Content uploaded by Nesma T. Aboulkhair
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Nesma T. Aboulkhair on Jan 04, 2016
Content may be subject to copyright.
Research Article Adv. Mater. Lett. 2016, 7(1), 13-16 Advanced Materials Letters
Adv. Mater. Lett. 2016, 7(1), 13-16 Copyright © 2016 VBRI Press
www.amlett.com, www.vbripress.com/aml, DOI: 10.5185/amlett.2016.6171 Published online by the VBRI Press in 2016
Nanoindentation shows uniform local
mechanical properties across melt pools and
layers produced by selective laser melting of
AlSi 10Mg alloy
Nicola M. Everitt*, Nesma T. Aboulkhair, Ian Maskery, Chris J. Tuck, Ian Ashcroft
Department of Mechanical, Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Nottingham,
University Park, Nottingham NG2 7RD, United Kingdom
*Corresponding author. Tel (+44) 115-8466496; Email: nicola.everitt@nottingham.ac.uk
Received: 14 September 2015, Revised: 21 November 2015 and Accepted: 05 December 2015
ABSTRACT
Single track and single layer AlSi 10Mg has been produced by selective laser melting (SLM) of alloy powder on an AlSi12 cast
substrate. The SLM technique produced a cellular-dendritic ultra-fined grained microstructure. Chemical composition mapping
and nanoindentation showed higher hardness in the SLM material compared to its cast counterpart. Importantly, although there
was some increase of grain size at the edge of melt pools, nanoindentation showed that the hardness (i.e. yield strength) of the
material was uniform across overlapping tracks. This is attributed to the very fine grain size and homogeneous distribution of Si
throughout the SLM material. Copyright © 2016 VBRI Press.
Keywords: Nanoindentation; additive manufacturing; aluminium alloy.
Introduction
Additive manufacturing techniques have recently been
gaining the attention of various industrial sectors to process
a wide range of materials. Fabricating metal parts using an
additive manufacturing approach can be done via a number
of techniques such as direct metal laser sintering (DMLS),
electron beam melting (EBM), and selective laser melting
(SLM). These processes are appealing for the flexibility in
manufacturing that they offer [1] besides enabling weight
reduction through various routes, of which topology
optimization and the use of lattice structures are examples
[2]. During SLM, a part is built in a layer-by-layer fashion
through metallurgical bonding between single scan tracks to
form a layer and layers to form the 3D bulk sample. A
schematic presentation of the process is shown in Fig. 1.
First a layer of powder with a pre-defined thickness is
deposited on a heated build platform that is then scanned
with a laser beam moving in the XY plane. After that, the
piston controlled platform is lowered and the first step is
repeated. These steps are successively repeated until the
full part is built.
There are several studies in the literature investigating
the process ability of various alloys using SLM such as Ti
alloys, stainless steels [3], Ni alloys [4] and Al alloys [5].
Al alloys are extensively used in the automotive and
aerospace industries and being able to successfully process
them using SLM is expected to further increase their
feasibility in the industry. The literature has demonstrated
the possibility of fabricating near fully dense parts from Al
alloys using this technology [6, 7] in addition to reporting
outstanding mechanical performance when compared to the
conventionally processed counterparts [8]. However, the
studies available in the literature are mostly concerned with
micro and macroscopic mechanical properties with little
attention so far to the local mechanical properties, i.e. at the
sub-micron level. From the authors’ perspective, the local
mechanical properties could be rich with information for
selectively laser melted materials, specifically Al alloys as
their processing develops a characteristically fine
microstructure [9].
Fig. 1. The principle of SLM.
This work differs from other in the literature in that it
used nanoindentation to explore the very local mechanical
properties of the SLM material, and can link this nano-scale
investigation to the detailed microstructure and chemical
composition. Knowledge of the homogeneity (or not) of
the mechanical properties of SLM material is necessary if
the full potential of the technique is to be exploited in
design of weight saving structures. The paper first
Everitt et al.
Adv. Mater. Lett. 2016, 7(1), 13-16 Copyright © 2016 VBRI Press 14
establishes the hardness map across the melt pool produced
below a single track, and then explores the differences
produced by multiple tracks side by side in a single layer.
