ArticlePDF Available

Studies of West Palearctic birds: Turtle dove

Authors:
  • Royal Commission for AlUla

Abstract

The Turtle Dove Streptopelia turtur has declined, in terms of both range and abundance, throughout much of northern Europe over the last 30 years. Until recently, the species was relatively poorly studied in the modern agricultural landscape in Britain. Concerns over its conservation status prompted an intensive research programme to gather information on its breeding ecology, identify the causes of the recent decline and make recommendations to aid its recovery and conservation. Turtle Doves require tall, overgrown bushes for nesting and short weed-rich areas for feeding, but agricultural intensification has markedly reduced the availability and suitability of these habitats. Over the last 40 years, Turtle Doves have switched from foraging in 'natural habitats' to those created by humans, and their diet is now primarily seeds from cultivated plants. The number of chicks fledged per pair per year is today almost half that in the 1960s, while autumn migration has become significantly earlier. Many management options to help to conserve the species can be achieved within the current UK agri-environment policy framework.
58 © British Birds 98 • February 2005 • 58-72
ABSTRACT The Turtle Dove Streptopelia turtur has declined, in terms of both
range and abundance, throughout much of northern Europe over the last 30
years. Until recently, the species was relatively poorly studied in the modern
agricultural landscape in Britain. Concerns over its conservation status
prompted an intensive research programme to gather information on its
breeding ecology, identify the causes of the recent decline and make
recommendations to aid its recovery and conservation.Turtle Doves require
tall, overgrown bushes for nesting and short weed-rich areas for feeding, but
agricultural intensification has markedly reduced the availability and suitability of
these habitats. Over the last 40 years,Turtle Doves have switched from foraging
in ‘natural habitats’ to those created by humans, and their diet is now primarily
seeds from cultivated plants.The number of chicks fledged per pair per year
is today almost half that in the 1960s, while autumn migration has become
significantly earlier.Many management options to help to conserve the species
can be achieved within the current UK agri-environment policy framework.
Studies of
West Palearctic birds:
Turtle Dove
Stephen Browne and Nicholas Aebischer
Ray Scally
BB Feb 2005 21/1/05 1:07 pm Page 58
59British Birds 98 • February 2005 • 58-72
Studies of West Palearctic birds: Turtle Dove
23. Turtle Dove Streptopelia turtur,Austria, May.
Gordon Langsbury
The Turtle Dove Streptopelia turtur is a
summer migrant to Britain and Europe,
but perhaps most people in Britain
would associate the bird with the second day of
Christmas rather than high summer, thanks to
the popular carol The Twelve Days of Christmas.
This subversive, pro-Catholic hymn was sup-
posedly written at a time when it was illegal to
make direct reference to Catholicism, and the
‘two Turtle Doves’ are thought to represent the
Old and New Testaments. Historically, human
interest in the Turtle Dove was associated with
the bird’s faithfulness, and because it was an
emblem of hope and peace. The writings of
Saint Jerome (c. AD 320-420) and of Alain of
Lille, in his twelfth-century work The Complaint
of Nature, state that a Turtle Dove would not
seek another mate should its original partner
die. Indeed, it was thought that if a Turtle Dove
lost its mate then it too would soon die. It was
not until the eighteenth century that the species
became more noted for its migratory abilities,
being referred to in at least two of Gilbert
White’s letters. Today, however, most bird-
watchers in southeast England and much of
Europe would associate its purring calls with
warm summer evenings, rather than love or
peace. In recent years, the calls of this small,
attractive and once-common dove have been
heard less frequently and its population decline
and range contraction in Britain and
throughout Europe prompted The Game Con-
servancy Trust, with support from English
Nature and the World Wide Fund for Nature
(UK), to establish a dedicated research pro-
gramme focused on the species’ breeding
ecology. In this paper, we outline the biology of
the species based on the results of a number of
studies undertaken across Europe. We also
present the findings and recommendations of
our intensive four-year study, undertaken
between 1998 and 2001, to show how the
breeding biology of the species has changed
over the last 40 years.
Range and distribution
The Turtle Dove is a small, slim member of the
Columbidae, with a thin neck, a protruding
head and deep chest, giving it a pigeon-like
form, but with a long, wedge-shaped tail and
swept-back wings. The sexes are broadly similar,
but females are slightly smaller than males and
somewhat less brightly coloured. Four races of
Turtle Doves occur in the Western Palearctic,
with nominate turtur found throughout much
of Europe and western Asia. Slightly smaller
and paler, with more white on the belly, S. t.
arenicola occurs across North Africa (including
the Balearics) and into the Middle East. The
two remaining races are much more restricted
geographically, with S. t. hoggara (also smaller
and paler than nominate turtur, with broader
BB Feb 2005 21/1/05 1:07 pm Page 59
edging on the wing-coverts and on the tail)
inhabiting the central Saharan mountains, and
S. t. rufescens (more distinct than the other
races, being smaller and more richly rufous-
coloured) in Egypt and northern Sudan
(Cramp 1985; Gibbs et al. 2001). Both turtur
and arenicola are true migrants, spending the
winter (late October to late March) chiefly in
the Sahel region of Africa, roughly between
10°N and 20°N. The other two races are
thought to be sedentary or undertake only
small migratory movements (Cramp 1985).
In the breeding season (early May to mid
August), the range of turtur extends from the
Mediterranean to all but the most northern
areas of Europe. In Britain, at the northwest
edge of the species’ breeding range, it is a
lowland bird, favouring warm, dry conditions
and avoiding the higher ground and rainfall of
the west and north (Gibbons et al. 1993). Con-
sequently, Turtle Doves are concentrated in the
most intensively farmed, and now predomi-
nantly arable, areas of Britain.
Population trends in Britain and Europe
Survey and census work organised by the BTO
suggests that numbers of Turtle Doves in
Britain declined by 70% between 1968 and 1999
(Baillie et al. 2002), with a 25% contraction in
range between the 1968-1972 and 1988-1991
breeding Atlases (Gibbons et al. 1993). This
sharp decline commenced in 1979, following a
lengthy period of apparent increase and range
expansion from at least the mid nineteenth
century (Spencer 1965; Duckworth 1992; Hol-
loway 1997). Some local declines were apparent
from the 1950s (Goodwin 1989), but trends
from census work suggest that the period of
general increase lasted until about 1978/79
(Marchant et al. 1990). A few local studies
showed that numbers of Turtle Doves fluctu-
ated in a pattern similar to the national trend
(Hongell & Saari 1983; Miller 1992). From the
late 1970s, however, a sustained decline in the
breeding population in Britain became
apparent, and this continues today (Baillie et al.
2002) (fig.1). The decline has been so severe
that the majority of the British population is
now restricted to southern and eastern counties
of England and, by extrapolation from the
1988-91 census and subsequent rates of decline,
probably numbered only about 30,000 pairs in
2001. These population trends are of such
concern that Turtle Dove is now recognised as a
‘Red List’ species of conservation concern in the
UK (Gregory et al. 2002), and the UK Govern-
ment has placed it on the list of priority species
considered by the UK Biodiversity Action Plan.
One of the recommendations of the UK Species
Action Plan for the Turtle Dove is to undertake
an autecological research project to identify the
cause ofthe recent decline, in order to form a
recovery plan (Anon 1998).
This pattern of range expansion followed by
recent decline has been repeated elsewhere in
Europe, with evidence of local downturns being
noted from the 1950s onwards (Holzwarth
1971; Kraus et al. 1972; Cederwell 1978;
Hongell & Saari 1983; Bijlsma 1985; Yeatman-
Berthelot & Jarry 1995). Although census and
60 British Birds 98 • February 2005 • 58-72
Studies of West Palearctic birds: Turtle Dove
Fig. 1. Index of abundance of Turtle Doves Streptopelia turtur in Britain from 1963 to 1998, derived from
BTO Common Birds Census data.The index (solid line) and the 95% confidence limits (dashed lines) are shown.
63 65 67 69 71 73 75 77 79 81 83 85 87 89 91 93 95 97 99
CBC Index
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
BB Feb 2005 21/1/05 1:07 pm Page 60
migration data are often rudimentary or non-
existent, it is believed that, on a European scale,
the decline of the Turtle Dove occurred from
the mid 1980s onwards, particularly in western
Europe (Tucker & Heath 1994; Heath et al.
2000). Turtle Dove is now a Category 3 species
of European conservation concern (SPECs): a
species whose global populations are not con-
centrated in Europe, but have an Unfavourable
Conservation Status in Europe’ (Heath et al.
2000).
Previous research on the Turtle Dove
Until recently, the only major ecological study
of the Turtle Dove in Britain was completed in
the early 1960s (Murton et al. 1964; Murton
1968). In 1996, a pilot study was undertaken (by
The Game Conservancy Trust, funded by
English Nature) to collect basic information on
the ecology of the Turtle Dove and to test the
methodology for a more detailed study (Calla-
dine et al. 1997). The factors causing its recent
decline, in a modern agricultural environment
which has changed considerably since the 1960s
(Grigg 1989), and the stages of its life history at
which those factors operate, were therefore
unknown before a study undertaken by The
Game Conservancy Trust in the late 1990s
(Browne & Aebischer 2001; Browne 2002).
More widely, the breeding biology of the
Turtle Dove has been investigated in Bulgaria
(Nankinov 1994a, Nankinov 1994b), (the
former) Czechoslovakia (Pikula & Beklova
1984), France (Genard 1989), Germany
(Holzwarth 1971; Kraus et al. 1972), The
Netherlands (Bijlsma 1985), Portugal (Dias &
Fontoura 1996; Dias et al. 1996), Spain (Peiró
1990), Sweden (Cederwell 1978), and in the
southern Urals (Kotov 1974). Other studies
have looked at specific aspects of Turtle Dove
biology, including diet (Garzón 1974; Kiss et al.
