been associated in a number of studies and
meta-analysis with neuropsychiatric disturbances (Table 2).
We and others have reported that the human CB1R have
a number of splice variants, which may in part account
for the myriad behavioral effects of smoking marijuana.
Up to five isoforms including the canonical/long and
short isoforms are known to be produced by alternative
splicing of the CNR1 transcript [102]. Some effects of
marijuana and other cannabinoids may include actions
at CB2Rs that have received much less attention than
CB1Rs. However, we and others have now identified
4Journal of Drug and Alcohol Research
Figure 2: CNR1 gene structure showing 4 exons with some introns. A number of ESTs have been identified and some of the
SNPs discussed and in Table 1are shown. The CNR1 gene is in human chromosome 6q15. The currently identified structures
of CNR1 isoforms are indicated.
and characterized glial and neuronal CB2Rs in the brain.
Nonetheless, many features of the CNR2 gene structure,
regulation, and variation remain poorly characterized
compared to the CNR1. In humans, the CNR2 gene is
reported to consist of a single translated exon flanked by
5and 3untranslated regions and a single untranslated
exon [87] (see Figure 2). Most regions of the CNR2 gene
are highly conserved, but the human has glutamine at
position 63 instead of arginine [47,87] and another SNP
H316Y has been reported and linked to autoimmune
disorders [47,87]. There has been little or no data on the
role of CB2Rs in neuropsychiatric disorders. However,
in neurological disorders associated with inflammation,
the expression of CB2Rs has been reported in limited
populations of microglial including plaque-associated glia
in Alzheimer’s disease brains [64,76]. Indeed our studies
provide the first evidence for a role of CB2Rs in depression,
schizophrenia, and substance abuse [39,40,66,71,72]. We
and others have identified splice variants of the human
CB1Rs and CB2Rs but they have thus far been poorly
characterized for functional specificity apart from the
broad roles associated with CB1R and CB2R subtypes.
Alternative splicing of RNAs appears to be more common
than previously thought in people, and can generate a variety
of proteins, with most genes producing at least two variants.
The characterization of CBR variants will add validity
to the functional evidence for the existence of multiple
cannabinoid receptor subtypes. It has been demonstrated
in vitro that amino-terminal processing of the hCB1R may
involve a rapid N-terminal truncation in the cytoplasm prior
to translocation to the endoplasmic reticulum membrane.
It was suggested that such a truncation process might be a
way to create a novel type of CB1R isoforms but exactly
how the truncated CB1R may be formed and how the
processing is regulated remains to be determined [63]. In
comparison to the monoaminergic system, the application
of modern techniques to cannabinoid research is new. For
example, molecular cloning has revealed the presence of
serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) receptor subtypes,
which can be subdivided in seven subfamilies [25,94]
serotonin (5-HT) receptor subtypes and growing. New
knowledge on cannabinoid post-transcriptional and post-
translational modifications, such as alternate splicing and
perhaps RNA editing, may indicate formation of multiple
proteins that could unravel specific mechanisms associated
with numerous behavioral and physiological effects of
marijuana use. The cloning and sequencing of CNR1 gene
from 62 species has also been reported [61] and awaits
full characterization. As predicted here, the identification
and characterization of these putative CBR isozymes and
different elements of the ECS may reveal novel targets for
medication development. However, the limitless signaling
capabilities and the endless complexity of the cannabinoid
system require a continuous intensive investigation. Specific
genetic variants and polymorphisms in multiple genes
including variations in the ECS genes have been associated
with neuropsychiatric and other pathophysiology of human
diseases [97]. It is to be noted that depending on the nature
Journal of the International Drug Abuse Research Society 5
of classification, other CBRs exist. The vanilloid receptor 1
(VRI), the site at which capsaicin in hot chili peppers acts, is
a site at which anandamide is a full agonist. As anandamide
is a partial agonist at the CBRs, some have suggested that
VR1 be classified as a CBR subtype. .. may be CB3. In
fact, the endocannabinoid that is a full agonist at the CBRs
is 2-Arachidonyl glycerol (2-AG) [26,90,91]. Another
putative CBR, GPR55, has been suggested as a CBR that
increases intracellular calcium and inhibits mM current [49].
However, using a strategy for defining cannabinoid receptor
functional fingerprints from mutagenesis and molecular
recognition literature data, it was noted that hGPR55 does
not appear to share a similar fingerprint with the hCB1R and
hCB2R [78]. While this could not be considered as a proof
to exclude GPR55 from the CBR family, the data from other
studies strongly suggest that GPR55 is a specific functional
receptor for lysophosphatidylinositol receptor [29,65]. Thus
far, it appears that GPR55 is quite distinct from other GPCRs
and represents an intriguing and unique therapeutic target
whose functional receptor requires a further validation and
characterization [29]. The implication of variations in other
putative CBR genes will certainly contribute to unraveling
of the genetic basis of the ECS in neuropsychiatric
disorders. We are mainly concerned here with the variations
associated with CNR genes. However, a number of putative
endocannabinoids have been identified and anandamide and
2-AG are better characterized. These endocannabinoids are
known to act as retrograde messengers and are released
on demand and undergo enzymatic hydrolysis. While 2-
AG is metabolized by monoglyceride lipase (MGL) and
cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2), anandamide is metabolized by
FAAH and N-acylethanolamine acid amidase (NAAA). The
FAAH1 gene is located on human chromosome 1p35-34
and FAAH2 gene, recently identified, has been mapped to
chromosome Xp11.21 or Xp11.1, while MGL gene is on
3q21.3. The results of studies conducted thus far on the
polymorphisms and haplotype blocks in endocannabinoid
metabolizing enzymes and neuropsychiatric disorders
appear to vary due to disparities and confounding factors
associated with ethnicity, gender, and phenotypes of the
population studied [41,55]. Firm conclusions on the role(s)
of variations and polymorphisms in endocannabinoid
metabolizing enzymes in neuropsychiatry and their
diagnostic value and use in pharmacogenomics needs
more study.
3. CNR1 and CNR2 gene variations in drug addiction and
other neuropsychiatric disorders
CBRs and especially CB1Rs have been described as one
of the most abundant binding sites in the human brain and
many studies have focused on the CNR1 gene variants
in neuropsychiatric disturbances. Hence CNR1 gene is a
candidate for association and linkage studies not only in
the effects of substance abuse and addiction but also with
other neuropsychiatric disorders. However, polymorphisms
in CNR2 gene in neuropsychiatry gained less attention as
CB2Rs were previously thought to be mainly expressed
in immune cells and not expressed in neurons contrary to
new research [38,54,66,67,68,70,71,72,73]. To date many
CNR1 variants have been studied and implicated in different
populations for their impact on a number of neuropsy-
chiatric disorders including substance abuse and addic-
tion, depression, schizophrenia, anxiety, ADHD, PTSD,
impulsivity, neurological disorders including Alzheimer’s,
Parkinson’s Huntington’s, Multiple Sclerosis, Amyotrophic
lateral sclerosis and more (Table 2). Earlier studies on
CNR1 gene variations were on the triplet repeat polymor-
phism (the (AAT)nrepeats) and on the nonsynonymous
1359 A >G polymorphism (rs1049353). For the (AAT)n
triplet repeat polymorphism, and with other variants studied,
caution is required as neuropsychiatric disorders appear to
vary due to disparities and confounding factors associated
with ethnicity, gender, and phenotypes of the population
studied [41,55]. These initial studies found associations
of these variants with schizophrenia, P300 event-related
potentials and substance dependence [14,23,45,51,84].
In our previous mapping of the CNR1 gene locus [102],
we conducted association studies between polymorphisms
and haplotype-specific expression patterns in three human
populations. Common human CNR1 variants assessed
in this study reveal patterns of linkage disequilibrium in
European- and in African-American populations. It was also
shown that a 5CNR1 “TAG” haplotype displays significant
allelic frequency differences between substance abusers
and controls in European-American, African-American,
and Japanese samples [102]. In a review and meta-
analysis of study conducted on three of the most studied
CNR1 gene polymorphisms, rs1049353, rs806379, and the
(AAT)nin addictive disorders, it was reported that only the
(AAT)nrepeats (n>16) in the Caucasian population were
significantly associated with substance dependence [9].
However, specifically the rs1049353 SNP in the CNR1 gene
was found to be associated with heroin addiction only in
Caucasian population [81]. While some polymorphisms in
the CNR1 gene have been associated with some aspects of
drug abuse and addiction such as the (AAT)ntriplet repeat,
rs64546774, rs1049353, and rs806368 (Table 2); many other
polymorphisms were not replicable probably due to various
confounding and co-morbidity factors in the different
studies. As CB2Rs were previously thought to be expressed
in immune cells and referred to as peripheral CB2Rs, the
functional neuronal expression and its variants were less
investigated for roles in neuropsychiatric disorders. Indeed
our studies from mice to human subjects provided the
first evidence for a role of CB2Rs in depression, eating
disorders, autism substance abuse [40,66,71,72], and other
6Journal of Drug and Alcohol Research
neuropsychiatric disorders. CNR2 has 4 exons with CB2A
with 3 exons and CB2B with 2 exons; and there are about
100 SNPs found in more than 1% of the population, which
include common cSNPs that change amino acids of the
CB2R, including R63Q, Q66R, and H316Y. CNVs in Asian
and Yoruba population have been reported. Association
studies were also performed between polymorphisms in
CNR2 gene and schizophrenia [38], eating disorders [38,
39], depression [40,66,70,72], and alcoholics [40,41]in
two independent case-control populations. We also report
on the identification of novel human and rodent CB2R
isoforms, their differential tissue expression patterns and
regulation by CBR ligands. There are associations between
polymorphisms of CNR2 gene and the neuropsychiatric
disorders investigated. Our findings also indicate increased
risk of schizophrenia, depression, drug abuse, and eating
and autism spectrum disorders in low CB2R function and
polymorphisms in CNR2 gene associated with disease
type, ethnicity, and gender. In an Italian population using a
case control study, the association of bipolar disorder was
investigated with three missense SNPs of CNR2 gene [58].