Experimental
Material synthesis
The AlSi 10Mg powder was supplied by LPW technology,
UK. A complete characterisation of the properties of the
powder used in this study can be found in an earlier study
published by the authors [10]. AlSi 10Mg is a speciality
cast alloy widely used in the automotive industry. A cast
slab of AlSi12 was used as a substrate onto which the scan
tracks and layers were processed.
Fig. 2. Schematic of nanoindentation force/displacement data.
The single tracks and layers were produced using a
Realizer SLM-50, Germany. The thickness of the powder
layer laid down before a scan was made was 0.04 mm. The
laser power was 100 W and production was carried out
under an Ar atmosphere with oxygen content within the
processing chamber below 0.1%. The scan speed was
250 mm s-1 and the spacing between the tracks to produce
the layers was 0.05 mm. The hatch spacing 0.05 mm was
used as it was shown to produce sufficient overlap between
the scan tracks to yield a consolidated layer [6]. The single
tracks and layers were cross-sectioned and polished in
preparation for the nanoindentation experiments.
Characterisation
Nanoindentation was carried out on a MicroMaterials
Nanotest platform 3 (Micromaterials Ltd., Wrexham UK).
A diamond Berkovoich indenter (3 sided pyramid) was
used and the system calibrated using a fused silica
reference sample. The test procedure carried out in
accordance with ASTM E2546. In short, the load was
increased at 0.375 mNs-1 up to a maximum load of 7.5mN
and then unloaded at the same rate. A schematic is shown is
Fig. 2.
In order to map the local properties across the melt
pool(s) of the tracks or in the layers, indentations were
spaced every 10 µm within a row and 15 µm between rows.
Fig. 3(a) shows an example of an array spanning across an
individual melt pool and the cast substrate. In the work
reported here, 308 indentations were used for the single
track characterization, whilst 182 indentations were used in
the layer array. A Hitachi TM2020 scanning electron
microscope SEM equipped with an energy dispersive
X-rays EDX detector served to determine the distribution
of the chemical elements within the indented area.
1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
1 4
1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2
1 1
1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
2 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
1 2
1 1 1 1 1 2 5 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
1 1
7 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 3 3 2 2 2
1 1
1 2 1 1 1 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 2 3 2 2 1
1 1
1 1 1 1 2 3 3 2 2 3 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 1
1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 1
1 1
3 4 1 1 4 1 1 1 7 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1
1 1
1 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1
2 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 6 2 2 2 1 2 6 1
1 1
4 1 1 5 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 3 1 1 1 1
5 8
1 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1
3 1
0.7
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
8.3
Nano-hardness (GPa)
6
(a)
(b)
Fig. 3. (a) Array of indentations across the melt pool produced in a single
track (b) nanohardness map of that melt pool.
Results and discussion
Single track
The nanohardness of the melt pool of a single track was
found to be 2.21 GPa ± 0.01 (standard error). As
illustrated by the hardness map in Fig. 3(b) (and the small
standard error of the hardness value), the hardness of the
material in the melt pool is uniform with little spatial
variation. This contrasts with the hardness of the as-cast
structure of the AlSi12 alloy substrate with nanohardnesses
varying from less than 1 GPa to more than 8 GPa.
Specifically we have been able to link the high hardness to
the Si flakes (shown in red in the chemical composition
map in Fig. 4) with a nanohardness of 9 ± 1 GPa, whilst the
surrounding matrix in the as cast material microstructure
has a nanohardness of 0.97 ± 1 GPa.
Research Article Adv. Mater. Lett. 2016, 7(1), 13-16 Advanced Materials Letters
Adv. Mater. Lett. 2016, 7(1), 13-16 Copyright © 2016 VBRI Press
(a)
(b)
Fig. 4. (a) Chemical map of the melt pool beneath a single track and the
surrounding substrate material. (Red = Si).
(b) microstructure of the melt pool material.
The melt pool material shows a fine cellular-dendritic
structure of α-Al surrounded by inter-dendritic Si
(Fig. 4(b)). This characteristic microstructure has been
previously reported for selectively laser melted AlSi 10Mg
[11]. The high nanohardness and spatial uniformity of the
hardness can be explained by the very fine grain size and
uniform Si distribution which are all a function of the fast
cooling rate inherent in the manufacturing process.
