Content uploaded by Sanda Erdelez
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Sanda Erdelez on Dec 31, 2018
Content may be subject to copyright.
Potential for inclusion of information encountering within
information literacy models
Sanda Erdelez and Josipa Basic
School of Information Science and Learning Technologies, University of Missouri,
303 Townsend Hall, Columbia, Missouri, 65211, USA
Deborah D. Levitov
School Library Monthly, 3520 South 35th St., Lincoln, Nebraska, 68506, USA
Abstract
Introduction. Information encountering (finding information while searching for some other
information), is a type of opportunistic discovery of information that complements purposeful
approaches to finding information. The motivation for this paper was to determine if the current
models of information literacy instruction refer to information encountering.
Method. Through a literature search we identified five information literacy models popular in
the U.S. elementary and secondary school environment and evaluated their descriptions to
determine if they include information encountering. We relied on the literature sources that
provide initial descriptions of the information literacy models and the secondary literature that
discusses the application of the models.
Analysis. The analysis for the presence of information encountering first included independent
readings by the research team members, followed by a collective discussion of observations to
formulate the findings.
Results. None of the information literacy models included explicit reference to information
encountering or other types of opportunistic discovery of information; however, they all have
components that can accommodate this type of information behaviour.
Conclusions. Within each of the five analysed models there are stages where natural occurrences
of information encountering are possible and could be articulated for students. Additional
empirical research is needed about the impact of information encountering-enhanced models of
information literacy on the students' learning outcomes and instructional processes.
Introduction
Information literacy is an important life skill in modern society. For close to three decades,
information literacy models have provided pedagogical tools and learning strategies for teaching
students about the information research process. These models are used by teachers in many U.S.
schools, from kindergarten to high school, to guide the students through their research projects
and help them learn how to use library resources.
Information literacy models typically include a description of specific steps that the students are
expected to complete while conducting research. These steps provide useful scaffolding for
novice information seekers as they gain more search experience and learn how to address more
complex and time consuming research activities. However, the prescriptive simplicity of these
steps is criticized by some authors because it does not capture the opportunistic and exploratory
dimensions of research activities. For example, George describes the traditional methods of
teaching research as 'mechanical and dubiously precise' with no elements of surprise that are the
common characteristic of most satisfying and worthwhile discoveries (George 2005: 381).
Nutefall and Ryder (2010) have similar views regarding the impact of the imposed structure on
students' research writing, commenting that students who are too organized can become engaged
in identifying a list of arguments supporting predefined concepts instead of writing an
exploratory research paper.
Specific information activities depicted within information literacy models include concepts such
as identification of information needs, selection of information sources, information seeking and
information use, which have been traditionally the domain of human information behaviour
research. The predominant research theme in this field for the last fifty years has been users'
information seeking behaviour in various information environments. Based on this empirical
research, various models of information problem solving and information seeking processes have
been proposed in the literature, many of them having a noticeable similarity with information
literacy models. However, during the last fifteen years some information behaviour researchers
have become also interested in experiences of opportunistic information discovery that occur
naturally in the everyday information activities of many information users. The possibilities for
unexpected but important discoveries and insights are especially abundant in the online
information environment, which is often a primary resource for students' research projects as
well as the information context where they will live and work as information users after finishing
their formal education.
Both information literacy (as an applied discipline) and human information behaviour (as a
research field) have information seeking behaviour as a shared domain of interest. We believe
that there is also a conceptual connection between information literacy models and opportunistic
discovery of information, especially the experiences of information encountering (Erdelez 2005).
In the context of student research projects, information encountering refers to situations when
students search for information on one topic and come across information related to some other
topic of interest. As presented above, one of the goals of information literacy is to prepare new
generations of information users to use information effectively in an increasingly electronic
information environment. Through exposure to information encountering in information literacy
models, students could learn strategies for coordinating their search experience by attending to
opportunities provided in the information rich environment.
Based on the above insights, we decided to examine a selection of the most prominent
information literacy models for references to information encountering in a research process. The
paper first provides background information related to information literacy and opportunistic
discovery of information in human information behaviour research, with an emphasis on
information encountering. The next section explains the procedures for selection and evaluation
of information literacy models, followed by short descriptions of individual models and their
evaluation for presence of information encountering. The final section discusses the importance
of including information encountering in information literacy models and student instruction and
proposes future research on this topic.