1978; Jimenez et al. 1992; Dias & Fontoura
1996) and habitat requirements (Aubineau &
Boutin 1998). Turtle Dove migration was docu-
mented by, for example, Ash 1956, Rappe 1965,
Marchant 1969, Bourne & Beaman 1980,
Mountfort 1981, Genard 1989, Nankinov 1994b
and Aebischer 2002, and the biology of the
species on its wintering grounds in Africa by
Morel & Morel 1979, Morel 1985 and Morel
1987.
Migration
The Turtle Dove is the only British member of
the pigeon family to undertake a long-distance
migration, travelling up to 4,000 km twice a
year between breeding and wintering grounds.
The species’ annual migration, combined with
its exclusively granivorous diet, sets it apart
from all other farmland bird species in Britain.
After breeding, Turtle Doves begin to leave
Britain in August, with the last birds departing
61British Birds 98 • February 2005 • 58-72
Studies of West Palearctic birds: Turtle Dove
24. Turtle Doves Streptopelia turtur are found in a variety of habitats on their wintering grounds in western Africa,
including scrub, open woodlands,savannah and agricultural land;the open scrub with low-density cattle
browsing shown here (in The Gambia) would be a typical backdrop for encountering the species in winter.
Stephen Browne
BB Feb 2005 21/1/05 1:07 pm Page 61
in October and November. Their migration
route takes them through western France,
central and western Iberia, along the Atlantic
coast of Morocco, and through Mali and
Senegambia into western Africa. The main
migration period is between mid August and
late October, when most birds arrive in western
Africa. Migration is thought to be mainly noc-
turnal, but there is a diurnal component at
times (Guyomarc’h 1998). Turtle Doves tend to
migrate in groups of 5-30 individuals, but
flocks of over 100 are reported regularly; large
congregations, of up to 1,000, can occur in
food-rich areas, such as fields of ripe sunflowers
Helianthus (Aebischer 2002). Spring migration
commences during February-March, when
huge flocks of many thousands of birds can
occur in Mali and Senegambia (Curry 1974;
Morel & Morel 1979, 1988). Turtle Doves arrive
in Britain from mid April through to June, with
the main influx during May (see Aebischer 2002
for an overview).
In recent years, the autumn migration of
Turtle Doves in the UK has taken place eight
days earlier, on average, than in the 1960s
(Browne & Aebischer 2003a); concomitantly,
their breeding season is now some 12 days
shorter, on average, than 40 years ago (fig. 2).
For some bird species, it has been shown that a
recent increase in average temperatures, attrib-
uted to global warming, has altered the timing
of migration, but this relationship has not been
established for Turtle Doves (Tryjanowski et al.
2002; Browne & Aebischer 2003a) and it is
likely that factors other than temperature (e.g.
day length) may trigger the start of migration
for this species (Lofts et al. 1967). One conse-
quence of this lack of response in migratory
behaviour to increasing global temperature is
that, like some other migrant species, such as
Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca (Both &
Visser 2001), the timing of the Turtle Dove’s
breeding season and food supply may now be
asynchronous. Studies have shown that the
fruiting of various plants now occurs earlier, in
response to increasing temperature (e.g.
Walther et al. 2002), and it is possible that the
peak period of Turtle Dove breeding is now out
of phase with the peak in food availability, a sit-
uation which may have contributed to the
species’ decline in recent years (Browne &
Aebischer 2003a).
Hunting
Little accurate information is available on the
numbers of Turtle Doves taken by hunters (see
Boutin 2001). The Turtle Dove is a traditional
quarry species in many European countries,
particularly those bordering the Mediterranean,
and hunting is legal in seven EU countries in
autumn: Austria, France, Greece, Italy, Malta,
Portugal and Spain. All these countries operate
an open season, and although national or
regional legislation controls the exact opening
date of that season, EU regulations ensure that
this is not before 15th August. This prevents
resident breeding populations from being tar-
geted specifically, and it is primarily migrating
62 British Birds 98 • February 2005 • 58-72
Studies of West Palearctic birds: Turtle Dove
Fig. 2. Length of residence of Turtle Doves Streptopelia turtur in Britain during the period 1963 to 2000.
The values represent the difference between mean arrival and departure dates at six bird observatories in
south and east England. Redrawn from Browne & Aebischer (2003a).
63 65 67 69 71 73 75 77 79 81 83 85 87 89 91 93 95 97 99
Length of residency (days)
130
120
110
100
90
80
BB Feb 2005 21/1/05 1:07 pm Page 62
birds which are shot. A bag limit per hunter (i.e.
the number each hunter can shoot legally per
day) is set in Greece, Portugal and Spain. In
addition, Turtle Doves are hunted illegally in
France during the spring. Although accurate
data on the numbers hunted each year do not
exist, and estimates are difficult, the total
annual hunting bag for the EU is thought to be
of the order of 2-4 million birds (Boutin 2001);
it is not possible to assess the long-term trend
of the EU hunting bag. In Morocco, the esti-
mated bag is up to 140,000 birds, and because
the open season runs from mid June to early
August, most are of the race arenicola. Hunting
of Turtle Doves is not permitted in their win-
tering areas, and information is so limited that
the numbers of any taken illegally cannot be
estimated.
Overwinter ecology
Little is known about the ecology of Turtle
Doves on their wintering grounds (see Cramp
1985 for overview), certainly in recent times.
The overwintering range of the migratory
turtur and arenicola is thought to extend from
Senegambia and southern Mali south to the
Gulf of Guinea, and from the Atlantic coast
east to Cameroon and Nigeria. Although areni-
cola probably occurs in the east of this range,
with turtur in the west, there appears to be con-
siderable overlap. Both races are known to
occur in Senegal and Mauritania during winter.
They are found in a variety of habitats,
including acacia scrub, open woodlands,
savannah plains and agricultural land. Large
flocks have been recorded feeding on wheat
fields, harvested rice fields and on quaysides
where peanuts are being loaded (Barlow et al.
1997). They eat a wide variety of seeds from
wild and cultivated plants. Huge flocks, of up to
a million birds, most likely to be arenicola,have
been recorded at food sources, water and at
roost, typically in acacia scrub or waterlogged
woodland. Turtle Doves tend to drink at first
light or at sunset, when the largest congrega-
tions are usually seen. Although they appear
able to feed during the intense heat of the day,
they will take shelter in shade under trees and
bushes during extreme heat (Curry 1974); they
often associate with Vinaceous Doves Strep-
topelia vinacea while foraging or resting (Morel
& Morel 1988). Recent poor rainfall in the
Sahel, deforestation, scrub clearance and
improvements to agriculture in western Africa
are thought to have contributed to the decline
of the species (Marchant et al. 1990; Jarry
1995), although this is unsubstantiated by any
recent studies.
Habitat use on the breeding grounds
The habitat requirements of Turtle Doves away
from the nest-site have been little studied. In
general landscape terms, Turtle Doves occur in
a range of open lowland habitats which are
interspersed with hedges, scrub and small
woods (e.g. Kraus et al. 1972, Bijlsma 1985).
They avoid open areas such as heathland and
also large tracts of extensive woodland, but
occur in young plantations and managed
(thinned) woodland (e.g. Genard 1989). Turtle
Doves appear to favour warm areas, being
found in those parts of Germany where the
mean daily maximum July temperature is at
least 17°C (Kraus et al. 1972), and in Britain
where the equivalent temperature is at least
19°C (Norris 1960).
An analysis of30 BTO Common Birds
Census (CBC) plots showed that, by 1995, the
mean density of Turtle Doves was 0.8 territories
per km2on 15 farmland plots and 10.1 terri-
tories per km2on 15 woodland plots (Browne et
al. 2004). Browne & Aebischer (2004) recorded
farmland densities of 4.1-4.6 territories per km2
in Suffolk and 0.3-0.5 territories per km2in Lin-
colnshire. Densities of 6.5 territories per km2in
woodland and over 40 territories per km2in
63British Birds 98 • February 2005 • 58-72
Studies of West Palearctic birds: Turtle Dove
25. Turtle Dove Streptopelia turtur,
Austria, June 2000.
Olaf Lessow
BB Feb 2005 21/1/05 1:07 pm Page 63
scrub have been recorded in northeast Essex
(C. F. Mason pers. comm.). Other reported den-
sities for Turtle Doves in Britain are 1.4 territo-
ries per km2on farmland and 2.2 in woodland
during 1968-72 (Sharrock 1976); corresponding
figures of 0.6 and 2.6 territories per km2during
1988-91 (Gibbons et al. 1993); and 1.6-2.1 terri-
tories per km2on farmland in eastern England
(Mason & Macdonald 2000). Other studies
across the species’ breeding range have shown
that Turtle Dove density varies from 1.4 to 30.0
pairs per km2in a range of wooded and farm-
land habitats (Holzwarth 1971; Kraus et al.
1972; Bijlsma 1985; Genard 1989; Dias & Fon-
toura 1996).
In Britain, it appears that suitable woodland
areas support densities of Turtle Dove terri-
tories up to 6.5 times higher than on farmland.
This probably reflects the species’ propensity to
nest in overgrown bushes, with woodland areas
being used predominantly for nesting and the
arable areas for feeding. Studies by Fuller &
Moreton (1987) and Hinsley et al. (1995)
showed that use of woodland by Turtle Doves
was governed by nest-site selection. Turtle
Doves were associated with shrubby vegetation,
avoided dense woodland and did not hold terri-
tories in coppice woodland until five years after
coppicing, when mean tree height was 5.6 m
and canopy cover was 66%. Within woodland
habitats, Turtle Doves appear to favour scrub
rather than pure woodland stands (Mason &
Macdonald 2000). Woodland area is also
important, with the minimum required being
around 0.2 ha (Mason 2001).
On farmland, based on information
extracted from 15 farmland CBC plots, density
was related to the amount of suitable nesting
habitat on each plot (Browne et al. 2004). As the
length of hedgerow and length of woodland
and scrub edge decreased within farmland,
Turtle Dove density also decreased (fig. 3).
