Despite the fact that interdisciplinary research on welfare has grown a lot in recent decades,
there is still a lack of agreement on its definition (happiness, health, well-being, quality of life,
etc.), its characterization (physical, social, labor, emotional, etc.), its operationalization
(affections, satisfaction with life, self-acceptance, autonomy, etc.), as well as on the theoretical perspective most suitable for its analysis (universal, situational, personalist, etc.). In this situation, it is not surprising the great variety of instruments currently available to measure psychological well-being, to the point that the selection of the most appropriate one represents a real challenge for any researcher.
With the aim to create a useful selection guide to solve above situation, in this work we have
conducted a systematic literature research in different scientific data sources (Medline,
Pubmed, Embase, LatinIndex, Dialnet and Google Schoolar) for studies published between
2013 and 2018, with additional hand-searching, to identified empirical studies that investigated
well-being using a measurement scale. As a result, we have identified 56 unique self-report
questionnaires for use with early and middle adult population, 41 of which evaluate hedonic
well-being and 15 eudaimonic one. Within the first, 14 measure the affective component of
hedonic well-being, 12 the cognitive component and 15 both components simultaneously
(hedonic and eudaimonic). Measurement scales are either unidimensional or multidimensional (up to 12 different domains). The scales included between 1 and 160 items.