Background
The term information literacy was coined by Paul Zurkowski in 1974 during his presidency at
the Information Industry Association (Eisenberg 2004). Since its then, the topic has garnered
widespread attention from many constituencies, such as information professionals, educators,
government committees, and the business sector. Since the late 1980s the focus of information
literacy has been on the knowledge and skills needed by students in the information
environments of the 21st century. This emphasis has emerged in response to the report, A Nation
at Risk, published by the U.S. Department of Education's National Commission on Excellence in
Education in 1983 that presented the declining state of education in the United States (National).
By the 1990s information literacy had become a term widely used throughout education on all
grade levels.
In 1996 the American Association of School Administrators published a report, Preparing
Students for the 21st Century, listing many skills that students need, including those relating to
information literacy (Uchida 1996). Among these skills were: critical thinking, reasoning, and
problem-solving skills; skills for using computers and other technologies; ability to conduct
research and interpret and apply data; and comprehensive reading and understanding skills. The
importance of information literacy was also recognized by the National Education Association,
which in its 1996 and 1997 resolutions included the statement that '…equity must be assured as
public education works to meet the critical need to prepare all students to become information
literate adults and responsible citizens' (National... 1996: 3).
The emergence of information processing models in the early 1980's preceded the educational
popularity of information literacy. The models, referred to often as 'research process models,'
were developed to help students in elementary and high school settings to acquire research
strategies, identify needed information, and structure their time while doing research projects
(Kuhlthau 1994). As the concept of information literacy evolved, these models emerged as tools
for assisting students in becoming information literate and in guiding them in an efficient and
effective manner through the problem-solving/research process (Callison 2002).
The Final Report of the American Library Association's Presidential Committee on Information
Literacy stated that in order to be information literate "… a person must be able to recognize
when information is needed and have the ability to locate, evaluate and use effectively the
needed information" (American Library Association 1989: 1). This definition is also the basis for
the Information Literacy Standards for Student Learning published in 1998 by the American
Association of School Librarians and Association for Educational Communications and
Technology. This document provides nine standards and twenty-nine indicators that support and
expand upon the three broad categories: information literacy, independent learning, and social
responsibility. In addition to these standards, various information literacy models became an
important part of the strategies established for teachers and library media specialists as they
attempted to integrate and address the concept of information literacy within the learning
objectives for their students.
In the academic research context, information literacy relates to the study of information seeking
and human information behaviour within the field of library and information science. Case
(2002) provides the following definitions of these concepts:
Information seeking is a conscious effort to acquire information in response to a need or
gap in your knowledge.
Information behavior encompasses information seeking as well as the totality of other
unintentional or passive behaviors (such as glimpsing or encountering information), as
well as purposive behaviors that do not involve seeking, such as actively avoiding
information (Case 2002: 5).
Wilson (1999) provided comparative summaries of several models of information behaviour and
information seeking behaviour that share many common characteristics with information literacy
models. However, while information seeking models are more theoretical and provide a basis for
hypotheses for further research, information literacy models (research or process models) are
oriented towards practical application in the educational setting.
One model that overlaps both theoretical and practical dimensions is Kuhlthau's Information
Search Process Model. This model has been used extensively in both information behaviour
research and in information literacy instruction. Wilson (1999) recognized similarities and
differences between Kuhlthau's model and several other models developed by Dervin (1983),
Ellis (1987) and Wilson himself. As Wilson (1999) points out, the difference between Kuhlthau's
model and Ellis's model is that the former addresses stages of information behaviour while Ellis's
model addresses characteristics of information behaviour. The elements of Kuhlthau and Ellis'a
models are complementary and create a natural conceptual connection between information
process models in information literacy and human information behaviour models.
Another similarity between information process models and information behaviour models has
been their focus on purposeful search for information. Over the last two decades, however, many
information behaviour researchers have recognized the importance of serendipity and various
forms of opportunistic discovery of information in human information activities (see, Erdelez
1997; Williamson 1998; Toms 2000; Foster and Ford 2002; Foster 2003; Heinström 2006;
Björneborn 2008; McBirnie 2008). With the proliferation of the Internet and the Web that
facilitate easy navigation and movement across various information resources, serendipitous
acquisition of information has also attracted research attention in the context of human-computer
interaction and the development of information systems, especially digital libraries (see, Beale
2007; André et al. 2009; Toms and McKay-Peet 2009).