Genetic association between bipolar disorder and 524 A >C
polymorphism was reported and the investigators suggested
that the CB2R may play a role in bipolar disorders. With the
significant association of marijuana use and cannabinoids in
modulating the physiological effects of the ECS, the CNR1
gene has been investigated not only in food intake and the
current obesity epidemic worldwide, but also in a number
of neuropsychiatric problems. Many studies have also
demonstrated CNR1 gene polymorphisms and haplotype
blocks to investigate a number of parameters associated
with eating disorders and obesity [55,97]. Human CNR1
gene polymorphisms associated with eating disorders are
presented in Table 2. Marijuana and cannabinoid induced
psychoactivity is well documented in animal and human
studies, and both CNR1 and CNR2 gene polymorphisms
have been associated with psychosis, multiple sclerosis,
depression, bipolar and ADHD disorders (Table 2). We and
others have studied haplotype blocks in both the CNR1 and
CNR2 genes in human population and disease and addiction
vulnerability [31,41,102].
4. CNVs of cannabinoid receptor gene
A copy number variation (CNV) is a structural variation
in the genome when the number of copies of a gene(s)
varies in the population and this is a source of diversity
and uniqueness between the genomes of individual
humans [101]. These structural variations accounting
for about 12% of human genomic DNA alterations result
in the cell with abnormal copies due to insertions, deletions
or duplications [96]. Normally in the human genome, we
inherit one copy from each parent, but the copy number
varies from two to several copies for some genes. Following
the completion of the human genome sequence, recent
evidence indicates that chunks of DNA and gene(s) can vary
in copy-number (with duplications and/or deletions) and
in some rare instances the gene(s) may not be expressed.
Such CNVs may have functional implications in gene
dosage imbalances by loss or gain in the level of gene
expression [48], and contribute to various complex human
diseases. When CNVs alter the dose of genes critical for
normal brain development and adult brain functioning, they
may cause severe disorders such autism and schizophre-
nia [88]. But the vast majorities of most CNVs are harmless
and impact human health when they alter gene expression
or change gene dosage [88]. Significant advances have been
made in mapping gene variations due to SNPs which were
previously thought to be the most prevalent form of genetic
variations. With advances in genomic technologies, analyses
of CNVs of individual human genomes have been identified
as a major cause of structural variations in those genomes
that are more than the changes caused by SNPs [48]. Indeed
the HapMap project shows that CNVs encompass more
nucleotide content per genome than SNPs, underscoring
CNV’s significance to genetic diversity [89]. It is important
to study CNVs that encompass genes involving duplication
and deletions of sequences and their role in human health,
disease, pharmacotherapeutic and pharmacogenomic
responses. It turned out that CNVs are an important form of
human genetic variation, contributing more than SNPs to the
number of bases differing between human genomes [44].
While CNR1 and CNR2 SNPs have been associated with
a number of neuropsychiatric disorders (Table 2), it is
still unclear to what extent CNR gene CNVs are involved in
neuropsychiatric disorders. Numerous CNVs have now been
identified with various genome analysis platforms [101].
In our studies, many features of CBR gene structures,
SNPs, CNVs, CPG islands, microRNA regulation, and the
impact of CNR gene variants in neuropsychiatry and where
possible in rodent models are assessed. A copy number
variant (CNV) which is 19.5 kb found in 4 out of 2,026
people covers exons 3 and 4 and codes amino acid that
could alter the expression of CB1Rs. For example CNVs
in Asian and Yoruba population have been reported. In our
preliminary CNR2 gene CNV studies, we analyzed one of
the CNV regions located in intron of the CNR2 gene in a
human population of Japanese alcoholics DNA samples in
comparison to non-alcoholic controls. The CNVs in CNR2
gene region were confirmed to be relatively common in
10 out of 420 Japanese people [data not published]. It was
difficult to make a conclusion from the high CNVs of the
CNR2 gene in alcoholics; and more alcoholic DNA samples
and samples from other neuropsychiatric disorders and in
other ethnic populations should be analyzed to understand
and determine the nature of elevated copy numbers of CNR2
gene in neuropsychiatric disease risk. Whether the larger
Journal of the International Drug Abuse Research Society 7
CNR2 gene CNVs in Japanese alcoholics compared to non-
alcoholics are associated with the disease is unknown and
the phenotypic effects are often unclear and unpredictable,
with larger CNVs [48,89]. However, the bigger the CNV,
the more likely it will cause a change in gene dosage [88].
Therefore, the underlying pathogenic mechanism for the
larger CNR2 gene CNV obtained in the sample analyzed in
the alcoholics is currently unknown.
5. Consequences of CNR1 and CNR2 variants
Many CNR gene SNPs and their role in predisposing to
disease have been well documented and studied (Table 1),
but studies on CNR gene CNVs have been less studied
and our understanding of the functional impact of CNVs
in neuropsychiatry is still limited [44]. Many studies have
focused on analysis of regions in the human genome that
vary in copy number in specific disorders, but others have
focused on analysis on regions of which the copy number
never seems to vary in the general population [44]. With
such a strategy, significant associations between some
copy number stable regions have been identified in some
patients with intellectual disability or autism, but not in
controls [44]. It was therefore proposed that copy number
stable regions can be used to complement maps of known
CNVs to facilitate interpretation of patient data [44].
Overall, some CNVs, which may be either inherited or
caused by de novo mutations, have been shown to explain
some of the genetic contribution to common diseases
and may also explain rare uncharacterized disorders [44,
98]. Other factors associated with consequences of CNVs
include whether the copy number variant changes the
sequence or relative location of specific segments of
genomic DNA that act as enhancers or suppressors of
gene expression [15,44]. The higher the number of CNR
gene CNVs and the length of the CNR1 trinucleotide, the
higher the AAT repeats may be associated with aberrant
CNR gene expression and probably modify cannabinoid
induced biological function. CNVs which are a highly
prevalent form of genomic variation can also depend on the
phenotypic and cellular context, and on the environmental
background [15,98]. For example, CNVs in chromosomes
6q14.1 and 5q13.2 have been reported to be associated with
alcohol dependence [53]. The endocannabinoid system is
involved in neuropsychiatric disorders and CB1Rs appear
to be the most abundant binding receptor protein in many
brain regions. A number of CNR1 gene SNPs (Table 2)
are involved in many neuropsychiatric conditions. CNR1
and CNR2 gene polymorphisms are also associated with
the effects of drugs of abuse and addiction and withdrawal
process. The clinical consequences of CNV in the coding
and non-coding CNR gene sequences associated with
human phenotypes and disorders are unknown, but with new
microarray and sequencing technologies, the (epi)genetic
contributions to CNR2 gene CNV can be determined. With
advances in genomic technologies and the analysis and
identification of CNR gene CNVs we may uncover the
relationship between CNR gene CNVs and phenotype and
disease. A significant progress in understanding the nature
of CNVs in the human genome has been achieved, but not
yet extended to CNR gene CNVs apart from our pilot study
described above. Yet accumulating evidence suggests the
importance of CNVs in the etiology of neuropsychiatric
disorders [36]. More studies are needed to determine the
role and contribution of CNR gene CNV to conditions
of endocannabinoid system disorders. We do not know
if CNR gene CNVs will affect the entire subtype CNR
genes and function and whether this may be a factor
with marijuana use as medicine or in the biological
effects after smoking marijuana and the propensity for
its addictive potential in humans. But precise and accurate
data from new genomic technologies will facilitate not
only CNR gene CNVs but also other structural variants
in individual genomes to disease susceptibilities and drug
responses [7,46]. Many CNVs have been reported to affect
complex diseases including autism, schizophrenia, bipolar
disorder, obesity, Crohn’s disease, neurological disorders,
cardiovascular disease, nicotine metabolism and tobacco-
related diseases and more [7]. Ultimately creating animal
models of neuropsychiatric disorders that reflect human
CNV will provide insight into human neuropsychiatric
disorders that will contribute to novel drug screening for
these disorders [62]. Great potential exists for CNVs along
with other genomic variants including SNPs to explain and
predict disorders and traits in the future, but great challenges
exist for understanding the relationship between genomic
changes and the phenotypes that might be predicted and
may be treated or prevented [50].