The home range of British Turtle Doves is
highly variable (on average occupying some
83.5 ± 23.9 ha at one site and 497.3 ± 22.5 ha at
another site), depending on habitat availability,
and ranging from 0.3 ha to 1,130 ha (Browne &
Aebischer 2003c). Information from radio-
tracking suggests that Turtle Doves choose their
territories in a non-random way. Cropped
arable habitats were avoided and wooded ones
most preferred, relative to availability. The latter
reflects the species’ behaviour of loafing near
the nest-site or in tall trees and hedges, which is
also where most territorial behaviour is con-
ducted.
Social behaviour
Turtle Doves are monogamous and may form
pairs which last for more than one breeding
season (Cramp 1985). Some pairs are formed
during migration but, in most cases, it would
seem that the males arrive on the breeding
grounds first, begin to deliver their continuous
purring calls immediately and attract females
quickly. Males generally call most frequently
early in the morning and in the evening, and
from favoured song-posts (Calladine et al.
1999). The calls may be followed by a display
flight, which is usually triggered by the arrival
64 British Birds 98 • February 2005 • 58-72
Studies of West Palearctic birds: Turtle Dove
Fig. 3. Relationship between the amount of suitable nesting habitat and the density of Turtle Doves Streptopelia
turtur on 15 BTO farmland CBC plots during 1965-1995. Redrawn from Browne et al. (2004).
-2.00 -1.50 -1.00 -0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00
Change in the availability of suitable nesting habitat
Change in Turtle Dove density
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
-0.05
-0.10
-0.15
BB Feb 2005 21/1/05 1:07 pm Page 64
of another Turtle Dove, apparently to further
attract females or discourage males. The display
flight consists of a steep, upward flight, with
rapid wingbeats producing wing-clapping, fol-
lowed by a long, slow, circular descending glide
with wing- and tail-feathers outstretched,
returning the bird to its original take-off point.
If joined by a female, the calling male will also
undertake a bowing display, in which he fluffs
out his feathers, particularly around the throat,
bobs his head up and down and takes small,
two-footed jumps towards the female.
Pairs tend to aggregate in suitable nesting
habitat and adjacent nests can be as close as 3 m
(Cramp 1985). Further nesting attempts are
made close to the first nest, often in the same
bush and occasionally on top of the old nest.
Breeding activities, including nest-building,
incubation and tending the young, are under-
taken by both parents, although the male
appears to take on more of these activities than
the female. During the breeding season, birds
tend to roost near their nests, although occa-
sionally they roost communally. Soon after
breeding, young and adults disperse and do not
form family groups. Consequently, Turtle Doves
are usually observed singly or in pairs on their
breeding grounds, although small flocks may
form around food sources.
Breeding ecology
The breeding season begins upon arrival on the
breeding grounds in late April, with the peak of
nesting activity being in early June. Turtle
Doves defend only a small area immediately
around the nest-site, but utilise a much larger
area for foraging. The size of these defended
territories around the nest ranges from 0.75 to
8.90 ha, and they contain a higher proportion
of woodland, grassland and other non-crop
habitats, and a lower proportion of cropped
habitats, than expected by chance (Browne &
Aebischer 2004). The majority of nests are
found in hedgerows and scrub, with some
within young plantations and woodland, and in
isolated bushes; most are in thorny bushes, but
also in conifers, elder Sambucus and fruit trees
(Browne & Aebischer 2004; Browne et al. 2005).
The nest is usually a small platform of thin
sticks, built by the female with the occasional
assistance of the male. Sometimes other mater-
ials, such as thin wire and plastic, are utilised
too.Many nests are built with climbers as an
integral part of the nest (Aubineau & Boutin
1998; Browne & Aebischer 2004), and it is
believed that these provide additional support
to the nest structure. Nests are usually 0.1-20.0 m
above ground level, the majority being 1-3 m
high (Browne & Aebischer 2004). Nest height
65British Birds 98 • February 2005 • 58-72
Studies of West Palearctic birds: Turtle Dove
26. During the breeding season,Turtle Doves Streptopelia turtur will use a range of open lowland habitats.
Most nests are found in hedgerows and scrub,with smaller numbers in young plantations and woodland,
and in isolated bushes. Nests are typically in thorny bushes,but conifers,elder Sambucus and fruit trees
are also favoured;dense woodland is generally avoided.This photo also shows the type of broad,
weedy-edge habitat which is important for feeding.
Stephen Browne
BB Feb 2005 21/1/05 1:07 pm Page 65
varies according to habitat; for example, nests in
conifers tend to be higher as the lower levels of
conifers are generally unsuitable. The majority
of nests are located within 1 m of the edge of
the bush or tree.
Clutches vary from one to three eggs, with
two being typical. Turtle Doves may produce up
to three successful broods in a season, but may
nest more than three times if a brood is lost and
a replacement clutch laid. Incubation is under-
taken by both sexes and lasts for 14 days.
Nestlings are cared for by both parents and
leave the nest after 15 days. Birds are able to
breed in their second calendar-year. About half
the eggs laid are successful, with the remainder
being predated, deserted or failing to hatch
owing to infertility (Murton 1968; Cramp 1985;
Browne & Aebischer 2004).
The likelihood of various outcomes of
modern-day nesting attempts is different from
that during the 1960s (Murton 1968; Browne &
Aebischer 2004). During Murton’s study, 6% of
nests were abandoned, 56% of nests were lost to
predation and 39% fledged young, compared
with 15%, 37% and 47% respectively during the
late 1990s. In other words, abandonment rates
were lower and predation rates higher in the
1960s, but in the 1990s hatching success was
higher, yet fledging success was lower. Overall,
the success of an individual breeding attempt
appeared to be approximately the same in the
1990s as in the 1960s.
In recent years, the breeding productivity of
Turtle Doves has fallen dramatically. In the
1960s, Murton (1968) found that, on average,
Turtle Doves laid 2.9 ± 0.1 clutches per year,
which produced on average 1.6 ± 0.1 fledged
young per pair. Today, each pair produces 2.1 ±
0.3 clutches and 1.3 ± 0.2 young fledge per pair
(Browne & Aebischer 2004). This decline in
productivity is a result of fewer breeding
attempts and is related to a contraction of the
breeding season (see above and fig. 2); for
example, in the 1960s, 24% of nesting attempts
were started in August compared with just 5%
during the 1990s (Browne & Aebischer 2004; fig
4). This, in turn, links in with the species’
markedly earlier autumn migration from
Britain (discussed above), and implies that the
reduced number of nesting attempts and earlier
cessation of breeding identified by Browne &
Aebischer (2004) is likely to apply on a wide
geographical scale. Furthermore, an analysis of
approximately 1,900 BTO Turtle Dove Nest
Record Cards has shown that there has been no
discernable difference in any aspect of the
species’ breeding ecology over the last 40 years
(Browne et al. 2005). It is clear that the reduc-
tion in the number of nesting attempts per bird
per year has caused the reduction in breeding
performance.
Diet on the breeding grounds
Early studies identified seeds from wild plants
(weeds) as the main component of Turtle Dove
diet, with seeds of locally cultivated crops
making up the remainder. The seeds from two
species, Common Fumitory Fumaria officinalis
and Common Chickweed Stellaria media,were
particularly important (Murton et al. 1964). In
66 British Birds 98 • February 2005 • 58-72
Studies of West Palearctic birds: Turtle Dove
Fig. 4. Proportion of nests started in each half-month period of the Turtle Dove Streptopelia turtur breeding
season in the early 1960s (black bars) and the late 1990s (white bars). Redrawn from Browne & Aebischer (2004).
May 2 Jun 1 Jun 2 Jul 1 Jul 2 Aug 1 Aug 2
% of nests started
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
BB Feb 2005 21/1/05 1:08 pm Page 66
areas where cultivated seeds were taken, this
usually coincided with harvest time. Today,
seeds from cultivated plants (chiefly wheat and
rape) are the main constituents of Turtle Dove
diet, and comprise, on average, 69% of the seeds
identified in the faecal samples of nestlings, and
60% ofthe seeds taken by adults (Browne &
Aebischer 2003c; fig. 5). Forty years ago, the
percentages were 23% and 5% respectively
(Murton et al. 1964). It is likely that these dif-
ferences are real and do not reflect different
methodologies.
The foraging behaviour of Turtle Doves is
now markedly different from that recorded in
the 1960s, when they fed predominantly on
clover leys, hay fields and stooked wheat
(Murton et al. 1964). Today, they feed in a range
ofdifferent habitat types, but principally those
which include spilt grain: in farmyards, animal
feed and non-arable habitats. In almost all
cases, birds recorded on crops are feeding on
the weed strip around the edge of fields, weedy
areas that sprayers have missed, on crops that
have limited herbicide use (e.g. daffodils) and
on stubbles after harvest (Browne & Aebischer
2003c). Recent changes in agricultural practices
have removed or reduced many of the feeding
opportunities available in Murton’s day. At the
same time, increased use of herbicides and fer-
tilisers and more efficient screening procedures
have greatly reduced the abundance and diver-
sity of weeds and weed seeds throughout the
farmed environment, compared with 40 years
ago (O’Connor & Shrubb 1986).
Turtle Doves not only utilise different habi-
tats for feeding nowadays, but also undertake
relatively large foraging trips. On average, Turtle
Doves travelled 0.5-1.5 km per trip during the
1990s, but some feeding sites were located up to
10 km from the nest (Browne & Aebischer
2003c). Such relatively long trips probably
reflect a lack of suitable feeding opportunities
closer to nesting areas.
The greatest influence on these dietary
changes is likely to be the spatial and temporal
availability of food during the breeding season.
