Emotional introspection is considered a key prerequisite for many psychological functions, such as emotion regulation. Emotional introspection can be defined as the acquisition of knowledge about a special kind of one's own mental states, that is emotions. In line with psychological and philosophical accounts of emotion and introspection we propose a model of emotional introspection. A main feature of our model is that emotional introspection can be conceptualized as an ability. Thus, we expect individual differences in the ability to introspect one´s emotions. Further, our model differentiates qualitative from quantitative emotional introspection. Qualitative emotional introspection refers to the process of acquiring knowledge about the quality of one's own emotions (e.g., anger, fear, hope, joy) while quantitative emotional introspection can be defined as the acquisition of knowledge about the intensity of one's own emotions (e.g., weak versus strong anger). In everyday life, statements such as “I am very angry” or “I am much less angry than yesterday” indicate the existence of quantitative emotional introspection. Up to date there are only few instruments that measure emotional introspection. Most of them are self-report scales from different fields like emotion regulation (e.g., DERS, Gratz & Roemer, 2004) or Alexythimia research (e.g., TAS-20, Taylor, Ryan & Bagby, 1986). In the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT, Mayer, Salovey, Caruso & Sitarenios, 2003) it is assumed that the ability of emotional introspection belongs or is closely related to the ability of perceiving emotions in general (e.g., in others, arts, objects). In our view, these measures put emphasis on the qualitative aspects of emotional introspection while neglecting the quantitative aspects.
We try to fill this gap by applying maximum likelihood difference scaling (MLDS; Maloney & Yang, 2003) that can be used to estimate individual scale values for a set of stimuli based on graded pair comparisons (e.g., Huber & Holbrook, 1982). Most importantly, MLDS provides a method to test whether the judgments of a participant fulfill the monotonicity axiom of a difference structure (Krantz, Luce, Suppes & Tversky, 1971). Hence, it is possible to check whether the obtained scale values can be regarded as interval-scale measurements. We suggest that the goodness of fit to the axiom is positively associated with the ability of quantitative emotional introspection. Therefore, we expect this method to be a compatible measure for quantitative emotional introspection. Additionally, this method can be regarded
as a maximum performance test in terms of Cronbach’s (1970) seminal distinction between
tests that are designed to determine what people usually do (i.e., self-reports measures,
assessing typical performance) and tests that are designed to determine what people can do at
their best (i.e., ability tests assessing maximum performance). Thus, our measure avoids
biases inherent to self-report measures. Preliminary data supporting our model will be
presented and further research ideas will be discussed.