Content uploaded by Raminder Saluja
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Raminder Saluja on Jan 17, 2019
Content may be subject to copyright.
382 Cosmetic Dermatology® • JUNE 2007 • VOL. 20 NO. 6
Study
The application of topical agents to enhance
beauty has been practiced over the centuries.
The Egyptians are credited with the origina-
tion of cosmetics (ca 4000 bc) with their uti-
lization of mesdemet, a dark grey ore of lead.
They also applied green malachite (green ore of copper)
for color and definition.1
Over the years, many new emerging minerals and
botanicals have been used in cosmetics. Some, such as
lead oxide used in surma (also known as kohl) to line
the eyelids, proved to be toxic and were banned.2 Other
agents were found to have beneficial effects on the skin
and are used in makeup today. Therefore, which minerals
are beneficial, and which benefits do they offer?
Mineral makeup was first introduced to the public in
the 1970s and, over the past decade, has surged forward
as a leader in the cosmetics world. Its popularity is due
to its claim to rejuvenate and protect the underlying skin
while providing coverage and color to hide imperfections
and accentuate positive features. Synthetic dyes, preser-
vatives, perfumes, and fillers are avoided in the composi-
tion of mineral makeup, rendering it hypoallergenic. The
inert nature of minerals inhibits bacterial growth.
Minerals are milled, oftentimes triple-milled, into a
fine powder that blends well into skin without clogging
pores. Minerals are also used as a camouflage for contour
and pigment defects and as a transitional application
for postsurgical erythema.3 Mineral-based cosmetics are
sometimes called cosmeceuticals.4
Commonly used ingredients in mineral cosmetics are
listed in Table 1. Many different lines of mineral makeup
are now available, with various combinations of ingre-
dients. This study evaluates 2 of these mineral-based
cosmetic lines.
METHODS
Twenty subjects participated in a daylong study that con-
sisted of preapplication photography using a Canfield
Scientific Fuji S2 Pro digital camera and head restraint
(Figure, A). Each subject thoroughly cleaned her face with
Evaluation of Mineral Cosmetics
Raminder Saluja, MD; Gail Yosowitz, BS; Mitchel P. Goldman, MD
This single-center study was designed to evaluate the efficacy, coverage, durability, and comparability of
2 mineral-based facial cosmetic lines: DYG and Jane Iredale.
A cosmetic artist applied makeup from one of the cosmetic lines to each half of the faces of 20 women
who were blinded as to which product was used. The volunteers were then asked to go about their
usual daily routines. Each face was photographed before application, immediately after application, and
7 hours after application. Each subject evaluated the makeup on both halves of her own face using a
written questionnaire that assessed comfort, duration, and general satisfaction. Four evaluators who
were blinded as to the type of cosmetic applied to each side viewed photographs of the subjects and
used a 10-point scale to grade the durability and coverage of the cosmetic used.
The DYG product line was demonstrated to be comparable with, and in many cases better than, the
Jane Iredale line in terms of duration of application and patient comfort and satisfaction. Enhanced
efficacy was up to 20% higher with the DYG product line over the Jane Iredale line (P=.25). Both mineral-
based cosmetic lines were well tolerated.
Study
Dr. Saluja is Fellow, Cosmetic Surgery, Ms. Yosowitz is Research
Coordinator, and Dr. Goldman is Medical Director, all at
Dermatology/Cosmetic Laser Associates of La Jolla, Inc, California.
Funding for this study was provided by York-Goldman
Enterprises, of which Dr. Goldman is part owner.
Copyright Cosmetic Dermatology 2010. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, or transmitted without the prior written permission of the Publisher.