Information encountering is one type of opportunistic discovery of information that is especially
relevant to the information research process in an educational context. The concept of
information encountering, introduced by Erdelez (1997) refers to situations where, during the
search for information on one topic, users accidentally find information related to some other
topic of interest. For example, while searching the online library catalogue for her science paper
on global warming, a student notices interesting images of igloos that she could use for her social
science poster.
Figure 1 depicts the functional components of an information encountering episode as identified
by Erdelez (2004). This episode is situated within the context of a foreground information search
task (e.g., student's search for information on global warming) and is interrupted by noticing
information relevant so some other, background task or interest, which is currently not actively
pursued (e.g., task to find the images of various types of human dwellings for the social studies
poster). The model assumes that information users in the course of their everyday lives have
many tasks that will require active information search at some future time.
Figure 1 illustrates a simplified, complete information encountering episode in which the user
notices the background information, stops the current search, examines the information for
relevancy, captures or saves it for future use and then returns back to the original search task.
However, in a natural information search process many different scenarios may play out. For
example, a student notices background information but does not interrupt the search to examine
it, or the student examines the information but skips the capturing step. The model also illustrates
the situation in which the user, upon capturing the encountered background information, returns
to the foreground task. In real-life information searching, especially in online information
environments, users often do not return to the search task they initially started and switch to the
encountered information as their new foreground search topic.
Figure 1. A model of information encountering (adapted from Fisher et al. 2005: 181)
Procedures
To evaluate information literacy models for the presence of information encountering, we
selected five established information literacy models that have been used in the U.S. elementary
schools and high schools. The following models were selected based on their longevity and
popularity in the literature:
Kuhlthau's information search process (1985, 1989)
Eisenberg and Berkowitz' the Big6™ (1988, 1990)
Stripling and Pitts' research process model (1988)
Pappas and Tepe's pathways to knowledge model (1997)
Jamie McKenzie's research cycle (2000)
These models were selected for evaluation not only because of their prominence but also because
of their mutual differences and unique characteristics. For example, Kuhlthau's model serves as
the basis for all other models because of the extensive research that the author has conducted in
elementary and high-school settings. Unlike others' models, Kuhlthau's model includes
researcher's feelings during the research process. The Big6TM is probably the most widely used
model in schools in the USA and has an emphasis on student's real-time information problem
solving. Stripling and Pitts' model focuses on 'making sense out of information' through
reflection and engagement in critical, high-order thinking throughout the process (Veltze 2003:
19). The Pappas and Tepe model focuses on articulating the complexities and nonlinear nature of
the search process. Finally, McKenzie's model was included because it emphasizes the use of
technology in the research process.
We examined the above models by consulting both the original sources of their publication and
the secondary literature. The first level of evaluation focused on descriptive characteristics of the
models, such as: 1) the components of the model and 2) the context of its application. The
second level of evaluation addressed the analysis of the models' content for the presence of
information encountering, especially in the form of tactics that involve the functional elements of
information encountering model (Figure 1) as described by Erdelez (2005): noticing, stopping,
examining, storing and use of encountered information, followed by returning to the original
search task. If the model did not provide either an explicit or implicit reference to information
encountering, we tried to identify where this behaviour could be accommodated within the model.
The following section summarizes the key structural elements of each model and presents our
findings about inclusion of information encountering. For the reader's additional information,
references are provided for each model's source.
Descriptions of information literacy models and inclusion of information
encountering
The analysis revealed that none of the five evaluated models include explicit or implicit
reference about handling information that students may accidentally encounter in the research
process. However, we believe that each of the models can accommodate information
encountering and help students become more cognizant of handling such unpredictable
opportunities within the research process.
Kuhlthau's information search process
The information search process model is based in the philosophy of constructivist learning that
'involves the total person, the feelings as well as the thoughts and actions' (Kuhlthau 1994:7) and
prepares students to deal with an abundance of available information in a way that has meaning
and substance. The intent of the model is to help students understand the process of research, to
serve as a guide through a research assignment, and to assist in teaching information skills.
Kuhlthau emphasizes that the process was developed in response to a need in an educational
setting linked to an assignment or a project. She feels that the '…process approach gives a new
perspective to dealing with students' questions'. (Kuhlthau 1994: 7). The model involves seven
stages and recognizes the feelings that students experience and mood/attitudes that are important
for them to succeed at each stage. These feelings change from anxiety to confidence as students
move towards the final stages of the process. The key stages identified in the model are: task
initiation, topic selection, prefocus and exploration, focus formulation, information collection,
search closure, and start writing (Kuhlthau 1994).
