Content uploaded by Francisco María Vázquez
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Francisco María Vázquez on Jan 12, 2016
Content may be subject to copyright.
338 Journal Europäischer Orchideen 47 (2-4): 2015.
J. Eur. Orch.
47 (2-4): 338 – 364. 2015.
Francisco M. Vázquez; José Blanco, David García, Francisco Márquez and
María José Guerra
Review of Anacamptis sect. Morianthus taxa from SW Iberian
Peninsula
Keywords
Orchidaceae, Anacamptis, SW Iberian Peninsula, Morio group, Taxonomy,
Portugal, Spain.
Summary
Vázquez, F.M., Blanco, J., García, D., Márquez, F. & M.J. Guerra (2015):
Review of Anacamptis sect. Morianthus taxa from SW Iberian Peninsula.- J.
Eur. Orch. 47 (2-4): 338-364.
The study of diversity of taxa belonging to Anacamptis sect. Morianthus has
revealed a new taxon: Anacamptis longicornu subsp. linkiana, and made
necessary some new combinations of taxa occurring in the whole
Mediterranean area, especially nothotaxa such as Anacamptis ×kusadasiensis,
A. ×nicodemi, A. ×orientecaucasica, A. ×subpapilionacea,
A. ×subpapilionacea nothosubsp. rebbasii, A. ×paparistoi, and A. ×yvesii.
Furthermore Anacamptis sect. Morianthus, A. caucasica, A. caucasica var.
albanica, A. champagneuxii subsp. tlemcenensis are proposed as new
combinations.
Zusammenfassung
Vázquez, F.M., Blanco, J., García, D., Márquez, F. & M.J. Guerra (2015):
Revision der Taxa von Anacamptis sect. Morianthus auf der SW-Iberischen
Halbinsel.- J. Eur. Orch. 47 (2-4): 338-364.
Die Diversität der zu Anacamptis sect. Morianthus gehörenden Taxa wurde
untersucht. Dabei wurde Anacamptis longicornu subsp. linkiana als neue
Unterart erkannt. Weiters ergab sich die Notwendigkeit, mehrere Taxa aus
dem gesamten Mittelmeergebiet neu zu kombinieren, insbesondere Nothotaxa
wie Anacamptis ×kusadasiensis, A. ×nicodemi, A. ×orientecaucasica,
Journal Europäischer Orchideen 47 (2-4): 2015. 339
A. ×subpapilionacea. A. ×subpapilionacea nothosubsp. rebbasii.
A. ×paparistoi, und A. ×yvesii. Zusätzlich werden Anacamptis sect.
Morianthus, A. caucasica, A. caucasica var. albanica und A. champagneuxii
subsp. tlemcenensis neu kombiniert.
* * *
1. Introduction
During a prospection in Baixo Alentejo Litoral (Portugal) in spring 2015 we
found a new population of Anacamptis Rich., where between dominating
Anacamptis picta (Loisel.) R.M.Bateman and A. morio (L.) R.M.Bateman,
Pridgeon & M.W.Chase were present a unidentified plant, which at first
instance remembered a hybrid between A. morio × A. picta. Based on
consulted literature (TYTECA 1997; KRETZSCHMAR et al. 2007; VÁZQUEZ 2009;
DELFORGE 2009) and on its morphological characters also Anacamptis
×heraclea (Verg.) F.M.Vázquez (A. picta × A. laxiflora) seemed to be
possible. The presence of this taxon in the Mediterranean flora however was
always doubted in the past.
Orchis ×heraclea, described by VERGUIN (1908), was soon fully accepted by
CAMUS (1908: 210, Pl. 13, fig. 361) reproducing the drawing of VERGUIN
(1908: Pl. XIV fig. B), citing his illustration however erroneously as fig. 360
instead of fig. 361 (KÜNKELE, in sched.). This may have led to
misinterpretations in the past! Later CAMUS & CAMUS (Ic. Orch. Eur.: Pl. 47,
fig. 9. 1921); 1928: 249) and SOÓ (1931) followed Verguin. From the middle
of the 20th century on however the hybrid taxon for long time were not more
mentioned in the literature on orchids of Europe.
In reviews such as LANDWEHR (1977) or DELFORGE (2006) for European
Orchid flora and a specific review such as BOURNERIAS et al. (2005) for France
Orchis ×heraclea Verg., is not indicated. Only KRETZSCHMAR et al. (2007:
429) remembered this taxon, but modified the original concept, however
without reasoning, and differing from VERGUIN (1908), who classified it as
hybrid between Orchis morio × Orchis picta instead of O, laxiflora × Orchis
picta. Later DELFORGE (2009) and VÁZQUEZ (2009), considered valid the
hybrid-formula and confirmed the interpretation proposed by KRETZSCHMAR et
al. (2007), combining it to Herorchis ×heraclea (Verg.) P.Delforge
respectively Anacamptis ×heraclea (Verg.) F.M.Vázquez. The study of
material type however shows the proposal of KRETZSCHMAR et al. (2007) to be
340 Journal Europäischer Orchideen 47 (2-4): 2015.
not appropriate, as the sepals of type specimen are free, lanceolate, acute
(similar to A. laxiflora), not shaped hull (similar to Anacamptis sect.
Morianthus; and confirms the determination proposed by VERGUIN (l.c.).
Based on the type study of A. ×heraclea we have to revise our first
determination of the undetermined entity of Baixo Alentejo, as this possess
shaped hull sepals, the central lobule of labellum is short, with purple macules,
whereas A. ×heraclea type has not shape hull sepals, its sepals are free, the size
of central lobule of labellum is medium without spots. Our further study of the
morphology entity of the Baixo Alentejo confirms its particular status,
independent from the rest of the Morio-group species present at the same site.
It can be segregated from Anacamptis morio and A. picta for the longer and
apically widened spur, for lateral lobules of labellum longer than the central
lobule, with high ovary apex curve (<65º), not present in the A. morio or
A. picta exemplars.
Finally, further studies of additional materials from SW Iberian Peninsula
conserved in HSS (see appendix I) sub A. picta, can be attributed to the new
entity from Baixo Alentejo giving a better knowledge on its distribution in SW
Iberian Peninsula.
2. The Anacamptis problematic in SW Iberian Peninsula
As the hitherto presented studies confirm the absence of Anacamptis ×heraclea
from SW Iberian Peninsula, we retain it necessary to study the materials
collected in Baixo Alentejo in detail in comparison to all representatives of the
Morio-group known from SW Iberian.
2.1 Anacamptis longicornu subsp. longicornu
The first indication of Anacamptis longicornu from SW Iberian Peninsula
refers to Lusitania (LINK in REICHENBACH 1851); afterwards A. longicornu was
specifically confirmed by GUIMARAES (1887) in Algarve and Baixo Alentejo
(Portugal), included in CAMUS et al. (1908, 1928) too. Later further
populations were cited for Puebla de Obando and Roca de la Sierra populations
(Badajoz, España) by RIVAS GODAY (1964), collected in Northern Sevilla
province (AEDO 2005, LANDWEHR (1977) and annotated as present in SW
Iberian Peninsula. Recent revisions of the Orchid flora of SW Iberian
Peninsula (Portugal, Spain, Extremadura) (TYTECA 1997; TYTECA et al. 2000;
2003; AEDO 2005; DELFORGE 2006; KRETZSCHMAR et al. 2007; VÁZQUEZ
2009) however ignored its presence. The studies of RIVAS GODAY (1964) and
Journal Europäischer Orchideen 47 (2-4): 2015. 341
LANDWEHR (1977) indicated the presence of both A. longicornu and A. picta,
but TYTECA et al. (1986) and later KRETZSCHMAR et al. 2007 interpreted the
reports of GUIMARAES (1887) as variability of A. picta. Later TYTECA (1997)
doubts his former classification and emphasizes the need of a profound study.