6. Summary, conclusions, and future perspectives
We now know that CNVs and other variants of the human
genome are more prevalent than SNPs that have been
well studied and analyzed and have been linked to human
disorders. With many thousands of SNPs in the human
genome, and some associated with CNRs, it appears
that their contributions to the genetic basis of complex
diseases are relatively small effects. This has created the
possibility of other genomic variants, epigenetic, and other
nongenetic contributions to complex human diseases. For
the endocannabinoid system many SNPs for both CB1 and
CB2 receptors have been identified and characterized in
a number of neuropsychiatric disorders. Our preliminary
data indicated high CNVs in the CNR2 gene in Japanese
alcoholic patients compared to controls. It was difficult
to make a conclusion from the high CNVs of the CNR2
gene in alcoholics; and more alcoholic DNA samples and
samples from other neuropsychiatric disorders and in other
8Journal of Drug and Alcohol Research
ethnic populations should be analyzed to understand and
determine the nature of elevated copy numbers of CNR2
gene in neuropsychiatric disease risk. Numerous CNVs have
now been identified with various genome analysis platforms.
Whether the larger CNR2 gene CNVs in Japanese alcoholics
compared to non-alcoholics is associated with the disease
is unknown and the phenotypic effects are often unclear
and unpredictable, with larger CNVs [48,89]. However,
the bigger the CNV, the more likely it will cause a change
in gene dosage [15]. Therefore, the underlying pathogenic
mechanism for the larger CNR2 gene CNV obtained in the
sample analyzed in the alcoholics is currently unknown.
While CNR1 and CNR2 SNPs have been associated with
a number of neuropsychiatric disorders (Table 2), it is still
unclear to what extent CNR gene CNVs are involved in neu-
ropsychiatric disorders. Thus, it is important to study CNVs
that encompasses genes involving duplication and deletions
of sequences and their role in human health, disease,
pharmacotherapeutic and pharmacogenomic responses.
Acknowledgments We acknowledge Dr. Qing-Rong Liu for the
pivotal work on cannabinoid receptor gene structures and revision of
CNR2 gene features and for helpful comments and suggestions. E. S.
Onaivi, S. Sgro, and C. M. Leonard are supported by WPUNJ and E.
S. Onaivi is also supported by NIH grant DA032890. We are forever
indebted to Norman Schanz and Dr. Robert Benno for laboratory
animal support and the Dean Dr. Ken Wolf for support of student
workers for the maintenance of research animals. The authors have no
conflict of interest and have received no payments in the preparation
of this manuscript. The findings and conclusions in this manuscript are
those of the authors.
References
[1] J. Aberle, I. Fedderwitz, N. Klages, E. George, and F. U.
Beil, Genetic variation in two proteins of the endocannabinoid
system and their influence on body mass index and metabolism
under low fat diet, Horm Metab Res, 39 (2007), 395–397.
[2] J. Aberle, J. Flitsch, N. A. Beck, O. Mann, P. Busch,
P. Peitsmeier, et al., Genetic variation may influence obesity
only under conditions of diet: analysis of three candidate genes,
Mol Genet Metab, 95 (2008), 188–191.
[3] A. Agrawal and M. T. Lynskey, The genetic epidemiology of
cannabis use, abuse and dependence, Addiction, 101 (2006),
801–812.
[4] A. Agrawal and M. T. Lynskey, Are there genetic influences
on addiction: evidence from family, adoption and twin studies,
Addiction, 103 (2008), 1069–1081.
[5] A.Agrawal,K.I.Morley,N.K.Hansell,M.L.Pergadia,G.W.
Montgomery, D. J. Statham, et al., Autosomal linkage analysis
for cannabis use behaviors in Australian adults, Drug Alcohol
Depend, 98 (2008), 185–190.
[6] A.Agrawal,L.Wetherill,D.M.Dick,X.Xuei,A.Hinrichs,
V. Hesselbrock, et al., Evidence for association between
polymorphisms in the cannabinoid receptor 1 (CNR1) gene
and cannabis dependence, Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr
Genet, 150B (2009), 736–740.
[7] S. Almal and H. Padh, Implications of gene copy-number vari-
ation in health and diseases, J Hum Genet, 57 (2012), 6–13.
[8] F. Barrero, I. Ampuero, B. Morales, F. Vives,
J. de Dios Luna Del Castillo, J. Hoenicka, et al., Depression
in Parkinson’s disease is related to a genetic polymorphism of
the cannabinoid receptor gene (CNR1), Pharmacogenomics J,
5 (2005), 135–141.
[9] A. Benyamina, O. Kebir, L. Blecha, M. Reynaud, and M. Krebs,
CNR1 gene polymorphisms in addictive disorders: a systematic
review and a meta-analysis, Addict Biol, 16 (2011), 1–6.
[10] M. Benzinou, J. C. Ch`
evre, K. J. Ward, C. Lecoeur, C. Dina,
S. Lobbens, et al., Endocannabinoid receptor 1 gene variations
increase risk for obesity and modulate body mass index in
European populations, Hum Mol Genet, 17 (2008), 1916–1921.
[11] B. Chakrabarti, L. Kent, J. Suckling, E. Bullmore, and S. Baron-
Cohen, Variations in the human cannabinoid receptor (CNR1)
gene modulate striatal responses to happy faces,EurJNeurosci,
23 (2006), 1944–1948.
[12] I. Chavarr´
ıa-Siles, J. Contreras-Rojas, E. Hare, C. Walss-Bass,
P. Quezada, A. Dassori, et al., Cannabinoid receptor 1 gene
(CNR1) and susceptibility to a quantitative phenotype for
hebephrenic schizophrenia, Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr
Genet, 147 (2008), 279–284.
[13]X.Chen,V.S.Williamson,S.S.An,J.M.Hettema,S.H.
Aggen, M. C. Neale, et al., Cannabinoid receptor 1 gene
association with nicotine dependence, Arch Gen Psychiatry, 65
(2008), 816–824.
[14] D. E. Comings, Genetic factors in drug abuse and dependence,
NIDA Res Monogr, 159 (1996), 16–38.
[15] D. F. Conrad, D. Pinto, R. Redon, L. Feuk, O. Gokcumen,
Y. Zhang, et al., Origins and functional impact of copy number
variation in the human genome, Nature, 464 (2010), 704–712.
[16] R. P. Corley, J. S. Zeiger, T. Crowley, M. A. Ehringer, J. K.
Hewitt, C. J. Hopfer, et al., Association of candidate genes
with antisocial drug dependence in adolescents, Drug Alcohol
Depend, 96 (2008), 90–98.
[17] D. Cota, G. Marsicano, B. Lutz, V. Vicennati, G. K. Stalla,
R. Pasquali, et al., Endogenous cannabinoid system as a
modulator of food intake, Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord, 27
(2003), 289–301.
[18] I. R. Dinu, S. Popa, M. Bˆ
ıcu, E. Mota, and M. Mota, The
implication of CNR1 gene’s polymorphisms in the modulation of
endocannabinoid system effects, Rom J Intern Med, 47 (2009),
9–18.
[19] K. Domschke, U. Dannlowski, P. Ohrmann, B. Lawford,
J. Bauer, H. Kugel, et al., Cannabinoid receptor 1 (CNR1)
gene: impact on antidepressant treatment response and emotion
processing in major depression, Eur Neuropsychopharmacol,
18 (2008), 751–759.
[20] C.L.Ehlers,W.S.Slutske,P.A.Lind,andK.C.Wilhelmsen,
Association between single nucleotide polymorphisms in the
cannabinoid receptor gene (CNR1) and impulsivity in southwest
California Indians, Twin Res Hum Genet, 10 (2007), 805–811.
[21] F. M. Filbey, J. P. Schacht, U. S. Myers, R. S. Chavez,
and K. E. Hutchison, Individual and additive effects of the
CNR1 and FAAH genes on brain response to marijuana cues,
Neuropsychopharmacology, 35 (2010), 967–975.
[22] D. Gadzicki, K. M¨
uller-Vahl, and M. Stuhrmann, A frequent
polymorphism in the coding exon of the human cannabinoid
receptor (CNR1) gene, Mol Cell Probes, 13 (1999), 321–323.
[23] D. Gadzicki, K. R. M¨
uller-Vahl, D. Heller, S. Ossege, M. M.
N¨
othen, J. Hebebrand, et al., Tourette syndrome is not caused
by mutations in the central cannabinoid receptor (CNR1) gene,
Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet, 127 (2004), 97–103.
[24] P. Gazzerro, M. Caruso, M. Notarnicola, G. Misciagna,
V. Guerra, C. Laezza, et al., Association between cannabinoid
type-1 receptor polymorphism and body mass index in a south-
ern Italian population, Int J Obes (Lond), 31 (2007), 908–912.
[25] C. C. Gerhardt and H. van Heerikhuizen, Functional char-
acteristics of heterologously expressed 5-HT receptors,EurJ
Pharmacol, 334 (1997), 1–23.
Journal of the International Drug Abuse Research Society 9
[26] W. Gonsiorek, C. Lunn, X. Fan, S. Narula, D. Lundell, and
R. Hipkin, Endocannabinoid 2-arachidonyl glycerol is a full
agonist through human type 2 cannabinoid receptor: antago-
nism by anandamide, Mol Pharmacol, 57 (2000), 1045–1050.
[27] N. Hamdani, J. P. Tabeze, N. Ramoz, J. Ades, M. Hamon,
Y. Sarfati, et al., The CNR1 gene as a pharmacogenetic
factor for antipsychotics rather than a susceptibility gene for
schizophrenia, Eur Neuropsychopharmacol, 18 (2008), 34–40.
[28] D. Heller, U. Schneider, J. Seifert, K. F. Cimander, and
M. Stuhrmann, The cannabinoid receptor gene (CNR1) is not
affected in German i.v. drug users, Addict Biol, 6 (2001), 183–
187.