An evaluation of Kuhlthau's model revealed that this model provides strategies (e.g., journaling
and note-taking) that students may use when gathering information. These strategies are applied
during Task initiation, Topic Selection or Information Collection steps of the model, and can be
used to make note of information that is accidentally located and that might relate to other
problems or areas of students' interest. By expanding journaling and note taking to include
information encountering, the information users can capture encountered information and save it
for later use. This activity is similar to so called serendipity-cards which, according to
Sawaizumi et al. (2007) externalize the serendipitous events from our brains, are 'small enough
to be kept in a pocket,' and can be easily used to record a serendipitous event in any situation
(Sawaizumi et al. 2007: 4).
The Big6™ skills
The Big6™ model was introduced by Eisenberg and Berkowitz (1998) as a problem-solving
process built on Bloom's taxonomy of cognitive objectives. It was promoted as a library and
information skills curriculum with an emphasis on critical thinking and information problem
solving rather than the more limited, traditional emphasis of location and access. Eisenberg and
Berkowitz referred to The Big6™ as a process 'to teach students the life-long skills needed to be
information literate' (Eisenberg and Berkowitz 1998: 99). The goal of The Big6™ was to
integrate information skills with curriculum content, focusing on real information needs of
students. The model was presented in six steps and specific skills were associated with each step
of the process: task definition, information seeking strategies, location and access, use of
information, synthesis, and evaluation. Even though the model is presented in a linear six steps,
the authors emphasize that process is not necessarily sequential and that the
researcher/information seeker often loops back through the previous steps.
The Big6™ model has potential to include information encountering in the steps of Task
definition, where students search for background information, and Location and access, where
students search for information related to their task. During both of these steps, the students are
exposed to information sources with a variety of content, which is conducive to opportunities for
information encountering. In each step students could be advised to be prepared for information
encountering experiences and taught about techniques for capturing and managing encountered
information. The emphasis of The Big6™ on the use of technology in a research process makes it
even more adaptable to information encountering, since many such accidental findings of
information involve the use of the Web. For example, common types of information
encountering on the Web are situations when useful information is encountered while scanning
the list of items retrieved by a search engine, whereas certain query features have more potential
for serendipity (Beale 2007; André et al. 2009;).
The Stripling and Pitts research process model
This model focuses on thinking and reflection during the research process and the need to use
and teach thinking skills: 'The thinking frame for research (which serves as a guide for how to
think rather than for what to think) is the research process' ( Stripling and Pitts 1988: 19). The
model was developed as a guide for research assignment projects planned for students from
kindergarten to twelfth grade (elementary and high-school). The emphasis on thinking and
reflection helps to avoid shallow and mundane research results that do not reflect what students
think about the research. It is a ten-step process and included within each step are teaching and
learning strategies with focused study and thinking skills, providing a guide for students to
follow when doing research. The steps are: choose a broad topic; get an overview of the topic;
narrow the topic; develop a thesis or statement of purpose; formulate questions to guide research;
plan for research and production; find, analyse and evaluate sources; evaluate evidence, take
notes and compile a bibliography; establish conclusions and organize information into an outline;
and create and present a final product (Stripling and Pitts 1988).
The Stripling and Pitts model may be adapted to include information encountering at the second
through the sixth level of its research taxonomy, when students are given responsibility for most
of the research process. These steps include the following activities: narrow the topic, find and
analyse sources, and evaluate evidence and take notes. Similar to Kuhlthau's model and the
Big6™ model, these activities expose students to diverse information sources and also involve
information recording techniques that could be easily applied to information encountering.
Pathways to knowledge model
Developed by Marjorie L. Pappas and Ann Tepe, in collaboration with the Follett Software
Company, this model is a holistic approach to information seeking and the research process with
an emphasis on constructivism and inquiry-based learning (Zimmerman et al. 2002). Although
similar to other models, this model focuses on the nonlinear, recursive nature of the process and
the supporting literature emphasizes the importance of teaching students that the process is
nonlinear (Pappas and Tepe 2002). Zimmerman and her colleagues (2002) also pointed out that
the real emphasis of the model is to help students think about the process. The basic pathways of
the model are articulated by the following stages: appreciation, pre-search, search, interpretation,
communication, and evaluation (Pappas and Tepe 2002). During appreciation, the phase unique
for this model, students appreciate, listen, sense, view, and enjoy information in the world
around them which stimulates their imagination, curiosity and motivation to learn more about a
certain topic. The stages of appreciation and evaluation occur throughout the process. The
information need and the learning style of the information seeker will impact upon the strategies
and pathways used to find and use information, making each undertaking unique (Zimmerman et
al. 2002).