A. longicornu is distributed mainly in North Africa, Sicily (Italy) and
occidental Mediterranean islands (AEDO 2005; KRETZSCHMAR et al. 2007), and
little populations in South France (BOURNERIAS et al. 2005; JULVE et al.,
2015), an historical site near Seville (SW Spain) was indicated by AEDO
(2005).
The information on orchid flora of Occidental Mediterranean published during
the XIX and XX centuries gives no clear distribution for A. longicornu. The
main limits to A. longicornu distribution knowledge are the different authors
opinions and the related taxa associated to A. longicornu.
2.2 Anacamptis champagneuxii subsp. tlemcenensis
Further to A. longicornu also Orchis longicornu var. tlemcenensis described by
BATTANDIER et al. (1895), from Algeria has to be considered. This new taxon
is near to A. picta, but its flowers are longer, with irregular spots, longer spur
and uniformly coloured labellum. The characters are different from the
nominate form of A. champagneuxii. Also, the morphological analysis
indicates proximity with A. longicornu and A. picta as already mentioned by
BATTANDIER et al. (1895); but this taxon is known from North Africa only
(BAUMANN et al. 2006; KRETZSCHMAR et al. 2007).
Long before BATTANDIER (1895) described his O. longicornu var.
tlemcenensis, BOISSIER (1842) described Orchis morio var. longicalcarata, an
intermediate taxon between O. longicornu and O. picta (sensu BOISSIER), but
without spots on the labellum; the distribution proposed by BOISSIER (1842)
extended from Spain and Southern France to Greece. The morphology as
characterized by BOISSIER places the new taxon near to A. champagneuxii and
Anacamptis caucasica (see Fig. 1)..
2.3 Orchis picta f. grandis
Apart from these validly published taxa of the morio-group, FREYN, under the
invalid name Orchis picta Loisel. f. grandis Freyn, mentioned an entity near to
A. picta, characterised by a high tall plant with flowers larger than 10 mm (in
herbarium, COI-WILLK 48906).
342 Journal Europäischer Orchideen 47 (2-4): 2015.
Fig. 1: Drawings. 1: Anacamptis longicornu subsp. linkiana. Typical flowers.
a: A. picta; b: A. champagneuxii subsp. champagneuxii; c: A. champagneuxii
subps. tlemcenensis; d: A. longicornu subsp. longicornu; e: A. morio; f: A.
longicornu subsp. linkiana. Bars indicate 10 mm.
Journal Europäischer Orchideen 47 (2-4): 2015. 343
3.The Anacamptis diversity in SW Iberian Peninsula
This situation invites to a morphological comparison between the
indeterminate entity from SW Iberian Peninsula and the other taxa of
Anacamptis cited above. From this analysis insight into the position of the
indeterminate entity within the section Morianthus can be obtained, the single
data are shown in Table 1. As the absence of A. ×heraclea in SW Iberian
Peninsula has been confirmed, it was excluded from the analysis together with
Orchis morio L. var. longicalcarata and Orchis picta Loisel. f. grandis.
Table 1: Comparison of flower morphology, reproduction, habitat and
flowering period between Anacamptis-taxa related with Anacamptis
populations from SW Iberian Peninsula studied. Measures [mm] are based on
the studied material (vouchers).
Anacamptis
Charac-
ters (mm) champag-
neuxii morio longicornu
tlemce-
nensis SW Iberian picta
Spur
Length 9-15(16) 9-12(13) 12-16(18) 9-14(15) 10-14(15) (8)9-11
Width 3-4 3-4 3-5 2-3 3-4 2-3
Inclination [º] 70º-90º 75º-95º 40º-60º 65º-80º 50º-65º 65º-90º
Apex mor-
phology widened not widened widened not widened widened not widened
Labellum
Length 6-12(14) 6,5-14 6,5-10(11) 8-12(14) 7-11(12) 4-7(9)
Width 7-15(17) 7-15(16) 9-12(14) 10-16(17) 11-14(15) 5-8(10)
Colour purple/white purple purple/white purple/white purple/white pink/white
Spots
Presence - + + +/- + +
Number [n] 0 6-14 7-14 (0)1-11 5-12 3-7
Morpho-
logy not
applicable rounded rounded
irregular/line
s rounded/irre
gular rounded/irre
gular
Labellum
lobules
Length
Lateral 2,5-5,5 2-4 2,5-4,5 3-5 3-5 2-3,5
Lateral
margin lobulated lobulated
whole/lobula
ted lobulated lobulated whole
Length
Central 2,5-5 3-5 2-3 3,5-5 0,5-1,5 1,5-2,5
Central
margin whole/lobula
ted lobulated whole lobulated whole whole
Ratio
Length L= or >C L= or <C L>>C L= or <C L>>>C L> or =C
344 Journal Europäischer Orchideen 47 (2-4): 2015.
Anacamptis
Charac-
ters (mm) champag-
neuxii morio longicornu
tlemce-
nensis SW Iberian picta
Lat./Cent.
Flower
bract
Long 7-10(11) 7-11 6-9(10) 8-11(12) 7-9(10) 5-9
Apex acute acute acute acute obtuse obtuse
Ovary
Length 9-15(16) 9-16 9-15(16) 10-17 9-15(16) 8-12
Apex curve
(º) 70º-90º 70º-90º 40º-50º 60º-80º 50º-60º 70º-95º
Ration
Length
Ovary/Brac
t
1,38 1,47 1,56 1,35 1,55 1,42
Habitat basic soils neutral soils independent
soils basic soils acid soils acid soils
Vegeta-
tive repro-
duction
stolon to
sessile tuber sessile tuber sessile tuber sessile to
stolon tuber sessile tuber sessile tuber
Flowering
period (I)II-V III-VI (I)II-V II-V II-V I-IV
The comparison in Table 1 revealed the close relations of the indeterminate
entity from SW Iberian Peninsula with A. longicornu and A. picta, as well as a
close relation between the taxa A. tlemcenensis and A. champagneuxii s.s.
From these studies the populations from SW Iberian Peninsula result as an
independent taxon related to A. longicornu, for the similar inclination in the
flowers, curvature in the ovary, ratio between length ovary/ length flower
bract, macules morphology and distribution or apex morphology of the spur;
but with differences in the spur length (longer in A. longicornu), length of the
central labellum lobule (longer in A. longicornu), labellum length (longer in
SW Iberian populations) and the habitat (indifferent soil in A. longicornu
versus acid soils in SW Iberian populations).
A. picta and the indeterminate Anacamptis-entity from SW Iberian Peninsula
grow in the same habitat, have spots on the labellum and not prolonged tubers,
but the flowers dimension, morphology, position, flowers bract dimensions and
flowering periods are different.