The seeds from crops are generally most widely
available immediately before, during and after
harvest, at the end of the Turtle Dove’s breeding
season. Earlier availability is dependent on spilt
grain, which usually occurs during its transport
from storage. When cereal prices are high, farm-
based grain stores are emptied earlier than
during times when prices are low. Conse-
quently, in some years, spilt grain may be avail-
able to Turtle Doves during the breeding
season, in other years it may not, and this
depends solely on market pressures. Cultivated
seed availability is not only limited and variable
temporally, but also spatially. Whereas a weed-
rich farming landscape would provide food for
Turtle Doves throughout their home range,
there may be only one or two patches of spilt
grain across a wide geographical area, forcing
birds to travel large distances between nesting
and feeding habitats.
Reasons for the species’ decline in Britain
Habitat use and feeding ecology
Hedgerow and scrub removal has long been a
67British Birds 98 • February 2005 • 58-72
Studies of West Palearctic birds: Turtle Dove
Fig. 5. Proportion of weed seeds in the diet of adult and nestling Turtle Doves Streptopelia turtur in the early
1960s (black bars) and the late 1990s (white bars). Error bars show ±1 standard error. Redrawn from
Browne & Aebischer (2003c).
Adult Nestling
% of weed seeds in diet
100
80
60
40
20
0
BB Feb 2005 21/1/05 1:08 pm Page 67
feature of agricultural intensification (Pollard et
al. 1974; Barr et al. 1993), and remaining hedges
are often intensively managed. Most of these are
cut annually (Macdonald & Johnson 2000), cre-
ating hedgerows which are usually too low and
not wide enough for the Turtle Dove’s needs.
The territory distribution of Turtle Doves
appears to be linked to availability of suitable
nesting habitat, primarily bushes and trees in
scrub, hedgerows, woodland edge, etc. Both the
quantity and the quality of suitable habitat have
declined in the modern farming landscape.
As described above, Turtle Doves now
occupy relatively large home ranges, undertake
long foraging trips and make little use of
natural feeding sites, being much more depen-
dent on (for example) spilt and stored grain
and animal feed. The results from experimental
work suggest, however, that, at the local scale,
food provided by humans does not appear to
improve breeding densities or success (Browne
& Aebischer 2002). Diet has changed as well as
feeding behaviour, from weed seeds to culti-
vated seeds (in broad terms). Although it
appears that diet does not have a direct effect on
breeding success, it seems likely that all the
factors outlined here will combine to have a
detrimental impact on the species.
Breeding ecology
Our data suggest that the reduction in length of
the Turtle Dove’s breeding season means that
the number ofnesting attempts would now be
expected to be at least 20% lower than in the
1960s. The observed reduction in the number
of clutches each pair lays is 45%, from 2.9 in the
1960s to 1.6 in the 1990s. In turn, the number
of young that successfully fledge per pair has
dropped from 2.1 in the 1960s to 1.3 in the
1990s. This reduction in breeding output would
lead to a per annum decrease of approximately
17% in the British breeding population of
Turtle Doves if replicated throughout its British
range. The ultimate cause of the reduction in
breeding output is not known, but it is possible
that changes in the spatial and temporal avail-
ability of food and the associated shift in diet
may affect adult body condition. Birds may
struggle to achieve and maintain suitable body
condition throughout the breeding season and
as a result may finish breeding earlier, although
this remains unproven (Browne & Aebischer
2003b).
Hunting
The limitations of the available data make it dif-
ficult to assess the importance of hunting. For
example, a worst-case scenario, using the lowest
European population and highest bag estimates
(Hagemeijer & Blair 1997; Boutin 2001) and a
breeding productivity of 1.3 fledged young per
pair (Browne & Aebischer 2004), could predict
68 British Birds 98 • February 2005 • 58-72
Studies of West Palearctic birds: Turtle Dove
27. First-winter Turtle Dove Streptopelia turtur,Scilly, October 2003.
Gary Bellingham
BB Feb 2005 21/1/05 1:08 pm Page 68
up to 40% of the autumn population being
killed, but the comparable best-case scenario
(highest population and lowest bag estimates)
predicts that only 4% is killed. Until accurate
information on the numbers of Turtle Doves
being hunted is available, it is impossible to
make a scientifically sound statement on the
contribution of hunting to the decline of the
Turtle Dove.
Changes on overwintering areas
For some migrants that overwinter in sub-
Saharan Africa, population declines have been
linked with drought on the wintering grounds
(e.g. Winstanley et al. 1974, Cowley 1979,
Marchant et al. 1990, Peach et al. 1991).
Decreased rainfall, rising temperature and other
changes linked to desertification in the Sahel,
perhaps linked to global warming, may indeed
have important consequences for Turtle Doves
breeding in Europe. Nonetheless, the decline of
the Turtle Dove did not immediately follow the
severe drought of 1968/69, when many other
species that winter in the Sahel suffered a severe
population crash (Marchant et al. 1990).
Indeed, Turtle Doves increased during the 10-15
years following the 1968/69 drought, and it was
not until 1980 that the population began to
decline (Marchant et al. 1990). Unlike the
species that were badly affected by that drought,
the Turtle Dove is solely granivorous; it is pos-
sible that its food supply was less severely
affected and it may have adapted to become
more mobile, and exploit new food sources,
such as rice and peanuts, that arose from
improved agriculture in the region (Cramp
1985; Marchant et al. 1990; Barlow et al. 1997).
In addition, forest and scrub clearance in over-
wintering areas, for agriculture and to provide
fuel, has also been cited as a possible cause of
the Turtle Dove’s decline (Jarry 1994), particu-
larly through the removal of suitable roosting
sites. The impact of this is likely to be relatively
small, however.
Common factors causing Turtle Dove and other
farmland bird declines
Recent studies have highlighted a number of
ecological changes that have affected Turtle
Doves and other farmland species alike. The
loss of nesting habitat, primarily hedges and
scrub,is thought to restrict the territory distrib-
ution of Grey Partridge Perdix perdix (Rands
1986), Red-backed Shrike Lanius collurio (Van-
69British Birds 98 • February 2005 • 58-72
Studies of West Palearctic birds: Turtle Dove
28. Edge habitats are now crucial for Turtle Doves
Streptopelia turtur in the modern agricultural
landscape. During the breeding season, most birds
recorded feeding on cropped land are concentrated
on the strip of weeds around the edge of fields,
weedy areas that sprayers have missed,farm tracks
or on crops that have limited herbicide use.
Stephen Browne
hinsberg 2000) and Yellowhammer Emberiza
citrinella (Bradbury & Stoate 2000) as well as of
Turtle Dove. A reduction in breeding perfor-
mance, brought about by a falling number of
nesting attempts per pair, has consequences for
the population size of Song Thrush Turdus
philomelos (Thomson & Cotton 2000) and
Linnet Carduelis cannabina (Moorcroft &
Wilson 2000), as well as of Turtle Dove. The
decrease in food availability, attributable either
directly or indirectly to pesticide use, has been
shown to affect Grey Partridge (Potts 1986), Sky
Lark Alauda arvensis (Donald & Vickery 2000),
Red-backed Shrike (Vanhinsbergh 2000), Yel-
lowhammer (Bradbury & Stoate 2000) and
Corn Bunting E. calandra (Brickle & Harper
2000), as well as Turtle Dove. Such findings
make it difficult to separate the decline of the
Turtle Dove, and of many other farmland bird
species, from changes in land management
associated with recent agricultural intensifica-
tion, although the potential negative effects of
hunting and changes on the overwintering
grounds cannot be dismissed.
Conservation measures
The Turtle Dove UK Species Action Plan (Anon
BB Feb 2005 21/1/05 1:08 pm Page 69
1998) had the following objectives and targets:
In the short term, halt or reverse the decline
in numbers of the Turtle Dove by 2003 so
that the Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) index is
at least at 1996 levels;
In the long term, see a sustained recovery in
numbers so that the BBS index is at least
50% higher than 1996 levels by 2008.
The following recommendations will help to
deliver these targets in the UK. Although tail-
ored towards Turtle Doves, these are also likely
to help other farmland wildlife.
Management options
Nesting habitat
Turtle Doves have specific requirements for the
types of tree and bush in which they nest, and
management needs to recreate suitable
hedgerows and patches of woodland or scrub,
and ensure that intensively managed hedgerows
are restored and replanted. Hedges should be
allowed to become overgrown with climbers
and reach a minimum height of 4.5 m and
width of 3 m.
Food availability
Turtle Doves like to feed amongst short, sparse
vegetation with a predominance of seed-rich
weedy plants. Management needs to encourage
patches of arable plants and provide alternative
sources of seed. Within or adjacent to arable
fields, areas should be tilled annually each
autumn and receive limited herbicide applica-
tions (only those targeted specifically at perni-
cious agricultural weeds) to allow the
establishment of weed-rich areas, with low open
vegetation cover. Alternatively, or additionally,
such areas can be established by sowing seed
mixes. Existing herb-rich grassland should be
protected and managed for a late hay crop (cut
after 15th July). These grasslands should be
encouraged by de-intensifying the use of
improved grassland or by arable reversion.
Post-harvest cereal, rape and pea stubbles
should be left until at least the end of August to
allow good pre-migratory feeding. Supplemen-
tary food, such as waste grain or tailings, is best
provided close to suitable nesting habitat.
Policy options
The current framework of agri-environment
policies allows many of the conservation man-
agement recommendations for Turtle Doves to
be incorporated within modern agricultural
systems. Ongoing reform of the Common Agri-
cultural Policy, scheduled for 2005, should
encourage farmers to manage land in a more
environmentally friendly fashion. This will
allow the introduction of compulsory cross-
compliance, whereby a farmer receives agricul-
tural subsidy (e.g. Arable Area Payments)
conditional on compliance with environmental
standards; payments may be reduced or can-
celled if standards are not met. Future policy
also needs to address those areas which are cur-
rently not adequately covered, including the
widespread management of arable field
margins, the re-establishment of arable fields in
pasture-dominated areas, the planting and
management of scrub and the provision of sup-
plementary food.