Among the models we evaluated, the pathways to knowledge model comes closest to capturing
the environment that facilitates information encountering. Within this model information
encountering best fits in the appreciation stage, which includes students' recognition of the world
through information received in varied and different formats, such as natural settings, the Web,
books, video, music, paintings, and which can occur throughout the information seeking process
(Pappas and Majorie 2002). This phase is meant to 'foster curiosity and imagination' and
encourage the information seeker to 'explore any relationships between topic and other, related
ideas or concepts' (McKenzie 2000: 4). A high level of curiosity and imagination during the
appreciation stage may be the prologue to a discovery phase in information seeking activity;
therefore, students could become aware of accidental findings of information and should be
guided to use strategies learned in relationship to this stage to make note of such occurrences for
later use.
Research Cycle
Mckenzie's research cycle is a model that blends information literacy with the use of technology
to assist students in meaningful information seeking and use, taking them beyond fact-finding
(Milam 2002). At the heart of the research cycle are questioning skills that guide students to a
more demanding level of constructing their own learning. The model includes six steps: list
subsidiary questions; develop research plan; gather information; sort and sift; synthesize, and
evaluate. Students repeat these six steps many times as they research a topic, until they are
prepared to complete the seventh step, the reporting phase (McKenzie 2000). The focus of the
cycle is to engage students in thought provoking research that moves beyond topical to
meaningful problem-solving and decision-making research (McKenzie 2000). The questions
serve to guide the research, while the action of cycling back through the process forces students
to take and in-depth look at their subject and make discoveries and form opinions, creating their
own learning (McKenzie 2000). McKenzie emphasizes that technology makes 'word-moving'
even easier, students can just cut and paste, allowing them to gather facts without real thought
(McKenzie 2000: 5). The question-based research thus becomes essential to force students to
investigate and think about their subject of interest, rather than just report readily available,
predetermined facts.
McKenzie's research cycle could include information encountering within the model, especially
since students recycle through the phases. The phases that would especially support information
encountering are planning, gathering, and sorting and Sifting. Information encountering could be
addressed in these phases to help students understand such occurrences and be more cognizant of
handling such unpredictable opportunities within the research cycle. McKenzie's model provides
strategies that students use when gathering information in terms of storage and retrieval that
could easily be used to make note of information related to other problems or areas of their
interest that they accidentally find, and thus enabling them to return to this information later.
Table 1 provides a summary overview of all the models that were analysed. In each model,
specific stages or phases are identified with anasteriskx where teachers and library media
specialists could articulate for students the natural occurrences of information encountering and
suggest to them efficient strategies for managing encountered information.
Information
literacy model
Model components
Context
Kuhlthau's
information search
process (1984, 1989)
Task initiation*
Topic selection*
Prefocus and exploration
Focus formulation
Information collection*
A research process model
with emphasis on the
creative learning process
(elementary and high-school)
Search closure
Starting writing
Eisenberg and
Berkowitz's The Big6™
(1988,1990)
Task definition*
Information seeking
strategies
Location and access*
Use of information
Synthesis
Evaluation
A problem solving and
information seeking model
(elementary and high-
school).
Stripling's and Pitt's
research process
model (1988)
Choose a broad topic
Get an overview of the
topic
Narrow the topic*
Develop a thesis or
statement of purpose
Formulate questions to
guide research
Plan for research and
production
Find, analyse and
evaluate sources*
Evaluate evidence, take
notes and compile a
bibliography*
Establish conclusions and
organize information
into an outline
Create and present final
product
A research model for K-12
with emphasis on thinking
and reflection throughout the
process. Dependent on
aligning research with
various levels of thought
from simple to complex, e.g.,
fact-finding,
asking/searching,
examining/deliberating,
integrating/concluding and
conceptualizing.
Pappas's and Teppe's
pathways to
knowledge model
(1995)
Appreciation
Pre-search*
Search*
Interpretation
Communication
Evaluation
A model that articulates
complexities & nonlinear
nature of the information
seeking process K-12.
(Appreciation through
communication may occur
throughout the process)
Jamie McKenzie's
research cycle (2000)
List subsidiary questions
Develop research plan*
Gather information*
Sort and sift*
Synthesize
Evaluate
(Cycle through above
phases, possibly several
times) – and
Report
A research model that
emphasizes technology use
and information literacy skills
in elementary and high-
school education.
