Purpose: to verify the rest and reaction time to fluent speech in fluent and stuttering adults. Method: 22 adults, divided in two groups: G1-11 fluent individuals; G2-11 stuttering individuals. The electromyography records were collected in two different situations: rest and reaction time to speech. Results: the groups were significantly different on rest, with higher scores on G2. Groups are not significantly different about latency and the muscle activity. There was a strong positive correlation between latency time and speech muscle activity only on G2. Conclusion: therapy procedures aiming adequate rest and favoring speech timing may promote fluency.