COS DERM
Do Not Copy
VOL. 20 NO. 6 • JUNE 2007 • Cosmetic Dermatology® 383
Mineral CosMetiCs
Ingredient Function
Vitamins
Vitamin E (alpha-tocopherol) Lipid-soluble antioxidant used to protect cellular membranes
from lipid peroxidation by scavenging free radicals and lipid
peroxyl radicals5
Vitamin C (L-ascorbic acid) Water-soluble antioxidant and cofactor for collagen synthesis; helps
regenerate the oxidized forms of alpha-tocopherol6-7
Vitamin A (retinol and retinyl palmitate) Retinoid function in maintaining epidermal differentiation and
growth, thereby increasing epidermal thickness8
Nicotinamide (niacinamide) B vitamin and derivative of niacin; anti-inflammatory and anti–acne
vulgaris actions9
Coenzyme Q10 (ubiquinone) An endogenous cellular antioxidant and mitochondrial electron
transfer protein that exerts an antioxidant effect, thereby counter-
ing UV damage10
Tea extracts (eg, green tea, black tea, Contain polyphenolic compounds that have significant antioxidant
and coloring tea) and anti-inflammatory activity11
Botanicals
Flavones (eg, rutin, quercetin [apples Polyphenolic structure that confers antioxidant, UV protectant, and
and blueberries], hesperidin, diosmin metal chelation properties
[lemons and oranges])12
Carotenoids (eg, astaxanthin, Chemically related to vitamin A, therefore, a natural retinoid;
lutein, lycopene) commonly found in tomatoes
Xanthones (eg, mangiferin [mango Water-insoluable antioxidant
plant], mangostin [bilberry plant])
Polyphenols (eg, rosmarinic acid Oxygen and nitrogen free radical scavenger
[rosemary], chlorogenic acid [blueberry
leaf], ellagic acid [pomegranate fruit],
oleuropein [olive leaf ], tea)12
Minerals
Titanium dioxide, zinc dioxide Have UV protectant effects; brighten and intensify color; give white-
ness and opacity to cosmetics4
Mica Adds luster and pearlescence; is resistant to UV light, heat, and
chemical attack; adheres to the skin
Calcium carbonate Absorbs moisture
Iron oxide, chromium oxide, ground lapis, Adds color to cosmetics
manganese violet, gold
table 1
Common Ingredients of Mineral Cosmetics
Copyright Cosmetic Dermatology 2010. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, or transmitted without the prior written permission of the Publisher.
COS DERM
Do Not Copy
384 Cosmetic Dermatology® • JUNE 2007 • VOL. 20 NO. 6
Mineral CosMetiCs
a gentle facial cleanser. Equal amounts of the 2 cosmetic
products, as determined visually by the cosmetic artist,
were then applied to each side of the face. Care was taken
to ensure that all applications were done by the same cos-
metic artist, using comparable product colors. All subjects
were randomized as to which side of the face received
which cosmetic. All 4 evaluators were blinded as to the
cosmetic used. Photographs of each subject’s face were
taken immediately following application (Figure, B).
Subjects were then asked to go about their daily rou-
tines and not retouch their cosmetics or blot or wash their
faces. Subjects were asked to return 7 hours later for more
photographs (Figure, C). At that time, they were also
given a satisfaction questionnaire to complete that asked
them to identify which side of the face felt more comfort-
able, was itchier, or seemed more irritated; which side of
the face had makeup that lasted longer; and which side
of the face had makeup that better covered pigmentation,
blotches, acne scars, and other imperfections.
Photographs of each subject before application, imme-
diately after application, and 7 hours after application
were then graded by 4 evaluators using a 10-point scale,
with 10 signifying perfect coverage and appearance and
1 signifying the least coverage and worst appearance.
Grading criteria of the makeup included appearance,
duration, and coverage. The subjects were asked to evalu-
ate 3 individual end points: (1) the number of hours of
perceived satisfactory cosmetic coverage; (2) coverage
rating (using a scale of 1–4, where 15poor coverage and
45ideal coverage); and (3) satisfaction (using a scale of
1–10, where 15very unsatisfied and 105very satisfied).
RESULTS
Both cosmetics were visually inapparent 7 hours after
application. (Figure, C). However, Jane Iredale makeup
was somewhat more persistent in both coverage and
duration (the number of hours of satisfactory coverage).
DYG makeup was found to be very similar in duration
and coverage to Jane Iredale makeup, outperforming it
in 3 subjects for coverage and in 2 subjects for duration.
The subject questionnaires yielded equal satisfaction with
both products and generally uniform scores (Tables 2
and 3).