* marks phases in the model where information encountering may be incorporated
Table 1. Summary of information literacy models
Discussion
The major purpose of information literacy models is to help students successfully complete the
research process for specific assignments within a designated time-line. The models imply that
students will devote their research time to purposeful use of information sources, such as print
and online resources. Most of students' school-related information seeking will, therefore, occur
in the context of assignments and time-lines that do not promote pursuit of serendipitous
information. These task-driven characteristics of the learning environment may inhibit the
students' freedom to experience information encountering.
The current trends in education that promote standardization and elicit extensive control over
curricula, teacher behaviour and student learning (McNeil 2000) further stress the importance of
students' staying on task. In order to meet the requirements of the standardized curriculum, the
teachers will likely impose strict classroom management and supervise their students' behaviour
in relation to achieving the primary instructional objectives. Under these conditions, students'
experiences of information encountering may be seen as counterproductive and disruptive of
planned classroom activities.
In the elementary and high school setting, the research process is traditionally presented in a
goal-oriented, precise and often very step-wise fashion (George 2005) the better to help students
recognize the individual activities that can be linked to specific learned strategies. Over time,
however, changes in the level of students' sophistication emerge as they become more
comfortable with the research process and capable of dealing with the overall information
gathering activities it involves. The research process then becomes more intuitive and its phases
or stages more simultaneous. This change is reflected in the research taxonomy levels of
Stripling and Pitts and is also addressed by Foster (2003) who observed that experienced
academic and postgraduate researchers are capable of interdisciplinary information-seeking.
During this more natural process of research students are likely to experience situations of
opportunistic discovery of information and information encountering. By incorporating
information encountering into the current information literacy models, teachers could promote a
more holistic view of information literacy that would broaden students' awareness of naturalistic
research processes.
Through the investigation of five information literacy models, we identified stages or phases and
strategies that could lend themselves to the inclusion and recognition of information
encountering. As presented in Table 1, we believe that information encountering could be
incorporated into information literacy models without extensive alteration of the current
processes. The elements of the models particularly well suited for 'information encountering
enhancement' are the stages of the research process that involve information location and access
(e.g., task definition, topic selection, information collection and seeking, narrowing of the topic,
searching, gathering, sifting, and sorting). This enhancement of information literacy models
would raise the information encountering awareness by teachers, school librarians and computer
technology instructors who typically provide information literacy instruction and rely on the
models of information literacy as a major instructional tool.
Through information-encountering-enhanced information literacy models students will become
more aware of their own experiences with information encountering and will consequently need
to learn how to address these unexpected situations with effective information management
strategies. For example, students could be encouraged to make a written note of the information
they have encountered and its location (Sawaizumi et al. 2007); they could print out textual
information or store it in their personal folders on the school network; they could bookmark or e-
mail to themselves the URL for a relevant website; they could make a photocopy of a page with
relevant information, etc. These strategies would be especially beneficial when students are
learning about searching on the Internet and when using online databases and other library
resources that result in instances of information encountering. The state of technology
infrastructure in schools is, therefore, an important consideration when assessing the attention
given to information encountering in educational settings. Lack of infrastructure supporting
technology-ease in terms of access to servers for storing information, email accounts for students,
high speed Internet access and provision for online database access creates barriers for rewarding
students' information encountering experiences in an electronic environment. However, as the
state of school technology becomes more established and reliable, it will support the integration
of the concept of information encountering into the information literacy agenda. Ultimately, the
integration of information encountering strategies within information literacy in electronic and
other types of information environments can extend beyond school-related activities to life-long
learning, which is an ongoing process useful for personal, professional, or educational
information needs.
Conclusion
Our investigation of information literacy models revealed that they do not address the concept of
information encountering. One contributing factor is that the models were developed before
information encountering and opportunistic discovery of information emerged as recognized
concepts in the study of human information behaviour. Also, these models were developed to
support purposeful information seeking, usually related to an assignment that is content-based
within the educational curriculum.
Based on the analysis of five information literacy models, we believe that within each model are
various stages or phases where natural occurrences of information encountering are possible and
should be articulated for students. Acknowledging the need for teaching information
encountering strategies in educational settings lends support to the philosophy behind the
information literacy models that encourages students' experiences with multiple research
strategies and promotes alignment of these strategies with, what McBirnie (2008) calls learners'
self-taught search skills.