[29] C. M. Henstridge, N. A. Balenga, L. A. Ford, R. A. Ross,
M. Waldhoer, and A. J. Irving, The GPR55 ligand L-α-
lysophosphatidylinositol promotes RhoA-dependent Ca2+ sig-
naling and NFAT activation, FASEB J, 23 (2009), 183–193.
[30] A. Herman, H. Kranzler, J. Cubells, J. Gelernter, and J. Covault,
Association study of the CNR1 gene exon 3 alternative promoter
region polymorphisms and substance dependence,AmJMed
Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet, 141 (2006), 499–503.
[31] C. J. Hillard, K. M. Weinlander, and K. L. Stuhr, Contributions
of endocannabinoid signaling to psychiatric disorders in
humans: genetic and biochemical evidence, Neuroscience, 204
(2012), 207–229.
[32] J. Hoenicka, G. Ponce, M. A. Jim´
enez-Arriero, I. Ampuero,
R. Rodr´
ıguez-Jim´
enez, G. Rubio, et al., Association in alcoholic
patients between psychopathic traits and the additive effect of
allelic forms of the CNR1 and FAAH endocannabinoid genes,
and the 3’ region of the DRD2 gene, Neurotox Res, 11 (2007),
51–60.
[33] C. J. Hopfer, J. M. Lessem, C. A. Hartman, M. C. Stallings,
S. S. Cherny, R. P. Corley, et al., A genome-wide scan for
loci influencing adolescent cannabis dependence symptoms:
evidence for linkage on chromosomes 3 and 9, Drug Alcohol
Depend, 89 (2007), 34–41.
[34] C. J. Hopfer, M. C. Stallings, J. K. Hewitt, and T. J. Crowley,
Family transmission of marijuana use, abuse, and dependence,
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 42 (2003), 834–841.
[35] C. J. Hopfer, S. E. Young, S. Purcell, T. J. Crowley, M. C.
Stallings,R.P.Corley,etal.,Cannabis receptor haplotype
associated with fewer cannabis dependence symptoms in
adolescents, Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet, 141
(2006), 895–901.
[36] G. Horev, J. Ellegood, J. P. Lerch, Y. E. Son, L. Muthuswamy,
H. Vogel, et al., Dosage-dependent phenotypes in models of
16p11.2 lesions found in autism, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
108 (2011), 17076–17081.
[37] K. E. Hutchison, H. Haughey, M. Niculescu, J. Schacht,
A. Kaiser, J. Stitzel, et al., The incentive salience of alcohol:
translating the effects of genetic variant in CNR1,ArchGen
Psychiatry, 65 (2008), 841–850.
[38] H. Ishiguro, O. Carpio, Y. Horiuchi, A. Shu, S. Higuchi,
N. Schanz, et al., A nonsynonymous polymorphism in cannabi-
noid CB2 receptor gene is associated with eating disorders
in humans and food intake is modified in mice by its ligands,
Synapse, 64 (2010), 92–96.
[39] H. Ishiguro, Y. Horiuchi, M. Ishikawa, M. Koga, K. Imai,
Y. Suzuki, et al., Brain cannabinoid CB2 receptor in schizophre-
nia, Biol Psychiatry, 67 (2010), 974–982.
[40] H. Ishiguro, S. Iwasaki, L. Teasenfitz, S. Higuchi, Y. Horiuchi,
T. Saito, et al., Involvement of cannabinoid CB2 receptor
in alcohol preference in mice and alcoholism in humans,
Pharmacogenomics J, 7 (2007), 380–385.
[41] S. Iwasaki, H. Ishiguro, S. Higuchi, E. S. Onaivi, and
T. Ar inam i, Association study between alcoholism and
endocannabinoid metabolic enzyme genes encoding fatty acid
amide hydrolase and monoglyceride lipase in a Japanese
population, Psychiatr Genet, 17 (2007), 215–220.
[42] J. P. Jaeger, V. S. Mattevi, S. M. Callegari-Jacques, and
M. H. Hutz, Cannabinoid type-1 receptor gene polymorphisms
are associated with central obesity in a Southern Brazilian
population, Dis Markers, 25 (2008), 67–74.
[43] D. Jesudason and G. Wittert, Endocannabinoid system in food
intake and metabolic regulation, Curr Opin Lipidol, 19 (2008),
344–348.
[44] A. C. Johansson and L. Feuk, Characterization of copy number-
stable regions in the human genome, Hum Mutat, 32 (2011),
947–955.
[45] J. P. Johnson, D. Muhleman, J. MacMurray, R. Gade, R. Verde,
M. Ask, et al., Association between the cannabinoid receptor
gene (CNR1) and the P300 event-related potential, Mol
Psychiatry, 2 (1997), 169–171.
[46] T. Kaname, A commentary on implication of gene copy number
variation in health and diseases, J Hum Genet, 57 (2012), 79–
80.
[47] M. Karsak, M. Cohen-Solal, J. Freudenberg, A. Ostertag,
C. Morieux, U. Kornak, et al., Cannabinoid receptor type 2
gene is associated with human osteoporosis, Hum Mol Genet,
14 (2005), 3389–3396.
[48] E. Klopocki and S. Mundlos, Copy-number variations, noncod-
ing sequences, and human phenotypes, Annu Rev Genomics
Hum Genet, 12 (2011), 53–72.
[49] J. E. Lauckner, J. B. Jensen, H. Y. Chen, H. C. Lu, B. Hille,
and K. Mackie, GPR55 is a cannabinoid receptor that increases
intracellular calcium and inhibits M current, Proc Natl Acad Sci
U S A, 105 (2008), 2699–2704.
[50] C. Lee and S. W. Scherer, The clinical context of copy number
variation in the human genome, Expert Rev Mol Med, 12
(2010), e8.
[51] S. Leroy, N. Griffon, M. C. Bourdel, J. P. Oli´
e, M. F. Poirier, and
M. O. Krebs, Schizophrenia and the cannabinoid receptor type
1 (CB1): association study using a single-base polymorphism in
coding exon 1, Am J Med Genet, 105 (2001), 749–752.
[52] T.Li,X.Liu,Z.H.Zhu,J.Zhao,X.Hu,D.M.Ball,etal.,No
association between (AAT)nrepeats in the cannabinoid recep-
tor gene (CNR1) and heroin abuse in a Chinese population, Mol
Psychiatry, 5 (2000), 128–130.
[53] P. Lin, S. M. Hartz, J. C. Wang, A. Agrawal, T. X. Zhang,
N. McKenna, et al., Copy number variations in 6q14.1 and
5q13.2 are associated with alcohol dependence, Alcohol Clin
Exp Res, 2012 (36), 1512–1518.
[54] Q. R. Liu, C. H. Pan, A. Hishimoto, C. Y. Li, Z. X. Xi,
A. Llorente-Berzal, et al., Species differences in cannabinoid
receptor 2 (CNR2 gene): identification of novel human and
rodent CB2 isoforms, differential tissue expression and regu-
lation by cannabinoid receptor ligands, Genes Brain Behav, 8
(2009), 519–530.
[55] J. A. L´
opez-Moreno, V. Echeverry-Alzate, and K. M. B¨
uhler,
The genetic basis of the endocannabinoid system and drug
addiction in humans, J Psychopharmacol, 26 (2012), 133–143.
[56] A. T. Lu, M. N. Ogdie, M. R. J¨
arvelin, I. K. Moilanen, S. K. Loo,
J. T. McCracken, et al., Association of the cannabinoid receptor
gene (CNR1) with ADHD and post-traumatic stress disorder,
Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet, 147B (2008), 1488–
1494.
[57] I. Mart´
ınez-Gras, J. Hoenicka, G. Ponce, R. Rodr´
ıguez-Jim´
enez,
M. A. Jim´
enez-Arriero, E. P´
erez-Hernandez, et al., (AAT)n
repeat in the cannabinoid receptor gene, CNR1: association
with schizophrenia in a Spanish population, Eur Arch Psychi-
atry Clin Neurosci, 256 (2006), 437–441.
[58] D. Minocci, J. Massei, A. Martino, M. Milianti, L. Piz,
D. Di Bello, et al., Genetic association between bipolar disorder
10 Journal of Drug and Alcohol Research
and 524A >C (Leu133Ile) polymorphism of CNR2 gene,
encoding for CB2 cannabinoid receptor, J Affect Disord, 134
(2011), 427–430.
[59] T. D. M¨
uller, K. Reichwald, G. Br¨
onner, J. Kirschner, T. T.
Nguyen, A. Scherag, et al., Lack of association of genetic
variants in genes of the endocannabinoid system with anorexia
nervosa, Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health, 2 (2008), 33.
[60] T. D. M¨
uller, K. Reichwald, A. K. Wermter, G. Br¨
onner, T. T.
Nguyen, S. Friedel, et al., No evidence for an involvement of
variants in the cannabinoid receptor gene (CNR1) in obesity in
German children and adolescents, Mol Genet Metab, 90 (2007),
429–434.
[61] W. J. Murphy, E. Eizirik, W. E. Johnson, Y. P. Zhang, O. A.
Ryder, and S. J. O’Brien, Molecular phylogenetics and the
origins of placental mammals, Nature, 409 (2001), 614–814.
[62] J. Nomura and T. Takumi, Animal models of psychiatric
disorders that reflect human copy number variation,Neural
Plast, 2012 (2012), 589524.