DISCUSSION
Mineral makeup has increased in popularity over the
past decade. The appeal of mineral makeup is largely
due to the commitment of its makers to create a cos-
metic that not only provides coverage and color to
enhance features but is composed of natural ingredients
to help rejuvenate and protect the skin from UV light
and environmental pollutants.
Because of the variety of mineral cosmetics available, it
is hard for consumers to know which ones to choose. The
key is finding a product that provides effective coverage,
good duration of action, and an array of colors to match
a variety of skin tones. Consumers should also be familiar
with the different botanicals and minerals incorporated
into the cosmetics and their pharmacologic actions.
The DYG line of cosmetics uses triple-milled min-
erals that are noncomedogenic along with botanical
antioxidants to help rejuvenate and restore the skin
while highlighting and defining facial features. The
Subject before (A), immediately after (B), and 7 hours after (C) application of mineral-based cosmetics.
ABC
Figure Not
Available Online
Figure Not
Available Online
Figure Not
Available Online
Copyright Cosmetic Dermatology 2010. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, or transmitted without the prior written permission of the Publisher.
COS DERM
Do Not Copy
VOL. 20 NO. 6 • JUNE 2007 • Cosmetic Dermatology® 385
Mineral CosMetiCs
DYG JI Difference (DYG-JI)‡
Subject B LS ES PP O B LS ES PP O B LS ES PP O
1 8 6 9 8 8 7 5 8 8 8 1 1 1 0 0
2 9 5 9 9 8 9 6 10 9 9 0 -1 -1 0 -1
3 8 7 8 8 8 9 7 9 8 9 -1 0 -1 0 -1
4 7 5 9 6 6 7 5 9 6 7 0 0 0 0 -1
5 9 7 8 9 8 9 6 8 8 8 0 1 0 1 0
6 8 7 8 7 8 8 6 7 7 7 0 1 1 0 1
7 9 7 7 7 7 8 7 9 7 8 1 0 -2 0 -1
8 8 6 7 7 7 8 5 8 8 8 0 1 -1 -1 -1
9 8 5 7 8 7 8 5 7 8 8 0 0 0 0 -1
10 8 7 8 8 8 8 7 8 8 8 0 0 0 0 0
11 9 5 8 9 8 7 6 7 7 7 2 -1 1 2 1
12 8 7 9 7 8 8 5 8 5 6 0 2 1 2 2
13 8 6 9 7 7 7 5 8 8 7 1 1 1 -1 0
14 8 5 8 8 9 8 6 9 8 8 0 -1 -1 0 1
15 7 6 9 7 7 8 5 9 7 8 -1 1 0 0 -1
16 0 1 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 2
17 8 5 8 7 7 9 7 8 7 8 -1 -2 0 0 -1
18 8 7 8 8 8 8 7 9 7 7 0 0 -1 1 1
19 8 6 7 7 7 7 5 9 6 6 1 1 -2 1 1
20 7 5 7 6 6 8 6 7 6 7 -1 -1 0 0 -1
Mean 8 6 8 7 7 8 6 8 7 7 NA NA NA NA NA
SD 1.899 1.41 1.552 1.517 1.436 1.905 1.538 2.033 1.889 1.881 NA NA NA NA NA
Mean 25 45 30 30 20 20 25 35 10 45 5 20 -5 20 -25
percentage
P NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1.4924 .424 1.00 .289 .267
*Durability rating is based on a scale of 1 to 10, where 1=no apparent makeup coverage and 10=perfect makeup coverage.
†JI indicates Jane Iredale; B, blush; LS, lipstick; ES, eye shadow; PP, pressed powder; O, overall; NA, not applicable.
‡Significant percentage difference in favor of DYG lipstick (20%) and pressed powder (20%) was observed.
table 2
Durability (Staying Power) of Mineral Cosmetics
Applied to Each Half of the Face for 7 Hours*†
Copyright Cosmetic Dermatology 2010. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, or transmitted without the prior written permission of the Publisher.