Based on the research-based understanding of opportunistic discovery of information as a
concept in human information behaviour we believe that information encountering provides
another dimension of information literacy that could be incorporated into the information literacy
models. However, educators (e.g., classroom teachers, technology specialists and library media
specialists) would need to have clear understanding of expected benefits and potential drawbacks
of making adjustments to present instructional strategies for information encountering to become
part of information literacy instruction. Therefore, more empirical research is needed to address
questions such as:
How does information literacy instruction without students' introduction to information
encountering compare to instruction with information encountering in terms of
measurable student learning outcomes?
What is the impact of inclusion of information encountering in information literacy
instruction on the various aspects of teachers' classroom management?
Does maturity of the student make a difference in their ability to address information
encountering experiences without thwarting the demands of the immediate assignment or
task?
What strategies should be introduced to teach students how to efficiently manage
information encountering in various stages of research process models?
Additional research will strengthen further connections between information behaviour research
and information literacy instruction and will also provide a more complete understanding of the
potential role information encountering in this instruction. Based on the research findings,
specific instructional strategies can be developed to enhance current information literacy models,
contributing to emergence of more holistic information literacy.
About the authors
Sanda Erdelez is an Associate Professor at the School of Information Science and Learning
Technologies, at University of Missouri, USA and an Associate Director at Missouri Informatics
Institute. She is the founding director of the Information Experience Laboratory at University of
Missouri and co-editor of Theories of Information Behavior (2005) published by Information
Today. Her research interest is human information behaviour, usability of information systems
and opportunistic discovery of information. Dr. Erdelez can be reached at:
erdelezs@missouri.edu
Josipa Basic is a doctoral student at the School of Information Science and Learning
Technologies at University of Missouri, USA. She works as a Research Assistant at the
Information Experience Laboratory at the same University. She received both Bachelor's and
Master's degree in Library and Information Science from the University of Zadar, Croatia. She
can be contacted at: jbyv7@mail.missouri.edu
Deborah Levitov is a Managing Editor for School Library Monthly, a magazine that supports
the school librarians in elementary and secondary schools in their efforts to strengthen their
students' information literacy skills, inquiry and the research process. She received her Ph.D.
from University of Missouri and can be reached at dlevitov@abc-clio.com.
References
André, P., Teevan, J. & Dumais, S.T. (2009). From x-rays to silly putty via Uranus:
serendipity and its role in web search. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference
on Human factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2033-2036.
American Library Association and the Association for Educational Communications and
Technology. (1998). Information power: building partnerships for learning. Chicago, IL:
American Library Association.
American Library Association. Presidential Committee on Information Literacy, (1989).
Final report. Chicago, IL: American Library Association.
Beale, R. (2007). Supporting serendipity: using ambient intelligence to augment user
exploration for data mining and web browsing. International Journal of Human-
Computer Studies, 65(5), 421-433.
Björneborn, L. (2008). Serendipity dimensions and users' information behaviour in the
physical library interface. Information Research, 13(4). Retrieved August 5, 2011, from
http://informationr.net/ir/13-4/paper370.html. (Archived by WebCite® at
http://www.webcitation.org/612MPhD2O)
Callison, D. (2002). Models (Part I). New Review of Information Behaviour Research,
19(1), 34-37.
Case, D.O. (2002). Looking for information: a survey of research on information seeking,
needs, and behavior. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Chung, J.S. & Neuman, D. (2007). High school student's information seeking and use for
class project. Journal of American society for Information Science and Technology,
58(10), 1503-1517.
Dervin, B. (1983, May). An overview of Sense-Making research: concepts, methods, and
results to date. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International
Communication Association, Dallas, TX.
Eisenberg, M.B. & Berkowitz, R.E. (1990). Information problem-solving: the Big Six
skills approach to library & information skills instruction. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Eisenberg, M.B. & Berkowitz, R.E. (1988). Curriculum initiative: an agenda and
strategy for library media programs. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Eisenberg, M.B., Lowe, C.A. & Spitzer, K.L. (2004). Information literacy: essential
skills for the information age. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
Ellis, D. (1987). The derivation of a behavioural model for information retrieval system
design . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Erdelez, S. (2004). Investigation of an opportunistic acquisition of information in the
controlled research environment. Information Processing & Management, 40(6), 1013-
1025.
Erdelez, S. (2000). Towards understanding information encountering on the Web.
Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 47,
363-371.