[63] R. Nordstr¨
om and H. Andersson, Amino-terminal processing of
the human cannabinoid receptor 1, J Recept Signal Transduct
Res, 26 (2006), 259–267.
[64] E. N´
u˜
nez, C. Benito, M. R. Pazos, A. Barbachano, O. Fajardo,
S. Gonz´
alez, et al., Cannabinoid CB2 receptors are expressed
by perivascular microglial cells in the human brain: An
immunohistochemical study, Synapse, 53 (2004), 208–213.
[65] S. Oka, K. Nakajima, A. Yamashita, S. Kishimoto, and T. Sug-
iura, Identification of GPR55 as a lysophosphatidylinositol re-
ceptor, Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 362 (2007), 928–934.
[66] E. S. Onaivi, Neuropsychobiological evidence for the functional
presence and expression of cannabinoid CB2 receptors in the
brain, Neuropsychobiology, 54 (2006), 231–246.
[67] E. S. Onaivi, Endocannabinoid system, pharmacogenomics and
response to therapy, Pharmacogenomics, 11 (2010), 907–910.
[68] E. S. Onaivi, Commentary: Functional neuronal CB2 cannabi-
noid receptors in the CNS, Curr Neuropharmacol, 9 (2011),
205–208.
[69] E. S. Onaivi, G. Chaudhuri, A. S. Abaci, M. Parker, D. H.
Manier, P. R. Martin, et al., Expression of cannabinoid
receptors and their gene transcripts in human blood cells,Prog
Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry, 23 (1999), 1063–1077.
[70] E. S. Onaivi, H. Ishiguro, J. Gong, S. Patel, P. Meozzi, L. Myers,
et al., Functional expression of brain neuronal CB2 cannabinoid
receptors are involved in the effects of drugs of abuse and in
depression, Ann N Y Acad Sci, 1139 (2008), 434–449.
[71] E. S. Onaivi, H. Ishiguro, J. Gong, S. Patel, A. Perchuk,
P. Meozzi, et al., Discovery of the presence and functional
expression of cannabinoid CB2 receptors in brain,AnnNY
Acad Sci, 1074 (2006), 514–536.
[72] E. S. Onaivi, H. Ishiguro, J. P. Gong, S. Patel, P. A. Meozzi,
L. Myers, et al., Brain neuronal CB2 cannabinoid receptors in
drug abuse and depression: from mice to human subjects,PLoS
One, 3 (2008), e1640.
[73] E. S. Onaivi, H. Ishiguro, S. Gu, and Q. R. Liu, CNS
effects of CB2 cannabinoid receptors: beyond neuro-immuno-
cannabinoid activity, J Psychopharmacol, 26 (2012), 92–103.
[74] E. S. Onaivi, T. Sugiura, and V. Di Marzo, eds., Endocannabi-
noids: The Brain and Body’s Marijuana and Beyond, CRC
Press, Boca Raton, 2006.
[75] T. Palomo, R. Kostrzewa, R. Beninger, and T. Archer, Genetic
variation and shared biological susceptibility underlying co-
morbidity in neuropsychiatry, Neurotox Res, 12 (2007), 29–42.
[76] M. R. Pazos, E. N´
u˜
nez, C. Benito, R. M. Tol´
on, and J. Romero,
Role of the endocannabinoid system in Alzheimer’s disease: new
perspectives, Life Sci, 75 (2004), 1907–1915.
[77] A. Peeters, S. Beckers, I. Mertens, W. Van Hul, and L. Van Gaal,
The G1422A variant of the cannabinoid receptor gene
(CNR1) is associated with abdominal adiposity in obese men,
Endocrine, 31 (2007), 138–141.
[78] F. Petitet, M. Donlan, and A. Michel, GPR55 as a new
cannabinoid receptor: still a long way to prove it,ChemBiol
Drug Des, 67 (2006), 252–253.
[79] G. Ponce, J. Hoenicka, G. Rubio, I. Ampuero, M. A. Jim´
enez-
Arriero, R. Rodr´
ıguez-Jim´
enez, et al., Association between
cannabinoid receptor gene (CNR1) and childhood atten-
tion deficit/hyperactivity disorder in Spanish male alcoholic
patients, Mol Psychiatry, 8 (2003), 466–467.
[80] U. W. Preuss, G. Koller, P. Zill, B. Bondy, and M. Soyka,
Alcoholism-related phenotypes and genetic variants of the CB1
receptor, Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci, 253 (2003), 275–
280.
[81] D. Proudnikov, T. Kroslak, J. C. Sipe, M. Randesi, D. Li,
S. Hamon, et al., Association of polymorphisms of the cannabi-
noid receptor (CNR1) and fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH)
genes with heroin addiction: impact of long repeats of CNR1,
Pharmacogenomics J, 10 (2010), 232–242.
[82] W. Reinhard, K. Stark, K. Neureuther, K. Sedlacek, M. Fischer,
A. Baessler, et al., Common polymorphisms in the cannabinoid
CB2 receptor gene (CNR2) are not associated with myocardial
infarction and cardiovascular risk factors, Int J Mol Med, 22
(2008), 165–174.
[83] P. Russo, P. Strazzullo, F. Cappuccio, D. Tregouet, F. Lauria,
M. Loguercio, et al., Genetic variations at the endocannabinoid
type 1 receptor gene (CNR1) are associated with obesity pheno-
types in men, J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 92 (2007), 2382–2386.
[84] L. Schmidt, J. Samochowiec, U. Finckh, E. Fiszer-Piosik,
J. Horodnicki, B. Wendel, et al., Association of a CB1 cannabi-
noid receptor gene (CNR1) polymorphism with severe alcohol
dependence, Drug Alcohol Depend, 65 (2002), 221–224.
[85] G. Serra and W. Fratta, A possible role for the endocannabinoid
system in the neurobiology of depression, Clin Pract Epidemiol
Ment Health, 3 (2007), 25.
[86] Z. Siegfried, K. Kanyas, Y. Latzer, O. Karni, M. Bloch,
B. Lerer, et al., Association study of cannabinoid receptor
gene (CNR1) alleles and anorexia nervosa: differences between
restricting and binging/purging subtypes,AmJMedGenetB
Neuropsychiatr Genet, 125 (2004), 126–130.
[87] J. C. Sipe, N. Arbour, A. Gerber, and E. Beutler, Reduced
endocannabinoid immune modulation by a common cannabi-
noid 2 (CB2) receptor gene polymorphism: possible risk for
autoimmune disorders, J Leukoc Biol, 78 (2005), 231–238.
[88] D. St Clair, Structural and copy number variants in the human
genome: implications for psychiatry, Br J Psychiatry, 202
(2013), 5–6.
[89] P. Stankiewicz and J. R. Lupski, Structural variation in the
human genome and its role in disease,AnnuRevMed,61
(2010), 437–455.
[90] T. Sugiura, S. Kishimoto, S. Oka, and M. Gokoh, Biochemistry,
pharmacology and physiology of 2-arachidonoylglycerol, an
endogenous cannabinoid receptor ligand, Prog Lipid Res, 45
(2006), 405–446.
[91] T. Sugiura, T. Kodaka, S. Nakane, T. Miyashita, S. Kondo,
Y. Suhara, et al., Evidence that the cannabinoid CB1 receptor
is a 2-arachidonoylglycerol receptor. Structure-activity rela-
tionship of 2-arachidonoylglycerol, ether-linked analogues, and
related compounds, J Biol Chem, 274 (1999), 2794–2801.
[92] S. J. Tsai, Y. C. Wang, and C. J. Hong, Association study
of a cannabinoid receptor gene (CNR1) polymorphism and
schizophrenia, Psychiatr Genet, 10 (2000), 149–151.
[93] S. J. Tsai, Y. C. Wang, and C. J. Hong, Association study
between cannabinoid receptor gene (CNR1) and pathogenesis
and psychotic symptoms of mood disorders,AmJMedGenet,
105 (2001), 219–221.
Journal of the International Drug Abuse Research Society 11
[94] R. F. Tyndale, Genetics of alcohol and tobacco use in humans,
Ann Med, 35 (2003), 94–121.
[95] H. Ujike, M. Takaki, K. Nakata, Y. Tanaka, T. Takeda,
M. Kodama, et al., CNR1, central cannabinoid receptor gene,
associated with susceptibility to hebephrenic schizophrenia,
Mol Psychiatry, 7 (2002), 515–518.
[96] A. Valsesia, A. Mac´
e, S. Jacquemont, J. S. Beckmann, and
Z. Kutalik, The growing importance of CNVs: new insights for
detection and clinical interpretation, Front Genet, 4 (2013), 92.
[97] I. Vasileiou, G. Fotopoulou, M. Matzourani, E. Patsouris, and
S. Theocharis, Evidence for the involvement of cannabinoid
receptors’ polymorphisms in the pathophysiology of human
diseases, Expert Opin Ther Targets, 17 (2013), 363–377.
[98] L. V. Wain, J. A. Armour, and M. D. Tobin, Genomic copy
number variation, human health, and disease, Lancet, 374
(2009), 340–350.
[99] J. Woolmore, M. Stone, S. Holley, P. Jenkinson, A. Ike, P. Jones,
et al., Polymorphisms of the cannabinoid 1 receptor gene
and cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis, Mult Scler, 14
(2008), 177–182.