By studying the synonymous taxa related to A. picta, we discovered the
incorrect attribution of Orchis nicodemi Cirilo ex Ten., as synonym to A. picta
Journal Europäischer Orchideen 47 (2-4): 2015. 345
(KRETZSCHMAR et al. 2007). The type has free sepals, an acute apex, not
rounded apex curved such as helmet, the label is intermediate to A. morio and
A. papilionacea: plane label, with lateral lobules undulated margin, and ample
central lobule, also short spur (less to label long) not inclined. The type of
Orchis nicodemi represents the hybrid between A. morio × A. papilonacea (see
Fig. 7).
From the other taxa of Anacamptis compared here we can discriminate the
indeterminate Anacamptis-entity from SW Iberian Peninsula for the ovary
curvature, flower inclination, ratio between length ovary/ length flower bract,
and for the shorter central labellum lobule.
4. Anacamptis longicornu subsp. linkiana, a new taxon from SW Iberia
In summary our results show the distinct status of the hitherto unknown SW
Iberian entity in comparison to related taxa and its close relation to
A. longicornu, justifying its description as a new subspecies of Anacamptis
longicornu subsp. linkiana, in honour of Johann Heinrich Friedrich Link (1767
– 1851), collector of its first botanical material (REICHENBACH f. 1851).
Anacamptis longicornu (Poir.) R.M.Bateman, Pridgeon & M.W.Chase subsp.
linkiana F.M.Vázquez subsp. nov.
Diagnosis: Affinis subspecies Anacamptis longicornu subsp. longicornu, a qua
differt calcare breviore (A. longicornu subsp linkiana 9-12(14) mm versus
A. longicornu subsp longicornu 10-16(18) mm), bracteis florum apice
obtusibus (acutis in A. longicornu subsp longicornu); labello ampliore (A.
longicornu subsp linkiana 7-11(12) × 11-14(15) mm versus A. longicornu
subsp longicornu 6,5-10(11) × 9-12(14) mm), et habitatio diversa, terra acida
non terra calcarea quoad A. longicornu subsp longicornu.
Holotype: LU: Baixo Alentejo: Between Melides and Grandola, 38º10’52’’N
8º37’57’’W, 236 msm, Cork oak forest, 04.04.2015, leg. L. Concepción, D.M.
Vázquez & F.M.Vázquez (HSS 63881 single exemplar) (see Fig. 4)
Description: Tall plant up to 45 cm. Basal leaves lanceolate 5-14(16) × 0,3-
1(1,2) cm; stem leaves (1)2-3. Inflorescence up to 12(14) cm, (4)5-10(12)
flowers. Flower bracts oblong 7-9(10) mm, obtuse. Flowers inclined 50º-65º
versus vertical inflorescence axis; labellum 7-11(12) × 11-14(15) mm, lateral
lobules purple to black-pink, in the middle pink to white, lateral lobules 3-5
mm, lobulated; central lobule 0,5-1,5 mm, entire; medium lobe spotted, with 5-
12 spots in two rows, rounded to irregular outline; spur 9-12(14) mm long,
frequently widened at apex, occasionally with rounded apex. Ovary 9-15(16)
mm long, versus apex curved 50º-60º versus vertical inflorescence axis.
Icones: Figs. 1-4, hoc loco.
346 Journal Europäischer Orchideen 47 (2-4): 2015.
Fig. 2: Anacamptis longicornu subsp. linkiana, plant, Baixo Alentejo:
Between Melides and Grandola, 04.IV.2015 (phot. FMV).
Journal Europäischer Orchideen 47 (2-4): 2015. 347
Fig. 3: Anacamptis longicornu subsp. linkiana, inflorescence, Baixo
Alentejo: Between Melides and Grandola, 04.IV.2015 (phot. FMV).
348 Journal Europäischer Orchideen 47 (2-4): 2015.
Habitat: Cork and Holm oak forest, and serial shrub formations of the SW
Iberian Peninsula. Frequently on acid soils, in small valleys with constant soil
humidity of sites during winter and summer. Habitats usually covered by trees
and shrubs, not open.
Although A. champagneuxii and A. tlemcenensis frequently have been
synonymized, our study confirms their close relation, but we can separate the
two taxa by labellum and spur morphologies. The labellum of
A. champagneuxii bears no spots, with central lobule equal or shorter than
lateral lobules, with spur widened at apex, whereas the labellum of
A. tlemcenensis is spotted (frequently with irregular rows), with central lobule
equal or longer than lateral lobules, and the spur is rounded at apex. These
results indicate the close relations between two taxa and we think
subordination of A. tlemcenensis to A. champagneuxii supports the above
comments (see also annotations referring to A. champagneuxii treatment in
VÁZQUEZ 2009).
The following key supports the determination of the taxa of Anacamptis
considered in this study:
5. Key for Anacamptis taxa related in the study
1 Plants with prolonged tubers. Flowers with or without spots ......................... 2
1* Plants without prolonged tubers. Flowers with spots ..................................... 3
2 Flowers without spots. Lateral lobules of labellum shorter or equal than
central lobule ................................. A. champagneuxii subsp. champagneuxii
2* Flowers with or without spots in lines or irregulars. Lateral lobules of
labellum longer or equal than central lobule
.......................................................... A. champagneuxii subsp. tlemcenensis
3 Spur shorter than labellum. Lateral lobules equal or longer than central
lobule .................................................................................................. A. morio
3* Spur equal or longer than labellum. Lateral lobules shorter or equal than
central lobule ................................................................................................... 4
4 Spur more than 10 mm, widened apex. Highly inclined flowers 40º-65º
versus vertical inflorescence axis. Ovary apex curved 40º-60º. Median
flowers with labellum 6,5-11(12) mm............................................................. 5
4* Spur (8)9-11 mm, rounded apex. Medium inclined flowers 65º-90º
versus vertical inflorescence axis. Ovary apex curved 70º-95º. Little
flowers with labellum 4-7(9) mm ......................................................... A. picta
Journal Europäischer Orchideen 47 (2-4): 2015. 349
5 C
entral lobule label less 1,5 mm. Obtuse flowers bracts. Flowers with
medium spur length 9-12(14) mm. Plants on acid soils
.......................................................................... A. longicornu subsp. linkiana
5* Central lobule label more 2 mm. Acute flowers bracts. Flowers with
long spur 10-16(18) mm. Plants on indifferent soils
..................................................................... A. longicornu subsp. longicornu
6. Nomenclatural proposals
Anacamptis sect. Morianthus (Schltr.) F.M. Vazquez & R.Lorenz, comb. nov.
Bas.: Orchis sect. Morianthus Schltr. in Keller & Schlechter, Monogr. Iconogr.
Orch. Eur. I, Feddes Repert., Sonderh. A 1: 159-160. 1926. Typus: Orchis
morio L. (BAUMANN & LORENZ, J. Eur. Orch. 38(1): 177. 2006).
Syn.: Orchis subsect. Moriones Rchb. f., Icon. Fl. germ. helv. v. 13/14: 15, 17. 1850)
Orchis sect. Moriones (Rchb. f.) Quentin, Orchidées France, Belgique &
Luxembourg, ed. 2 479. 2005, nom. incorr. (ICN Art. 11.4).
Anacamptis sect. Moriones (Parl.) H. Kretzschmar, Eccarius, H. Dietr., Orchid Gen.
Anacamptis Orchis Neotinea 115. 2007, nom. inval. (cit. basionymi apud Rchb.f.
1850 omissa, ICN Art. 41.5; quoad subsectio Moriones Rchb. 1860 apud Parl.,
non sectio stat. nov.).
