A preview of this full-text is provided by American Psychological Association.
Content available from Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
jounal ofBcnonalny and Social Psychology
)q$i Vd 47. No. 6. II9I-IM5Copynjhi 1484 by itac
American Psychological Association. Inc
Empirical Validation of Affect, Behavior, and Cognition as
Distinct Components of Attitude
Steven J. Breckler
Johns Hopkins University
A prevalent model of attitude structure specifies three components: affect,
behavior, and cognition. The validity of this tripartite model was evaluated. Five
conditions needed for properly testing the three-component distinction were
identified. Two new studies were then designed to validate the tripartite model.
A consideration of the tripartite model's theoretical basis indicated that the most
important validating conditions are (a) the use of nonverbal, in addition to verbal,
measures of affect and behavior, and (b) the physical presence of the attitude
object Study 1, in which subjects' attitudes toward snakes were examined,
indicated very strong support for this tripartite model: The model was statistically
acceptable, its relative fit was very good, and the intercomponenl correlations
were moderate (.38 < r < .71). Study 2 was a verbal report analogue of Study 1.
Results from Study 2 indicated that higher intercomponent correlations occurred
when attitude measures derived solely from verbal reports and when the attitude
object was not physically present.
In discussions of the attitude concept, it is
very common to identify three attitude com-
ponents: affect, behavior, and cognition. The
present concern is with the validity of this
tripartite model of attitude structure.
Figure 1 suggests a useful way for concep-
tualizing the tripartite model. Attitude is
denned as a response to an antecedent stim-
ulus or attitude object. The stimulus may or
may not be observable, and can best be
thought of as an independent or exogenous
variable. Affect, behavior, and cognition are
This research was supported by a Graduate Alumni
Research Award and a Herbert Toops Research Award
(both to S. J. Breckler), and by NSF Grant BNS
82-17006 (to A. G. Greenwald). It is partly based on a
doctoral dissertation completed in the social psychology
program at Ohio State University. The article was written,
in part, while the author was a National Institute of
Mental Health Post-Doctoral Trainee in the Department
of Psychology at Northwestern University. Dissertation
committee members Thomas M. Ostrom and Robert C.
MacCallum provided helpful feedback during all phases
of the research. I am especially grateful to my advisor,
Anthony G. Greenwald, and to Anthony R. Pratkams,
both of whom contributed in every way possible to this
work. I also thank Thomas D. Cook, Harry C. Tnandis,
and three anonymous reviewers for commenting on an
earlier draft of the manuscript
Requests for reprints should be sent to Steven J.
Breckler, Department of Psychology, Johns Hopkins Uni-
versity, Baltimore, Maryland 21218.
three hypothetical, unobservable classes of
response to that stimulus.
In the present view, affect refers to an
emotional response, a gut reaction, or sym-
pathetic nervous activity. One can measure
it by monitoring physiological responses (e.g.,
heart rate, galvanic skin response) or by
collecting verbal reports of feelings or mood.
Behavior includes overt actions, behavioral
intentions, and verbal statements regarding
behavior. Beliefs, knowledge structures, per-
ceptual responses, and thoughts constitute
the cognitive component.
A core assumption underlying the attitude
concept is that the three attitude components
vary on a common evaluative continuum (cf.
Allport, 1935). Affect can vary from pleasur-
able (feeling good, happy) to unpleasurable
(feeling bad, unhappy). Behavior can range
from favorable and supportive (e.g., keeping,
protecting) to unfavorable and hostile (e.g.,
discarding, destroying). Likewise, cognitions
or thoughts may vary from favorable to un-
favorable (e.g., supporting versus derogating
arguments).
History of the Tripartite Model
The affect-behavior-cognition distinction
is an old one. The trichotomy of feeling,
acting, and knowing as three facets of human
1191