[100] Y. Yamada, F. Ando, and H. Shimokata, Association of
candidate gene polymorphisms with bone mineral density in
community-dwelling Japanese women and men, Int J Mol Med,
19 (2007), 791–801.
[101] F. Zhang, W. Gu, M. E. Hurles, and J. R. Lupski, Copy number
variation in human health, disease, and evolution, Annu Rev
Genomics Hum Genet, 10 (2009), 451–481.
[102] P. W. Zhang, H. Ishiguro, T. Ohtsuki, J. Hess, F. Carillo,
D. Walther, et al., Human cannabinoid receptor 1:5exons,
candidate regulatory regions, polymorphisms, haplotypes and
association with polysubstance abuse, Mol Psychiatry, 9 (2004),
916–931.
[103] L. Zuo, H. R. Kranzler, X. Luo, B. Z. Yang, R. Weiss, K. Brady,
et al., Interaction between two independent CNR1 variants
increases risk for cocaine dependence in European Americans:
a replication study in family-based sample and population-
based sample, Neuropsychopharmacology, 34 (2009), 1504–
1513.
... The drawback from some previous studies has been the unsuccessful attempts by some groups to generate mice with selective deletion of CB2Rs from neurons and the generation of CB2R-GFP and CB2R-EGFP with peripheral CB2R promoterdriven transgenic reporter mouse line or other flaws in designs that detected microglial but not neuronal expression of CB2Rs (Ghose 2009;Lopez et al. 2018;Schmöle et al. 2015). Indeed, our studies provided the first evidence for neuronal CNS effects of CB2Rs, and its possible role in drug addiction, eating disorders, psychosis, depression, and autism spectrum disorders (ASDs), (Onaivi et al. 2006a;Onaivi et al. 2015;Onaivi et al. 2013;Onaivi et al. 2008;Ishiguro et al. 2007;Ishiguro et al. 2010a;Ishiguro et al. 2010b;Onaivi et al. 2011). Cell type-specific mechanisms of CB2Rs are unclear because the existing CB2R gene knockout mice are constitutive gene knock, with partial/incomplete deletion of CB2Rs, and are not suitable for tissue-and cell type-specific studies at molecular, pharmacological, and behavioral levels. ...
... Associated with a protective effect against lifetime MDD a The above includes gene polymorphisms catalog indicating inconsistencies in variation of the ECB system CB1R and CB2R genes in some neuropsychiatric disturbances. Further studies with more number of participants from different ethnic backgrounds are required, with consideration of epigenetic and exposomic factors (Onaivi et al. 2013) which shows an antidepressant effect. A CB1R agonist, ACPA, and an antagonist, AM251, were also used. ...
... The link with the ECS might partially explain the mechanism behind ketamine's antidepressive effects. Upon activation of the CBRs along with the retrograde signaling associated with the modulation of other neurotransmitters, the hypothalamic-pituitaryadrenal axis is associated with providing therapeutic benefits (Onaivi et al. 2015;Onaivi et al. 2013). This is the bases for the modulation of the ECS as therapeutic targets, or as adjunctive treatment in generalized depression. ...
Chapter
The Cannabis sativa plant has been used medicinally and recreationally for thousands of years, but recently only relatively some of its constituents have been identified. There are more than 550 chemical compounds in cannabis, with more than 100 phytocannabinoids being identified, including Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD). These phytocannabinoids work by binding to the cannabinoid receptors, as well as other receptor systems. Also within cannabis are the aromatic terpenes, more than 100 of which have been identified. Cannabis and its constituents have been indicated as therapeutic compounds in numerous medical conditions, such as pain, anxiety, epilepsy, nausea and vomiting, and post-traumatic stress disorder. This chapter provides an overview of some of the biological effects of a number of the cannabinoids and terpenes, as well as discussing their known mechanisms of action and evidence of potential therapeutic effects.
... The mouse (23 kb) and rat (20 kb) CB2 receptor genes are almost four times shorter than the human CB2 receptor gene (90 kb). The mouse CB2 receptor gene is transcribed into two mRNAs from three exons, whereas the rat CB2 receptor gene can be spliced into four mRNAs from three exons (Cording & Bateup, 2023;Onaivi et al., 2013). Compared to human CB2 receptors, the amino acid sequence homology is lower between human and mouse CB2 receptors (82%) than between human and rat CB2 receptors (93%). ...
... Further studies in the Japanese population showed that Q63R polymorphism of the CNR2 gene is linked with alcoholism (Ishiguro et al., 2007) and depression (Onaivi et al., 2013). CNR2 gene expression in peripheral immune cells prevents inflammation and neuronal damage and exerts specific changes in the central nervous system. ...
Article
Full-text available
The salient features of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) encompass persistent difficulties in social communication, as well as the presence of restricted and repetitive facets of behavior, hobbies, or pursuits, which are often accompanied with cognitive limitations. Over the past few decades, a sizable number of studies have been conducted to enhance our understanding of the pathophysiology of ASD. Preclinical rat models have proven to be extremely valuable in simulating and analyzing the roles of a wide range of established environmental and genetic factors. Recent research has also demonstrated the significant involvement of the endocannabinoid system (ECS) in the pathogenesis of several neuropsychiatric diseases, including ASD. In fact, the ECS has the potential to regulate a multitude of metabolic and cellular pathways associated with autism, including the immune system. Moreover, the ECS has emerged as a promising target for intervention with high predictive validity. Particularly noteworthy are resent preclinical studies in rodents, which describe the onset of ASD-like symptoms after various genetic or pharmacological interventions targeting the ECS, providing encouraging evidence for further exploration in this area.
... The CBRs include CB1R and CB2R, belonging to the G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) family [19]. CB1R in humans is encoded by the CNR1 gene located on chromosome 6q15, which has three isoforms [20]. Several studies using quantitative autoradiography, in situ hybridization, and immunocytochemistry have revealed an extensive expression of CB1R in mammals' brains [21]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose of Review It is well established that learning and memory are central to substance dependence. Convincing basic and clinical documents indicate a crucial involvement of the endocannabinoid system (ECS) in the processing of opioid-associated memory. Despite the considerable progress in treating opioid addiction, current pharmacological strategies are limited. For decades, pharmacologists have sought effective treatments for drug addiction with a focus on various molecular targets are possibly implicated in the various phases of opioid memory. With a substantial gain in understanding the action of the ECS in reward processing and the development of addiction, this review focuses on recent research, placing a primary emphasis on publications that evaluate the roles of the ECS in various phases of opioid memory, including consolidation, extinction, and reconsolidation. Recent Findings According to current documents (mentioned in the tables), cannabinoid receptor type 1 antagonists and cannabinoid receptor type 2 agonists commonly demonstrate the ability to suppress opioid memory. However, the effects of each drug are influenced by three factors: type, dose, and route of administration. Moreover, certain drugs may produce varied effects when used in different paradigms. Summary This review summarizes the therapeutic potential of some ECS-based medications in addiction. However, it underscores the critical need for a substantial number of studies, particularly clinical trials focused on opioid addiction.
... The complexity of substance use disorder make genetic prediction efforts difficult, and while currently only alcohol use disorder have been genetically correlated with CUD, continued advancements in molecular genetic studies and substance use disorder at larges further our understanding of the biological pathways underlying substance use disorders [9,63,65]. For instance, CNR1 and CNR2, components of the endocannabinoid system, are major targets of investigation for their impact in neuropsychiatry and addiction phenotypes suggested shared genetic risk factors [66,67]. In regards to neuropsychiatric disorders, Mendelian randomization studies have found mixed evidence on the causal effect of cannabis initiation and schizophrenia, finding weak evidence that cannabis initiation increases schizophrenia risk and strong evidence that schizophrenia liability increases the odds of cannabis initiation, and causal evidence of ADHD on cannabis initiation [68][69][70][71][72]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background With the increase in cannabis use rates, cannabis use disorder is being reported as one of the most common drug use disorders globally. Cannabis use has several known physical, psychological, and social adverse events, such as altered judgement, poor educational outcomes, and respiratory symptoms. The propensity for taking cannabis and the development of a cannabis use disorder may be genetically influenced for some individuals. Heritability estimates suggest a genetic basis for cannabis use, and several genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have identified possible regions of association, albeit with inconsistent findings. This systematic review aims to summarize the findings from GWASs investigating cannabis use and cannabis use disorder. Methods This systematic review incorporates articles that have performed a GWAS investigating cannabis use or cannabis use disorder. MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, CINAHL, GWAS Catalog, GWAS Central, and NIH Database of Genotype and Phenotype were searched using a comprehensive search strategy. All studies were screened in duplicate, and the quality of evidence was assessed using the quality of genetic association studies (Q-Genie) tool. All studies underwent qualitative synthesis; however, quantitative analysis was not feasible. Results Our search identified 5984 articles. Six studies met our eligibility criteria and were included in this review. All six studies reported results that met our significance threshold of p ≤ 1.0 × 10 –7 . In total 96 genetic variants were identified. While meta-analysis was not possible, this review identified the following genes, ANKFN1 , INTS7 , PI4K2B , CSMD1 , CST7 , ACSS1 , and SCN9A , to be associated with cannabis use. These regions were previously reported in different mental health conditions, however not in relation to cannabis use. Conclusion This systematic review summarized GWAS findings within the field of cannabis research. While a meta-analysis was not possible, the summary of findings serves to inform future candidate gene studies and replication efforts. Systematic Review Registration PROSPERO CRD42020176016.