Anacamptis sect. Morianthus (Schltr.) Kuropatkin & Efimov, Cons. Cult. Orch.
Minsk: 122. 2015 (nom. inval., cit. basionymi omissa, Art.41.5).
6.1 Species taxa
Anacamptis caucasica (K.Koch) F.M.Vázquez comb. nov.
Bas.: { Orchis morio L. var. caucasica K.Koch, Linnaea, 22: 280. 1849
(Holotype: B 10 0367508!; the designation of a neotype by AKHALKATSI et
al. (2005: 902) is superseded by the discovery of the type specimen in B, see
Fig. 8).
Syn.: { Orchis morio L. subsp. caucasica (K.Koch) E.G.Camus, Bergon &
A. Camus, Monogr. Orchid. Europ.: 106. 1908.
{ Orchis morio L. subsp. picta (Loisel.) K.Richt. var. caucasica (K.Koch) Soó,
Fedde Rep. Sp. Nov., 24: 28. 1927.
{ Orchis morio L. subsp. caucasica (K.Koch) Hayek, Fedde Rep. Sp. Nov., 30(3):
385. 1933, nom. superfl.
{ Orchis picta Loisel. var. caucasica (K.Koch) P.Delforge, Naturalistes Belges,
87(Orchid. 19): 261. 2006.
{ Herorchis picta (Loisel.) P.Delforge var. caucasica (K.Koch) P.Delforge,
Naturalistes Belges, 90(Orchid. 22): 28. 2009.
{ Herorchis caucasica (K.Koch) Devillers-Tersch., Devillers, Dedroog, Baeten &
Flausch, Naturalistes Belges, 91(Orchid. 23): 245. 2010.
350 Journal Europäischer Orchideen 47 (2-4): 2015.
Anacamptis caucasica (K.Koch) F.M.Vázquez var. albanica (Gölz &
H.R.Reinhard) F.M.Vázquez comb. nov.
Bas.: { Orchis albanica Gölz & H.R.Reinhard, Mitteilungsbl. Arbeitskreis
Heimische Orchid. Baden-Württemberg, 16(2): 223. 1984 (Holotype:
Z-0000140! , see Fig. 6))
Syn.: { Orchis morio Ucria subsp. albanica (Gölz & H.R.Reinhard) Buttler,
Willdenowia, 16(1): 116. 1986.
{ Orchis picta Loisel. var. albanica (Gölz & H.R.Reinhard) P.Delforge, Naturalistes
Belges, 87(Orchid. 19): 261. 2006.
{ Anacamptis morio (L.) R.M.Bateman, Pridgeon & M.W.Chase subsp. albanica
(Gölz & H.R.Reinhard) Kreutz, Ber. Arbeitskreis. Heimische Orchid., 24(1): 144.
2007.
{ Herorchis picta (Loisel.) P.Delforge var. albanica (Gölz & H.R.Reinhard)
P.Delforge, Naturalistes Belges, 90(Orchid. 22): 28. 2009.
Anacamptis champagneuxii subsp. champagneuxii (Barnéoud)
R.M.Bateman, Pridgeon & M.W.Chase, Lindleyana, 12(3): 120. 1997.
Bas.: { Orchis champagneuxii Barnéoud, Ann. Sci. Nat. Bot., 20: 380 n. 2.
1843. (Lectotype: SLL! (KRETZSCHMAR et al. 2007))
Syn.: = Orchis morio var. longicalcarata Boiss., Voy. Bot. Espagne 2(19): 594.
1842, (Lectotype: n.v.).
= Orchis morio L. var. picta sensu Pérez Lara, Anales Soc. Esp. Hist. Nat., 15: 450
n. 265. 1886, non (Loisel) Rchb. f., Icon. Fl. Germ. Helv. 13/14: 17, n. 2, tab. 13,
fig. I. 1851.
{ Orchis morio L. var. champagneuxii (Barnéoud) J.A.Guim., Bol. Soc. Brot., 5: 64.
1887.
{ Orchis morio L. subsp. champagneuxii (Barnéoud) E.G.Camus in E.G.Camus &
A.Camus, Iconogr. Orchid. Europe, 1: 154. 1928.
{ Anacamptis morio (L.) R.M.Bateman, Pridgeon & M.W.Chase subsp.
champagneuxii (Barnéoud) H.Kretzschmar, Eccarius & H.Dietr., Orchid. Gen. ed.
2ª: 130. 2007.
{ Herorchis champagneuxii (Barnéoud) D.Tyteca & E.Klein, J. Eur. Orch., 40(3):
541. 2008.
= Orchis morio auct. pl. non Linnaeus, Sp. Pl.: 940, nº 8. 1753.
Anacamptis champagneuxii (Barnéoud) R.M.Bateman, Pridgeon &
M.W.Chase subps. tlemcenensis (Batt.) F.M. Vázquez comb. nov.
Bas.: { Orchis longicornu Poir. var. tlemcenensis Batt. in Battandier & Trabut,
Flore de l’Algérie, 1(2): 27. 1895 & Bull. Soc. Bot. France, 51: 352. 1904.
(Lectotype: MPU 010471! left inferior exemplar, designated here))
Syn.: = Orchis morio L. var. mesomelana Rchb.fil., Icon. Fl. Germ. Helv., 13/14:
182 n. 2. 1851. (Lectotype: in W n.v.)
{ Orchis morio L. subsp. tlemcenensis (Batt.) E.G.Camus, Bergon & A. Camus,
Journal Europäischer Orchideen 47 (2-4): 2015. 351
Monogr. Orchid. Europ.: 106. 1908.
{ Orchis tlemcenensis (Batt.) E.G.Camus, Bergon & A. Camus, Monogr. Orchid.
Europ.: 106. 1908.
{ Orchis morio L. var. tlemcenensis (Batt.) Maire & Weiller, Fl. Afrique N., 6: 293.
1939.
= Orchis morio L. subsp. champagneuxii var. mesomelana (Rchb. F.) D.Tyteca,
Orchidophile (Asnières) 70: 997, fig. 3. 1986.
= Herorchis champagneuxii (Barnéoud) D.Tyteca & E.Klein f. mesomelana
(Rchb.f.) P.Delforge, Naturalistes Belges, 90(Orchid. 22): 28. 2009.
{ Anacamptis longicornu (Poir.) R.M.Bateman, Pridgeon & M.W.Chase subsp.
tlemcenensis (Batt.) F.M.Vázquez, Fol. Bot. Extremadur., 3: 193. 2009.
= Anacamptis champagneuxii (Barnéoud) R.M.Bateman, Pridgeon & M.W.Chase
var. mesomelana (Rchb.fil.) F.M.Vázquez, Fol. Bot. Extremadur., 3: 191. 2009.
= Orchis picta Loisel. f. grandis Freyn in herbarium (COI-Willk 48906).
Anacamptis longicornu subsp. longicornu (Poir.) R.M.Bateman, Pridgeon &
M.W.Chase, Lindleyana, 12(3): 120. 1997.
Bas.: { Orchis longicornu Poir., Voy. Barbarie, 2: 247. 1789. (Lectotype:
P-COSSON 00420232! rigth inferior exemplar (KRETZSCHMAR et al., 2007))
Syn.: { Orchis morio L.var. longicornu (Poir.) Knoche, Fl. Baléar., 1: 400. 1921.