COS DERM
Do Not Copy
386 Cosmetic Dermatology® • JUNE 2007 • VOL. 20 NO. 6
Mineral CosMetiCs
DYG JI Difference (DYG-JI)‡
Subject B LS ES PP O B LS ES PP O B LS ES PP O
1 9 8 9 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 9 8 9 8 8
2 8 8 8 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 8 8 8 8 8
3 7 6 7 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 7 6 7 8 8
4 8 8 8 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 8 8 8 8 8
5 8 8 8 7 8 0 0 0 0 0 8 8 8 7 8
6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7 8 8 8 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 8 8 8 8 8
8 7 7 8 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 7 7 8 8 8
9 8 7 9 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 8 7 9 8 8
10 8 8 9 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 8 8 9 8 8
11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mean 4 3 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 NA NA NA NA NA
SD 4.05 3.89 4.22 4.03 4.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 NA NA NA NA NA
Mean 15 35 25 15 15 20 45 30 35 25 -5 -10 -5 -20 -10
percentage
P NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1.00 .804 .55 .11 .29
*Coverage rating is based on a scale of 1 to 10, where 1=no apparent makeup coverage and 10=perfect makeup coverage.
†JI indicates Jane Iredale, B, blush; LS, lipstick; ES, eye shadow; PP, pressed powder; O, overall; NA, not applicable.
‡No significant percentage difference between DYG and JI cosmetics was obser ved.
table 3
Coverage (Ability to Cover Imperfections) of Mineral Cosmetics
Applied to Each Half of the Face for 7 Hours*†
Copyright Cosmetic Dermatology 2010. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, or transmitted without the prior written permission of the Publisher.
COS DERM
Do Not Copy
duration, coverage, and feel of this cosmetic line have
been demonstrated to be similar to the duration, cover-
age, and feel of the established Jane Iredale line. Future
studies will evaluate the antiaging effects of a variety of
mineral cosmetics.
REFERENCES
1. Mellor A. The history of cosmetics: a vanity fair. Available at: http:
//www.thehistoryof.net/the-history-of-cosmetics.html. Accessed
April 24, 2007.
2. Draelos ZD. Cosmetics. Available at: http://www.emedicine.com
/derm/topic502.htm. Accessed April 24, 2007.
3. Antoniou C, Stefanaki C. Cosmetic camouflage. J Cosmet Dermatol.
2006:5;297-301.
4. Pinnell S, Fairhurst D, Gillies R, et al. Microfine zinc oxide is
a superior sunscreen ingredient to microfine titanium dioxide.
Dermatol Surg. 2000;26:309-314.
5. Shindo Y, Witt E, Han D, et al. Enzymatic and non-enzymatic anti-
oxidants in epidermis and dermis of human skin. J Invest Dermatol.
1994;102:122-124.
6. Colven RM, Pinnell SR. Topical vitamin C in aging. Clin Dermatol.
1996;1:227-234.
7. Chan AC. Partners in defense, vitamin E and vitamin C. Can J
Physiol Pharmacol. 1993;71:725-731.
8. Kang S, Duell EA, Fisher GJ, et al. Application of retinol to
human skin in vivo induces epidermal hyperplasia and cellular
retinoid binding proteins characteristic of retinoic acid but with-
out measurable retinoic acid levels or irritation. J Invest Dermatol.
1995;105:549-556.
9. Shalita AR, Smith JG, Parish LC, et al. Topical nicotinamide com-
pared with clindamycin gel in the treatment of inflammatory acne
vulgaris. Int J Dermatol. 1995;3:434-437.
10. Chiu A, Kimball AB. Topical vitamins, minerals and botanical
ingredients as modulators of environmental and chronological skin
damage. Br J Dermatol. 2003;149;681-691.
11. Katiyar SK, Ahmad N, Mukhtar H. Green tea and skin. Arch
Dermatol. 2000;136:989-994.
12. Lahiri-Chatterjee M, Katiyer SK, Mohan RR, et al. A flavonoid anti-
oxidant, silymarin, affords exceptionally high protection against
tumor promotion in the SENCAR mouse skin tumorigenesis
model. Cancer Res. 1999;59;622-632. n
Mineral CosMetiCs
VOL. 20 NO. 6 • JUNE 2007 • Cosmetic Dermatology® 387
Copyright Cosmetic Dermatology 2010. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, or transmitted without the prior written permission of the Publisher.
COS DERM
Do Not Copy