Acknowledgments
The study undertaken by The Game Conservancy Trust
was funded by The Game Conser vancy Trust, English
Nature, WWF-UK and, in part, by The Habitat Research
Trust. We thank all landowners, farm managers and their
gamekeepers for allowing access to their estates and
farms. Alastair Burn, Julie Ewald, Jim Fowler, Phil Grice and
Becky Halahan provided useful advice during the study.
Mike Armitage, Sarah Coe,Victoria Edward,Abigail Knight,
Stephen Murphy, Lynsey Robinson, Blair Urquhart,
Nicholas Watts and Georgios Yfantis assisted with the
fieldwork. We thank all the BTO bird ringers, CBC and
Nest Record Card surveyors and bird-observatory staff
for their efforts over the last 50 years in collecting some
of the data used here. We are also grateful for help from
the Bird Observatories Council (BOC), in particular Peter
Howlett and Dick Loxton, and the BTO, in particular the
Ringing Unit staff, Humphrey Crick, John Marchant and
Richard Thewlis.
References
Aebischer,N.J.2002.Tur tle Dove Streptopelia turtur. In:
Wernham, C.V.,Toms, M. P., Marchant, J. H., Clark, J. A.,
Siriwardena, G.M.,& Baillie, S. R. (eds), The Migration
Atlas: movements of the birds of Britain and Ireland: 420-
422. Poyser, London.
Anon. 1998. UK Biodiversity Group Tranche 2 Action Plans.
English Nature, Peterborough.
Ash, J.S.1956.On the movements and survival of
Woodpigeons and Stock Doves. Brit. Birds 49: 298-305.
Aubineau, J.,& Boutin,J.-M.1998.L’impact des modalités de
gestion du maillage bocager sur les colombidés
(Columbidae) nicheurs dans l’ouest de la France. Gibier
Faune Sauvage, Game & Wildlife 15: 55-63.
Baillie,S. R., Crick, H. Q. P., Balmer, D. E., Beaven, L. P.,
Downie, I. S., Freeman, S. N., Leech, D. I., Marchant, J. H.,
Noble, D. G., Raven, M. J., Simkin,A. P.,Thewlis, R. M., &
Wernham, C.V. 2002. Breeding Birds in the Wider
Countryside: their conservation status 2001.BTO
Research Report No. 278, BTO,Thetford.
(www.bto.org/birdtrends)
Barlow, C.,Wacher,T.,& Disley,T. 1997. A Field Guide to
Birds of The Gambia and Senegal. Pica Press,
Robertsbridge.
Barr, C. J., Bunce, R. G. H., Clarke, R. T., Fuller, R. M., Furse,
M.T., Gillespie, M. K., Groom, G. B., Hallam, C. J.,
70 British Birds 98 • February 2005 • 58-72
Studies of West Palearctic birds: Turtle Dove
BB Feb 2005 21/1/05 1:08 pm Page 70
Hornung, M.,Howard,D. C., & Ness, M.J.1993.
Countryside Sur vey 1990. Department of the
Environment, London.
Bijlsma, R. G.1985.De broedbiologie van de Tortelduif
Streptopelia turtur.Vogeljaar 33: 225-232.
Both, C., & Visser, M.E.2001.Adjustment to climate change
is constrained by arrival in a long-distance migrant bird.
Nature 411: 296-298.
Bourne, W. R. P., & Beaman,M.1980.Tur tle Dove migration.
Brit. Birds 73: 232-233.
Boutin, J.-M.2001.Elements for a Turtle Dove (Streptopelia
turtur) management plan. Game & Wildl.Sc. 18: 87-112.
Bradbury, R.B.,& Stoate, C. 2000.The ecology of
Yellowhammers Emberiza citrinella on lowland farmland.
In:Aebischer, N. J., Evans, A. D., Gr ice, P.V., & Vickery, J. A.
(eds.), Ecology and Conservation of Lowland Farmland
Birds: 165-172. BOU,Tring.
Brickle, N.W., & Harper,D. G. C. 2000.Habitat use by
Corn Buntings Miliaria calandra in winter and summer.
In: Aebischer, N. J., Evans, A. D., Gr ice, P.V., & Vickery, J. A.
(eds.), Ecology and Conservation of Lowland Farmland
Birds: 156-164. BOU,Tring.
Browne, S. J. 2002. The Breeding Ecology of a Declining
Farmland Bird: the Turtle Dove Streptopelia turtur.
Unpublished PhD thesis, De Montfort University,
Leicester.
— & — 2001. The Role of Agricultural Intensification in the
Decline of the Turtle Dove Streptopelia turtur.English
Nature Research Report No. 421, Peterborough.
— & — 2002.The effect of supplementary feeding on
territory size,territory density and breeding success of
the Tur tle Dove Streptopelia turtur:a field experiment.
Aspects of Applied Biology 67: 21-26.
— & — 2003a.Temporal changes in the migration
phenology of Tur tle Doves Streptopelia turtur in Britain,
based on sightings from coastal bird observatories.
J.Avian Biol.34: 65-71.
— & — 2003b.Temporal variation in the biometrics of
Turtle Doves Streptopelia turtur caught in Britain
between 1956 and 2000. Ringing & Migration 21: 203-
208.
— & — 2003c. Habitat use, foraging ecology and diet of
Turtle Doves Streptopelia turtur in Britain. Ibis 145: 572-
582.
— & — 2004.Temporal changes in the breeding ecology
of Turtle Doves Streptopelia turtur in Britain, and
implications for conservation. Ibis 146: 125-137.
—, —,& Crick,H.Q.P.2005.Breeding ecology of Turtle
Doves Streptopelia turtur in Britain during the period
1941 to 2000: an analysis of BTO Nest Record Cards.
Bird Study 25: 1-9.
—, —,Yfantis, G., & Marchant, J. H. 2004. Habitat availability
and use by Turtle Doves Streptopelia turtur between
1965 and 1995: an analysis of Common Birds Census
data. Bird Study 51: 1-11.
Calladine, J. R., Buner, F., & Aebischer, N. J. 1997.The Summer
Ecology and Habitat Use of the Turtle Dove Streptopelia
turtur : a pilot study. English Nature Research Report
No.219, Peterborough.
—, — & — 1999.Temporal variations in the singing activity
and the detection of Tur tle Doves Streptopelia turtur:
implications for surveys. Bird Study 46: 74-80.
Cederwell, G.1978.Tur turduvan Streptopelia turtur
Öland. Calidris 7: 12-22.
Cowley, E.1979.Sand Martin population trends in Britain,
1965-1978. Bird Study 26: 113-116.
Cramp, S.(ed.) 1985.Birds of the Western Palearctic.Vol. 4.
OUP, Oxford.
Curry,P. J.1974.The occurrence and behaviour of Turtle
Doves in the inundation zone of the Niger,Mali. Bristol
Ornithology 7: 67-71.
— & Sayer, J.A.1979.The inundation zone of the Niger as
an environment for Palearctic migrants. Ibis 121: 20-40.
Devort, M.,Trolliet,B., & Veiga, J.1988.Sur la migration
postnuptiale de la Tourterelle des bois (Streptopelia
turtur turtur) en Gironde. Giber Faune Sauvage 5: 61-70.
Dias, S.,& Fontoura,A. P. 1996.A dieta estival da rôla-brava
(Streptopelia turtur) no sul de Portugal.Revista Florestal
9: 227-241.
—, Pereira,A.J.,& Fontoura,A. P. 1996.The art of capturing
doves: the past and the future of a traditional
Portuguese technique. In: Botev, N. (ed.),Proceedings of
the XXII Congress of the International Union of Game
Biologists:367-372. IUGB, Sofia.
Donald, P. F.,& Vickery,J.A. 2000.The importance of cereal
fields to breeding and wintering Skylarks Alauda arvensis
in the UK. In:Aebischer, N. J., Evans,A.D., Grice, P.V., &
Vickery, J. A. (eds.), Ecology and Conservation of Lowland
Farmland Birds: 140-150. BOU,Tring.
Duckworth, W. 1992. Decline of the Turtle Dove in the
Salford Area. Bristol Ornithology 21: 64-66.
Fuller,R.J.,& Moreton,B.D. 1987. Breeding bird
populations of Kentish Sweet Chestnut (Castanea
sativa) coppice in relation to age and structure of the
coppice. J. Appl. Ecol. 24: 13-27.
Garzón, J. 1974.Alteración en la conducta trófica de la
Tórtola Común (Streptopelia turtur). Ardeola 20: 362-
363.
Genard, M.1989.Contribution à la connaissance de la
Tourterelle des bois (Streptopelia turtur L.) en Gironde
(France): migration et nidification. Nos Oiseaux 40: 11-
24.
Gibbons, D. W., Reid, J. B., & Chapman,R.A. 1993. The New
Atlas of Breeding Birds in Britain and Ireland: 1988-1991.
Poyser, London.
Gibbs, D., Barnes, E., & Cox,J.2001.Pigeons and Doves:a
guide to the pigeons and doves of the world.Pica Press,
Robertsbridge.
Goodwin, D. 1983. Pigeons and Doves of the World. Cornell
University Press, New York.
— 1989. Decline of the Turtle Dove. Bristol Ornithology 20:
176-180.
Gregory, R. D.,Wilkinson, N. I., Noble, D. G., Robinson, J. A.,
Brown, A. F., Hughes, J., Procter, D., Gibbons, D.W.,
Galbraith, C.A.2002.The Population Status of Birds in
the United Kingdom, Channel Islands and Isle of Man:an
analysis of conservation concern 2002-2007. Brit. Birds
95: 410-448.
Grigg, D. 1989. English Agriculture – a historical perspective.
Blackwell, Oxford.