Erdelez, S. (1997). Information encountering: a conceptual framework for accidental
information discovery. In P. Vakkari, R. Savolainen & B. Dervin (Eds.), Information
Seeking in Context. Proceedings of an International Conference on Research in
Information Needs, Seeking and Use in Different Contexts, (pp. 412-421). London:
Taylor Graham.
Foster, A. (2003). A nonlinear model of information-seeking behavior. Journal of the
American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(3), 228-237.
Foster, A.E. & Ford, N.J. (2002). Serendipity and information seeking: an empirical
study. Journal of Documentation, 59(3), 321-340.
Heinström, J. (2006). Psychological factors behind incidental information acquisition.
Library & Information Science Research, 28(4), 579-594.
Kuhlthau, C.C. (1994). Teaching the library research process, 2nd Edition. London:
Scarecrow Press.
Kuhlthau, C.C. (1989). Information search process: a summary of research and
implications for school library media programs. School Library Media Quarterly, 18(1),
19-25.
Kuhlthau, C.C. (1985). A process approach to library skills instruction. School Library
Media Quarterly, 4(1), 31-44
McBirnie, A. (2008). Seeking serendipity: the paradox of control. ASLIB Proceedings,
60(6), 600-618.
McKenzie, J. (2000). Beyond technology: questioning, research and the information
literate school. Bellingham, WA: FNO Press.
McNeil, L.M. (2000). Cover story: creating new inequalities. Phi Delta Kappa, 81(10),
728-736.
Milam, P. (2002). Moving beyond technology with strategic teaching: Jamie McKenzie's
research cycle. School Library Media Activities Monthly, 19(4), 22-23.
National Education Association. (1996). The 1996-97 Resolutions of the National
Education Association. Washington, DC: National Education Association.
Nutefall, J.E. & Ryder, P.M. (2010). The serendipitous research process. Journal of
Academic Librarianship, 36(3), 228-234.
Pappas, M.L. & Tepe, A.E. (2002). Pathways to knowledge and inquiry learning.
Greenwood Village, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
Pappas, M.L. & Tepe, A.E. (1997). Pathways to knowledge: Follett's information skills
model (3rd ed.). McHenry, IL: Follett Software.
Sawaizumi, S., Katai, O., Kawakami, H. & Shoise, T. (2007). Using the concept of
serendipity in education. Paper presented at the KICSS 2007: The Second International
Conference on Knowledge, Information and Creativity Support Systems, Nomi, Ishikawa,
Japan.
Stripling, B.K. & Pitts, J.M. (1988). Brainstorms and blueprints: teaching library
research as a thinking process. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
Toms, E.G. (2000). Understanding and facilitating the browsing of electronic text.
International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 52(3), 423-452.
Toms , E.G. & McCay-Peet, L. (2009). Chance encounters in the digital library. In M.
Agosti, J. Borbinha, S. Kapidakish, C. Papatheodorou & G. Tsakonas (Eds.), ECDL'09.
Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Research and Advanced Technology
for Digital Libraries, Corfu, Greece, (pp. 192-202). Berlin: Springer Verlag. (Lecture
notes in computer science 5714)
Uchida, D. et al. (1996). Preparing students for the 21st century. Arlington, VA:
American Association of School Administrators.
Veltze, L. (2003). The Pitts/Stripling model of information literacy. School Library
Media Activities Monthly, 19(8), 17-21.
Williamson, K. (1998). Discovered by chance: the role of incidental information
acquisition in an ecological model of information use. Library & Information Science
Research, 20(1), 23-40.
Wilson, T.D. (2000). Human information behavior. Informing Science, 3(2), 49-55.
Retrieved 18 August, 2011 from http://inform.nu/Articles/Vol3/v3n2p49-56.pdf
(Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/612NUeUdv)
Wilson, T.D. (1999). Models in information behaviour research. Journal of
Documentation, 5(3), 249-269. Retrieved 18 August, 2011 from
http://informationr.net/tdw/publ/papers/1999JDoc.html (Archived by WebCite® at
http://www.webcitation.org/612NdQyEI)
Zimmerman, N.P., Pappas, M.L. & Tepe, A.E. (2002). Pappas and Tepe's pathways to
knowledge model. School Library Media Activities Monthly, 19(3), 24-27.
How to cite this paper:
Erdelez, S., Basic, J. & Levitov, D.D. (2011). "Potential for inclusion of information
encountering within information literacy models" Information Research, 16(3) paper 489.
[Available at http://InformationR.net/ir/16-3/paper489.html]