... 15 In their review article, Onaivi et al. reported that neuropsychiatric disorders are related to variants of the CNR2 gene and investigated the increased risk of schizophrenia, depression, eating and autism spectrum disorders, and drug addiction in low CNR2 function. 16 UCP2 plays a role in central regulation of autonomic, endocrine, and metabolic systems and mediates mood, cognition, and behavior. Many studies have demonstrated neuroprotective effects of UCP2. ...
Article
Full-text available
Synthetic cannabinoids (SC) are psychoactive drugs that generally produce more severe clinical outcomes compared to Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between clinical features of synthetic cannabinoid use disorder (SCUD) and COMT (rs4680), CNR2 (rs2501432), CNR2 (rs2229579), UCP2 (rs659366), and IL-17 (rs763780) gene variants in SCUD patients by comparing the genotype distributions of gene variants between patients and healthy controls. Based on the DSM-5 criteria, 94 patients with SCUD, confirmed with a positive urine test, and 95 healthy volunteers were included in the study. Self-mutilation, suicidal behavior, psychotic symptoms, drug-induced psychosis, tobacco use disorder (TUD) or alcohol use disorder (AUD) comorbidity, and family history of TUD or AUD were evaluated in all patients. PCR-RFLP was used to identify gene variants from DNA material. The distributions of CNR2 (rs2229579) and UCP2 (rs659366) variants were significantly different in patients diagnosed with SCUD compared to the control group. SC-related psychotic symptoms were associated with the IL-17 (rs763780) variant in SCUD patients who had an onset of SC usage under 18 years of age. While the COMT Val108Met gene variant was related to self-mutilation, the COMT Val158Met variant was associated with attempted suicide. In addition, in SCUD patients, the UCP2 (rs659366) variant was associated with a family history of AUD or TUD. In summary, CNR2 (rs2229579) and UCP2 (rs659366) variants were associated with SCUD. While SC-related psychotic symptoms were related to the IL-17 (rs763780) variant, the COMT variants were associated with self-mutilation or attempted suicide in SCUD patients.
... Deletion of CB2R induced long-term memory deficit and schizophrenia- like behaviours in mice ( Li and Kim, 2016;Ortega-Alvaro et al., 2011). There are also genetic associations between polymorphism of CNR2 gene (encoding for CB2R) and neuropsychiatric disorders with in- creased risk of autism spectrum disorders, bipolar disorders, depression, drug abuse, schizophrenia (Ishiguro et al., 2010;Minocci et al., 2011;Onaivi et al., 2013). Therefore, it is important for further studies to investigate the effects of APDs on CB2R using selective CB2R ligands such as HU910, HU308 or JWH133 ( Soethoudt et al., 2017). ...
Article
Antipsychotic drugs have been increasingly prescribed to children and adolescents for treating various mental disorders, such as childhood-onset schizophrenia. The abnormality of endocannabinoid system is involved in the pathophysiology of these disorders in juveniles. This study investigated the effect of antipsychotics on the cannabinoid (CB) receptors in the brain of both male and female juvenile rats. The postnatal rats (PD23±1) were administered aripiprazole (1 mg/kg), olanzapine (1 mg/kg), risperidone (0.3 mg/kg) or vehicle (control) for 3 weeks. Quantitative autoradiography was used to investigate the binding densities of [3H]CP-55940 (an agonist for CB1R and CB2R) and [3H]SR141716A (a selective CB1R antagonist) in the rat brains. Risperidone significantly upregulated the [3H]CP55940 and [3H]SR141716A bindings in the prefrontal cortex (PFC), nucleus accumbens core (NAcC), nucleus accumbens shell (NAcS), cingulate cortex (Cg), and the caudate putamen (CPu) in male rats. Moreover, aripiprazole significantly elevated the [3H]SR141716A binding in the Cg and NAcS of female rats. Furthermore, there is an overall higher [3H]SR141716A binding level in the brain of female rats than male rats. Therefore, treatment with aripiprazole, olanzapine and risperidone could induce differential and gender specific effects on the binding density of cannabinoid receptors in the selected brain regions of childhood/adolescent rats.
... Thus, emerging evidence indicates that the ECS exerts a powerful modulatory action on retrograde signaling associated with inhibition of synaptic transmission (Lovinger, 2008). Interestingly, a role for variations in the CNR1 gene has also been associated with striatal responses to happy but not disgusted faces (Chakrabarti et al., 2006) with the implication that functional variation of CNR1 genotypes may be associated with disturbances of the brain involving emotional and social stimuli, such as autism (Chakrabarti et al., 2006) and depression (Domschke et al., 2008;Onaivi et al., 2013). Additional data from our group focus on these recent advances in cannabinoid genomics and the surprising new fundamental roles that the ECS plays in the genetic basis of marijuana use and cannabinoid pharmacotherapeutics. ...
Article
Part of the conclusions provided here on the therapeutic potential of cannabinoid CB 2 receptor (CB2R) ligands is based on previous work and reviews by our group and others, on the emerging molecular features of the elements of the endocannabinoid system (ECS), and particularly on CB1Rs and CB2Rs and their therapeutic potential. The role of CB1Rs and CB2Rs and their interactions with one another cannot be ignored. The proposed therapeutic implications of targeting elements of the ECS for the treatment of neurological and mental illness may involve interaction between the CB2R and the CB1R, which remains one of the most abundant G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) in the brain. Therefore, significant advances with discoveries unra-veling such a compelling puzzle and major breakthroughs in revealing the elements of the ECS can be described as paradigmatic (Onaivi, 2002). The discovery that specific genes code for cannabinoid receptors (CBRs) that are activated by marijuana use and endocannabinoids (eCBs) (Onaivi et al., 2006c), has provided surprising new knowledge about cannabinoid genomic and proteomic profiles as potential therapeutic targets. These remarkable progressions, new understanding, and advances indicate that the molecular, cellular, biochemical, and behavioral responses to marijuana, which remains one of the most widely used and abused drugs in the world, are coded in our genes and chromosomes. This increasing new knowledge from the decoding of the 425 L. Fattore (Ed): Cannabinoids in Neurologic and Mental Disease.
Article
With the increasing global use of medical and adult recreational use of cannabis and cannabinoids, this chapter provides overview of evidence from animal and human studies on psychiatric disorders and cannabinoid receptors. We review and present evaluation of the relationship between changes in the ECS and psychiatric disorders. Evidence suggests the existence of a relationship between changes in components of the ECS, and some of the symptoms present in psychiatric disorders. Both CB1Rs and CB2Rs are components of the endocannabinoid system with different cellular and tissue localization patterns that are differentially expressed in the CNS and PNS and are emerging targets for the treatment of number psychiatric disorders. As cannabis preparations are widely used for recreation globally, it is predictable that cannabis use disorders (CUDs) will increase and there is currently no available treatment for CUDs. Although major advances have been reported from cannabinoid and ECS research, there are gaps in scientific knowledge on long-term consequences of cannabis use. Adolescent and cannabis use during pregnancy presents further challenges, and more research will uncover the signaling pathways that couple the gut microbiota with the host ECS. Development of cannabis and cannabinoid nanomedicine for nanotherapy will certainly overcome some of the shortcomings and challenges in medicinal and recreational use of cannabis and cannabinoids. Thus, nanotechnology will allow targeted delivery of cannabinoid formulations with the potential to elevate their use to scientifically validated nanotherapeutic applications as the field of cannabis nanoscience matures.
Chapter
Cannabinoids and many other compounds are constituents in Cannabis sativa L., (cannabaceae) and endocannabinoids (eCBs) are the endogenous marijuana-like substances found in animals and humans. Endocannabinoids, phytocannabinoids and marijuana use activate two cannabinoid receptors (CBRs), CB1Rs and CB2Rs that are encoded in human chromosomes 6 and 1 respectively. New understanding in the science of cannabis botany along with medical and biotechnological advances demonstrate that phytocannabinoids and eCBs acting on CBRs are important regulators of various aspects of physiological, behavioral, immunological and metabolic functions. CB2Rs were previously thought to be predominantly expressed in immune cells in the periphery and were traditionally referred to as peripheral CB2Rs. The neuronal and functional expression of CB2Rs in the brain had been controversial and have been less well characterized in comparison with the expression of the ubiquitous CB1Rs. We and others have now demonstrated the expression of CB2Rs in neuronal, glial and endothelial cells in the brain, and this warrants a re-evaluation of the CNS effects of CB2Rs. In this chapter we focused on the neurobiology of CB2Rs and describe its gene structure, regulation, variation, CNS distribution and its emerging role in immuno-endocannabinoid interactions with novel knowledge and deeper insight from the genetic and epigenetic manipulation of CB2Rs. With the rapidly shifting landscape on recreational, medicalization, and legalization of marijuana use, further research will certainly provide the scientific basis to unravel the mode of action of marijuana use and its implication on its neurological and psychiatric effects in human health and disease. We conclude that CB2 cannabinoid receptor signaling plays an important role in neuro-immuno-cannabinoid activity and beyond with potential therapeutic targets in neurological and mental diseases.