Guyomarc’h, J.-C. 1998. Bilan d’une recherche préliminaire
sur les comportements de la Tourterelle des bois
(Streptopelia turtur). Contributions à la Connaissance de la
Biologie de l’Outarde et de la Tourterelle des bois.
Convention de Recherche Ponctuelle Annuelle ONC – Univ.
Rennes-1 No. 97/27:1-10.Université de Rennes 1,
Rennes.
Hagemeijer,W.J.M.,& Blair, M. J. 1997. The EBCC Atlas of
European Breeding Birds: their distribution and abundance.
Poyser, London.
Heath, M.,Borggreve, C., & Peet, C. (eds.) 2000. European
Bird Populations: estimates and trends. BirdLife
International. BirdLife Conservation Series No. 10,
Cambridge.
Hinsley,S.A., Bellamy, P. E.,Newton,I.,& Sparks T. H. 1995.
Habitat and landscape factors influencing the presence
of individual breeding bird species in woodland
fragments. J. Avian Biol. 26: 94-104.
Holloway, S. 1997. The Historical Atlas of Breeding Birds in
Britain and Ireland 1875-1900.Poyser,London.
71British Birds 98 • February 2005 • 58-72
Studies of West Palearctic birds: Turtle Dove
BB Feb 2005 21/1/05 1:08 pm Page 71
Holzwarth, G. 1971.Ornithologischer Sammelbericht für
Baden-Württemburg. Anzeiger der Ornthologischen
Gesellschaft in Bayern 10: 174-182.
Hongell, H., & Saari, L.1983.A mixed pair of Collared
Streptopelia decaocto and Turtle Doves S. turtur in
Kokkola,W. Finland in 1978-79.Ornis Fenn. 60: 61-62.
Jarry, G.1995.Turtle Dove Streptopelia turtur. In:Tucker,
G. M.,& Heath,M.F. (eds.), Birds in Europe:their
conservation status:320-321. BirdLife International,
Cambridge.
Jimenez, R.,Hodar, J.-A., & Camacho, I.1992.La
alimentación estival de la tórtola común (Streptopelia
turtur) en el sur de España. Gibier Faune Sauvage 9: 119-
126.
Kiss, J.B.,Rekasi,J.,& Sterbetz,I.1978.Dati
sull’alimentazione di alcune specie di uccelli nel nord
della Dobrugia (Romania). Avocetta 2: 3-18.
Kotov,A. A.1974.The ecology of the Turtle Dove in the
southern Urals. Bulletin of Moscow Society of Naturalists
– Biological Series 79: 36-43.(In Russian)
Kraus, M., Krauss,W., & Mattern, U. 1972.Zur Verbreitung
der Turtletaube (Streptopelia turtur) in Nordbayern.
Anzeiger der Ornithologischen Gesellschaft in Bayern 11:
263-268.
Lofts, B., Mur ton, R. K., & Westwood, N. J. 1967.
Experimental demonstration of a post-nuptial
refractory period in the Turtle Dove Streptopelia turtur.
Ibis 109: 352-358.
Macdonald, D.W., & Johnson, P. J.2000.Farmers and the
custody of the countryside: trends in loss and
conservation of non-productive habitats 1981-1998.
Biol. Conserv. 94: 221-234.
Marchant, J. H., Hudson, R., Car ter, S. P., & Whittington, P.
1990. Population Trends in British Breeding Birds.BTO,
Thetford.
Marchant, S. 1969.Turtle Dove migration in Iberia and the
Middle East. Brit. Birds 62: 84.
Mason, C. F. 2001.Woodland area,species turnover and
the conservation of bird assemblages in lowland
England. Biodiversity and Conservation 10: 495-510.
— & Macdonald, S. M. 2000.Influence of landscape and
land-use on the distribution of breeding birds in
farmland in eastern England. J. Zool. Lond. 251: 339-348.
Miller,H. 1992.Twenty years of the Common Birds Census
on Hollesley Heath. Suffolk Birds 41: 7-11.
Moorcroft, D.,& Wilson, J. D. 2000.The ecology of Linnets
Carduelis cannabina on lowland farmland. In:Aebischer,
N. J., Evans, A. D., Grice , P. V., & Vickery, J. A. (eds.), Ecology
and Conservation of Lowland Farmland Birds: 173-181.
BOU,Tring.
Morel, G.,& Morel,M.-Y. 1979.La Tourterelle des bois dans
l’extrême ouest-africain. Malimbus 1: 66-67.
— & — 1988. Nouvelles données sur l’hivernage de la
Tourterelle des bois Streptopelia turtur en Afrique de
l’Ouest: nord de la Guineé.Alauda 56: 85-91.
Morel, M.-Y. 1985.La Tourterelle des bois, Streptopelia
turtur,en Sénégambie: évolution de la population au
cours de l’année et identification des races. Alauda 53:
100-110.
— 1987. La Tourterelle des bois, Streptopelia turtur, dans
l’ouest africain: mouvements migratoires et régime
alimentaire. Malimbus 9: 23-42.
Mountfort, G. 1981.Diurnal migration of Turtle Doves. Brit.
Birds 74: 265-266.
Murton, R. K.1968.Breeding,migration and survival of
Turtle Doves. Brit. Birds 61: 193-212.
—,Westwood, N.J.,& Isaacson,A. J. 1964.The feeding
habits of the Woodpigeon Columba palumbus, Stock
Dove C. oenas and Turtle Dove Streptopelia turtur.Ibis
106: 174-188.
Nankinov,D. 1994a.The breeding biology of the Turtle
Dove (Streptopelia turtur) in Bulgaria. Gibier Faune
Sauvage, Game & Wildlife 11: 155-165.
— 1994b. Migrations of the Turtle Dove (Streptopelia
turtur) in Bulgaria: a review.Gibier Faune Sauvage, Game
& Wildlife 11: 249-261.
Norris, C. A. 1960.The breeding distribution of thirty
species in 1952. Bird Study 7: 129-184.
O’Connor,R.J.,& Shrubb,M.1986.Farming and Birds. CUP,
Cambridge.
Office National de la Chasse. 1999.Turtle Dove
Management Plan.European Commission, Brussels.
Peach,W. J., Baillie, S. R., & Underhill, L. 1991. Survival of
British Sedge Warblers Acrocephalus schoenobaenus in
relation to West African rainfall. Ibis 133: 300-305.
Peiró,V.1990.Aspectos de la reproducción de la tórtola
común (Streptopelia turtur, L.) en Madrid. Mediterránea
(Serie Biologia) 12: 89-96.
Pikula, J.,& Beklova, M.1984.Bionomy of Streptopelia
decaocto and S. turtur in Czechoslovakia.Acta
Scientiarum Naturalium Academiae Scientiarum
Bohemolsovacae – Brno 18: 1-45.
Pollard, E., Hooper,M. D.,& Moore,N.W.1974.Hedges.
Collins, London.
Potts, G. R. 1986. The Partridge: pesticides, predation and
conservation. Collins, London.
Rands, M.R.W.1986.Effect of hedgerow characteristics on
partridge breeding densities.J. Appl. Ecol. 23: 479-487.
Rappe, A. 1965. Notes sur le passage diurne de la
Tourterelle des bois Streptopelia turtur et du Coucou
Cuculus canorus.Aves 2: 27-31.
Sharrock, J.T. R. 1976. The Atlas of Breeding Birds in Britain
and Ireland. Poyser, Calton.
Spencer,K.G.1965.A history of the non-domestic doves
and pigeons in Lancashire during the past century.
The Naturalist, 1965: 48-50.
Thomson, D.L.,& Cotton,P.A.2000.Understanding the
decline of the British population of Song Thrushes
Turdus philomelos. In:Aebischer, N. J., Evans, A. D., Gr ice,
P. V., & Vicker y, J. A. (eds.), Ecology and Conser vation of
Lowland Farmland Birds: 151-155. BOU,Tring.
Tryjanowski, P., & Sparks,T.2001.Is the detection of the
first arrival date of migrating birds influenced by
population size? A case study of the Red-backed Shrike
Lanius collurio. Int. J. Biometeorol.45: 217-219.
—, Ku´
zniak, S., & Sparks,T. 2002. Earlier arrival of some
farmland migrants in western Poland. Ibis 144: 62-68.
Tucker, G.,& Heath,M. F.1994.Birds in Europe:their
conservation status. BirdLife International, Cambridge.
Vanhinsbergh, D.2000.The ecology of the Red-backed
Shrike Lanius collurio (abstract). In: Aebischer, N. J., Evans,
A. D., Grice, P.V., & Vickery, J. A. (eds.), Ecology and
Conservation of Lowland Farmland Birds:182. BOU,Tring.
Walther, G.-R., Post, E., Convey, P., Menzel,A., Parmesan, C .,
Beebee,T. J. C., Fromentin, J.-M., Hoegh-Guldberg, O., &
Bairlein, F. 2002.Ecological responses to recent climate
change. Nature 416: 389-395.
Winstanley, D., Spencer, R., & Williamson, K. 1974.Where
have all the Whitethroats gone? Bird Study 2: 1-14.
Yeatman-Berthelot, D., & Jarry, G.1995.Nouvel Atlas des
Oiseaux Nicheurs de France 1985-1989. Société
Ornithologique de France, Paris.
72 British Birds 98 • February 2005 • 58-72
Studies of West Palearctic birds: Turtle Dove
Stephen Browne and Nicholas Aebischer
The Game Conservancy Trust, Fordingbridge, Hampshire SP6 1EF
BB Feb 2005 21/1/05 1:08 pm Page 72
... During breeding, the species is mainly associated with farmland habitats containing woodland, scrub and hedgerows. There, the turtle dove uses woody elements as nesting habitat and agricultural areas as foraging habitat (Aubineau and Boutin, 1998;Browne et al., 2004;Browne and Aebischer, 2005;Hermant and Frochot, 1997). The species is therefore considered as a farmland habitat specialist, although being more associated with open woodlands and forested areas in southern Europe (Bakaloudis et al., 2009;Dias et al., 2013). ...