{ Orchis morio L. subsp. longicornu (Poir.) Kreutz, Eurorchis, 17: 114. 2005.
{ Herorchis longicornu (Poir.) D.Tyteca & E.Klein, J. Eur. Orch., 40(3): 541. 2008.
Anacamptis longicornu (Poir.) R.M.Bateman, Pridgeon & M.W.Chase subsp.
linkiana F.M.Vázquez J. Eur. Orch. 47(2-4): 345. 2015.
Syn.: = Orchis longicornu auct. pl., non Poiret, Voy. Barbarie, 2: 247. 1789.
= Orchis picta auct. pl., non Loiseleur, Mém. Soc. Linn. Paris, 6: 431. 1827.
Anacamptis morio (L.) R.M.Bateman, Pridgeon & M.W.Chase, Lindleyana,
12(3): 120. 1997.
Bas.: { Orchis morio L., Sp. Pl.: 940, nº 8. 1753. (Lectotype: “L.Fuchs, Hist.
Strip.: 553 (1543). Sub Triorchis serapias mas, ca 1535-1538, leg Leonhart
Fuchs!”(BAUMANN et al. 1989))
Syn.: = Orchis crenulata Gilib., Exerc. Phyt., 2: 474. 1792.
= Orchis moria Retz., Fl. Scand. Prodr.: 166. 1779.
{ Orchis officinalis Salisb., Prodr. Strip. Chap. Allerton: 6. 1796, nom. inval.
= Serapias athensis Lej., Fl. Spa. 2: 196. 1813.
= Helleborine athensis Hocq., Fl. Jemmape: 238. 1814.
= Orchis intermedia Meigen & Weniger, Syst. Verz. Ufern Rheins Pfl.: 106. 1819.
= Orchis athensis Dumort., Fl. Belg.: 132. 1827.
= Orchis skorpili Velen., Oesterr. Bot. Z., 32: 257. 1886.
= Orchis graeca Orph. ex Soó, Ark. Bot., 23: 37. 1928.
{ Herorchis morio (L.) D.Tyteca & E.Klein, J. Eur. Orch., 40(3): 541. 2008.
352 Journal Europäischer Orchideen 47 (2-4): 2015.
Anacamptis picta (Loisel.) R.M.Bateman, Bot. J. Linn. Soc., 142(1): 12. 2003.
(Holotype: AV-Loiseleur!)
Bas.: { Orchis picta Loisel., Mém. Soc. Linn. Paris, 6: 431. 1827, non
Rafinesque, Med. Repos., 5: 354. 1808, nom. dub. (Holotype: AV-
Loiseleur!, (KRETZSCHMAR et al. 2007)).
Syn.: = Orchis picta Loisel., Fl. Gallica, ed. 2, 2: 263-264 tab. 26. 1828, nom. nud.
{ Orchis longicurnu Poir. var. picta (Loisel.) Lindl., Gen. Sp. Orch.: 269. 1835.
{ Orchis morio L. var. picta (Loisel.) Rchb. f., Icon. Fl. Germ. Helv. 13/14: 17 n. 2
tab. 13. 1850.
{ Orchis morio L. subsp. picta (Loisel.) K.Richt., Pl. Eur., 1: 265. 1890; {Orchis
morio L. subsp. picta (Loisel.) Arcang. in Comp. Fl. It., ed. 2ª: 167. 1894, nom.
superfl.
{ Orchis morio L. subsp. picta (Loisel.) Asch. & Graebner var. eu-picta Maire &
Weiller, Fl. Afrique N., 6: 292. 1939, nom. inval. (Melbourne Code, Art. 23)
{ Anacamptis morio (L.) R.M.Bateman, Pridgeon & M.W.Chase subsp. picta
(Loisel.) P. Jacquet & Scappaticci, Répartit. Orchid. Souv. France: III, 3 mise a
jour: 7. 2003.
{ Herorchis picta P.Delforge, Naturalistes Belges, 90(Orchid. 22): 25. 2009.
= Orchis champagneuxii auct. pl. non Barnéoud, Ann. Sci. Nat. Bot., 20: 380 n. 2.
1843.
6.2 Hybrid taxa (Nothotaxa)
Anacamptis ×heraclea (Verg.) F.M.Vázquez, Fol. Bot. Extremadur., 3: 188.
2009. (Parents: A. picta × A. laxiflora)
Bas.: { Orchis ×heraclea Verg., Bull. Soc. Bot. France, 54: 602. 1908.
Lectotype: P02101335!, designated here. Massive des Maures, sur le
sommet des collines qui dominent Cavalaire, 24.5.1906-27.5.1906, leg.
L. Verguin (see Fig. 5). Syntypes: P02101336!, id. loc., dat., coll.
Syn.: { Herorchis ×heraclea (Verg.) P.Delforge, Naturalistes Belges, 90(Orchid.
22): 29. 2009.
Anacamptis ×nicodemi (Cirillo ex Ten.) F.M.Vázquez comb. nov. (Parents:
Anacamptis morio subsp. morio × Anacamptis papilionacea subsp.
papilionacea)
Bas.: { Orchis ×nicodemi Cirillo ex Ten., Fl. Napol., 1(2): 290. 1820, pro sp.
(Holotype: Tenore 1820. Flora Neapolitana, tab. 90! designated here, see
Fig. 7).
Syn.: = Orchis ×gennarii Rchb. f., Icon. Fl. Germ. Helv., 13/14: 172. Tab. 168. 1851.
(Lectotype: Reichembach f. 1851. Icon. Fl. Germ. Helv., 13/14: Tab. 168.I!)
= Anacamptis ×gennarii (Rchb.f.) Nazzaro & La Valva, Orch. Somma Vesuvio
93, In: PICIARELLO et al (2000): Biodiv. Parco Naz. Vesuvio. 79-97.
Journal Europäischer Orchideen 47 (2-4): 2015. 353
= Anacamptis ×gennarii (Rchb.f.) H.Kretzschmar, Eccarius & H.Dietr., Orchid Gen.
Anacamptis Orchis Neotinea: 429. 2007, isonym..
= ×Heromeulenia gennarii (Rchb.f.) P.Delforge, Naturalistes Belges 90 (Orchid.
22): 32. 2009.
Anacamptis ×orientecaucasica (B.Baumann, H.Baumann, R.Lorenz & Ruedi
Peter) F.M.Vázquez nothosubsp. orientecaucasica comb. nov. (Parents:
Anacamptis caucasica × Anacamptis papilionacea subsp. schirwanica)
Bas.: { Orchis ×gennarii Rchb.f. nothosubsp. orientecaucasica B.Baumann,
H.Baumann, R.Lorenz & Ruedi Peter, J. Eur. Orch., 35(1): 192. 2003.
Syn.: { ×Heromeulenia orientecaucasica (B.Baumann, H.Baumann, R.Lorenz &
Ruedi Peter) P.Delforge, Naturalistes Belges, 90(Orchid. 22): 32. 2009.)
Anacamptis ×orientecaucasica (B.Baumann, H.Baumann, R.Lorenz & Ruedi
Peter) F.M.Vázquez nothosubsp. kusadasiensis (B.Baumann & H.Baumann)
F.M.Vázquez comb. nov. (Parents: Anacamptis caucasica × Anacamptis
papilionacea subsp. messenica)
Bas.: = Orchis ×gennarii Rchb.f. nothosubsp. kusadasiensis B.Baumann &
H.Baumann, J. Eur. Orch., 37(4): 961 (fig. 4). 2005.
