... There is a broad literature discussing the use and reliability of these methods as estimators of chronological age in human children (e.g., Mappes et al., 1992;Koshy and Tandon, 1998;Bolanos et al., 2000;Frucht et al., 2000;Flores-Mir et al., 2006;Maber et al., 2006;Uysal et al., 2006;Cardoso, 2007;Lai et al., 2008;Tunc and Koyuturk, 2008;Al-Hadlaq et al., 2008;Maia et al., 2010;Perinetti et al., 2012), on the basis that both dental development and skeletal maturity both progress (i.e., are correlated) with age. Other studies have assessed the relationship (correlation) between skeletal and dental maturity apart from chronological age (e.g., Coutinho et al., 1993;Başaran et al., 2007;Al-Hadlaq et al., 2008;Cho and Hwang, 2009;Chaudhry et al., 2010;Chen et al., 2010;Kumar et al., 2011;R o _ zyło-Kalinowska et al., 2011;Sandeep and Sonia, 2013), and these studies essentially analyze the relative developmental patterns among somatic systems. While skeletal fusion or dental development may individually demonstrate strong correlations with age, they are not necessarily strongly correlated with each other due to differential effects of environment and other factors (e.g., Mappes et al., 1992;Cardoso, 2007). ...