EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Scenario planning is a key approach for exploring the longer term consequences of nature-society interactions, and are used to inform policy making about the potential risks, opportunities and trade-offs of different possible future pathways of change. Scenarios do not aim to forecast or predict the future, but rather to highlight how different potential futures may unfold and thereby assist in the formulation and implementation of policies and interventions. This assessment identified 355 scenario studies published since 2005 that have explored the future of biodiversity and Nature’s contributions to people (NCP) across Africa. The different scenario studies were clustered and compared in terms of five major alternative trajectories (or archetypes) of future change across Africa, respectively emphasising markets, policy reform, security (fortress world), and regional and local sustainability {5.1.1, 5.2.1, 5.3}.
For Africa as a whole, drivers related to population, urbanisation, consumption and natural resource use are expected to increase under all five major scenario trajectories assessed. Similarly, the impacts of climate change impacts in Africa are expected to increase under most scenarios (5.4, established but incomplete). However, substantial variation in all key drivers is expected between regions and different scenarios. The largest populations on the continent are expected under Fortress World scenarios, but remain largely rural with high direct dependence on natural resources, leading to sustained pressure on biodiversity and NCP. The lowest populations are expected under Policy Reform scenarios, and are expected to be largely concentrated in large urban centres. However, increased wealth, consumption and global trade under this scenario also leads to high demand for food and other resources across Africa {5.4} (established but incomplete).
Under most future scenarios, Africa is increasingly interconnected with the rest of the world through global markets and trade (established but incomplete). Connections between different subregions in Africa are also likely to increase. Consequently, decisions and activities elsewhere in the world and in different parts of the continent may increasingly affect human well-being, NCP and biodiversity across Africa (5.8, established but incomplete). Large-scale resource extraction by multi-national companies are expected to lead to land grabbing, increased conflict, displacement and migration under several scenarios (5.4.4; 5.8, established but incomplete). While global trade has the potential to catalyse further economic and social development in Africa, this assessment suggests that under many scenarios the primary beneficiaries are overseas markets and investors. In the longer term, ecosystem service provision and local food security in Africa may be undermined unless trade and the distribution of its benefits are carefully governed {5.8}.
The impacts of human activities are expected to result in further losses of terrestrial, freshwater and marine biodiversity, as well most reductions in many provisioning and regulating services across Africa (established, but incomplete). In the short-term, habitat loss through land-use change may have more severe consequences for biodiversity and NCP than a changing climate. Current protected areas across Africa are generally not well aligned with future climate-related range shifts of species, implying increased resource needs to meet conservation objectives in the future. Although there is variation in the level of water availability across different scenarios and regions, water stress in Africa is expected to increase under all scenarios, particularly in the southern African region. Similarly, pollination services and regulation of climate and storm protection in Africa are likely to decrease under most scenarios. On the other hand, terrestrial food production and energy provision through biofuels is expected to increase under most future scenarios {5.5}.
Increasing trade-offs are expected in the water-food-energy nexus. The increase in trade-offs is particularly pronounced under scenarios that emphasise economic growth (5.7; 5.8, established but incomplete). There are more opportunities for synergies under scenarios that emphasise sustainability and the adoption and enforcement policies that increase and modernise agricultural production and access (5.7 established, but incomplete). Under all scenarios, achieving the goal of eradicating hunger is unlikely without compromising water quality. Energy security and access is best met under scenarios that focus on
THE REGIONAL ASSESSMENT REPORT ON BIODIVERSITY AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES FOR AFRICA
300
mitigating the impacts of climate change through proactive climate action and efforts to enhance regional sustainability (5.4; 5.7, established but incomplete).
Overall levels of human well-being are expected to improve under most future scenario trajectories, but Africa continues to face unique challenges (established but incomplete). Poverty is generally expected to decline, but major pockets of poverty persist, particularly in rural areas. Equity similarly shows mixed results, with progress towards greater equity threatened by patchy development across Africa and asset capture by foreign companies. Health is not expected to improve significantly under most scenarios, though health concerns shift from lack of access to food and medicine to problems associated with modern lifestyles (e.g., diabetes, air pollution). Security and freedom of choice are only expected to improve significantly under very particular scenario conditions where global cooperation and African national governance align effectively {5.5}.
Alignment of the Agenda 2063 aspirations, Sustainable Development Goals and Aichi targets can facilitate interventions that achieve multiple transformative outcomes by linking the conservation of biodiversity and NCP with enhanced human well-being in Africa (established but incomplete). Scenarios that prioritise sustainable development trajectories, with strong regional integration, collaboration, proactive and inclusive governance, show the potential for avoiding dependencies and lock-in behaviours associated with scenarios where rapid exploitation of the natural environment for short-term gains are promoted. While all of the scenarios involve trade-offs, scenarios that involve the development of strong regional institutions and good governance offer the best options for maintaining ecological integrity in support of human well-being and sustainable development {5.7}.
There are currently clear gaps in the type and distribution of scenario studies in Africa, with some subregions – such as central, northern and western Africa – being particularly poorly covered (established but incomplete). Most of the studies assessed in this chapter have addressed future changes in southern Africa (37%) and eastern Africa (18%). Almost 50% of the studies focused on local scales, while 26% covered multiple countries, and 18% are part of global scenario exercises. Only 11% of the assessed studies were conducted at the national scale, which is arguably the most useful scale for decision-making. The majority of the studies (80%) have had a broad exploratory focus, with only 24% focused on assessing specific policies or interventions. Furthermore, most studies (46%) used existing scenario storylines from other (often global) studies to explore future impacts on biodiversity and NCP in Africa; only 14% developed new integrated scenario storylines (5.2.2, established but incomplete). Furthermore, the links between NCP and human well-being are not often explored in much detail beyond climate change impacts on disease vectors and livelihoods {5.5}.
Scenario studies in Africa are heavily biased towards modelling climate change impacts, and do not sufficiently incorporate broad stakeholder participation or indigenous and local knowledge (ILK). Only 12% of the studies assessed included a participatory approach, and only 3% integrated ILK to some extent. In contrast, modelling exercises have been widespread (90% of studies), but mostly focus on climate change impacts (60%). The main models used in African scenario studies are correlative models (48%), followed by process-based models (29%) and expert-based models (8%) (5.2.2, established but incomplete). There is a critical need to broaden the scenario approaches used in the region to better incorporate ILK and participatory approaches.
Concerted efforts are needed to mobilise financial resources and build the capacity of African researchers, policymakers and institutions to understand, carry out and use scenario analyses. Although over half (56%) the studies assessed included at least one African-based author, only 19% of the studies involved only authors affiliated with African institutions. South Africa is by far the most productive African country, contributing to 29% of all studies. However, there is very little collaboration between South Africa-based authors and authors from other African countries (section 5.2.2, established but incomplete). Existing regional and international expertise should be leveraged to train a wider set of researchers in the use of scenario methods, and in communicating outputs of scenarios to decision-makers (5.2.2, unresolved).