We point out the flaw in the analysis of Gangopadhyaya and Mallow, hepth/0206133, where it is claimed that supersymmetry is broken in the SUSY half-oscillator, even with a regularization respecting supersymmetry. In an earlier paper [1], we had shown that supersymmetry, in quantum mechanical theories with singular potentials or nontrivial boundaries, is preserved if the system is regularized in a
... [Show full abstract] manner respecting supersymmetry. This is in contrast to the earlier claims [2, 3, 4] that supersymmetry is broken in such systems. We had shown, in particular, that if the superpotential is regularized, as opposed to the conventional 1 wisdom of regularizing the potential, supersymmetry is maintained in such systems in a natural manner. The reason for this is quite clear. A regularized superpotential leads to a pair of supersymmetric Hamiltonians for every value of the regularization parameter whereas a conventionally regularized potential does not lead to a pair of supersymmetric Hamiltonians for any value of the regularization parameter. In a recent paper, Gangopadhyaya and Mallow [5] claim that of the examples