... This suggests that forest edges may provide suitable nesting habitat for turtle doves if forest stands are not too large, otherwise this habitat becomes less suitable to turtle doves which favour mixed habitats. This non-linear effect seems to be consistent with the literature as a whole, which suggests positive effects in some studies (Browne et al., 2004;Browne and Aebischer, 2005), and negative effects in others (Dunn and Morris, 2012;Carricondo, 2016), depending on woodland configuration. These contradictory effects may be due to two factors. ...
Article
Agricultural changes in recent decades have led to a widespread loss of biodiversity, with habitat loss considered as the main factor in the decline. The European turtle dove is one of the farmland birds that has declined markedly in Europe, leading the IUCN to downgrade its status in 2015 from “Near Threatened” to “Vulnerable”. Knowledge of how habitat factors and agricultural practices influence the turtle dove population is crucial for the conservation of this species through the implementation of targeted measures. Here we investigate how foraging and nesting habitats influence the abundance of turtle doves at national and regional scales, using a 23-year dataset from point counts carried out throughout France, a stronghold country for this species during the breeding season. We found that turtle dove abondance was positively affected by fallow lands, both at national and regional scales. Turtle dove abundance was also negatively affected by fodder crop area at national scale, but the effect was detected in only four of the 13 French regions. We also showed that an increase in hedgerows length had a positive effect on turtle dove abundance. On the other hand, forest edges length showed a bell-shaped trend, suggesting that an increase in forest edges length may have a favourable effect on turtle dove abundance only up to a given threshold. We suggest that targeted conservation measures combining an increase in fallow lands and hedgerows length could allow the stabilisation or even an increase in turtle dove abundance in France, but also in European countries with similar landscapes.
... La revisión bibliográfica realizada por Carboneras y colaboradores (2022b) en relación con la dieta indica que esta especie se alimenta de una gran variedad de semillas de plantas silvestres y también cultivadas. En varias partes del área de distribución se ha demostrado que hay un cambio de semillas silvestres a semillas cultivadas a medida que avanza la temporada (Jiménez et al. 1992, Dias and Fontoura 1996, Browne and Aebischer 2003, 2005, Gutiérrez-Galán and Alonso 2016, Dunn et al. 2018, asociado bien a la disminución de la disponibilidad de las primeras o al aumento de la disponibilidad de las últimas. Además, en países como en Inglaterra se ha observado un aumento en el contenido de la dieta de semillas cultivadas frente a silvestres durante todo el periodo reproductor en comparación con la dieta observada hace unas décadas, probablemente relacionada con la disminución de las plantas silvestres asociadas a los cambios agrícolas experimentados en este tiempo (Browne & Aebischer 2001). ...
... In wintering sites, such as sub-Saharan Africa, water sources are suggested to pose a higher risk of disease transmission, as water is generally scarcer, leading to high densities of birds congregating at watering holes, increasing both the likelihood of parasites being deposited in pools by infected hosts, and infective agents being picked up by uninfected hosts (Amin et al., 2014). Typically, when in Africa, turtle doves go to drink at first light or sunset, when large congregations of birds are observed (Browne & Aebischer, 2005). ...
Article
Full-text available
Trichomonas gallinae , a protozoan parasite infecting a wide range of birds, has been a cause for conservation concern since its recognition as an emerging infectious disease, having had notable impacts on several avian species, including causing widespread mortality in greenfinches ( Chloris chloris ), and chaffinches ( Fringilla coelebs ), and hindering the recovery of the endangered pink pigeon ( Nesoenas mayeri ). Horizontal transmission between birds congregating at feeding sites, such as those provided for conservation and species management purposes, is an important driver in the spread of T. galliane . Supplementary feeding is a key conservation intervention for the European turtle dove ( Streptopelia turtur ), which is declining across its range, driven at least partially by a loss of natural food resources. Due to the link between T. gallinae transmission and supplementary feeding, we consider the prevalence of this parasite among European turtle dove in relation to diet, in the first study to analyze these two factors in the decline of this species together. Using birds sampled from breeding and wintering grounds, the dietary composition of individuals was compared to the presence of T. gallinae , and specific T. gallinae strains. Dietary variation was summarized into two axes using detrended correspondence analysis; neither was associated with the presence of T. gallinae or any specific strains. The proportion of diet accounted for by cultivated seeds did not affect parasite presence, despite the spread of this parasite being associated with supplementary feeding due to an increase in contact between potentially infected and uninfected birds gathering at high densities at feeding sites. Significant dietary overlap was observed between infected and uninfected individuals in all sites, with almost complete dietary overlap being observed in one breeding site. The level of dietary overlap between individuals infected with specific strains fluctuated between sampling seasons, indicating no consistent relationship between diet and infection status.
... The turtle dove is a typical migratory species that has suffered a rapid and continuous decline principally across its Northern ranges (population losses: −78% in Britain from 1980 to 2013 (Browne & Aebischer, 2005) and −70% in Spain from 1980 to 2020; Moreno Zarate et al., 2020; Moreno Zarate, Arroyo & Peach, 2021), despite pronounced conservation measures (Hanane, 2017;Moreno Zarate, Arroyo & Peach, 2021). Consequently, turtle doves have been categorized as 'Vulnerable' in Europe (BirdLife International, 2015. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: The turtle dove is a migratory species that has suffered a rapid decline principally across its Northern ranges, despite pronounced conservation measures. Consequently, it has been categorized as ‘Near Threatened’ in Europe. Degradation of breeding habitats and a decrease in food resources are listed as principal causes of this decline. Despite its importance, the productivity of the North African population is widely unknown. Here we present the first estimation of the density of the breeding population and the superior reproductively of Streptopelia turtur arenicola in Morocco and entire North Africa. Methods: This study was carried out for two seasons 2018–2019 in the Saïss plain, central Morocco. Based on previous data, doves were monitored weekly, from early March to late August, in aquatic ecosystems (two dams and one river) and farmlands (cereals and orchards). The breeding population was censused using the “pointcount” method, following a walked transect of 5 km in orchards, 7 km in cereal fields, and 3 km along the river. Equally, nests were searched in natural habitats counting riparian trees, forests, and ornamental trees, and in orchards based on the Common Birds Census (CBC) methodology, in which the singing doves, mating pairs, nesting, and/or feeding behavior were the most monitored signs to discover nests. In orchards, nests were searched line-by-line based on the rows of fruit trees. For each recorded nest, we note the breeding chronology, clutch size and incubation period, success and failure factors, dimensions, and vertical placement on trees. To evaluate the predictors of doves’ occurrence, we noted at each site the presence of cereals, water, human disturbance, presence of nesting trees, and predators. Results and Discussion: In total, 3,580 turtle doves (22.37 birds/ha), including 240 breeding pairs, were documented. Nesting occurred mainly in olive groves, cereals were used for forage, and aquatic ecosystems for water sources. The nesting period lasted from late April to July (last fledglings). All nests were located on olive trees at a height of 225.30 ± 48.87 cm. The clutch size was 1.98 ± 0.13 (laid eggs/built nests), the incubation period lasted 14.16 ± 1.32 days, and the rearing period lasted 16.54 ± 1.76 days. The breeding success among the 240 monitored nests accounted for 73.84% during the nesting phase and 87.42% during the incubation phase; 71.5%% of nestlings have fledged, which is the highest success rate for turtle doves in Europe and Northwest Africa. Clutches were aborted mostly due to predation from snakes (7.5% of nests, 16.12% of eggs, and 5.63% of chicks), nest desertion (9.16% of nests and 5.37% of eggs), and marginally by the destruction of nests through farming activities. These findings are important for conservation plans, to restore turtle doves’ habitats in Europe, where the species is widely declining.
... There is a marked reduction in migratory bird population every year and there was a decrease in the population of avifauna at Uchalli Wetlands Complex (Ali, 2006;Khan and Ali, 2015). The human impact on wetland natural resources increased due to failure to understand the consequences of variation in natural habitats on wetland biodiversity including avifauna (Brown and Aebischer, 2005). The major objectives of this study were to study the diversity, abundance, and threats to avifauna at an important Ramsar site, Uchalli Wetlands Complex as well as Ahmedabad lake which is an important site for migratory birds as per locals and wildlife staff. ...
Article
Full-text available
Wetlands are one of the major habitats that play a vital role in the survival of biodiversity. The recent study aimed to evaluate diversity, abundance and threats to birds of an important Ramsar site, Uchalli Wetland Complex, along with Ahmedabad lake. Data were collected by direct (point count) as well as indirect method (interviews) from December 2020 to May 2021. In total, 139 avian species of 27,450 individuals were recorded at study sites. Results revealed that the species richness was maximum at Uchalli (133), followed by Khabbaki (92), Jahlar (88), and Ahmedabad lake (79). The Shannon Weiner index and Simpson index values for Jahlar lake, Uchalli lake, Khabbaki lake, and Ahmedabad lake were (2.99, 0.90), (2.32, 0.82), (2.26, 0.66) and (1.72, 0.51) respectively. The omnivore was the most abundant (40%) feeding guild followed by carnivores (32%) and insectivores (20%). Four vulnerable species sarus crane (Grus antigone), southern grey shrike (Lanius excubitor), imperial eagle (Aquila heliaca), and common pochard (Aythya ferina), four near-threatened species ferruginous pochard (Aythya nyroca), northern lapwing (Vanellus vanellus), alexandrine parakeet (Psittacula eupatria), and pallid harrier (Circus macrourus), and one endangered species steppe eagle (Aquila nipalensis) were observed during the study. These species require special attention for conservation as illegal hunting is one of the major threats to the species in the study area. Other threats include fishing, use of insecticides and pesticides.