Fig. 5. Single layer of SLM AlSi10Mg - Nanohardness map and the
indentation array from which it is produced. (Red dotted lines show the
location of the edge of the tracks).
Layer
Having examined the microstructure of a single track, and
also verified the power of nanoindentation to show up any
spatial variation in nanohardness, we can now investigate
any effect on the microstructure of each single track of the
subsequent heating/cooling (remelting) produced by the
next track. Fig. 5 shows the hardness map across a layer
composed of multiple tracks.
(a)
(b)
Fig. 6. (a) Etched microstructure of the SLM layer (b) chemical map of a
representative area.
The nanohardness of the single layer is remarkably
uniform, with no signs of spatial variation at the edge of the
tracks (melt pool boundaries). The average nanohardness
of the single layer is 2.25 GPa (±0.02 standard error). The
uniformity is perhaps surprising given the coarser
microstructure which can be seen at the melt pool
boundaries where the most secondary heating has taken
place (Fig. 6(a)). However the grain structure is still fine,
and, more importantly, the Si is still homogenously
distributed and has not redistributed to form the flakes seen
in the as cast structure. For the investigated combination of
processing parameters, the average nano-hardness within
the single track was comparable to the single layer,
supporting the observation that re-melting had no
significant effect on altering the local mechanical
properties.
Conclusion
Selective laser melting of AlSi10Mg produced a cellular-
dendritic ultra-fine-grained microstructure due to rapid
solidification. Nanoindentation was able to distinguish the
Everitt et al.
Adv. Mater. Lett. 2016, 7(1), 13-16 Copyright © 2016 VBRI Press 16
variation in microstructure of the as-cast substrate material.
A higher mean nanohardness was recorded for the SLM
melt pool and also across the surface of a whole layer
which both showed uniform local mechanical properties.
The uniform nano-hardness profile is attributed to the
extremely fine microstructure along with the good
dispersion of the alloying elements.
Acknowledgements
Funding is gratefully acknowledged from BBSRC (Everitt), EPSRC
(Tuck and Ashcroft), and a Dean of Engineering Scholarship, UoN
(Aboulkhair).
Reference
1. Osakada, K.; Shiomi, M. International Journal of Machine Tools
and Manufacture 2006, 46, 1188-93.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.01.024
2. Maskery, I.; Aremu, A. O.; Simonelli, M.; Tuck, C. J.; Wildman, R.
D.; Ashcroft, I.; Hague, R. J. M. Experimental Mechanics 2015, 55.
DOI: 10.1007/s11340-015-0021-5
3. Kamath, C.; El-dasher, B.; Gallegos, G.; King, W.; Sisto, A. The
International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2014,
74, 65-78.
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-014-5954-9
4. Carter, L. N.; Attallah, M. M.; Reed, R. C. at 'Proceedings of the
International Symposium on Superalloys ' 2012, 577-86.
5. Read, N.; Wang, W.; Essa, K.; Atallah, M. M. Materials & Design
2015, 65.
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.09.044
6. Aboulkhair, N. T.; Everitt, N. M.; Ashcroft, I.; Tuck, C. J. Additive
Manufacturing 2014, 1.
DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2014.08.001
7. Buchbinder, D.; Schleifenbaum, H.; Heidrich, S.; Meiners, W.;
Bültmann, J. Physics Procedia 2011, 12, Part A, 271-8.
DOI: 10.1016/j.phpro.2011.03.035
8. Kempen, K.; Thijs, L.; Van Humbeeck, J.; Kruth, J. P. Physics
Procedia 2012, 39, 439-46.
DOI: 10.1016/j.phpro.2012.10.059
9. Thijs, L.; Kempen, K.; Kruth, J.-P.; Van Humbeeck, J. Acta
Materialia 2013, 61, 1809-19.
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.11.052
10. Aboulkhair, N. T.; Maskery, I.; Ashcroft, I.; Tuck, C. J.; Everitt, N.
M. at '22nd world congress of photonics: Lasers in Manufacturing'
2015.
11. Aboulkhair, N.; Tuck, C.; Ashcroft, I.; Maskery, I.; Everitt, N.
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A 2015, 46, 3337-41.
DOI: 10.1007/s11661-015-2980-7