Article
Full-text available
Differences between genomes can be due to single nucleotide variants, translocations, inversions, and copy number variants (CNVs, gain or loss of DNA). The latter can range from sub-microscopic events to complete chromosomal aneuploidies. Small CNVs are often benign but those larger than 500 kb are strongly associated with morbid consequences such as developmental disorders and cancer. Detecting CNVs within and between populations is essential to better understand the plasticity of our genome and to elucidate its possible contribution to disease. Hence there is a need for better-tailored and more robust tools for the detection and genome-wide analyses of CNVs. While a link between a given CNV and a disease may have often been established, the relative CNV contribution to disease progression and impact on drug response is not necessarily understood. In this review we discuss the progress, challenges, and limitations that occur at different stages of CNV analysis from the detection (using DNA microarrays and next-generation sequencing) and identification of recurrent CNVs to the association with phenotypes. We emphasize the importance of germline CNVs and propose strategies to aid clinicians to better interpret structural variations and assess their clinical implications.
Article
Full-text available
The precise hierarchy of ancient divergence events that led to the present assemblage of modern placental mammals has been an area of controversy among morphologists, palaeontologists and molecular evolutionists. Here we address the potential weaknesses of limited character and taxon sampling in a comprehensive molecular phylogenetic analysis of 64 species sampled across all extant orders of placental mammals. We examined sequence variation in 18 homologous gene segments (including nearly 10,000 base pairs) that were selected for maximal phylogenetic informativeness in resolving the hierarchy of early mammalian divergence. Phylogenetic analyses identify four primary superordinal clades: (I) Afrotheria (elephants, manatees, hyraxes, tenrecs, aardvark and elephant shrews); (II) Xenarthra (sloths, anteaters and armadillos); (III) Glires (rodents and lagomorphs), as a sister taxon to primates, flying lemurs and tree shrews; and (IV) the remaining orders of placental mammals (cetaceans, artiodactyls, perissodactyls, carnivores, pangolins, bats and core insectivores). Our results provide new insight into the pattern of the early placental mammal radiation.
Article
Full-text available
The development of genetic technologies has led to the identification of several copy number variations (CNVs) in the human genome. Genome rearrangements affect dosage-sensitive gene expression in normal brain development. There is strong evidence associating human psychiatric disorders, especially autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) and schizophrenia to genetic risk factors and accumulated CNV risk loci. Deletions in 1q21, 3q29, 15q13, 17p12, and 22q11, as well as duplications in 16p11, 16p13, and 15q11-13 have been reported as recurrent CNVs in ASD and/or schizophrenia. Chromosome engineering can be a useful technology to reflect human diseases in animal models, especially CNV-based psychiatric disorders. This system, based on the Cre/loxP strategy, uses large chromosome rearrangement such as deletion, duplication, inversion, and translocation. Although it is hard to reflect human pathophysiology in animal models, some aspects of molecular pathways, brain anatomy, cognitive, and behavioral phenotypes can be addressed. Some groups have created animal models of psychiatric disorders, ASD, and schizophrenia, which are based on human CNV. These mouse models display some brain anatomical and behavioral abnormalities, providing insight into human neuropsychiatric disorders that will contribute to novel drug screening for these devastating disorders.
Article
Full-text available
Journal of Human Genetics, official journal of the Japan Society of Human Genetics, publishes original articles and reviews on all aspects of human genetics, including medical genetics and genomics
Article
Introduction: Considerable progress has been made, over the last years, in understanding the role of the endocannabinoid system (ES) in regard to its role in a variety of physiological processes including nociception (pain-sensation), appetite, lipid metabolism, gastrointestinal motility, cardiovascular modulation, motor activity, and memory. Furthermore, ES is strongly associated with human behavior and the skeletal ES is of major importance. ES is comprised of cannabinoid receptors (CB1 and CB2), their endogenous ligands (endocannabinoids) and proteins responsible for their metabolism. Areas covered: To summarize and present all the existing literature that associate CB receptors' polymorphisms with behavior and disease in different populations, as well as its possible therapeutic perspectives. A literature review presenting the most recent data in terms of ES and the latest knowledge regarding the involvement of genetic polymorphisms of cannabinoid receptors in a variety of human diseases and psychiatric and neurological disorders. Expert opinion: The ES is an emerging target for drug discovery, because it is involved in the regulation of many cellular and physiological functions. The modulation of the ES by selective agonists or antagonists may hold tremendous therapeutic potential in various conditions mentioned in this review. However, further information is still required before the ES is completely comprehended.
Article
Copy number variants are small chromosomal deletions and duplications. When they alter the dose of genes critical for normal brain development and adult brain functioning they may cause severe disorders such as autism and schizophrenia. Numerous such loci have recently been identified. They are offering amazing leads for neuropsychiatric research.
Article
 Two well-characterized cannabinoid receptors (CBrs), CB1 and CB2, mediate the effects of cannabinoids and marijuana use, with functional evidence for other CBrs. CB1 receptors are expressed primarily in brain and peripheral tissues. For over a decade several laboratories were unable to detect CB2 receptors in brain and were known to be intensely expressed in peripheral and immune tissues and have traditionally been referred to as peripheral CB2 CBrs. We have reported the discovery and functional presence of CB2 cannabinoid receptors in mammalian brain that may be involved in depression and drug abuse and this was supported by reports of identification of neuronal CB2 receptors that are involved in emesis. We used RT-PCR, immunoblotting, hippocampal cultures, immunohistochemistry, transmission electron microscopy, and stereotaxic techniques with behavioral assays to determine the functional expression of CB2 CBrs in rat brain and mice brain exposed to chronic mild stress (CMS) or those treated with abused drugs. RT-PCR analyses supported the expression of brain CB2 receptor transcripts at levels much lower than those of CB1 receptors. In situ hybridization revealed CB2 mRNA in cerebellar neurons of wild-type but not of CB2 knockout mice. Abundant CB2 receptor immunoreactivity (iCB2) in neuronal and glial processes was detected in brain and CB2 expression was detected in neuron-specific enolase (NSE) positive hippocampal cell cultures. The effect of direct CB2 antisense oligonucleotide injection into the brain and treatment with JWH015 in motor function and plus-maze tests also demonstrated the functional presence of CB2 cannabinoid receptors in the central nervous system (CNS). Thus, contrary to the prevailing view that CB2 CBrs are restricted to peripheral tissues and predominantly in immune cells, we demonstrated that CB2 CBrs and their gene transcripts are widely distributed in the brain. This multifocal expression of CB2 immunoreactivity in brain suggests that CB2 receptors may play broader roles in the brain than previously anticipated and may be exploited as new targets in the treatment of depression and substance abuse.
Article
Excessive alcohol use is the third leading cause of preventable death and is highly correlated with alcohol dependence, a heritable phenotype. Many genetic factors for alcohol dependence have been found, but many remain unknown. In search of additional genetic factors, we examined the association between Diagnostic and StatisticalManual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) alcohol dependence and all common copy number variations (CNVs) with good reliability in the Study of Addiction: Genetics and Environment (SAGE). All participants in SAGE were interviewed using the Semi-Structured Assessment for the Genetics of Alcoholism, as a part of 3 contributing studies. A total of 2,610 non-Hispanic European American samples were genotyped on the Illumina Human 1M array. We performed CNV calling by CNVPartition, PennCNV, and QuantiSNP, and only CNVs identified by all 3 software programs were examined. Association was conducted with the CNV (as a deletion/duplication) as well as with probes in the CNV region. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was used to validate the CNVs in the laboratory. CNVs in 6q14.1 (p = 1.04 × 10(-6) ) and 5q13.2 (p = 3.37 × 10(-4) ) were significantly associated with alcohol dependence after adjusting multiple tests. On chromosome 5q13.2, there were multiple candidate genes previously associated with various neurological disorders. The region on chromosome 6q14.1 is a gene desert that has been associated with mental retardation and language delay. The CNV in 5q13.2 was validated, whereas only a component of the CNV on 6q14.1 was validated by qPCR. Thus, the CNV on 6q14.1 should be viewed with caution. This is the first study to show an association between DSM-IV alcohol dependence and CNVs. CNVs in regions previously associated with neurological disorders may be associated with alcohol dependence.
Article
Under the hypothesis of obesity as a polygenetic disease numerous genes have been associated with an obese phenotype and metabolic co-morbidities. The cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB 1) is part of an underinvestigated system that participates in appetite control. Previous publications suggest that the endocannabinoid systems interact with the better understood leptin–melanocortin axis. Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is a player in the latter. Finally resistin has been shown to influence NPY expression in the brain. In a cohort of 1721 caucasion men and women with a BMI of 25 kg/m2 or more we therefore investigated three candidate polymorphisms at baseline and following 3 months low fat caloric restriction diet by polymerase chain reaction and restriction digestion: the 1359 G/A variant of the cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1), the L7P variation in neuropeptide Y (NPY) and the −420C > G polymorphism in resistin. Comparing groups according to genotype for each gene separately revealed significant results at baseline only for the CB1 gene. However, upon dieting significant data was found for all 3 genes. Carriers of at least one A allele in CB1 lost more weight and reduced LDL cholesterol more than wildtype patients. LL homocygotes in NPY had a greater reduction in glucose, triglycerides, and LDL cholesterol whereas in resistin carriers of the G allele had a greater reduction in weight and triglycerides. Creating two groups defined by NPY and resistin genotype, respectively, with similar BMI values resulted in significant differences concerning weight loss and metabolic improvement. In conclusion, genetic polymorphisms associated with obesity may become relevant only under the condition of a low calory diet. The presence of a certain genotype may then be beneficial for obesity treatment.