... There is a marked reduction in migratory bird population every year and there was a decrease in the population of avifauna at Uchalli Wetlands Complex (Ali, 2006;Khan and Ali, 2015). The human impact on wetland natural resources increased due to failure to understand the consequences of variation in natural habitats on wetland biodiversity including avifauna (Brown and Aebischer, 2005). The major objectives of this study were to study the diversity, abundance, and threats to avifauna at an important Ramsar site, Uchalli Wetlands Complex as well as Ahmedabad lake which is an important site for migratory birds as per locals and wildlife staff. ...
... The turtle doves breeding in Iberia are within the western migratory flyway, and prenuptial migration occurs from late March to May, although the majority of birds arrive at their breeding grounds during April and May. Pairs will be formed during migration, but mainly after arriving at breeding grounds, when males will deliver "calls" to attract females [16]. In Spain, 2-3 clutches per pair (with 2 eggs each), will be laid during the breeding season, from April to August. ...
Article
Full-text available
In some regions of Spain, hunting grounds conduct management targeting the European turtle dove (Streptopelia turtur), a commonly hunted species, and unsustainable harvesting levels at these sites have been identified as one of the factors responsible for the species’ decline across its range. In hunting grounds where food was provided, we estimated the local turtle dove abundance before the hunting season, productivity (juvenile/adult ratio) and harvesting levels using harvest data from managed grounds over 4 years (2009, 2015, 2019 and 2020). Compared to previous research, a higher productivity value was found (median 1.67, range 1.24–4.15) in grounds providing more food for a longer period. We calculated that the harvesting rate should not exceed 37% of the estimated turtle dove population size (35–45%). Significant differences were found between the estimated local turtle dove abundance using a removal sampling protocol and the number of birds observed by hunters before the hunting season, which suggests that in a high proportion of grounds, the latter method may have led to bird overestimation and overharvesting. Our research supports the current European Union’s harvest management plan to promote sustainable hunting in grounds where targeted management is conducted.
... Similar results have been obtained in Germany but in relation to forest cover (Marx and Quillfeldt 2018). In many European regions, hedges and various coniferous and deciduous trees are of major significance for its breeding distribution (Browne and Aebisher 2005, Bakaloudis et al. 2009, Sáenz de Buruaga et al. 2012, Kleemann and Quillfeldt 2014. In some Mediterranean countries, Turtle dove nesting locations can also be found in olive, orange, eucalyptus and other plantations (Pina 1989, Peiro 1990, Boukhemza et al. 2008, Hanane and Baamal 2011. ...
Article
Full-text available
We monitored the abundance of European Turtle dove in 6 forest habitats. The present study identifies two variables that can affect the breeding distribution of European Turtle dove in Sarne-na Sredna Gora Mountain. The arable land adjacent to the breeding habitats is a significant factor influencing its breeding distribution in the study area. The abundance is significantly higher in forest habitats adjacent to cereal, sunflower and sunflower/cereal crops. Second environmental variable which determines its breeding distribution is elevation. The study shows differences between the preferences of breeding sites of Turtle doves in Sarnena Sredna Gora and those found in lowland open habitats in Bulgaria. These results suggest that different approaches to habitat management need to be chosen for different parts of the breeding area of the species in Bulgaria.
Article
Full-text available
The European turtle dove (Streptopelia turtur) is an endangered IUCN Red List species impacted by agricultural intensification. Although its population has declined, there is limited knowledge of its habitat preferences in Eastern European countries. To address this gap, we conducted a study in the Czech Republic to investigate the environmental factors that affect the distribution of turtle doves. We used turtle dove presence data from countrywide monitoring efforts, as well as environmental variable datasets describing all natural and human-modified ecosystems making up the land cover of the country. We analysed the general effects of land cover on turtle dove distribution using generalised mixed-effects models. We performed a compositional analysis of habitat use to investigate detailed habitat preferences. A higher proportion of urban and wetland land cover was associated with a significant decrease in turtle dove presence. In contrast, a higher proportion of agricultural and forest land cover was associated with the increased presence of turtle doves. In addition, the compositional analysis revealed significant differences between the suitability of individual habitat types within each land cover type. For example, turtle doves preferred coniferous tree plantations and semi-natural beech and riparian forests, but oak forests, broadleaf, and mixed tree plantations were strongly avoided. In agricultural areas, turtle doves strongly preferred semi-natural grasslands and vineyards but avoided intensive agriculture. Overall, our study provides important insights into the habitat preferences of the endangered turtle dove in the Czech Republic, which can better inform conservation efforts for the species.
Article
Full-text available
This study aimed to evaluate the spatial microdistribution and temporal microdistribution of the North African subspecies of the globally threatened Turtle Doves in Morocco. From the end of February to early September, we monitored the migration dates, counting arrival and departure dates, and breeding chronology, to clarify if the breeding season is divided into sub-breeding phases or not. Equally, the spatial distribution of nests following potential breeding phases was surveyed weekly in Beni Mellal province following a map of a selected orange orchard. Doves arrived in Beni Mellal in the third week of March and left in mid-October, according to the results. The first nests occurred in the second week of April, followed by the first eggs in the third week of April and the first chicks in the first week of May. PCA analysis showed that the nesting and laying stages were achieved principally during the last two weeks of April and the first three weeks of May, the hatching stage between the fourth week of May and the second week of July, and fledging between the fourth week of July and the first week of September. Further, the breeding season was divided into two phases: the first breeding phase, from the first week of April to the first week of June, and the second phase, between the second week of June and the second week of August. The DCA analysis and orchard-created map indicated that the first wave of breeders colonized the marginal trees located on the orchard sides, surrounded by foraging cereals and legumes, and the second breeding-phase nests were constructed in flocks next to the nests of the first breeding phase. According to this strategy, the first breeders prospect the orchard and select nesting trees near foraging resources, while the second breeders’ wave colonizes trees near successfully used prospector sites. These findings are of great importance for comparative investigations and habitat-scale conservation management.
Article
Full-text available
The breeding biology of Turtle Dove Streptopelia turtur arenicola, was studied in Zéralda (west of Algiers) from 2003 to 2006 and in Fréha and Boukhalfa (Kabylia) from 2005 to 2006. Migration began at the end of March. Nest-building started in early April. Egg-laying started from mid-April until the beginning of August. Turtle Doves built their nests at an average height of 3.93 m ± 1.86 m (n = 333) above ground on trees whose average height was 6.42 ± 2.17 (n = 333). More than (72.8%) of the nests are built on branches in the external part of the tree at 1.88 m ± 0.82 m (n = 254) from the trunk. In other part, 61.3% (n = 333) of the nests were directed toward the East. In Zéralda, 53.9% of the couples built their nests at less than 10 m from each other, because of the presence of a strong density in auspicious nest building support. While, 66.7 and 47.7% of the couples, respectively in Fréha and Boukhalfa, made their nests at more than 10 m from each other. Hatching was noted from the first days of May until end of August. The breeding season took place during approximately five months, from the first egg-laying to the last fledged chicks. The average clutch size was 1.95 ± 0.20 eggs per nest. Two eggs clutches were dominant (95.5%). Nest abandon (61.8%, n = 291) and predation (21%) were the main causes of failure at the laying or incubation stages. At the breeding chick stage, predation was the most important cause of fledging failure (64.1%, n = 39). Breeding success, as proportion of fledged chicks per laying eggs, was 31.4%. Productivity was 0.61 fledged chicks per nest. The average density of nests with egg-laying per hectare in the studied sites was 6.56 ± 3.88 nests/ha (10.93 nests ± 0.55 in Zéralda, 3.5 ± 0 in Fréha and 5.25 ± 0.35 nests in Boukhalfa).
Article
Full-text available
Capsule Breeding density on long-term CBC plots fell in proportion to loss of nesting rather than feeding habitat. Aim To investigate the habitat requirements of Turtle Dove and relate changes in breeding density to changes in habitat, at the national scale. Methods Bird and habitat data were extracted from 30 long-term farmland and woodland CBC plots for the period 1965 to 1995. Results Turtle Dove densities declined at an average annual rate of 4.6% on both farmland and woodland plots, equal to a decline of 76% over the period 1965 to 1995. Turtle Dove density on the woodland plots was, on average, 6.5 times greater than on the farmland plots. Overall habitat availability did not change over time, but some finer measures of habitat quality, such as habitat diversity nesting and feeding habitat availability did change. Changes in Turtle Dove density were positively related to changes in the amount of hedgerow and woodland edge per unit area on the farmland CBC plots, where Turtle Dove territories contained three times more woodland than expected from availability. On the woodland CBC plots, territories were established apparently at random. Conclusion It is likely that the availability of nesting habitat dictates Turtle Dove density, with areas of woodland and scrub supporting on average 6.5-times more breeding Turtle Doves, per unit area, than farmland.
Article
Full-text available
This is the third assessment of the population status of birds in the UK. The listing criteria are based on global conservation status, historical population declines, recent population declines (both in numbers and in geographical range), European conservation status, breeding rarity, localised distribution, and the international importance of populations. For consistency, the criteria follow closely those used by previous reviews, with minor modifications where new information or methods are available. We have assessed the population status of 247 species in the UK: 40 (c. 16%) were placed on the 'Red list', 121 (c. 49%) on the 'Amber list', and 86 (c. 35%) on the 'Green list'. The number of Red-listed species has increased by four, and the number of Amber-listed species by eleven since the previous review in 1996. Nine new species have been added to the Red list because of declines in their breeding populations, while thirty-one species have remained Red listed. Five species have moved from the Red to the Amber list because their populations have more than doubled in the last 25 years.
Article
The ‘crash’ of the W hitethroat population in 1969 was one of the more startling revelations of the Trust’s Common Birds Census; but more alarming is the bird’s failure to make any sort of recovery. Having investigated the possible causes of the decline, the authors are convinced that the Whitethroat is the victim of a recent climatic deterioration in its winter quarters, the drought-stricken Sahel Zone of West Africa.