Syn.: = Anacamptis ×gennarii (Rchb.f.) H.Kretzschmar, Eccarius & H.Dietr.
nothosubsp. kusadasiensis (B.Baumann & H.Baumann) H.Kretzschmar, Eccarius
& H.Dietr., Orchid Gen. Anacamptis Orchis Neotinea: 429. 2007.)
Anacamptis ×subpapilionacea (R.Lopes) F.M.Vázquez comb. nov.,
nothosubsp. subpapilionacea (Parents: Anacamptis champagneuxii subsp.
champagneuxii × Anacamptis papilionacea subsp. grandiflora)
Bas.:
{
Orchis ×gennarii Rchb.f. nm. subpapilionacea R.Lopes, Bol. Soc.
Brot. sér. 2, 54: 306. 1981.
Syn.:
{
Anacamptis ×gennarii (Rchb.f.) H.Kretzschmar, Eccarius & H.Dietr.
nothosubsp. subpapilionacea (R.Lopes) H.Kretzschmar, Eccarius & H.Dietr.,
Orchid Gen. Anacamptis Orchis Neotinea: 430. 2007.
{
×Heromeulenia subpapilionacea (R.Lopes) P.Delforge, Naturalistes Belges,
90(Orchid. 22): 32. 2009.
Anacamptis ×subpapilionacea (R.Lopes) F.M.Vázquez nothosubsp. rebbasii
(Babali, Kreutz, Bouazza, Minara & Ait-Hamm.) F.M.Vázquez comb. nov.
(Parents: Anacamptis champagneuxii subsp tlemcenensis × Anacamptis
papilionacea subsp. grandiflora)
Bas.:
{
Anacamptis ×gennarii (Rchb.f.) H.Kretzschmar, Eccarius & H.Dietr.
nothosubsp. rebbasii Babali, Kreutz, Bouazza, Minara & Ait-Hamm.,
Lagascalia, 33: 346. 2013.
354 Journal Europäischer Orchideen 47 (2-4): 2015.
Anacamptis ×paparist[i]oi (Gölz & H.R.Reinhard) F.M.Vázquez comb. nov.
(Parents: Anacamptis coriophora x Anacamptis caucasica)
Bas.: { Orchis ×paparist[i]oi Gölz & H.R.Reinhard, Mitteilungsbl.
Arbeitskreis Heimische Orchid. Baden-Württemberg, 16(2): 231. 1984.
Syn.: { Anacamptis ×olida (Bréb.) H.Kretzschmar , Eccarius & H.Dietr. nothosubsp.
paparistoi (Gölz & H.R.Reinhard ) H.Kretzschmar , Eccarius & H.Dietr., Orchid
Gen. Anacamptis Orchis Neotinea: 428. 2007.
{
×Anterioherorchis paparistoi (Gölz & H.R.Reinhard) P.Delforge, Naturalistes
Belges, 90(Orchid. 22): 31. 2009.
Anacamptis ×yvesii (Verg.) F.M.Vázquez comb. nov. (Parents: Anacamptis
papilionacea subsp. papilionacea × Anacamptis picta)
Bas.: { Orchis ×yvesii Verg., Bull. Soc. Bot. France 54: 600. 1908.
7. Material studied (selection)
Anacamptis caucasica
Georgia: [Protolog: Grusien, Daghestan]. [Protolog: Mergel- und Kalkhöhen].
Alt.: [Protolog: 500-2000' H.]. ͒Leg.: K. Koch 6813 (B100367508)
(Holotype)
Anacamptis caucasica var. albanica
Albania: Lushnjë: Strand von Divjakë; 2 m, 16-IV-1982, P. Gölz (382037)
(Z000000140) (Holotype)
Anacamptis champagneuxii subsp. champagneuxii
Hs: Badajoz (Ba): Badajoz, Urbanización Las Vaguadas, praderas de Celtica
gigantea, 29SPD70, 29-V-2005, C. Vázquez & F.M. Vázquez (HSS18321);
Badajoz, Ctra. Campo Maior, 29SPD71, 31-III-2001, J. Blanco, P. Escobar &
V.M. Ferreira (HSS7884); Fuente del Maestre, Sierra de San Jorge, 29SQC26,
10-III-2003, J. Blanco, A.B. Lucas & F.M. Vázquez (HSS8837); Monesterio,
Tentudía, subida al Monasterio de Tentudía, 29SQC31, 05-V-2006, D. García,
S. Ramos & F.M. Vázquez (HSS22047); San Jorge de Alor, sierra de Alor, en
acebuchales y olivares abandonados, 29SPC67, 27-III-2006, D. García, S.
Ramos & F.M. Vázquez (HSS18384); Valle de Matamoros, zonas adehesadas
y márgenes de vías y arroyos, 29SPC95, 07-IV-1998, F.M. Vázquez
(HSS223). Cáceres (Cc): Almaraz, sierra de Almaraz, en Olivares
abandonados, 30STK70, 03-IV-2006, J. Blanco, S. Ramos & F.M. Vázquez
(HSS18792).
Lu: Alto Alentejo (AAl): Estremoz, Estremoz, Venta da Porca, en Olivares
Journal Europäischer Orchideen 47 (2-4): 2015. 355
abandonados, 29SPD20, 08-IV-2006, F.M. Vázquez (HSS19114); Villa
Vicosa, en Olivares abandonados, 29SPC39, 08-IV-2006, F.M. Vázquez
(HSS19126 ).
Anacamptis champagneuxii subsp. tlemcenensis
Hs: Badajoz (Ba): Alconera, 29SQC15,Proximidades de las canteras, 19-IV-
2003, F.M Vázquez (HSS9347); San Vicente de Alcántara - Salorino,
29SPD65, 28-IV-2008,S. Rincón & F.M. Vázquez, (HSS38303); Santa
Amalia, 29SQD52, 12-III-2009, A. Bejarano, M. Gutiérrez & F.M. Vázquez;
Fuente del Maestre, Sierra Cabrera, 29SQC26, En matorrales seriales de
tomillos y jarales, 520 msm, 18-III-2007, F.M. Vázquez, (HSS30085);
Badajoz, ribera del Calamón, 29SPD70, Urbanización Calamón con Celtica
gigantea (Link) Vazq. & Bark, 01-IV-2007, F.M. Vázquez, (HSS30414);
Badajoz- Valverde de Leganés. Ctra. Km 8,5, 29SPC79, 01-IV-2007, F.M.
Vázquez (HSS30420); Lobón, Finca Los Concejiles, 29SPD00, Olivar-
Almendral, 06-IV-2007, Gutiérrez & R. Valadés, (HSS30402); Alconera, cerca
de Finca “El Avellano”,29SQC25, Olivares abandonados, 07-IV-2007, F.M.
Vázquez, (HSS30844); La Hoya de Santa María a Puebla del Maestre,
29SQC51, 15-IV-2009, V. Moreno et al, (HSS42301).
Anacamptis longicornu subsp. longicornu
Algeria: Algeria, H.Poiret (P-COSSON 00420232) (Lectotype)
Anacamptis longicornu subsp. linkiana F.M.Vázquez
Hs: Badajoz (Ba): Retamal, desde Palomas, 30STH57, 16-III-2010,
M.Gutierrez & F.M. Vázquez (HSS44286).
Lu: Baixo Alentejo (BA): Between Melides and Grandola, Cork oak forest,
29SNC32, 04-IV-2015, L. Concepción, D.M. Vázquez & F.M.Vázquez
(HSS63881) (Holotype); Mértola, proximidades, zonas de esquistos, prados
humedos, 1-IV-2009, V. Moreno, F.M. Vázquez et al. (HSS41214); Santiago
do Cacem a Grandola, 38º02’59’’N 8º39’31’’W, 1-IV-2009, V. Moreno,
F.M. Vázquez et al. (HSS41268).
Anacamptis morio
Hs: Avila (Av): Hoyos del Espino. Los Terronales, 30TUK17, pastizales
1400msm, 27-V-2009, F. Márquez & F.M. Vázquez, (HSS42640); Becedas.
El Tremedal, 30TTK77, borde de carretera y pastizales con matorral aclarado,
1500 msm, 27-V-2009, F. Márquez & F.M. Vázquez, (HSS42624). Badajoz
(Ba): Los Santos de Maimona, camino de Usagre, 29SSQC36, cerros
calcáreos, 06-IV-2007, F.M. Vázquez, (HSS30660C); Alconera, Puerto de
Calatrava, 29SQC25, 700-500 msm, 16-V-2004, F.M. Vázquez, (HSS13731).
356 Journal Europäischer Orchideen 47 (2-4): 2015.
Cáceres (CC): Puerto de Tornavacas, 30TTK76, 1300-1500 msm, 06-V-2008,
D. García, Gutiérrez & F.M. Vázquez, (HSS38415); De la Garganta a
Candelario, prados de siega, 30TTK66, prados de siega sobre suelo granítico,
09-V-2006, J. Blanco & F.M. Vázquez, (HSS21652); ídem (HSS21665); La
Garganta, cerca de la pista de avellanos, 30TTK66, prados de siega, 08-V-
2007,D. García & F.M. Vázquez, (HSS33243); ídem (HSS33242); La
Garganta salida hacia Hervás, 30TTK66, matorrales y piornales, 09-V-2006,
J. Blanco & F.M. Vázquez, (HSS21592). Huesca (Hu): San Juan de la Peña,
proximidades del monasterio, 30TXN80, 10-VI-2008, M. Gutiérrez & F.M.
Vázquez, (HSS39179).
Anacamptis picta
Hs: Avila (Av): Becedas. El Tremedal, 30TTK77, borde de carretera y
pastizales con matorral aclarado, 1500 msm, 27-V-2009, F. Márquez & F.M.
Vázquez, (HSS42623). Badajoz (Ba): Badajoz, proximidades del Complejo
Deportivo “La Granadilla”,29SPD70, Pastizales, en suelos arenosos, 10-IV-
2014, F.M. Vázquez, (HSS63089); Oliva de Mérida a Palomas, km 7,5,
29SQC49, en matorrales de Cistus ladanifer L., 05-V-2007, F.M. Vázquez,
(HSS32741); Puebla de Alcocer, Sierra, 30SUJ01, 600-690 msm, 11-III-2008,
J. Blanco, D. García & M. Gutierréz, (HSS36700); Villar del Rey, Finca
Azagala, 29SPD83, brezales, 15-IV-2007, F.M. Vázquez, (HSS30972).
Cáceres (CC): Garganta la Serrá, 30TTK66, prados de siega. 1600- 2000 msm,
29-V-2007, J. Blanco, M. Gutiérrez & F.M. Vázquez, (HSS34391); Barrado,
proximidades del Roble de la Solana, 30TTK54, melojar, 27-III-2008, D.
García, M. Gutiérrez & F. Márquez, (HSS37364). Salamanca (Sa): Límite
provincial con Cáceres. Ctra. Valverde del Fresno a Ciudad Rodrigo,
29TPE85, prados cacuminales, 22-VI-2006, D. García, S. Ramos & F.M.
Vázquez, (HSS26493).
Anacamptis×heraclea
Ga: Var: Massif des Maures, sur le sommant des collines qui dominant
Covalain, praides humides, siliceus, 450 m, 24-V-1905 et 27-V-1906, L.
Verguin (P02101335 (Lectotype) and P02101336 (Syntype))
Anacamptis ×nicodemi
Ga: Alpes Maritimes: Nice, environs, V-1907, Mellerio (P02101352)
It: Verona: Bonifacio, terrains granitiques de Piantarella, 20-IV-1909, Stefani
(P02101347)
Anacamptis ×subpapilionacea nothosubsp. subpapilionacea
Hs: Badajoz (Ba): Almendral - Táliga, pastizales sobre sierras calcáreas, 24-
Journal Europäischer Orchideen 47 (2-4): 2015. 357
III-2007, F.M. Vázquez, (HSS30306); Los Santos de Maimona, Cerro de San
Jorge, 29SQC26, área de futura refinería. Encinares y retamales sobre suelos
básicos, 18-IV-2006, J. Blanco & F.M. Vázquez, (HSS19299); Sierra de San
Jorge, cerca del cortijo del Trevejano, 29SQC26, en olivares abandonados con
coscojas, suelos calcáreos, 18-IV-2006, J. Blanco & F.M. Vázquez,
(HSS19206); San Jorge de Alor, sierra de Alor, 29SPC67, en acebuches y
olivares abandonados, 27-III-2006, D. García, S. Ramos & F.M. Vázquez,
(HSS18383); Los Santos de Maimona, afloramiento alcalino, 15-IV-2006, S.
García & F.M. Vázquez, (HSS28023); Fuente del Maestre, sierra de San Jorge,
10-III-2003, J. Blanco, A.B. Lucas & F.M. Vázquez, (HSS8841); Fuente del
Maestre, sierra Cabrera, 29SQC26, en matorrales seriales de tomillos y jarales,
520 msm, 18-III-2007, F.M. Vázquez, (HSS30069); ídem (HSS300070);
Valverde de Leganés, 29SPC78, sierra calcárea, 15-III-2008, F.M. Vázquez,
(HSS36903); Villafranca de los Barros, 29SQC37, olivar sobre suelos calizos,
18-III-2008, M. Gutiérrez, F. Márquez, S. Ramos S. Rincón & F.M. Vázquez,
(HSS36935); ídem (HSS36936); Alconera - Atalaya, 29SQC24, olivares
abandonados con Cistus albidus L., 07-IV-2007, F.M. Vázquez, (HSS30853);
ídem (HSS30848)
Anacamptis ×subpapilionacea nothosubsp. rebbasii
Hs: Badajoz (Ba): Badajoz. Cerro Gordo, proximidades Venta Don José,
29SPD80, Pastizales y zonas de matorral mixto (cantuesal- retamar) 160-18
m.s.n.m., 03-IV-2011, D. García & F. Márquez, (HSS48904); ídem
(HSS48903); Los Santos de Maimona, Cerro de San Jorge, 29SQC26, áreas de
futura refinería. En encinares y retamales sobre suelos básicos, 18-IV-2006,
J. Blanco & F.M. Vázquez, (HSS19298); Badajoz, cerro detrás de la Venta
Don José, 29SPD80, cerro calizo, 15-IV-2007, M. Fernández & D. García,
(HSS30970); ídem (HSS30971); La Hoya de Santa María a Puebla del
Maestre, 29SQC51, 15-IV-2009, V. Moreno et al. , (HSS42304); Badajoz.
Proximidades del Complejo Deportivo “La Granadilla”, 29SPD70, pastizales,
en suelos arenosos, 10IV-2014, F.M. Vázquez, (HSS63088);
Acknowledgements
We wish to thank R. Lorenz for his assistance in correcting the original
manuscript and the nomenclatural recommendations made that greatly
enriched the final text. Especially we thank the curators of herbaria Berlin,
Naples, Paris and Zurich for their help and assistance.
358 Journal Europäischer Orchideen 47 (2-4): 2015.
Literature
AEDO, C. (2005): Orchis L.- In Castroviejo, S., Aedo, C. & A. Herrero: Flora
Ibérica, Madrid. vol. XXI: 114-146. CSIC. Madrid.
AKHALKATSI, M., BAUMANN, H., LORENZ, R., MOSULISHVILI, M. & R. PETER
(2005): Beiträge zur Kenntnis kaukasischer Orchideen.- J. Eur. Orch.,
37(4): 889-914.
BATTANDIER, J.A. & L.C. TRABUT (1895): Orchis L. – In: BATTANDIER, J.A.
& L.C. TRABUT: Fl. Algerie 1(2): 26-31. París.
BAUMANN H., KÜNKELE, S. & R. LORENZ (1989): Die nomenklatorischen
Typen der von LINNAEUS veröffentlichten Namen europäischer
Orchideen.- Mitt. Bl. Arbeitskr. Heim. Orch. Baden-Württ. 21(3): 355-
700.
BAUMANN, H., KÜNKELE, S. & R. LORENZ (2006): Orchideen Europas. Mit
angrenzenden Gebieten.- Ulmer. 333 pp.
BOISSIER, E. (1842): Orchis morio L. var. longicalcarata Boiss.- In: BOISSIER,
E.: Voy. Bot. Espagne 2(19): 594. París.
BOUNEIRAS, M. & D. PRAT (2005): Les Orchidées de France, Belgique et
Luxembourg.- Parthenope Collection. 504 pp. Méze.
CAMUS, E.G. & A. CAMUS (1928): Iconographie des Orchidées d’Europe et du
Bassin Méditerranéen.- Paul Lechevalier ed. 559 pp. Paris.
CAMUS, E.G., BERGON, P. & A. CAMUS (1908): Monographie des Orchidées
de l’Europe, de l’Afrique septentrionale, de l’Asie Mineure et des
Provinces Russes transcaspiennes.- J. Lechevalier. Paris. 484 pp + 32
plantes.
DELFORGE, P. (2006): Orchis of Europe, North Africa and the Middle East.-
A&CB. 640 pp. London.
DELFORGE, P. (2009): Orchids et monophylie.- Natural. belges 90 (Orchid.
22): 15-35.
GUIMARAES, J.A. (1887): Orchideographia Portuguesa.- Bol. Soc. Broteriana
V: 17-84 + 241-258.
JULVE, P., & al., (2015): Chorologie departamental in Tela Botanica.
Anacamptis morio subsp. longicornu (Poir.).- http://www.tela-
botanica.org/bdtfx-nn-120633-repartition (cunsulte 23-v-2015)
KRETZSCHMAR, H., ECCARIUS, W. & H. DIETRICH (2007): The Orchid Genera
Anacamptis, Orchis, Neotinea. 2ª ed.- EchinoMedia. 544 pp. Bürgel.
LANDWEHR, J. (1977): Wilde orchideeën van Europa.- Vereniging tot Behoud
van Natuurmonumenten. S-Graveland. 575 pp.
LOISELEUR- DESLONGCHAMPS, M.J.L.A. (1827): Sur les plantes à ajouter à la
Flore de France (Flora Gallica).- Mem. Soc. Linn. París, 6: 398-432.
PICARRIELLO, O., DI FUSIO, N. & M. FRAISSINET (eds) (2000): Elementi di
biodiversità del Parco Nazionale del Vesuvio.- Napoli, Ente Parco
Journal Europäischer Orchideen 47 (2-4): 2015. 359
Nazionale del Vesuvio, 79-97.
REICHENBACH, H.G. (1850-1851): Orchidaceae.- In REICHENBACH, L.: Icones
Fl. Germ. Helv. XIII-XIV: 1-194. Lipsiae.
RIVAS GODAY, S. (1964): Vegetación y Flórula de la cuenca extremeña del
Guadiana.- Excma. Dip. Provincial de Badajoz. 777 pp. Madrid.
SOÓ, R. (1933): Orchis L. – In: KELLER, G. & R. SOÓ:- Monogr. Iconogr.
Orchid. Eur. 2: 129-260.
TENORE, M. (1820): Orchis nicodemi Cirillo ex Ten.- In TENORE, M.: Flora
Napolitana 1(2): 290, tab. 90.
TYTECA, D. & BERNARDOS, S. (2005): The Orchid-flora of Portugal.
Addendum n.5. Status of some rare species in Portugal and neighbouring
regions.- J. Eur. Orch. 35(3): 559-634.
TYTECA, D. (1997): The Orchid-flora of Portugal.- J. Eur. Orch. 29: 183-581.
TYTECA, D. (2000): The Orchid-flora of Portugal. Addendum n.3. Remarks on
Spiranthes spiralis (L.) Chevall., and three new taxa to the Portuguese
Flora.- J. Eur. Orch. 33(2): 291-348.
VÁZQUEZ, F. M. (2009): Revisión de la familia Orchidaceae en Extremadura
(España).- Folia Botanica Extremadurensis 3: 5-362.
VERGUIN, M.L. (1908): Orchidées nouvelles de la Provence.- Bull. Soc. Bot.
France 54: 597-604.
Address of authors
Francisco M. Vázquez; José Blanco, David García, Francisco Márquez &
María José Guerra.
HABITAT Research Group.
Dep. Forest Production and Biodiversity. CICYTEX.
06187. Guadajira (Badajoz)
Spain
Author correspondence: frvazquez50@hotmail.com
360 Journal Europäischer Orchideen 47 (2-4): 2015.
Fig. 4: Anacamptis longicornu subsp. linkiana F.M.Vázquez, Holotype, LU:
Baixo Alentejo: Between Melides and Grandola, Cork oak forest,
04.IV.2015, leg. L. Concepción, D.M. Vázquez & F.M.Vázquez (HSS 63881
single exemplar).
Journal Europäischer Orchideen 47 (2-4): 2015. 361
Fig. 5: Anacamptis ×heraclea (Verg.) F.M.Vázquez (A. picta × A. laxiflora),
Lectotype (P02101335), courtesy of MNHN collection Paris.
362 Journal Europäischer Orchideen 47 (2-4): 2015.
Fig. 6: Anacamptis caucasica var. albanica, Holotype, Z0000140 (with insert
of enlarged flower spike), Courtesy of Herbarium Univ. Zürich.;
Journal Europäischer Orchideen 47 (2-4): 2015. 363
Fig. 7: Anacamptis xnicodemi (Cirillo ex Ten.) F.M.Vázquez (A. morio
subsp. morio × A. papilionacea subsp. papilionacea), Holotype (TENORE, Fl.
Neap.: Tab. 90. 1820); Courtesy of Orto Botanico Napoli.
364 Journal Europäischer Orchideen 47 (2-4): 2015.
Fig. 8: Anacamptis caucasica (K.Koch) F.M.Vázquez, Holotype
(B100367508), Courtesy Virtual Herbarium Berolinense, Berlin.
